Characterization of Patients with Androgen-Independent Prostatic Carcinoma Whose Serum Prostate Specific Antigen Decreased Following Flutamide Withdrawal

PSA response to antiandrogen withdrawal: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Antiandrogen withdrawal (AAW) response is the paradoxical decrease in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) following the withdrawal of antiandrogen in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Currently, the reported literature on the proportion of patients exhibiting AAW response and the differences in PSA response between the types of antiandrogens is unclear.

METHODS

This review aimed to explore the PSA response to AAW and to identify if the response depends on the type of antiandrogens. A literature search was performed using databases PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE with a cut-off date of 23rd of November 2020. Studies reporting on outcomes of AAW and prostate cancer were included. Studies were screened by two reviewers and relevant data extracted. Meta-analysis of outcomes was reported using random-effects and fixed-effects model. A subgroup analysis was performed for type of antiandrogen.

RESULTS

From 450 studies, 23 were included with a total of 1474 patients with advanced prostate cancer were available for further analysis. Overall, 395 (26%) patients had any reduction in PSA levels (95% CI: 20-32%) and 183 (11%) patients had a ≥50% reduction in PSA levels (95% CI: 6-16%). Among the 1212 patients on first-generation antiandrogens, 30% (95% CI: 23-38%) had any PSA decline with 15% patients having a ≥50% PSA decline (95% CI: 8-22%). In contrast, among the 108 patients on second-generation antiandrogens, 7% (95% CI: 0-13%) had any PSA decline and only 1% (95% CI: 0-5%) had a ≥50% PSA decline. Also, among the 154 patients on androgen synthesis inhibitors, 26% (95% CI: 19-33%) had any PSA decline and only 4% (95% CI: 0-13%) had a ≥50% PSA decline.

CONCLUSIONS

One-fourth of patients treated with AAW show a PSA response. However, PSA response to AAW is uncommon with second-generation antiandrogens and androgen synthesis inhibitors. Further research is required to understand the differences in response between the types of antiandrogen.

Treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Objective. An increasing number of patients with prostate cancer develop hormone-refractory disease after standard treatment modalities. In these patients, early clinical trials with chemotherapy produced disappointing response rates. However, clinical trials that employ response criteria such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and clinical benefit response have produced encouraging responses. This article reviews current and future treatment options for the management of hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Data Sources. A MEDLINE search for the years 1978 to 1998 was completed. The following terms were used in our search: prostate cancer, hormone-refractory, treatment, and chemotherapy. Relevant articles referenced in the literature obtained in our MEDLINE search were reviewed.

Study Selection. Randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials were used in our review. Clinical trials using prostate-specific antigen or a palliation of symptoms as primary criteria for response were given priority.

Data Synthesis. Several genetic alterations, including the overexpression of bcl-2 or mutations in p53, may lead to the development of hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Agents such as estramustine and taxanes, which affect microtubule function and potentially modulate bcl-2, appear to be particularly active in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer. In addition, mitoxantrone as well as other agents has been shown to be beneficial in improving the quality of life in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Conclusion. Hormone-refractory prostate cancer is not a chemotherapy-resistant disease as once believed; significant progress in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer has been made with new combinations of chemotherapy agents. Promising new treatments are currently under evaluation to assess their potential benefit over the standard treatment modalities that are currently available.

Switching and withdrawing hormonal agents for castration-resistant prostate cancer

The antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome (AAWS) is characterized by tumour regression and a decline in serum PSA on discontinuation of antiandrogen therapy in patients with prostate cancer. This phenomenon has been best described with the withdrawal of the nonsteroidal antiandrogens, bicalutamide and flutamide, but has also been reported with a wide range of hormonal agents. Mutations that occur in advanced prostate cancer and induce partial activation of the androgen receptor (AR) by hormonal agents have been suggested as the main causal mechanism of the AAWS. Corticosteroids, used singly or in conjunction with abiraterone, docetaxel and cabazitaxel might also be associated with the AAWS. The discovery of the Phe876Leu mutation in the AR, which is activated by enzalutamide, raises the possibility of withdrawal responses to novel hormonal agents. This Review focusses on the molecular mechanisms responsible for withdrawal responses, the role of AR mutations in the development of treatment resistance, and the evidence for the sequential use of antiandrogens in prostate cancer therapy. The implications of AR mutations for the development of novel drugs that target the AR are discussed, as are the challenges associated with redefining the utility of older treatments in the current therapeutic landscape.

Is there an anti-androgen withdrawal syndrome for enzalutamide?

BACKGROUND

The anti-androgen withdrawal syndrome (AAWS) can be seen in one-third of patients after discontinuation of first-generation non-steroidal anti-androgen therapy. With the introduction of new agents for anti-androgen therapy as well as alternate mechanisms of action, new therapeutic options before and after docetaxel chemotherapy have arisen (Ohlmann et al. in World J Urol 30(4):495-503, 2012). The question regarding the occurrence of an enzalutamide withdrawal syndrome (EWS) has not been evaluated yet. In this study, we assess prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response after discontinuation of enzalutamide.

METHODS

In total 31 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) underwent an enzalutamide withdrawal and were evaluated. Data were gathered from 6 centres in Germany. Patients with continuous oral administration of enzalutamide with rising serum PSA levels were evaluated, starting from enzalutamide withdrawal until subsequent therapy was initiated, follow-up ended or death of the patient occurred. Statistical evaluation was performed applying one-sided binomial testing using R-statistical software, version 3.0.1.

RESULTS

Mean withdrawal follow-up was 6.5 weeks (range 1-26.1 weeks). None of the 31 patients showed a PSA decline. Mean relative PSA rise over all patients was 73.9 % (range 0.5-440.7 %) with a median of 44.9 %.

CONCLUSIONS

If existent, an AAWS is at least very rare for enzalutamide in patients with mCRPC after taxane-based chemotherapy and does not play a clinical role in this setting. This may be attributed to the different pharmacodynamics of enzalutamide. Longer duration of therapy or a longer withdrawal interval may reveal a rare EWS in the future.

Non-metastatic CRPC and asymptomatic metastatic CRPC: which treatment for which patient?

The introduction of early PSa-based diagnosis has profoundly impacted the epidemiology of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Many patients enter the disease at an early stage when the only sign of resistance to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a progressive elevation of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). This created a very heterogeneous population of non-metastatic (M0) CRPC. PSa kinetics is the most powerful indicator of aggressiveness in that population and can be used to trigger imaging investigation and enrollment in clinical trials. Several registered and near to come treatments have not been tested in that population but in men with more advanced metastatic and often symptomatic disease. Several agents have been investigated to delay the onset of the first bone metastasis but only one, denosumab, has reached its end-point. Because CRPC remains largely driven by the androgen receptor (AR), physicians have relied on second-line hormonal manipulations to delay the progression of the disease, including first generation antiandrogens, adrenal synthesis inhibitors, steroids and estrogens. The data however are mostly limited to phase II trials.

Steroid derivatives as pure antagonists of the androgen receptor

BACKGROUND

While the androgens of testicular origin (representing about 50% of total androgens in men over 50 years) can be completely eliminated by surgical or medical castration with GnRH (gonadotropin-releasing hormone) agonists or antagonists, the antiandrogens currently available as blockers of androgen binding to the androgen receptor (AR), namely bicalutamide (BICA), flutamide (FLU) and nilutamide have too weak affinity to completely neutralize the other 50% of androgens made locally from dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in the prostate cancer tissue by the mechanisms of intracrinology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Series of steroid derivatives having pure and potent antagonistic activity on the human and rodent AR were synthesized. Assays of AR binding and activity in carcinoma mouse Shionogi and human LNCaP cells as well as in vivo bioavailability measurements and in vivo prostate weight assays in the rat were used.

RESULTS

The chosen lead steroidal compound, namely EM-5854, has a 3.7-fold higher affinity than BICA for the human AR while EM-5855, an important metabolite of EM-5854, has a 94-fold higher affinity for the human AR compared to BICA. EM-5854 and EM-5855 are 14 times more potent than BICA in inhibiting androgen (R1881)-stimulated prostatic specific antigen (PSA) secretion in human prostatic carcinoma LNCaP cells in vitro. MDV3100 has a potency comparable to bicalutamide in these assays. Depending upon the oral formulation, EM-5854 is 5- to 10-times more potent than BICA to inhibit dihydrotestosterone (DHT)-stimulated ventral prostatic weight in vivo in the rat while MDV3100 has lower activity than BICA in this in vivo model. These data are supported by respective 40-fold and 105-fold higher potencies of EM-5854 and EM-5855 compared to BICA to inhibit cell proliferation in the androgen-sensitive Shionogi carcinoma cell model.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the present preclinical results data need evaluation in clinical trials in men, combination of the data obtained in vitro in human LNCaP cells as indicator of potency in the human prostate and the data on metabolism evaluated in vivo on ventral prostate weight in the rat, could suggest the possibility of a 70- to 140-fold higher potency of EM-5854 compared to bicalutamide (Casodex) for the treatment of prostate cancer in men.

Blockade of testicular and adrenal androgens in prostate cancer treatment

Prostate cancer is the most hormone sensitive of all cancers. However, any hormonal therapeutic strategy must take into account the fact that two almost equivalent sources of androgens act in the prostate, namely testosterone of testicular origin, and the locally produced androgens testosterone and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) derived from dehydroepiandrosterone of adrenal origin. Combined androgen blockade--medical or surgical castration plus a pure antiandrogen--would, therefore, be the logical first-line treatment for prostate cancer, although castration or an antiandrogen alone is still chosen in the majority of cases. Although long-term control, or even cure, is possible when combined androgen blockade is used when the tumor is localized, resistance to treatment invariably develops in patients when start of treatment is delayed until the disease has become metastatic. This observation can be explained either by elevated levels of the androgen receptor, which can increase the response to low levels of androgens and also modify the response to antiandrogens; or by local biosynthesis of androgens. Research to identify new and more potent antiandrogens, as well as blockers of peripheral and adrenal androgen biosynthesis--such as abiraterone--could be of great importance.

Androgen regulates ADAMTS15 gene expression in prostate cancer cells

Prostate cancer is a major cause of mortality, largely as a consequence of metastases and transformation to androgen-independent growth. Metalloproteinases are implicated in cancer progression. A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTS) are expressed in prostate cancer cells, with ADAMTS-1 and ADAMTS-15 being the most abundant. ADAMTS-15 but not ADAMTS-1 expression was downregulated by androgen in LNCaP prostate cancer cells, possibly through androgen response elements associated with the gene. ADAMTS-15 expression is predictive for survival in breast cancer, and the situation may be similar in prostate cancer, as androgen independence is usually due to aberrant signaling through its receptor.

Hormonal therapy of prostate cancer

Of all cancers, prostate cancer is the most sensitive to hormones: it is thus very important to take advantage of this unique property and to always use optimal androgen blockade when hormone therapy is the appropriate treatment. A fundamental observation is that the serum testosterone concentration only reflects the amount of testosterone of testicular origin which is released in the blood from which it reaches all tissues. Recent data show, however, that an approximately equal amount of testosterone is made from dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) directly in the peripheral tissues, including the prostate, and does not appear in the blood. Consequently, after castration, the 95-97% fall in serum testosterone does not reflect the 40-50% testosterone (testo) and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) made locally in the prostate from DHEA of adrenal origin. In fact, while elimination of testicular androgens by castration alone has never been shown to prolong life in metastatic prostate cancer, combination of castration (surgical or medical with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist) with a pure anti-androgen has been the first treatment shown to prolong life. Most importantly, when applied at the localized stage, the same combined androgen blockade (CAB) can provide long-term control or cure of the disease in more than 90% of cases. Obviously, since prostate cancer usually grows and metastasizes without signs or symptoms, screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is absolutely needed to diagnose prostate cancer at an 'early' stage before metastasis occurs and the cancer becomes non-curable. While the role of androgens was believed to have become non-significant in cancer progressing under any form of androgen blockade, recent data have shown increased expression of the androgen receptor (AR) in treatment-resistant disease with a benefit of further androgen blockade. Since the available anti-androgens have low affinity for AR and cannot block androgen action completely, especially in the presence of increased AR levels, it becomes important to discover more potent and purely antagonistic blockers of AR. The data obtained with compounds under development are promising. While waiting for this (these) new anti-androgen(s), combined treatment with castration and a pure anti-androgen (bicalutamide, flutamide or nilutamide) is the only available and the best scientifically based means of treating prostate cancer by hormone therapy at any stage of the disease with the optimal chance of success and even cure in localized disease.

A dramatic, objective antiandrogen withdrawal response: case report and review of the literature

Antiandrogen withdrawal response is an increasingly recognized entity in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. To our knowledge, there have been no reports describing a durable radiologic improvement along with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) with discontinuation of the antiandrogen agent bicalutamide. We report a case in which a dramatic decline of serum PSA levels associated with a dramatic improvement in radiologic disease was achieved with bicalutamide discontinuation.

Antiandrogen withdrawal in castrate-refractory prostate cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group trial (SWOG 9426)

BACKGROUND

Antiandrogen withdrawal is a potential therapeutic maneuver for patients with progressive prostate cancer. This study was designed to examine antiandrogen withdrawal effects within the context of a large multi-institutional prospective trial.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria included progressive prostate adenocarcinoma despite combined androgen blockade. Eligible patients received prior initial treatment with an antiandrogen plus orchiectomy or luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist. Patients were stratified according to type of antiandrogen, type of progression (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] or radiographic), presence or absence of metastatic disease, and prior LHRH agonist versus surgical castration.

RESULTS

A total of 210 eligible and evaluable patients had a median follow-up of 5.0 years; 64% of patients previously received flutamide, 32% bicalutamide, and 3% nilutamide. Of the 210 patients, 21% of patients had confirmed PSA decreases of >or=50% (95% CI, 16% to 27%). No radiographic responses were recorded. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3 months (95% CI, 2 months to 4 months); however, 19% had 12-month or greater progression-free intervals. Median overall survival (OS) after antiandrogen withdrawal was 22 months (20 and 40 months for those with and without radiographic evidence of metastatic disease, respectively). Multivariate analyses indicated that longer duration of antiandrogen use, lower PSA at baseline, and PSA-only progression at study entry were associated with both longer PFS and OS. Longer antiandrogen use was the only significant predictor of PSA response.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate a relatively modest rate of PSA response in patients who were undergoing antiandrogen withdrawal; however, PFS can be relatively prolonged (>or=1 year) in approximately 19% of patients.

Immunotherapy for Prostate Cancer: What's the Future?

Prostate cancer is the most common noncutaneous cancer and second leading cause of cancer death among US men. A greater understanding of basic immunologic principles has led to a variety of new techniques,which has led to advancements in prostate cancer vaccines. This article discusses the rationale for the development of antibody-based therapy and vaccines therapy, including whole tumor cells, dendritic cells, and pox viral vectors. A summary of selected clinical studies incorporating these strategies and new approaches incorporating a combination of immunotherapy with traditional treatments for prostate cancer is presented.

Antiandrogen, vaccine and combination therapy in patients with nonmetastatic hormone refractory prostate cancer

PURPOSE

There is no current standard treatment for patients with prostate cancer who have received hormonal therapy but have an increasing prostate specific antigen (PSA) without radiographic evidence of metastasis. This trial was designed to analyze toxicity, immunogenicity and time to treatment failure using vaccine, antiandrogen therapy or their sequential use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 42 patients were randomized to receive vaccine vs antiandrogen therapy with nilutamide. The vaccine consisted of recombinant vaccinia viruses containing the PSA and B7.1 costimulatory genes as prime vaccinations, and avipox-PSA as boosters. After 6 months patients with an increasing PSA and no metastasis may receive a combination of both treatments.

RESULTS

Three patients on nilutamide were removed from study secondary to grade 3 toxicities but no grade 3 toxicities were attributed to vaccine. In the vaccine arm median time to treatment failure was 9.9 months with 13 of 21 decreases in PSA velocity vs 7.6 months with 16 of 21 decreases in PSA velocity in the nilutamide arm (p =0.28). Of the patients in the nilutamide arm 8 had vaccine added at the time of PSA progression. Median time to treatment failure with combined therapy was 5.2 months, with a median duration from study entry of 15.9 months. Of the patients in the vaccine arm 12 had nilutamide added at the time of PSA progression. Median time to treatment failure with combined therapy was 13.9 months and a median of 25.9 months from initiation of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies are merited to investigate the role of combining vaccine with antiandrogen therapy or vaccine followed by vaccine plus antiandrogen therapy in this patient population.

Prolonged Response to Nilutamide in a Patient with Stage D0.5 Prostate Cancer Who Previously Failed Androgen Deprivation Therapy

There is currently no standard therapy for patients with prostate cancer who have progressive rise in PSA levels despite treatment with hormonal ablation and antiandrogen withdrawal (stage D0.5). One potential treatment option is the use of a different androgen receptor antagonist (ARA), such as nilutamide. We report a case of a 66-year-old gentleman with greater than a 46 month sustained response to nilutamide therapy after failing bicalutamide therapy and its subsequent withdrawal. The patient continues to have undetectable PSA levels and an excellent performance status. This case demonstrates the prolonged response to a second-line ARA in patients deemed to have androgen insensitive prostate cancer. Further investigation of the potential role of nilutamide therapy as second-line antiandrogen therapy is warranted as monotherapy and/or in combination with other promising novel approaches including PSA-based vaccines.

Management of patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men in the UK, and the incidence of prostate cancer has increased dramatically over the past two decades. Although most men are diagnosed at early stage, more than 50% develop locally advanced or metastatic disease. Androgen ablation with luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists alone, or in combination with anti-androgens, is the standard treatment for men with metastatic prostate cancer. Unfortunately, almost all men develop progressive disease after a variable time period, despite the maximal androgen blockade. The management of hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) is challenging, as there is no uniformly accepted strategy. Various treatment options, including second-line hormone therapy, are discussed. Chemotherapy is being increasingly used and, importantly, docetaxel and estramustine may play an important role in the near future. The role of radiotherapy, strontium-89, bisphosphonates, novel agents and future therapies are also outlined.

Vaccine Therapy for a Patient with Androgen-Insensitive Prostate Cancer without Evidence of Measurable Disease on Scans

Androgen ablation therapy is the mainstay treatment of patients who have failed local therapy for prostate cancer. PSA is a serum marker commonly used to monitor patients who have undergone primary therapy for evidence of disease progression. However, there currently is no standard therapy for patients once they have demonstrated disease progression. We report a case of a 65-year-old man with castrate testosterone levels but a rising serum PSA level without radiographic evidence of metastasis. After failing prior antiandrogen therapy, he enrolled on a clinical trial comparing a PSA-based vaccine with nilutamide. When his PSA level rose on nilutamide, he commenced treatment with the vaccine therapy. He has continued to have a PSA response with the vaccine treatments with no radiographic evidence disease for >20 months.

Prostate-specific antigen doubling time predicts response to deferred antiandrogen therapy in men with androgen-independent prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To identify the pretreatment variables that are predictive of response and the duration of response to deferred antiandrogen therapy in men with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC).

METHODS

A total of 375 patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer between 1977 and 2002 had medical records available for retrospective review. Of these 375 patients, 163 were diagnosed with AIPC. The inclusion criteria included (1) diagnosis of AIPC and (2) treatment with deferred antiandrogen therapy. AIPC was biochemically defined as two consecutive rises in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level during androgen deprivation therapy. The treatment response to deferred antiandrogen therapy was defined as a 50% or greater decline in the pretreatment PSA level. The prognostic value of various pretreatment parameters was determined with the appropriate statistical methods and tested with a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Of the 163 patients with AIPC, 36 were treated with deferred antiandrogen therapy. Of these 36 patients, 12 (33.3%) experienced a PSA response. The median PSA failure-free survival was 9.0 months (95% confidence interval 5.2 to 12.9). The only pretreatment variable predictive of a PSA response was the PSA doubling time (PSADT). The mean PSADT in responders was 12.7 months versus 7.5 months in nonresponders (P = 0.037). Moreover, PSADT was the only statistically significant variable on univariate analysis of PSA failure-free survival in responders (hazard ratio 0.202, 95% confidence interval 0.041 to 0.990, P = 0.049). No statistically significant difference was found in cancer-specific survival between responders and nonresponders (P = 0.1501).

CONCLUSIONS

The PSADT predicted both the response and the duration of the response to deferred antiandrogen therapy in patients diagnosed with AIPC.

Hormone-refractory Prostate Cancer

For more than five decades, the preferred treatment for advanced prostate cancer has been suppression of androgen production by medical or surgical castration. However, all patients treated with androgen deprivation eventually develop resistant disease as manifested by increasing prostate-specific antigen levels, progressive disease on imaging studies, and ultimately worsening symptoms. The treatment of patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), once thought to represent a relatively futile endeavor, has changed significantly in the past several years with the development of new therapeutics. One of the most important new treatment strategies involves secondary hormonal manipulation after the failure of primary androgen deprivation; this approach is predicated on the recognition that HRPC is a heterogenous disease. Some patients may respond to alternative hormonal interventions despite the presence of castrate levels of testosterone. Furthermore, the application of chemotherapeutic regimens has provided viable treatment options for patients with HRPC.

Bone alkaline phosphatase serum level predicts the response to antiandrogen withdrawal

OBJECTIVE

To analyze if the biochemical response to antiandrogen withdrawal correlates with total and percent free serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) and bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A group of 46 patients in whom maximal androgen blockade (MAB) failed was included in this study. Flutamide was used in 32 patients and bicalutamide in 14. Total and free PSA and BAP were determined in serum the same day in which antiandrogen was withdrawn. Thereafter, serum PSA was determined every 15 days. A biochemical response was established when a decrease in serum PSA greater than 50% was observed. The duration of biochemical response was considered until the first of two consecutive PSA serum elevations.

RESULTS

The rate of biochemical responses was 23.9%. The mean duration of responses was 5.2 months. The mean serum PSA in patients who responded to the antiandrogen withdrawal was 86.4 ng/ml, while it was 98.6 ng/ml in those who did not respond, P > 0.05. The mean of percent free PSA was 13.9 and 17.7%, respectively, P > 0.05. However, the mean BAP in responder patients was significantly lower, 18.9 ng/ml versus 100.6 ng/ml, P < 0.03. The rate of responses to flutamide withdrawal was 25% and to bicalutamide withdrawal 21.4%, P > 0.05. Other factors as age, Gleason score, initial clinical stage and the period of antiandrogen exposure were also analyzed. However, none of them had statistical significance. Serum BAP was the only predictor of response in the logistic regression analysis and a cut-off point of 50 ng/ml provided a relative risk of 1.46 (95% CI 1.17-1.83).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower serum levels of BAP seems to correlate with a better response to antiandrogen withdrawal. Moreover, a level of BAP higher than 50 ng/ml would predict strongly the absence of response.

Secondary hormonal manipulation of prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer mortality among men in Western countries. The initial treatment of advanced prostate cancer is suppression of testicular androgen production by medical or surgical castration, but nearly all men with metastases develop disease progression. Patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC) have a median survival of approximately 18 months, and no therapy has yet demonstrated a definitive survival advantage. However, in the past several years, a number of promising new treatment strategies have emerged. One of the most important new treatment strategies involves secondary hormonal manipulation after the failure of primary androgen deprivation. This approach is predicated on the recognition that HRPC is a heterogeneous disease, and some patients may respond to alternative hormonal interventions despite the presence of castrate levels of testosterone.

Antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome associated with prostate cancer therapies: incidence and clinical significance

The antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome is a well established phenomenon in prostate cancer. It is widely accepted that a subset of patients will benefit from the withdrawal of antiandrogen or steroidal hormone from hormonal therapy, exhibiting decreasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values and clinical improvement. The pathophysiology of antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome is not completely understood, although androgen receptor gene mutations seem to be the likely explanation. Currently, it is not possible to identify the subset of patients whose tumours will respond to antiandrogen or steroid withdrawal. Tumours that will respond may be classified as androgen-independent and hormone-sensitive tumours as opposed to androgen-independent and hormone-insensitive tumours that do not respond. Patients who respond to antiandrogen withdrawal experience approximately 6 months with improved quality of life; however, it is unknown if this translates into prolonged survival. At the very least, antiandrogen withdrawal offers a therapeutic modality that is not associated with adverse effects and improves quality of life even if only for a very limited time. Recent reports suggest that adding a secondary hormonal therapy such as amino- glutethimide, ketoconazole or steroidal hormones may enhance the response rate and prolong response time to the antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome. However, unless there is proof that this secondary hormonal manipulation prolongs survival, maintenance of quality of life is mandatory because of the possible adverse effects from these potent drugs. The fact that about 30% of patients will respond to antiandrogen or steroid withdrawal in hormone refractory prostate cancer must be taken into account in clinical trials of new cytotoxic agents which have been and will be conducted. Cessation of flutamide for at least 4 weeks and, in the case of bicalutamide, even 8 weeks, is mandatory before antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome can be excluded as the cause of decreasing PSA values. The antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome offers another piece of the puzzle of prostatic carcinoma, but at the same time it demonstrates how different advanced prostate cancer cells may react to therapeutic strategies and, therefore, hormone refractory prostate cancer remains a difficult challenge which must be solved in the future.

New treatment strategies in advanced prostate cancer

The treatment of advanced prostate cancer has evolved rapidly in the last 5 years. Therapeutic options for patients with advanced disease, once essentially limited to the use of androgen deprivation, have expanded to include a number of interventions, including secondary hormonal manipulations, chemotherapy, and a variety of investigational approaches. Novel therapeutic approaches in prostate cancer patients are likely to be undertaken in patients with disease that is at or below the limits of detection by current imaging technology, so novel methods will be essential to the successful evaluation and use of these agents.

Anti-androgens and other hormonal therapies for prostate cancer

Many men who show evidence of a progression of prostate cancer by rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or other symptoms are treated with anti-androgens. Anti-androgen withdrawal represents the first line of treatment after failure of hormonal manipulation. Flutamide is an approved anti-androgen that has been incorporated in many of the combined androgen blockade studies. Bicalutamide is also a nonsteroidal anti-androgen that offers the advantages of reduced dosage amounts and reduction in side effects. Additionally, there are a variety of therapeutic agents that can suppress adrenal secretion of androgens. The most promising of these agents include aminoglutethamide, ketoconazole, and corticosteroids, with an expected response rate of 10% to 15%. Studies have shown that some patients may respond to an anti-estrogen such as tamoxifen. There are a variety of therapeutic treatment options available for patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer. However, quality-of-life issues are becoming increasingly important and should be incorporated into clinical trial endpoints.

Future prospects in prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer has displayed an increase in incidence unparalleled by any other tumor in the last two decades, with a steady, more gradual increase in mortality rate. Current curative strategies are focused on the detection and treatment of early-stage (T1-2 N0 M0), clinically significant tumors.

METHODS

To this aim, refinement of surgical approaches, with appropriate adjuvant therapies, will ensure more complete cancer control, while minimizing associated morbidity. New delivery systems for radiotherapy, as well as other energy sources, are evolving, while a number of promising pharmacological agents, including angiogenesis inhibitors and drugs which alter signal transduction pathways, are currently under investigation. Early detection is also being facilitated by a more widespread implementation of screening programs. Advances in tumor markers, and imaging and biopsy techniques, will allow more accurate preoperative staging. These, coupled with improvements in prognostic markers, aid the physician and patient alike in deciding on the suitability of treatment options with better estimation of outcome. Perhaps the most exciting developments in prostate cancer will come from knowledge of the molecular mechanisms underlying carcinogenesis. The potential for the development of diagnostic and therapeutic tools is immense. The efficacy of treatment can be studied at a molecular level, and strategies for preventing or slowing the development of malignancy can be formulated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Application of this knowledge in the form of gene and cellular therapy and in the development of novel systemic agents is beginning to enter the realm of clinical practice, and it may be in this field that means for cure and prevention of prostate cancer will eventually be found.

Hormone-refractory prostate cancer? Anti-androgen withdrawal and intermittent hormone therapy

OBJECTIVE

To separate hormone-dependent from hormonally relapsed prostate cancers, a D3 category has been proposed. The term has become synonymous with a hormone-refractory state with the implication that any further hormonal treatment would not be beneficial. In this review we examine some data on androgen receptor expression, anti-androgen withdrawal syndrome and intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) in patients with advanced prostate cancer.

MATERIALS

The literature on the mechanism of the withdrawal phenomenon in patients with prostate cancer submitted to hormone therapy was reviewed. Experimental and clinical data are reported.

RESULTS

The progression of prostate cancer in patients treated with combined androgen blockade (CAB) is associated with the activation of previously androgen-repressed genes, some of which may code for autocrine and paracrine growth factors that substitute for androgens in maintaining the viability of the tumorigenic stem cells. If androgens are replaced before progression begins, the surviving stem cells should give rise to an androgen-dependent tumor, which would be amenable to retreatment by CAB. This theory provides the rationale for intermittent androgen deprivation. We suggest that IAD could be more effective in patients with initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression after radical prostatectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Response to withdrawal therapies or second-line treatments is an example of a "hormonal" therapy that may benefit a proportion of patients with hormone-refractory disease, suggesting that the tumor is still androgen-dependent. Whether IAD enhances progression-free survival or overall survival must be verified in randomized clinical trials. Until further studies have been completed, the therapeutic concept of IAD should be treated as experimental.

Secondary hormonal manipulations in hormone refractory prostate cancer

Hormone refractory prostate cancer is clinically heterogeneous, and many patients retain sensitivity to subsequent hormonal manipulations, even after combined androgen blockage. Antiandrogen withdrawal is a mandatory first step. Subsequent treatment with an alternate antiandrogen, adrenal androgen inhibitor (such as ketoconazole), or glucocorticoid may provide both subjective and objective clinical benefit in up to 65% of patients.

Flutamide withdrawal plus hydrocortisone resulted in clinical complete response in a patient with prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Combined androgen blockade (CAB) (medical or surgical castration plus antiandrogen therapy) is considered by many to be the optimal endocrine maneuver for patients with metastatic prostate carcinoma. When progression occurs after CAB, the discontinuation of the antiandrogen is recommended. The authors present a patient that had a clinical complete response to flutamide withdrawal plus hydrocortisone that, at last follow-up, had been maintained for more than 46 months.

METHODS

A 71-year-old man with a positive family history of prostate carcinoma presented in 1989 with urinary frequency and a suspicious digital rectal examination. He was found to have a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (Gleason 4+4). He was started on CAB and his prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentration declined from 96 ng/mL to the normal range and was maintained for the next 24 months. In 1991 his PSA began to rise, and reached 64 ng/mL by 1993. The patient was enrolled on a clinical trial that discontinued the flutamide administration and hydrocortisone was initiated.

RESULTS

Physical examination at the time of enrollment was unremarkable. His PSA declined to below the limits of detection after this maneuver and at last follow-up had been maintained there for more than 46 months. In 1995, the patient underwent a repeat biopsy of the prostate and all six tissue cores were negative for carcinoma. At last follow-up in December 1996, the patient had no evidence of disease and was being followed routinely; however, the authors were continuing treatment with testicular suppression (leuprolide) plus hydrocortisone.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors believe the residual androgens and steroids produced by the adrenal cortex play a meaningful role in prostate carcinoma cell proliferation. Based on this case and data from trials supporting the activity of flutamide withdrawal plus adrenal suppression, it appears reasonable to evaluate prospectively the discontinuation of antiandrogen versus antiandrogen withdrawal plus adrenal suppression in individuals failing CAB.

Steroid hormone withdrawal syndromes. Pathophysiology and clinical significance

The steroid withdrawal syndrome has brought a new dimension to the treatment of advanced prostate cancer not only in the way we treat androgen-independent disease but also in terms of insights into the development of hormonal resistance. The data now confirm that 30% of cases have a meaningful subjective, biochemical, and objective response to the withdrawal of a steroid hormone as the first maneuver after primary hormonal therapy failure. Larger studies are needed to define further the withdrawal effect related to the other steroid hormone family members and to determine the objective response proportions. Although controversy surrounds the cause of the steroid withdrawal phenomenon, studies suggest that the androgen receptor plays a pivotal role. Molecular studies of the androgen receptors involving larger number of patients are paramount if we are going to develop a better understanding of the evolution of the withdrawal effect and hormone resistance.

The "syncytial tissue triad": a model for understanding how gap junctions participate in the local control of penile erection

Recent findings from both clinical and experimental studies document the importance of syncytial relaxation and contraction of corporal smooth muscle to penile erection and detumescence, respectively. However, the mechanism(s) permitting coordinated response generation among the vast array of largely inexcitable corporal smooth muscle cells is unclear. In this report the compelling evidence for a major role of intercellular communication through gap junctions to erectile function is reviewed. Moreover, a novel concept is advanced to explain more fully the putative mechanistic basis for integrative erectile tissue biology. Specifically, the presence of gap junctions, in concert with the autonomic nervous system and myogenic intracellular signal transduction mechanisms, is postulated to form a "syncytial tissue triad" that is largely responsible for the local modulation of corporal smooth muscle tone. It is reasonable to assume that the existence of this "syncytial tissue triad" confers a plasticity, adaptability, and flexibility to erectile function that may well account for the observed diversity of mechanisms known to regulate penile erection as well as the multifaceted etiology of erectile dysfunction.

The antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome

In 1989 the unanticipated agonist effect of antiandrogens on LNCaP prostate cancer cells was detected. A "flutamide withdrawal syndrome" was first described by Kelly and Scher [15], who reported a decrease in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after the removal of flutamide from the treatment regimen. In the last few years the paradoxical response to antiandrogens has also been reported for bicalutamide, chlormadinone acetate and others. Therefore the name of the syndrome has changed to "antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome." Several reasons such as mutations in the androgen receptor or a direct stimulatory effect of the antiandrogen for this effect have been discussed, but the exact molecular mechanism remains unclear. However, in patients with hormonally relapsed prostate cancer, a trial of "withdrawal therapy" is required prior to the initiation of toxic therapies.

Gap junctions in vascular tissues. Evaluating the role of intercellular communication in the modulation of vasomotor tone

Integration and coordination of responses among vascular wall cells are critical to the local modulation of vasomotor tone and to the maintenance of circulatory homeostasis. This article reviews the vast literature concerning the principles that govern the initiation and propagation of vasoactive stimuli among vascular smooth muscle cells, which are nominally the final effectors of vasomotor tone. In light of the abundance of new information concerning the distribution and function of gap junctions between vascular wall cells throughout the vascular tree, particular attention is paid to this integral aspect of vascular physiology. Evidence is provided for the important contribution of intercellular communication to vascular function at all levels of the circulation, from the largest elastic artery to the terminal arterioles. The thesis of this review is that the presence of gap junctions, in concert with the autonomic nervous system, pacemaker cells, myogenic mechanisms, and/or electrotonic current spread (both hyperpolarizing and depolarizing waves through gap junctions), confers a plasticity, adaptability, and flexibility to vasculature that may well account for the observed diversity in regulation and function of vascular tissues throughout the vascular tree. It is hoped that the summary information provided here will serve as a launching pad for a new discourse on the mechanistic basis of the integrative regulation and function of vasculature, which painstakingly accounts for the undoubtedly complex and manifold role of gap junctions in vascular physiology/dysfunction.