Comparison of tolmetin sodium and aspirin in the treatment of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

Systematic review and network meta-analysis of different non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for juvenile idiopathic arthritis

BACKGROUND

Various non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been used for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). However, the optimal method for JIA has not yet been developed.

AIM

To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to determine the optimal instructions.

METHODS

We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, CNKI, and Wanfang without restriction for publication date or language at August, 2023. Any RCTs that comparing the effectiveness of NSAIDs with each other or placebo for JIA were included in this network meta-analysis. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analysis was used to rank the treatments. P value less than 0.05 was identified as statistically significant.

RESULTS

We included 8 RCTs (1127 patients) comparing 8 different instructions including meloxicam (0.125 qd and 0.250 qd), Celecoxib (3 mg/kg bid and 6 mg/kg bid), piroxicam, Naproxen (5.0 mg/kg/d, 7.5 mg/kg/d and 12.5 mg/kg/d), inuprofen (30-40 mg/kg/d), Aspirin (60-80 mg/kg/d, 75 mg/kg/d, and 55 mg/kg/d), Tolmetin (15 mg/kg/d), Rofecoxib, and placebo. There were no significant differences between any two NSAIDs regarding ACR Pedi 30 response. The SUCRA shows that celecoxib (6 mg/kg bid) ranked first (SUCRA, 88.9%), rofecoxib ranked second (SUCRA, 68.1%), Celecoxib (3 mg/kg bid) ranked third (SUCRA, 51.0%). There were no significant differences between any two NSAIDs regarding adverse events. The SUCRA shows that placebo ranked first (SUCRA, 88.2%), piroxicam ranked second (SUCRA, 60.5%), rofecoxib (0.6 mg/kg qd) ranked third (SUCRA, 56.1%), meloxicam (0.125 mg/kg qd) ranked fourth (SUCRA, 56.1%), and rofecoxib (0.3 mg/kg qd) ranked fifth (SUCRA, 56.1%).

CONCLUSION

In summary, celecoxib (6 mg/kg bid) was found to be the most effective NSAID for treating JIA. Rofecoxib, piroxicam, and meloxicam may be safer options, but further research is needed to confirm these findings in larger trials with higher quality studies.

Efficacy and Safety of NSAIDs in Infants: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature of the Past 20 Years

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used in infants, children, and adolescents worldwide; however, despite sufficient evidence of the beneficial effects of NSAIDs in children and adolescents, there is a lack of comprehensive data in infants. The present review summarizes the current knowledge on the safety and efficacy of various NSAIDs used in infants for which data are available, and includes ibuprofen, dexibuprofen, ketoprofen, flurbiprofen, naproxen, diclofenac, ketorolac, indomethacin, niflumic acid, meloxicam, celecoxib, parecoxib, rofecoxib, acetylsalicylic acid, and nimesulide. The efficacy of NSAIDs has been documented for a variety of conditions, such as fever and pain. NSAIDs are also the main pillars of anti-inflammatory treatment, such as in pediatric inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Limited data are available on the safety of most NSAIDs in infants. Adverse drug reactions may be renal, gastrointestinal, hematological, or immunologic. Since NSAIDs are among the most frequently used drugs in the pediatric population, safety and efficacy studies can be performed as part of normal clinical routine, even in young infants. Available data sources, such as (electronic) medical records, should be used for safety and efficacy analyses. On a larger scale, existing data sources, e.g. adverse drug reaction programs/networks, spontaneous national reporting systems, and electronic medical records should be assessed with child-specific methods in order to detect safety signals pertinent to certain pediatric age groups or disease entities. To improve the safety of NSAIDs in infants, treatment needs to be initiated with the lowest age-appropriate or weight-based dose. Duration of treatment and amount of drug used should be regularly evaluated and maximum dose limits and other recommendations by the manufacturer or expert committees should be followed. Treatment for non-chronic conditions such as fever and acute (postoperative) pain should be kept as short as possible. Patients with chronic conditions should be regularly monitored for possible adverse effects of NSAIDs.

Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group - over four decades of pivotal clinical drug research in pediatric rheumatology

IMPORTANCE

Specialized research networks are essential to achieve drug approvals for rare pediatric diseases. Such networks help realize the potential of global legislation enacted upon the recognition that most children are treated with drugs whose most beneficial dose and regimen have not been established in pediatric patients. The Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group (PRCSG) is a North American clinical trials network that is specialized in the performance of clinical trials of new therapies for pediatric populations with rheumatic diseases. This review provides an overview of the strategies employed by this research network to achieve drug and biologic approvals for children with pediatric rheumatic diseases, particularly juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

OBSERVATIONS

Clinical trial conduct in rare pediatric diseases has required global recruitment. Supported or led by the PRCSG, highly responsive, validated, composite measures have been established to assess drug efficacy. For pediatric orphan diseases with high disease burdens, specialized investigative sites and study designs are needed to complete adequately powered trials at the high standard necessary to enable drug labeling by regulatory agencies. Novel trial designs have been utilized for more efficient testing of innovative drug candidates. All these have been developed or co-developed by the PRCSG research network.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Specialized research networks in pediatric rheumatology, such as the PRCSG, have changed the landscape of available therapies and improved overall disease outcomes for children with pediatric rheumatic diseases.

Advances from clinical trials in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Treatments available to children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) have improved dramatically in the past 15 years, largely because of the development of powerful new biologic treatments. However, the seeds of this development were sewed over 40 years ago with the formation of a group of paediatric rheumatologists who understood the necessity of performing clinical trials in children with JIA. From there, international paediatric rheumatology networks have grown, and are dedicated to and highly experienced in performing such clinical trials. Development of validated outcomes and methodologies has also been critical. The ability to perform these trials stems from legislation enabling the FDA and the European Medicines Agency to require studies to be performed in children before they can be licensed for use in children. Current efforts to enhance the understanding of treatment options for patients with JIA include the development of disease-specific rather than drug-specific consolidated registries, studies in personalized predictive medicine and the development of treatment protocols for regular clinical care of these patients.

Dosing regimen determination for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a review of studies during drug development

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common childhood arthritis. In the past 10-15 years, the medical treatment options of JIA have greatly evolved and expanded due to a better understanding of the disease and the application of biologic agents. Regulations pertinent to pediatric clinical research have also helped provide a legal basis for investigating the effects of drugs and biologics in pediatrics and facilitate the pediatric drug development. The evaluation of clinical pharmacology, efficacy, and safety has provided valuable labeling information for pediatric use, including comparing exposure between adult and pediatric patients, bridging different formulations and regimens, providing appropriate dose selection recommendation with the modeling and simulation approach, and assessing the risks and benefits. This review summarizes the drugs and biologics with JIA labeling implications and discusses the application of clinical pharmacology, safety, and efficacy assessment in determining pediatric dosing regimens.

2011 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: initiation and safety monitoring of therapeutic agents for the treatment of arthritis and systemic features

Guidelines and recommendations developed and/or endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) are intended to provide guidance for particular patterns of practice and not to dictate the care of a particular patient. The ACR considers adherence to these guidelines and recommendations to be voluntary, with the ultimate determination regarding their application to be made by the physician in light of each patient’s individual circumstances. Guidelines and recommendations are intended to promote beneficial or desirable outcomes but cannot guarantee any specific outcome. Guidelines and recommendations developed or endorsed by the ACR are subject to periodic revision as warranted by the evolution of medical knowledge, technology, and practice.

A prospective study comparing celecoxib with naproxen in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of celecoxib and naproxen in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA).

METHODS

In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study, subjects with JRA were randomized to receive a target dose of celecoxib 3 mg/kg bid or 6 mg/kg bid, or a target dose of naproxen 7.5 mg/kg bid for 12 weeks (maximum allowed dose=600 mg total daily dose). The primary efficacy measure was the percentage of responders at Week 12 attaining the American College of Rheumatology pediatric 30% improvement criterion (ACR Pediatric-30).

RESULTS

Both celecoxib doses were at least as effective as naproxen at Week 12 [ACR Pediatric-30 treatment differences: celecoxib 3 mg/kg bid-naproxen=1.36% (95% CI -13.08 to 15.80); celecoxib 6 mg/kg bid-naproxen=13.02% (95% CI -0.22 to 26.25)]. Celecoxib 6 mg/kg bid had a numerically higher response rate than celecoxib 3 mg/kg bid at all postrandomization visits and a numerically higher response rate than naproxen 7.5 mg/kg bid at Weeks 4, 8, and 12. Improvement in each ACR Pediatric-30 core set measure was comparable to or numerically higher for celecoxib 6 mg/kg bid than naproxen or celecoxib 3 mg/kg bid. Adverse event rates were similar for all treatment groups, except that gastrointestinal adverse events were more common in the naproxen group, although the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Celecoxib 3 mg/kg bid and 6 mg/kg bid were at least as effective as naproxen 7.5 mg/kg bid in treating the signs and symptoms of JRA over 12 weeks. All treatments were generally well tolerated.

Optimal treatment of knee monarthritis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a decision analysis

OBJECTIVE

To identify the optimal initial treatment strategy for knee monarthritis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) using a decision model and parents' preferences.

METHODS

We utilized a decision analysis model with Markov states and a 6-month multi-attribute outcome with 7 dimensions pertinent to the treatment decision. The 3 most common treatment strategies for knee monarthritis were compared: nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) only, NSAID trial followed by intraarticular corticosteroid injection (IACI) if arthritis was not resolved after 2 months, and initial IACI. Probability estimates for the efficacy and adverse effects of NSAIDs and IACIs were derived from a systematic review of the literature. Parents' preferences for the 7 dimensions of the multi-attribute outcome were elicited by a unique hybrid of the time tradeoff and magnitude estimation techniques. These preferences were then combined with the outcomes of the decision analysis to determine an individual's preferred treatment.

RESULTS

The NSAID trial strategy may avert IACIs in some patients, but at a cost of continued active arthritis. The number of patients that need to be treated with the NSAID trial strategy to avoid a single IACI compared with the initial IACI strategy is 3.8 with an expected additional cost of 6.7 months of active arthritis. Of the 12 parent subjects, 11 (92%) preferred the initial IACI strategy and 1 preferred the NSAID-only strategy. These preferences were not sensitive to model assumptions or probability estimates.

CONCLUSION

Initial IACI appears to be the optimal treatment strategy for knee monarthritis in JIA.

A peripatetic pediatrician's journey into pediatric rheumatology: Part II

Earl Brewer discusses his journey into pediatric rheumatology from 1958 to retirement in 1990 in three parts.

The history of pediatric rheumatology

The care and study of children with rheumatic diseases began slowly in the 19th century, with the most attention centered on rheumatic fever. Other rheumatic diseases of children received little attention until the 1940s. Rheumatic diseases taken together remain a significant cause of chronic illness in children throughout the world. A number of other conditions that masquerade as rheumatic diseases in children also demand recognition and management. Although ultimate causes and cures of childhood rheumatic diseases remain elusive, advances in therapy have improved the outlook for affected children, and advances in biomedical research are adding to our basic understanding of the disease process involved. Pediatric rheumatology has become a well-organized, although underpopulated, specialty that enhances recognition and care of affected children and contributes to basic research knowledge in infectious disease, immunology, and genetics. This review focuses most prominently on the early history of pediatric rheumatology and its development as a specialty. The recent burgeoning of new biomedical science and new means of treatment will be better told in the historical perspective of years to come.

Tolmetin and salicylate therapy in acute rheumatic fever: Comparison of clinical efficacy and side-effects

BACKGROUND

The arthritis of rheumatic fever is very responsive to treatment with salicylates, but there are many adverse reactions, especially hepatotoxicity, due to aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) therapy. These side-effects change the course and duration of rheumatic fever. Other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may be equally effective, although no reports are available.

METHODS

We studied 72 patients with rheumatic fever who were admitted to Dr Sami Ulus Children's Hospital between 1995 and 1999. Twenty patients with arthritis were treated with tolmetin (25 mg/kg per day; group I) and 52 patients with arthritis and/or mild carditis were put on aspirin therapy (75-100 mg/kg per day) for 4-6 weeks (group II). Arthritis had disappeared at the same time in both the aspirin and tolmetin groups (P = 0.675).

RESULTS

The erythrocyte sedimentation rates of patients upon admission, at the first week and at the end of therapy were not different in the two groups (P > 0.05). No adverse effect of tolmetin therapy was observed, whereas side-effects of salicylate were observed in 19 patients (36.5%) in the aspirin group. Hepatotoxicity, gastric irritation and salicylism were found in 16, four and three patients, respectively. Renal toxicity and Reye syndrome were not demonstrated. Because of these side-effects of aspirin, therapy had to be stopped for 10-20 days and the duration of hospitalization in this group was lengthened unnecessarily.

CONCLUSION

Tolmetin was safe and effective treatment for arthritic rheumatic fever patients without carditis. Tolmetin can be used particularly in patients who cannot tolerate aspirin.

Outcome measures and medical progress: Why outcome measures are needed in childhood arthritis

In this review, the historical process leading to the current status of outcome measurements will be discussed and the recent quality-of-life instruments to explore the mental, emotional, and social "hidden morbidity" of children with juvenile arthritis will be analyzed.

Risks and benefits of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in children: a comparison with paracetamol

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) possess antipyretic, analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. They are frequently used in children and have numerous therapeutic indications, the most common ones being fever, postoperative pain and inflammatory disorders, such as juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and Kawasaki disease. Their major mechanism of action is through inhibition of prostaglandin biosynthesis by blockade of cyclo-oxygenase (COX). The disposition of most NSAIDs has been mainly studied in infants > or = 2 years of age. Compared with adults, the volume of distribution and clearance of NSAIDs such as diclofenac, ibuprofen (infants aged between 3 months and 2.5 years), ketorolac and nimesulide were increased in children. The elimination half-life was similar in children to that in adults. These pharmacokinetic differences might be clinically significant with the need for higher loading and/or maintenance doses in children. Ibuprofen, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and acetaminophen are the most frequently used agents for fever reduction in children. Over the past 20 years, because of the association between ASA use and Reye's syndrome, most of the interest has been directed toward ibuprofen and acetaminophen. In view of its comparable antipyretic efficacy, but superior tolerability profile, acetaminophen, when used appropriately with age-adapted formulations, should remain the first-line therapy in the treatment of childhood fever. At the moment, there is no scientific evidence to recommend simultaneous use of these two antipyretic drugs. Most NSAIDs provide mild to moderate analgesia, with the exception of ketorolac which has a strong analgesic activity. The analgesic efficacy of ketorolac, ketoprofen, diclofenac and ibuprofen in the treatment of postoperative pain has been mainly studied following a single dose, in children of > or = 1 year of age undergoing minor surgeries. In this setting, when used either alone or in adjunct to caudal or epidural anaesthesia, they were associated with an opioid-sparing effect and were well tolerated. With the exception of ketorolac use in children undergoing tonsillectomy, where controversy exists regarding the risk of postoperative haemorrhage, NSAIDs have not been associated with an increased risk of perioperative bleeding. NSAIDs are the first-line therapy in JIA. They appear to be equally effective and tolerated, with the exception of ASA which is associated with more adverse effects. ASA has been used for many years in the treatment of Kawasaki disease and is part of the standard modality of treatment in combination with intravenous gammaglobulins. More recently, lung inflammation associated with cystic fibrosis (CF) has become a new target for NSAIDs. Despite promising preliminary results with ibuprofen, numerous questions need to be answered before this new strategy becomes part of the conventional treatment of patients with CF. In summary, NSAIDs are effective in reducing fever, alleviating pain and reducing inflammation in children, with a good tolerance profile. Pharmacokinetic studies are needed to characterise the disposition of NSAIDs in very young infants in order to use them rationally. To date, no studies have been published on the disposition, tolerability and efficacy of specific COX-2 inhibitors in children. Further clinical experience with these agents in adults is warranted before undergoing trials with specific COX-2 inhibitors in children.

Medical management of children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

One of the most important and changing areas of research in paediatric rheumatology is the optimum approach to the treatment of children with chronic arthritis. Until recently all medications for children with arthritis were nonspecific in terms of our understanding, albeit poor, of the pathogenesis of these diseases. Of current therapies, low dose, once-a-week methotrexate has emerged as the therapeutic agent of choice for children who fail to respond adequately to administration of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Thereby, it has displaced the more traditional slower acting anti-rheumatic drugs, although one or more of them are often combined with methotrexate in the polypharmaceutical approach to childhood arthritis. Better and more specific agents are needed, especially for systemic onset disease, unremitting polyarticular involvement, and certain complications such as resistant chronic uveitis. At this time the introduction of the cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors and etanercept (soluble tumour necrosis factoralpha.p75 fusion protein) may herald an era of more specific and effective therapy.

Pharmacokinetics of etodolac in patients with stable juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

This was a single-center, open-label, single-dose pharmacokinetic study of etodolac in pediatric and adolescent patients with stable juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA). Eleven male and female patients with JRA (8.1 to 14.8 years of age, weighing 26.4 to 59.5 kg) received a single oral dose of etodolac (200, 300, or 400 mg based on body weight). Clinical laboratory measurements, measurement of vital signs, and physical examinations were performed to monitor safety. Concentrations of etodolac were determined in plasma using high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection with a limit of quantitation of 0.2 mg/L and were analyzed using a noncompartmental pharmacokinetic method. Pharmacokinetic parameters observed were consistent in magnitude and degree of variability with data from healthy adult subjects receiving a single 400- or 600-mg dose of etodolac. Although the mean fraction of unbound drug in patients with JRA was higher than in healthy adults, the oral clearance was independent of age. No serious adverse events occurred during this study. Etodolac yielded consistent pharmacokinetic values among stratified dose subgroups. Single doses of all etodolac treatments were well tolerated in both pediatric and adolescent patients.

Visual outcomes prognosticators in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis-associated uveitis

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study is to delineate the visual prognosticators in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis-associated uveitis.

METHODS

The records of 43 patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis-associated uveitis who were observed for at least 6 months were studied retrospectively. Bivariate and multivariate statistical models were applied to more than 40 parameters to determine the relative odds of visual rehabilitation among patients with each characteristic.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven (86%) patients were females and 6 (14%) males. The mean known age of uveitis onset was 13 years, with females having, on average, 4 years earlier onset of disease compared to males (P = 0.04). Ninety-three percent had chronic, 5% had recurrent, and 2% had an acute monophasic disease course. Of the 76 affected eyes, 93% were nongranulomatous and 97% had iridocyclitis. The mean overall duration of uveitis was 146 months, with females suffering from a significantly longer duration of active disease than did males (P < 0.001). Nineteen (44%) patients underwent cataract extraction, and 16 (37%) underwent vitrectomy. Thirty (70%) of the patients experienced visual improvement with their therapy. When controlling for potential confounders, male sex (P = 0.006), shorter duration of uveitis (P = 0.007), older age at disease onset (P = 0.02), and a shorter delay in presentation to a subspecialist (P = 0.02) were associated significantly with visual acuity improvement. Visual acuity at presentation (P = 0.001), use of systemic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (P = 0.01), older age at disease onset (P = 0.02), absence of glaucomatous neuropathy (P = 0.02), and male sex (P = 0.03) were correlated strongly with a final visual acuity outcome of 20/40 or better.

CONCLUSION

Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis-associated uveitis is a serious disease with a guarded visual prognosis. It is hoped that increased awareness of its prognosticators will lead to treatment and referral patterns that have the best chance of minimizing the likelihood of visual impairment in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.

Gastrointestinal hemorrhage complicating aspirin therapy in acute Kawasaki disease

Although gastrointestinal hemorrhage is a well-recognized complication of aspirin therapy, this side effect has not been previously reported in patients with Kawasaki disease (KD). We describe two children with typical KD who had massive gastrointestinal bleeding that required hospitalization and transfusion. Physicians caring for patients with KD should instruct parents on the signs and symptoms of aspirin toxicity. Fortunately, gastrointestinal hemorrhage appears to be a rare complication of salicylate therapy in patients with Kawasaki disease.

Drug treatment in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Past, present, and future

Rheumatology made its debut as a legitimate subspecialty of pediatrics sometime in the 1940s in Europe, and in the 1970s in North America. Therapy of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis has evolved from salicylates and gold injections to newer, less toxic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and methotrexate. Corticosteroids remain as important drugs when life-threatening complications or blinding iridocyclitis develop. Immune response modifiers and gene therapies offer considerable potential for eventually halting or curing the disease but have yet to make a substantial impact on therapy. Methods for the correct conduct and interpretation of data from clinical trials are discussed.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and slow-acting anti-rheumatic drugs in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

The preferred drugs for the initial treatment of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) are salicylates or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) such as tolmetin or naproxen. If the disease activity does not respond adequately to the treatment, slow-acting anti-rheumatic drugs (SAARD) such as oral gold agents, low-dose D-penicillamine, or sulfasalazine should be given in addition to NSAID. If the systemic manifestations are severe, corticosteroid therapy may be commenced. Furthermore, if the joint destruction is progressive, immunosuppressants such as methotrexate would be selected as the third-line drugs of choice. The safety and efficacy of SAARD and immunosuppressants for the treatment of children with JRA, however, have not yet been confirmed, as the adverse effects such as bone marrow suppression, oncogenicity and mutagenicity are sometimes intense. Consequently, the strict indications for use and new therapeutic concepts for the management of JRA based on its pathogenesis are required.

Health status (arthritis impact) in children with chronic rheumatic diseases. Current measurement issues and an approach to instrument design

Arthritis outcome measures in adults have evolved from biologic "disease activity," to observations of motor/movement based "functional status," to assessment of "health status." This monograph suggests a framework for developing a pediatric arthritis health status (impact) instrument in which measurable global outcome dimensions include psychological, social, ADL, pain, school, family, behavioral, and developmental variables. Physical and laboratory parameters of inflammation/disease activity are not part of either functional status or arthritis impact, but rather perhaps the most important predictor variable of outcome. Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) is a prototypic chronic disease for development of a health status instrument for children. Prior obstacles have been (a) that systemic, polyarticular, and pauciarticular JRA appear to have very different amounts of impact on health status; and (b) although juvenile arthritis has proven a useful term for medical and public education, its value as a study entry criterion for functional status instrument development is limited. Any new pediatric arthritis impact instrument must fulfill five criteria: enable quantification; demonstrate reliability, validity, and precision; and specify data collection procedures. Important design issues include (a) developing a self-report format for children, (b) ensuring generalizability across age groups, and (c) the parent as proxy in most patient-related dialogue and interventions. Instrument elements could come from 8-10 adult and pediatric health/functional status instruments already in use. By 10 years of age, children can provide much independent information. Whether global assessments by patient, parent, and physician should be included, or be a separate "gold standard," is not yet clear. The creation of better health status measures is an important and formidable challenge for pediatric rheumatology.

Ibuprofen suspension in the treatment of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group

Ninety-two children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis were randomly assigned to treatment in a multicenter, double-blind, 12-week trial designed to compare the efficacy and safety of a liquid formulation of ibuprofen at a dosage of 30 to 40 mg/kg/day versus those of aspirin at a dosage of 60 to 80 mg/kg/day. No significant intergroup differences in response rates or in the amount of improvement in articular indexes of disease activity were observed. More children treated with aspirin discontinued treatment early because of adverse reactions. After this trial, 84 additional patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis entered a 24-week, multidose (30, 40, and 50 mg/kg/day), open trial of ibuprofen suspension. Favorable response rates for the three groups were similar, and continued improvement was observed throughout the 24-week period. A dose-response relationship was observed with respect to adverse reactions of the upper gastrointestinal tract. We conclude that ibuprofen suspension is an effective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug and that its tolerability in children is acceptable.

Clinical pharmacology and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

This review informs clinicians about current clinical usage and pharmacokinetics of newer NSAIDs and aspirin. To understand the effects of these drugs, a review of prostaglandin synthesis and actions is provided.

Characteristics of responders and nonresponders to slow-acting antirheumatic drugs in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

A 12-month double-blind, parallel, randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter trial of D-penicillamine and hydroxychloroquine was conducted in 162 children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis in the United States and in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. No statistically significant intergroup differences were detected in primary outcome variables. We investigated the possible existence of select subgroups of patients who have a higher likelihood of response to active drugs than to placebo. Using previously published criteria, each patient was classified as a responder or nonresponder, and their demographic and disease characteristics at baseline were compared. We were unable to identify a subgroup of individuals who were more likely to respond to D-penicillamine or hydroxychloroquine than to placebo.

Hepatotoxicity associated with choline magnesium trisalicylate: case report and review of salicylate-induced hepatotoxicity

A case of a 21-year-old woman who had developed mild hepatotoxicity while receiving choline magnesium trisalicylate therapy is described. She presented with fever and mild hepatic enzyme elevations before salicylate therapy was instituted. Liver function tests (LFT) returned to normal within five days of hospitalization but she continued to develop daily fevers. Blood, urine, and throat cultures were negative. An acute viral illness or reactivation of systemic lupus erythematosus were the suspected diagnoses. Choline magnesium trisalicylate was then administered in an effort to control her fever, and was successful. After three days of salicylate therapy her LFT values began to rise. They continued to rise for five more days before salicylate hepatotoxicity was suspected. Choline magnesium trisalicylate was discontinued after eight days and the patient's LFT quickly returned to normal. The source of fever was never identified, although infection with cytomegalovirus was considered the most likely cause. Salicylate-induced hepatotoxicity is reviewed.

Arthritis in children

Arthritis in children may result from many conditions. The rheumatic diseases, including juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, the spondyloarthropathies, rheumatic fever, lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis, and the various vasculitis syndromes all can cause arthritis; these diseases are distinguished by their characteristic clinical appearances. Several nonrheumatic disorders such as infections, malignancies, congenital or genetic conditions, orthopedic conditions, and psychological disorders may closely simulate the various rheumatic diseases. The evaluation of children with arthritis rests chiefly on historical and physical findings; radiographs, laboratory tests, and occasionally biopsies also may be helpful. It is particularly important to identify specifically treatable diseases, such as bacterial infections or childhood malignancies, early and to avoid labeling nonrheumatic conditions as rheumatic. Accurate diagnosis of the various rheumatic disease syndromes is important for optimal therapy.

Penicillamine and hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of severe juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Results of the U.S.A.-U.S.S.R. double-blind placebo-controlled trial

One hundred sixty-two children with severe juvenile rheumatoid arthritis were entered in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 12-month clinical trial designed to establish the efficacy and safety of two slower-acting antirheumatic drugs, penicillamine and hydroxychloroquine. The study was a cooperative effort of the United States and the Soviet Union. One group of subjects received 10 mg of penicillamine per kilogram of body weight per day, another group received 6 mg of hydroxychloroquine per kilogram daily, and a third group received placebo. All three groups were allowed a single concurrent nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug, but no other antirheumatic medications, including corticosteroids. All three groups had dramatic improvement in many of the clinical and laboratory outcome variables after one year of study. There were no significant differences in efficacy between the penicillamine and placebo groups. Pain on movement was the only index of articular disease that was alleviated more by hydroxychloroquine than by placebo. Serious adverse drug reactions attributable to the active agents were rare. We were unable to demonstrate that, in the presence of a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug, either penicillamine or hydroxychloroquine is superior to placebo in the treatment of children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.

Chronic arthritis in childhood

Chronic arthritis in childhood takes a number of different forms, each with its own distinctive potential complications and implications for prognosis. This article describes each of these forms, as well as therapeutic choices.

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and aspirin--analyzing the scores

We reviewed 103 controlled clinical trials that compared the antiarthritic efficacy and tolerance of previously and currently marketed nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and aspirin. Of 52 studies, 35 had data sufficient to calculate an NSAID efficacy index (the ratio of mean improvement in NSAID-treated patients to that in aspirin-treated patients) based on subjective and/or objective criteria. The mean indexes (obtained from all studies from which an index could be calculated) indicated no statistically significant difference in efficacy between aspirin and the NSAIDs as a group; the indexes tended to become less variable as the number of study subjects increased. Tolerance, assessed from the percentage of patients who discontinued the drug because of side effects, was significantly greater for NSAIDs than for aspirin. The NSAIDs had greater efficacy but not greater toxicity at increased doses. Efficacy differences described among NSAIDs in some studies were attributable either to comparisons at nonequivalent doses or to chance.

Naproxen and acetylsalicylic acid in the treatment of pauciarticular and polyarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Assessment of tolerance and efficacy in a single-centre 24-week double-blind parallel study

Naproxen (NAP) (10 mg/kg/day) and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) (75 mg/kg/day) were compared in a 24-week randomized block, controlled, parallel, double-blind study in 80 patients with pauciarticular or polyarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Five NAP-treated compared with 20 ASA-treated patients stopped therapy because of adverse reactions. Both drug regimens seemed to be therapeutically effective. The outcome of the study indicated that ASA may have a slight advantage over NAP with regard to efficacy. However, the changes in disease activity measurements were similar in the two treatment groups.

Early experiences with auranofin in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

Pharmacologic management of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis is only one of several modalities necessary for effective control. The stepping stones to proper management include a planned long-range program, physical therapy with swimming, good health habits, and consultation with other health professionals who are part of the management team. Pharmacologic therapy includes nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs initially, occasionally corticosteroids, and slow-acting antirheumatic drugs, including injectable gold when therapeutic response is inadequate. Early experiences with oral gold are reported here. Auranofin (triethylphosphine gold) was administered to 21 patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis during a segment I, open ended, open-label, noncontrolled trial designed to establish safety and preliminary efficacy. Initial dosage was 0.1 mg/kg per day; incremental increases to 0.2 mg/kg per day were allowed (with usual increase to 0.15 mg/kg per day). Aspirin (80 mg/kg per day) or tolmetin (20 to 40 mg/kg per day), or naproxen (400 to 600 mg/m2 per day) were allowed as rapidly acting antiinflammatory agents. Stable measurable plasma concentrations of gold were attained in all patients during the study. More than half the patients sustained clinically significant improvement (greater than 25 percent) with regard to the number and severity of joints with swelling, pain on motion, and tenderness. In nine of the 19 patients, the total number of joints with active arthritis decreased by at least 25 percent. All articular disease indices measured indicated improvement of group mean changes between the initial and final visit. Eleven of 16 patients with an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate showed decreases of at least 25 percent. The group given higher dosages had a greater proportion of responders in regard to decreases in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (nine of 11 patients). Four of six patients whose serums contained rheumatoid factor showed decreases in the titers. Discontinuation of auranofin was necessary in two patients: one because of headache and one because of hematuria and anemia associated with a severe flare-up of polyarticular disease. The results from this trial reveal sufficient patient improvement to plan a double-blind trial of auranofin in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.

Long-term therapy with tolmetin in rheumatoid arthritis

Data from over 1000 patients with rheumatoid arthritis who received tolmetin sodium in double-blind and open studies have been pooled to assess long-term efficacy and safety. Duration of the studies was 12 weeks to 48 months. Mean age of patients was 54 years; ratio of males to females was 1:3. The results showed that tolmetin provided rapid onset of action and continuous progressive decrease in symptoms in all measurements of inflammation. Mean number of painful joints was reduced from 22 at baseline to 16 at one month, to 9 at one year, and to 6 at two years. Duration of morning stiffness was 155 minutes at baseline, 123 minutes at one month, 74 minutes at one year, and 78 minutes at two years. The final global evaluation by the investigators showed that 61 per cent of patients had a marked or moderate response. Mean erythrocyte sedimentation rates did not increase during therapy with tolmetin. Initial dose of tolmetin in the patients pooled for this analysis was generally 600 to 800 mg/day, and the mean dose throughout the study was 1256 mg/day. The drug was well tolerated overall. As anticipated, gastrointestinal symptoms were the most frequently reported; nausea was experienced by 13 per cent of the patients at some time during therapy, and gastrointestinal distress, dyspepsia, or abdominal pain was reported by approximately 8.6 per cent each. Only 12.7 per cent of patients discontinued tolmetin because of untoward reactions; 15.9 per cent of patients discontinued because of insufficient therapeutic response. The results of these long-term studies of patients with rheumatoid arthritis demonstrated that tolmetin is an effective antiinflammatory agent with an acceptable record of safety.

Aspirin in the treatment of juvenile arthritis

Aspirin can be more closely controlled than other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs because serum salicylate levels can be measured. Dosages of 80 to 100 mg/kg per day usually lead to the desired serum salicylate levels of 20 to 25 mg/dl. Gastric irritation, the most frequent cause for cessation of aspirin therapy, is significantly reduced by the use of enteric-coated aspirin. At the onset of aspirin therapy in children, there is frequently moderate elevation of SGOT and SGPT liver enzyme levels. With continued treatment these levels usually fall into the range of mild elevations. Although these children with arthritis often take high doses of aspirin for years, Reye's syndrome is virtually never seen.

Hepatic and cerebral pathology findings in children with fatal salicylate intoxication: further evidence for a causal relation between salicylate and Reye's syndrome

Histology or necropsy records of 13 children with accidental or therapeutically induced salicylate intoxication were examined for the presence of hepatic and cerebral pathology findings characteristic of Reye's syndrome. Liver sections stained with haematoxylin and eosin showed intrahepatocytic microvesiculation (10 of 12 children) and absence of significant inflammation or necrosis (10 of 12 children). All 6 specimens of liver tissue stained with oil red O showed intrahepatocytic microvesicular fat with central hepatocytic nuclei distributed either diffusely throughout the lobule or more prominently in the lobular periphery. Liver tissue stained with the periodic-acid/Schiff method showed complete absence of stainable glycogen in 5 of 6 children. 9 of 12 children for whom information was available had cerebral oedema. It is concluded that the light-microscopy hepatic findings and the gross cerebral findings for the majority of these children with salicylate intoxication are the same as those for children with Reye's syndrome.

Auranofin in the treatment of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

Auranofin (triethylphosphine gold) was administered to 21 patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis during an open-ended, open-label, noncontrolled trial designed to establish safety and preliminary efficacy. Initial dosage was 0.1 mg/kg/day; incremental increases to 0.2 mg/kg/day were allowed. Aspirin (80 mg/kg/day), tolmetin (20 to 40 mg/kg/day), and naproxen (400 to 600 mg/m2/day) were allowed as rapidly acting anti-inflammatory agents. All patients attained measurable plasma concentrations of gold during the study. Clinically significant improvement (greater than 25%) occurred in more than half the patients with regard to the number and severity of joints with swelling, pain on motion, and tenderness. The number of joints with active arthritis decreased by at least 25% in nine of the 19 patients. Group mean changes between the initial and final visit indicated improvement in all articular disease indices measured. Eleven of 16 patients with an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate showed decreases of at least 25%. The group given the higher dosage had a greater proportion of responders with decreases in erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Four of six patients whose sera contained rheumatoid factor showed decreases in its titer. Discontinuation of auranofin was necessary in two patients because of headaches and because of hematuria and anemia associated with a severe flare of polyarticular disease, respectively. The results from this trial are sufficiently encouraging to merit a double-blind trial of auranofin in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.