The management of patients with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis with serologic disease only after orchiectomy

Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and relapse in patients with clinical stage IS testicular cancer

Purpose

Clinical stage I (CSI) testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) represents disease confined to the testis without metastasis and CSIS is defined as persistently elevated tumor markers (TM) after orchiectomy, indicating subclinical metastatic disease. This study aims at assessing clinical characteristics and oncological outcome in CSIS.

Methods

Data from five tertiary referring centers in Germany were screened. We defined correct classification of CSIS according to EAU guidelines. TM levels, treatment and relapse-free survival were assessed and differences between predefined groups (chemotherapy, correct/incorrect CSIS) were analyzed with Fisher’s exact and Chi-square test.

Results

Out of 2616 TGCT patients, 43 (1.6%) were CSIS. Thereof, 27 were correctly classified (cCSIS, 1.03%) and 16 incorrectly classified (iCSIS). TMs that defined cCSIS were in 12 (44.4%), 10 (37%), 3 (11.1%) and 2 (7.4%) patients AFP, ß-HCG, AFP plus ß-HCG and LDH, respectively. In the cCSIS group, six patients were seminoma and 21 non-seminoma. Treatment consisted of active surveillance, carboplatin-mono AUC7 and BEP (bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin). No difference between cCSIS and iCSIS with respect to applied chemotherapy was found (p = 0.830). 5-year relapse-free survival was 88.9% and three patients (11%) in the cCSIS group relapsed. All underwent salvage treatment (3xBEP) with no documented death.

Conclusion

Around 1% of all TGCT were classified as cCSIS patients. Identification of cCSIS is of critical importance to avoid disease progression and relapses by adequate treatment. We report a high heterogeneity of treatment patterns, associated with excellent long-term survival irrespective of the initial treatment approach.

Treatment of clinical stage I non-seminoma

Germ cell cancers are the most common solid tumors among men between 15 and 40 years. Non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs) represent a unique and exclusive cohort of germ cell tumor patients. Non-seminoma can harbor different histologic components. The most commonly found histologies are embryonal cell cancer, teratoma, yolk sack tumor and choriocarcinoma, as well as teratocarcinoma and seminoma, in combination with non-seminomatous germ cell tumors histologic types. The clinical definition of stage I non-seminoma is the absence of metastatic lesions on imaging and normal tumor markers. The cure rate for clinical stage I NSGCT is 99% and this can be achieved by three therapeutic strategies: Active surveillance with treatment at the time of relapse, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection or adjuvant chemotherapy. The balancing of these various strategies should always be based on an individual risk profile of NGSCG patient depending on the lymphovascular invasion of the tumor.

Current management and management controversies in early- and intermediate-stage of nonseminoma germ cell tumors

Early stage nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) remains a treatable disease, with stage I cancer specific survival exceeding 95%. Using a risk-adapted approach; active surveillance (AS), adjuvant chemotherapy, and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) all options for treatment; with surveillance being increasingly used. With persistently elevated markers (stage IS), chemotherapy remains the hallmark of treatment. Management of stage II NSGCT varies based on status of tumor markers. With negative markers, both induction chemotherapy and upfront RPLND remain options. Management of a residual mass <1 cm after chemotherapy remains controversial, with AS and nerve-sparing RPLND considered options. The development of miR-371a-3p microRNA shows promise a novel biomarker for testicular cancer (GCT). Despite controversies in management, cures for NSGCT are achievable in 95-99% of patients.

Current controversies on the role of lymphadenectomy for testicular cancer for the journal: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations for the special seminars section on the role of lymphadenectomy for urologic cancers

The role of surgery in the locoregional management of many solid tumors has long been established. For testicular cancer, the incorporation of lymphadenectomy has played an important part in generating long-term survival outcomes in excess of 90% for germ cell tumor patients. In this review, we address several clinical scenarios in which lymphadenectomy at times is underutilized, and others ill advised.

Current controversies on the role of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for testicular cancer

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is an important component of the multimodal treatment which cures most patients diagnosed with testicular germ cell tumors. Considering the high cure rates achieved, research focus in recent years has been directed toward improving quality of life and decreasing long-term treatment related sequelae. Consequently, the role of RPLND has evolved over the past 3 decades in both low-stage and advanced testicular cancer. The use of RPLND in clinically stage I and low volume stage II disease may offer the advantages of treating retroperitoneal teratoma which is present in 15% to 20% of patients, avoiding chemotherapy and reducing the need for frequent imaging during follow-up. Similarly, ongoing studies are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of RPLND for the treatment of early stage seminoma to avoid the long-term effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. RPLND is traditionally used for the treatment of residual masses >1 cm after completion of chemotherapy. Its role in subcentimeter residual masses remains somewhat controversial given the fact that 25% to 30% of these patients are found to harbor either teratoma or viable nonteratomatous germ cell tumors. The presence of teratoma increases the probability of teratoma in metastatic sites. Modified unilateral templates were developed based on early mapping studies with the aim of preserving antegrade ejaculation. Recent data suggests initial mapping studies underestimated the risk of contralateral retroperitoneal metastases which may reach 32%. Furthermore, antegrade ejaculation may be preserved in >95% of patients undergoing bilateral nerve sparing primary RPLND and >80% undergoing nerve-sparing PC-RPLND, which, in our view is the more prudent oncologic approach. Recently, multiple series have demonstrated the safety and short-term efficacy of minimally invasive RPLND; however, larger studies with prolonged follow-up are required to validate the long-term oncologic efficacy of newer techniques.

IGG* Practice Guidelines on Germ Cell Tumor in Adult Male Patients

Germ cell tumors are rare neoplasms that affect young males. Nearly 99% of patients with localized stage I disease and nearly 80% of patients with metastatic disease can be cured. Even patients who relapse following chemotherapy can achieve a long-term survival in approximately 30–40% of cases. The main objective in early stages and in good prognosis patients has changed in recent years, and it has become of major importance to reduce treatment-related morbidity without compromising the excellent long-term survival rate. In poor prognosis patients, there is a correlation between the experience of the treating institution and the long-term clinical outcome of the patients, particularly when the most sophisticated therapies are needed. So far, of utmost importance is the information from updated practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of germ cell tumors. The Italian Germ cell cancer Group (IGG) has developed the following clinical recommendations, which identify the current standards in diagnosis and treatment of germ cell tumors in adult males.

Clinical outcomes in patients with stage I non-seminomatous germ cell cancer

This study assesses the long-term outcomes in Han Chinese patients with clinical stage I non-seminomatous germ cell testicular cancer (CSI NSGCT) treated with surveillance, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) and adjuvant chemotherapy. We retrospectively evaluated 89 patients with a mean age of 26.5 years. After orchiectomy, 37 patients were treated with surveillance, 34 underwent RPLND and 18 were managed with chemotherapy. The overall survival rate, the recurrence-free survival rate and the risk factors were evaluated. The median follow-up length was 92 months (range: 6-149 months). Thirteen of the 89 patients (14.6%) had relapses, and one died by the evaluation date. The overall survival rate was 98.9%. The cumulative 4-year recurrence-free rates were 80.2%, 92.0% and 100% for the surveillance, RPLND and chemotherapy groups, respectively. The disease-free period tended to be briefer in patients with a history of cryptorchidism and those with stage Is. Therefore, surveillance, RPLND and adjuvant chemotherapy might be reliable strategies in compliant patients with CSI NSGCT. Surveillance should be recommended for patients with the lowest recurrence rate, especially those without lymphovascular invasion. This study might aid the establishment of a standard therapy for CSI NSGCT in China.

Current management of testicular cancer

Germ cell tumors (GCTs) of the testis are rare, but are the most common cancer in young men. GCTs may consist of one predominant histologic pattern or may represent a mixture of multiple histologic types. For treatment purposes, two broad categories are recognized: 1) pure seminoma and 2) others, which together are termed nonseminomatous GCTs (NSGCTs). In general, seminoma tends to be less aggressive, to be diagnosed at an earlier stage, and to spread predictably along lymphatic channels to the retroperitoneum before spreading hematogenously to the lung or other organs. Compared with NSGCTs, seminoma is exquisitely sensitive to radiation therapy and platinum-based chemotherapy. NSGCTs are usually mixed tumors and teratoma often exists at the sites of metastasis with other GCT elements; cure often requires chemotherapy to kill the chemosensitive-components and surgery to remove the teratomatous components. The main factors contributing to excellent cure rates of GCTs are careful staging at diagnosis; adequate early treatment using chemotherapeutic combinations, with or without radiotherapy and surgery; and very strict follow-up and salvage therapy. We review several clinical studies and summarize the current trends in the management of GCTs.

[EAU guidelines on testicular cancer: 2011 update. European Association of Urology]

CONTEXT

On behalf of the European Association of Urology (EAU), guidelines for the diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up of testicular cancer were established.

OBJECTIVE

This article is a short version of the EAU testicular cancer guidelines and summarises the main conclusions from the guidelines on the management of testicular cancer.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Guidelines were compiled by a multidisciplinary guidelines working group. A systematic review was carried out using Medline and Embase, also taking Cochrane evidence and data from the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group into consideration. A panel of experts weighted the references, and a level of evidence and grade of recommendation were assigned.

RESULTS

There is a paucity of literature especially regarding longer term follow-up, and results from a number of ongoing trials are awaited. The choice of treatment centre is of the utmost importance, and treatment in reference centres within clinical trials, especially for poor-prognosis nonseminomatous germ cell tumours, provides better outcomes. For patients with clinical stage I seminoma, based on recently published data on long-term toxicity, adjuvant radiotherapy is no longer recommended as first-line adjuvant treatment. The TNM classification 2009 is recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines contain information for the standardised management of patients with testicular cancer based on the latest scientific insights. Cure rates are generally excellent, but because testicular cancer mainly affects men in their third or fourth decade of life, treatment effects on fertility require careful counselling of patients, and treatment must be tailored taking individual circumstances and patient preferences into account.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Although testicular cancer has excellent cure rates, the choice of treatment centre is of the utmost importance. Expert centres achieve better results for both early stage testicular cancer (lower relapse rates) and overall survival (higher stages within clinical trials). For patients with clinical stage I seminoma, adjuvant radiotherapy is no longer recommended as first-line adjuvant treatment.

[The role of tumour markers in diagnosis and management of testicular germ cell tumours]

Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), human choriogonadotropin (hCG) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) are established tumour markers of testicular germ cell tumours (TGCT) which are used according to the guidelines for primary diagnosis, staging, monitoring of therapeutic response and follow-up. Placental alkaline phosphatase and neurone-specific enolase play no role at all in the diagnosis and management of TGCT.Metastasized TGCT are classified according to the IGCCCG classification system into tumours with good, intermediate and poor prognosis depending on their serum concentration. The risk classification has a direct impact on therapy and determines the intensity of chemotherapy. In rare cases AFP and hCG might be elevated due to non-testicular reasons which have to be taken into consideration for the differential diagnosis especially if marker concentration and clinical presentation do not match. Response to chemotherapy is monitored with AFP and hCG which are determined the day before initiation of the next treatment cycle. Marker increases during or shortly after discontinuation of chemotherapy indicate a poor prognosis and make the immediate initiation of salvage treatment regimes necessary. Only 40-50% and 30% of relapses in patients under active surveillance for clinical stage I disease and after systemic chemotherapy are associated with marker increases. The remainder will be diagnosed by imaging studies or clinical symptoms. Marker increases have to be validated by imaging studies. However, about 10% of all relapsing patients have marker increases only without any imaging evidence of metastatic disease. Residual masses of any size and location have to be treated by postchemotherapy resection once the marker concentration is normalized or once it has reached a stable plateau. So-called desperation surgery in the presence of rising tumour markers is only indicated if no curative chemotherapy is available, all residual masses are completely resectable and no hCG elevation are observed. For follow-up, AFP, hCG and LDH should be evaluated for advanced TGCT and clinical stage I nonseminomas, whereas clinical stage I seminomas should be monitored without any markers.

EAU guidelines on testicular cancer: 2011 update

CONTEXT

On behalf of the European Association of Urology (EAU), guidelines for the diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up of testicular cancer were established.

OBJECTIVE

This article is a short version of the EAU testicular cancer guidelines and summarises the main conclusions from the guidelines on the management of testicular cancer.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Guidelines were compiled by a multidisciplinary guidelines working group. A systematic review was carried out using Medline and Embase, also taking Cochrane evidence and data from the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group into consideration. A panel of experts weighted the references, and a level of evidence and grade of recommendation were assigned.

RESULTS

There is a paucity of literature especially regarding longer term follow-up, and results from a number of ongoing trials are awaited. The choice of treatment centre is of the utmost importance, and treatment in reference centres within clinical trials, especially for poor-prognosis nonseminomatous germ cell tumours, provides better outcomes. For patients with clinical stage I seminoma, based on recently published data on long-term toxicity, adjuvant radiotherapy is no longer recommended as first-line adjuvant treatment. The TNM classification 2009 is recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines contain information for the standardised management of patients with testicular cancer based on the latest scientific insights. Cure rates are generally excellent, but because testicular cancer mainly affects men in their third or fourth decade of life, treatment effects on fertility require careful counselling of patients, and treatment must be tailored taking individual circumstances and patient preferences into account.

American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline on Uses of Serum Tumor Markers in Adult Males With Germ Cell Tumors

Purpose

To provide recommendations on appropriate uses for serum markers of germ cell tumors (GCTs).

Methods

Searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE identified relevant studies published in English. Primary outcomes included marker accuracy to predict the impact of decisions on outcomes. Secondary outcomes included proportions of patients with elevated markers and statistical tests of elevations as prognostic factors. An expert panel developed consensus guidelines based on data from 82 reports.

Results

No studies directly compared outcomes of decisions with versus without marker assays. The search identified few prospective studies and no randomized controlled trials; most were retrospective series. Lacking data on primary outcomes, most Panel recommendations are based on secondary outcomes (relapse rates and time to relapse).

Recommendations

The Panel recommended against using markers to screen for GCTs, to decide whether orchiectomy is indicated, or to select treatment for patients with cancer of unknown primary. To stage patients with testicular nonseminomas, the Panel recommended measuring three markers (α-fetoprotein [AFP], human chorionic gonadotropin [hCG], and lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]) before and after orchiectomy and before chemotherapy for those with extragonadal nonseminomas. They also recommended measuring AFP and hCG shortly before retroperitoneal lymph node dissection and at the start of each chemotherapy cycle for nonseminoma, and periodically to monitor for relapse. The Panel recommended measuring postorchiectomy hCG and LDH for patients with seminoma and preorchiectomy elevations. They recommended against using markers to guide or monitor treatment for seminoma or to detect relapse in those treated for stage I. However, they recommended measuring hCG and AFP to monitor for relapse in patients treated for advanced seminoma.

Management of good-risk metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis: current concepts and controversies

INTRODUCTION/METHODS

Approximately 30% of nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors (NSGCT) of the testis present with metastatic disease. In 1997, the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) stratified all patients with metastatic NSGCT into various risk groups based on serum tumor markers and presence of visceral disease. We review the literature and present optimal stage-dependent management strategies in patients with favorable-risk metastatic NSGCT.

RESULTS

Primary chemotherapy (3 cycles BEP or 4 cycles EP) has been shown to be the preferred modality in patients with Clinical Stage IS (cIS) and in patients with bulky metastatic disease (>/=CS IIb) due to their high risk of systemic disease and recurrence. Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection appears to be the most efficient primary therapy for retroperitoneal disease <2 cm (CS IIa), with adjuvant chemotherapy reserved for patients who are pathologically advanced (>5 nodes involved, single node > 2 cm) and for those who are non-compliant with surveillance regimens. Following primary chemotherapy, STM and radiographic evaluation are used to assess treatment response. For patients with normalization of STM and retroperitoneal masses < 1 cm, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection or observation with treatment at disease progression are considered options. Due to risk of teratoma or chemoresistant GCT, masses >1 cm and extra-retroperitoneal masses should be treated with surgical resection, which should be performed with nerve-sparing, if possible.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with favorable disease based on IGCCCG criteria, clinical stage, STM, and radiographic evaluation are used to guide appropriate therapy to provide excellent long-term cure rates (>92%) in patients with metastatic NSGCT.

Surgical management of low-stage nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer

The optimal treatment of low-stage nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer (NSGCT) is controversial. For clinical stage (CS) I NSGCT, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), two cycles of chemotherapy and surveillance are all accepted treatment options. For CS IIA-B, standard treatments include RPLND (+/- adjuvant chemotherapy) and induction chemotherapy (+/- RPLND). The long-term survival rate is >97% for CS I and 95% for CS IIA-B NSGCT, regardless of the treatment received. The risk of retroperitoneal metastasis varies by clinical stage (25-35% for CS I, 65-85% for CS IIA-B), and the presence of lymphovascular invasion and percentage of embryonal carcinoma in the primary tumour. Patients with elevated serum tumour markers (STMs) and adenopathy of >3 cm are at high risk of having occult systemic disease. Compared with chemotherapy, RPLND is associated with a considerably more favourable long-term morbidity profile and is the most effective method for controlling the retroperitoneum. Surveillance is associated with the lowest risk of long-term complications. As such, we favour surveillance for low-risk CS I, induction chemotherapy for those at high risk of systemic disease (elevated STM, adenopathy >3 cm), and RPLND for all others. Modified template dissections reduce the risk of ejaculatory dysfunction, but might increase the risk of local recurrence. Therefore, we favour a full-bilateral template dissection with nerve-sparing in patients with low-stage NSGCT. The therapeutic efficacy of laparoscopic RPLND is not proven and currently should be considered a staging procedure only. Adjuvant chemotherapy after RPLND is typically restricted to patients with pathological stage N2-3 disease.

Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in patients with clinical stage IS testis cancer

PURPOSE

Initial management for clinical stage IS (persistently increased tumor markers) nonseminomatous germ cell tumor has evolved from primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection to induction chemotherapy at most medical centers. We analyzed the outcome in patients treated with primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the charts of patients who underwent retroperitoneal lymph node dissection at Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Dana Farber Cancer Center from 1993 to 2008. All patients with clinical stage IS were identified and perioperative data were obtained.

RESULTS

A total of 280 patients who underwent retroperitoneal lymph node dissection were identified, of whom 24 identified with clinical stage IS underwent primary dissection. Median followup was 2.9 years. Histopathology revealed an embryonal carcinoma component in 24 orchiectomy specimens (100%) with associated teratoma in 15 (63%). Positive lymph nodes were identified at retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in 9 patients (38%), including pure embryonal carcinoma in 6 (67%), combined embryonal carcinoma and teratoma in 1, embryonal carcinoma, choriocarcinoma and teratoma in 1, and only teratoma in 1. Of the patients who underwent primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection 5 (21%) also received chemotherapy postoperatively, which was due to persistently increased tumor markers in 3 (13%). No retroperitoneal recurrence was noted on followup imaging. At surgery estimated blood loss was 175 cc, operative time was 3.1 hours and hospital stay was 3.9 days. There were no deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with clinical stage IS are at significant risk for metastatic disease and can be successfully treated with primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, thereby sparing chemotherapy in most of them. Retroperitoneal recurrence is essentially eliminated when retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is performed in this select patient group.

National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for Use of Tumor Markers in Testicular, Prostate, Colorectal, Breast, and Ovarian Cancers

Background: Updated National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB) Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for the use of tumor markers in the clinic have been developed.

Methods: Published reports relevant to use of tumor markers for 5 cancer sites—testicular, prostate, colorectal, breast, and ovarian—were critically reviewed.

Results: For testicular cancer, α-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, and lactate dehydrogenase are recommended for diagnosis/case finding, staging, prognosis determination, recurrence detection, and therapy monitoring. α-Fetoprotein is also recommended for differential diagnosis of nonseminomatous and seminomatous germ cell tumors. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is not recommended for prostate cancer screening, but may be used for detecting disease recurrence and monitoring therapy. Free PSA measurement data are useful for distinguishing malignant from benign prostatic disease when total PSA is &lt;10 μg/L. In colorectal cancer, carcinoembryonic antigen is recommended (with some caveats) for prognosis determination, postoperative surveillance, and therapy monitoring in advanced disease. Fecal occult blood testing may be used for screening asymptomatic adults 50 years or older. For breast cancer, estrogen and progesterone receptors are mandatory for predicting response to hormone therapy, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 measurement is mandatory for predicting response to trastuzumab, and urokinase plasminogen activator/plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 may be used for determining prognosis in lymph node–negative patients. CA15-3/BR27–29 or carcinoembryonic antigen may be used for therapy monitoring in advanced disease. CA125 is recommended (with transvaginal ultrasound) for early detection of ovarian cancer in women at high risk for this disease. CA125 is also recommended for differential diagnosis of suspicious pelvic masses in postmenopausal women, as well as for detection of recurrence, monitoring of therapy, and determination of prognosis in women with ovarian cancer.

Conclusions: Implementation of these recommendations should encourage optimal use of tumor markers.

The indication for postchemotherapy lymph node dissection in clinical stage IS nonseminomatous germ cell tumor

BACKGROUND

The initial management of patients with clinical stage IS (cIS) nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) has evolved from primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) to induction chemotherapy. The objectives of the current study were to determine the clinical outcome, patterns of relapse, and incidence of teratoma in the retroperitoneum for men with cIS NSGCT.

METHODS

Between 1988 and 2004, 24 patients with cIS stage NSGCT were evaluated and treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Clinical and pathologic data were obtained from the institutional prospective database. Seven patients underwent primary RPLND, and 17 patients received induction chemotherapy as initial management. Clinical outcomes, patterns of relapse, and pathologic findings were reported.

RESULTS

Six of the 7 patients who underwent primary RPLND had viable germ cell tumor (GCT) present. Four of those patients did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, and all experienced systemic relapse. Of the 17 patients who received induction chemotherapy, 3 patients underwent elective postchemotherapy RPLND (PC-RPLND), and 14 patients were followed expectantly. Four patients who were followed expectantly relapsed in the retroperitoneum and underwent PC-RPLND. Of the 7 patients who underwent PC-RPLND, 1 patient had fibrosis (14%), but 6 patients (86%) had teratoma, including 1 patient who also had a viable GCT in the retroperitoneum. Overall, the incidence of teratoma or viable GCT in the retroperitoneum after chemotherapy was 43% (6 of 14 patients). At a median follow-up of 35 months, 23 men remained alive, and 1 man had died of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The current data suggest that patients with cIS stage NSGCT will benefit from adjuvant PC-RPLND.

Three cycles of etoposide and cisplatin chemotherapy in clinical stage IS nonseminomatous testicular cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of three cycles of etoposide and cisplatin (EP) chemotherapy in the patients with serological disease only after orchiectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen patients with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis and elevated serum tumor markers as the only evidence of persistent disease following radical orchiectomy (clinical stage IS cancer), were treated at our institution from March 1995 to February 2003. All patients received three cycles of EP chemotherapy. The toxicity was compared with that in control group consisting of 93 patients treated with three standard cycles of cisplatin, etoposide and bleomycin for good-prognosis metastatic diseases.

RESULTS

The markers normalized in all patients after one (in 11 cases) or two (in 4 cases) cycles. One patient required subsequent surgery for recurrent retroperitoneal mature teratoma. All patients remained disease-free during the median follow-up period of 85 months (range: 33-128). In patients receiving EP chemotherapy less number of treatment cycles was associated with grade IV leukopenia compared to control group (p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

A treatment program that consists of three cycles of EP caused complete disease control in all patients. The applied regimen may be considered as a therapeutic option with reduced toxicity in clinical stage IS nonseminomatous testicular cancer patients. More evidence, however, needs to be accumulated.

Post Chemotherapy RPLND in Patients with Elevated Markers: Current Concepts and Clinical Outcome

Elevated serum tumor markers after cisplatin-based chemotherapy usually contraindicate surgery because of the presence of active germ-cell elements; however, some patients have undergone PCRPLND with curative intent. We evaluated the role of surgery to resect retroperitoneal-only marker positive tumor. Residual germ-cell cancer was identified in 50% of patients with elevated tumor markers with one third alive at 5 years; 5-year survival with residual teratoma or necrosis was 77.5% and 85.7%, respectively. Predictors of retroperitoneal teratoma or fibrosis included declining tumor makers at surgery, betaHCG < 100, and first-line chemotherapy. Predictors of death included rising preoperative betaHCG, elevated AFP, redo RPLND, and active germ-cell cancer in the resected specimen. Select patients with elevated tumor markers after chemotherapy are cured with surgery.

Does the Presence of Extranodal Extension in Pathological Stage B1 Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor Necessitate Adjuvant Chemotherapy?

PURPOSE

The presence of extranodal extension identified at primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection has been associated with an increased risk of disease recurrence, and as such these patients are sometimes treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. We decided to evaluate the significance of extranodal extension on disease-free survival in patients with pathological stage B nonseminomatous germ cell tumor who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of our testicular cancer database was performed to identify all patients with clinical stage A nonseminomatous germ cell tumor who underwent primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection and were found to have retroperitoneal metastasis with 5 or fewer involved nodes and no metastatic node larger than 2 cm. No patient received adjuvant chemotherapy, and all had a minimum followup of 24 months. A single pathologist (LC), who was blinded to clinical outcome, reviewed the retroperitoneal nodal package to identify the presence or absence of extranodal extension, defined as cancer perforating through the lymph node capsule into perinodal tissue.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients were identified with a median followup 48 months, and a 2 and 5-year disease-free survival of 75%. Extranodal extension was present in 23 patients and absent in 57 patients with a median followup of 54 and 44 months, respectively. The 5-year disease-free survival for patients with and without extranodal extension was 74% and 75%, respectively (p=0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

We were unable to detect any prognostic significance of extranodal extension in patients found to have retroperitoneal metastasis at primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.

Pathologic findings and therapeutic outcome of desperation post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in advanced germ cell cancer

Increased serum tumor markers after cisplatin-based chemotherapy have usually been considered a contraindication to surgery because of the presence of persistent active germ cell elements. However, a select population of patients with elevated serum tumor markers have undergone post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) with curative intent. We evaluated the role of surgery to resect retroperitoneal-only marker positive tumor. Long-term survival was observed in 50% of patients. Residual germ cell cancer was identified in 50% of patients, with a third alive at 5 years with no observed benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Select patients with increased tumor markers after chemotherapy are cured with surgery.

Guidelines on Testicular Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To up-date the 2001 version of the EAU testicular cancer guidelines.

METHODS

A non-structured literature review until January 2005 using the MEDLINE database has been performed. Literature has been classified according to evidence-based medicine levels.

RESULTS

Testicular cancer is a highly curable disease. Excellent cure rates have been achieved by standardization of treatment, interdisciplinary management, and tremendous success in performing clinical trials. Currently, the aims of testicular cancer treatment are as follows: for patients with low-stage disease, a reduction in treatment is proposed to improve long-term toxicity in these patients with unaltered life expectancy; for about 10% of patients with advanced disease and poor prognosis, intensification of treatment (including high-dose chemotherapy and new drugs as well as aggressive surgical approaches) is being investigated to improve long-term cure rates.

CONCLUSION

Guidelines will improve clinical practice only if they are regularly updated. This update presents the state-of-the-art management of testicular cancer patients in 2005.

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in patients with low stage testicular cancer with embryonal carcinoma predominance and/or lymphovascular invasion

PURPOSE

The outcome after primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) was analyzed in patients with clinical stage I-IIA nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer with embryonal carcinoma predominance (ECP) or lymphovascular invasion (LVI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1989 and 2002, 267 patients with clinical stage I-IIA nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer, and ECP and/or LVI underwent RPLND. Patient information was obtained from a prospective database. Median followup was 53 months.

RESULTS

Overall 42% of patients had pathological stage (PS) II disease, of whom 54% had low volume (PN1) disease and 16% had retroperitoneal teratoma. The 5-year progression-free probability was 90% overall, 90% for PS I and 86% for PN1. All patients with relapse were continuously free of disease following standard chemotherapy with or without resection of residual masses and the 10-year actuarial overall survival was 100%. When adjuvant chemotherapy was restricted to patients with PN2 disease, the estimated 5-year relapse rate was 9% and an estimated 72% of patients avoided chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The low risk of systemic relapse in patients with PS I and PN1 after RPLND alone combined with the 16% incidence of retroperitoneal teratoma and the favorable morbidity profile supports RPLND over primary chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with low stage disease with ECP and/or LVI who are not candidates for surveillance. An estimated 72% of patients are spared the potential toxicity of chemotherapy if adjuvant therapy is restricted to patients with PN2. After primary RPLND and selective adjuvant chemotherapy late recurrence is distinctly uncommon and long-term cancer control is anticipated in essentially all patients.

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer: impact of patient selection factors on outcome

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of patient selection criteria on the outcome of patients with nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer (NSGCT) treated by primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). Since 1999, our criteria have excluded patients with persistent postorchiectomy elevation of serum tumor markers (STM) or clinical stage (CS) IIB disease from RPLND.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1989 and 2002, 453 patients underwent primary RPLND at our institution for CS I to IIB NSGCT. Patient information was obtained from a prospective database. Retroperitoneal pathology and relapse rates were compared for patients treated before and after application of the current selection criteria in 1999.

RESULTS

By excluding patients with elevated STM or CS IIB disease after 1999, the proportion of pathologic stage II patients with low-volume (pN1) retroperitoneal disease increased significantly (40% before 1999 v 64% after 1999; P = .01), without significantly affecting the rate of retroperitoneal teratoma (21% v 22%, respectively; P = .89) or pathologic stage I disease (56% v 67%, respectively; P = .06). For patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, the 4-year progression-free probability improved significantly from 83% before 1999 (95% CI, 79% to 88%) to 96% after 1999 (95% CI, 91% to 100%; P = .005). Elevated postorchiectomy STM (P < .0001), clinical stage (P = .0002), and pre-1999 RPLND (P = .05) were independent pretreatment predictors of progression.

CONCLUSION

Excluding patients with CS IIB disease or elevated postorchiectomy STM from primary RPLND has had a favorable impact on the extent of retroperitoneal disease and has significantly reduced the risk of relapse after RPLND. For patients with normal STM and CS I to IIA disease, the low rate of systemic progression and 22% incidence of retroperitoneal teratoma supports RPLND as the preferred primary intervention.

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in the treatment of low-stage nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testicle: An update

Nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) of the testicle are highly treatable and curable. The evolution of cancer control for this disease has shown an effective integration of medical and surgical approaches over the last 3 decades. Current emphasis in the therapy of NSGCT focuses on minimizing treatment-related morbidity while maintaining consistently high cure rates as previously seen. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in experienced hands is a critical component of the treatment armamentarium in this disease. RPLND is an accurate staging tool providing important information to determine the need for chemotherapy. When performed properly, RPLND eliminates the retroperitoneum as a site for relapse, which in turn provides emotional and psychological relief to the patient, and simplifies the follow-up protocol. RPLND alone can also provide high cure rates in patients with low clinical stage disease and high risk factors, such as lymphovascular invasion or predominance of embryonal histology in the primary tumor. Teratoma is chemoresistant and, when present in the primary tumor of patients with low stage, may be best treated with primary RPLND. Primary chemotherapy in the treatment of low stage NSGCT deserves continual investigation as long-term toxicities become more apparent. Observation is an option for the highly motivated patient but requires a rigorous follow-up schedule to avoid relapse. Laparoscopic RPLND is a viable staging tool; however, oncologic control of the retroperitoneum has not been reliably determined.

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in the treatment of low-stage nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testicle

Nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testicle are highly treatable and curable. The evolution of cancer control for this disease has demonstrated an effective integration of medical and surgical approaches over the last 30 years. Current emphasis in the therapy of nonseminomatous germ cell tumors focuses on minimizing treatment-related morbidity while maintaining consistently high cure rates. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in experienced hands is a critical component of the treatment armamentarium in this disease. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is an accurate staging tool that provides important information in determining the need for chemotherapy. When performed properly, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection eliminates the retroperitoneum as a site for relapse, which in turn provides emotional and psychological relief to the patient and simplifies the follow-up protocol. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection alone can also provide high cure rates in patients with clinical low-stage disease and high-risk factors such as lymphovascular invasion or predominance of embryonal histology in the primary tumor. Teratoma is known to be chemoresistant and, when present in the primary tumor of low-stage patients, may be best treated with primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Primary chemotherapy in the treatment of low-stage nonseminomatous germ cell tumors deserves continual investigation as long-term toxicities become more apparent. Observation is an option for the highly motivated patient, but requires a rigorous follow-up schedule to avoid relapse. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is a viable staging tool, however, oncologic control of the retroperitoneum has not been reliably determined.

Germ cell tumours of the testis

Cancer of the testis is a relatively rare disease, accounting for about 1% of all cancers in men. Cryptorchidism is the only confirmed risk factor for testicular germ cell tumour. The majority of GCT are clinically detectable at initial presentation. Any nodular, hard, or fixed area discovered in the testis, must be considered neoplastic until proved otherwise. The appropriate surgical procedure to make the diagnosis is a radical orchidectomy through an inguinal incision. Many GCT produce tumoural markers (AFP, HCG, LDH), who are useful in the diagnosis and staging of disease; to monitor the therapeutic response and to detect tumour recurrence. In 1997 a prognostic factor-based classification for the metastatic germ cell tumours was developed by the IGCCCG: good, intermediate and poor prognosis, with 5-year survival of 91, 79 and 48%, respectively. GCT of the testis is a highly table, often curable, cancer. Germ cell testicular cancers are divided into seminoma and non-seminoma types for treatment planning because seminomatous testicular cancers are more sensitive to radiotherapy. Seminoma (all stages combined) has a cure rate of greater than 90%. For patients with low-stage disease, the cure approaches 100%. For patients with non-seminoma tumours, the cure rate is >95% in stages I and II; it is approximately 70% with standard chemotherapy and resection of residual disease, if necessary, in stages III and IV. Minimum guidelines for clinical, biochemical, and radiological follow-up have been reported by ESMO in 2001.

The role of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in the management of testicular cancer

Despite continued refinement in terms of technique and the integration of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in the management of patients with testicular cancer, RPLND remains an essential component in the ultimate cure of these patients. The failure to eradicate all disease in the retroperitoneum exposes patients to the risk of late relapse events with potentially lethal consequences. For patients with low-stage nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT), primary RPLND is an important staging tool to define subsequent treatment requirements, simplify the follow-up of patients by obviating the need for routine abdominal imaging, and limit the exposure of patients to the long-term toxicity of chemotherapy. RPLND alone is curative in up to 90% of patients with low-volume retroperitoneal disease. In the post-chemotherapy setting, the inability to reliably exclude the presence of teratoma or viable germ cell cancer in the retroperitoneum mandates that post-chemotherapy RPLND be performed for all NSGCT patients with residual masses. With improvements in surgical technique and perioperative care, RPLND is associated with minimal short- and long-term morbidity in the hands of experienced surgeons at dedicated centers. This article reviews the role of RPLND in the management of patients with NSGCT at all stages and its role in advanced seminoma.

Recommendations of follow-up after treatment of germ cell tumors

Patients diagnosed with germ cell tumors (GCT) are relatively young, and most are rendered disease-free by primary treatment. Also, second-line therapies in nearly all instances are potentially curative. Therefore, the schedule and modalities of follow-up testing are important issues in detecting recurrence of GCT and for detecting secondary malignancies and complications of therapy. Follow-up is usually based on the pattern and probability of recurrence following primary therapy according to stage and histology. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network has outlined guidelines (www.nccn.org/physician_gls/index.html). There is a paucity of randomized data regarding the follow-up regimens most effective in identifying relapsed disease. Optimal means of imaging and frequency of physician visits and serum marker level measurements need to be further addressed.

Low-volume nodal metastases detected at retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for testicular cancer: pattern and prognostic factors for relapse

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence, pattern, and predictive factors for relapse in patients with low-volume nodal metastases (stage pN1) at retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RPLND) and identify who may benefit from chemotherapy in the adjuvant or primary setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-four patients with testicular nonseminomatous germ cell tumor had low-volume retroperitoneal metastases (pathologic stage pN1, 1997 tumor-node-metastasis classification) resected at RPLND, 50 of whom were managed expectantly without adjuvant chemotherapy. The dissection was bilateral in 12 and was a modified template in 38 patients. Retroperitoneal metastases were limited to microscopic nodal involvement in 14 patients. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 106 months (median, 31.4 months).

RESULTS

Eleven patients (22%) suffered a relapse at a median follow-up of 1.8 months (range, 0.6 to 28 months). The most frequent form of recurrence was marker elevation in nine (18%) patients. Persistent marker elevation after orchiectomy and before retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy was a significant independent predictor of relapse (relative risk, 8.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.3 to 27.8; P =.001). Four of five (80%) patients with elevated markers (alpha-fetoprotein alone in three, alpha-fetoprotein and beta human chorionic gonadotropin in one) suffered a relapse, compared with seven of 45 (15.6%) patients with normal markers.

CONCLUSION

Clinical stage I and IIA patients with normal markers who have low-volume nodal metastases have a low incidence of relapse and can be managed by observation only if compliance can be assured. In contrast, patients with elevated markers before retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy have a high rate of relapse and should be considered for primary chemotherapy.

Chemioterapia primaria e trattamento delle masse residue nei tumori germinali non seminomatosi del testicolo. La nostra esperienza

Thanks to the introduction of new chemotherapeutic agents, treatment of non-seminomatous germinal cell tumours (NSGCT) has dramatically improved during the last two decades. The association of chemotherapy and surgery has further increased the therapeutic success rate. The authors report their experience on this subject over the last ten years. Although the number of patients is relatively small and statistically insignificant, the results compare well with those of large centres dealing with this pathology.