Amiodarone reduces the incidence of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting

Early clinical outcomes of two regimens of prophylactic antibiotics in cardiac surgical patients with delayed sternal closure

BACKGROUND

Delayed sternal closure (DSC) can be a lifesaving approach for certain patients who have undergone cardiac surgery. The value of the type of prophylactic antibiotics in DSC is still debatable.

AIM

To investigate clinical outcomes of different prophylactic antibiotic regimens in patients who had DSC after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational single-center study. Fifty-three consecutive patients who underwent cardiac surgery and had an indication for DSC were included. Patients were subjected to two regimens of antibiotics: Narrow-spectrum and broad-spectrum regimens.

RESULTS

The main outcome measures were length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and mortality. Of the 53 patients, 12 (22.6%) received narrow-spectrum antibiotics, and 41 (77.4%) received broad-spectrum antibiotics. The mean age was 59.0 ± 12.1 years, without significant differences between the groups. The mean duration of antibiotic use was significantly longer in the broad-spectrum than the narrow-spectrum group (11.9 ± 8.7 vs 3.4 ± 2.0 d , P < 0.001). The median duration of open chest was 3.0 (2.0-5.0) d for all patients, with no difference between groups (P = 0.146). The median duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly longer in the broad-spectrum group [60.0 (Δ interquartile range (IQR) 170.0) h vs 50.0 (ΔIQR 113.0) h, P = 0.047]. Similarly, the median length of stay for both ICU and hospital were significantly longer in the broad-spectrum group [7.5 (ΔIQR 10.0) d vs 5.0 (ΔIQR 5.0) d, P = 0.008] and [27.0 (ΔIQR 30.0) d vs 19.0 (ΔIQR 21.0) d, P = 0.031]. Five (9.8%) patients were readmitted to the ICU and 18 (34.6%) patients died without a difference between groups.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic broad-spectrum antibiotics did not improve clinical outcomes in patients with DSC post-cardiac surgery but was associated with longer ventilation duration, length of ICU and hospital stays vs narrow-spectrum antibiotics.

Navigating the Incidence of Postoperative Arrhythmia and Hospitalization Length: The Role of Amiodarone and Other Antiarrhythmics in Prophylaxis

Antiarrhythmic drugs play a pivotal role in managing and preventing arrhythmias. Amiodarone, classified as a class III antiarrhythmic, has been used prophylactically to effectively prevent atrial fibrillation postoperatively in cardiac surgeries. However, there is a lack of consensus on the use of amiodarone and other antiarrhythmic drugs as prophylaxis to reduce the occurrence of all types of postoperative arrhythmias in cardiac and non-cardiac surgeries. A comprehensive PubMed query yielded 614 relevant papers, of which 52 clinical trials were analyzed. The data collection included the class of antiarrhythmics, timing or method of drug administration, surgery type, type of arrhythmia and its incidence, and hospitalization length. Statistical analyses focused on prophylactic antiarrhythmics and their respective reductions in postoperative arrhythmias and hospitalization length. Prophylactic amiodarone alone compared to placebo demonstrated a significant reduction in postoperative arrhythmia incidence in cardiac and non-cardiac surgeries (24.01%, p<0.0001), and it was the only treatment group to significantly reduce hospitalization length versus placebo (p = 0.0441). Prophylactic use of class 4 antiarrhythmics versus placebo also demonstrated a significant reduction in postoperative arrhythmia incidence (28.01%, p<0.0001), and while there was no significant statistical reduction compared to amiodarone (4%, p=0.9941), a lack of abundant data provides a case for further research on the prophylactic use of class 4 antiarrhythmics for this indication. Amiodarone prophylaxis remains a prime cornerstone of therapy in reducing postoperative arrhythmia incidence and hospitalization length. Emerging data suggests a need for a broader exploration of alternative antiarrhythmic agents and combination therapies, particularly class 4 antiarrhythmics, in both cardiac and non-cardiac surgeries. This meta-analysis depicts the effectiveness of amiodarone, among other antiarrhythmics, in postoperative arrhythmia incidence and hospitalization length reduction in cardiac and non-cardiac surgeries.

Effect of Continuous Electrocardiogram Monitoring on Detection of Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation After Hospitalization for Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) occurring after cardiac surgery is associated with adverse outcomes. Whether POAF persists beyond discharge is not well defined.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether continuous cardiac rhythm monitoring enhances detection of POAF among cardiac surgical patients during the first 30 days after hospital discharge compared with usual care.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This study is an investigator-initiated, open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial conducted at 10 Canadian centers. Enrollment spanned from March 2017 to March 2020, with follow-up through September 11, 2020. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, enrollment stopped on July 17, 2020, at which point 85% of the proposed sample size was enrolled. Cardiac surgical patients with CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, female sex) score greater than or equal to 4 or greater than or equal to 2 with risk factors for POAF, no history of preoperative AF, and POAF lasting less than 24 hours during hospitalization were enrolled.

INTERVENTIONS

The intervention group underwent continuous cardiac rhythm monitoring with wearable, patch-based monitors for 30 days after randomization. Monitoring was not mandated in the usual care group within 30 days after randomization.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was cumulative AF and/or atrial flutter lasting 6 minutes or longer detected by continuous cardiac rhythm monitoring or by a 12-lead electrocardiogram within 30 days of randomization. Prespecified secondary outcomes included cumulative AF lasting 6 hours or longer and 24 hours or longer within 30 days of randomization, death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, non-central nervous system thromboembolism, major bleeding, and oral anticoagulation prescription.

RESULTS

Of the 336 patients randomized (163 patients in the intervention group and 173 patients in the usual care group; mean [SD] age, 67.4 [8.1] years; 73 women [21.7%]; median [interquartile range] CHA2DS2-VASc score, 4.0 [3.0-4.0] points), 307 (91.4%) completed the trial. In the intent-to-treat analysis, the primary end point occurred in 32 patients (19.6%) in the intervention group vs 3 patients (1.7%) in the usual care group (absolute difference, 17.9%; 95% CI, 11.5%-24.3%; P < .001). AF lasting 6 hours or longer was detected in 14 patients (8.6%) in the intervention group vs 0 patients in the usual care group (absolute difference, 8.6%; 95% CI, 4.3%-12.9%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In post-cardiac surgical patients at high risk of stroke, no preoperative AF history, and AF lasting less than 24 hours during hospitalization, continuous monitoring revealed a significant increase in the rate of POAF after discharge that would otherwise not be detected by usual care. Studies are needed to examine whether these patients will benefit from oral anticoagulation therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02793895.

Protective Effects of Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate in Stroke Patients Receiving Amiodarone: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Anti-arrhythmic agents, like amiodarone, interfere at different stages of the ischemic stroke. However, amiodarone was accompanied with immunological pulmonary complications and adverse neurological effects. We hypothesize that magnesium sulfate in combination with amiodarone holds promise for stroke treatment. Thirty-six patients with confirmed diagnosis of ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation who received bolus amiodarone were randomly assigned to magnesium sulfate every 24 h or similar volume of normal saline (as placebo) for 5 days. Various severity test scores were used to evaluate the symptoms. Routing biochemistry were also measured at days 1 and 5. Treatment with MgSO4 results in a significant reduction in serum levels of NGAL, Hb, T.Bill, IL-6, IL-8, SNSE, S100B, EGF, PAF, CRP and IgG. Also, MgSO4 treatment significantly improved the RASS, Candida, SOFA, NIHSS and APACHE scores. Moreover, reduction of IL-6, IL-8, SNSE, EGF and APACHE score and increase in RASS score were significantly higher in MgSO4 group compared with placebo. Intravenous administration of MgSO4 in amiodarone-treated stroke patients improved the inflammatory, immunological and neurological indicators and reduced disability in ICU-admitted AIS patients, suggesting that this treatment scheme may prevent amiodarone-induced complications in these patients.

Simple Amiodarone Protocol Reduces Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation

Background

Incorporating amiodarone into an existing postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) prevention pathway may reduce postoperative AF and length of stay (LOS).

Methods

From July 2002 through December 2002, 476 consecutive cardiac surgical patients were managed with an AF prevention protocol using aggressive potassium replacement, intraoperative/ postoperative magnesium supplementation, and postoperative resumption of β-blockers. From January 2003 through June 2003, 592 additional patients were subjected to the same protocol except amiodarone was initiated intraoperatively (150 mg intravenously) and continued postoperatively until discharge (200 mg orally three times daily). Incidence of AF, postoperative LOS, and AF risk factors were collected prospectively and compared using regression models with propensity scores to adjust for dissimilarities between groups.

Results

Incorporating amiodarone into an existing AF protocol resulted in a 45% reduction in postoperative AF (29% [136/476] versus 16% [94/592], P < 0.0001). After adjustment for covariates and propensity score, the relative risk reduction with amiodarone in this protocol remained significant (P = 0.001, RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.5–0.8). Multivariate risks for postoperative AF included no amiodarone (P = 0.0001), age (P < 0.0001), ejection fraction <40% (P = 0.0005), ventilator support >24 hours (P = 0.002), no postoperative β-blocker (P = 0.002), and mitral valve procedure (P = 0.03). When postoperative AF did occur, risk adjusted LOS was less in patients on the amiodarone protocol (mean 9.4 days versus 13.1 days, P = 0.06). Readmission after discharge for any reason (10% [49/476] versus 8% [45/592], P = 0.1) or for AF (1.1% [5/476] versus 0.7% [4/592], P = 0.5) was similar between groups.

Conclusion

Amiodarone initiated intraoperatively followed by oral dosing significantly reduces postoperative AF and tends to reduce LOS if AF occurs.

The more you look, the more you find: atrial fibrillation - nowhere to hide

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We provide an updated review on the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery as determined by enhanced cardiac rhythm monitoring technology and provide a rationale for why a more aggressive detection approach for POAF may be clinically useful.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most of the published literature had focused on the in-hospital incidence of POAF after cardiac surgery. However, recent studies using continuous cardiac rhythm technologies revealed that the incidence of POAF during the postdischarge, subacute (<1 month) phase could be as high as 28%. This is a clinically relevant finding since that POAF is linked with occurrence of future, 'late' atrial fibrillation, and adverse clinical outcomes even beyond 1 year after cardiac surgery. Furthermore, the role of oral anticoagulation is still not well established for cardiac surgical patients with POAF because of lack of randomized trials specifically designed for this patient population.

SUMMARY

Emerging data suggest that POAF after cardiac surgery is not a transient, self-resolving phenomenon. Rather, its occurrence is associated with future risk of atrial fibrillation and long-term adverse outcomes such as stroke and death. This highlights the potential importance of enhanced cardiac rhythm monitoring to refine prognostic stratification in this high-risk patient population.

Fish oil supplementation for primary prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) after cardiac surgery is a common complication that may influence patients' early and long term outcomes and hospital costs. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of fish oil on occurrence of AF following coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).

METHODS

This study was a single-center, randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Four-hundred and one patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery were randomly assigned to receive 2 g/d fish oil or placebo (olive oil) for at least 5 days before surgery. The primary end point was defined as time to AF improvement After AF incidence following isolated CABG or a need for pharmacologic therapy or cardioversion.

RESULTS

The time to AF improvement in intervention group was shorter than control group (HR: 2.05; 95% CI = 0.70-6.22, P = 0.20). The incidence of AF in the intervention and control groups was 8.40% vs. 14.07% respectively (p = 0.07). Mean total duration of AF was 20.96 ± 4.71 h in intervention groups and 46.87 ± 7.44 h in control groups (p = 0.04). Mean duration of stay in the ICU and total hospital stay showed a significant reduction in the intervention group (p = 0.003 and p = 0.04, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The consumption of PUFA leads to a shorter time to AF improvement, which was not statistically significant. The incidence of AF in patients undergoing CABG surgery was decreased by approximately 5.7%; which was statistically on the borderline. Fish oil reduced median length of stay in the ICU and hospital. Further well-designed studies are needed to overcome the limitations of the existing trials and provide conclusive conclusions.

Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia: Choice of Anesthetic Agents and Techniques

Fast-track cardiac anesthesia (FTCA) incorporates early tracheal extubation, decreased length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, and (ideally) should avoid or reduce complications to safely achieve cost-savings. A growing body of evidence from randomized trials has identified many anesthetic interventions that can improve outcome after cardiac surgery. These include new short-acting hypnotic, opioid, and neuromuscular blocking drugs. An effective FTCA program requires the appropriate selection of suitable patients, a lowdose opioid anesthetic technique, early tracheal extubation, a short stay in the ICU, and coordinated perioperative care. It is also dependent on the avoidance of postoperative complications such as excessive bleeding, myocardial ischemia, low cardiac output state, arrhythmias, sepsis, and renal failure. These complications will have a much greater adverse effect on hospital length of stay and healthcare costs. A number of clinical trials have identified interventions that can reduce some of these complications. The adoption of effective treatments into clinical practice should improve the effectiveness of FTCA.

Practical Management Guide for Clinicians Who Treat Patients with Amiodarone

Amiodarone, an iodinated benzofuran derivative with Class I, II, III, and IV antiarrhythmic properties, is the most commonly used antiarrhythmic drug used to treat supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. Appropriate use of this drug, with its severe and potentially life-threatening adverse effects, requires an essential understanding of its risk-benefit properties in order to ensure safety. The objective of this review is to afford clinicians who treat patients receiving amiodarone an appropriate management strategy for its safe use. The authors of this consensus management guide have thoroughly reviewed and evaluated the existing literature on amiodarone and apply this information, along with the collective experience of the authors, in its development. Provided are management guides on the intravenous and oral dosing of amiodarone, appropriate outpatient follow-up of patients taking the drug, its recognized adverse effects, and recommendations on when to consult specialists to help in patient management. All clinicians must be cognizant of the appropriate use, follow-up, and adverse reactions of amiodarone. The responsibility incurred by those treating such patients cannot be overemphasized.

A Novel Amiodarone-Eluting Biological Glue for Reducing Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation

Objective:

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most common complication after cardiac surgery, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of this preliminary study was to evaluate a novel drug delivery system for local release of amiodarone.

Methods:

In the current prospective study, 9 goats underwent attachment of right atrial (RA) epicardial electrodes. Alginate-based glue with amiodarone was applied to the RA of the treatment groups. Rapid atrial response (RAR) to burst pacing was assessed before application and in the third postoperative day (POD3). Average RAR frequency was defined as the average percentage of inductions resulting in RAR per animal. Myocardial and extracardiac tissue amiodarone concentrations were analyzed.

Results:

Differences in RAR proportions between baseline and POD3 were greater in the treatment group versus the control group ( P = .034). Average RAR frequency was reduced by 34% in the treatment group (baseline: 65%; POD3: 31%), while it was increased by 11.3% in the control (baseline:43.8%; POD3: 55%). The treatment group demonstrated a greater proportion of animals meeting the success criterion of net percentage reduction in RAR frequency greater than 25% ( P = .047). The average amount of total amiodarone detected in the RA was 104.4 ± 28.9 µg; the transmural concentration was linearly distributed ( P < .0001). Extracardiac tissue concentrations were below the detection level.

Conclusions:

Local alginate-based amiodarone delivery demonstrated an RAR frequency reduction of clinical importance in response to burst pacing. The electrophysiological response was achieved while maintaining below-detection systemic drug levels. Current findings may point to the system’s future applicability in reducing POAF risk in humans.

Interventions for preventing post-operative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing heart surgery

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation is a common post-operative complication of cardiac surgery and is associated with an increased risk of post-operative stroke, increased length of intensive care unit and hospital stays, healthcare costs and mortality. Numerous trials have evaluated various pharmacological and non-pharmacological prophylactic interventions for their efficacy in preventing post-operative atrial fibrillation. We conducted an update to a 2004 Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to gain a better understanding of the effectiveness of these interventions.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to assess the effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for preventing post-operative atrial fibrillation or supraventricular tachycardia after cardiac surgery. Secondary objectives were to determine the effects on post-operative stroke or cerebrovascular accident, mortality, cardiovascular mortality, length of hospital stay and cost of treatment during the hospital stay.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of ControlLed Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 8, 2011), MEDLINE (from 1946 to July 2011), EMBASE (from 1974 to July 2011) and CINAHL (from 1981 to July 2011).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery who were allocated to pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions for the prevention of post-operative atrial fibrillation or supraventricular tachycardia, except digoxin, potassium (K(+)), or steroids.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently abstracted study data and assessed trial quality.

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred and eighteen studies with 138 treatment groups and 17,364 participants were included in this review. Fifty-seven of these studies were included in the original version of this review while 61 were added, including 27 on interventions that were not considered in the original version. Interventions included amiodarone, beta-blockers, sotalol, magnesium, atrial pacing and posterior pericardiotomy. Each of the studied interventions significantly reduced the rate of post-operative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery compared with a control. Beta-blockers (odds ratio (OR) 0.33; 95% confidence interval) CI 0.26 to 0.43; I(2) = 55%) and sotalol (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.43; I(2) = 3%) appear to have similar efficacy while magnesium's efficacy (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.73; I(2) = 51%) may be slightly less. Amiodarone (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.54; I(2) = 63%), atrial pacing (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.36 to 0.61; I(2) = 50%) and posterior pericardiotomy (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.67; I(2) = 66%) were all found to be effective. Prophylactic intervention decreased the hospital length of stay by approximately two-thirds of a day and decreased the cost of hospital treatment by roughly $1250 US. Intervention was also found to reduce the odds of post-operative stroke, though this reduction did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.01; I(2) = 0%). No significant effect on all-cause or cardiovascular mortality was demonstrated.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Prophylaxis to prevent atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery with any of the studied pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions may be favored because of its reduction in the rate of atrial fibrillation, decrease in the length of stay and cost of hospital treatment and a possible decrease in the rate of stroke. However, this review is limited by the quality of the available data and heterogeneity between the included studies. Selection of appropriate interventions may depend on the individual patient situation and should take into consideration adverse effects and the cost associated with each approach.

Examining the safety of amiodarone

INTRODUCTION

Amiodarone is the most widely used antiarrhythmic agent, with demonstrated effectiveness against all the spectrum of cardiac tachyarrhythmias. The risk of adverse effects acts as a limiting factor to its utilization especially in the long term. This article systematically reviews the published evidence on amiodarone versus placebo to examine its safety as an antiarrhythmic drug.

AREAS COVERED

Authors collected data on adverse effects reported in 49 randomized placebo-controlled trials with amiodarone. Adverse effects were classified according to the organ/system involved. Pooled estimates of the number needed to treat (NNT) and to harm (NNH) versus placebo were calculated.

EXPERT OPINION

Amiodarone is effective for both the acute conversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) (11 trials, NNT = 4 at 24 h; p = 0.003) and the prevention of postoperative AF (18 trials, NNT = 8; p < 0.001), although with an increased risk of bradycardia, hypotension, nausea or phlebitis (pooled NNH = 4; p < 0.001). Amiodarone administration for the maintenance of sinus rhythm has a favorable net clinical benefit (pooled NNT = 3; p < 0.001 versus pooled NNH for either thyroid toxicity, gastrointestinal discomfort, skin toxicity or eye toxicity = 11; p < 0.001). Treatment with amiodarone for the prophylaxis of sudden cardiac death has less favorable net clinical benefit (15 trials, NNT = 38; p < 0.001 versus NNH for either thyroid toxicity, hepatic toxicity, pulmonary toxicity or bradycardia = 14; p < 0.001). Amiodarone treatment in this setting should be used in only selected cases.

Pharmacologic prophylaxis for atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery: a systematic review

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia occurring after cardiac surgery. Its incidence varies depending on type of surgery. Postoperative AF may cause hemodynamic deterioration, predispose to stroke and increase mortality. Effective treatment for prophylaxis of postoperative AF is vital as reduces hospitalization and overall morbidity. Beta-blockers, have been proved to prevent effectively atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery and should be routinely used if there are no contraindications. Sotalol may be more effective than standard b-blockers for the prevention of AF without causing an excess of side effects. Amiodarone is useful when beta-blocker therapy is not possible or as additional prophylaxis in high risk patients. Other agents such as magnesium, calcium channels blocker or non-antiarrhythmic drugs as glycose-insulin--potassium, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, N-acetylcysteine and statins have been studied as alternative treatment for postoperative AF prophylaxis.

Postoperative Care of the Cardiac Surgical Patient

The subspecialty of interventional cardiology began in 1977. Since then, the discipline of interventional cardiology has matured rapidly, particularly with regards to ischemic heart disease. As a result, more patients are undergoing percutaneous catheter interventional therapy for ischemic heart disease and fewer patients are undergoing surgical myocardial revascularization. Those patients referred for surgical revascularization are generally older and have more complex problems. Furthermore, as the population ages more patients are referred to surgery for valvular heart disease. The result of these changes is a population of surgical patients older and sicker than previously treated.

Postoperative atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia that occurs after cardiac surgery. It is associated with an increase in morbidity, length of hospital stay and mortality. Patients who are at higher risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation should receive prophylactic treatment. Atrial fibrillation usually resolves spontaneously after heart rate is controlled; however, if patients are highly symptomatic or hemodynamically unstable, sinus rhythm should be restored by electrical or pharmacologic cardioversion.

Postoperative atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia after cardiac surgery. It is associated with an increase in morbidity, length of hospital stay, and mortality. Patients who are at higher risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation should receive prophylactic treatment. Atrial fibrillation usually resolves spontaneously after heart rate is controlled; however, if patients are highly symptomatic or hemodynamically unstable, sinus rhythm should be restored by electrical or pharmacologic cardioversion. Patients with atrial fibrillation of more than 48 hours should receive antithrombotic therapy for thromboembolism prevention.

The Changing Face of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation Prevention

Atrial fibrillation is the most common postoperative arrhythmia with significant consequences on patient health. Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) complicates up to 8% of all noncardiac surgeries, between 3% and 30% of noncardiac thoracic surgeries, and between 16% and 46% of cardiac surgeries. POAF has been associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and longer, more costly hospital stays. The risk of POAF after cardiac and noncardiac surgery may be affected by several epidemiologic and intraoperative factors, as well as by the presence of preexisting cardiovascular and pulmonary disorders. POAF is typically a transient, reversible phenomenon that may develop in patients who possess an electrophysiologic substrate for the arrhythmia that is present before or as a result of surgery. Numerous studies support the efficacy of beta-blockers in POAF prevention; they are currently the most common medication used in POAF prophylaxis. Perioperative amiodarone, sotalol, nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, and magnesium sulfate have been associated with a reduction in the occurrence of POAF. Biatrial pacing is a nonpharmacologic method that has been associated with a reduced risk of POAF. Additionally, recent studies have demonstrated that hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors may decrease the risk of POAF. Finally, based on recent evidence that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers reduce the risk of permanent atrial fibrillation, these medications may also hold promise in POAF prophylaxis. However, there is a need for further large-scale investigations that incorporate standard methodologies and diagnostic criteria, which have been lacking in past trials.

Practical regimen for amiodarone use in preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Postoperative atrial fibrillation occurs in 5% to 65% of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Although postoperative atrial fibrillation is often regarded as a temporary, benign, operation-related problem, it is associated with a twofold to threefold increase in risk of adverse events, including permanent or transient stroke, acute myocardial infarction, and death.

METHODS

This randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial included 250 eligible consecutively enrolled patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). They received 300 mg of amiodarone/placebo administered intravenously over 20 minutes on the first postoperative day and an oral dose of 600 mg of amiodarone or placebo twice daily for the first 5 postoperative days.

RESULTS

The patients in amiodarone prophylaxis experienced a reduction in risk of atrial fibrillation of 14% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.0% to 24%), with the number needed to treat at 6.9 (95% CI, 4.2 to 20), and the results for symptomatic atrial fibrillation showed a risk reduction of 18% (95% CI, 9.4% to 26), with the number needed to treat at 5.7 (95% CI, 3.9 to 11). Of the patients who developed atrial fibrillation in the placebo group, 84% experienced a symptomatic attack versus only 43% in the amiodarone group.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative prophylaxis with a high dose of oral amiodarone after an intravenous bolus infusion is a safe, practical, feasible, and effective regimen for CABG patients. It significantly diminishes the occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation.

Amiodarone Prophylaxis for Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: Meta-Analysis of Dose Response and Timing of Initiation

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate a possible dose-response relationship between amiodarone and reduction in incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, and to determine whether pre- or postoperative initiation of amiodarone is superior.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

DATA SOURCE

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for English-language reports published between 1966 and December 2005.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 23 identified randomized controlled trials of amiodarone prophylaxis of postoperative atrial fibrillation, 14 were included in the final analysis. These studies enrolled a total of 2864 patients. For each study, the total administered amiodarone dose--categorized as low (< 3000 mg), medium (3000-5000 mg), or high (> 5000 mg)--and preoperative versus postoperative initiation were aggregated by using meta-analytic techniques. The incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was significantly reduced by amiodarone compared with placebo (p<0.001). Although the odds of developing atrial fibrillation appeared to be somewhat higher in the low-dose group, no significant differences were noted in the odds ratios (ORs) of developing atrial fibrillation among the low-, medium-, and high-dose groups: OR 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.77; OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.30-0.69; and OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.33-0.58; respectively (p=0.238). In addition, the ORs for atrial fibrillation development associated with preoperative and postoperative initiation of amiodarone were not significantly different (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.39-0.63; and OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.37-0.63; respectively, p=0.862).

CONCLUSION

Total amiodarone doses of 3000 mg or higher may be more effective than lower doses in reducing the rate of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Preoperative initiation of amiodarone appears to be unnecessary. These findings require confirmation in prospective, randomized trials.

Prophylactic Amiodarone for Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

Amiodarone has been proposed to decrease atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. The literature was systematically reviewed for randomized trials comparing amiodarone with control for prevention of atrial fibrillation. Data were extracted on study characteristics, quality, and incidence of atrial fibrillation, cardiovascular outcomes, and length of hospitalization. Nineteen trials were included. Amiodarone reduced the odds ratio of atrial fibrillation (0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43 to 0.59, p < 0.0001), ventricular tachyarrhythmias (0.39; 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.58, p < 0.0001), and strokes (0.53; 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.92, p = 0.02). Amiodarone reduced hospital stay (0.6 days; 95% CI: 0.4 to 0.8, p < 0.0001). Amiodarone decreased atrial fibrillation, reduced perioperative ventricular tachyarrhythmias and strokes, and reduced duration of hospitalization. The current evidence supports recommending the routine use of perioperative amiodarone for cardiac surgery.

Cost-effectiveness of amiodarone for prophylaxis of atrial fibrillation after cardiothoracic surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether prophylactic amiodarone, dosed according to Atrial Fibrillation Suppression Trial (AFIST) I and II regimens, is a cost-effective strategy for prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation.

DESIGN

Cost-effectiveness analysis of retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Urban, academic hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 2046 patients who underwent cardiothoracic surgery between February 1, 1998, and October 31, 2003. Of these patients, 186 received amiodarone and 1860 served as controls.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Each patient who received prophylactic amiodarone using the AFIST I or II dosing strategies was matched for age, sex, history of valvular surgery, history of atrial fibrillation, beta-blocker intolerance, and receipt of preoperative digoxin therapy with 10 patients who did not receive prophylactic amiodarone. Occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, total hospital costs, and both intensive care unit (ICU) and total hospital length of stay (LOS) were compared between groups. Nonparametric bootstrapping was conducted to examine study results as part of a quadrant analysis and to calculate confidence intervals for the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. The ICU and total hospital LOS, and total costs for patients with and without postoperative atrial fibrillation were also compared. Fewer patients receiving prophylactic amiodarone developed postoperative atrial fibrillation compared with controls (23.1% vs 29.9%, p=0.05). Total hospital costs for the amiodarone group were 28% less than those for the control group (24,131 US dollars +/- 26,539 vs 33,518 US dollars +/- 40,892, p=0.002). Approximately 98% of the time, patients receiving amiodarone prophylaxis fell into the quadrant that showed superior efficacy and lower total costs. Patients who developed postoperative atrial fibrillation, compared with those who did not, regardless of amiodarone prophylaxis, had a longer mean +/- SD stay in the ICU (6.9 +/- 17.1 vs 3.7 +/- 7.9 days, p<0.001), a longer mean total hospital LOS (14.8 +/- 18.8 vs 10.2 +/- 10.4 days, p+/-0.001), and higher mean total hospital costs (41,574 US dollars +/- 54,721 vs 28,968 US dollars +/- 31,046, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic amiodarone was shown to reduce the occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation as well as total hospital costs in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. In patients who developed postoperative atrial fibrillation, both ICU and total hospital LOS as well as total hospital costs were increased.

Risk-Stratified Evaluation of Amiodarone to Prevent Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND

Amiodarone prophylaxis (AMP) reduces the prevalence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery. We investigated the impact of AMP on the frequency and duration of POAF, the intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and its cost-effectiveness in a risk-stratified cohort.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational analysis of 509 patients who underwent cardiac surgery in 2003 was performed. Data sources included The Society of Thoracic Surgeons national database; medical and medication administration records; and the activity-based cost data from our institution. Risk stratification for POAF was determined using a validated risk index. Cost-effectiveness was determined from the hospital's perspective.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 63 years, 27% were female, 80% underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, and 29% underwent valve surgery. When a risk-stratified evaluation was made, 50% of patients were at an elevated risk for having POAF develop. When compared with nonprophylaxed patients, those receiving AMP (59%) experienced less POAF (31% vs 22%; p = 0.027) and shorter durations of POAF (4.7 vs 2.7 days; p = 0.025). In the elevated-risk group, AMP clinically (but not significantly) reduced length of stay in the intensive care unit (101 vs 68 hours; p > 0.05) and post-procedural hospital length of stay (9.7 vs. 7.9 days, p > 0.05). In the elevated-risk group, AMP was robustly cost-effective in reducing POAF.

CONCLUSIONS

Amiodarone prophylaxis reduced the prevalence and duration of POAF. Baseline risk for POAF was a major determinant of the overall cost-effectiveness of AMP. The greatest cost savings with AMP was seen in patients at an elevated risk for POAF. These findings suggest the need for risk stratification when prescribing AMP.

Effect of Low-Dose Amiodarone and Magnesium Combination on Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Surgery

BACKGROUND

To evaluate whether postoperative administration of intravenous low-dose amiodarone and magnesium sulfate (MgSO(4)) combination would reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in normomagnesemic high-risk patients for postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF).

METHODS

A total of 136 patients undergoing elective CABG and had > or =3 risk factors for POAF were prospectively randomized to one of three groups, to receive a single dose of amiodarone (5 mg/kg) and MgSO(4) (1.5 g) (combination group, n = 44), or an equal dose of amiodarone (amiodarone group, n = 44) or equal volumes of saline (control group, n = 48) at early postoperative period. Continuous electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring was performed for the first 48 hours and an ECG was recorded every 8 hours later. POAF longer than 30 minutes or for any length requiring treatment, and the drug-related side effects were recorded.

RESULTS

The study population showed a homogeneous distribution regarding risk factors for POAF and there was no significant difference in patient characteristics, echocardiographic variables, or operative variables among three groups. POAF developed in 4 patients in combination group, in 16 patients in amiodarone group and in 16 patients in control group, representing a 24% relative risk reduction between the combination group and control group (p = 0.023). No statistically significant difference regarding incidence of POAF was observed between amiodarone and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined prophylactic therapy with amiodarone and MgSO(4) at the early postoperative period without a maintenance phase is an effective, simple, well-tolerated, and possibly cost-effective regimen to prevent POAF in normomagnesemic, high-risk patients.

Safety of amiodarone in the prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the safety of amiodarone in the prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A search of the medical literature was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials of prophylactic amiodarone use in cardiothoracic surgery. Studies were independently reviewed by three investigators and selected for inclusion if they met the following three criteria: (1) randomized controlled trial of amiodarone versus placebo or routine treatment, (2) patients underwent coronary artery bypass graft or valvular surgery, and (3) reported data on the frequency of at least one of the following safety endpoints: bradycardia, hypotension, heart block, nausea, cerebral vascular accident, myocardial infarction, and death. Both random- and fixed-effects models were used to determine any significant associations between amiodarone and safety endpoints.

RESULTS

Eighteen trials were analyzed. A total of 3408 patients were enrolled in these trials (1736 received amiodarone and 1672 received placebo). Amiodarone increased the odds of developing bradycardia (odds ratio [OR], 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-2.74) and hypotension (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.04-2.54). The administration of i.v. amiodarone, an average daily dose exceeding 1 g, and postoperative amiodarone administration were each associated with a greater likelihood of hemodynamic adverse effects. Amiodarone did not appear to affect other safety endpoints.

CONCLUSION

Meta-analysis showed amiodarone to be associated with an increased risk of developing bradycardia and hypotension when used for the prophylaxis of postoperative atrial fibrillation. The greatest risk in the occurrence of these adverse events arose when using regimens containing i.v. amiodarone, initiating prophylaxis during the postoperative period, and using regimens with average daily doses exceeding 1 g.

Amiodarone and optic neuropathy: the heart of the matter

Amiodarone is one of the most effective antiarrhythmic drugs currently available. Although a subject of intense controversy, a causal link between amiodarone and optic neuropathy has never been firmly established. Indications for treatment with amiodarone are outlined, and features of the optic neuropathy in patients on amiodarone are compared with those of nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. An approach to patients treated with amiodarone who present with optic neuropathy is outlined, and suggestions for a registry and prospective study of such patients are presented.

Effect of Prophylactic Amiodarone on Clinical and Economic Outcomes After Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND:

Two previous meta-analyses of amiodarone for prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiothoracic surgery did not evaluate total hospital cost, concluded that data on stroke are incomplete, and did not evaluate the effect of clinical heterogeneity between trials.

OBJECTIVE:

To conduct a meta-analysis examining amiodarone's prophylactic impact on cardiothoracic surgery POAF, length of stay (LOS), stroke, and total costs.

METHODS:

Three reviewers conducted a systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library (1966–September 2004%). Studies were included if they met the following criteria: (1%) randomized controlled trial versus placebo/routine treatment, (2%) coronary artery bypass graft and/or valvular surgery, (3%) Jadad score ≥3, (4%) reported data on incidence of POAF or stroke, LOS, or total costs, (5%) used electrocardiographic/Holter monitoring, and (6%) monitored subjects for ≥2 days. A random-effects model was utilized. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted.

RESULTS:

Fifteen trials were identified, including 1512 and 1429 patients in the amiodarone and control groups, respectively. Amiodarone reduced POAF (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.60%) and decreased stroke (n = 8 studies), LOS (n = 10%), and total costs (n = 6%) (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.96; −0.73 days, 95% CI −0.95 to −0.51; and –$1619, 95% CI −3395 to 156, respectively). Surgery type, β-blocker use, route of administration, use of a fixed-effects model, or exclusion of unblinded/unpublished studies did not affect the overall results. No statistical heterogeneity was observed for any endpoint evaluated (p > 0.22 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS:

Prophylactic treatment with amiodarone decreases patients' risk of POAF and stroke while reducing LOS.

Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: an evidence-based approach to prevention

A number of advances in surgical and anesthetic techniques have reduced the risk for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, postoperative atrial fibrillation remains common, with an incidence ranging between 25% and 40%. It is associated with an increased incidence of congestive heart failure, renal insufficiency, and stroke that prolongs hospitalization and increases rates of readmission after discharge. Consequently, there has been great interest in strategies to prevent this arrhythmia. When both safety and efficacy are considered, the available evidence to date suggests that only beta-blockers can be recommended for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Other treatments might be considered on an individual basis after careful consideration of the patient's potential for side effects.

A benefit–risk assessment of class III antiarrhythmic agents

The prevalence of arrhythmia in the population is increasing as more people survive for longer with cardiovascular disease. It was once thought that antiarrhythmic therapy could save life, however, it is now evident that antiarrhythmic therapy should be administrated with the purpose of symptomatic relief. Since many patients experience a decrease in physical performance as well as a diminished quality of life during arrhythmia there is still a need for antiarrhythmic drug therapy. The development of new antiarrhythmic agents has changed the focus from class I to class III agents since it became evident that with class I drug therapy the prevalence of mortality is considerably higher. This review focuses on the benefits and risks of known and newer class III antiarrhythmic agents. The benefits discussed include the ability to maintain sinus rhythm in persistent atrial fibrillation patients, and reducing the need for implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock/antitachycardia therapy, since no class III antiarrhythmic agents have proven survival benefit. The risks discussed mainly focus on pro-arrhythmia as torsade de pointes ventricular tachycardia.

Pharmacologic Strategies for Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation After Open Heart Surgery

Postoperative atrial fibrillation is a common complication after open heart surgery; it increases morbidity, hospital stay, and costs. In an analysis of 8 large cardiac surgery trials totaling 20,193 patients, the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was estimated to be 26% and ranged from 17% to 35%. We reviewed the results of 52 studies published between 1966 and 2003 that evaluated pharmacologic strategies to prevent postoperative atrial fibrillation in nearly 10,000 patients undergoing open heart operations. Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation, after open heart operations occurred in 29% of patients who did not receive prophylactic drugs, compared with 12% in patients who received intravenous followed by oral amiodarone, 15% in those given sotalol, 16% in those given oral amiodarone, and 19% in those given beta-blockers. Pharmacologic strategies and regimens aimed at preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation are necessary to optimize the postoperative care of patients undergoing open heart operations. Although no strategy has consistently been shown to be superior to another, the most effective approach to preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation likely involves multiple interventions. In the absence of contraindications, all patients should receive beta-blocker therapy before and after the operation. For patients with 1 or more risk factors for postoperative atrial fibrillation, regimens consisting of either sotalol (beta-blocker with class III antiarrhythmic properties) alone or beta-blockers in combination with amiodarone seem to be the safest, most effective pharmacologic strategies for preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation.

Selective Use of Amiodarone and Early Cardioversion for Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs in 20%-40% of patients undergoing open-heart surgery. Numerous pharmacological and electrical therapies have been used as a prophylaxis to prevent this dysrhythmia. The purpose of this study was to examine the selective use of amiodarone and early cardioversion (CVN) postoperatively to restore normal sinus rhythm (NSR).

METHODS

A retrospective nonrandomized review of patients who received amiodarone and early electrical CVN (study group) for postoperative AF after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were compared with patients who received nonamiodarone therapies (control group). The study group received 150 mg of amiodarone bolus intravenously and thereafter received an infusion of 1 g over a 24-hour period. If NSR was established within 24 hours, then the intravenous (IV) infusion was continued for another 24 hours with concomitant oral amiodarone overlap. If NSR was not established within 24 hours, then external electrical CVN was performed. After 48 hours, the IV infusion was discontinued and the oral regimen maintained through discharge. Control group patients received either combination digoxin and procainamide or diltiazem. Postoperative beta-blocker administration was instituted in all patients.

RESULTS

Six-hundred forty consecutive CABG patients were examined between July 1995 and June 2003. Postoperative AF developed in 160 of these patients (25%). One-hundred patients constituted the study group and 60 patients represented the control group. Restoration of NSR within 24 and 48 hours occurred in 79 (79%) and 90 patients (90%) for the study group, respectively, compared with 38 (64%) and 44 patients (73%) for the control group, respectively. The presence of NSR at discharge was achieved in 98 study patients (98%) and 50 control patients (83%). The length of stay (LOS) for the study and control patients was 7.4 and 9.1 days, respectively. There was no mortality in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Amiodarone and early CVN was more effective than nonamiodarone therapies with regard to restoring NSR for patients in whom AF developed after elective CABG. A trend toward a decrease in LOS was observed in the study group, but was not statistically significant. The overall LOS using amiodarone therapy with early CVN was similar to postoperative AF for patients in whom the condition did not develop.

Interventions for preventing post-operative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing heart surgery

BACKGROUND

Post-operative atrial fibrillation is a common complication of cardiac surgery and has been associated with increased incidence of other complications including post-operative stroke, increased hospital length of stay and increased cost of hospitalisation. Prevention of atrial fibrillation is a reasonable clinical goal and, consequently, many randomised trials have evaluated the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. We systematically reviewed the literature and prepared meta-analyses to better understand the role and effects of various prophylactic therapies against post-operative atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for preventing post-cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL from earliest achievable date to June 2003. We hand searched references from reports and earlier reviews. We searched abstract books and CD-ROMs from annual scientific meetings of American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology and European Heart Organization between 1997-2003. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing pharmacological interventions or non-pharmacological interventions with control treatment, placebo or usual care for the prevention of post-operative atrial fibrillation in post-coronary artery bypass grafting or combined CABG and valvular surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty eight studies were included with a total of 8565 participants. Interventions included were amiodarone, beta blockers, solatol and pacing. Results favoured treatment for post-operative atrial fibrillation. The data for stroke favoured treatment by a non-significant effect size of 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 1.28. Similarly, a positive indication for length of stay was derived but it too was not significant with a weighted mean difference of -0.66, 95% confidence interval -0.95 to -0.37. A positive result for cost of hospitalisation in favour of treatment was achieved, but the statistic is not significant due to low power and large standard deviations: a weighted mean difference of -2717, 95% confidence interval 7518 to 2084. Beta-blockers had the greatest magnitude of effect across 28 trials (4074 patients) with an odds ratio (random) of 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.26 to 0.49. Across all treatment, the odds ratio favoured treatment with a ratio (random) of 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 0.51.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Intervention is favoured across the three pharmacological interventions studied and the one non-pharmacological intervention, pacing. The length of stay data favoured treatment (-0.66, 95% confidence interval -0.95 to -0.37).