Role of circulating complement and polymorphonuclear leukocyte transfusion in treatment and outcome in critically ill neonates with sepsis

Adjuvant therapy in neonatal sepsis to prevent mortality - A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite appropriate antibiotic therapy, the risk of mortality in neonatal sepsis still remains high. We conducted a systematic review to comprehensively evaluate different adjuvant therapies in neonatal sepsis in a network meta-analysis.

METHODS

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that evaluated adjuvant therapies in neonatal sepsis. Neonates of all gestational and postnatal ages, who were diagnosed with sepsis based on blood culture or sepsis screen were included. We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE and CINAHL until 12th April 2021 and reference lists. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed in duplicate. A network meta-analysis with bayesian random-effects model was used for data synthesis. Certainty of evidence (CoE) was assessed using GRADE.

RESULTS

We included 45 studies involving 6,566 neonates. Moderate CoE showed IVIG [Relative Risk (RR); 95% Credible Interval (CrI): 1.00; (0.67-1.53)] as an adjunctive therapy probably does not reduce all-cause mortality before discharge, compared to standard care. Melatonin [0.12 (0-0.08)] and granulocyte transfusion [0.39 (0.19-0.76)] may reduce mortality before discharge, but CoE is very low. The evidence is also very uncertain regarding other adjunctive therapies to reduce mortality before discharge. Pentoxifylline may decrease the duration of hospital stay [Mean difference; 95% CrI: -7.48 days (-14.50-0.37)], but CoE is very low.

CONCLUSION

Given the biological plausibility for possible efficacy of these adjuvant therapies and that the CoE from the available trials is very low to low except for IVIG, we need large adequately powered RCTs to evaluate these therapies in sepsis in neonates.

Neonatal sepsis: a systematic review of core outcomes from randomised clinical trials

BACKGROUND

The lack of a consensus definition of neonatal sepsis and a core outcome set (COS) proves a substantial impediment to research that influences policy and practice relevant to key stakeholders, patients and parents.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. In the included studies, the described outcomes were extracted in accordance with the provisions of the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) handbook and registered.

RESULTS

Among 884 abstracts identified, 90 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this review. Only 30 manuscripts explicitly stated the primary and/or secondary outcomes. A total of 88 distinct outcomes were recorded across all 90 studies included. These were then assigned to seven different domains in line with the taxonomy for classification proposed by the COMET initiative. The most frequently reported outcome was survival with 74% (n = 67) of the studies reporting an outcome within this domain.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review constitutes one of the initial phases in the protocol for developing a COS in neonatal sepsis. The paucity of standardised outcome reporting in neonatal sepsis hinders comparison and synthesis of data. The final phase will involve a Delphi Survey to generate a COS in neonatal sepsis by consensus recommendation.

IMPACT

This systematic review identified a wide variation of outcomes reported among published RCTs on the management of neonatal sepsis. The paucity of standardised outcome reporting hinders comparison and synthesis of data and future meta-analyses with conclusive recommendations on the management of neonatal sepsis are unlikely. The final phase will involve a Delphi Survey to determine a COS by consensus recommendation with input from all relevant stakeholders.

In canine bacterial pneumonia circulating granulocyte counts determine outcome from donor cells

BACKGROUND

In experimental canine septic shock, depressed circulating granulocyte counts were associated with a poor outcome and increasing counts with prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) improved outcome. Therapeutic G-CSF, in contrast, did not improve circulating counts or outcome, and therefore investigation was undertaken to determine whether transfusing granulocytes therapeutically would improve outcome.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Twenty-eight purpose-bred beagles underwent an intrabronchial Staphylococcus aureus challenge and 4 hours later were randomly assigned to granulocyte (40-100 × 109 cells) or plasma transfusion.

RESULTS

Granulocyte transfusion significantly expanded the low circulating counts for hours compared to septic controls but was not associated with significant mortality benefit (1/14, 7% vs. 2/14, 14%, respectively; p = 0.29). Septic animals with higher granulocyte count at 4 hours (median [interquartile range] of 3.81 3.39-5.05] vs. 1.77 [1.25-2.50]) had significantly increased survival independent of whether they were transfused with granulocytes. In a subgroup analysis, animals with higher circulating granulocyte counts receiving donor granulocytes had worsened lung injury compared to septic controls. Conversely, donor granulocytes decreased lung injury in septic animals with lower counts.

CONCLUSION

During bacterial pneumonia, circulating counts predict the outcome of transfusing granulocytes. With low but normal counts, transfusing granulocytes does not improve survival and injures the lung, whereas for animals with very low counts, but not absolute neutropenia, granulocyte transfusion improves lung function.

Granulocyte transfusions in critically ill children with prolonged neutropenia: side effects and survival rates from a single-center analysis

Granulocyte transfusions for neutropenic patients have been used for over 40 years, although effectiveness, indications, and both patient and donor safety remain debated. This single-center study assessed the side effects, clinical course, and survival of granulocyte transfusions in critically ill pediatric patients, with underlying hemato-oncological disorders, prolonged neutropenia, and proven or suspected severe infection. Donor-specific side effects and influence of donor-specific characteristics on patient outcome were also investigated. A median of 4.02 × 10(10) cells was collected from 39 healthy donors for 118 granulocyte concentrates. Donors reported no significant side effects. Complications for patients were frequent but mostly minor and included vomiting, hypotension, and dyspnea. In one episode of life-threatening dyspnea, association with the granulocyte transfusion could not be ruled out. Overall survival on day 100 was 61.9 %. Patients received a median of 0.13 × 10(10) cells per kg body weight. Doses above this median were associated with a significantly better survival. Lower patient weight and age-/sex-adjusted weight were also associated with better survival.

CONCLUSION

Granulocyte mobilization and collection is a safe practice. Transfusions are well tolerated in critically ill patients. Patient weight and transfused cells per kg bodyweight are major determinants of survival in pediatric patients.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Granulocyte transfusions for neutropenic patients have been used for over 40 years • The effectiveness of the technique remains controversial • Patient and donor safety remain debated • New mobilization protocols generate higher yields of granulocytes What is new: • Granulocyte collection can safely be performed • Granulocytes can safely be administered to patients • Lower patient weight and age-/sex-adjusted weight are associated with better survival rates • Patients receiving above 0.13 × 10 (10) cells per kg body weight had an excellent outcome • Further standardized, prospective studies are warranted.

Granulocyte transfusions for neonates with confirmed or suspected sepsis and neutropenia

BACKGROUND

Neonates have immature granulopoiesis, which frequently results in neutropenia after sepsis. Neutropaenic septic neonates have a higher mortality than non-neutropenic septic neonates. Therefore, granulocyte transfusion to septic neutropenic neonates may improve outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to determine the effect of granulocyte or buffy coat transfusions as adjuncts to antibiotics, after confirmed or suspected sepsis in neutropenic neonates, on all-cause mortality during hospital stay and neurological outcome at ≥ year of age. Secondary objectives were to determine the effects of granulocyte transfusions on length of hospital stay in survivors to discharge, adverse effects and immunologic outcomes at ≥ year of age.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL, proceedings of the PAS conferences and ongoing trials at clinicaltrials.gov and clinical-trials.com were searched in July 2011.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies where neutropenic neonates with suspected or confirmed sepsis were randomised or quasi-randomised to granulocyte or buffy coat transfusions at any dose or duration, and reporting any outcome of interest were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Relative risk (RR) and risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence intervals using the fixed effects model were reported for dichotomous outcomes. Pre-specified subgroup analyses were performed.

MAIN RESULTS

Four trials were eligible for inclusion. Forty-four infants with sepsis and neutropenia were randomised in three trials to granulocyte transfusions or placebo/no transfusion. In another trial, 35 infants with sepsis and neutropenia on antibiotics were randomised to granulocyte transfusion or IVIG.When granulocyte transfusion was compared with placebo or no transfusion, there was no significant difference in 'all-cause mortality' (three trials; typical RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.86; typical RD -0.05, 95% CI -0.31 to 0.21).When granulocyte transfusion was compared with intravenous immunoglobulin (one trial), there was a reduction in 'all-cause mortality' of borderline statistical significance (RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.04; RD -0.34, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.09; NNT 2.7, 95% CI 1.6 to 9.1).Pulmonary complications were the only adverse effect reported in the trials that used buffy coat transfusions. None of the trials reported on neurological outcome at one year of age or later, length of hospital stay in survivors to discharge or immunological outcome at one year of age or later.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Currently, there is inconclusive evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to support or refute the routine use of granulocyte transfusions in neutropenic, septic neonates. Researchers are encouraged to conduct adequately powered multi-centre trials of granulocyte transfusions in neutropenic septic neonates.

Revisiting the use of granulocyte transfusions in pediatric oncology patients

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical course of neutropenic pediatric oncology patients undergoing granulocyte transfusions (GTF).

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review including all children receiving GTFs between March, 1998 and June, 2000.

SETTING

Tertiary Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center.

PATIENTS

Thirteen pediatric oncology patients (age, 9 mo to 16 y) with neutropenia and proven or suspected serious infection.

INTERVENTIONS

These 13 patients received a total of 14 courses of GTFs (number of transfusions per course ranged from 1 to 43, median=4.5).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Twelve of the patients had documented infections before GTF. Ten of the 14 courses (71%) were followed by survival to hospital discharge. All 5 patients who were intubated before GTF were extubated afterward. Two early deaths occurred due to invasive Aspergillus. No significant differences in monitoring laboratories were found. Ultimately, 8 of 13 (62%) patients in this group died.

CONCLUSIONS

This case series documents the course of 13 septic neutropenic pediatric oncology patients who underwent a total of 14 GTF courses. GTFs were generally well tolerated with little decline in respiratory status or organ function. Short-term survival in this population was good whereas long-term outcome remains more difficult.

Immunotherapy in the prophylaxis and treatment of neonatal sepsis

Neonatal sepsis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the neonatal intensive care unit. The epidemiology of neonatal infections is complex; however, they are in large part secondary to developmentally immature host defense mechanisms. These immunodeficiencies, which are exaggerated in premature and sick neonates, include quantitative and qualitative deficits in phagocytes, complement components, cytokines, and immunoglobulins. Therapies that modulate or augment host defenses may attenuate the virulence of neonatal infections. In this paper, we have reviewed immunotherapies that modulate the immune system of the neonate, including: intravenous immunoglobulins, myeloid hematopoietic growth factors, and granulocyte transfusions. Future studies should focus on investigating other abnormalities of neonatal host defense and/or combined immunotherapy approaches in an attempt to circumvent the immaturity of host defense and potentially reduce both the incidence and severity of neonatal sepsis.

Granulocyte transfusions for neonates with confirmed or suspected sepsis and neutropaenia

BACKGROUND

Neonatal sepsis causes significant neonatal mortality and morbidity. Neonates, especially preterm infants, have an immaturity of granulopoeisis and have a limited capacity for progenitor cell proliferation. This results in the frequent occurrence of neutropaenia in septic neonates. Neutropaenic septic neonates have a higher mortality than neonates who are septic but not neutropaenic. Transfusion of granulocytes to septic neutropaenic neonates, therefore, may help reduce mortality and morbidity.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this review was to determine the efficacy and safety of granulocyte preparations (granulocyte and buffy coat transfusions) as adjuncts to antibiotics for the treatment of confirmed or suspected sepsis in neonates with neutropaenia in reducing all-cause mortality during hospital stay and adverse neurological outcome at a year of age or later. Secondary objectives were to determine the effects of granulocyte transfusions on length of hospital stay in survivors to discharge, adverse effects (fluid overload, transmission of blood borne infections, pulmonary complications and sensitisation to donor leukocyte antigens) and immunologic outcomes at a year of age or later.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Searches for eligible trials were made in September 2002 of the following electronic databases: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2002), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL. The proceedings of the Pediatric Academic Societies, which were published in the journal, Pediatric Research, were searched from 1987 onwards. The Cambridge Database of Scientific Abstracts (1982 onwards) and Dissertation Abstracts on disc (1960 onwards) were also searched. Communications with prominent authors in the field and additional searches in the reference lists of identified trials were performed

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised studies were included, if the participants were neonates with suspected or confirmed sepsis and neutropaenia who received granulocyte preparations (granulocyte concentrates prepared by leukophoresis or buffy coat transfusions prepared by simple centrifugation of blood) at any dose or duration compared with placebo or no granulocyte transfusion, each as adjuncts to antibiotics or compared to other adjuncts to antibiotics to treat sepsis (e.g. intravenous immunoglobulin). Studies were included if any of the following outcomes were reported: all-cause mortality during hospital stay, neurological outcome at one year of age or later, length of hospital stay in survivors at discharge, adverse effects or immunological outcome at one year or later

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trials identified by the search strategy were assessed for eligibility for inclusion in the review. Full text versions of the eligible trials were obtained. Data of interest were extracted on paper forms. Relative risk (RR) and risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence intervals using the fixed effects model were reported for dichotomous outcomes. Pre-specified subgroup analyses were done and reported.

MAIN RESULTS

Four eligible studies were identified. A total of 44 infants with sepsis and neutropaenia on antibiotics were randomised in three trials to granulocyte transfusions OR placebo/no transfusion. In another trial, 35 infants with sepsis and neutropaenia on antibiotics were randomised to granulocyte transfusion or intravenous immunoglobulin. When granulocyte transfusions were compared with placebo or no transfusion, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality [typical RR 0.89 (95% CI 0.43, 1.86), typical RD -0.05 (95% CI -0.31, 0.21)]. There was no statistical heterogeneity in the results of the included trials. When granulocyte transfusions were compared with intravenous immunoglobulin, there was a reduction in all-cause mortality of borderline statistical significance [RR 0.06 (95% CI 0.00, 1.04), RD -0.34(95% CI -0.60, -0.09), NNT 2.9 (95% CI 1.7, 11.1)]. Pulmonary complication, seen in four infants (4%), was the only adverse effect reported. This adverse effect was noticed in the two trials which used buffy coat transfusions. None of the trials reported on neurological outcome at one year of age or later, length of hospital stay in survivors to discharge or immunological outcome at one year of age or later.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Currently, there is inconclusive evidence from RCTs to support or refute the routine use of granulocyte transfusions in neonates with sepsis and neutropaenia to reduce mortality and morbidity. Researchers can be encouraged to conduct adequately powered multicentre trials of granulocyte transfusions to clarify their role in neonates with sepsis and neutropaenia. Other adjuncts to antibiotics aimed at improving host defence mechanisms such as colony stimulating factors, IVIG and pentoxifylline should also be tested in RCTs.

Perinatal immunomodulation

The fetus and the neonate are particularly vulnerable to injury caused directly by immunologic mechanisms or inflicted by infectious agents that take advantage of their relatively immature and inexperienced immune system. With increasing survival of high-risk neonates in the surfactant era, prevention/treatment of sepsis and chronic lung disease (CLD) has emerged as an area of priority in neonatal research. Considering the role of inflammatory mediators in the pathogenesis of sepsis and CLD, the clinical application of immunomodulator therapy to neonatology is perhaps more important at present than ever. Advances in molecular biology and immunology have led to development of newer immune modulator therapies that are directed towards specific cells or cytokines rather than resulting in a general suppression of the immune response. Failure of promising, newer immunomodulator therapies in sepsis trials in adults has, however, clearly documented the difficulties in diagnosing/correcting the imbalance between pro- and anti-inflammatory responses. As in the case of sepsis, development of a single magic bullet for prevention/management of a multi-factorial illness like CLD may be difficult, as prevention of prematurity - the single most important high-risk factor for CLD - is an unachievable goal at present. As new frontiers are being explored, older, well-established therapies like antenatal anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis continue to emphasize the tremendous potential of immunomodulator therapy in neonatology/perinatology. The current immunomodulators/immunotherapeutic agents with established/potential clinical applications in the perinatal period are reviewed.

Hydroxyethylstarch sedimentation by gravity ex vivo for red cell reduction of granulocyte apheresis components

BACKGROUND

When selecting only leukocyte compatible donors, the requirement of ABO compatibility limits the investigation and application of granulocyte transfusion therapy by reducing the pool of potential donors. Ex vivo hetastarch (HES) sedimentation was evaluated as a method of red blood cell (RBC) reduction of granulocyte components. The objective was to determine if this procedure consistently resulted in reduction of component packed RBC (PRBC) volume to < 5 ml, the range acceptable for infusion of ABO incompatible blood components based on guidelines set forth by the American Association of Blood Banks (AABB).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

HLA-matched, ABO-compatible sibling marrow donors were selected to donate granulocyte components, which were transfused into the allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipient as prophylaxis against infection. Three granulocyte components were collected from each of 5 donors receiving G-CSF (daily x 5). Leukapheresis (LA) began 1 day after the first G-CSF dose (Day 1), and was repeated on Days 3 and 5. LA were performed using a continuous-flow blood cell separator, with 7L blood processed during each procedure. RBC sedimentation was facilitated by administration of a 6% HES solution to the donor line. The 5 granulocyte components collected on Day 1 were not manipulated after collection. The 10 components collected on Days 3 and 5 were manipulated by ex vivo gravity sedimentation for 60 minutes followed by transfer of the buffy coat (red cell poor [RCP] fraction) to a transfer bag with residual RBCs retained in the collection bag (red cell rich [RCR] fraction). The PRBC volume and cellular composition of the components and fractions were determined.

RESULTS

When data for the 10 manipulated components were combined, the fraction of the components with < 5 ml PRBC was 0.4 in the RCP and 0.1 in the RCR fractions. All unmanipulated components contained > 5 ml PRBC. The mean PRBC volume (ml) of the RCP and RCR fractions were 6.3 and 16.4, respectively (P = .06). The mean number of RBC (x10(11)) in the RCP and the RCR fractions were .41 and 1.73, respectively (P = .03). The average proportion of cells in the manipulated components lost to the RCR fraction was 19.2% of granulocytes and 18.6% of platelets.

CONCLUSION

Ex vivo HES sedimentation, as performed, significantly reduced the number of RBCs from granulocyte components, but did not consistently result in PRBC volumes in the RCP fraction within the range acceptable for infusion of ABO incompatible blood components based on the AABB guidelines. Moreover, significant numbers of granulocytes were lost to the RCR fraction.

Granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in neonatal neutropenia

Neutropenia in neonates is often associated with sepsis, prematurity and maternal hypertension with increased risk of mortality. We describe two neonates with neutropenia treated with granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor. The total and absolute neutrophil counts showed a marked response and led to a favourable outcome. Human granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor may be used as an adjuvant therapy for neonatal neutropenia of different aetiologies.

Blood component and immunotherapy in neonatal sepsis

The future role of IVIG remains unclear. Many, but not all, studies indicate efficacy in the prevention of late-onset disease in premature infants. The role of type-specific IVIG is evolving and may hold promise for both prevention and treatment of neonatal sepsis. Granulocyte transfusions, as adjuvant therapy in neonatal sepsis, seem to be beneficial. However, the difficulty and expense of collection, as well as the advent of colony-stimulating factors, have shifted the focus away from their routine use. Colony-stimulating factors present varied and exciting potential uses, including modulating neonatal hematopoiesis. Current studies are primarily aimed at understanding their effects on neonatal hematopoiesis. Future studies will need to expand on this knowledge and examine what effects they have on treating or preventing neonatal sepsis.

Effect of fresh frozen plasma and gammaglobulin on humoral immunity in neonatal sepsis

Fresh frozen plasma and intravenous immunoglobulin are used as prophylaxis against, and for the treatment of, neonatal infection. It is assumed that any beneficial effect is mediated through the humoral immune factors contained in each preparation. The effect of fresh frozen plasma and intravenous immunoglobulin on humoral immune markers (immunoglobulins and IgG subclasses, complement components and activation products, and C reactive protein) was investigated over a 24 hour period after their randomised administration to 67 infants with suspected infection. Thirty infants without suspicion of infection were studied as controls. Compared with control infants, infants with suspected infection had increased concentrations of C reactive protein, reduced concentrations of fibronectin, and increased concentrations of the complement activation marker C3d, but similar concentrations of IgG, IgG subclasses, IgA, and IgM. After intravenous immunoglobulin treatment (500 mg/kg) concentrations of total IgG and all IgG subclasses increased, as did IgA and complement component C4. Concentrations of C reactive protein decreased after intravenous immunoglobulin treatment and were significantly lower than baseline after 24 hours. In contrast, no change in IgG or IgG subclass concentrations occurred after fresh frozen plasma administration. At 24 hours after fresh frozen plasma administration, concentrations of IgA, IgM, and C4 were significantly higher than baseline and serum IgA was significantly higher than in infants tested 24 hours after intravenous immunoglobulin treatment. These results confirm the rational basis for intravenous immunoglobulin treatment but question the value of fresh frozen plasma, particularly in the light of its attendant problems as an untreated blood product.

Randomized trial of granulocyte transfusions versus intravenous immune globulin therapy for neonatal neutropenia and sepsis

We prospectively studied newborn infants with sepsis and neutropenia who were randomly selected to receive standard supportive care and either adjuvant granulocyte transfusions or intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) infusions; 21 infants received granulocyte transfusions and 14 received IVIG infusions. Half of the patients were premature (gestational age less than or equal to 32 weeks); the average postnatal age was 5 days (range 3 to 8 days). All infants had neutropenia by the criteria of Manroe et al., and the mean average bone marrow neutrophil storage pool ranged between 35% and 37%. There were no significant differences with respect to serum IgG, IgA, IgM, and total hemolytic complement values between treatment groups or between survivors and nonsurvivors. Clinical severity as defined by hypoxia, acidosis, and hypotension was similar between treatment groups. Group B streptococcus was the most common organism identified and accounted for almost 33% of all bacterial isolates. There was a significantly different survival rate in the group receiving polymorphonuclear leukocyte transfusions (100%, 21/21) compared with the group receiving IVIG infusions (64%, 9/14; p = less than 0.03). There were no significant complications in either treatment group with respect to fluid overload, secondary infection, blood group sensitization, pulmonary complications, or graft-versus-host disease. This pilot study suggests a possible benefit of granulocyte transfusions compared with 'IVIG therapy in the adjuvant treatment of neonatal neutropenia and overwhelming bacterial sepsis.

The use of granulocyte transfusion in neonatal sepsis

Many questions are raised in this review about the role of adult donor granulocyte transfusions in the setting of overwhelming bacterial neonatal sepsis. There clearly exists a number of variables, which influence the survival and morbidity associated with bacterial sepsis. The important differences in these studies highlight the need for prospective large multicenter studies to definitely clarify these issues. Important criteria, which are yet to be established and which impact significantly, include the time of administration of adjuvant granulocytes, the number of granulocytes that need to be harvested, which group of neonates require early granulocyte transfusions, the best method for optimal and easy granulocyte collection, the frequency and intervals of granulocyte transfusions, and improved methods for the early identification of neonatal candidates who would benefit from the granulocyte transfusions. The benefits of granulocyte transfusions (ie, the improvement in morbidity and mortality) in septic neutropenic neonates must be weighed against the possible and reported side effects associated with such transfusions. Adverse reactions including graft-versus-host disease, CMV, HIV and hepatitis infection, fluid retention and pulmonary edema, blood group sensitization, and pulmonary insufficiency may all result from the use of granulocyte transfusions in a host who has evidence of developmental immaturity. All future studies must continue to evaluate these potential complications to balance and analyze the true benefits of survival with reported treatment results. Recently, a number of investigators including ourselves, have begun to examine the role of alternate adjuvant immunotherapy in enhancing neonatal host defense in the clinical setting of overwhelming bacterial sepsis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clinicopathological differences between early-onset and late-onset sepsis and pneumonia in very low birth weight infants

We performed clinicopathological studies on early-onset sepsis (5 infants, less than 72 hours of life, EOS) and late-onset sepsis (15 infants, greater than 72 hours, LOS) of very low birth weight, less than 1500 g (VLBW). In EOS, the clinical features mimic the respiratory distress syndrome and hematological changes were not observed. The lungs showed slight interstitial pneumonia with structural immaturity, hyaline membranes, hemorrhage, and minimal infiltration by polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs). The pathogen was group B streptococcus or weakly gram-negative bacilli. In LOS, pneumonia proceeded to sepsis and neutropenia with elevated numbers of circulating immature neutrophils, and increased levels of C-reactive protein were observed at the onset of sepsis. Severe pneumonia with infiltration of numerous PMNs and bacterial colonies and polymicrobial infection by nosocomial pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were common. The thymus and spleen weights varied but retained normal structure in EOS. The thymus was depleted of lymphocytes, and the spleen was hypertrophic but poorly reactive against infection in LOS. The pathogenesis of EOS is regarded as being more closely correlated with lung immaturity and circulatory disorder in early life, whereas that of LOS is associated with immunological defenses of the host, potency of the pathogens, and terminal multiple organ failure.

Current status of granulocyte transfusions to treat neonatal sepsis

Neonates are unusually susceptible to severe bacterial infections. Antibiotic therapy has been supplemented with granulocyte transfusions (GTX) to treat neonatal infections. The precise role of GTX to treat neonatal sepsis is controversial, and 11 reports (including six controlled studies) were critically analyzed. When all data are combined, 79% of 78 neonates receiving antibiotics plus GTX survived vs. 62% of 90 infants treated only with antibiotics. Among the six controlled trials, four found significantly better survival for neonates given GTX plus antibiotics. However, each of these trials can be criticized (few subjects, heterogeneous patients, defective design, inadequate granulocyte product, etc.). Although firm recommendations for GTX cannot be made currently, it seems reasonable to combine them with antibiotics to treat septic neonates that exhibit neutropenia for age and evidence of a diminished neutrophil marrow storage pool. Once the decision to transfuse is made, neonates should receive a minimum dose of 1 x 10(9) fresh neutrophils per kg per transfusion.