Prognostic factors and survival after complete resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma: experiences in 167 patients

Survival outcomes of lung metastases from colorectal cancer treated with pulmonary metastasectomy or modern systemic chemotherapy: a single institution experience

BACKGROUND

Although pulmonary metastasectomy is an accepted treatment strategy for resectable lung metastases (LM) from colorectal cancer (CRC), its survival benefits are controversial. In contrast, recent advancements in chemotherapy have significantly improved metastatic CRC prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate survival outcome of LM from CRC in the age of newly developed chemotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 50 patients who underwent complete resection and 22 patients who received chemotherapy as definitive treatment for LM from resected CRC at our hospital. The present study was limited to patients who started treatment for isolated LM after molecular targeted drugs became available in Japan.

RESULTS

Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS) rates after pulmonary resection were 64.5%, 66.4%, and 32.6% at five years, respectively. OS and CSS rates of chemotherapy patients were 26.8% and 28.3% at five years, with a median progression-free survival time of 10.0 months. When compared the characteristics of surgical and chemotherapy patients, patients with pN factors of CRC (p = 0.013), smaller size (p < 0.001), larger number (p < 0.001), and bilateral (p < 0.001) LM received chemotherapy. Univariate analysis showed that multiple LM and rectal lesions were poor prognostic factors for OS (p = 0.012) and DFS (p = 0.017) in surgical patients, and rectal lesions were a poor prognostic factor for OS (p = 0.013) in chemotherapy patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary metastasectomy showed a favorable survival in patients with LM from CRC. Despite the high recurrence rate after metastasectomy and recent advances in chemotherapy, surgical resection could still be considered as a valid option among multidisciplinary treatments.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The research plan was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Shinko Hospital (No. 2142) on February 7, 2022.

Clinical score for colorectal cancer patients with lung-limited metastases undergoing surgical resection: Meta-Lung Score

BACKGROUND

Radical resection of isolated lung metastases (LM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) is debated. Like Fong's criteria in liver metastases, our study was meant to assign a clinical prognostic score in patients with LM from CRC, aiming for better surgery selection.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 260 CRC patients who underwent curative LM resection from December 2002 to January 2022, verifying the impact of different clinicopathological features on the overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

At the univariate analysis: higher baseline CEA levels (p = 0.0001), disease-free survival less than or equal to 12 months (m) (p = 0.0043), LM size larger than 2 cm (p = 0.0187), multiple resectable nodules (p = 0.0083), and positive nodal status of the primary tumor (p = 0.0011) were associated with worse prognosis. In a Cox regression model, these characteristics retained their independent role for OS (p < 0.0001) and were chosen as criteria to be assigned one point each for clinical risk score. The 5-year survival rate in patients with 0 points was 88%, while no patients with a 5-point score survived at 2 years. Based on the 0-1 vs. 2-5 score range, we obtained a significant difference in median OS: not reached vs. 40.8 months (95 %CI 36 to 87.5), respectively (p < 0.0001) stratifying patients into good and poor prognosis. The prognostic role of the score was also confirmed in terms of median RFS: not reached in 0-1 scored patients vs. 30.5 months (95 %CI 19.4 to 42) in patients with 2-5 scores (p = 0.0006).

CONCLUSIONS

When LM from CRC is resectable, the Meta-Lung Score provides valuable prognostic information. Indeed, while upfront surgery should be considered in patients with scores of 0 to 1, it should be cautiously suggested in patients with scores of 2 to 5, for whom a prognosis comparison between preventive surgery and other treatments should be investigated in prospective randomized clinical trials.

Applying machine learning techniques to predict the risk of lung metastases from rectal cancer: a real-world retrospective study

Background

Metastasis in the lungs is common in patients with rectal cancer, and it can have severe consequences on their survival and quality of life. Therefore, it is essential to identify patients who may be at risk of developing lung metastasis from rectal cancer.

Methods

In this study, we utilized eight machine-learning methods to create a model for predicting the risk of lung metastasis in patients with rectal cancer. Our cohort consisted of 27,180 rectal cancer patients selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2017 for model development. Additionally, we validated our models using 1118 rectal cancer patients from a Chinese hospital to evaluate model performance and generalizability. We assessed our models' performance using various metrics, including the area under the curve (AUC), the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPR), the Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC), decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curves. Finally, we applied the best model to develop a web-based calculator for predicting the risk of lung metastasis in patients with rectal cancer.

Result

Our study employed tenfold cross-validation to assess the performance of eight machine-learning models for predicting the risk of lung metastasis in patients with rectal cancer. The AUC values ranged from 0.73 to 0.96 in the training set, with the extreme gradient boosting (XGB) model achieving the highest AUC value of 0.96. Moreover, the XGB model obtained the best AUPR and MCC in the training set, reaching 0.98 and 0.88, respectively. We found that the XGB model demonstrated the best predictive power, achieving an AUC of 0.87, an AUPR of 0.60, an accuracy of 0.92, and a sensitivity of 0.93 in the internal test set. Furthermore, the XGB model was evaluated in the external test set and achieved an AUC of 0.91, an AUPR of 0.63, an accuracy of 0.93, a sensitivity of 0.92, and a specificity of 0.93. The XGB model obtained the highest MCC in the internal test set and external validation set, with 0.61 and 0.68, respectively. Based on the DCA and calibration curve analysis, the XGB model had better clinical decision-making ability and predictive power than the other seven models. Lastly, we developed an online web calculator using the XGB model to assist doctors in making informed decisions and to facilitate the model's wider adoption (https://share.streamlit.io/woshiwz/rectal_cancer/main/lung.py).

Conclusion

In this study, we developed an XGB model based on clinicopathological information to predict the risk of lung metastasis in patients with rectal cancer, which may help physicians make clinical decisions.

Kolorektal kanseri olan hastaların ameliyat sonrası klinik yönetiminde fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose pozitron emisyon tomografisi/bilgisayarlı tomografi’nin tanısal önemi

Amaç: Kolorektal kanser, erken tespitinde cerrahi kür sağlanabilen yaygın bir kanser türüdür. Bu kanser tipinde tedaviye yanıtın erken belirlenmesi yaşam süresini olumlu etkilemektedir. Çalışmamızda kolorektal kanseri olan hastaların, ameliyat sonrasındaki klinik yönetimlerinde F-18 FDG PET/BT’nin tanısal önemini değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Haziran 2016 ve Ocak 2020 tarihleri arasında 168 hasta kolorektal kanser yönetimi amacıyla bölümümüze yönlendirilmiştir. Bu hastaların hepsi primer kolon tümörleri için ameliyat edilmişlerdi. Sistemik tedavi öncesinde ve sonrasında tedavi yanıtının değerlendirilmesi amacıyla bazal ve ardışık F-18 FDG PET/BT incelemesi yapılmıştır. F-18 FDG PET/BT taramaları sırasıyla analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular: Hastalar primer tümör lokalizasyonlarına göre gruplandırıldı. Toplam 168 hastanın 55’inde sağ kolonda, 33’ünde sol kolonda, 14’ünde transvers kolonda, 61’inde rektosigmoid kolonda ve 5’inde çekumda primer tümör saptandı. Lokal rekürrens 57 hastada saptanmış olup 33’ü erkek (%57.9) ve 24’ü (%42.1) kadındı. Lokal rekürrense ait ortalama SUVmaks 8.97±3.42 g/ml olarak saptandı. Ek olarak çıkan kolon grubunda 2 hastada (%1.20) yeni tümöral odak gözlendi. Sonuç: Kolorektal kanserli hastalarda, yapılabiliyorsa kolon rezeksiyonu tedavide ilk aşamadır. Küratif cerrahi sonrası ilk iki yıl içinde, hastaların yaklaşık %40’ında rekürrens görülebilmektedir. Rekürrensin erken tespiti, hastaların yaşam süresini iyileştirmektedir.

Management of single pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer: State of the art

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common causes of death from cancer. Lung seeding occurs in approximately 10% of patients surgically treated for primary CRC with radical intent: the lung is the most common site of metastases after the liver. While surgical treatment of liver metastases is widely accepted to affect long-term outcomes, more controversial and not standardized is the therapy for CRC patients developing lung metastases. Experience suggests the potential curative role of pulmonary metastasectomy, especially in oligometastatic disease. However, the optimal strategy of care and the definition of prognostic factors after treatment still need to be defined. This review focused on the uncommon scenario of single pulmonary metastases from CRC. We explored pertinent literature and provide an overview of the epidemiology, clinical characteristics and imaging of single pulmonary metastases from CRC. Additionally, we identified the best available evidence for overall management. In particular, we analyzed the role and results of locoregional approaches (surgery, radiotherapy or ablative procedures) and their integration with systemic therapy.

Role of surgical resection and its alternative local therapy for pulmonary metastasis of colorectal cancer

We reviewed surgical and alternative treatments for pulmonary metastasis of colorectal cancer, focusing on recent reports. The standard treatment for pulmonary metastasis of colorectal cancer is pulmonary resection, if resectable, despite the fact that the metastasis is hematogenous to distant organs. Guidelines in several countries, including Japan, have described pulmonary resection as a useful option because of the favorable long-term prognosis reported in various studies pertaining to pulmonary resection. The indications for pulmonary resection have been reviewed in several studies; additionally, the number of metastases, pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen value, and disease-free interval from the primary resection to pulmonary recurrence have been proposed. However, no consensus has been reached to date. Contrastingly, recent advances in chemotherapy have remarkably improved the outcome of distant metastases, indicating that it is time to reconsider the significance of local treatment, including pulmonary resection. In addition to surgical resection, minimally invasive therapies, such as stereotactic body radiation therapy and radiofrequency ablation have been developed as local treatments for pulmonary metastases, and their long-term results have been reported. Prospective controlled trials and large-scale data analyses are needed to determine the best local treatment for pulmonary metastases and to find the appropriate indication for each treatment.

Pulmonary metastasectomy with lymphadenectomy for colorectal pulmonary metastases: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Routine lymphadenectomy during metastasectomy for pulmonary metastases of colorectal cancer has been recommended by several recent expert consensus meetings. However, evidence supporting lymphadenectomy is limited. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the impact of simultaneous lymph node metastases on patient survival during metastasectomy for colorectal pulmonary metastases (CRPM).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines of studies on lymphadenectomy during pulmonary metastasectomy for CRPM. Articles published between 2000 and 2020 were identified from Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library without language restriction. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability of included studies. Survival rates were assessed and compared for the presence and level of nodal involvement.

RESULTS

Following review of 8054 studies by paper and abstract, 27 studies comprising 3619 patients were included in the analysis. All patients included in these studies underwent lymphadenectomy during pulmonary metastasectomy for CRPM. A total of 690 patients (19.1%) had simultaneous lymph node metastases. Five-year overall survival for patients with and without lymph node metastases was 18.2% and 51.3%, respectively (p < .001). Median survival for patients with lymph node metastases was 27.9 months compared to 58.9 months in patients without lymph node metastases (p < .001). Five-year overall survival for patients with N1 and N2 lymph node metastases was 40.7% and 10.9%, respectively (p = .064).

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous lymph node metastases of CRPM have a detrimental impact on survival and this is most apparent for mediastinal lymph node metastases. Therefore, lymphadenectomy during pulmonary metastasectomy for CRPM can be advised to obtain important prognostic value.

Thoracoscopic pulmonary metastasectomy in metastatic colorectal cancer: Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to confirm the effectiveness of thoracoscopic metastasectomy for colorectal cancer (CRC) and determine its prognostic factors.

METHODS

Of the 181 patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for pulmonary metastases from CRC between 2011 and 2017, 173 were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical outcomes, long-term survival, and the factors affecting the prognosis were analyzed.

RESULTS

The patients in the study were predominantly male (n = 104, 60.1%), and the median age was 65 years (range, 25-83 years). The median follow-up time was 46 months (range, 0-114 months). The surgical procedures were 156 wedge resections, five segmentectomies, and 12 lobectomies. Conversion to thoracotomy was required in nine patients. The postoperative complication rate was 2.9%, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 1.2%. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 94.8%, 70.6%, and 51.8%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that the prognostic factors for survival were age (p = 0.027), pathological stage of CRC (p = 0.019), prior extrathoracic metastasis (p = 0.005), preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level (p = 0.020), number of pulmonary metastases (p = 0.011), and disease-free interval (p = 0.026). In the multivariate analysis, two factors were related to prognosis: age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.881; 95% confidence interval [CI]; 1.189-2.976; p = 0.007) and prior extrathoracic metastasis (HR, 2.170; 95% CI; 1.269-3.711; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

VATS for pulmonary metastasectomy for CRC can be performed relatively safely, and our results regarding long-term survival are comparable with those of other studies. In this study, older age (≥70 years) and prior extrathoracic metastasis were independent prognostic factors of poor prognosis.

Knowing When to Use Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy in Oligometastatic Cancer

Oligometastatic patients are a heterogeneous and yet not well-defined population. The actual definition identifies as oligometastatic, patients with 1-5 metastases in 1-3 different organs. However, only a proportion of these patients are "true" oligometastatic and therefore derive some kinds of benefit from local ablative approaches like stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR). Since SABR is an easily accessible, effective and well-tolerated treatment, it is widely employed in the oligometastatic scenarios, without a particular focus on selection criteria. However, it should be crucial to identify predictive and prognostic features that could be clinically implemented. Therefore, we conducted this narrative review of the available literature to summarize all clinical, radiomic, genetic and epigenetic features found to be predictive of overall survival, progression-free survival or local control of oligometastatic patients treated with SABR.

The impact of primary tumor location on prognosis after colorectal lung metastasectomy

PURPOSE

Currently, right colon cancer (RCC), left colon cancer (LCC), and rectal cancer (REC) are typically seen as different tumor entities. It is unknown if this subdivision by primary tumor location has an influence on the survival of patients with colorectal pulmonary metastasectomy (PM).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed our prospective database of 233 patients operated on for colorectal lung metastases between 1999 and 2014. Differences in the patient characteristics and the primary tumor and metastatic tumor burden were analyzed using χ2-tests. The long-term survival after PM of the three groups was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

In total, PM was performed for 37 patients with RCC, 57 patients with LCC, and 139 patients with REC. Patients with LCC were significantly more likely to have UICC stage IV primary tumor (44.2% LCC vs. 37.5% RCC vs. 22.8% REC, p = 0.012) and significantly more likely to have a history of additional liver metastases (45.6% LCC vs. 32.4% RCC vs. 27.3% REC, p = 0.046). The 5-year survival rates after PM for patients with RCC, LCC, and REC were 47, 66, and 39%, respectively (p = 0.001). The median survival times of patients with RCC, LCC, and REC were 55 months (95% CI: 42.2-66.8), 108 months (95% CI: 52.7-163.3), and 44 months (95% CI: 50.4-63.6), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated a prognostic impact of the primary tumor localization in patients undergoing PM for colorectal lung metastases. Nevertheless, long-term survival was achievable in all groups.

The Assessment of Prognostic Factors for Lung Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer Patients With Previously Resected Liver Metastases

The purpose of this study is to investigate the prognostic factors of lung metastasectomy in patients with previously resected liver metastases. Thirty-three patients underwent complete resection of lung metastases after previous liver metastasectomy from colorectal cancer between January 2004 and December 2013. In univariate analyses, all cumulative survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences in variables were evaluated using the log-rank test. Multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. The 5-year survival rate of all 33 patients after lung metastasectomy was 31%. Univariate analysis identified 2 significant prognostic factors: preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen level (P = 0.035) and maximum tumor size (P = 0.029). Subgroup analysis with a combination of these 2 independent prognostic factors revealed 2-year survival rates of 100%, 92.3%, and 0% for patients with 0, 1, and 2 risk factors, respectively. We identified 2 independent poor prognostic factors for pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with previously resected liver metastases: high serum carcinoembryonic antigen level before lung metastasectomy, and maximum size of lung metastases. When these 2 factors are combined, higher- and lower-risk subgroups can be identified, which may help select patients with previously resected liver metastases who benefit most from lung metastasectomy.

Therapeutic Approaches for Metastases from Colorectal Cancer and Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma

Metastasis is the process of dissemination of a tumor, whereby cells from the primary site dislodge and find their way to other tissues where secondary tumors establish. Metastasis is the primary cause of death related to cancer. This process warrants changes in original tumoral cells and their microenvironment to establish a metastatic niche. Traditionally, cancer therapy has focused on metastasis prevention by systematic treatments or direct surgical re-sectioning. However, metastasis can still occur. More recently, new therapies direct their attention to targeting cancer stem cells. As they propose, these cells could be the orchestrators of the metastatic niche. In this review, we describe conventional and novel developments in cancer therapeutics for liver and lung metastasis. We further discuss the resistance mechanisms of targeted therapy, the advantages, and disadvantages of diverse treatment approaches, and future novel strategies to enhance cancer prognosis.

Prognostic significance of spread through air spaces in pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

Surgical resection for pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer could provide long-term survival in selected patients, and it is commonly performed in practice. However, surgical margin relapse sometimes occurs and is a problematic issue to resolve. Spread through air spaces (STAS) is one of the invasion forms in primary lung cancer and is associated with local recurrence and a poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of STAS for pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer and to assess the predictability of STAS with preoperative clinical information.

METHODS

A total of 96 pulmonary metastatic lesions from colorectal cancer in 37 patients who underwent metastasectomy at our institution from January 2008 to December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

STAS was identified in 41.6 % of the 96 lesions. Surgical margin relapse was found in 8 lesions (8.3 %) from 7 patients (18.9 %). The distance of STAS was identified as an independent risk factor for surgical margin relapse on multivariable analysis (p =  0.033). The patients with STAS showed significantly worse overall survival than those without (5-year overall survival rate: 30.3 % vs. 76.9 %; p =  0.002). On multivariable analysis, patients with STAS had a significantly higher risk of death than those without (p =  0.019). An elevated pre-metastasectomy serum carcinoembryonic antigen level was independently correlated with STAS on multivariable analysis (p =  0.049).

CONCLUSION

STAS was related to a poor prognosis and surgical margin relapse in pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer.

Taiwan Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (TSCRS) Consensus for Cytoreduction Selection in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Taiwan has witnessed a surge in the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC), of which 40-60% metastasize. Continuous updating of cytoreductive strategies in metastatic CRC (mCRC) has contributed to median overall survival reaching 40 months. In this changing scenario, to standardize the approaches across Taiwan, a group of experts from the Taiwan Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (TSCRS) convened to establish evidence- and opinion-based recommendations for defining the criteria of "resectability" in mCRC.

METHODS

Over the course of one-on-one consultations, lasting 30-40 min each, with 30 medical specialists (19 colorectal surgeons, 4 general surgeons, and 7 medical oncologists) from 16 hospitals in Taiwan followed by a 2-h meeting with 8 physician experts (3 general surgeons, 4 colorectal surgeons, and 1 thoracic surgeon), 12 key questions on cytoreduction were addressed. This was further contextualized based on published literature.

RESULTS

The final consensus includes eight recommendations regarding the criteria for metastasis resection, role of local control treatment in liver potentially resectable patients, management of synchronous liver metastases, approach for peritoneal metastasis, place for resection in multiple-organ metastasis, and general criteria for resectability.

CONCLUSIONS

mCRC patients undergoing R0 resection have the greatest survival advantage following surgery. Our role as a multidisciplinary team (MDT) should be to treat potentially resectable mCRC patients as rapidly and safely as possible, and achieve R0 resection as far as possible and for as long as possible (continuum of care). This TSCRS consensus statement aims to help build clinical capacity within the MDTs, while making better use of existing healthcare resources.

Tumor Control and Overall Survival after Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Pulmonary Oligometastases from Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Purpose

In pulmonary oligometastases from colorectal cancer (POM-CRC), the primarily recommended local therapy is metastasectomy. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is another local therapy modality that is considered as an alternative option in patients who cannot undergo surgery. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to demonstrate the effects of SBRT on POM-CRC by integrating the relevant studies.

Materials and Methods

The authors explored MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and SCOPUS, and selected studies including patients treated with SBRT for POM-CRC and availability of local control (LC) or overall survival (OS) rate. In this meta-analysis, the effect of SBRT was presented in the form of the LC and OS rates for 1, 2, 3, and 5 years after SBRT as pooled estimates, and the frequency of pulmonary toxicity of grade 3 or higher after SBRT (PTG3-SBRT).

Results

Fourteen full texts among the searched 4,984 studies were the objects of this meta-analysis. The overall number of POM-CRC patients was 495 as per the integration of 14 studies. The pooled estimate LC rate at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years after SBRT was 81.0%, 71.5%, 56.0%, and 61.8%, and the OS rate was 86.9%, 70.1%, 57.9%, and 43.0%, respectively. The LC and OS rates gradually declined until 3 years after SBRT in a similar pattern. Among the 14 studies, only two studies reported PTG3-SBRT as 2.2% and 10.8%, respectively.

Conclusion

For POM-CRC, SBRT is an ablative therapy with a benefit on LC and OS rates and less adverse effects on the lung.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with lung metastases - prognostic factors and long-term survival using patient self-reported outcome (PRO)

OBJECTIVES

The present study aims to evaluate long-term side-effects and outcomes and confirm prognostic factors after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of pulmonary lesions. This is the first work that combines the investigated data from patient charts and patient-reported outcome (PRO) up to 14 years after therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 219 patients and 316 lung metastases treated between 2004 and 2019. The pulmonary lesions received a median dose and dose per fraction of 35 Gy (range: 14-60.5 Gy) and 8 Gy (range: 3-20 Gy) to the surrounding isodose. During the last 1.5 years of monitoring, we added PRO assessment to our follow-up routine. We sent an invitation to a web-based survey questionnaire to all living patients whose last visit was more than 6 months ago.

RESULTS

Median OS was 27.6 months. Univariate analysis showed a significant influence on OS for KPS ≥90%, small gross tumor volume (GTV) and planning target volume (PTV), the absence of external metastases, ≤3 pulmonary metastases, and controlled primary tumor. The number of pulmonary metastases and age influenced local control (LC) significantly. During follow-up, physicians reported severe side-effects ≥ grade 3 in only 2.9% within the first 6 months and in 2.5% after 1 year. Acute symptomatic pneumonitis grade 2 was observed in 9.7%, as grade 3 in 0.5%. During PRO assessment, 39 patients were contacted, 38 patients participated, 14 participated twice during follow-up. Patients reported 15 cases of severe side effects (grade ≥ 3) according to PROCTCAE classification. Severe dyspnea (n = 6) was reported mostly.

CONCLUSION

We could confirm excellent local control and low toxicity rates. PROs improve and complement follow-up care. They are an essential measure in addition to the physician-reported outcomes. Future research must be conducted regarding the correct interpretation of PRO data.

Incidence of Ipsilateral Side Recurrence After Open or Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Resection of Colorectal Lung Metastases

BACKGROUND

There is still controversy whether full lung palpation is required for patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy. We aimed to compare pulmonary ipsilateral recurrence (IR) after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) or open surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer lung metastases between 2003 and 2012 was performed. IR rate was compared between the 2 groups after adjusting for a propensity score matching based on age, sex, disease-free interval, number of metastases, type of resection, presence of a cardiovascular risk factor, presence of a respiratory risk factor, as well as the interaction between the number of metastases and the disease-free interval. The propensity score was used for matched and weighted comparisons of VATS and open patients.

RESULTS

A total of 211 patients underwent surgery for colorectal cancer lung metastases. Of these, 75 (35.5%) were performed via VATS and 136 (64.5%) via open surgery. Before matching, 118 (55.9%) were male and the median age at the time of metastases diagnosis was 61 (range, 49.8-72.2) years. Median disease free-interval was 20 (19.7 ± 28.3) months; 22 (21.6 ± 28.5) months in VATS and 19 (19.0 ± 28.3) months in open surgery. In total, 19 (25.3%) developed IR in VATS, and 39 (28.7%) in open surgery. Five-year overall survival was 53.1% (61.9% VATS; 49.2% open). In the matched sample, IR was 23.6% in VATS vs 26.2% in open surgery (95% confidence interval for risk reduction with VATS: -22.6% to 17.5%; P = .80).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was observed in IR rates between VATS and open surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer lung metastases.

Lung metastasectomy after colorectal cancer: prognostic impact of resection margin on long term survival, a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary metastasectomy is considered a potentially curative treatment for selected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Several prognostic factors have been analysed, but to date, it is still not well defined which is the optimal resection margin during lung metastasectomy (LM). This study analyses the long-term results and prognostic factors after LM in CRC patients with particular attention to the resection margins. Primary endpoint of this study is to assess the correlation between resection margins and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Observational cohort study on all proven cases of CRC lung metastases (2000-2016) resected with curative intent in a single centre.

RESULTS

The series included 210 consecutive patients (M/F 133/77) with a mean age of 65.4 (± 9.96) years, 75% (159/210) of them with a solitary metastasis. Mean size of metastasis was 2.57 cm (± 1.45). One hundred sixty-eight patients underwent wedge resections (80%) and lymphadenectomy was carried out in 90 cases (42.9%). With a mean follow-up of 56 months (range 5-192), we observed a 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) of 95%, 74% and 54%, respectively. The patients were divided into three groups according to the resection margin distance from the tumour: (a) ≥ 2 cm (145 cases); (b) < 2, ≥ 1 cm (37 cases); and (c) < 1 cm (12 cases). The OS was significantly different between the three groups (p = 0,020); univariate and multivariate analyses showed that a narrow resection margin was an independent prognostic factor of worse survival (p = 0.006 and HR 3.4 p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival of patients after LM is strongly associated with a greater distance between the lesion and the resection margin.

Is Adjuvant Chemotherapy Worthwhile After Radical Resection for Single Lung Metastasis From Colorectal Cancer? A Multicentric Analysis Evaluating the Risk of Recurrence

Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) lung metastases may reduce recurrences and improve survival. The choice of best candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting is controversial, especially when a single lung metastases (SLM) is resected. The aim of this study is to evaluate the risk of recurrence after radical resection for single lung metastasis from CRC.

Patients and methods: Demographic, clinical, and pathological data were retrospectively collected for patients radically operated on for single pulmonary metastasis from CRC in 4 centers. Survival was computed by Kaplan-Meyer methods. Chi-square, log-rank test, and for multivariate analysis, Cox-regression and binary logistic regression were used when indicated.

Results: The sample consisted of 344 patients, mean age 65 yrs. Overall 5 yrs survival was 61.9%. Recurrence occurred in 113 pts (32.8%). At univariate analysis, age > 70 (p = 0.046) and tumor size > 2 cm (p = 0.038) were predictive of the worst survival chance, while synchronous lung metastasis (p = 0.039), previous resection of extrathoracic metastasis (p = 0.017), uptake at FDG-PET scan (p = 0.006) and short (<12 months) disease-free interval (DFI) prior to lung metastasectomy (p = 0.048) were risk factors for recurrence. At multivariate analysis, only high CEA (>4 ng/mL) was associated with worst survival (HR: 4.3, p = 0.014), while prior abdominal surgery (HR: 3, p = 0.033), PET positivity (HR: 2.7, p = 0.041), and DFI > 12 months (HR: 0.14, p < 0.001) confirmed to predict recurrence of disease.

Conclusions: Surgical resection of solitary lung metastases from CRC is associated with prolonged survival. High value of CEA, PET positivity, previous extrathoracic resected metastasis, and short (<12 months) DFI were found to be predictive of death or disease recurrence and might identify in this scenario patients at higher risk which could potential benefit of chemotherapy.

An overview on clinical, pathological and molecular features of lung metastases from colorectal cancer

Introduction: Lung metastases occur in 10-20% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Most of them are treated with palliative intent and have a poor prognosis. Pulmonary metastasectomy may be a curative option for carefully selected patients with 5-year survival rates ranging from 25% to 60%. However, up to 70% of patients develop recurrence after pulmonary metastasectomy. Therefore, the identification of prognostic factors is essential in CRC patients with resectable lung metastases. Areas covered: This review aims at summarizing the actual body of knowledge available on lung metastases from CRC focusing on their clinical, pathological and molecular profile. Moreover, we provide an update on experts' attitudes towards lung metastasectomy, adjuvant or perioperative chemotherapy. Expert opinion: Traditional clinical prognosticators such as the total number of pulmonary metastases, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) serum levels before surgery, and presence of lymph node metastases cannot provide reliable criteria to predict survival after lung metastasectomy. Indeed, research efforts have been directed in recent years toward studying the biological characteristics of lung lesions to better define prognosis and response to treatment, and ultimately shed new light on their proper local and systemic management.

Long-term survival after adrenal metastasectomy from colorectal cancer: a report of two cases

Background

Solitary adrenal metastasis from colorectal cancer is rare. Adrenal metastasis is usually detected with synchronous multiple metastases in other organs and is, therefore, considered to be unsuitable for surgical resection. The long-term outcomes of patients with solitary adrenal metastasectomy from colorectal cancer have been reported; however, the survival advantage has not been established. We herein report two cases of curative adrenal resection in patients with solitary adrenal metastasis from colorectal cancer who achieved long-term survival of > 9 years without recurrence after surgical resection.

Case presentation

The first case involved a 71-year-old man who underwent abdominoperineal rectal resection for rectal cancer. Preoperative CT revealed a mass in the right adrenal, which was growing after surgery. After chemotherapy the adrenal mass decreased in size, and adrenalectomy was performed at 8 months after the first surgery. A pathological examination confirmed metastasis from rectal cancer. The patient received adjuvant chemotherapy and is currently alive without recurrence at 9 years after the adrenalectomy. The second case involved a 53-year-old man who underwent sigmoidectomy for sigmoid colon cancer. Four years later, lobectomy was performed for isolated lung metastasis. Twenty months later, PET-CT revealed solitary metastasis in the left adrenal gland and adrenalectomy was performed. A histopathological examination revealed metastatic adenocarcinoma of sigmoid cancer. Postoperative chemotherapy was administered after adrenalectomy and the patient is currently alive and apparently disease-free at more than 9 years after undergoing adrenal metastasectomy.

Conclusion

Curative resection for solitary adrenal metastasis from colorectal cancer may be beneficial for survival.

Local treatment of liver and lung metastases from colorectal cancer: a multicenter Tunisian study

Aim: Surgical treatment of hepatic or pulmonary metastases is the optimal therapeutic goal in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: Our retrospective study concerned 70 patients treated for CRC, collected from 2003 to 2015, presenting liver metastases (LM) in 61 cases and pulmonary metastases (PM) in nine cases, treated by surgery for their distant disease. We collected and compared their epidemiologic, anatomoclinical parameters and analyzed several prognostic factors. Results: Metastases were multiple (≥ 4) in 9/61 LM and in 5/9 PM. Patients had synchronous metastases in 32 cases (30 LM/2 PM) and metachronous metastases in 33 cases (32 LM and 11 PM). Surgery for LM consisted of metastasectomy (49/61), segmentectomy (5/61) and hepatectomy for the remaining seven patients; ten patients had also subsequent liver radiofrequency. LM were treated by wedge resection in 6/9 and lobectomy in two cases, radiofrequency was performed in five cases. 56/61 (80%) patients received chemotherapy, mostly FOLFOX protocol as the first-line treatment and targeted therapy in 55% of cases. For the overall population, median OS and PFS were, respectively, 44 and 32 months. We did not observe any significant difference in terms of OS (p = 0.659) and PFS (p = 0.318) between resected LM or/and PM. A better survival was found when there was disease-free interval between the occurrence of the primary and the metastases exceeded 18 months and in patients with less than four metastases. Conclusion: Resection of metastatic disease mostly in liver and lungs improves survival of patients with CRC. The patients with longer disease-free interval and less than four metastases had the best outcomes.

Expert consensus on multidisciplinary therapy of colorectal cancer with lung metastases (2019 edition)

The lungs are the second most common site of metastasis for colorectal cancer (CRC) after the liver. Rectal cancer is associated with a higher incidence of lung metastases compared to colon cancer. In China, the proportion of rectal cancer cases is around 50%, much higher than that in Western countries (nearly 30%). However, there is no available consensus or guideline focusing on CRC with lung metastases. We conducted an extensive discussion and reached a consensus of management for lung metastases in CRC based on current research reports and the experts' clinical experiences and knowledge. This consensus provided detailed approaches of diagnosis and differential diagnosis and provided general guidelines for multidisciplinary therapy (MDT) of lung metastases. We also focused on recommendations of MDT management of synchronous lung metastases and initial metachronous lung metastases. This consensus might improve clinical practice of CRC with lung metastases in China and will encourage oncologists to conduct more clinical trials to obtain high-level evidences about managing lung metastases.

Pulmonary metastasectomy of colorectal cancer origin: Evaluating process and outcomes

BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of change in policy of computed tomography (CT) scan of the thorax in staging and follow-up of colorectal cancer (CRC). Another objective was to review the outcomes following pulmonary metastasectomies (Pmets) and to determine the prognostic factors affecting outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis from a prospective cohort database of patients, who underwent Pmet for CRC origin from August 2004 to February 2016. The outcome measures were number of Pmets per year, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and prognostic factors affecting survival.

RESULTS

Of 71 patients, 38% (n = 27) underwent Pmet before 2013 and 62% ( n = 44) had surgery after 2013. The 2-year DFS after Pmet was 49.3% and estimated 5-year OS was 51.4% at a median follow-up of 28 months. There was a significant increase in number of Pmets/year ( P = 0.0015), increased detection of synchronous pulmonary metastasis (PM) ( P = 0.005), increased diagnosis of extra-pulmonary metastases (EPM) ( P = 0.005), and improved OS ( P = 0.026) after introduction of CT scan as staging tool. Site of primary tumor (colon) ( P = 0.045), primary nodal stage ( P = 0.009), and the presence of EPM ( P = 0.01) were independent important prognostic factors affecting survival.

CONCLUSION

The CT scan of thorax as a baseline tool for staging and follow-up in CRC increases referral for pulmonary metastasectomy. Surgery achieves excellent prognosis and long-term survival outcomes in CRC with isolated PM and carefully selected patients with solitary liver metastasis.

[Influence of primary lymph node status of colorectal cancer on the development of pulmonary metastases and thoracic lymph node metastases]

BACKGROUND

The lungs are the second most common organ site for metastases in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Lymph node metastasis of CRC represents a prognostic factor for survival.

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigated the influence of CRC lymph node metastasis on lung metastasis, in particular thoracic lymph node metastasis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 88 patients (n = 56 male) with curative resection of lung metastases of CRC was performed. Primary endpoint: influence of lymph node status of CRC on lung metastases. Secondary endpoints: disease-free survival and overall survival. Statistical evaluation was carried out with SPSS.

RESULTS

In 48 patients a positive lymph node status of CRC and in 9 patients an N+ status of lung metastases were determined. The lymph node status of the CRC significantly affected the incidence of synchronous metastases (p = 0.03), disease-free interval until formation of metachronous lung metastases (p = 0.012) and the overall survival of patients with CRC (p = 0.048). The 5‑year survival rate for CRC patients with lung metastases was 48.7% after pulmonary metastasectomy. Thoracic lymph node involvement also significantly affected survival (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Screening for pulmonary metastases should be included in the staging and follow-up of all patients with CRC, especially in patients with a positive lymph node status of the CRC.

Prognostic factors in stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung metastases

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate prognostic factors in patients with lung metastases who undergo lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 87 patients with 129 lung metastases who underwent SBRT between November 2004 and May 2012 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The patient collective consisted of 54 men (62.1%) and 33 women (37.9%); the median age was 65 years (range 36-88). The Karnofsky performance index was ≥70% (median 90%) for all cases, but one (60%). Adverse effects were categorized using the CTCAE 4.0 classification system. Retrospective analyses regarding patients' characteristics, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and local tumor control rates (LTC) were performed.

RESULTS

On univariate and multivariate analysis OS, DSS, and PFS were significantly (p < 0.05) better for patients with ≤3 lung metastases; no extrathoracic metastases at the time of the SBRT; a gross tumor volume (GTV) <7.7 cm³ and patients that received a staging that included positron emission tomography with fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) imaging. Furthermore, a longer OS was observed if newly diagnosed metastases during follow-up were limited to the lung (median survival: 43.7 months versus 21.7 months; p = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

The number and pattern of metastases, and the size of the target volume are strong predictors for the outcome of patients receiving SBRT of lung tumors. FDG-PET/CT should be part of pretherapeutic staging before SBRT.

Percutaneous computed tomography-guided permanent 125I implantation as therapy for pulmonary metastasis

Purpose

To evaluate intermediate-term outcomes after computed tomography (CT)-guided radioactive ¹²⁵I seed implantation (CTRISI), and to determine prognostic variables associated with outcomes in patients with pulmonary metastases.

Material and methods

Thoracic surgeons evaluated and performed implantation of ¹²⁵I radioactive seeds under CT guidance or combined with surgical resection. Patients were monitored in the thoracic surgery clinic for recurrence and survival.

Results

Fifty patients (31 men, 19 women; median age, 59 years; range, 16-85) underwent CTRISI. The primary cancer was colorectal in 10 (20%), malignant fibrous histiocytoma in 8 (16%), sarcoma in 5 (10%), renal in 4 (8%), and other in 22 (44%) patients. CTRISI was the sole treatment in 45 patients (90%) and was combined with surgical resection in 5 patients (10%). The actuarial D₉₀ of implanted ¹²⁵I seeds ranged from 90 to 160 Gy (median, 120 Gy). No procedurally related deaths occurred. At a median follow-up of 41.5 months (range, 7-74 months), 6 patients were alive. The median survival time was 42.1 months (95% confidence interval: 26.5-53.4), and the estimated 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 88.0%, 58.0%, and 26.7%, respectively. Lesion size was an important prognostic variable associated with overall and progression-free survival (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

CTRISI is safe in this group of patients with pulmonary metastases and provides reasonable results. Surgical resection remains the standard for resectable cases, but CTRISI offers an alternative for selected patients or may be used as a feasible approach in combination with surgical resection for selected patients.

The clinical value of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) in patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer

Background

Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) are a potential surrogate for distant metastasis and are considered a useful clinical prognostic marker for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This prospective study evaluated the preoperative CTC count as a prognostic factor for pulmonary metastasectomy in mCRC patients.

Methods

Seventy-nine mCRC patients who underwent curative-intent pulmonary metastasectomy were included. Preoperatively, 7.5 mL of peripheral blood from each patient was quantitatively evaluated for CTCs with the CellSearch^® system. The clinical significance of CTC count was evaluated according to Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank test. Multivariate analyses of the perioperative variables were performed.

Results

The distribution of CTC counts were as follows; 0 in 66 patients (83.5%), 1 in eight patients (10.1%), 2 in three patients (3.8%), and 3 and 6 in one patient (1.3%). The patients with multiple CTCs (CTC count ≥2) had significant shorter disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.005, median DFS; 19.8 vs. 8.6 months) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.035, median DFS; not reached vs. 37.8 months), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed the patients with multiple CTCs had elevated risk of recurrence [hazard ratio (HR), 3.28; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.24-8.67; P=0.017].

Conclusions

The detected rate of CTCs was quite low in mCRC patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy. The patient with multiple CTCs had shorter DFS in this study. The larger prospective clinical study is needed to establish the meaning of CTC in mCRC candidate for pulmonary metastasectomy.

Complete biochemical response after pulmonary metastasectomy in prostate adenocarcinoma

Background

Prostate cancer most commonly metastasizes to bones or lymph nodes, and metastatic prostate cancer is suggestive of disseminated disease. Metastatic disease is usually not amenable to surgery.

Case presentation

The current report presents a unique case of in which the excision of a solitary pulmonary metastasis resulted in undetectable prostate-specific antigen.

Conclusion

This case and others suggest metastasectomy could be considered in cases with solitary metastasis, and physicians should have a careful discussion regarding risks and possible benefits from surgical excision.

Surgical management of lung metastases

Management of pulmonary metastases has evolved considerably over the last few decades but is still controversial. The surgical management of lung metastases is outlined, discussing the preoperative management, indications for surgery, the surgical approach and outcomes according to the primary histology.

Prognosis of video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with colorectal cancer lung metastases: an analysis of 154 cases

PURPOSE

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is widely used in thoracic surgery and increasingly applied to pulmonary metastasectomy. The purpose of this study was to identify prognostic factors of patients undergoing VATS pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

Between January 2005 and June 2015, a total of 154 patients underwent VATS pulmonary metastasectomy from CRC. Patient demographic data and characteristics of the primary tumor and pulmonary metastasis were analyzed to identify factors significantly correlated with prognosis.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period after pulmonary resection was 37 months. The cumulative 5-year overall survival rate after VATS pulmonary metastasectomy from CRC was 71.3%. History of metastasis to other sites (p = 0.035), status of mediastinal lymph nodes (p < 0.001), and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (p = 0.013) were identified as independent prognostic factors. Subgroup analysis with a combination of these three independent prognostic factors revealed 5-year OS rates of 91.0, 70.0, 30.3, and 0.0% for patients with zero, one, two, and three risk factors, respectively. Other factors, such as sex, disease-free interval, T stage of primary tumor, and status of lymph node near the primary tumor, were not significantly associated with prognosis.

CONCLUSION

VATS pulmonary metastasectomy is efficacious for patients with CRC pulmonary metastases. History of metastasis to other sites, status of mediastinal lymph nodes, and preoperative CEA level were identified as independent prognostic factors. The number of risk factors significantly influenced patient survival.

C-reactive protein (CRP) as a prognostic factor for colorectal cancer after surgical resection of pulmonary metastases

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary metastases occur in up to 25% of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Many studies have reported that pulmonary metastasectomy might increase 5-year survival of these patients. The aim of this study was to describe our experience with pulmonary metastasectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer and to explore the prognostic value of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and other factors.

METHODS

Between June 2002 and December 2013, the clinicopathological data of 88 patients who underwent resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Clinical, investigative and operative data were prospectively collected. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from resection of pulmonary metastases to death.

RESULTS

There were 58 men and 30 women in this study, and their median age was 55 (range 31 to 85). Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was performed in 59 cases (78%) and 29 patients (19%) underwent thoracotomy. Lung wedge resection and pulmonary lobectomy were performed in 52 (59.1%) and 36 patients (40.9%), respectively. Preoperative elevated CRP was present in 8 (9.1%) patients. After a median follow-up duration of 44 months, the cumulative 5-year survival was 45.4% and the median overall survival (OS) was 57.8 months. A significantly longer survival was observed in patients with normal preoperative CRP level compared with those with CRP level exceeding 10mg/L (62.6 months vs. 34.3 months, P=0.011). In multivariate analysis, preoperative CRP level was found to be independent significant prognostic factors for survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary resection of metastatic colorectal cancer might offer a chance to prolong survival including those patients with extrapulmonary metastasis. Preoperative serum CRP level was identified as prognosis-related factor for surgery.

Prognostic value of p53 for colorectal cancer after surgical resection of pulmonary metastases

Background

Pulmonary metastases occur in up to 25% of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Many studies have reported that pulmonary metastasectomy might increase 5-year survival of these patients. The aim of this study was to describe our experience with pulmonary metastasectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer and to explore the prognostic value of p53 overexpression and other factors.

Methods

Between July 2002 and December 2013, the clinicopathological data of 88 patients with colorectal carcinoma who underwent pulmonary metastases resection were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Clinical, biochemical and imaging, and operative data, and expression of p53 were retrospectively collected. Immunohistochemical staining for p53 was performed on paraffin-embedded 5-μm sections using mouse anti-human tumor protein p53 monoclonal antibody (DO-7, Dako, Denmark). Overall survival (OS) was calculated from resection of pulmonary metastases to death. The prognostic effect of each variable on survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. For the multivariate analysis of prognostic factors, the Cox regression model was used.

Results

There were 58 men and 30 women in this study, and their median age was 55 (range 31 to 85). Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was performed in 59 cases (78%), and 29 patients (19%) underwent thoracotomy. Lung wedge resection and pulmonary lobectomy were performed in 52 (59.1%) and 36 (40.9%) patients, respectively. After a median follow-up duration of 44 months, the cumulative 5-year survival was 45.4%, and the median overall survival was 57.8 months. The expression of p53 significantly influenced survival. In patients with p53 protein overexpression, we observed a median OS of 46.1 months, whereas the median OS of patients with negative protein expression of p53 was 62.6 months (p = 0.047). However, in multivariate analysis, p53 overexpression was failed to be an independently significant prognostic factor for survival.

Conclusions

Pulmonary resection of metastatic colorectal cancer might offer a chance to prolong survival including those patients with extrapulmonary metastases. p53 protein expression was identified as a prognosis-related factor for surgery.

[Liver and lung metastases of colorectal cancer. Long-term survival and prognostic factors]

INTRODUCTION

The resection of liver and lung metastases from colorectal cancer has not yet been completely investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate the overall survival and prognostic factors for patients with liver and lung metastases from colorectal cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospective database of 52 patients with liver and lung metastases from colorectal cancer, undergoing metastasectomy with curative intent from 1999-2009 at a single institution was carried out.

RESULTS

The mean overall survival (OS) was 64 months. For synchronous liver and lung metastases the mean overall survival was 63 months (5-year survival 54 %) and for metachronous liver and lung metastases 74 months (5-year survival 58 %, p = 0.451). A poor prognostic outcome was observed in cases of localization of the primary tumor in the rectum (OS 81 vs. 38 months, p = 0.004), with multiple lung metastases (≥ 2 metastases, OS 74 vs. 59 months, p = 0.032) and with disease progression after premetastasectomy chemotherapy (OS 74 vs. 63 vs. 15 months, p < 0.001). No influence on overall survival was detected for bilateral lung metastases, thoracic lymph node metastases, disease recurrence and disease-free interval < 36 months.

CONCLUSION

Metastasectomy for liver and lung metastases of colorectal cancer is associated with a good overall survival in selected cases. Patients with liver and lung metastases should not be routinely excluded from metastasectomy and patients with thoracic lymph node metastases should also not be routinely excluded. Negative prognostic factors for survival are localization of the tumor in the rectum, multiple metastases and disease progression after premetastasectomy chemotherapy. Patients with disease progression after premetastasectomy chemotherapy should be excluded from metastasectomy.

A Comparison of Survival by Site of Metastatic Resection in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Metastatic resection (MR) of liver-limited disease is an effective therapy for selected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Despite limited data, this approach has been expanded to include MR of other sites, such as the lung, locoregional, and other distant disease (ODD). We performed a population-based study of patients with mCRC who had undergone MR and compared survival between MR of the liver and MR of other sites.

METHODS

Patients with mCRC who were referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency between 1995 and 2010 were reviewed. Patients were included if they had an R0 MR with a negative margin and no residual disease. The site of MR was classified according to collaborative staging criteria as liver, lung, locoregional, or ODD. Median overall survival (mOS) was assessed with Kaplan-Meier methods and compared using the log-rank test. A Cox proportional-hazards model was used to compare mOS, while adjusting for known prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 2082 patients with mCRC were identified, of whom 257 underwent R0 MR. Sites of MR included liver (65%), lung (16%), locoregional (5%), and ODD (14%). The mOS of liver, lung, locoregional, and ODD were 48.0, 42.8, 37.2, and 26.2 months, respectively (P = .087). On multivariate analysis, only MR of ODD had a significantly different survival estimate than MR of the liver (hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-2.80; P = .012).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with limited lung and locoregional disease seem to have a comparable survival advantage from MR as patients with liver-limited metastases.

Lymphadenectomy During Pulmonary Metastasectomy

Pulmonary metastasectomy continues to be an effective approach to prolong survival in appropriately selected patients. The incidence of lymphatic spread is more common than previously recognized, with an estimate of 20% to 25% across multiple tumor types. The presence of metastatically involved lymph nodes adversely affects survival. What remains unclear is whether N1 vs N2, or the number of stations involved affects survival differently. The role of surgery for pulmonary metastasectomy in the patient with nodal metastases will likely expand with ongoing improvements in targeted and immunotherapies.

[Surgery for pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer: Predictive factors for survival]

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer is the 3rd commonest cause of death from cancer: 5% of patients will develop lung metastases. The management of oligometastatic disease is based on the objective of optimal local control.

STATE OF THE ART

To date, no results from randomized control trials support the resection of pulmonary metastases in oligometastastic colorectal cancer patients. However, numerous series, mainly retrospective, report long-term survival for highly selected patients, with 5-year survival ranging from 45 to 65% in the most recent series. The consensual predictive factors of a good prognosis are: a disease free-interval>36 months, a number of metastases≤3, a normal level of carcino-embryonic antigen and the absence of hilar or mediastinal lymph node involvement.

PERSPECTIVES

Around 20 to 40% of patients will develop recurrence, probably linked to the presence of undetectable micrometastases. Therefore, experimental work is being undertaken to develop new treatment techniques such as isolated lung perfusion, radiofrequency ablation and stereotactic radiation therapy.

CONCLUSION

Highly selected patients suffering from colorectal cancer lung metastases could benefit from resection with improved survival and disease-control.

Repeat pulmonary resection for recurrent lung metastases from colorectal cancer: an analysis of prognostic factors

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic factors for repeat lung metastasectomy in patients with colorectal cancer, which may be clinically helpful in defining a subset of patients who are most likely to benefit from repeat lung metastasectomy.

METHODS

In total, 138 patients underwent complete lung resection for the first time due to metastases of colorectal cancer between January 2004 and December 2013 at Fujita Health University School of Medicine. Among them, 33 underwent repeat pulmonary metastasectomy for lung tumour recurrence. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests were used to analyse the survival rates.

RESULTS

No patient died as a direct result of surgery, and all patients were discharged after the repeat pulmonary metastasectomy. The 5-year survival rate after the initial pulmonary resection of the 33 patients who underwent repeat lung resection was 64%, which was not significantly different from that of the 105 patients who did not undergo repeat lung resection (5-year survival rate, 61%; P = 0.779). Univariate analysis identified only one significant prognostic factor: preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (P = 0.002). The 5-year survival rates of patients with high preoperative CEA levels and normal CEA levels after repeat metastasectomy were significantly different at 47 and 90%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Prethoracotomy serum CEA levels affect survival rates after repeat pulmonary resection. The preoperative assessment of serum CEA levels before repeat metastasectomy is important when considering repeat pulmonary resection, and prethoracotomy CEA levels should be taken into account when selecting patients for repeat lung resection.

Clinical efficacy of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for lung metastases arising from colorectal cancer

Background

Limited data describe the prognosis after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for lung metastases arising from colorectal cancer. Thus, we evaluated treatment outcomes of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for those patients.

Methods

The study involved patients received stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for one to three lung metastases arising from colorectal cancer at a single institution. A total dose of 40–60 Gy (median, 48 Gy) in three or four fractions was prescribed.

Results

A total of 79 metastatic lung lesions from 50 patients who underwent curative resection for their primary colorectal cancer or salvage treatment at a recurrent site were included. The one- and three-year local control rates were 88.7 % and 70.6 %, respectively. The three-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 64.0 % and 24.0 %, respectively. Patients with tumor volume ≤1.5 mL had a significantly better overall survival rate than those with tumor volume >1.5 mL (68.0 % vs. 60.0 % at three-year, p = 0.02). Local control was associated with a trend towards better survival (p = 0.06). No pulmonary complications greater than grade 2 were observed.

Conclusion

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy is a competitive treatment modality for the management of lung metastases arising from colorectal cancer.