Retrograde Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Using the Ureteral Cutting Balloon Catheter

Multidetector computed tomography angiography of the renal arteries: normal anatomy and its variations

Conventional angiography is still considered the gold standard for the study of the anatomy and of vascular diseases of the abdomen. However, the advent of multidetector computed tomography and techniques of digital image reconstruction has provided an alternative means of performing angiography, without the risks inherent to invasive angiographic examinations. Therefore, within the field of radiology, there is an ever-increasing demand for deeper knowledge of the anatomy of the regional vasculature and its variations. Variations in the renal vascular system are relatively prevalent in the venous and arterial vessels. For various conditions in which surgical planning is crucial to the success of the procedure, knowledge of this topic is important. The aim of this study was to familiarize the general radiologist with variations in the renal vascular system. To that end, we prepared a pictorial essay comprising multidetector computed tomography images obtained in a series of cases. We show patterns representative of the most common anatomical variations in the arterial blood supply to the kidneys, calling attention to the nomenclature, as well as to the clinical and surgical implications of such variations.

Mini incision open pyeloplasty - Improvement in patient outcome

PURPOSE

To assess the subjective and objective outcomes of mini-incision dismembered Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in the treatment of primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2008 to January 2013, Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty was performed in 71 patients diagnosed with primary UPJO. Small subcostal muscle splitting incision was used in all cases. Sixteen patients with renal calculi underwent concomitant pyelolithotomy. Subjective outcome was assessed using visual pain analogue score (VAS). For objective assessment, the improvement in differential renal function (DRF) and radio-tracer wash out time (T1/2) on Tc-99m DTPA scan and decrease in hydronephrosis (HDN) on renal ultrasound (USG) and urography (IVU) were assessed.

RESULTS

Mean incision length was 5.2 cm. The average operating time and postoperative hospital stay was 63 (52-124) minutes and 2.5 (2-6) days respectively. Concomitant renal calculi were successfully removed in all the patients. Overall complication rates were 8.4% and overall success rate was 98.6% at median follow-up of 16 months. There was significant improvement in pain score (p=0.0001) and significant decrease in HDN after the procedure. While preoperative mean T1/2 was 26.7±6.4 minutes, postoperative half-time decreased to 7.8±4.2 minutes at 6 months and to 6.7±3.3 minutes at 1 year. Mean pre-operative DRF was 26.45% and it was 31.38% and 33.19% at 6 months and 1 year respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Mini-incision pyeloplasty is a safe and effective technique with combined advantage of high success rates of standard open pyeloplasty with decreased morbidity of laparoscopic approach. Excellent functional and objective outcomes can be achieved without extra technical difficulty.

Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: comparison of two surgical approaches- a single centre experience of three years

UPJO causes hydronephrosis and progressive renal impairment may ensue if left uncorrected. Open pyeloplasty remains the standard against which new technique must be compared. We analyzed the comparison of Laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in a randomized prospective trial. A prospective randomized study was done from January 2004 to January 2007 in which a total of 28 Laparoscopic and 34 open pyeloplasty were done. All laparoscopic pyeloplasties were performed transperitoneally. Standard open Anderson Hynes pyeloplasty, spiral flap or VY plasty was done depending on anatomic consideration. Patients were followed with DTPA scan at 3 months and IVP at 6 months. Perioperative parameters including operative time, analgesic use, hospital stay, and complication and success rates were compared. Mean total operative time with stent placement in LP group was 244.2 min (188-300 min) compared to 122 min (100-140 min) in open group. Compared to open pyeloplasty the post operative diclofenac requirement was significantly less in LP group (mean107.14 mg) and open group required mean of (682.35 mg) The duration of analgesic requirement was also significantly less in LP group. The post operative hospital stay in LP was mean 8.29 days (7-11) and was significantly less than open group (mean 3.14 Days (2-7 days). Open pyeloplasty has been the gold standard for UPJO repair and achieves success rates exceeding 90%. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty provides a minimally invasive alternative to repair UPJO and has developed world wide as the first minimally option to match success rate of open pyeloplasty. Its potential advantages including less post op pain, shorter hospital stay an improved cosmesis has been proved in some comparative series. The only disadvantage seems to be longer operative time. LP has a minimal level of morbidity and short hospital stay compared to open approach Although Laparoscopic pyeloplasty has the disadvantages of longer operative time and requires significant skill of intracorporeal knotting but it is here to stay and represents an emerging standard of care.

Accessory or additional renal arteries show no relevant effects on the width of the upper urinary tract: a 64-slice multidetector CT study in 1072 patients with 2132 kidneys

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to find out on an unselected patient group whether crossing vessels have an influence on the width of the renal pelvis and what independent predictors of these target variables exist.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 1072 patients with arterially contrasted CT scans were included. The 2132 kidneys were supplied by 2736 arteries.

RESULTS

On the right side, there were 293 additional and accessory arteries in 286 patients, and on the left side there were 304 in 271 patients. 154 renal pelves were more than 15 mm wide. The greatest independent factor for hydronephrosis on one side was hydronephrosis on the contralateral side (p<0.0001 each). Independent predictors for the width of the renal pelvis on the right side were the width of the renal pelvis on the left, female gender, increasing age and height; for the left side, predictors were the width of the renal pelvis on the right, concrements, parapelvic cysts and great rotation of the upper pole of the kidney to dorsal. Crossing vessels had no influence on the development of hydronephrosis. Only anterior crossing vessels on the right side are associated with widening of the renal pelvis by 1 mm, without making it possible to identify the vessel as an independent factor in multivariate regression models.

CONCLUSION

The width of the renal pelvis on the contralateral side is the strongest independent predictor for hydronephrosis and the width of the renal pelvis. There is no link between crossing vessels and the width of the renal pelvis.

The use of the acucise technique for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A trade-off between efficacy and invasiveness?

Open pyeloplasty is traditionally the recommended treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. In the past decades, several less invasive procedures emerged with the advantages of lower morbidity and better patient tolerance. In 1993, an electrosurgical cutting balloon device called the Acucise (Applied Medical Resources Corp., Laguna Hills, CA) was introduced. It was presented as a straightforward, safe procedure that can be performed in a complete retrograde fashion under fluoroscopic guidance. Despite these advantages; however, it is not yet a generally excepted procedure. This is mainly due to the fact that specific patient selection is needed, and success rates are comparable with other already established endoscopic procedures. Considering the large variety of minimally invasive procedures available, treatment of choice must be based on several factors such as success rate, morbidity, cost, and surgeon's experience. Acucise is considered a good alternative for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in selected patients. However, the efficacy is significantly lower than the reference standard.

Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Compared with Open Pyeloplasty in Children

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Open dismembered pyeloplasty by a retroperitoneal approach remains the reference standard for correcting ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction in children. We prospectively compared the results of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in children with UPJ obstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During the period April 2003 to March 2005, 15 children underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty and 14 children underwent open pyeloplasty. The two groups were similar in age and mean weight. We prospectively analyzed and compared operative time, postoperative pain and activity, complications, and hospital stay in the two groups. The mean follow-up was 23 and 24 months in the laparoscopy and open surgery group, respectively.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the open surgery group (159 +/- 21.39 [SD] v 214 +/- 32.26 minutes; P = 5.874 x 10(-6)). Postoperative discomfort/pain on day 7 was significantly less in the laparoscopic group, and the mean hospital stay was significantly shorter (P = 0.018019).

CONCLUSIONS

The benefits of laparoscopic pyeloplasty include a high reproducible success rate comparable to the results achieved by open pyeloplasty. Our results indicate minimal morbidity such as pain and a quick return to normal activities. The hospital stay is significantly reduced, although the operative times are long compared with open pyeloplasty.

[Multislice CT arteriography in the pre-surgical evaluation of patients with ureteropelvic junction stenosis]

INTRODUCTION

The current treatment of choice for ureteropelvic stenosis is endopyelotomy, but the presence of vessels in contact with the stenotic area of the ureteropelvic junction reduces the success of these interventions and increases vascular and hemorrhagic complications. The aim of our study was to use multislice CT arteriography to evaluate patients prior to surgery for ureteropelvic junction stenosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

16 patients with ureteropelvic junction stenosis underwent multislice CT arteriography; multidirectional images and three-dimensional reconstructions were used to identify and characterize vessels in contact with the stenotic area of the ureteropelvic junction.

RESULTS

A total of eight vessels (four arteries and four veins) in six (38%) patients were found in contact with or passing within 2 mm of the ureteropelvic junction. The vessels were located anterior to the junction in four cases; it was posterior in one case, and anteromedial in the other. Endopyelotomy was contraindicated in the six patients in whom vessels were found in contact with the ureteropelvic junction. The presence of the vessels was confirmed during surgery in five of these patients; the remaining patient did not undergo surgery).

CONCLUSION

Multislice CT arteriography allows adequate presurgical evaluation of ureteropelvic junction stenosis, detecting the presence of crossing vessels and facilitating the planning of the surgical approach in these patients.

Retrograde endopyelotomy: a comparison between laser and Acucise balloon cutting catheter

Endopyelotomy and laparoscopic pyeloplasty are the preferred modalities for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction because of their minimally invasive nature. There are continuous efforts for improving endopyelotomy techniques and outcome. Retrograde access represents the natural evolution of endopyelotomy. The Acucise cutting balloon catheter (Applied Medical Resources Corp., Laguna Hills, CA) and ureteroscopic endopyelotomy using holmium laser are the most widely accepted techniques. The Acucise catheter was developed to simplify retrograde endopyelotomy and made it possible for all urologists, regardless of their endourologic skills. The Acucise catheter depends on incision and dilatation of the ureteropelvic junction under fluoroscopic guidance, whereas ureteroscopy allows visual control of the site, depth, and extent of the incision; the holmium laser is a perfect method for a clean precise incision. Review of the English literature showed that the Acucise technique was more widely performed, though laser had better (but not statistically significant) safety and efficacy profiles.

Multidetector computed tomography arteriography in the preoperative assessment of patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction

BACKGROUND

Nowadays, endoscopic management of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction is the treatment of choice. However, in the presence of crossing vessels, the success rate of endoscopic management decreases and the risk of hemorrhagic and vascular complications rises. The purpose of this study is to evaluate patients with UPJ obstruction using contrast enhanced multidetector computed tomography (CT) angiography to aid in surgical planning and management.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2001 and 2005, 27 patients (mean age: 43 years; age range: 17-75 years) with UPJ obstruction were studied with multidetector CT angiography. Identification and characterization of crossing vessels was performed with multidirectional images and three-directional reconstructions.

RESULTS

12 patients (44%) were found to have 16 crossing vessels (vessels in contact with the UPJ or within a vicinity of less than 2 mm). Nine of these vessels were arteries and seven were veins. Nine vessels crossed anteriorly, two posteriorly, and one anteromedially. Endopyelotomy was contraindicated in these 12 patients due to the presence of crossing vessels. Eleven out of the 12 patients underwent a pyeloplasty by open surgery or laparoscopy, where the presence of crossing vessels was confirmed. One of the 12 patients did not undergo surgery.

CONCLUSION

Multidetector CT angiography permits an adequate preoperative assessment of patients with UPJ obstruction as it is able to identify the presence and location of crossing vessels. Furthermore, it allows to study in detail the anatomy of the renal area and its vascular variants.

Reconstructive surgery of the upper urinary tract

This paper reviews the major publications over the past year regarding upper urinary tract reconstruction. Controversies in the diagnosis of ureteropelvic junction obstruction and in the surgical repair of the obstructed upper urinary tract are discussed. Special emphasis is placed on issues surrounding minimally invasive techniques.

Minimally Invasive Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Optimizing Outcomes with Concomitant Cost Reduction

With the seemingly exponential increase in the use of minimally invasive techniques in urology, cost-benefit comparisons will continue to play a major part in establishing services and in improving those that already exist. The management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction is a focus of significant attention. An effective way of optimizing the economy of management is to understand the implications in terms of the success of each mode of treatment. Subsequently, costing models should be developed and applied in large-scale multicenter studies with the aid of health economists. The long-term benefits can then be assessed by also including patient's perceived quality of life. Economic assessment will not be enough to promote cost-effective practices. The take-up of any techniques will always be influenced not only by patient preference and surgeon expertise but also, perhaps ironically, by the way hospitals and surgeons are remunerated. In addition, the impact of the time taken to train a surgeon to carry out laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty competently may play a significant role. Until these issues are resolved, definitive recommendation for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction will continue to be made on an individual basis.

Laparoscopy Versus Dorsal Lumbotomy for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Repair

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty offers similar success rates compared to open surgery. However, the advanced laparoscopic skills required may limit its widespread application. In select patients the dorsal lumbotomy approach can provide similar postoperative advantages to minimally invasive surgery. We analyze the perioperative management of laparoscopy vs dorsal lumbotomy for the repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective review 13 patients who underwent dorsal lumbotomy pyeloplasty were compared to 19 patients who underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty between 1998 and 2003. Preoperative confirmation of obstruction was obtained through excretory urogram or renal Lasix scan. All 13 patients undergoing dorsal lumbotomy had a dismembered pyeloplasty. Of the 19 laparoscopic cases 16 had a dismembered pyeloplasty and 3 had a Fenger procedure. Average followup was 12 months for the open group and 13.3 months for the laparoscopic group. Postoperative results were evaluated with excretory urogram or renal Lasix scan as well as subjective outcomes by the patients.

RESULTS

Operative time was slightly longer for the laparoscopy group at 231 minutes vs 200 minutes. Estimated blood loss and postoperative morphine requirements were also similar. Hospital stay was 3.3 days for the dorsal lumbotomy group compared to 2.4 for the laparoscopy group. The overall success rate for the laparoscopic group was 94.7% compared to 100% for the dorsal lumbotomy group. Each group had 1 complication, paresthesia of anterior/medial thigh that resolved by 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary results show that a dismembered dorsal lumbotomy pyeloplasty is comparable to laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty with regard to intraoperative and postoperative hospital course.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: a combined experience

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The need for advanced laparoscopic skills limits the implementation of laparoscopic pyeloplasty to centers with extensive experience. The introduction of robotic technology into the field of minimally invasive surgery has facilitated complex surgical dissection and genitourinary reconstruction. We report our experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty using the daVinci Surgical System at three New York City medical centers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of all robot-assisted laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty cases in 18 female and 17 male patients between April 2001 and January 2004 was performed. The average patient age was 39.0 years (range 15-69 years). All patients had symptoms or radiographic evidence of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction. Robotic assistance with the daVinci Surgical System was employed after preparation of the UPJ with a standard laparoscopic approach.

RESULTS

The mean operative time and suturing time was 216.4 +/- 52.9 minutes and 63.0 +/- 14.2 minutes, respectively. The average estimated blood loss was minimal at 73.9 +/- 58.3 mL. The mean length of hospitalization was 69.4 hours (range 28-310 hours). The average use of intravenous morphine was 28.4 mg (range 0-162 mg). There were no intraoperative complications or open conversions. A mean follow-up of 7.9 months revealed a success rate of 94%, with two patients requiring further treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This combined multi-institutional series reveals that robot-assisted pyeloplasty with the daVinci Surgical System is safe and reproducible. These intermediate results appear comparable to those of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty repairs.

Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: History, Evolution, and Future

Ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction is characterized by a functionally significant impairment of urinary transport caused by obstruction in the area where the ureter joins the renal pelvis. The majority of cases are congenital; however, acquired conditions at the level of the UPJ may also present with symptoms and signs of obstruction. Until recently, open pyeloplasty and endoscopic techniques have been the main surgical options with the intent of complete excision or incision of the obstruction. The introduction of laparoscopy has allowed minimally invasive reconstructive surgery that mirrors open surgical techniques. In the hands of experienced surgeons, laparoscopic pyeloplasty offers a less invasive alternative to open surgery with decreased morbidity, shorter hospital stay, and faster convalescence. During the last decade, laparoscopic pyeloplasty for the treatment of congenital or acquired UPJ obstruction has garnered much interest, but, as this procedure is technically challenging, it is being performed only at selected medical centers by surgeons with advanced laparoscopic training. This review describes the early results, ongoing evaluation, and future role for this novel surgical procedure.

Renal imaging: what the urologist wants to know

Preoperative imaging in renal surgery is of utmost importance in contemporary surgical practice. From a diagnostic standpoint, imaging discovers many renal tumors incidentally before they become symptomatic. These tumors often are amenable to partial renal resection or minimally invasive surgical approaches. In general, surgical interventions for renal abnormalities have evolved to a less invasive endourologic or laparoscopic approach. Selection of the appropriate surgical intervention for renal tumors, collecting system tumors, and hydronephrosis depends heavily on the anatomy of the renal pathology. Thus, renal imaging is crucial in clinical decision-making. This article reviews the contribution of imaging to the surgical management of renal tumors, upper tract urothelial tumors, and ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Retrograde Acucise Endopyelotomy: Is It Worth Its Cost?

PURPOSE

To identify patients with ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction who will benefit from endoscopic Acucise incision of the stenosis and to compare the open Hynes-Anderson pyeloplasty with this minimally invasive technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective trial, 22 patients with primary and secondary UPJ obstruction were treated by Acucise endopyelotomy, and 18 patients were treated by Hynes-Anderson pyeloplasty. Preoperative and postoperative renal scans were used to determine the degree of obstruction and intravenous urography, ultrasound scanning, or both to assess the degree of dilation.

RESULTS

There was a vast difference in the cure rate of the two groups: Hynes-Anderson pyeloplasty cured 94.5% of the patients, while in the Acucise group, the cure rate was only 32%. There was some improvement in another 22% of the patients, but the renal scan curve remained obstructed. The remaining 45% of patients failed to show any improvement.

CONCLUSION

Acucise endopyelotomy will improve or cure only patients with good renal function and mild dilation of the pelvicaliceal system. Patients with severe dilation should be treated by Hynes-Anderson pyeloplasty.

Acucise™ endopyelotomy in a porcine model: procedure standardization and analysis of safety and immediate efficacy

PURPOSE

The study here presented was done to test the technical reliability and immediate efficacy of the Acucise device using a standardized technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

56 Acucise procedures were performed in pigs by a single surgeon who used a standardized technique: insert 5F angiographic catheter bilaterally up to the midureter, perform retrograde pyelogram, Amplatz super-stiff guidewire is advanced up to the level of the renal pelvis, angiographic catheters are removed, Acucise catheter balloon is advanced to the ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) level, the super-stiff guide-wire is removed and the contrast medium in the renal pelvis is aspirated and replaced with distilled water, activate Acucise at 75 watts of pure cutting current, keep the balloon fully inflated for 10 minutes, perform retrograde ureteropyelogram to document extravasation, remove Acucise catheter and pass an ureteral stent and remove guide-wire.

RESULTS

In no case did the Acucise device present malfunction. The electrocautery activation time was 2.2 seconds (ranging from 2 to 4 seconds). The extravasation of contrast medium, visible by fluoroscopy, occurred in 53 of the 56 cases (94.6%). In no case there was any evidence of intraoperative hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that performing Acucise endopyelotomy routinely in a standardized manner could largely preclude intraoperative device malfunction and eliminate complications while achieving a successful incision in the UPJ. With the guidelines that were used in this study, we believe that Acucise endopyelotomy can be completed successfully and safely in the majority of selected patients with UPJ obstruction.

Laparoscopic Management of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Patients With Upper Urinary Tract Anomalies

PURPOSE

We report our experience with the laparoscopic management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in patients with upper urinary tract abnormalities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between July 1994 and May 2002, 7 men and 4 women with upper urinary tract anatomical abnormalities were referred to our institution for management of symptomatic ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Anomalies included horseshoe kidneys in 5 cases, pelvic kidneys in 3, a pancake kidney in 1, a malrotated kidney in 1 and a duplicated collecting system in 1. Three patients had associated renal stones that were extracted during reconstruction. Mean patient age was 37.4 years (range 25 to 60). One patient had undergone a previously unsuccessful endopyelotomy and 2 had a history of abdominal surgery.

RESULTS

Mean operative time was 195 minutes (range 85 to 403) and mean estimated blood loss was 122 cc (range 20 to 300). No patient in this series required transfusion. Average length of hospital stay was 3.2 days (range 2 to 5). Renal function failed to improve after surgery in 1 patient with poor renal function and severe hydronephrosis. The remaining 10 patients (91%) had durable clinical and/or radiographic success during a followup of 32.6 and 21.3 months, respectively. There were no major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty is an effective treatment alternative for ureteropelvic junction obstruction associated with renal or urinary tract anomalies.

Helical computed tomography for identification of crossing vessels in ureteropelvic junction obstruction-comparison with operative findings

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the use of contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography (HCT) scanning with three-dimensional reconstructions as a possible identifier of crossing vessels in ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction. Endoscopic treatment of UPJ obstruction has a success rate that approaches 90%. These results drop to 40% in the presence of crossing vessels. Unrecognized crossing vessels can also result in significant hemorrhage during endopyelotomy. The presence of crossing vessels is, for many, an indication for open or laparoscopic UPJ repair. Therefore, accurate preoperative imaging is crucial for appropriate treatment planning.

METHODS

Our study population consisted of 18 patients evaluated and treated for UPJ obstruction at the University of Michigan Health System. These patients underwent routine contrast-enhanced preoperative HCT scanning before UPJ repair. A prior history of failed endoscopic treatment, patient preference, and HCT findings of crossing vessels were indications for open or laparoscopic repair. The imaging findings were compared with open findings during laparoscopic or open pyeloplasty.

RESULTS

An HCT finding of the presence of crossing vessels was a significant positive predictor, with a value of 100%. The sensitivity in this population was 91% and the specificity was 100%. No difference was noted between the detection of arterial or venous crossing vessels. The positive predictive value was 100%, and the negative predictive value was 88%.

CONCLUSIONS

HCT is an accurate predictor of the presence of crossing vessels in UPJ obstruction. Because crossing vessels may have a profound impact on treatment outcome, HCT can serve as an effective, noninvasive, preoperative screening tool.

Impact of hydronephrosis and renal function on treatment outcome: antegrade versus retrograde endopyelotomy

OBJECTIVES

To compare, in a single-surgeon, single-institution study, the efficacy of antegrade and retrograde endopyelotomy in terms of success rate and morbidity and to identify which risk factors affect treatment outcomes.

METHODS

The results were retrospectively reviewed for 88 patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction treated with endopyelotomy. Antegrade endopyelotomy was performed with a hook knife, scissors, or cutting balloon device. Retrograde endopyelotomy was performed with a cutting balloon device. Objective results were based on intravenous urogram and/or diuretic nuclear renal scan findings, and subjective results were based on direct patient query and questionnaire.

RESULTS

Ninety-three endopyelotomy procedures, 64 antegrade and 29 retrograde, were performed. The mean follow-up was 37.0 months (range 5 to 76). The overall success rates between antegrade and retrograde endopyelotomy (81.3% versus 75.9%) were not statistically different (P = 0.553). Patients with massive hydronephrosis and poor initial renal function were less likely to have successful endopyelotomy. Antegrade endopyelotomy, however, was more successful than retrograde endopyelotomy in patients with massive hydronephrosis (66.7% versus 20.0%; P = 0.046). The average operative time for antegrade and retrograde endopyelotomy was 93.9 and 32.7 minutes (P <0.001), respectively. The average length of hospital stay after antegrade and retrograde endopyelotomy was 3.20 and 0.14 nights (P <0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Both antegrade and retrograde endopyelotomy are effective treatments for ureteropelvic junction obstruction associated with minimal morbidity. Antegrade endopyelotomy appears to be more successful in patients with high-grade hydronephrosis. Retrograde endopyelotomy results in a shorter hospital stay, a shorter operative time, and less postoperative pain.

Cost-effective treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a decision tree analysis

PURPOSE

We determined the optimal treatment for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction based on cost using a decision tree model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search for articles addressing surgical correction of ureteropelvic junction obstruction was performed and data were abstracted on operative time, hospital stay, complications and success rate. The overall cost and individual cost centers at our institution for antegrade endopyelotomy, retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy, Acucise (Applied Medical Resources, Laguna Hills, California) endopyelotomy, laparoscopic pyeloplasty and open pyeloplasty were compared. A decision tree model estimated the cost of treatment and followup for each modality using commercially available software. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of individual treatment variables on overall cost.

RESULTS

Based on cost center review retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy was the least costly procedure ($2,891). In the decision tree model the rank order of overall treatment costs was: retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy ($3,842), Acucise endopyelotomy ($4,427), antegrade endopyelotomy ($5,297), laparoscopic pyeloplasty ($7,026) and open pyeloplasty ($7,119). Despite various hospital stay, operative time, equipment cost and success rate data 1-way sensitivity analysis revealed that antegrade endopyelotomy, laparoscopic pyeloplasty and open pyeloplasty were never cost effective compared with retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy or Acucise endopyelotomy, while 2-way sensitivity analysis favored retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary cost variables for ureteropelvic junction obstruction treatments include operative time, hospital stay, equipment cost and success rate. Decision tree analysis showed that retrograde ureteroscopic or Acucise endopyelotomy is the most cost-effective treatment modality at our institution. However, cost is only 1 of a number of factors that are considered when deciding on an optimal course of treatment.

Laparoscopic treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction

OBJECTIVES

To assess retrospectively the subjective and objective outcomes achieved after laparoscopic treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction at our institutions.

METHODS

Between August 1999 and July 2001, 19 patients (11 women and 8 men), with a mean age of 31.2 years (range 17 to 67), underwent laparoscopic treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Of these, 17 patients were eligible for postoperative analysis. Nine of these patients had a history of prior surgical intervention on the affected side. The patients were subjectively assessed by an analog pain scale performed before and at least 6 months after surgery. Preoperatively, patients had a diuretic renal scan to confirm the presence of obstruction. Helical computed tomography was also performed preoperatively to assess for the presence of crossing vessels. The renal scan was repeated at least 12 weeks after surgery to document the relief of obstruction objectively.

RESULTS

Helical computed tomography correctly predicted the presence of crossing vessels in 12 patients (63%). The Anderson-Hynes and Fenger pyeloplasty techniques were performed in 16 and 2 patients, respectively. In 1 patient, a small crossing vein over the ureteropelvic junction was identified and divided without complications. The average operative time was 240 minutes (range 128 to 470). The blood loss was minimal, and no open conversions were required. The mean hospital stay was 2.9 days (range 2 to 7). Two postoperative complications occurred (11.7%). The average subjective follow-up was 14.4 months (range 6 to 27), and the average objective follow-up was 7.8 months (range 3 to 12). Of 17 assessable patients, 16 (94%) had subjective and objective success (postoperative improvement in analog pain score and half-life of radiotracer washout). The average split renal function improved from 34.1% to 38.5% (P <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of our data, laparoscopic pyeloplasty has a similar success rate compared with the traditional open approach and better results than other minimally invasive techniques. Longer follow-up and further experience are needed to validate these data.

The role of Acucise endopyelotomy in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction

OBJECTIVE

Open surgical pyeloplasty has been the gold standard for the correction of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Endourological management of UPJO has gained increased acceptance, with reported success rates of 57-87%. It has been suggested that Acucise endopyelotomy (AE) should be the procedure of choice for patients with UPJO. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of AE in the treatment of UPJO and the factors contributing to surgical outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-two patients (34 primary, 8 secondary UPJO) underwent AE between June 1995 and December 1999. Presenting symptoms were; pain 34 (80.9%), UTI 10 (23.8%) and haematuria 5 (11.9%). Preoperative evaluation included ultrasound and/or intravenous urogram with diuretic renography. Hydronephrosis was graded in 36 patients. Of these 4, 14, 9 and 9 had grade I, II, III and IV hydronephrosis, respectively. Twenty-four patients were stented prior to endopyelotomy and one required nephrostomy. Overall (true) success was defined as clinically pain free and radiologically no evidence of obstruction on diuretic scan.

RESULTS

The average operating time was 45 min and mean hospital stay was 2.7 days. Mean follow-up was 27 months (range 6-55). The objective success rate was 52% and the subjective success rate was 64%. A total of 19 patients (45.2%) had long lasting clinical and radiographic treatment success. Three (7%) patients required nephrectomy and five (12%) underwent open pyeloplasty. Success rate for grade I/II hydronephrosis was 55.5% and only 27.7% with grade III/IV hydronephrosis. Normal renograms were found in 12 (48%) of those with perioperative extravasation compared to three (25%) without. Only one of the eight patients with secondary UPJO had a normal post-operative renogram. Size or type of stent used had no effect on surgical outcome. The substandard results were noted in patients with grade III/IV hydronephrosis, poor pre-operative renal function, secondary UPJO and without perioperative extravasation.

CONCLUSIONS

Acucise endopyelotomy is a safe and minimally invasive procedure for the management of UPJO. Although the results of AE are suboptimal, its lower degree of invasiveness makes it reasonable choice for first-line treatment. Careful selection of patients will improve the results of AE, although multicentre randomized trials are needed to make a valued comparison with other techniques.

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Retrograde endopyelotomy

The modern day treatment of UPJO with retrograde endopyelotomy continues to evolve as experience and knowledge progress. Use of the straight lateral incision and selective use of spiral CT angiogram has refined treatment decisions with retrograde endopyelotomy further. The authors' decision-oriented approach offers guidelines for the practicing urologist. Ultimately, it is up to the urologist and the patient to select the best approach for each clinical scenario.

Laparoscopy in urology

Mention of all of the procedures in urology that have been attempted, or are being done, laparoscopically is beyond the scope of this article. The laparoscopic procedures outlined in this article are gaining increasing support as surgeons attempt to redefine gold standard minimally invasive therapies in the new millennium. Additional procedures, such as laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissections for low-stage, nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancers and laparoscopic renal cryoablation of small renal cancers, are soon to be added to this list. As laparoscopic instrumentation and equipment continue to improve, it will become possible to explore even more procedures laparoscopically. Advances in imaging techniques, lasers, miniaturized robotics, and other areas may further define what is meant by the term minimal access surgery in the decades to follow.

Acucise endopyelotomy

INTRODUCTION

The evolution of minimally invasive therapy for ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction has culminated with the Acucise endopyelotomy. Antegrade endopyelotomy, laparoscopic pyeloplasty, and ureteroscopic endopyelotomy all offer excellent minimally invasive alternatives to open pyeloplasty, yet still represent more invasive techniques than the Acucise endopyelotomy in treating the obstructed UPJ.

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

The Acucise endopyelotomy is a straightforward, efficacious, and safe procedure in the appropriate patient for treating UPJ obstruction. Under fluoroscopic guidance, the latest version of the Acucise allows the urologist to perform a retrograde pyelogram, position the Acucise catheter, make the incision, and place a ureteral stent, all over a single guide wire. In my experience, this latest technical modification has further simplified the procedure for the practicing urologist.

CONCLUSIONS

In 2000, the Acucise endopyelotomy continues to represent an excellent minimally invasive option for all urologists who choose to perform endopyelotomies.

Endopyelotomy outcome as a function of high versus dependent ureteral insertion

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether a high versus a dependent ureteral insertion significantly affects the outcome of endopyelotomy for management of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction.

METHODS

Sixty patients with UPJ obstruction were treated with an endopyelotomy by way of either an antegrade percutaneous approach (n = 36) or a retrograde hot-wire balloon incision (n = 24). In these 60 patients, the ureteral insertion was high on the renal pelvis in 19 (32%), dependent in 25 (42%), and indeterminate in 16 (26%). Intravenous urography was performed 4 to 6 weeks after stent removal (8 to 12 weeks after endopyelotomy) and then at 6 to 12-month intervals. Success of the procedure was defined as resolution of symptoms and decrease in hydronephrosis compared with pre-endopyelotomy studies.

RESULTS

With a follow-up range of 2 to 41 months (mean 10.3), the overall success rate was 80%. This rate was independent of whether the procedure was performed in an antegrade or retrograde fashion. A successful result was achieved in 15 (78.9%) of those with a high insertion, 19 (76%) of those with a dependent insertion, and 14 (87.5%) of those with an equivocal insertion; these differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

The type of ureteral insertion (ie, high versus dependent) had no significant impact on the outcome of endopyelotomy by way of either a percutaneous or retrograde approach. As such, these anatomic variations need not play a role in a decision-making algorithm for contemporary management of UPJ obstruction.

Retrograde Acucise endopyelotomy: long-term results

PURPOSE

We evaluated the long-term outcome of retrograde endopyelotomy with the Acucise cutting balloon as a first-line treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in 36 patients (median age 44 years).

PATIENTS

Twenty-three patients had a primary UPJO. The median follow-up in the series was 24 (6-42) months.

RESULTS

Success, defined as a subjective and objective improvement, was obtained in 27 (75%). In multivariate analysis, only the presence of a crossing vessel (45% v. 81%) was a significant covariate for success. The success rates for primary and secondary UPJO were 74% and 77% respectively. The grade of obstruction had no impact on results. The median time to the nine failures was 3 months, and no failure occurred more than 6 months after the endopyelotomy. In 75% of the failures with no crossing vessel, redo retrograde Acucise endopyelotomy was successful.

CONCLUSION

Retrograde Acucise endopyelotomy is an efficient long-term treatment of UPJO with low morbidity. This technique is a reasonable choice for first-line treatment of UPJO.

Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: assessment of objective and subjective outcome

PURPOSE

We determine the subjective and objective durability of laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From August 1993 to April 1997, 42 patients underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty (laparoscopy group) with a minimum clinical followup of 12 months (mean 22). Subjective outcomes and objective findings were compared to those of 35 patients who underwent open pyeloplasty (open surgery group) from August 1986 to April 1997 with a minimum clinical followup of 12 months (mean 58). We assessed clinical outcome based on responses to a subjective analog pain and activity scale. In addition, radiographic outcome was assessed based on the results of the most recent radiographic study.

RESULTS

Of the 42 laparoscopy group patients 90% (38) were pain-free (26, 62%) or had significant improvement in flank pain (12, 29%) after surgery. Two patients had only minor improvement and 2 had no improvement in pain. Surgery failed in only 1 patient with complete obstruction. A patent ureteropelvic junction was demonstrated in 98% (41 of 42 patients) of the laparoscopy group on the most recent radiographic study (mean radiographic followup 15 months). Of the 35 open surgery group patients 91% were pain-free (21, 60%) or significantly improved (11, 31%) after surgery. One patient had only minor improvement and 2 were worse.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain relief, improved activity level and relief of obstruction outcomes are equivalent for laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty.

Endobrst: simple and safe is best

Minimal-access treatment for ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction is becoming increasingly complex. Is there still a place for the simple procedure of balloon dilatation? To examine the symptomatic and renographic results of patients at least 6 months after balloon disruption of an obstructed UPJ, we carried out a prospective audit of outcome as judged by DTPA renograms and clinical follow-up. The procedure has been performed on a total of 21 renal units (20 patients) with follow-up of 6 to 30 months (mean 22 months). Of these, 18 (86%) were asymptomatic at 3 months, although this success rate dropped to 17 (81%) by 6 months. Renographic split function improved in 11 renal units, and excretion improve in 14. Perioperative complications were few and associated with stent insertion. Three of the patients in whom the procedure failed went on to nephrectomy (14%); all had poor renal function (split <20%) at presentation. Although the quoted success rates are lower for endoluminal balloon rupture of stenosis treatment than open pyeloplasty, the former technique has significantly less morbidity. Our nephrectomy rate reflects our less than ideal early patient selection, and our balloon dilation technique is not recommended as a salvage procedure for patients in whom nephrectomy is inevitable. The learning curve is quick to climb, and this is a fundamentally simple procedure with medium-term results that remain encouraging.

Adult endopyelotomy: impact of etiology and antegrade versus retrograde approach on outcome

PURPOSE

We evaluate our experience with endopyelotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction by stratifying the results of an antegrade versus a retrograde approach for primary, secondary, calculi related, high insertion and impaired renal function related obstruction, individually.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed results of 149 nonrandomized patients treated for ureteropelvic junction obstruction, of whom 83 underwent antegrade percutaneous endopyelotomy using a right angle Greenwald electrode and 66 underwent retrograde endopyelotomy using a cutting balloon device. Subjective results were based on an analog pain scale, objective results on renal scan, excretory urography or Whitaker test and cost-effectiveness analysis on total treatment cost.

RESULTS

In both primary and secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction, retrograde endopyelotomy was related to a significantly shorter operating room time and hospital stay (p < 0.05). When treating noncalculous primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction (92 patients) there was a better objective, albeit not statistically significant, success rate with antegrade endopyelotomy (89 versus 71%) but retrograde endopyelotomy was 20% more cost-effective. When treating secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction (37 patients) there was a better objective, albeit not statistically significant, success rate (83 versus 77%) with retrograde endopyelotomy, which was 37% more cost-effective. Complication rates were higher with antegrade compared to retrograde endopyelotomy for primary and secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction (25 versus 14% and 26 versus 0%). In 20 patients with concomitant stones endopyelotomy results were better (93 to 100% success) than for any other categories of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Of note, endopyelotomy also provided a reasonable outcome among patients with a high insertion primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction (70% success).

CONCLUSIONS

Antegrade endopyelotomy is the preferred approach in patients with primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction and concomitant renal calculi (13.4% of cases), and may also be preferable in patients with high insertion obstruction (6.7%). For all other primary and all secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction, antegrade and retrograde endopyelotomy is effective therapy yet retrograde endopyelotomy results in less operating room time, shorter hospital stay, fewer complications and significantly less expense to achieve the desired outcome.

Pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction treated with Acucise retrograde endopyelotomy

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of retrograde endopyelotomy for the treatment of pelvi-ureteric junction (PUJ) obstruction using the Acucise ureteric balloon cutting catheter.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between February 1995 and July 1997, 13 consecutive patients with primary PUJ obstruction underwent Acucise endopyelotomy at our institution. The mean follow-up was 17.7 months (range 7-33). The success of the procedure was based on objective patency on follow-up diuretic isotopic renography and the subjective resolution of symptoms.

RESULTS

The treatment was successful by objective criteria in eight of 13 patients and by subjective criteria in nine. The mean operative duration was 33 min (range 25-45) and all 13 patients were discharged within 24 h of the procedure. There were no major complications, such as vascular injury requiring transfusion. There were no delayed failures, as all failures occurred within 3 months of the procedure. Of the four total failures, two patients have successfully undergone open pyeloplasty and one other was found to have a crossing vessel at the lower pole at the time of the operation.

CONCLUSION

In this small series. Acucise endopyelotomy was a safe procedure that offered effective, expeditious first-line treatment for PUJ obstruction. All failures occurred soon after treatment and did not hinder subsequent open pyeloplasty. Further studies with additional patients and a longer follow-up are warranted to determine the long-term efficacy of this promising new treatment.

Vascular anatomy at the ureteropelvic junction

In 65% of the cases regarding the ventral surface of the UPJ, there was a prominent artery, vein, or both in close relation to the ventral surface of the UPJ. In only 6.8% there was an inferior polar artery crossing anteriorly to the UPJ. Therefore, many of the vessels visualized close to the UPJ and described as anomalous and etiologic in obstruction are normal segmental arteries that do not cause UPJ obstruction. In 26.7% of cases regarding the dorsal surface of the UPJ, there was a vessel crossing at or lower than 1.5 cm above the posterior surface of the UPJ. On the basis of our anatomic findings, we advise that in endopyelotomy, the incision along the stenotic UPJ be created only at its lateral aspect.

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Indications, technique, and long-term outcome

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty is one of several minimally invasive treatment options for UPJ obstruction. In fact, several endoscopically and fluoroscopically controlled methods of incising the obstructed UPJ are now available that are significantly less invasive and less morbid in comparison with open pyeloplasty. However, the long-term success rates of these incisional techniques are less than the rates reported for open pyeloplasty. Several causes of obstruction may be present in the primarily obstructed UPJ, including kinking or compression related to crossing vessels or intrinsic narrowing at the UPJ. One potential reason for the inferior success rates of incisional methods in comparison with open pyeloplasty is that the former techniques address the intrinsically narrowed UPJ but may not address extrinsic problems such as kinking of the ureter associated with fibrotic bands or compression from crossing vessels. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty addresses all potential causes of obstruction. Any fibrotic bands kinking the ureter are divided, and the ureter is spatulated through the level of the UPJ prior to completion of the anastomosis. If a crossing vessel is encountered, a dismembered pyeloplasty is performed, the ureter and renal pelvis are transposed to the opposite side of the vessels, and the anastomosis is completed. An additional disadvantage of incisional techniques is the significant risk of hemorrhage following incision of the UPJ, with as many as 3% to 11% of patients requiring blood transfusion. Hemorrhage may occur owing to an errant anterior incision, the presence of a crossing vessel, incision into the renal parenchyma adjacent to the UPJ, or as the result of bleeding from the percutaneous access site. In contrast, mean estimated blood loss in the authors' series of 57 laparoscopic pyeloplasties was 139 mL, and none of the patients required blood transfusion. Although it is more morbid in comparison with retrograde or fluoroscopically controlled endopyelotomy, laparoscopic pyeloplasty seems at least comparable to antegrade percutaneous endopyelotomy in terms of the length of hospitalization and patient convalescence. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty, however, offers a higher success rate than with incisional techniques, not only from a radiographic standpoint but from a subjective standpoint as determined by the results of the analogue pain and activity questionnaire. The major disadvantage of laparoscopic pyeloplasty is the need for proficiency in laparoscopic techniques and for a longer operative time. As a result, the literature on laparoscopic pyeloplasty consists primarily of small series. Janetschek and co-workers reported on a series of 17 patients who underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty, including 14 via a transperitoneal approach and 3 via a retroperitoneal approach. Procedures performed included ureterolysis alone, dismembered pyeloplasty, and nondismembered (Fenger) pyeloplasty. "Fenger-plasty" is similar to Y-V pyeloplasty and is performed by incising the UPJ longitudinally and closing the incision transversely in a Heineke-Mikulicz fashion. Janetschek and colleagues reported a 100% success in the eight patients who underwent dismembered pyeloplasty but believed that this technique was too cumbersome and should be reserved for patients with long stenoses, dorsally crossing vessels, or large renal pelvis. Because two of the four patients undergoing ureterolysis alone failed treatment, Janetschek and colleagues have abandoned this technique. They now prefer the Fenger-plasty technique, even in the setting of ventrally crossing vessels, because the technique can be performed quickly with one to three sutures, and the anastomosis can be sealed with fibrin glue and a flap of Gerota's fascia. Their experience with this technique, however, remains relatively limited. Technologic advances such as the Endostitch device have facilitated reconstructive laparoscopic procedures such as pyeloplasty. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Endopyelotomy. Prognostic factors and patient selection

Although clearly a valid alternative to dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults, endo(uretero)pyelotomy has not been universally accepted in the general urologic community because of the 10% to 30% inferior success rate and the concern regarding hemorrhagic complications. Identification of prognostic factors for success and complications are therefore of primary importance. The length of stricture, the grade of hydronephrosis, and the level of renal function are well recognized prognostic factors. Crossing vessels also play a role, and in association with the grade of hydronephrosis, they seem to be a major prognosticator of outcome. With attention to such prognostic factors, and appropriate patient selection, results can now approach the gold standard of dismembered pyeloplasty.

Antegrade endopyelotomy

Antegrade endopyelotomy has become the procedure of choice for patients with UPJ obstruction. Overall success rates of 85% can be expected when the procedure is used in a broad spectrum of patients. Contraindications include an uncorrected bleeding diathesis, untreated infection, and any anatomic abnormality precluding safe percutaneous access.

Obstructive uropathy

Recent study has increased the understanding of the physiological processes occurring in obstructive uropathy, in particular the role played by vasoactive mediators and cellular mechanisms. There is an emphasis on developing effective and less invasive means of detection and treatment of ureteric obstruction, although it remains to be determined how the techniques currently being assessed will impact on clinical practice.