Synchronous brain metastasis from lung cancer

Special treatment issues in non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

This guideline updates the second edition and addresses patients with particular forms of non-small cell lung cancer that require special considerations, including Pancoast tumors, T4 N0,1 M0 tumors, additional nodules in the same lobe (T3), ipsilateral different lobe (T4) or contralateral lung (M1a), synchronous and metachronous second primary lung cancers, solitary brain and adrenal metastases, and chest wall involvement.

METHODS

The nature of these special clinical cases is such that in most cases, meta-analyses or large prospective studies of patients are not available. To ensure that these guidelines were supported by the most current data available, publications appropriate to the topics covered in this article were obtained by performing a literature search of the MEDLINE computerized database. Where possible, we also reference other consensus opinion statements. Recommendations were developed by the writing committee, graded by a standardized method, and reviewed by all members of the Lung Cancer Guidelines panel prior to approval by the Thoracic Oncology NetWork, Guidelines Oversight Committee, and the Board of Regents of the American College of Chest Physicians.

RESULTS

In patients with a Pancoast tumor, a multimodality approach appears to be optimal, involving chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection, provided that appropriate staging has been carried out. Carefully selected patients with central T4 tumors that do not have mediastinal node involvement are uncommon, but surgical resection appears to be beneficial as part of their treatment rather than definitive chemoradiotherapy alone. Patients with lung cancer and an additional malignant nodule are difficult to categorize, and the current stage classification rules are ambiguous. Such patients should be evaluated by an experienced multidisciplinary team to determine whether the additional lesion represents a second primary lung cancer or an additional tumor nodule corresponding to the dominant cancer. Highly selected patients with a solitary focus of metastatic disease in the brain or adrenal gland appear to benefit from resection or stereotactic radiosurgery. This is particularly true in patients with a long disease-free interval. Finally, in patients with chest wall involvement, provided that the tumor can be completely resected and N2 nodal disease is absent, primary surgical resection should be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Carefully selected patients with more uncommon presentations of lung cancer may benefit from an aggressive surgical approach.

The elderly with synchronous non-small cell lung cancer and solitary brain metastasis: does palliative thoracic radiotherapy have a useful role?

We evaluated the prognosis associated with advanced age by comparing the clinical features of individuals 65 years of age and older to those of younger patients with single metastasis to the brain alone (SMBA) and simultaneous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the potential role of palliative thoracic radiotherapy in this cohort of patients. Our 23-year experience included 72 consecutive (22 elderly and 50 non-elderly) people. Older patients predominantly presented with N0-N1 stage disease and coexisting illness. Univariate analysis showed that younger age (p=0.04) and operative removal of SMBA (p=0.01) were predictive of better survival. However, with multivariate analysis, resection of SMBA remained the sole predictor of prognosis. The application of NSCLC radiotherapy for palliation did not favorably alter outcome. In conclusion, elderly patients with simultaneous NSCLC and SMBA seem to fare less well than their younger counterparts. Moreover, the concurrent application of radiotherapy for palliation of the lung neoplasm was not prognostically advantageous.

Skin metastases as first manifestation of lung cancer

Skin metastases as manifestation of internal neoplasias constitute a 0.8% of their initial presentation and generally imply an advanced stage of the disease and a short survival. The lung cancer metastasises to the skin in 2.8-24% of the cases, generally in advanced stages of the disease, although in 7-19%, skin metastases appear as first manifestation thereof. Sometimes, the study of the extent in the patients reveals that there are no metastases at other levels. We hereby present the case of a male diagnosed with a lung cancer whose first manifestation was the appearance of skin metastases.

Cutaneous metastases of lung cancer

It is uncommon for a cancer to be diagnosed because of skin metastases. Cutaneous metastases as initial manifestation of internal neoplasias, represent only 0.8% of total cases and implies, in general, a very advanced grade of the disease and short survival. When skin metastases of an unknown primary site appear, lung cancer is the first option to be discarded in case of men, and breast cancer in case of women. Lung cancer spreads to the skin in 2.8-8.7% of the cases, in advanced phases of the disease, although just in 7-23.8% of the cases, cutaneous metastases appear as first manifestation of the primary tumor. Sometimes, a complete examination to discover the tumor reveals no metastases elsewhere.

Treatment options for brain metastases in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

Brain metastases are a common complication for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. In the past, treatment of brain metastases and lung cancer focused on symptom palliation with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and steroids because of the grim outlook for patients. However, recent advances in technology and surgical techniques have created more options for the management of brain metastases, which include surgery, irradiation, stereotactic radiosurgery, and chemotherapy. These aggressive approaches have resulted in an improvement of neurologic outcomes and survival rates of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Central nervous system (CNS) metastases can be divided into three groups: solitary CNS metastases with controlled or controllable primary disease, oligometastatic disease (fewer than 3 metastases), and multiple metastases. For patients with solitary CNS metastases, long-term survival is possible. A radical treatment approach involving surgical resection or radiosurgery, followed by WBRT, is recommended. For patients with oligometastatic disease, surgical resection or radiosurgery is considered in selected cases and WBRT is indicated. For patients with multiple metastases, WBRT is recommended. For patients with oligometastatic disease and those with multiple metastases, recent evidence indicates that systemically effective chemotherapy may produce responses and can be instituted safely before radiotherapy. The treatment timing of chemotherapy and radiotherapy should be individualized.

Treatment options for brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Brain metastases are a common complication for patients with non-small cell lung cancer and a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. In the past, treatment of brain metastases and lung cancer focused on symptom palliation with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and steroids because of the grim outlook for patients. However, recent advances in technology and surgical techniques have created more options for the management of brain metastases, which include surgery, irradiation, stereotactic radiosurgery, and chemotherapy. These aggressive approaches have resulted in an improvement of neurologic outcomes and survival rates of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Central nervous system (CNS) metastases can be divided into three groups: solitary CNS metastases with controlled or controllable primary disease, oligometastatic disease (fewer than three metastases), and multiple metastases. For patients with solitary CNS metastases, long-term survival is possible. A radical treatment approach involving surgical resection or radiosurgery, followed by WBRT, is recommended. For patients with oligometastatic disease, surgical resection or radiosurgery is considered in selected cases and WBRT is indicated. For patients with multiple metastases, WBRT is recommended. For patients with oligometastatic disease and patients with multiple metastases, recent evidence indicates that systemically effective chemotherapy may produce responses and can be instituted safely before radiotherapy. The treatment timing of chemotherapy and radiotherapy should be individualized.

Results of recent therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with brain metastasis as the initial relapse

The results of radiosurgery for treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with brain metastasis as the initial relapse were evaluated. Twenty-three patients were included in the study. The dominant pathologic type was adenocarcinoma (56.5%). In the mean interval of 13.7 months (range, 3-52 months) between the lung operation and treatment of brain metastasis, a solitary lesion developed in 9 patients and multiple lesions developed in 14 patients. The modalities used for brain metastasis were gamma-knife radiation therapy (GKS) in nine patients, GKS plus operation in six, GKS plus whole brain radiation therapy (WBR) in two, operation plus WBR in two, operation only in one, WBR only in two, and no treatment in one. The 1- and 3-year survival rates after treatment of brain were 47.3% and 7.4%, respectively. The prognostic impact of stage and number of brain metastases was not clear. Primary tumor size and adjuvant chemotherapy after the lung operation significantly affected survival after the management of brain metastasis. The low invasive radiosurgery is beneficial in terms of improving the quality of life of patients.

Risk factors affecting survival after brain metastases from non-small cell lung carcinoma: a follow-up study of 70 patients

OBJECT

The authors present their experience with the treatment of brain metastases from non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted in which records from 74 patients treated at the authors' institution between 1994 and 1999 were assessed. Survival and functional outcome were reviewed relative to individual patient variables. The median survival time was 12.9 months, with 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival milestones reached by 52.2%, 30.7%. and 18.1% of patients, respectively. Patients were stratified into groups composed of those with synchronous brain metastases (tumors diagnosed within 3 months of NSCLC) and metachronous brain metastases (tumors diagnosed 3 months after NSCLC). The median survival time and 5-year survival rate were 18 months and 28.9% for metachronous, compared with 9.9 months and 0% for synchronous brain metastases. In univariate analyses, the stage of brain metastases, an initial Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score of 90 or less, and conservative therapy for NSCLC were associated with worse outcomes (p < 0.05). In analyses in which tumors were stratified by synchronous compared with metachronous brain metastases, a preoperative KPS score of 90 or less and radiation therapy (RT) alone for brain metastases were associated with worse outcomes in patients with metachronous brain metastases but not with synchronous tumors (p < 0.05). When stratified by preoperative KPS score, the synchronous brain metastases stage or treatment of brain metastases with RT alone were associated with worse outcome in patients with KPS scores of 100, but had no discernible effect on patients with KPS scores of 90 or less (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The tumor stage and preoperative KPS score were significantly associated with survival. Craniotomy plus RT significantly improved the prognosis in patients with metachronous brain metastases or those with a preoperative KPS score of 100.

Treatment outcome for patients with primary nonsmall-cell lung cancer and synchronous brain metastasis

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of treatment for patients with newly diagnosed nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with an isolated, single, synchronous brain metastasis. A retrospective review was performed evaluating any patient diagnosed between 1982 and 1996 at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation with NSCLC metastatic only to the brain. Patients with multiple brain metastases or with systemic metastases to any other organ were excluded. Survival was measured from the date of the first treatment for malignancy. All hospital records were thoroughly reviewed in a retrospective manner. Thirty-three patients were identified who met the study criteria. Twelve patients had primary disease limited to the lung and hilar nodes, and 21 had more advanced primary disease with involvement of the mediastinum. Treatment of the chest was considered aggressive in 13 patients and palliative in 15. The primary tumor was observed in 5 patients. The management of the brain metastasis was as follows: 21 patients underwent surgical resection and postoperative whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), 5 underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and WBRT, 3 had resection alone, 2 had SRS alone, and 2 underwent WBRT alone. The median overall and disease-free survival for all patients was 6.9 months and 3.3 months, respectively. Overall survival was markedly improved with the addition of WBRT (P = 0.002) and with the aggressive management of the primary tumor (P = 0.005). A total of 9 patients experienced CNS failure, including both patients receiving WBRT alone. CNS failures were divided as follows: 3 local, 5 distant, and 1 local and distant. Two of the 4 patients with a local failure were salvaged, and ultimate local control of the original brain metastasis was achieved in 93.6% of cases. Survival remains poor for patients with Stage IV NSCLC even when metastatic disease is limited to a single site within the brain; however, aggressive therapy of both the lung primary and the brain metastasis may provide a survival advantage. Excellent local control of single brain metastases was achieved with a combination of WBRT with either surgical resection or SRS.

Prognostic factors in surgical treatment of solitary brain metastasis after resection of non-small-cell lung cancer

Patients with brain metastasis after resection of non-small-cell lung cancer usually have poor prognosis. A few such patients, however, survive for long periods after surgical resection of brain metastases. To evaluate the prognostic factors in resection of solitary brain metastasis from non-small-cell lung cancer, we reviewed 24 cases undergoing resection of solitary brain metastasis after resection of the primary site from 1977 to 1993. The patient population consisted of 20 men and four women ranging in age from 40 to 75 years old (average, 57.8 years old). None of the patients had systemic metastasis except in the brain at the time of brain surgery. The overall survival rates were 12.5% at 3 years and 8.3% at 5 years after brain surgery. The longest survival periods were 11.5 years after brain surgery and 15.4 years after lung surgery. The interval between lung and brain surgery (< or =360 days vs. >360 days), differentiation of primary cancer (poor vs. moderate), size of primary site (< or =5.0 cm vs. >5.0 cm), and operation of primary site (lobectomy vs. pneumonectomy) significantly affected survival as shown by univariate analysis (P<0.05). Other clinical factors (age, gender, histology, T- and N-status, 'resectability with curative intent' of the primary site, location of the brain metastasis and postoperative radiation therapy) did not affect survival. Multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazards model indicated that an interval of more than 360 days between the two surgical procedures (hazard ratio = 0.2351, P = 0.0136) and lobectomy (hazard ratio = 0.5274, P = 0.0416) were independent prognostic factors. In conclusion, patients with solitary brain metastasis from non-small-cell lung cancer without other organ metastasis, in whom relapse in the brain occurred more than 1 year after resection of the primary site and in whom lobectomy was performed, should be treated surgically to maximize the chance of prolonged survival.

Is it time to reevaluate our approach to the treatment of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer?

Brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer develop in approximately one-third of patients. If not treated, neurological deterioration occurs quickly. Treatment with whole brain irradiation is advisable to palliate symptoms but despite this treatment, survival remains poor at 3-6 months. Recently, aggressive approaches with surgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery have dramatically improved the control of brain metastases resulting in a meaningful survival advantage for a subset of eligible patients. New evidence also suggests a possible role for chemotherapy in the treatment of brain metastases. With several options now available to treat brain metastases proper patient selection is needed. This article will stratify patients with brain metastases and discuss the treatment modalities for each category.

Cost-effectiveness of head CT in patients with lung cancer without clinical evidence of metastases

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of CT for detecting brain lesions in patients with lung cancer without clinical evidence of metastases.

DESIGN

Decision analysis model comparing two different strategies for detecting brain metastases: brain CT routinely (CT-first) or brain CT only when patients develop neurologic signs and/or symptoms (CT-deferred).

PATIENTS

Hypothetical cohort of patients with lung cancer with an unremarkable screening clinical evaluation for metastases.

MEASUREMENTS

Net costs are calculated as the difference in costs between the two limbs of the decision tree. Net benefits are expressed as the difference in calculated years of life expectancy between the two strategies. Net costs are divided by net benefits, yielding the marginal cost per quality adjusted year of added life expectancy (C/QALY) for the CT-first strategy.

RESULTS

In the baseline analysis, the C/QALY for the CT-first strategy is about $70,000. Improving the clinical evaluation as a screen for detecting brain metastases markedly increases the C/QALY. Increasing the cost of brain CT magnifies this effect. More effective treatment for asymptomatic brain metastases and better accuracy of CT for identifying resectable and unresectable brain metastases lower C/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a threshold cost-effectiveness has not been defined for identifying "cost-effective" diagnostic procedures, the marginal C/QALY of the CT-first strategy is substantially higher than many accepted medical interventions. At current costs, the routine use of brain CT is not warranted in patients with lung cancer who have normal findings on a standardized clinical evaluation for metastases.

Surgical treatment of brain metastases of lung cancer: retrospective analysis of 89 cases

The records of 89 patients who underwent surgery for solitary or multiple parenchymal brain metastases of lung cancer at the Osaka Center for Adult Diseases between 1978 and 1990 were reviewed with follow up until March 1992. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to identify prognostic features that were associated with a favourable outcome. The benefits of brain tumour surgery were evaluated in terms of the cause of death (brain metastasis, tumour in another organ, or treatment related) as well as the postoperative changes in functional state indicated by the Karnofsky scale. The overall mean survival time was 11.6 months, and the one and two year survival rates were 24% and 8%. The brain lesion itself was the cause of death in only 19% of the patients; the other 81% died of systemic disease. Functional state improved after surgical excision of the brain tumour in 36%, remained unchanged in 53%, and worsened in 11%. These data suggest that surgical intervention is beneficial for patients with parenchymal brain metastases. Variables significantly associated with a favourable prognosis included surgical excision of the primary lesion, adenocarcinoma as the histological diagnosis, the use of adjuvant treatment, especially chemotherapy, a preoperative score of over 80% on the Karnofsky scale, and metastasis confined to the brain with no extracranial metastatic foci or residual primary tumour. Additional but non-significant contributors to a good prognosis included age under 65 or 70 years, early tumour stage (stage 1), curative lung cancer surgery, a single metastatic brain tumour (v multiple lesions), a solid tumour (v cystic), and a supratentorial location of the brain metastasis. The disease free interval and the cerebrospinal fluid cytology were not significant prognostic factors. On the basis of these findings, it is concluded that the surgical removal of brain metastases of lung cancer should be undertaken if the primary tumour has already been removed whether or not there are extracranial metastases, and that postoperative chemotherapy should generally be given.

Cerebral imaging in the asymptomatic preoperative bronchogenic carcinoma patient: is it worthwhile?

The issue of screening for cerebral metastatic disease in the preoperative bronchogenic carcinoma patient remains unsettled and changes with advancing technology. A prospective nonrandomized study was designed to compare contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with computed tomography (CT) after several clinical situations suggested improved sensitivity for the former study. Patients with clinically operable disease and normal neurologic examinations were referred for both enhanced cerebral CT and MRI studies. Forty-two patients were entered and completed the enhanced CT scan; only 30 tolerated the MRI. The demographic data and histology of the patients appeared fairly typical for a series of operative candidates. No unsuspected metastatic lesion was found in this selected and low-risk group. We conclude that neither MRI nor enhanced CT scan is indicated in the asymptomatic bronchogenic carcinoma patient due to expense and lack of positive findings. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated more subtle benign pathology, but this study did not allow comparison of the two techniques in detection of metastatic disease.

Craniotomy and thoracotomy for non-small cell carcinoma of the lung with cerebral metastasis

Twenty patients with non-small cell carcinoma of the lung who had cerebral metastasis, were treated by craniotomy and thoracotomy. Eighteen of these patients had a solitary metastasis and all were treated as curable. Ten patients presented with synchronous lung and brain disease. Of the remaining 10, nine initially presented with the lung tumour, which was treated first. There was a zero operative mortality rate and median survival was 12 months with reasonable quality of life for this time.

Surgical treatment for higher stage non-small cell lung cancer

Locally advanced lung cancer (stage IIIa, IIIb) in which the primary tumor is proximal (T3) or has invaded adjacent structures (T3) or organs (T4) or in which mediastinal lymph nodes are involved (N2, N3) worsens the prognosis significantly. However, in stage IIIa (T3 or N2), when surgical treatment results in total removal of the primary tumor and involved lymph nodes, there still is a reasonable chance for ultimate cure. On the other hand, total excision can be very rarely performed in T4 or N3 tumors. Therefore, this group (stage IIIb) usually indicates unresectability. Disseminated lung cancer with distant metastasis (stage IV) is still considered to be incurable. Nevertheless, solitary metastatic sites (M1), especially brain, have been treated on occasion by resection of the primary tumor and removal of the solitary metastasis. This appears to improve median survival and does yield 5-year survival in selected patients. The results after surgical treatment in these patients with higher stage lung cancer reported over the last 10 years are reviewed.

Resection for solitary brain metastasis. Role of adjuvant radiation and prognostic variables in 229 patients

The authors reviewed 229 consecutive patients treated intramurally by resection of solitary cerebral metastasis. Patients were classified into four groups on the basis of whether a gross total resection or subtotal resection was performed and whether systemic disease was present or absent at the time of craniotomy. Group 1 had gross total resection and no systemic disease; Group 2 had subtotal resection and no systemic disease; Group 3 had subtotal resection and systemic disease; and Group 4 had gross total resection and systemic disease. All four groups were further subdivided into Subgroup A (adjuvant whole-brain radiation therapy) or Subgroup B (no adjuvant radiation). Data were collected regarding multiple patient and tumor variables for multivariate analysis. Survival data for the 46 patients in Group 1A (median 1.3 years, 2-year survival rate 41%, 5-year survival rate 21%) were markedly better than those for the 75 in Group 1B (median 0.7 year, 2-year survival rate 19%, 5-year survival rate 4%). The 20 patients in Group 2A also had superior survival data (median 1.1 years, 2-year survival rate 30%, 3-year survival rate 30%) when compared with the eight patients in Group 2B (median 3 months, 1-year survival rate 0%). However, the 16 and 22 patients in Groups 3A and 4A, respectively, had no discernible differences compared to the seven and 35 patients in their Group 3B and 4B counterparts. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess the association of survival with multiple patient, disease, and treatment variables. Poor neurological status and systemic disease were significantly associated with inferior survival, while longer (greater than 36 months) intervals between primary diagnosis and craniotomy were significantly associated with improved survival. After adjusting for the effects of other patient, disease, and treatment characteristics, adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy was significantly associated with improved survival times. These data support the continued use of craniotomy followed by adjuvant whole-brain radiation therapy for treatment of solitary brain metastasis. However, this aggressive therapy appears relatively contraindicated in the face of either systemic disease or substantial neurological deficit.

Results and prognostic factors of surgery in the management of non-small cell lung cancer with solitary brain metastasis

Between 1975 and 1988, 37 patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and synchronous (within 1 month, n = 10) or metachronous (n = 27) solitary brain metastasis (SBM) underwent combined excision of their lesions. Overall 5-year and median survival were 30% and 27 months (range, 3 to 125+ months), respectively. Twenty-seven patients had a relapse, and their median disease-free interval (DFI) was 17.5 months (range, 1 to 108 months). The most frequent (78%, n = 20) site of first recurrence locally was either the ipsilateral thorax (n = 14) or brain (n = 6). In univariate analysis, age, primary tumor and lymph node status; tumor histology, size, and side; type of pulmonary resection; side and location of SBM; and onset of presentation did not affect survival and DFI. By contrast, the interval (less than or equal to versus greater than 12 months) between the two operations significantly affected survival (P = 0.0096) and DFI (P = 0.046). The DFI was also affected by the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for the primary tumor (P = 0.02). Using the Cox model, AC was the most independent predictor of DFI. These data support the inclusion of surgery in the therapeutic armamentarium for patients with NSCLC and SBM.

Lung cancer with skin metastasis

Cutaneous metastasis from lung cancer is rare, but physicians should understand its significance. We treated eight such patients during a 30-month period at Wilkes-Barre (Pa) General Hospital. The seven men and one woman ranged in age from 46 to 72 years (mean, 59 years). In three, the skin lesion was the first manifestation of the underlying cancer and in another three, it was found coincident with the lung mass. Pathologic findings included small-cell undifferentiated carcinoma in four patients, squamous cell carcinoma in three patients, and large-cell undifferentiated carcinoma in one patient. Seven of the eight primary lung lesions were in the upper lobes. Six patients had clinically occult visceral metastases at the time of skin biopsy. Only one patient survived more than six months following skin metastasis. Biopsy specimens must be taken from all new skin lesions, particularly in patients who smoke or who already have a history of lung cancer.