OPTIMAL COMBINATIONS OF SYSTEMATIC SEXTANT AND LATERALLY DIRECTED BIOPSIES FOR THE DETECTION OF PROSTATE CANCER

Likelihood of sampling prostate cancer at systematic biopsy as a function of gland volume and number of cores

BACKGROUND

Pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate is used to conduct targeted prostate biopsy (TB), guided by ultrasound and registered (fused) to the MRI. Systematic biopsy (SB) continues to be used together with TB or in mpMRI-negative patients. There is insufficient evidence on how to use SB to inform clinical decision-making in the mpMRI era. The purpose of this study was to estimate the effect of prostate volume and number of SB cores on sampling clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) using a simulation method based on clinical data.

METHODS

SBs were simulated using data from 42 patients enrolled in a transrectal ultrasound robot-assisted biopsy trial. Linear mixed models were used to examine the relationship between the number of SB cores and prostate volume on 1) clinically significant cancer detection probability (csCDP) and 2) percent of mpMRI depicted regions of interest (ROIs) sampled with the SB.

RESULTS

Median values and interquartile range (IQR) were 47.16 cm3 (35.61-65.57) for prostate volume, 0.57 cm3 (0.39-0.83) for ROI volume, and 4.0 (2-4) for PI-RADS v2.1 scores on MRI. csCDP increased with the increasing number of simulated SB cores and decreased substantially with larger prostate volume. Similarly, the percent of ROIs sampled increased with the increasing number of simulated SB cores and was lower for prostate volumes ≥60 cm3 compared to glands <60 cm3.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of the number of SBs performed on detecting csPCa varies largely with gland volume. The common 12-core SB can achieve adequate cancer detection and sampling of ROIs in smaller glands, but not in larger glands. In addition to TB or in mpMRI-negative patients, the number of SB cores can be adjusted to prostate volume. Performing 12-core SB alone in ≥60 cm3 glands results in inadequate sampling and potential PCa underdiagnosis.

A cost-effective transperineal prostate biopsy method utilizes the original transrectal setting

PURPOSE

Transperineal prostate biopsy (TPB) offers an alternative to transrectal prostate biopsy (TRB) for prostate cancer diagnosis. However, TPB may result in additional disposable and capital equipment costs, which can limit implementation within urology practice. Herein, we report the initial experience of a novel TPB technique within a tertiary referral center in Taiwan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of all men undergoing prostate biopsy January to October in 2021 was performed. Both biopsy techniques were performed with the same setting using the convex-convex array ultrasound probe under local anesthesia alone or with the addition of sedation using double free-hand technique. Complications within 30 days and cancer detection rate (CDR) were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 118 biopsies were included for final analysis. Eleven patients received systematic biopsy with additional MRI-targeted biopsy (TB) cores with all performed via a transperineal approach. The TPB group (n = 47) and TRB group (n = 58) had similar CDR after excluding TB cores (46.8% vs. 44.8%, p = 0.675). General complication rates for TPB were significantly lower than in the TRB group (27.7% vs. 46.6%, p = 0.047). No patients undergoing TPB had infectious complications, where five episodes were recorded in the TRB group (p = 0.114).

CONCLUSIONS

TPB performed with convex-convex ultrasound probe and double free-hand technique is safe, feasible, cost-effective, and demonstrates equivalent CDR to TRB. Its use may eliminate infectious hospitalizations while minimizing the need for additional capital in the adoption of TPB.

Efficacy and safety of the new biopsy strategy combining 6-core systematic and 3-core MRI-targeted biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Recent EAU guideline strongly recommended combined targeted biopsy (TBx) with systematic biopsy (SBx) for biopsy naïve patients with suspected multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) lesions; However, the clinical goal is to find out how to determine the optimal SBx and TBx cores for biopsy in order to maximize the detection of csPCa and minimize the associated defects. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of the new biopsy strategy combining 6-core systematic and 3-core MRI- TBx compared to 12-core systematic and 3-core MRI-TBx strategy.

Methods

This is a single-center, prospectively randomized controlled clinical trial. 280 men meeting inclusion criteria will be recruited and will be randomly allocated to either 6-core systematic plus 3-core MRI-TBx group (Group A) or 12-core systematic plus 3-core MRI-TBx group (Group B). The primary outcome compares the detection rate of PCa and clinically significant prostate cancer(csPCa) between group A and group B. The secondary outcomes compare the participant-reported pain score immediate post biopsy using pain measurement scale; proportion of men with post-biopsy complications and adverse events (Time frame: 7 days post biopsy, 30 days post biopsy); proportion of the men who undergo radical prostatectomy and have cancer upgraded histopathology from the biopsy to the radical prostatectomy.

Results and Discussion

A new biopsy strategy should be developed with the goal of minimizing procedure invasion, our study will provide the results of efficacy and safety of the new biopsy strategy (6-core systematic and 3-core MRI-TBx) in biopsy naïve men with suspicious mpMRI lesion in comparison with 12-core systematic and 3-core MRI-TBx.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2200056437; http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=151413&htm=4.

Prebiopsy bpMRI and hematological parameter-based risk scoring model for predicting outcomes in biopsy-naive men with PSA 4-20 ng/mL

Excessive prostate biopsy is a common problem for clinicians. Although some hematological and bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) parameters might help increase the rate of positive prostate biopsies, there is a lack of studies on whether their combination can further improve clinical detection efficiency. We retrospectively enrolled 394 patients with PSA levels of 4-20 ng/mL who underwent prebiopsy bpMRI during 2010-2021. Based on bpMRI and hematological indicators, six models and a nomogram were constructed to predict the outcomes of biopsy. Furthermore, we constructed and evaluated a risk scoring model based on the nomogram. Age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density (PSAD), systemic immune-inflammation index, cystatin C level, and the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2.1 score were significant predictors of prostate cancer (PCa) on multivariable logistic regression analyses (P < 0.05) and the five parameters were used to construct the XYFY nomogram. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of the nomogram was 0.916. Based on the nomogram, a risk scoring model (XYFY risk model) was constructed and then we divided the patients into low-(XYFY score: < 95), medium-(XYFY score: 95-150), and, high-risk (XYFY score: > 150) groups. The predictive values for diagnosis of PCa and clinically-significant PCa among the three risk groups were 3.0%(6/201), 41.8%(51/122), 91.5%(65/71); 0.5%(1/201), 19.7%(24/122), 60.6%(43/71), respectively. In conclusion, in this study, we used hematological and bpMRI parameters to establish and internally validate a XYFY risk scoring model for predicting the biopsy outcomes for patients with PSA levels of 4-20 ng/mL and this risk model would support clinical decision-making and reduce excessive biopsies.

Follow-up of men with a PI-RADS 4/5 lesion after negative MRI/Ultrasound fusion biopsy

Magnetic resonance imaging/Ultrasound (MRI/US) fusion targeted biopsy (TB) in combination with a systematic biopsy (SB) improves cancer detection but limited data is available how to manage patients with a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥ 4 lesion and a negative biopsy. We evaluate the real-world management and the rate of clinically significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa) during follow-up. 1546 patients with a multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) and a PI-RADS ≥ 3 who underwent SB and TB between January 2012 and May 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. 222 men with a PI-RADS ≥ 4 and a negative biopsy were included until 2019. For 177/222 (80%) complete follow-up data was obtained. 66/84 (78%) had an initial PI-RADS 4 and 18 (22%) a PI-RADS 5 lesion. 48% (84/177) received a repeat mpMRI; in the follow-up mpMRI, 39/84 (46%) lesions were downgraded to PI-RADS 2 and 11 (13%) to PI-RADS 3; three cases were upgraded and 28 lesions remained consistent. 18% (32/177) men underwent repeated TB and csPCa was detected in 44% (14/32). Our study presents real world data on the management of men with a negative TB biopsy. Men with a positive mpMRI and lesions with high suspicion (PI-RADS4/5) and a negative targeted biopsy should be critically reviewed and considered for repeat biopsy or strict surveillance. The optimal clinical risk assessment remains to be further evaluated.

Attitude is everything: keep probe pitch neutral during side-fire prostate biopsy. A simulator study

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate on a simulator a learnable technique to decrease deviation of biopsied cores from the template schema during freehand, side-fire systematic prostate biopsy (sPBx) with the goal of reducing prostate biopsy (PBx) false-negatives, thereby facilitating earlier sampling, diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant prostate cancer.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

Using a PBx simulator with real-time three-dimensional visualization, we devised a freehand, pitch-neutral (0°, horizontal plane), side-fire, transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided sPBx technique in the left lateral decubitus position. Thirty-four trainees on four Canadian and US urology programmes learned the technique on the same simulator, which recorded deviation from the intended template location in a double-sextant template as well as the TRUS probe pitch at the time of sampling. We defined deviation as the shortest distance in millimeters between a core centre and its intended template location, template deviation as the mean of all deviations in a template, and mastery as achieving a template deviation ≤5.0 mm.

RESULTS

All results are reported as mean ± sd. The mean absolute pitch and template deviation before learning the technique (baseline) were 8.2 ± 4.1° and 8.0 ± 2.7 mm, respectively, and after mastering the technique decreased to 4.5 ± 2.7° (P = 0.001) and 4.5 ± 0.6 mm (P < 0.001). Template deviation was related to mean absolute pitch (P < 0.001) and increased by 0.5 mm on average with each 1° increase in mean absolute pitch. Participants achieved mastery after practising 3.9 ± 2.9 double-sextant sets. There was no difference in time to perform a double-sextant set at baseline (277 ± 102 s) and mastery (283 ± 101 s; P = 0.39).

CONCLUSION

A pitch-neutral side-fire technique reduced template deviation during simulated freehand TRUS-guided sPBx, suggesting it may also reduce PBx false-negatives in patients in a future clinical trial. This pitch-neutral technique can be taught and learned; the University of Florida has been teaching it to all Urology residents for the last 2 years.

Value of extra-target prostate biopsy for the detection of magnetic resonance imaging-missed adverse pathology according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores: Spatial analysis using magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion images

OBJECTIVES

To clarify who benefits from extra-target sampling of systematic prostate biopsy to detect magnetic resonance imaging-missed significant cancer and upgrading, when concurrently carried out with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy.

METHODS

Targeted biopsy and systematic biopsy were carried out in 301 men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores ≥3. All score ≥3 regions were designated as targets. According to patients' highest Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores, spatial relations between targets and biopsy-proven cancer were investigated to identify magnetic resonance imaging-missed pathology.

RESULTS

Overall, targeted biopsy and systematic biopsy detected significant cancer in 56.5% and 46.5%, respectively (P < 0.001). Significant cancer was detected only by systematic biopsy in 7.0%, and only outside targets in 5.0%. Upgrading by systematic biopsy was observed in 16.3%, and occurred outside targets in 11.0%. On multivariate analysis, the highest Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 was predictive for significant cancer only outside targets (odds ratio 5.81, P = 0.002) and for upgrading derived from outside targets (odds ratio 2.64, P = 0.012). According to the scores of 3, 4 and 5, significant cancer was identified only outside targets in 1.0%, 11.2% and 2.9%, respectively (P = 0.003 for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 vs 4; P = 0.019 for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 vs 5), and upgrading occurred in 6.1%, 18.4% and 8.6%, respectively (P = 0.009 and 0.040).

CONCLUSIONS

Men with the highest Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score 4 receive the largest benefit from extra-target biopsy for magnetic resonance imaging-missed significant cancer detection and upgrading. In men with a score of 3, less adverse pathology is missed without extra-target biopsy. These findings suggest prostate biopsy strategy could be tailored according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores.

How Many Cores Does Systematic Prostate Biopsy Need?: A Large-Sample Retrospective Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To explore the best individualized systematic prostate biopsy method.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 1211 patients who underwent 12-core systematic prostate biopsy guided by transrectal ultrasound from January 2011 to March 2018. Other biopsy core methods (6-, 8-, and 10-core) were estimated from the 12-core biopsy that was performed. Differences in the detection rates of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 498 cases of PCa (41.1%) were detected, and 423 cases (34.9%) were csPCa. There was no significant difference between the 12- and 10-core prostate biopsy strategies in the total detection rates of PCa and csPCa (P > .05). In the subgroup of patients with a maximal prostate cross-sectional area of less than 15 cm² , there was a significant difference between the 12-core method and the standard 6-core method (P = .03) but no significant differences between the other methods in the detection rate of PCa (P > .05), but in the detection rate of csPCa, the 12-core method differed significantly from the other methods (P = .02-.04) except for the 10-core method (P > .05). In patients with a prostate-specific antigen concentration of 20 ng/mL or higher, there were no significant differences between the 12-core method and all of the other methods (P > 0.05). In patients younger than 70 years and 70 years or older, the 12-core method differed significantly from the other methods (P < .01-.03) except for the 10-core method (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Ten- or 12-core biopsy showed a higher detection rate than the other schemes. However, for patients with a prostate-specific antigen concentration of 20 ng/mL or higher, the 6-core systematic biopsy is preferred.

Free-hand transperineal prostate biopsy provides acceptable cancer detection and minimizes risk of infection: evolving experience with a 10-sector template

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Free-hand transperineal prostate (fTP-Bx) biopsy offers an alternative to transrectal prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Our objectives were to determine whether fTP-Bx achieves cancer detection rates comparable to historic TRUS-Bx cohorts; to determine infectious and other complications associated with fTP-B; and to propose a standardized fTP-Bx template.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We present a single institution, retrospective review of fTP-Bx in 1,000 men with elevated prostate-specific antigen, abnormal digital rectal examination, or on an active surveillance protocol. A fan-like biopsy scheme was used in 883 patients. A 10-sector prostate biopsy template was developed for use in the final 117 patients. The primary outcome was detection of any cancer and detection of clinically significant cancer (Grade Group ≥ 2). Secondary outcomes included procedural specifics and complications. Chi Square and Mann-Whitney U were used for analysis of categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

RESULTS

The median age of the cohort was 68 (interquartile range 61-74) years, and the median prostate-specific antigen was 7.9 (interquartile range 5.5-11.9) ng/ml. Total cancer (60.7%) and clinically significant cancer (40.3%) detection for fTP-Bx were comparable to those reported for TRUS-Bx. Detection of any cancer (70.9% vs. 59.3%, P < 0.01) and clinically significant cancer (51.3% vs. 38.9%, P = 0.01) was higher using the 10-sector biopsy template relative to the fan-like pattern. No patients were hospitalized for sepsis and no culture-proven urinary tract infections were diagnosed.

CONCLUSION

Cancer detection rates using fTP-Bx are comparable to TRUS-Bx, and fTP-Bx nearly eliminates the risk of infection. We propose a 10-sector biopsy template for fTP-Bx that easily translates to established MRI prostate sector maps for use in clinical care and future research studies exploring the efficacy of MRI-guided fTP-Bx.

Periprostatic fat tissue transcriptome reveals a signature diagnostic for high-risk prostate cancer

Evidence suggests that altered adipose tissue homeostasis may be an important contributor to the development and/or progression of prostate cancer. In this study, we investigated the adipose transcriptional profiles of low- and high-risk disease to determine both prognostic potential and possible biological drivers of aggressive disease. RNA was extracted from periprostatic adipose tissue from patients categorised as having prostate cancer with either a low or high risk of progression based on tumour characteristics at prostatectomy and profiled by RNA sequencing. The expression of selected genes was then quantified by qRT-PCR in a cross-validation cohort. In the first phase, a total of 677 differentially transcribed genes were identified, from which a subset of 14 genes was shortlisted. In the second phase, a 3 gene (IGHA1, OLFM4, RERGL) signature was refined and evaluated using recursive feature selection and cross-validation, obtaining a promising discriminatory utility (area under curve 0.72) at predicting the presence of high-risk disease. Genes implicated in immune and/or inflammatory responses predominated. Periprostatic adipose tissue from patients with high-risk prostate cancer has a distinct transcriptional signature that may be useful for detecting its occult presence. Differential expression appears to be driven by a local immune/inflammatory reaction to more advanced tumours, than any specific adipose tissue-specific tumour-promoting mechanism. This signature is transferable into a clinically usable PCR-based assay, which in a cross-validation cohort shows diagnostic potential.

Dutasteride for the prevention of prostate cancer in men with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: results of a phase III randomized open-label 3-year trial

PURPOSE

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is a potential precursor of prostate cancer (PCa), and patients with HGPIN are at high risk for PCa development. Objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of dutasteride 0.5 mg in PCa prevention among men with isolated HGPIN on biopsy.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, phase III, open-label 3-year trial assessed dutasteride versus active surveillance in patients with HGPIN. Patients were randomized to dutasteride 0.5 mg daily or active surveillance. Per-protocol prostate biopsies were performed at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months until cancer detection or study end. The primary end point was cancer-free survival (CFS). An intention-to-treat analysis was done for patients who underwent at least one per-protocol biopsy. An efficacy analysis was done for patients who completed the study. CFS was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 220 men were randomized (dutasteride, n = 107; surveillance, n = 113). PCa was detected in 47.6: 49.1 % in the surveillance group and 45.9 % in the treatment group (p = 0.66). The detected PCa differentiation by Gleason score (GS) was GS 6 in 76.9 %, GS 7 in 19.8 %, and GS ≥ 8 in 3.3 %, with no difference between groups. The 3-year PCa-free survival was 43.6 % in the surveillance and 49.6 % in the dutasteride group (log rank p = 0.57). Limitations include a relatively high non-adherence rate, open-label design, and baseline sextant biopsy scheme.

CONCLUSIONS

Dutasteride 0.5 mg for 3 years did not lower the PCa detection rate but did not worsen detected PCa characteristics in men with HGPIN.

Is visual registration equivalent to semiautomated registration in prostate biopsy?

In magnetic resonance iimaging- (MRI-) ultrasound (US) guided biopsy, suspicious lesions are identified on MRI, registered on US, and targeted during biopsy. The registration can be performed either by a human operator (visual registration) or by fusion software. Previous studies showed that software registration is fairly accurate in locating suspicious lesions and helps to improve the cancer detection rate. Here, the performance of visual registration was examined for ability to locate suspicious lesions defined on MRI. This study consists of 45 patients. Two operators with differing levels of experience (<1 and 18 years) performed visual registration. The overall spatial difference by the two operators in 72 measurements was 10.6 ± 6.0 mm. Each operator showed a spatial difference of 9.4 ± 5.1 mm (experienced; 39 lesions) and 12.1 ± 6.6 mm (inexperienced; 33 lesions), respectively. In a head-to-head comparison of the same 16 lesions from 12 patients, the spatial differences were 9.7 mm ± 4.9 mm (experienced) and 13.4 mm ± 7.4 mm (inexperienced). There were significant differences between the two operators (unpaired, P value = 0.042; paired, P value = 0.044). The substantial differences by the two operators suggest that visual registration could improperly and inaccurately target many tumors, thereby potentially leading to missed diagnosis or false characterization on pathology.

MRI-targeted biopsies versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies for the diagnosis of localized prostate cancer in biopsy naïve men

Introduction. To compare, in the same cohort of men, the detection of clinically significant disease in standard (STD) cores versus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) targeted (TAR) cores. Material and Methods. A prospective study was conducted on 129 biopsy naïve men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer. These patients underwent prebiopsy mpMRI with STD systematic biopsies and TAR biopsies when lesions were found. The agreement between the TAR and the STD protocols was measured using Cohen's kappa coefficient. Results. Cancer detection rate of MRI-targeted biopsy was 62.7%. TAR protocol demonstrated higher detection rate of clinically significant disease compared to STD protocol. The proportion of cores positive for clinically significant cancer in TAR cores was 28.9% versus 9.8% for STD cores (P < 0.001). The proportion of men with clinically significant cancer and the proportion of men with Gleason score 7 were higher with the TAR protocol than with the STD protocol (P = 0.003; P = 0.0008, resp.). Conclusion. mpMRI improved clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate compared to STD protocol alone with less tissue sampling and higher Gleason score. Further development in imaging as well as multicentre studies using the START recommendation is needed to elucidate the role of mpMRI targeted biopsy in the management of prostate cancer.

Transrectal doppler ultrasound during prostate biopsy: clinical utility and limitations

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical utility and limitations of guided prostate biopsy Power Doppler in patients with elevated serum PSA levels.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Prospective study. From April 2012 to May 2013, 111 men over 45 years of age with serum PSA level greater than 4.0ng/dl who underwent a transrectal prostate biopsy were included. The hypoechoic nodules in the peripheral region were considered positive on the gray scale. Subsequently, the study was conducted with the Power Doppler, where the vascularization of suspicious images was analyzed for sampling. In addition, samples were taken from the suspected areas when performing the digital rectal examination. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the three tests (digital rectal examination, standard gray scale ultrasound and power Doppler).

RESULTS

Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 48 of the 111 patients (43%). Fifty-nine cases (53%) were defined as positive with the Power Doppler. Of these, 39 (66%) corresponded to a diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma. The Power Doppler was positive in 39 cases of the 48 patients diagnosed with cancer and the gray scale ultrasound was positive in 31 cases. Overall sensitivity of the power Doppler was 81%, specificity 68%, PPV 66% and NPV 82%, which was higher compared to the other methods (P<.05).

CONCLUSION

Currently, prostate biopsy using Power Doppler does not seem to identify prostate cancer with sufficient accuracy to omit the guided systematic biopsy gray scale, the combined use of these methods being preferable.

Standards for prostate biopsy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A variety of techniques have emerged for the optimization of prostate biopsy. In this review, we summarize and critically discuss the most recent developments regarding the optimal systematic biopsy and sampling labeling along with multiparametric MRI and magnetic resonance-targeted biopsies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The use of 10-12-core-extended sampling protocols increases cancer detection rates compared with traditional sextant sampling and reduces the likelihood that patients will require a repeat biopsy, ultimately allowing more accurate risk stratification without increasing the likelihood of detecting insignificant cancers. As the number of cores increases above 12 cores, the increase in diagnostic yield becomes marginal. However, the limitations of this technique include undersampling, oversampling, and the need for repetitive biopsy. MRI and magnetic resonance-targeted biopsies have demonstrated superiority over systematic biopsies for the detection of clinically significant disease and representation of disease burden, while deploying fewer cores and may have applications in men undergoing initial or repeat biopsy and those with low-risk cancer on or considering active surveillance.

SUMMARY

A 12-core systematic biopsy that incorporates apical and far-lateral cores in the template distribution allows maximal cancer detection, avoidance of a repeat biopsy while minimizing the detection of insignificant prostate cancers. MRI-guided prostate biopsy has an evolving role in both initial and repeat prostate biopsy strategies, as well as active surveillance, potentially improving sampling efficiency, increasing the detection of clinically significant cancers, and reducing the detection of insignificant cancers.

Low risk patients benefit from extreme anterior apical sampling on initial biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis

BACKGROUND

To assess the effect of additional extreme apical sampling on prostate cancer (PCa) detection and aggressiveness in patients with standard risk versus high risk of a positive biopsy.

METHODS

Three thousand fifty three men were reviewed from our institution review board approved prostate biopsy database. Two thousand five hundred and twenty one underwent biopsy with 12 cores while 532 underwent 14 core sampling (2 extra cores from the extreme anterior apex). Patients were stratified into one of two risk groups: (1) standard risk of PCa (elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) < 10 ng/ml, normal digital rectal exam (DRE), and no lesions on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)), and (2) higher risk of PCa (PSA > 10 ng/ml and/or abnormal DRE and/or lesion on TRUS). Prostate cancer detection and disease characteristics were compared between the biopsy schemes stratified by risk of a positive biopsy.

RESULTS

PCa detection with 14 core sampling was more likely in all patients (OR 1.339, 95% CL 1.070-1.676) and in men with standard risk (OR 1.334, 95% CL 1.007-1.769). A greater median number of positive cores (3 vs. 2) and a higher maximum cancer % per core (40% vs. 25%) were seen in the 14 core cohort when stratified to standard risk. Gleason ≥7 was more likely detected with 14 cores in the standard risk group (55.6% vs. 45.2%). Differences in PCa detection and Gleason ≥7 between biopsy techniques were not noted in the higher risk group.

CONCLUSION

Extreme apical sampling increases aggressive cancer detection on initial biopsy, especially in patients with standard risk of PCa.

Random biopsy: when, how many and where to take the cores?

PURPOSE

The optimal random prostate biopsy scheme (PBx) in the initial and repeated setting is still an issue of controversy. We performed an analysis of the recent literature about the prostate biopsy techniques.

METHODS

We performed a clinical and critical literature review by searching MEDLINE database from January 2005 up to January 2014. Electronic searches were limited to the English language, and the keywords prostate cancer, prostate biopsy, transrectal ultrasound, transperineal prostate biopsy were used.

RESULTS

Prostate biopsy strategy in initial setting. According to the literature and the major international guidelines, the recommended approach in initial setting is still the extended scheme (EPBx) (12 cores). However, there is now a growing evidence in the literature that (a) saturation PBx (>20 cores) (SPBx) might be indicated in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml or low PSA density or large prostate and (b) an individualized approach with more than 12 cores according to the clinical characteristics of the patients may optimize cancer detection in the single patient. Moreover, in the era of multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI), EPBx or SPBX may be substituted by mpMRI-targeted biopsies that have demonstrated superiority over systematic random biopsies for the detection of clinically significant disease and representation of disease burden, while deploying fewer cores. Prostate biopsy strategy in repeat setting. How and how many cores should be taken in the different scenarios in the repeated setting is still unclear. SPBx clearly improves cancer detection if clinical suspicion persists after previous biopsy with negative findings and is able to provide an accurate prediction of prostate tumour volume and grade. Nevertheless, international guidelines do not strongly recommended SPBx in all situations of repeated setting. In the active surveillance and in focal therapy protocols, the optimal schemes have to be defined.

CONCLUSIONS

The course of PBx has changed significantly from sextant biopsies to systematic and from extended to SPBx schemes. The issue about the number and location of the cores is still a matter of debate both in initial and in repeat setting. At present, EPBx is sufficient in most of the cases to provide adequate diagnosis and prostate cancer characterization in the initial setting, while SPBx seems to be necessary in repeat setting. The PBx schemes are evolving also because the scenario in which a PBx is necessary is changing. Random prostate PBx do not represent the future, while imaging target biopsy are becoming more popular.

Cancer detection rates of different prostate biopsy regimens in patients with renal failure

We aimed to evaluate the cancer detection rates of 6-, 10-, 12-core biopsy regimens and the optimal biopsy protocol for prostate cancer diagnosis in patients with renal failure. A total of 122 consecutive patients with renal failure underwent biopsy with age-specific prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels up to 20 ng/mL. The 12-core biopsy technique (sextant biopsy + lateral base, lateral mid-zone, lateral apex, bilaterally) performed to all patients. Pathology results were examined separately for each sextant, 10-core that exclude parasagittal mid-zones from 12-cores (10a), 10-core that exclude apex zones from 12-cores (10b) and 12-core biopsy regimens. Of 122 patients, 37 (30.3%) were positive for prostate cancer. The cancer detection rates for sextant, 10a, 10b and 12 cores were 17.2%, 29%, 23.7% and 30.7%, respectively. Biopsy techniques of 10a, 10b and 12 cores increased the cancer detection rates by 40%, 27.5% and 43.2% among the sextant technique, respectively. Biopsy techniques of 10a and 12 cores increased the cancer detection rates by 17.1% and 21.6% among 10b biopsy technique, respectively. There were no statistical differences between 12 core and 10a core about cancer detection rate. Adding lateral cores to sextant biopsy improves the cancer detection rates. In our study, 12-core biopsy technique increases the cancer detection rate by 5.4% among 10a core but that was not statistically different. On the other hand, 12-core biopsy technique includes all biopsy regimens. We therefore suggest 12-core biopsy or minimum 10-core strategy incorporating six peripheral biopsies with elevated age- specific PSA levels up to 20 ng/mL in patients with renal failure.

Transperineal ultrasound-guided 12-core prostate biopsy: an extended approach to diagnose transition zone prostate tumors

Objective

Transperineal ultrasound-guided (TPUS) 12-core prostate biopsy was evaluated as an initial strategy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer, The distribution of prostate cancer lesions was assessed with zone-specific biopsy.

Methods

From January 2010 to December 2012, 287 patients underwent TPUS-guided 12-core prostate biopsy. Multiple cores were obtained from both the peripheral zone (PZ) and the transition zone (TZ) of the prostate. Participants' clinical data and the diagnostic yield of the cores were recorded and prospectively analyzed as a cross-sectional study.

Results

The diagnostic yield of the 12-core prostate biopsy was significantly higher compared to the 6-core scheme (42.16 vs. 21.6%). The diagnostic yield of the 10-core prostate biopsy was significantly higher compared to the 6-core scheme (37.6 vs. 21.6%). The 12-core scheme improved the diagnostic yield in prostates >50 ml (12-core scheme: 28.1% vs. 10-core scheme: 20.4%; p = 0.034).

Conclusions

The 12-core biopsy scheme is a safe and effective approach for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. TZ biopsies in patients with larger prostates should be included in the initial biopsy strategy.

Primary Zonal High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Prostate Cancer: Results of a Prospective Phase IIa Feasibility Study

OBJECTIVES

To present the results of a prospective phase IIa study assessing the role of primary zonal High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) for prostate cancer treatment.

METHODS

31 consecutive patients with unilateral organ confined prostate cancer primarily treated by zonal HIFU (from February 2007 to June 2011) were recruited into a single centre prospective phase IIa feasibility study. Complications were prospectively recorded and graded according to the Clavien-Dindo score. Postoperatively, patients were followed with serial serum PSA determinations and digital rectal examinations. An individual PSA nadir was identified in each patient. Followup also included whole gland biopsies performed in the event of a PSA rising>2.0 ng/mL above nadir value (Phoenix criteria).

RESULTS

At a median followup of 38 months, biochemical recurrence free survival was 100%, 89%, and 82.7% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, with overall and cancer specific survival of 100%. The procedure was safe and well tolerated with no major adverse events. All patients were continent at their last followup and 55.2% (16/29) had erectile function sufficient for penetration.

CONCLUSION

Primary zonal HIFU is a valid focal therapy strategy, safe and feasible in day to day practice with good promising results [corrected].

The role of an abnormal prostate-specific antigen level and an abnormal digital rectal examination in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: A cross-sectional study in Qatar

Objective

To investigate the role of an abnormal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and abnormal findings on a digital rectal examination (DRE) in the detection of prostate cancer in men in Qatar.

Patients and methods

Between June 2008 and September 2012, 651 patients had a transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy of the prostate (TRUSBP) at our centre. The indications for a biopsy were a high PSA level (>4 ng/mL), or an abnormal DRE result. Patients were assessed by a thorough history, clinical examination and routine laboratory investigations. Data, including age, DRE findings, TRUS findings, total PSA level, prostate volume and the pathology results, were evaluated.

Results

The mean (SD) age of the 651 patients was 64.1 (7.4) years. Prostate cancer was detected in 181 men (27.8%), benign prostatic hyperplasia in 275 (42.2%) and prostatitis in 236 (36.4%). The sensitivity and specificity for detecting prostate cancer were 93.9% and 8.5% for an abnormal PSA level (>4 ng/mL), 46.1% and 84.7% for abnormal DRE findings, and 95% and 30.2% for the two combined. Using a receiver operating characteristics curve, a PSA threshold of 7.9 ng/mL had a sensitivity of 56.6% and specificity of 52.8%. When a PSA threshold of 7.9 ng/mL was used in combination with abnormal DRE findings, the overall accuracy was 76.9%.

Conclusion

The PSA threshold level of 7.9 ng/mL, determined by this analysis, has a higher likelihood of detecting prostate cancer in men in Qatar. However, it failed to detect cancer in substantially many men with statistically significant disease.

3D versus 2D Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Higher Cancer Detection Rate in Clinical Practice

Objectives. To compare prostate cancer detection rates of extended 2D versus 3D biopsies and to further assess the clinical impact of this method in day-to-day practice. Methods. We analyzed the data of a cohort of 220 consecutive patients with no prior history of prostate cancer who underwent an initial prostate biopsy in daily practice due to an abnormal PSA and/or DRE using, respectively, the classical 2D and the new 3D systems. All the biopsies were done by a single experienced operator using the same standardized protocol. Results. There was no significant difference in terms of age, total PSA, or prostate volume between the two groups. However, cancer detection rate was significantly higher using the 3D versus the 2D system, 50% versus 34% (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference while comparing the 2 groups in term of nonsignificant cancer detection. Conclusion. There is reasonable evidence demonstrating the superiority of the 3D-guided biopsies in detecting prostate cancers that would have been missed using the 2D extended protocol.

Target detection: magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy

Recent advances in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have enabled image-guided detection of prostate cancer. Fusion of MRI with real-time ultrasound (US) allows the information from MRI to be used to direct biopsy needles under US guidance in an office-based procedure. Fusion can be performed either cognitively or electronically, using a fusion device. Fusion devices allow superimposition (coregistration) of stored MRI images on real-time US images; areas of suspicion found on MRI can then serve as targets during US-guided biopsy. Currently available fusion devices use a variety of technologies to perform coregistration: robotic tracking via a mechanical arm with built-in encoders (Artemis/Eigen, BioJet/Geoscan); electromagnetic tracking (UroNav/Philips-Invivo, Hi-RVS/Hitachi); or tracking with a 3D US probe (Urostation/Koelis). Targeted fusion biopsy has been shown to identify more clinically significant cancers and fewer insignificant cancers than conventional biopsy. Fusion biopsy appears to be a major advancement over conventional biopsy because it allows (1) direct targeting of suspicious areas not seen on US and (2) follow-up biopsy of specific cancerous sites in men undergoing active surveillance.

Outcomes and trends of prostate biopsy for prostate cancer in Chinese men from 2003 to 2011

Background

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening is growing in popularity in China, but its impact on biopsy characteristics and outcomes are poorly understood.

Objective

Our objective was to characterize prostate biopsy outcomes and trends in Chinese men over a 10-year period, since the increasing use of PSA tests.

Methods

All men (n = 1,650) who underwent prostate biopsy for PCa at Huashan Hospital, Shanghai, China from 2003–2011 were evaluated. Demographic and clinical information was collected for each patient, including age, digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal ultrasound (prostate volume and nodule), total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) levels and free PSA ratio (fPSA/tPSA) prior to biopsy. Prostate biopsy was performed using six cores before October 2007 or ten cores thereafter. Logistic regression and multivariate analysis were used to evaluate our data.

Results

The overall positive rate of prostate biopsy for PCa was 47% and the rate decreased significantly over the years from 74% in 2003 to 33% in 2011 (P-trend = 0.004) . Age at diagnosis was slightly increased (P-trend = 0.04) while fPSA/tPSA was significantly decreased (P-trend = 1.11×10-5). A statistically significant trend was not observed for tPSA levels, prostate volume, or proportion of positive nodule. The model including multiple demographic and clinical variables (i.e., age, DRE, tPSA, fPSA/tPSA and transrectal ultrasound results) (AUC = 0.93) statistically outperformed models that included only PSA (AUC = 0.85) or fPSA/tPSA (AUC = 0.66) to predict PCa risks (P<0.05). Similar results were observed in a subgroup of men whose tPSA levels were lower than 20 ng/mL (AUC = 0.87, vs. AUC of tPSA  = 0.62, P<0.05).

Conclusions

Detection rates of PCa and high-grade PCa among men that underwent prostate biopsy at the institution has decreased significantly in the past 10 years, likely due to increasing use of PSA tests. Predictive performance of demographic and clinical variables of PCa was excellent. These variables should be used in clinics to determine the need for prostate biopsy.

Optimal prostate biopsy regimen

The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era has increased the rates of prostate cancer detection and treatment, while reducing the risk of death from prostate cancer in the US. Image-guided prostate biopsy techniques have led to stage migration and the detection and treatment of lower risk prostate cancers. Improved techniques with laterally directed biopsy, office-based saturation biopsy, and transperineal biopsy under anesthesia have increased the detection rates of smaller volume tumors. Improved detection of ever-smaller tumors assists the clinician in determining what treatment is most appropriate for the patient, including the use of active surveillance and focal therapy. Furthermore, the detection of small volume, high grade cancers may widen the latency interval in which a clinically significant tumor may be detectable and curable.

Prostate saturation biopsy following a first negative biopsy: state of the art

INTRODUCTION

Saturation prostate biopsy (SPBx) has been initially introduced to improve prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate (DR) in the repeat setting. Nevertheless, the optimal number and the most appropriate location of the cores, together with the timing to perform a second PBx and the eventual modification of the PBx protocols according to the different clinical situations, are matters of debate. The aim of this review is to perform a critical analysis of the literature about the actual role of SPBx in the repeat setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature since 1995 up to 2011. Electronic searches were limited to the English language, using the MEDLINE database. The key words 'saturation prostate biopsy' and 'repeated prostate biopsy' were used.

RESULTS

SPBx improves PCa DR if clinical suspicion persists after previous biopsy with negative findings and provides an accurate prediction of prostate tumor volume and grade, even if the issue about the number and locations of the cores is still a matter of debate.

CONCLUSIONS

At present, SPBx seems to be really necessary in men with persistent suspicion of PCa after negative initial biopsy and probably in patients with a multifocal high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical small acinar proliferation. In the remaining situations, adopting an individualized scheme is preferable.

Role of prostate-specific antigen change ratio at initial biopsy as a novel decision-making marker for repeat prostate biopsy

Purpose

Prostate biopsy is used to confirm the prostate cancer. Although first biopsy result was benign, repeat biopsy is recommended for the patient who has higher risk of prostate cancer. In this study, we investigated the PSA change ratio (post-biopsy PSA to baseline PSA) whether it could be predictive factor of prostate cancer and helpful when decided to perform repeat biopsy.

Materials and Methods

151 patients, first diagnosed as benign, but underwent repeat biopsy due to clinical suspicion of prostate cancer were included. Post-biopsy PSA was checked 60 minutes later after biopsy. PSA change ratio was defined as post-biopsy PSA to baseline PSA. According to results of repeat biopsy, patients were divided into benign group (group A) and cancer groups (group B). Between two group baseline PSA, PSA density, post-biopsy PSA and PSA change ratio were compared, and most effective cut-off value was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC).

Results

129 men were benign, 22 men were prostate cancer according to results of repeat biopsy. Between two groups, post-biopsy PSA and PSA change ratio were statically significant differences. (p<0.001, <0.001) The effective cut-off value was 3.0, 3.5 and 4.0 according to ROC. At ROC curve, PSA change ratio was statistically significant for diagnosis of prostate cancer. (AUC 0.800, p<0.001).

Conclusions

PSA change ratio is thought be a predictive factor for prostate cancer. If the PSA change ratio was less than 3.0-4.0, repeat biopsy should be considered to confirm the diagnosis.

Are clinically insignificant prostate cancers really insignificant among Korean men?

PURPOSE

We aimed to determine whether 12 core-extended biopsies of the prostate could predict insignificant prostate cancer (IPCa) in Koreans reliably enough to recommend active surveillance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred and ninety-seven patients who underwent radical prostatectomy after 12 core-extended prostate biopsies were retrospectively reviewed. 38 cases (12.8%) were shown to be IPCa.

RESULTS

The average age was 65.2 years, serum PSA was 5.49 ng/dL, and the PSA density was 0.11. The Gleason scores (GS) were 6 (3+3) in 31, 5 (3+2) in 4, and 4 (2+2) in 3. After radical prostatectomy, higher GS was given in 16 (42.1%), whereas lower GS was given in 1 case (2.6%), as compared with the GS obtained from biopsy. 11 (28.9%) had GS of 7 (3+4) and 5 (13.2%) had GS of 7 (4+3). 6 in GS 7 (4+3) and 1 in GS 7 (3+4) showed prostate capsule invasion and 1 in GS 7 (4+3) had seminal vesicle invasion. Prostate capsule invasion was observed in 1 with GS 6 (3+3). The rate of inaccuracy of the contemporary Epstein criteria was 42.1%. Only PSA density was a reliable indicator of clinically IPCa (odds ratio=1.384, 95% CI, 1.103 to 2.091).

CONCLUSION

Diagnosis of IPCa from a prostate biopsy underestimated the true nature of prostate cancer in as many as 42.1% of Koreans.

Are men who undergo radical prostatectomy with lower urinary tract symptoms at an increased risk for aggressive prostate cancer?

Purpose

We aimed to determine whether prediagnostic lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are associated with the aggressiveness of nonmetastatic prostate cancer (PCa) and compared the clinicopathologic features of PCa patients with and without preexisting LUTS.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 295 prostate cancer patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy (RP) by a single surgeon from 2006 to 2010. A total of 205 patients were assigned to two groups according to whether they showed preoperative LUTS (International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS]≥8). Clinical, operative, pathologic, and postoperative functional data were collected.

Results

The mean age at RP was 62.7 years in the no LUTS group (group A, n=108) and 64.7 in the LUTS group (group B, n=97). The baseline mean IPSS score was 6.1 in group A and 14.6 in group B (p=0.029). The incidence of pathologic T3a stage or above was significantly higher in group B than in group A (p=0.036). The mean postoperative follow-up period was 16.8 months (range, 4 to 38 months). The mean time to biochemical recurrence was 16.9 and 18.2 months in groups A and B, respectively (p=0.148). The median time to recovery of urinary incontinence was 3.6 and 3.3 months in groups A and B, respectively.

Conclusions

PCa patients without baseline LUTS had a favorable result of pathologic T stage even though there were no significant differences in biochemical recurrence or recovery of postoperative incontinence compared with patients with baseline LUTS.

A proposed new technique in prostate cancer tissue bio-banking: our experience with a new protocol

The aim of our study, beyond validating a method of collecting and storing biological samples from patients with prostate cancer, was to validate an innovative biopsy method for the creation of a biobank of prostatic frozen tissues. Patients referred to our hospital between November 2008 and March 2010 to undergo radical prostatectomy were invited to participate in the study. Each patient's data were stored in two databases (personal information and clinical database) while samples of urine, blood and its derivatives, fresh material and formalin-processed tissue were stored in a correlated biobank. The proposed method for collecting fresh material was to take samples of the neoplastic tissue by carrying out targeted biopsies in the area indicated by the biopsy mapping as the site of the malignancy, under manual palpation to identify the neoplastic nodule. The site of sampling was marked by an injection of India ink. 55 patients agreed to participate in the study. In 43 cases biopsies were correct, with a mean of 48% of core involved by tumour (range, 10-90%). Overall the tumour detection rate was 78.2%. The protocol for collecting biological material and the new method for collecting fresh tissue reduce internal steps and staff involved, thereby reducing all those variables that cause heterogeneity of material and changes in its quality. This process provides high quality, low cost material for research on prostate cancer. The features of the collection protocol mean that the protocol can also be used in non-academic centres with only limited research funds.

The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review was performed to compare the efficacy and complications of transperineal (TP) vs. transrectal (TR) prostate biopsy. A systematic research of PUBMED, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify all clinical controlled trials on prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate and complications achieved by TP and TR biopsies. Prostate biopsies included sextant, extensive and saturation biopsy procedures. All patients were assigned to a TR group and a TP group. Subgroup analysis was performed according to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and digital rectal examination (DRE) findings. The Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.1 software was used for the meta-analysis. A total of seven trials, including three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and four case-control studies (CCS), met our inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in the cancer detection rate between the sextant TR and TP groups (risk difference (RD), -0.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.08-0.03; P=0.34). Meta-analysis for RCTs combined with CCS showed that there was no difference in the cancer detection rate between the extensive TR and TP group (RD, -0.01; 95% CI, -0.05-0.04; P=0.81). There was no significant difference in PCa detection rate between the saturation TR and TP approaches (31.4% vs. 25.7%, respectively; P=0.3). There were also no significant differences in cancer detection between the TR and TP groups in each subgroup. Although the data on complications were not pooled for the meta-analysis, no significant difference was found when comparing TR and TP studies. TR and TP biopsies were equivalent in terms of efficiency and related complications. TP prostate biopsy should be an available and alternative procedure for use by urologists.

State-of-the-art uroradiologic imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer

In the diagnostic process of prostate cancer, several radiologic imaging modalities significantly contribute to the detection and localization of the disease. These range from transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to positron emission tomography (PET). Within this review, after evaluation of the literature, we will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these imaging modalities in clarifying the patient's clinical status as to whether he has prostate cancer or not and if so, where it is located, so that therapy appropriate to the patient's disease may be administered. TRUS, specifically with the usage of intravenous contrast agents, provides an excellent way of directing biopsy towards suspicious areas within the prostate in the general (screening) population. MRI using functional imaging techniques allows for highly accurate detection and localization, particularly in patients with prior negative ultrasound guided biopsies. A promising new development is the performance of biopsy within the magnetic resonance scanner. Subsequently, a proposal for optimal use of radiologic imaging is presented and compared with the European and American urological guidelines on prostate cancer.

Extended sampling at first biopsy improves cancer detection rate: results of a prospective, randomized trial comparing 12 versus 18-core prostate biopsy

PURPOSE

We determined whether increasing the number of cores at first prostate biopsy would improve the cancer detection rate without increasing the detection of clinically insignificant tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2009 to January 2010 patients scheduled for prostate biopsy were randomized to 12 or 18-core sampling. Study inclusion criteria were 1) age 45 to 75 years, 2) abnormal digital rectal examination and/or prostate specific antigen 4 to 20 ng/ml, and 3) no previous biopsy. The primary end point was the cancer detection rate. Secondary end points were clinically insignificant cancer detection and morbidity.

RESULTS

A total of 150 patients were enrolled in the study. Preoperative variables were similar in the 2 groups of 75 patients each. Cancer was detected in 23 patients (30.7%) in group 1 and in 36 (48%) in group 2 (p = 0.02). More cases of insignificant cancer were detected in group 2 (p not significant). In men with prostate volume 65 cc or less the detection rate was 30.9% in group 1 and 52.8% in group 2 (p = 0.02). In men with prostate specific antigen 10 ng/ml or less the detection rate was 19.6% in group 1 and 38.4% in group 2 (p = 0.03). Two group 2 patients (5.5%) were diagnosed based on additional samples but the diagnosis corresponded to insignificant cancer. There was no statistically significant difference in morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

The 18-core protocol improves prostate cancer detection without increasing morbidity. Results suggest that the 12-core biopsy protocol is adequate for prostate cancer detection at first biopsy.

Beyond diagnosis: evolving prostate biopsy in the era of focal therapy

Despite decades of use as the “gold standard” in the detection of prostate cancer, the optimal biopsy regimen is still not universally agreed upon. While important aspects such as the need for laterally placed biopsies and the importance of apical cancer are known, repeated studies have shown significant patients with cancer on subsequent biopsy when the original biopsy was negative and an ongoing suspicion of cancer remained. Attempts to maximise the effectiveness of repeat biopsies have given rise to the alternate approaches of saturation biopsy and the transperineal approach. Recent interest in focal treatment of prostate cancer has further highlighted the need for accurate detection of prostate cancer, and in response, the introduction of transperineal template-guided biopsy. While the saturation biopsy approach and the transperineal template approach increase the detection rate of cancer in men with a previous negative biopsy and appear to have acceptable morbidity, there is a lack of clinical trials evaluating the different biopsy strategies. This paper reviews the evolution of prostatic biopsy and current controversies.

Long-term follow-up of men with isolated high-grade prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia followed by serial delayed interval biopsy

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the outcomes of serial delayed interval biopsy (DIBx) in men with isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN). The natural history of isolated HGPIN is poorly defined. Since January 2000, we have monitored men with isolated HGPIN using DIBx every 3 years, regardless of the change in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level.

METHODS

The institutional biopsy records from 1996 onward were reviewed to identify the men with isolated HGPIN found on 12-core needle biopsy specimens who had undergone a minimum of 1 DIBx in our follow-up strategy. Patient age, biopsy and prostatectomy pathologic outcomes, and longitudinal PSA measurements were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 112 men had undergone a first DIBx and 47 had undergone a second DIBx at the last follow-up examination at a mean of 34.4 and 66.2 months after the HGPIN diagnosis, respectively. Prostate cancer was found in 25 (22.3%) of 112 men and 11 (23.4%) of 47 men at DIBx-1 and DIBx-2, respectively. The PSA velocity was not predictive of cancer during short-term follow-up. Of the men diagnosed with cancer, 63.6% had a Gleason score of ≥7, and 9 (81.8%) of 11 men had clinically significant disease (Gleason score of ≥7 and/or >5% cancer volume) at surgery. All cancers were organ confined at and surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Men with isolated HGPIN have a continued risk of developing prostate cancer during long-term follow-up, regardless of the changes in the serum PSA level. Collectively, the relatively high likelihood of organ confinement and clinically significant cancer suggest empiric DIBx every 2-3 years could be a valuable tool in the follow-up of men with isolated HGPIN found by extended core biopsy.

Optimizing performance and interpretation of prostate biopsy: a critical analysis of the literature

CONTEXT

The number and location of biopsy cores and the interpretation of prostate biopsy in different clinical settings remain the subjects of continuing debate.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to review the current evidence regarding the performance and interpretation of initial, repeat, and saturation prostatic biopsy.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A comprehensive Medline search was performed using the Medical Subject Heading search terms prostate biopsy, prostate cancer, detection, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), nomogram, and diagnosis. Results were restricted to the English language, with preference given to those published within the last 3 yr.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

At initial biopsy, a minimum of 10 but not >18 systematic cores are recommended, with 14-18 cores in glands ≥ 50 cm³. Biopsies should be directed laterally, and transition zone (TZ) cores are not recommended in the initial biopsy setting. Further biopsy sets, either as an extended repeat or as a saturation biopsy (≥ 20 cores) including the TZ, are warranted in young and fit men with a persistent suspicion of prostate cancer. An immediate repeat biopsy is not indicated for prior high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis given an adequate extended initial biopsy. Conversely, biopsies with atypical glands that are suspicious but not diagnostic of cancer should be repeated within 3-6 mo. Overall recommendations for further biopsy sets (a third set or more) cannot be made. Transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsies represent the standard-of-care method of prostate sampling. However, transperineal biopsies are an up-to-standard alternative.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal prostatic biopsy regimen should be based on the individualized clinical setting of the patient and should follow the minimum standard requirements reported in this paper.

Salvage cryotherapy: is there a role for focal therapy?

Prostate cancer treatment has undergone vast development over the last few decades, but the most notable changes have included nerve-sparing open radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, including robot-assisted and, more recently, cryotherapy and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). While radical surgery is the current gold standard, the less invasive therapeutic options of cryotherapy and HIFU are regarded as largely experimental by governing bodies. In the case of cryotherapy, a wealth of experience has been accumulated demonstrating its efficacy. Initially used as a salvage treatment for radiation-failed prostate cancer, cryotherapy has been widely used as a primary treatment for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer. More recently, there has been interest expressed in the concept of focal therapy in prostate cancer. This has been evaluated as a primary treatment for prostate cancer, but little information is available regarding the potential use as a salvage treatment. In this article, we evaluate the potential for focal treatment in the salvage setting.