Long-term follow-up of aprotinin-specific immunoglobulin G antibodies after cardiac operations

Perioperative anaphylaxis to fibrin sealants in children with Noonan Syndrome: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

In the diagnosis of perioperative anaphylaxis, it is essential to define its cause to prevent future reexposures, especially in children with Noonan Syndrome who are characterized by a large number of systemic features and wide-ranging dysmorphia. From an oral surgeon's point of view, apart from an increased risk of tumor incidence, diverse hematologic anomalies are of high concern.

OBJECTIVE

Perioperative management of such patients often requires the use of fibrin sealants, which contain aprotinin. A certain number of anaphylaxis cases have been observed in our daily practice during such treatment, which was the reason for this evaluation.

METHODS

The study was conducted to retrospectively review perioperative anaphylaxis grade II and above in children with Noonan Syndrome who underwent surgeries in the Department of Oral Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, between 2006 and 2021.

RESULTS

Out of the 16 cases of suspected anaphylaxis to aprotinin, 14 were observed in children with Noonan Syndrome. The postoperative serologic screening revealed positive results for qualitative aprotinin-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) G, highly elevated quantitative aprotinin-specific IgG, and slightly elevated aprotinin-specific IgE antibodies. Interestingly, previous aprotinin administration or contact in the past 12 months was excluded.

CONCLUSION

Given that fibrin sealants are typically used in various surgical practices and although the anaphylaxis reactions in such cases are rare, it is essential to be cautious in patients with RASopathies who are at a high risk of developing anaphylaxis.

Aprotinin and anaphylaxis: analysis of 12,403 exposures to aprotinin in cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Hypersensitivity reactions to the nonspecific proteinase inhibitor aprotinin may occur. The present study evaluates the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions to aprotinin.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected as part of the institution's quality assurance program. The database was screened for anaphylactic reactions, especially those against aprotinin. The definition of an allergic reaction was predefined. A severe reaction was defined as hemodynamic instability of more than 10 minutes despite high dosages of vasopressors and inotropic medication.

RESULTS

Of 13,315 cardiac operations, 12,403 were done with aprotinin, with 801 reexposures in 697 patients. Eleven reactions to aprotinin (11 of 11,602; 0.09%, 95% confidence interval: 0.05% to 0.16%) were recorded after primary exposure, of which none was severe, while 12 reactions (12 of 801; 1.5%; 95% confidence interval: 0.86% to 2.6%) occurred after reexposure, of which 5 were severe. All severe reactions were in patients reexposed to aprotinin within 6 months after previous exposure. There was no reaction observed in patients reexposed to aprotinin within 3 days after the last exposure (n = 42). The incidence of hypersensitivity reactions was 4.1%, 1.9%, and 0.4% in the less than 6 months, 6 to 12 months, and more than 12 months reexposure intervals, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of hypersensitivity reactions is low after primary exposure to aprotinin. This risk after reexposure reaches a maximum between the fourth day and the 30th day after previous exposure and declines considerably after 6 months. Consequently, application of aprotinin carries a high risk between the fourth and the 30th day after previous exposure, and cannot be recommended for the first 6 months, but is justifiable in previously aprotinin-exposed patients with a high risk of bleeding after this interval.

Forty Years of Clinical Aprotinin Use: A Review of 124 Hypersensitivity Reactions

Since its clinical introduction, the anaphylactic potential of aprotinin has been a major concern. World wide, its use is expanding so there is an increased chance that patients have reexposure from various sources. The risk of anaphylaxis is approximately 2.8% in reexposed patients. From 1963 to 2003, 124 cases of aprotinin-induced anaphylaxis were reported in 61 publications. Eleven patients died. The reexposure interval was less than 3 months in 72% (38 of 53 patients). This review looks at the profile of patients at risk so preventive measures may be taken. Past and future exposures have to be taken into account before any aprotinin administration.

What price support? Ventricular assist device induced systemic response

Use of ventricular support systems has been associated with myriad systemic complications. Engendered by the blood-biomaterial interface of a unique host/device relationship, these complications include diverse humoral dyscrasias that frequently culminate in episodes of bleeding, hemolysis and thrombogenicity, heightened susceptibility to inflammation and infection, and transient immunal compromise. Recent endeavor in biocompatibility research has served to illustrate the critical role played by cellular, humoral, and neurohormonal components in regulating cytokine expression and has provided insight into the complexities involved in such biomechanical juxtapositions. The following is intended as a review of current literature attempting to address the many aspects of this host/device interaction and their consequences for the supported patient.

Protease inhibitors in the treatment of hereditary angioedema

Deficiency of C1 Inhibitor leads to unopposed activation of complement, with localized, unpredictable, and sometimes life-threatening attacks of angioedema. Treatment with plasma-derived C1 Inhibitor rapidly aborts attacks, and may be lifesaving, but is expensive, requires use of a pooled blood product, may need to be repeated and may not be effective in autoantibody mediated angioedema. The antifibrinolytic agents aprotinin, tranexamic acid, and epsilon-aminocaproic acid are useful for prophylaxis and treatment of angioedema, likely by inhibiting plasmin. Specific drugs to replace the deficient C1 Inh have not been reported. The kallikrein inhibitor DX-88 (Dyax) has received orphan drug status in Europe and is undergoing clinical trial in Europe and the USA.

Comparison of the effects of a cell saver and low-dose aprotinin on blood loss and homologous blood usage in patients undergoing valve surgery

OBJECTIVE

To compare 2 important techniques of blood conservation, use of a cell saver and low-dose aprotinin, in terms of blood loss and homologous blood usage in patients undergoing cardiac valve surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized.

SETTING

Tertiary care hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty adult patients undergoing elective valve surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients were divided into 3 groups of 20 each. In group 1, aprotinin in the dose of 30,000 KIU/kg was added to the pump prime, with a further dose of 15,000 KIU/kg added at the end of each hour of cardiopulmonary bypass. In group 2, a cell-saver system was used to collect all blood at the operation site for processing in preparation for subsequent reinfusion. Group 3 patients acted as a control group and underwent routine management, which included collection of autologous blood during the pre-cardiopulmonary bypass period. A hemoglobin of <8 g/dL was considered as an indication for bank blood transfusion in the postoperative period.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The chest tube drainage was significantly less in group 1 compared with groups 2 and 3, with total drainage (median [interquartile range]) amounting to 250 mL [105 to 325 mL] vs. 700 mL [525 to 910 mL] in group 2 and 800 mL [650 to 880 mL] in group 3 (p < 0.001). The patients in groups 1 and 2 required significantly less bank blood (median [interquartile range]) as compared with group 3 (350 mL [0 to 525 mL], 350 mL [0 to 350 mL], and 1050 mL [875 to 1050 mL]; p < 0.001), respectively. Cell saver provided 410 +/- 130 mL of hemoconcentrated blood in group 2. The average preoperative hemoglobin concentration was 11.3 g/dL, and it was around 9 g/dL on the 7th postoperative day. The hemoglobin concentration at various stages during hospitalization in all 3 groups was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose aprotinin and a cell saver are effective and comparable methods of blood conservation. Aprotinin helps by decreasing the postoperative drainage, and a cell saver helps by making the patient's own blood available for transfusion.

[Allergic risk of aprotinin]

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the risk of anaphylactic reaction with the administration of aprotinin, either by i.v. route or as a biological sealant application and to propose updated guidelines in accordance with current data of the literature.

DATA SOURCES

Search in the Medline data base of articles in French, English and German, published since 1960, using following key words: aprotinin, allergy, anaphylaxis.

STUDY SELECTION

All categories of articles on this topic have been selected.

DATA EXTRACTION

Articles have been analysed for history, incidence and mechanisms of anaphylactic reactions, symptomatology, factors of risk, diagnosis and precautions of use.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Aprotinin is widely used for decreasing preoperative bleeding, especially in cardiac and orthopaedic surgery. This heterologue protein can cause anaphylactic reactions in 0.5 to 5.8% of patients, depending of the inclusion criteria. They are mediated by IgG and IgE antibodies. Aprotinin has also a direct, non specific, histaminoliberation effect. The clinical presentation includes various degrees of severity, up to cardiac arrest. Documented factors of risk are a previous parotinin administration, 15 days to 6 months before, and intolerance to beef meat, white of egg, cheese and milk. The immediate biological diagnosis is obtained on assessing the degranulation of basophiles (histamine) and mastocytes (tryptase), as well as the concentration of anti-aprotinin antibodies (RAST IgE), with a test of inhibition. The secondary assessment, six weeks later, includes prick-tests and intradermoreactions if the former are negative. The mean precaution consists to search factors of risk at preanaesthetic assessment. The predictive value of systematic prick-tests has not yet been validated. Anti H1 and anti H2 premedication is inefficient. A test dose can trigger a severe reaction.

CONCLUSION

Considering a significant anaphylactic risk, aprotinin administration becomes only licit after a careful evaluation of the benefit-risk ratio.

Aprotinin in fibrin tissue adhesives induces specific antibody response and increases antibody response of high-dose intravenous application

BACKGROUND

In cardiac operations, aprotinin therapy is used either locally as a component of commercially available fibrin tissue adhesives, intravenously, or combined. Our aim was to examine the formation of aprotinin-specific antibodies with regard to the application mode.

METHODS

Sera of 150 patients who had undergone cardiac operations and were receiving aprotinin therapy for the first time were sampled before the operation and at medians of 3.5 and 13.3 months after the operation. Aprotinin-specific IgG including all subgroups and aprotinin-specific IgE were analyzed. Aprotinin was given locally (as contained in fibrin sealant; n = 45; median dose, 6000 KIU), intravenously (n = 46; 2.000 x 10(6) KIU), and combined (n = 59; 2.012 x 10(6) KIU).

RESULTS

At 3.5 months, the prevalence of aprotinin-specific IgG antibodies was 33% (15/45 patients) after local, 28% (13/46 patients) after intravenous, and 69% (41/59 patients) after combined exposure (P =.0001). At 13.3 months, the prevalence of aprotinin-specific IgG antibodies was 10% (4/41 patients) after local, 31% (13/42 patients) after intravenous, and 49% (28/57 patients) after combined exposure. Total aprotinin dose was similar in patients who were antibody positive and negative. Before the operation, no aprotinin-specific antibodies were detected. Aprotinin-specific IgE were not found after the operation.

CONCLUSION

Local aprotinin contact induces a specific immune response and reinforces that of intravenous exposure. The antibody spectrum is identical to the immune response induced by intravenous exposure. Any exposure should be documented. For use in cardiac operations as a hemostyptic, the necessity itself and alternatives for aprotinin as a stabilizing agent merit consideration.

Incidence of hypersensitivity reactions

BACKGROUND

Aprotinin is a naturally occurring serine protease inhibitor derived from bovine lung. In common with all foreign proteins, it possesses antigenic properties and has the possibility of allergic reactions on reexposure.

METHODS

Data are presented on the incidence of adverse reactions to aprotinin and the time course of antibody development after initial exposure. Recommendations for reducing the risk and sequelae of these adverse reactions are emphasized and case reports are reviewed.

RESULTS

The incidence rates of aprotinin-related reactions to date (May 1997) at the German Heart Center are 2.7% in the adult population in reexposures (5/183) and 1.2% in the pediatric population (3/254), with an overall incidence of 1.8% (8/437).

CONCLUSIONS

With the recommended precautions, reexposure to aprotinin in patients with a high risk of bleeding is justified, and the benefits of aprotinin treatment outweigh the relative risk of a serious allergic reaction.