A pilot study of outpatient management of febrile neutropenic children with cancer at low risk of bacteremia

Optimising Antimicrobial Selection and Duration in the Treatment of Febrile Neutropenia in Children

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a frequent complication of cancer treatment in children. Owing to the potential for overwhelming bacterial sepsis, the recognition and management of FN requires rapid implementation of evidenced-based management protocols. Treatment paradigms have progressed from hospitalisation with broad spectrum antibiotics for all patients, through to risk adapted approaches to management. Such risk adapted approaches aim to provide safe care through incorporating antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) principles such as implementation of comprehensive clinical pathways incorporating de-escalation strategies with the imperative to reduce hospital stay and antibiotic exposure where possible in order to improve patient experience, reduce costs and diminish the risk of nosocomial infection. This review summarises the principles of risk stratification in FN, the current key considerations for optimising empiric antimicrobial selection including knowledge of antimicrobial resistance patterns and emerging technologies for rapid diagnosis of specific infections and summarises existing evidence on time to treatment, investigations required and duration of treatment. To aid treating physicians we suggest the key features based on current evidence that should be part of any FN management guideline and highlight areas for future research. The focus is on treatment of bacterial infections although fungal and viral infections are also important in this patient group.

Sharing Roles and Control in Pediatric Low Risk Febrile Neutropenia: A Multicenter Focus Group Discussion Study Involving Patients, Parents, and Health Care Professionals

INTRODUCTION

Reducing treatment intensity for pediatric low risk febrile neutropenia may improve quality of life, and reduce hospital-acquired infections and costs. Key stakeholders' attitudes toward early discharge regimens are unknown. This study explored perceptions of reduced therapy regimens in the United Kingdom.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three study sites were purposively selected for their approaches to risk stratification, treatment protocols, shared care networks, and geographical spread of patients. Patients aged 13 to 18 years, parents of children of all ages and health care professionals participated in focus group discussions. A constant comparison analysis was used.

RESULTS

Thirty-two participants spoke of their different roles in managing febrile neutropenia and how these would change if reduced therapy regimens were implemented, how mutual trust would need to be strengthened and responsibility redistributed. Having identified a need for discretion and a desire for individualized care, negotiation within a spectrum of control allows achievement of the potential for realized discretion. Nonattendance exemplifies when control is different and families use their assessments of risk and sense of mutual trust, along with previous experiences, to make decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

The significance of shared decision making in improving patient experience through sharing risks, developing mutual trust, and negotiating control to achieve individualized treatment cannot be underestimated.

A clinical approach to non-neutropenic fever in children with cancer

BACKGROUND

There are a limited number of studies that address non-neutropenic fever episodes in children with cancer, and no standard approach exists.

METHOD

We opt to retrospectively analyze the efficacy of the current clinical approach for management of non-neutropenic fever episodes and the associated risk factors among children with cancer at the Princess Noorah Oncology Center from May 2016 through December 2017.

RESULTS

A total of 480 non-neutropenic fever episodes were identified in 131 children, of which 62 episodes were triaged as high-risk non-neutropenic fever and 418 as low-risk non-neutropenic fever. Of those 480 non-neutropenic fever, 361 episodes (75.2%) were associated with the presence of central venous catheters. The overall failure rate of ceftriaxone mono-therapy was observed in 75.6% (11.7% in high-risk non-neutropenic fever with a mean C-reactive protein level of 21.1 (±23.2) mmol/L and 63.9% in low-risk non-neutropenic fever with a mean C-reactive protein level of 17.6 (±53.9) mmol/L). The overall bacteremia rate was 14.4%. The type of organisms isolated was mainly high-risk organisms in 59 non-neutropenic fever episodes (85.5%), OR 1.78 (95% CI: 0.45-7.04) p = 0.41. Of note, all bacteremia were associated with the presence of central venous catheter (100%). Of all the examined risk factors of outpatient treatment failure in low-risk non-neutropenic fever, only prolonged fever of more than three days were significantly associated with bacteremia OR 8.107 [95% CI: 1.744-37.691], p = 0.008. Noteworthy is that almost 43% of non-neutropenic fever episodes were associated with respiratory symptoms. This study provides a baseline for future prospective research assessing the pattern of non-neutropenic fever by focusing on associated risk factors.

Outpatient treatment for people with cancer who develop a low-risk febrile neutropaenic event

BACKGROUND

People with febrile neutropaenia are usually treated in a hospital setting. Recently, treatment with oral antibiotics has been proven to be as effective as intravenous therapy. However, the efficacy and safety of outpatient treatment have not been fully evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy (treatment failure and mortality) and safety (adverse events of antimicrobials) of outpatient treatment compared with inpatient treatment in people with cancer who have low-risk febrile neutropaenia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2018, Issue 11) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE via Ovid (from 1948 to November week 4, 2018), Embase via Ovid (from 1980 to 2018, week 48) and trial registries (National Cancer Institute, MetaRegister of Controlled Trials, Medical Research Council Clinical Trial Directory). We handsearched all references of included studies and major reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outpatient with inpatient treatment for people with cancer who develop febrile neutropaenia. The outpatient group included those who started treatment as an inpatient and completed the antibiotic course at home (sequential) as well as those who started treatment at home.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial eligibility, methodological quality, and extracted data. Primary outcome measures were: treatment failure and mortality; secondary outcome measures considered were: duration of fever, adverse drug reactions to antimicrobial treatment, duration of neutropaenia, duration of hospitalisation, duration of antimicrobial treatment, and quality of life (QoL). We estimated risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous data; we calculated weighted mean differences for continuous data. Random-effects meta-analyses and sensitivity analyses were conducted.

MAIN RESULTS

We included ten RCTs, six in adults (628 participants) and four in children (366 participants). We found no clear evidence of a difference in treatment failure between the outpatient and inpatient groups, either in adults (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.85, I2 0%; six studies; moderate-certainty evidence) or children (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.99, I2 0%; four studies; moderate-certainty evidence). For mortality, we also found no clear evidence of a difference either in studies in adults (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.29 to 3.71; six studies; 628 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) or in children (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.15 to 2.70; three studies; 329 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).According to the type of intervention (early discharge or exclusively outpatient), meta-analysis of treatment failure in four RCTs in adults with early discharge (RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.74 to 2.95; P = 0.26, I2 0%; 364 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) was similar to the results of the exclusively outpatient meta-analysis (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.62 to 2.13; P = 0.65, I2 19%; two studies; 264 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).Regarding the secondary outcome measures, we found no clear evidence of a difference between outpatient and inpatient groups in duration of fever (adults: mean difference (MD) 0.2, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.76, 1 study, 169 participants; low-certainty evidence) (children: MD -0.6, 95% CI -0.84 to 0.71, 3 studies, 305 participants; low-certainty evidence) and in duration of neutropaenia (adults: MD 0.1, 95% CI -0.59 to 0.79, 1 study, 169 participants; low-certainty evidence) (children: MD -0.65, 95% CI -0.1.86 to 0.55, 2 studies, 268 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). With regard to adverse drug reactions, although there was greater frequency in the outpatient group, we found no clear evidence of a difference when compared to the inpatient group, either in adult participants (RR 8.39, 95% CI 0.38 to 187.15; three studies; 375 participants; low-certainty evidence) or children (RR 1.90, 95% CI 0.61 to 5.98; two studies; 156 participants; low-certainty evidence).Four studies compared the hospitalisation time and found that the mean number of days of hospital stay was lower in the outpatient treated group by 1.64 days in adults (MD -1.64, 95% CI -2.22 to -1.06; 3 studies, 251 participants; low-certainty evidence) and by 3.9 days in children (MD -3.90, 95% CI -5.37 to -2.43; 1 study, 119 participants; low-certainty evidence). In the 3 RCTs of children in which days of antimicrobial treatment were analysed, we found no difference between outpatient and inpatient groups (MD -0.07, 95% CI -1.26 to 1.12; 305 participants; low-certainty evidence).We identified two studies that measured QoL: one in adults and one in children. QoL was slightly better in the outpatient group than in the inpatient group in both studies, but there was no consistency in the domains included.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient treatment for low-risk febrile neutropaenia in people with cancer probably makes little or no difference to treatment failure and mortality compared with the standard hospital (inpatient) treatment and may reduce time that patients need to be treated in hospital.

Quest for certainty regarding early discharge in paediatric low-risk febrile neutropenia: a multicentre qualitative focus group discussion study involving patients, parents and healthcare professionals in the UK

OBJECTIVES

A systematic review of paediatric low-risk febrile neutropenia found that outpatient care is safe, with low rates of treatment failure. However, this review, and a subsequent meta-ethnography, suggested that early discharge of these patients may not be acceptable to key stakeholders. This study aimed to explore experiences and perceptions of patients, parents and healthcare professionals involved in paediatric febrile neutropenia care in the UK.

SETTING

Three different centres within the UK, purposively selected from a national survey on the basis of differences in their service structure and febrile neutropenia management.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-two participants were included in eight focus group discussions.

PRIMARY OUTCOMES

Experiences and perceptions of paediatric febrile neutropenia care, including possible future reductions in therapy.

RESULTS

Participants described a quest for certainty, in which they attempted to balance the uncertainty involved in understanding, expressing and negotiating risk with the illusion of certainty provided by strict protocols. Participants assessed risk using both formal and informal stratification tools, overlaid with emotional reactions to risk and experiences of risk within other situations. The benefits of certainty provided by protocols were counterbalanced by frustration at their strict constraints. The perceived benefits and harms of previous inpatient care informed participants' appraisals of future treatment strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlighted the previously underestimated harms of admission for febrile neutropenia and the paternalistic nature of decision making, along with the frustrations and challenges for all parties involved in febrile neutropenia care. It demonstrates how the same statistics, generated by systematic reviews, can be used by key stakeholders to interpret risk differently, and how families in particular can view the harms of therapeutic options as different from the outcomes used within the literature. It justifies a reassessment of current treatment strategies for these children and further exploration of the potential to introduce shared decision making.

Meta-ethnography of experiences of early discharge, with a focus on paediatric febrile neutropenia

PURPOSE (STATING THE MAIN PURPOSES AND RESEARCH QUESTION)

Many children have no significant sequelae of febrile neutropenia. A systematic review of clinical studies demonstrated patients at low risk of septic complications can be safely treated as outpatients using oral antibiotics with low rates of treatment failure. Introducing earlier discharge may improve quality of life, reduce hospital acquired infection and reduce healthcare service pressures. However, the review raised concerns that this might not be acceptable to patients, families and healthcare professionals.

METHODS

This qualitative synthesis explored experiences of early discharge in paediatric febrile neutropenia, including reports from studies of adult febrile neutropenia and from other paediatric conditions. Systematic literature searching preceded meta-ethnographic analysis, including reading the studies and determining relationships between studies, translation of studies and synthesis of these translations.

RESULTS

Nine papers were included. The overarching experience of early discharge is that decision-making is complex and difficult and influenced by fear, timing and resources. From this background, we identified two distinct themes. First, participants struggled with practical consequences of treatment regimens, namely childcare, finances and follow-up. A second theme identified social and emotional issues, including isolation, relational and environmental challenges. Linking these, participants considered continuity of care and the need for information important.

CONCLUSIONS

Trust and confidence appeared interdependent with resources available to families-both are required to manage early discharge. Socially informed resilience is relevant to facilitating successful discharge strategies. Interventions which foster resilience may mediate the ability and inclination of families to accept early discharge. Services have an important role in recognising and enhancing resilience.

Systematic review of reduced therapy regimens for children with low risk febrile neutropenia

PURPOSE

Reduced intensity therapy for children with low-risk febrile neutropenia may provide benefits to both patients and the health service. We have explored the safety of these regimens and the effect of timing of discharge.

METHODS

Multiple electronic databases, conference abstracts and reference lists were searched. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) and prospective observational cohorts examining the location of therapy and/or the route of administration of antibiotics in people younger than 18 years who developed low-risk febrile neutropenia following treatment for cancer were included. Meta-analysis using a random effects model was conducted. I (2) assessed statistical heterogeneity not due to chance.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42014005817).

RESULTS

Thirty-seven studies involving 3205 episodes of febrile neutropenia were included; 13 RCTs and 24 prospective observational cohorts. Four safety events (two deaths, two intensive care admissions) occurred. In the RCTs, the odds ratio for treatment failure (persistence, worsening or recurrence of fever/infecting organisms, antibiotic modification, new infections, re-admission, admission to critical care or death) with outpatient treatment was 0.98 (95% confidence interval (95%CI) 0.44-2.19, I (2) = 0 %) and with oral treatment was 1.05 (95%CI 0.74-1.48, I (2) = 0 %). The estimated risk of failure using outpatient therapy from all prospective data pooled was 11.2 % (95%CI 9.7-12.8 %, I (2) = 77.2 %) and using oral antibiotics was 10.5 % (95%CI 8.9-12.3 %, I (2) = 78.3 %). The risk of failure was higher when reduced intensity therapies were used immediately after assessment, with lower rates when these were introduced after 48 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced intensity therapy for specified groups is safe with low rates of treatment failure. Services should consider how these can be acceptably implemented.

Protocol for a systematic review of reductions in therapy for children with low-risk febrile neutropenia

BACKGROUND

Febrile neutropenia is a common complication of therapy in children with cancer. Some patients are at low risk of complications, and research has considered reduction in therapy for these patients. A previous systematic review broadly considered whether outpatient treatment and oral antibiotics were safe in this context and concluded that this was likely to be the case. Since that review, there has been further research in this area. Therefore, we aim to provide a more robust answer to these questions and to additionally explore whether the exact timing of discharge, including entirely outpatient treatment, has an impact on outcomes.

METHODS/DESIGN

The search will cover MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE, CDSR, CENTRAL, LILACS, HTA and DARE. A full search strategy is provided. Key conference proceedings and reference lists of included papers will be hand searched. Prominent authors/clinicians in the field will be contacted. We will include randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials along with prospective single-arm studies that examine the location of therapy and/or the route of administration of antibiotics in children or young adults (aged less than 18 years) who attend paediatric services with fever and neutropenia due to treatment for cancer and are assessed to be at low risk of medical complications. Studies will be screened and data extracted by one researcher and independently checked by a second. All studies will be critically appraised using tools appropriate to the study design. Data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) will be combined to provide comparative estimates of treatment failure, safety and adequacy. Information from quasi-randomised trials and single-arm studies will provide further data on the safety and adequacy of regimes. Random effects meta-analysis will be used to combine studies. A detailed analysis plan, including assessment of heterogeneity and publication bias, is provided.

DISCUSSION

This study will aim to specifically define the features of a low-risk strategy that will maintain levels of safety and adequacy equivalent to those of traditional treatments. This will both inform the development of services and provide patients and families with data to help them make an informed decision about care.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42014005817.

Outpatient versus inpatient IV antibiotic management for pediatric oncology patients with low risk febrile neutropenia: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a frequent, serious complication of intensive pediatric chemotherapy regimens. The aim of this trial was to compare quality of life (QOL) between inpatient and outpatient intravenous antibiotic management of children and adolescents with low risk febrile neutropenia (LRFN).

PROCEDURE

In this randomised non-blinded trial, patients between 1 and 21 years old, receiving low/moderate intensity chemotherapy were pre-consented and, on presentation to emergency (ED) with FN satisfying low risk criteria, randomised to either outpatient or inpatient care with intravenous cefepime 50 mg/kg (12 hourly). All patients continued antibiotics for at least 48 hours, until afebrile for 24 hours and demonstrating a rising absolute neutrophil count ≥200/mm(3). Several domains of QOL were examined by daily questionnaire.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients presented to ED with 159 episodes of fever. Thirty-seven FN presentations involving 27 patients were randomised to inpatient (18) and outpatient (19) management. Combined QOL mean scores for parents were higher for the outpatient group and scores for three specific parent variables (keeping up with household tasks/time spent with partner/time spent with other children) were higher among outpatients. There was no difference in parent confidence/satisfaction in care between groups. Patients scored better in the outpatient group overall and for sleep and appetite. The mean length of fever was equivalent between groups and there were no serious adverse events attributable to cefepime or outpatient care.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient cefepime management of LRFN provided significant benefit to parents and patients across several QOL domains and appeared both feasible and safe.

Oral versus intravenous antibiotic treatment for febrile neutropenia in cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Fever occurring in a neutropenic patient remains a common life-threatening complication of cancer chemotherapy. The common practice is to admit the patient to hospital and treat him or her empirically with intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics. Oral therapy could be an alternative approach for selected patients.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of oral antibiotics versus intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy in febrile neutropenic cancer patients.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2013, Issue 1) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (1966 to January week 4, 2013), EMBASE (1980 to 2013 week 4) and LILACS (1982 to 2007). We searched several databases for ongoing trials. We checked the conference proceedings of the Interscience Conference of Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC) (1995 to 2007), and all references of included studies and major reviews were scanned.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oral antibiotic(s) to intravenous antibiotic(s) for the treatment of neutropenic cancer patients with fever. The comparison between the two could be started initially (initial oral) or following an initial course of intravenous antibiotic treatment (sequential).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial eligibility and methodological quality and extracted data. Data concerning mortality, treatment failures and adverse events were extracted from the included studies assuming an 'intention-to-treat' basis for the outcome measures whenever possible. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for dichotomous data. Risk of bias assessment was also made in line with methodology of The Cochrane Collaboration.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-two trials (3142 episodes in 2372 patients) were included in the analyses. The mortality rate was similar when comparing oral to intravenous antibiotic treatment (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.68, 9 trials, 1392 patients, median mortality 0, range 0% to 8.8%). Treatment failure rates were also similar (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.06, all trials). No significant heterogeneity was shown for all comparisons but adverse events. The effect was stable in a wide range of patients. Quinolones alone or combined with another antibiotic were used with comparable results. Adverse reactions, mostly gastrointestinal, were more common with oral antibiotics.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on the present data, oral treatment is an acceptable alternative to intravenous antibiotic treatment in febrile neutropenic cancer patients (excluding patients with acute leukaemia) who are haemodynamically stable, without organ failure, and do not have pneumonia, infection of a central line or a severe soft-tissue infection. The wide CI for mortality allows the present use of oral treatment in groups of patients with an expected low risk for mortality, and further research should be aimed at clarifying the definition of low risk patients.

Repeating blood cultures in neutropenic children with persistent fevers when the initial blood culture is negative

BACKGROUND

Febrile neutropenia is a common reason for the hospitalization of pediatric oncology patients. The initiation of antibiotics and the overall decline in rates of bacteremia, would predict a low yield of detection of bacteremia in repeated blood cultures. Despite little evidence supporting the utility of serial cultures, repeat culturing with fever persists.

PROCEDURE

To determine the rate of follow-up blood culture growth when the initial blood culture showed no bacterial growth and patient risk factors for this occurrence, we reviewed the records of oncology patients admitted to the Children's Hospital at Montefiore Pediatric Hematology/Oncology service for febrile neutropenia from 2004 to 2009.

RESULTS

We identified 457 febrile neutropenia episodes in 137 patients. The initial blood culture was positive in 84 episodes (18.4%). In 220 episodes comprising 105 patients, the initial blood culture was negative and a subsequent culture was obtained. In 24 episodes (10.9%), bacterial growth was detected in the repeat culture. Risk factors included a previous history of bacteremia and hospitalization for more than 48 hours prior to onset of fever.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with febrile neutropenia, bacteremia is detected nearly twice as frequently in initial blood cultures than in repeat blood cultures obtained when the initial blood culture is negative. Despite an initial negative blood culture, bacteremia can be detected in more than 10% of episodes when a repeat blood culture is obtained. The risk more than doubles for patients with a previous history of bacteremia or hospitalized for more than 48 hours prior to the onset of fever.

Incidence and management of infections in patients with acute leukemia following chemotherapy in general wards

We hypothesise that treating patients with acute leukaemia in general wards, with proper hygienic and sanitary practices, would result in the minimum utilisation of resources as compared with the corresponding patients receiving ICU support. For this study, the acute leukaemia patients on induction chemotherapy were kept in general wards and observed for the incidence of neutropenia, resultant neutropenic febriles, the causative organism, and the effect of empirical antimicrobial treatment protocol on the outcome of such infections. Prophylactic anti-fungal therapy and cotrimoxazole therapy improved the outcome of infections. The therapy of neutropenic fever and infections must be adapted according to the risk factors and should include early empiric antifungal therapy. It was observed that the treatment of such patients in general wards could be managed effectively, with the added advantage of optimum utilisation of resources and in a patient-friendly environment, at a reasonable cost to the patients.

Outpatient and oral antibiotic management of low-risk febrile neutropenia are effective in children--a systematic review of prospective trials

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on whether therapeutic intensity can be reduced safely in children with low-risk febrile neutropenia (FN). Our primary objective was to determine whether there is a difference in efficacy between outpatient and inpatient management of children with low-risk FN. Our secondary objective was to compare oral and parenteral antibiotic therapy in this population.

METHODS

We performed electronic searches of Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and limited studies to prospective pediatric trials in low-risk FN. Percentages were used as the effect measure.

RESULTS

From 7,281 reviewed articles, 16 were included in the meta-analysis. Treatment failure, including antibiotic modification, was less likely to occur in the outpatient setting compared with the inpatient setting (15 % versus 28 %, P = 0.04) but was not significantly different between oral and parenteral antibiotic regimens (20 % versus 22 %, P = 0.68). Of the 953 episodes treated in the outpatient setting and 676 episodes treated with oral antibiotics, none were associated with infection-related mortality.

CONCLUSION

Based on the combination of results from all prospective studies to date, outpatient and oral antibiotic management of low-risk FN are effective in children and should be incorporated into clinical care where feasible.

Health-related quality of life anticipated with different management strategies for paediatric febrile neutropaenia

Background:

To describe (1) anticipated health-related quality of life during different strategies for febrile neutropaenia (FN) management and (2) attributes of those preferring inpatient management.

Methods:

Respondents were parents of children 0–18 years and children 12–18 years receiving cancer treatment. Anticipated health-related quality of life was elicited for four different FN management strategies: entire inpatient, early discharge, outpatient oral and outpatient intravenous (i.v.) therapy. Tools used to measure health-related quality of life were visual analogue scale (VAS), willingness to pay and time trade off.

Results:

A total of 155 parents and 43 children participated. For parents, median VAS scores were highest for early discharge (5.9, interquartile range 4.4–7.2) and outpatient i.v. (5.9, interquartile range 4.4–7.3). For children, median scores were highest for early discharge (6.1, interquartile range 4.6–7.2). In contrast, the most commonly preferred strategy for parents and children was inpatient in 55.0% and 37.2%, respectively. Higher current child health-related quality of life was associated with a stronger preference for outpatient management.

Conclusion:

Early discharge and outpatient i.v. management are associated with higher anticipated health-related quality of life, although the most commonly preferred strategy was inpatient care. This data may help with determining more cost-effective strategies for paediatric FN.

Risk prediction in pediatric cancer patients with fever and neutropenia

BACKGROUND

To identify predictors for 2 risk measures-"proven invasive bacterial infection or culture-negative sepsis (IBD)" and "clinical complications (CC)"-in pediatric cancer patients with fever and neutropenia (FN).

METHODS

Records of 390 patients with FN hospitalized over 2 years were reviewed. For the 332 who met inclusion criteria, one FN episode was randomly selected. Independent predictors at presentation were analyzed using multiple regression models. Optimal cut-off risk prediction scores were determined. These models were validated by bootstrap analysis.

RESULTS

Patients' median age was 6.0 years; 66% had an underlying diagnosis of leukemia. Independent predictors of IBD (n = 56) were absolute neutrophil count <100, temperature at presentation > or =39.0 degrees C, "sick" clinical appearance, and underlying diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia. A total weighted score <24 reliably identified patients at low risk for IBD. Independent predictors of CC (n = 47) were relapse of malignancy, non-white race, "sick" clinical appearance, and underlying diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia. A total weighted score <19 predicted patients at low risk for CC. Of those misclassified as low risk, 11 of 12 with IBD and 3 of 9 with CC had the outcome within 24 hours of presentation. Of the remaining patients classified as low-risk for IBD and CC, 99.5% and 97.1%, respectively, remained outcome-free after 24 hours of observation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies predictors of infection/complications in pediatric patients with FN, establishes clinical cut-off scores and highlights the importance of the initial clinical impression and 24 hours of observation. These prediction models warrant prospective validation.

Randomized controlled trial comparing oral amoxicillin-clavulanate and ofloxacin with intravenous ceftriaxone and amikacin as outpatient therapy in pediatric low-risk febrile neutropenia

BACKGROUND

Outpatient oral therapy is infrequently used in pediatric low-risk febrile neutropenia (LRFN) as there is insufficient data regarding its equivalence as compared with parenteral therapy.

METHODS

This is a single institutional, randomized control trial in pediatric LRFN aged 2 to 15 years, in which 123 episodes in 88 patients were randomized to outpatient oral ofloxacin 7.5 mg/kg 12 hourly and amoxycillin-clavulanate 12.5 mg/kg 8 hourly or outpatient intravenous (IV) ceftriaxone 75 mg/kg and amikacin 15 mg/kg once daily after blood cultures.

RESULTS

Out of 119 evaluable episodes, one-third were leukemia patients in maintenance and rest were solid tumors. Success was achieved in 55/61 (90.16%) and 54/58 (93.1%) in oral and IV arms, respectively, (P=0.56). There were 3 hospitalizations but no mortality. Median days to resolution of fever, absolute neutrophil count >500/mm(3) and antibiotic use were 3, 5, and 6 days in both arms. There were 5 blood culture isolates (3 gram-positive and 2 gram-negative bacteria). Failure of outpatient therapy was associated with perianal infections, bacteremia, febrile neutropenia onset before day 9 of chemotherapy in solid tumors and Vincristine, actinomycin-D, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for rhabdomyosarcoma. All gram-positive isolates were successes, whereas both gram-negative isolates were failures. Diarrhea in IV arm and Vincristine, actinomycin-D, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in the oral arm predicted failure in subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient therapy is efficacious and safe in pediatric LRFN. There was no difference in outcome in oral versus IV outpatient therapy. Amoxycillin-clavulanate and ofloxacin may be the oral regimen of choice.

Cytokine concentrations are not predictive of bacteremia in febrile neutropenic patients

Assay of cytokines and C reactive protein (CRP) in different periods of febrile neutropenia may be helpful for early defining the risk in severe infections. We determined serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1beta), and CRP in 22 previously untreated patients with various malignancies. Samples were obtained in four different clinical periods of febrile neutropenia; prior to chemotherapy, afebrile neutropenic period after chemotherapy, febrile neutropenic period, and recovery period. When compared to sex-and age-matched group of healthy subjects, IL-6, IL-8, sIL-2R, and CRP levels were found to be elevated in all periods. The highest levels were encountered in the febrile neutropenic period. For predictivity purposes, the afebrile neutropenic period was the most important period. Serum sIL-2R, IL-6, IL-8 and CRP levels were elevated in this period. IL-8 levels showed the most stable elevation through different stages of febrile neutropenia. Serum IL-8 levels were found to have the most reliable and stable elevation in different clinical stages of febrile neutropenia. Nevertheless, IL-8 is not able to discriminate among risk groups and cannot be used as a predictive factor.

Early hospital discharge versus continued hospitalization in febrile pediatric cancer patients with prolonged neutropenia: A randomized, prospective study

BACKGROUND

Hospitalization with single or multi-agent antibiotic therapy has been the standard of care for treatment of febrile neutropenia in cancer patients. We hypothesized that an empiric antibiotic regimen that is effective and that can be administered once-daily will allow for improved hospital utilization by early transition to outpatient care.

PROCEDURE

Febrile pediatric cancer patients with anticipated prolonged neutropenia were randomized between a regimen of once-daily ceftriaxone plus amikacin (C + A) and imipenem monotherapy (control). Afebrile patients on C + A satisfying "Early Discharge Criteria" at 72 hr continued treatment as outpatients. We compared the outcome, adverse events, duration of hospitalization, and cost between both groups.

RESULTS

A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 129 febrile episodes in pediatric cancer patients with prolonged neutropenia. No adverse events were seen in 32 children (84% of study arm) treated on an outpatient basis. We found a statistically significant difference between the duration of hospitalization of the C + A group [median 5 days] and control [median 9 days](P < 0.001), per episode antibiotic cost (P < 0.001) and total episode cost (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the response to treatment at 72 hr or after necessary antimicrobial modifications.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that pediatric febrile cancer patients initially considered at risk for sepsis due to prolonged neutropenia can be re-evaluated at 72 hr for outpatient therapy. The convenience, low incidence of adverse effects, and cost benefit of the once-daily regimen of C + A may be particularly useful to reduce the overall treatment costs and duration of hospitalization.

Current approaches for risk stratification of infectious complications in pediatric oncology

Infections are serious complications of cytoreductive therapy in pediatric cancer patients presenting with febrile neutropenia. It is standard of care to initiate empirical intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics until the fever and neutropenia resolve. However, it might be effective and safe to allow for early hospital discharge in certain subgroups of patients. Two strategies for risk stratification of pediatric cancer patients with regard to infectious complications are discussed in this review: (1) clinical risk parameters and laboratory measures to assist therapeutic management at presentation with fever in neutropenia, and (2) investigations of individual genetic susceptibility factors to tailor potential prophylactic approaches. Given the data available from a significant number of small studies, a large prospective non-inferiority trial is essential to assess low-risk clinical factors and additional laboratory or genetic markers for their predictive value.

Management of febrile neutropenia in pediatric oncology patients: a Canadian survey

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, febrile neutropenia in pediatric oncology patients has been managed aggressively with hospital admission and intravenous antibiotics. Recent studies suggest that less intensive interventions are effective for selected children. Study of Canadian practice patterns may help better understand the current context of care for these patients.

PROCEDURE

We carried out a cross-sectional mailed survey of the 17 tertiary pediatric centers in Canada. A 36-item questionnaire gathered information on oncology department characteristics, the existence of protocols for management of febrile neutropenia, use of outpatient therapy or early discharge, criteria used to identify patients at low risk, and opinions of oncologists.

RESULTS

A total of 16 (94%) completed questionnaires were returned, reflecting a treatment population of approximately 2,100 children with febrile neutropenia/year. Three out of seventeen centers carry out exclusively traditional management. The remaining 14 offer modified treatment for low risk children. The majority (n = 10) carry out an early discharge approach. Two thirds of the episodes of febrile neutropenia are treated this way with good results. The rest (n = 4) implement complete outpatient management. Approximately 120 patients benefit from this annually, with a reportedly high success rate. Most specialists agreed on the benefits of decreased hospitalization for children with cancer. However, about half considered the level of evidence is not sufficient to fully implement complete outpatient management.

CONCLUSIONS

Variations in the treatment of pediatric febrile neutropenia have been extensively implemented across Canada. However more evidence, ideally in the form of multicenter clinical trials, appears to be needed to further safely modify practice.

Early hospital discharge with oral antimicrobial therapy in patients with hematologic malignancies and low-risk febrile neutropenia

Although consensus exists relating criteria for the identification of low-risk patients with febrile neutropenia, no clear indication on how to manage these patients has been so far provided particularly in outpatients affected by hematologic malignancies. The feasibility and safety of early discharge was prospectively evaluated in 100 outpatients with hematologic malignancies and febrile neutropenia. A strategy considering the risk-index of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) was applied. High-risk patients were entirely managed at hospital. Low-risk patients were early discharged if they were afebrile since 48 h and not on supportive therapy requiring hospitalization. Out of 90 low-risk episodes, in 69 instances (76.7%), patients were discharged after a median of 4 days and continued home therapy with oral cefixime (78%) or other antibiotics. Only five outpatients (7.2%) had fever recurrence. Twenty-one low-risk patients were not early discharged due to worsening conditions (three deaths), need of multiple daily dose therapy, or discharge refuse. No clinical characteristic was able to predict the eligibility for early discharge. The MASCC risk-index is a useful aid in the identification of high-risk febrile neutropenia needing whole in-hospital treatment. As for low-risk patients, hospitalization at least in the first days of fever is required. Cefixime could be included among the oral antibacterial drugs to be used in the outpatient treatment of adult patients with febrile neutropenia.

Feasibility of integrated home/hospital physiotherapeutic support for children with cancer

PURPOSE

Children suffering from cancer often have to undergo physiotherapy that either extends the duration of in-patient hospitalisation or requires more frequent visits to the outpatient clinic. To improve care and to decrease the length of hospitalisation of children being treated at the Dept. of Haematoloy/Oncology of the Gaslini Children's Hospital, a programme of Home Care was set up in April 2000.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In June 2003, rehabilitation was added to the procedures that were feasible at home and included i.v. therapy administration, blood examinations, transfusion and/or psychological support, as well as palliative care for terminally ill children. The physiotherapy sessions were done in the ward, in the Rehabilitation Unit Gym, or at home, depending on the clinical conditions and the needs of the child and the family.

RESULTS

Between June 2003 and May 2005, 46 children, whose median age was 7 years (range 6 months-21 years) suffering from CNS tumours (13), leukaemia (13), neuroblastoma (7), bone tumours (6), sarcoma (4) and lymphoma (3), underwent 1,398 physiotherapy sessions for neuro-motor re-education (534), motor rehabilitation (485), strain re-education and training (250), respiratory care (79), or to improve comfort during the terminal phase of the disease (50). To maintain continuity of care, the treatments were performed at home (931), in the hospital ward (282), or in the gymnasium of our Physiotherapy Service (185).

CONCLUSION

The physiotherapist was able to start or to continue assistance at home or in the hospital, and to keep up the programme based on the child's needs. Integrated home/hospital physiotherapy for children suffering from cancer is feasible and is useful for maintaining continuity of treatment without lengthening hospitalisation.

The evolution towards ambulatory and day-case management of febrile neutropenia

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is only second to chemotherapy administration as a cause of hospital admission during treatment for cancer. As FN may signify serious or life-threatening infection, management protocols have focussed on trying to prevent adverse outcomes in these patients. However, it is now possible to identify a subset of patients with FN at low risk of life-threatening complications in whom duration of hospitalisation and intensity of therapy can be reduced safely. This review discusses how the management of FN has evolved to enable patients identified as low risk to be treated on specific low risk management strategies, with an emphasis on some of the practical considerations for the implementation of such strategies.

Length of Stay and Mortality Associated With Febrile Neutropenia Among Children With Cancer

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for longer length of stay (los) and mortality among hospitalized children with cancer who have febrile neutropenia.

Methods

This study involved analysis of longitudinal data from the University HealthSystem Consortium database from 1995 to 2002. All patients who were 21 years or younger, with diagnostic codes for both neoplastic disease and febrile neutropenia at discharge, were included.

Results

A total of 12,446 patients were identified for the study. The los was 5 days or less for 6,799 patients, and greater than 5 days for 5,647 patients. The mortality rate was 3%. On bivariate analysis, race, age, cancer type, and associated complications (bacteremia/sepsis, hypotension, pneumonia, and fungal infections) were significantly associated with longer length of stay and death. On multivariate analysis, age group, race, cancer type (acute myeloid leukemia, multiple cancers v acute lymphoblastic leukemia), and the complication variables were significantly associated with increased risk of longer los and death. Certain types of cancer (Hodgkin's disease, osteosarcoma/Ewing’s sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, compared with acute lymphoblastic leukemia) and year of discharge after 1995 were significantly associated with a reduced risk of longer length of stay and/or mortality.

Conclusion

Race, age group, year of discharge, associated complications, and cancer type were significantly associated with risk of longer los and mortality. These factors may potentially help in identifying high-risk patients who might benefit from targeted antibiotic therapy or prophylactic hematopoietic growth factor support.

[Bacteraemia risk criteria in the paediatric febrile neutropenic cancer patient]

INTRODUCTION

Cancer patients with febrile neutropenia are not a homogeneous group with respect to risk of bacterial infections. Some authors have proposed that febrile cancer patients with low risk factors of bacteraemia could be managed at home with domiciliary antibiotic treatment. The objectives are: to determine the incidence of bacteraemia in our cancer patients who have febrile neutropenia; and to identify the low-risk factors so that the patients can be managed at home using domiciliary antibiotic treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Clinical review of paediatric haemato-oncology disease admitted to our hospital in 2002 suffering from febrile neutropenia.

RESULTS

We describe a total of 62 episodes of febrile neutropenia in 30 patients; 24 episodes in haematology patients and 38 episodes in oncology patients. High-risk criteria are age <1 year, poor bone-marrow recovery, chemotherapy within 10 days of the episode, rapid fast neutropenia, leukaemia in relapse, uncontrolled solid cancer, and cardiac or nephrology disease. Based on the number of risk-factors, patients with two or less risk-factors have an incidence of bacteraemia of 6.7% (1/16) and patients with three or more risk factors have an incidence of bacteraemia of 32.6% (15/46); p<0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence of bacteraemia is similar to the reviewed literature; probability of bacteraemia increases with the number of individual risk factors, and patients with low risk of bacteraemia could be managed on an outpatient basis using domiciliary antibiotic treatment.

Randomized comparison of antibiotics with and without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in children with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group

PURPOSE

To determine if granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) with empirical antibiotics accelerates febrile neutropenia resolution compared with antibiotics without it.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible children were treated without prophylactic G-CSF and presented with fever (temperature >38.3 degrees C) and neutropenia afterward. Patients with acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome were excluded. Assignments were randomized between G-CSF (5 microg/kg/day) or none beginning within 24 hr of antibiotics. Subcutaneous administration was recommended, but intravenous G-CSF was allowed. Patients remained on study until absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >500/microl and > or =48 hr without fever.

RESULTS

One of 67 patients enrolled was ineligible, 59 had acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Thirty-four were assigned to antibiotics, 32 to G-CSF plus antibiotics. Adding G-CSF significantly reduced neutropenia and febrile neutropenia recovery times. Median days to febrile neutropenia resolution was nine earlier with G-CSF (4 vs. 13 days) (P < 0.0001). However, there was no difference in the resolution of fever between arms. Hospitalization median was shorter by 1 day with G-CSF (4 vs. 5 days) (P = 0.04). There was no difference in the duration of IV and oral antibiotic treatment, addition of antifungal therapy, and shock incidence. A trend for decreased incidence of late fever with G-CSF was noted (6.3 vs. 23.5%) (P = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding G-CSF to empiric antibiotic coverage accelerates chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia resolution by 9 days in pediatric patients, mainly with ALL, which results in a small but significant difference in the median length of hospitalization.

Treatment of pediatric febrile neutropenia in the era of vancomycin-resistant microbes

PURPOSE

The increasing frequency of Gm(+) infections in febrile neutropenic (FN) patients has resulted in increased use of vancomycin (VN). Likely as a result, VN-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) has become a significant concern in FN patients. We sought to understand how the emergence of VN resistant microbes has changed the antibiotic management of pediatric FN.

METHODS

A questionnaire was distributed by e-mail to responsible investigators of the Children's Oncology Group.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty responses were analyzed. Forty-four percent initially used monotherapy, with 82% of those using ceftazidime. Twenty-seven used VN with another agent, generally ceftazidime. After the emergence of VRE and VN-resistant staphylococcus (VRS), monotherapy increased to 58%. Ceftazidime continued to be most frequently used. There was a 57% reduction in the use of VN with 88% of centers not currently using VN in their initial treatment of FN. Forty-seven percent of the centers that continue to use VN have VRE, while 90% that have discontinued its use have VRE/VRS.

CONCLUSIONS

Ours is the first study to survey current practices in the treatment of pediatric FN and to document changes in practice patterns due to emerging antibiotic resistance patterns. We demonstrate increased use of monotherapy for FN, and a 57% decrease in the use of VN. Local considerations influence antibiotic choices with a significant difference in VRE prevalence between those centers that continue to use VN as compared to those that have discontinued it.

Oral versus intravenous antibiotic treatment for febrile neutropenia in cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Fever occurring in a neutropenic patient remains a common life-threatening complication of cancer chemotherapy. The common practice is to admit the patient to hospital and treat empirically with intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics. Oral therapy could be an alternative approach for selected patients.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of oral antibiotics versus intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy in febrile neutropenic cancer patients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Cancer Network Register of trials (November 2002), the Cochrane Library (issue 2, 2002), MEDLINE (1966 to 2002), EMBASE (January 1980 to 2002) and LILACS (1982 to 2002). We searched several databases for ongoing trials. We checked the conference proceedings of the Interscience Conference of Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC) 1995 to 2002 and all references of included studies and major reviews were scanned.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing oral antibiotic/s to intravenous antibiotic/s for the treatment of neutropenic cancer patients with fever. The comparison between the two could be started initially (initial oral), or following an initial course of intravenous antibiotic treatment (sequential).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial eligibility, methodological quality and extracted data. Data concerning mortality, treatment failures and adverse events were extracted from included studies assuming an "intention-to-treat" basis for the outcome measures whenever possible. Relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous data were estimated.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen trials (median mortality 0, range 0 to 8.8%) were included in the analyses. The mortality rate was similar comparing oral to intravenous antibiotic treatment (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.62, 7 trials, 1223 patients). Treatment failure rates were also similar (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.05, all trials). No significant heterogeneity was shown for all comparisons but adverse events. This effect was stable in a wide range of patients. Quinolones alone or combined with another antibiotics were used with comparable results. Adverse reactions, mostly gastrointestinal were more common with oral antibiotics.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on the present data, oral treatment is an acceptable alternative to intravenous antibiotic treatment in febrile neutropenic cancer patients (excluding patients with acute leukaemia) who are haemodynamically stable, without organ failure, not having pneumonia, infection of a central line or a severe soft-tissue infection. The wide confidence interval for mortality allows the present use of oral treatment in groups of patients with an expected low risk for mortality, and further research should be aimed at clarifying the definition of low risk patients.

Early hospital discharge followed by outpatient management versus continued hospitalization of children with cancer, fever, and neutropenia at low risk for invasive bacterial infection

PURPOSE

To compare outcome and cost of ambulatory versus hospitalized management among febrile neutropenic children at low risk for invasive bacterial infection (IBI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Children presenting with febrile neutropenia at six hospitals in Santiago, Chile, were categorized as high or low risk for IBI. Low-risk children were randomly assigned after 24 to 36 hours of hospitalization to receive ambulatory or hospitalized treatment and monitored until episode resolution. Outcome and cost were determined for each episode and compared between both groups using predefined definitions and questionnaires.

RESULTS

A total of 161 (41%) of 390 febrile neutropenic episodes evaluated from June 2000 to February 2003 were classified as low risk, of which 149 were randomly assigned to ambulatory (n = 78) or hospital-based (n = 71) treatment. In both groups, mean age (ambulatory management, 55 months; hospital-based management, 66 months), sex, and type of cancer were similar. Outcome was favorable in 74 (95%) of 78 ambulatory-treated children and 67 (94%) of 71 hospital-treated children (P = NS). Mean cost of an episode was US 638 dollars (95% CI, 572 dollars to 703 dollars) and US 903 dollars (95% CI, 781 dollars to 1,025 dollars) for the ambulatory and hospital-based groups, respectively (P =.003).

CONCLUSION

For children with febrile neutropenia at low risk for IBI, ambulatory management is safe and significantly cost saving compared with standard hospitalized therapy.

Antibiothérapie ambulatoire chez les enfants neutropéniques fébriles

NEW STRATEGIES: Fever in a neutropenic patient requires the rapid initiation of a broad spectrum antibiotic and continued until correction of the neutropenia. Several studies have been conducted recently in order to define the populations of children in whom the antibiotherapy could be suspended early without risk of relapse of fever and/or severe infection. Moreover, the high costs of hospitalisation and the limited number of beds in the departments of Paediatric Oncology Haematology have led to studies on the feasibility of an antibiotherapy at home. THE EARLY SUSPENSION OF THE ANTIBIOTHERAPY: The criteria retained in several studies for the early suspension of the antibiotherapy have been: apyrexia for at least 24 hours, a satisfactory clinical status, the absence of positive haemocultures and haematological signs showing the end of aplasia in patients in remission of their disease. Studies have confirmed the possibility of early suspension of intravenous antibiotics in low-risk patients, without fever and without microbiological signs. THE PLACE OF ORAL ANTIBIOTICS: In several comparative studies, the success rate with intravenous antibiotics and oral antibiotics was comparable. The rate of failures was greater in patients with severe initial neutropenia. OUTPATIENT ANTIBIOTICS: In children, 2 types of studies have been conducted. The first studied the feasibility of an antibiotherapy at home following antibiotherapy in the hospital in order to reduce the costs and duration of hospitalisation. The others proposed an antibiotherapy at home from the start, either with the intravenous or the oral route. Following all these studies, it appeared that, in certain low-risk neutropenic children with fever, not only the antibiotics could be suspended before the complete correction of the neutropenia, but also a large spectrum oral antibiotherapy could replace the intravenous antibiotherapy and outpatient treatment would therefore be feasible.

Outpatient management of febrile neutropenia in children with cancer

The objectives of this article are to review the studies that have examined the safety and feasibility of outpatient management for children with febrile neutropenia, and to provide recommendations as to which patient populations and treatment strategies are most appropriate for this approach. The outpatient strategies have included either complete outpatient management or employment of early discharge, with the latter methodology predominating in most published studies. Common criteria relied upon to identify children with febrile neutropenia at low risk of serious infections included evidence of hematopoietic recovery and/or an absolute monocyte count >/=100/mm(3), and the absence of both comorbidity and culture positivity. A wide variety of different antibacterial regimens have been employed, with some trials investigating either early discontinuation of treatment or conversion to an oral administration strategy. Trials performed to date among this low risk population indicate a very low rate of readmission and/or complications. Some studies have also estimated substantial overall cost savings with this approach. However, many of these trials are significantly underpowered to detect the low rate of serious complications in the pediatric population with febrile neutropenia. At present, the available evidence indicates that a carefully chosen subpopulation of children with febrile neutropenia can be safely managed on an outpatient basis. Regardless of setting, current clinical guidelines for febrile neutropenia management indicate that all children with febrile neutropenia should be managed with appropriate antibacterial therapy until resolution of febrile neutropenia. Treatment with either an oral antibacterial regimen as initial therapy, or early discontinuation of antibacterial therapy in the outpatient setting should remain investigational at the present time.

Ciprofloxacin in treatment of fever and neutropenia in pediatric cancer patients

This article reviews clinical trials of outpatient management of fever and neutropenia in pediatric cancer patients. The syndrome of fever and neutropenia is discussed, and strategies of identifying patients at low risk for complex or fatal infections are described. A number of clinical trials in a wide range of clinical settings and countries have demonstrated that low risk pediatric cancer patients with fever and neutropenia can be prospectively identified and safely treated as outpatients. In addition outpatient management has been shown to be less costly than conventional intravenous therapy in hospitalized patients. Oral fluoroquinolones, including ciprofloxacin, have been used as a component of therapy in several trials because of their ease of administration and their activity against the majority of pathogenic bacteria causing illness in this group. The article also discusses the role of antibiotic prophylaxis of fever and neutropenia in certain high risk settings, such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In selected high risk patients, prophylactic use of limited spectrum fluoroquinolones such as ciprofloxacin may reduce the incidence of Gram-negative bacteremias. Use of fluoroquinolone therapy as prophylaxis, however, is controversial because of concerns about an emergence of resistant organisms. Prudent use of fluoroquinolones as therapy and prophylaxis is essential to prolonging the benefits of this class of compounds.

Evaluation and treatment of fever in the non-neutropenic child with cancer

PURPOSE

To document the current approach to the evaluation and treatment of febrile non-neutropenic children with cancer by surveying American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (ASPHO) members.

METHODS

Five hundred ninety-five ASPHO members were sent questionnaires polling their current practices in the evaluation and treatment of clinically stable, febrile (oral temperature of 38 degrees C x2, or >or=38.3 degrees C), non-neutropenic (absolute neutrophil count > 500/microL) pediatric cancer patients who have no identifiable bacterial infection. Patients were assigned to one of four groups based on the presence or absence of a central venous catheter (CVC) and no source (NS) or presumed viral source (VS) for fever.

RESULTS

Three hundred sixteen ASPHO members (53%) responded and 300 questionnaires were evaluable. If a CVC was present, respondents universally drew blood cultures (99% NS, 96% VS) from the CVC, but only one third drew peripheral blood cultures (33% NS, 29% VS). If a CVC was not present, the majority of respondents (80% NS, 61% VS) drew peripheral cultures. ASPHO members started empiric antibiotics more frequently in patients with a CVC (69% NS, 55% VS) than in patients without a CVC (33% NS, 23% VS). Most did not admit these patients to the hospital (40% CVC and NS, 33% CVC and VS, 22% no CVC and NS, 19% no CVC and VS). ASPHO members with more years of experience were more likely to obtain peripheral blood cultures if a CVC was present and to admit a patient without a CVC.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly all respondents obtained a blood culture from the CVC in the initial assessment of the febrile, non-neutropenic patient with a CVC, but other evaluation and management practices varied considerably.

Ceftriaxone in febrile neutropenia

Standard management of febrile neutropenia requires prompt administration of empirical, broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, since febrile neutropenia is associated with a significant risk of infectious complications and mortality. Risk-assessment models have been developed that differentiate febrile patients with neutropenia according to their risk for infectious complications and/or mortality and have prompted a change in the management of these patients. Ceftriaxone is a long-lasting, broad spectrum cephalosporin which has demonstrated efficacy in this indication in many publications. The role of ceftriaxone in febrile neutropenia will be discussed based on literature analysis and on the author's experience.

Home care for children following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The quality of life of patients who undergo haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is affected by long periods of hospitalisation for the treatment of several complications. On this basis, 28 children who underwent 29 HSCTs were included in the Home Care (HC) programme of the Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Department of the Gaslini Children's Hospital to be discharged earlier. A total of 17 children were assisted for haematologic follow-up and support therapy administration. The remaining children were followed up for graft- versus-host disease and/or cytomegalovirus infection. Overall activity consisted of 1232 i.v. therapies, 501 blood tests, 58 red blood cell or platelet transfusions, 107 procedures on Central Venous Catheter. Median duration of the assistance per child was 25 days (range 1235) for a total of 1598 days. A total of 822 accesses at home replaced 459 and 363 out-patient and in-patient days of hospitalisation. The average cost per patient receiving HC (EUR 4,252) was significantly lower (P<0.01) when compared to the average cost per patient admitted to the hospital to undergo the same procedures (EUR 14,693). This report shows that HC is feasible for children following HSCT, that it reduces the discomfort of the patients and their families, and that it reduces costs.

Economic comparison of home-care-based versus hospital-based treatment of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in children

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare health-care resource utilization and outcomes among children treated for low-risk febrile neutropenia (FN) in a hospital-based setting with those treated in a home-care-based setting.

METHODS

The perspective of this retrospective, cohort study was the health payer. We collected health-care utilization and treatment outcome data from medical records of 63 children (26 boys and 37 girls) with low-risk, chemotherapy-induced FN who were treated at the University of Arizona (27 children, the hospital-based group) and University of New Mexico (36 children, the home-care-based group). We identified 144 FN episodes (72 episodes in each group). Health-care utilization included physician visits, home-care visits, laboratory visits, outpatient visits, hospital days, intensive care unit days, medical tests and studies, and medications used to manage FN (e.g., filgrastim, antimicrobials, and ancilliary drugs and supplies). We applied uniform charges, based on those used at the University of New Mexico in 1998. We collected outcomes of the FN treatment (success vs. failure and time to resolution, defined as number of days of antibiotic therapy). Rates of positive blood cultures during treatment were also compared. Data were analyzed using nonparametric Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous data and chi-square analysis for categorical data. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying the amount of total resource utilization, as well as utilization of specific health-care resources.

RESULTS

There was no difference in outcome; all episodes of treatment in both groups resulted in successful recovery from FN. Time to resolution of FN was 8.3 +/- 2.7 days for home-care FN episodes versus 7.3 +/- 3.6 days for hospital FN episodes (P =.064). Median charge per FN episode was significantly (P<.001) greater when managed in the hospital compared to home care (9392 US dollars vs. 5893 US dollars). There was greater use of laboratory and radiographic studies in the hospital-based patients (P <.01). However, children in the home-care-based group were more often treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim, median charge 1085 US dollars vs. 451 US dollars, P <.001), and median antibiotic charges were higher (2523 US dollars vs. 1526 US dollars, P <.001). Positive blood cultures were more common among the hospital-based FN treatments (30.6 vs. 11.1%, P=.012).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that management of low-risk FN in a home-care-based setting was associated with significantly lower median total charges with no differences in outcome.

Ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin as continuation treatment of febrile neutropenia in pediatric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The empiric administration of anti-microbial therapy significantly reduces the morbidity and mortality associated with febrile neutropenic episodes in oncology patients. Outpatient empiric antibiotic therapy can be safely administered to a subset of febrile neutropenic patients at low risk for clinical complications.

PROCEDURE

Pediatric cancer patients presenting with febrile neutropenia after non-myeloablative chemotherapy and who met institutional criteria for early hospital discharge following a minimum of 48-hr inpatient empiric intravenous ceftazidime were eligible for the study. The feasibility and efficacy of an outpatient continuation therapy of oral ciprofloxacin (CPR) 25-30 mg/kg/day divided BID and amoxicillin (AMX) 30-50 mg/kg/day divided TID was assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty febrile neutropenic episodes in 26 patients were treated with outpatient oral CPR/AMX therapy. Oral CPR/AMX therapy was feasible in 28 (93%) and efficacious in 26 (87%) of treatment episodes. CPR/AMX was discontinued due to abdominal pain and diarrhea (n = 2), recurrent fever (n = 3), or gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 1). No patient developed new bacteremia or cardiopulmonary decompensation. Bone/joint pain or gastrointestinal symptoms occurred in 27% of treatment episodes. Duration of neutropenia, lower absolute neutrophil count (ANC) (< 100/mm(3)) at start of oral antibiotic therapy and active malignant disease were associated with failure of oral antibiotic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

It is feasible to administer oral CPR/AMX as continuation antibiotic therapy for a selected subgroup of febrile neutropenic episodes defined after initial hospitalization and empiric antibiotic therapy. Prospectively randomized trials will be required to analyze adequately the efficacy of an oral CPR/AMX outpatient antibiotic regimen for treatment of febrile neutropenia in pediatric oncology patients.

Outpatient therapy for febrile neutropenia: clinical and economic implications

Although febrile episodes in neutropenic patients remain a potentially life-threatening complication of anticancer chemotherapy, considerable progress has been achieved in understanding this issue. Febrile neutropenic patients represent a heterogeneous population that displays a very variable risk for serious medical complications. It has also been ascertained that in low-risk patients, the standard of care can be safely and effectively shifted from traditional hospital-based, parenteral, empiric, broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy to outpatient treatment, even for the entire duration of the febrile episode. Furthermore, in the last years some risk assessment models have been developed to identify, at the onset of febrile episodes, low-risk neutropenic patients who are most likely to have a favourable outcome (and who can effectively and safely be treated on an outpatient basis). With respect to traditional hospital-based therapy, the outpatient treatment of low-risk patients is associated with several advantages, including a conspicuous cost saving. Some strategies for inpatient therapy, such as switching from intravenous to oral antibacterials and early discharge, can allow some cost containment; however, the most substantial decrease in costs can be obtained by using outpatient treatment over the entire febrile episode, especially by using oral antibacterials. In spite of the considerable number of clinical studies published over the past 20 years, only limited pharmacoeconomic data on this issue are available. Future comparative studies between outpatient and inpatient treatment of febrile neutropenia, in addition to clinical outcomes (e.g. survival, time to clinical response), should therefore include the following: (i) a detailed analysis of total costs, specifying the setting of outpatient treatment and the method of administration of antimicrobial agents (home nursing, self administration or treatment at infusion centres or at a low-care unit of the hospital); (ii) cost of inpatient treatment if outpatient therapy fails; and (iii) out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the patients.

Fever and neutropenia in cancer patients: the diagnostic role of cytokines in risk assessment strategies

Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy are susceptible to bacterial infections. Therefore, all neutropenic cancer patients with fever receive standard therapy consisting of broad-spectrum antibiotics and hospitalization. However, febrile neutropenia in cancer patients is often due to other causes than bacterial infections. Therefore, standard therapy should be re-evaluated and new treatment strategies for patients with variable risk for bacterial infection should be considered. This paper reviews the changing spectrum of microorganisms and resistance of microorganisms to antibiotics in infection during neutropenia and discusses new strategies for the selection of patients with low-risk for bacterial infection using clinical and biochemical parameters such as acute phase proteins and cytokines. These low-risk patients may be treated with alternative therapies such as oral antibiotics, early discharge from the hospital or outpatient treatment.

Continuous infusion of ceftazidime for patients with breast cancer and multiple myeloma receiving high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

This prospective study was performed to examine the safety and efficacy of a continuous infusion of ceftazidime in patients who developed febrile neutropenia after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) and to determine if the underlying disease represents a risk factor for infectious complications. From September 1995 to May 2000, 55 patients with breast cancer (BC, group I, 54 females, one male) and 32 patients with multiple myeloma (MM, group II, 10 female, 22 male) were included in this study. The febrile patients received a 2 g intravenous bolus of ceftazidime, followed by a 4 g continuous infusion over 24 h using a portable infusion pump. If the fever persisted for 72 h a glycopeptide antibiotic was added. The median age was 42 years (range 22-59) in group I and 52 years (range 35-63) in group II. Thirty-five BC patients (64%) and 20 MM patients (63%) responded to the monotherapy with ceftazidime. After addition of a glycopeptide antibiotic, an additional 11 BC patients vs 10 MM patients became afebrile. The causes of fever in group I were fever of unknown origin (FUO) in 49 patients, microbiologically documented infection (MDI) in five patients, and clinically documented infection (CDI) in one patient. The causes of fever in group II were FUO in 22 patients, MDI in eight patients and CDI in two patients. Forty-one febrile episodes in BC patients (75%) and 22 episodes in the MM patients (69%) were successfully managed by out-patient treatment, resulting in a saving of an average of 20 days of inpatient care. Significantly more episodes of MDI and CDI occurred in patients with MM (P = 0.05). The results indicate that BC and MM patients with febrile neutropenia after HDCT and PBSCT can be treated as outpatients with close monitoring to ensure safety. This approach represents a better use of health care resources.

Evolving concepts of management of febrile neutropenia in children with cancer

BACKGROUND

Recent investigations of febrile neutropenia in pediatric cancer patients have identified subsets of low-risk patients who can be managed with less antibiotic therapy than previously recommended standards.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

PubMed and Medline were searched for prospective trials and reviews of febrile neutropenia in children. Magnitude and duration of fever and neutropenia, comorbidities, and therapeutic strategies were examined.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven prospective trials and five reviews were identified. The child with cancer and low-risk febrile neutropenia is clinically well and afebrile within 24-96 hr of antibiotic therapy and has evidence of marrow recovery with a rising phagocyte count. Disqualifying comorbidities include leukemia at diagnosis or in relapse, uncontrolled cancer, age under 1 year, medical condition(s) that would otherwise require hospitalization and social or economic conditions that may potentially compromise access to care or compliance. Therapeutic strategies include parenteral or oral antibiotics in the hospital with early discharge or parenteral antibiotics in the outpatient setting followed by oral or parenteral therapy and daily reassessment. Although as many as 25% of low-risk patients require modification of therapy and/or hospitalization, life-threatening or fatal infection is exceptional.

CONCLUSION

One-third to one-half the children with febrile neutropenia are at low-risk of serious infection. In the context of clinic trials, they can be safely managed with inpatient or outpatient strategies that maintain close follow-up and reduce the burden of antibiotic therapy. Adoption of these alternative strategies as the standard of care should proceed with caution guided by written protocols.

Value of electronic data for model validation and refinement: bacteremia risk in children with fever and neutropenia

BACKGROUND

Validating published risk models in a different time and setting can be a labor-intensive process. Data in electronic format provide the potential to test the validity of risk models without labor-intensive chart reviews and data capture. The authors attempted to use readily available electronic data to find appropriate cases and to validate and refine a previously developed risk model for predicting bacteremia in children with cancer who had fever and neutropenia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

By applying a largely automated case-finding algorithm to linked, electronic clinical and administrative data systems, the authors identified and acquired data regarding 157 episodes of fever and neutropenia in children with cancer admitted to a children's hospital during an 11-month period in 1997. The authors applied a previously developed and validated risk model for bacteremia to this 1997 cohort by assessing the odds ratios among risk groups. The model assigns encounters with absolute monocyte count of 100 cells or more/mm3 to a low-risk group and encounters with an absolute monocyte count of less than 100 cells/mm3 to intermediate-risk (temperature <39.0 degrees C) or high-risk (> or = 39.0 degrees C) groups. In addition, the authors explored whether the new data would have generated the same model. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to determine whether there were additional independent predictors of bacteremia. Recursive partitioning of admission absolute monocyte count and temperature was used to assess whether similar cutpoints would be found.

RESULTS

There were 12 episodes of bacteremia (7.6%) among the 157 encounters. The previously developed model correctly predicted increasing rates of bacteremia in this 1997 cohort, ranging from 2.5% in the low-risk group (one episode in a child with an infected central line) to 24% in the high-risk group. The odds ratio for the high-risk versus intermediate-risk group was 4.09 (95% confidence interval 1.05-15.91), comparable to the odds ratio of 3.96 in the previously published derivation cohort (95% confidence interval 1.4-11.1). Multivariate analysis of the new data revealed no independent risk factors for bacteremia other than admission absolute monocyte count and temperature. Recursive partitioning of absolute monocyte count and temperature generated risk categories that were somewhat different from those of the original model. The new data yielded three categories: low risk (temperature < or = 39.5 degrees C and absolute monocyte count >10/mm3), intermediate risk (temperature < or = 39.5 degrees C and absolute monocyte count < or = 10/mm3), and high risk (temperature >39.5 degrees C).

CONCLUSIONS

Existing electronic data provide an efficient means for case-finding and model validation and refinement. The previously developed bacteremia model had good but not optimal predictive performance in the new data set. Admission absolute monocyte count and temperature remain significant risk factors for bacteremia. Redefining the risk categories, including a much lower cutpoint for admission absolute monocyte count, improved the model's discrimination, which suggests that predictive models need periodic updating.

Evaluation of risk prediction criteria for episodes of febrile neutropenia in children with cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of risk stratification of children with cancer and febrile neutropenia using a simple set of criteria from data available to the clinician at the time of the patient's presentation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study is a retrospective cohort study of all children with cancer admitted to a single institution with fever and neutropenia (defined as an absolute neutrophil count < 500 cells/mm3) in a 1-year period. Patients were defined a priori as low risk if they were outpatients at the time of presentation with febrile neutropenia, had an anticipated duration of neutropenia less than 7 days, and had no significant comorbidity. All others were considered high risk. Data was analyzed by first admission for each patient and secondarily for all admissions for febrile neutropenia.

RESULTS

There were 188 admissions in 104 patients for febrile neutropenia during the study period. Of these 47% were high risk and 53% were low risk. The duration of fever was not significantly different in the two groups. However, the duration of neutropenia and the length of hospital stay were significantly longer in the high-risk group. The frequency of bacteremia, other documented infection, and serious medical complications was significantly different in the two groups. Overall, the rate of any adverse event was 4% in the low-risk group versus 41% in the high-risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

Simple criteria available to the clinician at the time of evaluation of the child with cancer who has fever and neutropenia allow the selection of a population at low risk for bacteremia or serious medical complication. A prospective study is planned using these risk criteria, evaluating outpatient oral antibiotic therapy in low-risk children with cancer.

Clinical parameters associated with low bacteremia risk in 1100 pediatric oncology patients with fever and neutropenia

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, children with malignant disease who present with fever and neutropenia are hospitalized for parenteral antibiotics. More recently, outpatient strategies have been proposed for lower risk cohorts of such patients. The authors sought to identify clinical and laboratory parameters that are associated with a low risk of bacteremia in children with malignant disease who presented with febrile neutropenia.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective cohort of children with malignant disease and fever with neutropenia was established in three pediatric oncology centers over a 5-year period. A total of 1171 episodes of febrile neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] < 500 cells per mm(3)) were identified in children with malignant disease age > 1 year. The endpoints examined were 1) bacteremia and 2) intensive care unit admission or death related to bacteremia. The odds ratio was used to determine which of the following admission parameters and cut-off values were associated with the lowest risk for bacteremia: ANC, absolute phagocyte count (APC), absolute monocyte count (AMC), platelet count, and admission temperature.

RESULTS

A total of 189 episodes of bacteremia were identified among the 1171 episodes of febrile neutropenia (14% bacteremia). Only 11 of 1171 episodes (0.9%) resulted in intensive care unit admission, and 3 of these patients died. All 11 patients had an AMC < 30 cells per mm(3). The lowest frequency of bacteremia (6.1%) occurred in the children with an admission AMC of > or = 155 cells per mm(3). None of the patients identified as low risk by AMC required an intensive care unit admission or died. No level of ANC, APC, temperature, or platelet count was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the risk for bacteremia in the patient population.

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse outcomes due to bacteremia are infrequent in pediatric oncology patients who present with fever and neutropenia are treated with parental antibiotics. Patients with fever and neutropenia and an AMC value of > or = 155 cells per mm(3) have the lowest risk for bacteremia and may be potential candidates for outpatient management.

Risk assessment and risk-based therapeutic strategies in febrile neutropenia

Different approaches have developed over time regarding the empirical antimicrobial therapy of fever in neutropenic patients. The use of intravenous antibiotics remains the standard approach. Clinical criteria and 'low-risk' prediction rules have been developed that help select patients in whom oral therapy is well tolerated and who may be eligible for outpatient management. Comorbidity and clinical status at presentation remain important criteria in the risk-assessment process. Outpatient management requires additional assessment of non-medical criteria. Patients without documented infection and who have responded to initial therapy may benefit from simplified therapy such as a switch to oral drugs and/or outpatient management. Discontinuation of therapy may be considered in selected cases. Risk assessment in neutropenic patients with persistent unexplained fever is challenging. Available data suggest that broadening of the antibacterial coverage is of limited value. Instead, definition of the risk of fungal infection by using clinical criteria, imaging and laboratory studies, as well as the identification of those patients likely to benefit from antifungal therapy, appear to be of critical importance.