Ability to remove immunoglobulins and anti-ganglioside antibodies by plasma exchange, double-filtration plasmapheresis and immunoadsorption

Changes in Water Properties in Human Tissue after Double Filtration Plasmapheresis-A Case Study

Double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) is a blood cleaning technique that enables the removal of unwanted substances from the blood. In our case study, we performed near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy measurements on the human hand tissue before and after a specific DFPP treatment (INUSpheresis with a TKM58 filter), along with NIR measurements of the substances extracted via DFPP (eluate). The spectral data were analyzed using the aquaphotomics approach. The analysis showed that the water properties in the tissue change after DFPP treatment, i.e., an increase in small water clusters, free water molecules and a decrease in hydroxylated water as well as superoxide in hydration shells was noted. The opposite effect was observed in the eluates of both DFPP treatments. Our study is the first that documents changes in water spectral properties after DFPP treatments in human tissue. The changes in tissue water demonstrated by our case study suggest that the positive physiological effects of DFPP in general, and of INUSpheresis with the TKM58 filter in particular, may be associated with improvements in water quality in blood and tissues.

Immunoadsorption and Plasma Exchange in Seropositive and Seronegative Immune-Mediated Neuropathies

The inflammatory neuropathies are disabling conditions with diverse immunological mechanisms. In some, a pathogenic role for immunoglobulin G (IgG)-class autoantibodies is increasingly appreciated, and immunoadsorption (IA) may therefore be a useful therapeutic option. We reviewed the use of and response to IA or plasma exchange (PLEx) in a cohort of 41 patients with nodal/paranodal antibodies identified from a total of 573 individuals with suspected inflammatory neuropathies during the course of routine diagnostic testing (PNAb cohort). 20 patients had been treated with PLEx and 4 with IA. Following a global but subjective evaluation by their treating clinicians, none of these patients were judged to have had a good response to either of these treatment modalities. Sequential serology of one PNAb+ case suggests prolonged suppression of antibody levels with frequent apheresis cycles or adjuvant therapies, may be required for effective treatment. We further retrospectively evaluated the serological status of 40 patients with either Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) or chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), and a control group of 20 patients with clinically-isolated syndrome/multiple sclerosis (CIS/MS), who had all been treated with IgG-depleting IA (IA cohort). 32 of these patients (8/20 with CIDP, 13/20 with GBS, 11/20 with MS) were judged responsive to apheresis despite none of the serum samples from this cohort testing positive for IgG antibodies against glycolipids or nodal/paranodal cell-adhesion molecules. Although negative on antigen specific assays, three patients' pre-treatment sera and eluates were reactive against different components of myelinating co-cultures. In summary, preliminary evidence suggests that GBS/CIDP patients without detectable IgG antibodies on routine diagnostic tests may nevertheless benefit from IA, and that an unbiased screening approach using myelinating co-cultures may assist in the detection of further autoantibodies which remain to be identified in such patients.

Prognostic factors and complication rates for double-filtration plasmapheresis in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute immune-mediated demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy that could lead to disabilities if not properly treated. There are only limited data on the prognostic factors and complications when using double-filtration plasmapheresis in these patients. We reviewed the medical records of 60 GBS patients who underwent double-filtration plasmapheresis as the first-line therapy at a tertiary care teaching hospital. The severity of disease was evaluated at different time points using disability scores. Functional outcome was defined as good (GBS disability score 0 to 2) or poor (GBS disability score 3 to 6) at 28 days after admission. The cohort included 22 women and 38 men with a mean age of 50 ± 18 years. In univariate logistic regression analysis, potential factors associated with poor outcome include an older age (P = 0.101), the absence of preceding respiratory tract infection (P = 0.043), mechanical ventilation (P = 0.016), a lower hematocrit (p = 0.072), a lower serum sodium level (P = 0.153) and a higher disability score on admission (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, a higher disability score on admission was associated with a poorer outcome (OR, 5.61; 95% CI, 2.34 to 13.43; P < 0.001), whereas the presence of prodromal upper respiratory tract infection correlated with a better outcome (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.59; P = 0.009). Among 60 patients, eleven (18.3%) have various complications attributed to plasmapheresis treatment. Six patients (10.0%) developed deep vein thrombosis and two experienced catheter-related infection (3.3%). Hypotension, allergy and hemolysis occurred in one patient each (1.7%). In conclusion, we describe our experiences of using DFPP in the treatment of GBS. The pretreatment severity score was the most significant predictor of treatment outcome, suggesting that early referral and timely treatment are important. Potential complications such as catheter-related infection and deep vein thrombosis should be monitored carefully.

Immunoadsorption in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy with unsatisfactory response to first-line treatment

BACKGROUND/AIMS

First-line treatment options for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) are corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and plasma exchange. In a significant number of patients, first-line therapy fails, and long-term maintenance treatment still remains a therapeutic challenge. Immunoadsorption (IA) may be an alternative to classical plasma exchange in the therapy of immune-mediated neurologic diseases. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate efficacy and safety of IA in patients with CIDP with unsatisfactory response to first-line treatment options.

METHODS

CIDP patients received adjunct IA treatment using tryptophan-immune adsorbers. The inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment disability (INCAT) score was used to grade disability and monitor treatment effects.

RESULTS

In total, 14 CIDP patients were analyzed. Ten patients were treated in hospital. After one IA treatment series, the INCAT score decreased significantly in all 10 patients. Four of these 14 patients were treated in outpatient clinics using long-term maintenance IA with 1-2 treatments per week. In these 4 patients, effects of long-term maintenance IA resulted in an improvement of overall disability. In all patients, IA was safe, well tolerated, and no severe adverse effects occurred.

CONCLUSION

IA could be an effective and safe option for CIDP patients with unsatisfactory response to first-line treatment options and for long-term maintenance treatment.

Factors influencing outcome in Guillain–Barré Syndrome: comparison of plasma adsorption against other treatments

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to evaluate which factors influence the outcome of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), focusing on the choice of treatments.

METHODS

Sixty-three GBS patients were retrospectively studied and the following factors were evaluated: sex, age, days from onset of disease to the start of treatment, severity of symptoms, prior infection, autonomic dysfunction, bulbar palsy, anti-ganglioside antibody, and disease form, as well as the choice of treatment. Plasma adsorption (PA, n=39), plasma exchange (PE, n=14), or immunoglobulin treatment (IVIg, n=10) were performed in this study. Outcomes were evaluated using the functional grading scale (FGS) of Hughes.

RESULTS

The number of days needed for one functional grade improvement was significantly longer in the elderly, the severe symptom group, and patients with acute motor axonal form, and days needed for two functional grade improvement was significantly longer in the elderly, patients with autonomic dysfunction, and acute motor axonal form. The choice of treatments (PA, PE, or IVIg) did not significantly influence the outcome as determined by both univariate and multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Although patient age, symptoms, and disease form influenced the outcome, treatment methods did not significantly influence the outcome. Since PA does not result in a risk of unknown infection, choosing a PA treatment may be justified, especially for patients (or doctors) who may be anxious about a possibility of unknown infection.

Tryptophan-immobilized Column-based Immunoadsorption as the Choice Method for Plasmapheresis in Guillain-Barre Syndrome

Plasmapheresis is widely performed as treatment for patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) in the acute phase. As tryptophan-immobilized column-based immunoadsorption (Tr-IA) is a safer method than either double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) or plasma exchange (PE), we investigated whether or not Tr-IA is as effective as other methods, and should be selected as the procedure of choice in patients with GBS. We retrospectively compared clinical outcomes, using Hughes grading, in GBS patients treated with Tr-IA, DFPP or PE. The outcome in the Tr-IA group was also compared historically with patients treated by PE in seven previous studies. We studied 34 patients with GBS: 20 were treated with Tr-IA, 11 with DFPP, and 3 with PE. The age, sex, duration from onset to initiation of treatment, and Hughes grade at entry did not differ among the Tr-IA, DFPP and PE groups. There was no significant difference in outcomes among these three groups, nor was there a significant difference between the outcomes in the Tr-IA and DFPP groups with respect to subgroups of Hughes grade at entry. Also, our Tr-IA group did not show a different outcome from the previously reported patients treated with PE. The frequency of complications in our Tr-IA group is significantly lower than that in both our DFPP group, and in the previously reported cases of patients treated with PE. Tr-IA, DFPP and PE have almost the same efficacy in patients with GBS, but Tr-IA is recommended as the plasmapheresis method of choice because of its safety.

Plasmaperfusion on triptophan columns can improve the clinical outcome of patients affected with myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is a neuromuscular disease often associated with thymic pathology due to neuromuscular transmission impairment by circulating antibodies directed against the cholinergic postsynaptic receptor on the neuromuscular junction (Anti-AchR-Ab). The treatment of MG includes cholinesterase inhibitors, steroids and thymectomy. Plasmapheresis can remove Anti-AchR-Ab but more recently plasma-perfusion (PP), a more specific apheresis for selective removal of noxious plasma components, has been developed.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To study the effect of PP treatment, performed by using specific immunocolumns for Anti-AchR-Ab, on the clinical outcome of MG patients non-responder to steroid therapy or thymectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We treated 8 patients suffering from severe MG by a cycle of 6 sessions of PP. We used columns containing triptophan as a specific ligand for Anti-AchR-Ab. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment we used functional tests (muscular tests, respiratory function, electromyography) and laboratory tests (Anti-AchR-Ab; immunoglobulins, complement fractions, immunocomplexes).

RESULTS

After one to three PP sessions, early clinical improvement in bulbar and respiratory symptoms were found in all patients and EMG showed improvement of neuromuscular transmission. Serum concentration of immunological markers decreased progressively and significantly during the treatment. Clinical improvements were progressive despite the tendency for Anti-AchR-Ab to reach initial values between one session and another. We observed no side effects due to the type of immunocolumns used.

CONCLUSIONS

Triptophan columns appear to be able to remove large quantities of Anti-AchR-Ab and immunological markers from plasma. Our experience shows that PP performed using triptophan columns in patients suffering from severe MG provides good clinical results, improving patients' outcome, without any risk linked to the procedure.

Plasma immunoadsorption therapy for Guillain-Barré syndrome: critical day for initiation

Immunoadsorption plasmapheresis (IAPP) is a method of removing circulating immune factors that is used to treat Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). We retrospectively analyzed the data on our GBS patients. In 21 patients treated with IAPP, linear regression analysis showed that the time from the onset of symptoms to the initiation of IAPP was correlated with the time required for improvement by one Hughes functional grade. We investigated the critical day for initiating treatment, which we defined as the day when initiation of IAPP was significantly more likely to improve function by at least one Hughes grade when compared with the outcome in patients receiving supportive therapy (non-IAPP group). The critical day was found to be day 6 after the onset of GBS.

Plasma exchange versus double filtration plasmapheresis in the treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome

Previous studies have shown that both plasma exchange (PE) and double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) are effective treatments in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). Whether PE and DFPP have similar effects in GBS is not clear. This report compares the therapeutic effectiveness of PE and DFPP in GBS patients treated in 3 major hospitals in northern Taiwan. A total of 102 patients were included in this survey, including 39 with PE (hereafter PE group) and 63 with DFPP (hereafter DFPP group). Both groups showed significant improvement of disability scores after treatment. However, time to onset of effect was shorter (5.6 +/- 3.5 versus 7 +/- 3.4 days, p < 0.05), and changes of disability scores were more prominent (1.3 +/- 0.8 versus 0.8 +/- 0.8, p < 0.05) in the PE group than the DFPP group. Mortality and outcome after 6 months were not different between the 2 groups. In conclusion, both PE and DFPP are effective treatments in GBS. PE was superior to DFPP in short-term effectiveness. The long-term effectiveness was not different.

Apoptosis in neurones exposed to cerebrospinal fluid from patients with multiple sclerosis or acute polyradiculoneuropathy

Primary cultures of murine cerebellar granule neurones were exposed to cerebrospinal fluid from patients with subtypes of multiple sclerosis or acute polyradiculoneuropathy (Guillain-Barré syndrome) for 2 days. Cells were then stained with Hoechst 33342 or terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labelling (TUNEL) to detect apoptotic bodies. The results were compared with control cultures exposed to cerebrospinal fluid from patients with no known neurological disease or deficit. There was no significant difference in the level of apoptosis induced between these controls and cultures not exposed to cerebrospinal fluid at all. Cultures exposed to cerebrospinal fluid samples from patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis did not have higher levels of apoptosis than cells exposed to controls, regardless of whether the sample was taken during relapse or remission. However, a significant increase in apoptosis was observed in cultures exposed to cerebrospinal fluid from patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis, and apoptosis correlated with disease severity. This supports the existence of biochemical differences between subgroups of multiple sclerosis. A significant increase in apoptosis was also induced by cerebrospinal fluid samples from patients with acute polyradiculoneuropathy, suggesting the presence of neurotoxic factor(s) here also. The relevance to disease pathology is unclear.

Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for Guillain-Barré syndrome with IgG anti-GM1 antibody

To compare the effects of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy and plasmapheresis for the IgG anti-GM1-positive subtype of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), clinical and electrophysiological recoveries were analyzed in 24 patients treated with IVIg (n = 10) or plasmapheresis (n = 14). At entry, there were no significant differences between the two patient groups in age, sex, clinical severity (Hughes grade), sum scores of distally evoked amplitudes of compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs), and frequency of Campylobacter jejuni infection. The patients treated with IVIg had significantly lower Hughes grade scores 1, 3, and 6 months after onset (P = 0.03), and a higher probability to regain independent locomotion at 6 months [P(logrank) = 0.044]. In the IVIg group, markedly rapid recovery (improvement by two or more Hughes grade scores within 4 weeks) was more frequent (6 of 10 vs. 3 of 14, P = 0. 03), and delayed recovery (unable to walk independently at 6 months) was less frequent (0 of 10 vs. 4 of 14, P = 0.06). CMAP sum score at 6 months tended to be greater for the IVIg group (P = 0.07). For the IgG anti-GM1-positive subgroup of GBS patients, IVIg therapy may be a more efficacious treatment than plasmapheresis.

Therapeutic apheresis in myasthenia gravis

Plasma exchange (PE) is an easily applicable technique for rapid and massive removal of antibodies, and its beneficial role is well established in the management of myasthenia gravis (MG), an antibody-mediated disorder of the neuromuscular junction. PE is useful in myasthenic crisis, in most severe forms of MG before thymectomy, in the early postoperative period, and in cases of symptom worsening during tapering or initiation of immunosuppressive therapy. Clinical efficacy varies from 55% to 100%, and improvement rarely persists for more than 4-10 weeks; thus immunosuppressive therapy has to be associated. New apheretic techniques (double filtration plasmapheresis, immunoadsorption systems with staphylococcal protein A columns or thryptophan-polyvinyl alcohol gel columns) that allow the selective removal of IgG and anti-AChR antibody were recently used in the management of MG with positive effects. Whether their therapeutic effect and cost effect prove more favorable than those obtained by PE still must be demonstrated.

Hemodynamic effects of immunoadsorption and subsequent immunoglobulin substitution in dilated cardiomyopathy: three-month results from a randomized study

OBJECTIVES

The objective of our study was to assess the hemodynamic effects of immunoadsorption (IA) and subsequent immunoglobulin G (IgG) substitution in comparison with the effects of conventional medical treatment in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).

BACKGROUND

Various circulating cardiac autoantibodies have been detected among patients suffering from DCM. These antibodies are extractable by IA.

METHODS

Patients with DCM (n = 18, New York Heart Association III-IV, left ventricular ejection fraction <30%) and who were on stable medication participated in the study. Hemodynamic measurements were performed using a Swan-Ganz thermodilution catheter. The patients were randomly assigned either to the treatment group with IA and subsequent IgG substitution (IA/IgG group, n = 9) or to the control group without IA/IgG (n = 9). In the IA/IgG group, the patients were initially treated in one IA session daily on three consecutive days. After the final IA session, 0.5 g/kg of polyclonal IgG was substituted. At one-month intervals, IA was then repeated for three further courses with one IA session daily on two consecutive days, until the third month.

RESULTS

After the first IA course and IgG substitution, cardiac index (CI) increased from 2.1 (+/-0.1) to 2.8 (+/-0.1) L/min/m2 (p < 0.01) and stroke volume index (SVI) increased from 27.8 (+/-2.3) to 36.2 (+/-2.5) ml/m2 (p < 0.01). Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) decreased from 1,428 (+/-74) to 997 (+/-55) dyne x s x cm(-5) (p < 0.01). The improvement in CI, SVI and SVR persisted after three months. In contrast, hemodynamics did not change throughout the three months in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunoadsorption and subsequent IgG substitution improves cardiovascular function in DCM.

Treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory neuropathies

Experimental models have suggested potential new treatments for human inflammatory neuropathy, but current practice is largely based on empirical trials. Evidence from randomized trials supports the use of intravenous immunoglobulin in Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block (MMNCB). In Guillain-Barré syndrome and CIDP intravenous immunoglobulin is equivalent to but more convenient than plasma exchange. In MMNCB adequate comparative studies of intravenous immunoglobulin and plasma exchange have not been performed. Corticosteroid treatment is beneficial in CIDP, but not in Guillain-Barré syndrome and may worsen MMNCB. More randomized trials and systematic reviews are needed to improve the evidence base for clinical practice.