Vasectomy and nonfatal myocardial infarction: continued observation indicates no elevation of risk

Canadian Contraception Consensus

This document has been archived because it contains outdated information. It should not be consulted for clinical use, but for historical research only. Please visit the journal website for the most recent guidelines.

Vasectomy and subsequent cardiovascular disease in US physicians

Due to previous animal research suggesting accelerated atherosclerosis following vasectomy, we examined whether vasectomy increases the risk of subsequent cardiovascular disease (CVD), including myocardial infarction (MI), angina pectoris, coronary revascularization, and stroke, in the US Physicians' Health Study. Of 22,071 US male physicians participating in the study, aged 40 to 84 years at entry and free from cardiovascular disease and cancer, 21,028 reported on the 60-month questionnaire whether they had undergone vasectomy prior to randomization. Of the 4546 physicians with vasectomy, 1159 had undergone the procedure at least 15 years before entry. During 258,892 person-years of follow-up, we documented 773 cases of MI (719 nonfatal and 54 fatal), 1907 cases of angina pectoris or coronary revascularization, and 604 confirmed cases of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke (566 nonfatal and 38 fatal). When compared to men without prior vasectomy, the multivariate relative risk (RR) of total MI adjusted for age and other coronary risk factors was 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-1.14) among men with vasectomy. Risk estimates for fatal and nonfatal events did not appreciably differ from each other. For angina or coronary revascularization or both, the multivariate relative risk was 0.99 (0.88-1.12) and for total stroke the RR was 0.95 (0.75-1.21). For men who had undergone vasectomy 15 or more years previously, the multivariate relative risks were 0.98 (0.73-1.32) for total MI, 1.17 (0.87-1.57) for total stroke, and 1.12 (0.94-1.35) for angina/revascularization. These results provide reassuring evidence that vasectomy does not materially increase the risk of subsequent cardiovascular disease, even 15 or more years following the procedure.

Vasectomy and vasectomy reversal

Vasectomy remains the safest method of birth control and there is much to commend it in the setting of a stable family relationship. However, some aspects of this operation have been wrongly presented in an attempt to widen its popularity and increase public acceptance. A simple procedure it may be but it is not totally free of complications; sometimes the operation has to be repeated and rarely it may reverse spontaneously even after the most stringent precautions. The family planning officer who counsels a prospective candidate and the surgeon who undertakes the procedure must ensure that these facts are understood by the patient with crystal clarity and that this fact is duly recorded on a signed and witnessed permission slip. Any organization which includes vasectomy in its programme of family planning should include advice and referral for vasectomy reversal in exactly the same way that the pill may be stopped or a coil can be removed. Fertility can be successfully restored by vasovasostomy in 50% of men who wish to have their vasectomies reversed, which often is due to a change in circumstances beyond their direct control.

Vasectomy, serum assays, and coronary heart disease symptoms and risk factors

We compared three serum assays (two antisperm antibody assays and one assay for circulating immune complexes) and a number of CHD-related variables in 69 vasectomized (V) and 126 non-vasectomized (NV) participants in the Portland Center for the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Significant differences between the V and NV men were found in sperm agglutination (SA) and sperm immobilization (SI) titers, as well as in several CHD risk factors, symptoms, and treatments; men in the V group had higher titers for SA and SI, smoked more, and had lower diastolic and systolic blood pressure than men in the NV group. Differences between V and NV in SA and SI activity remained even after we controlled for any effects that CHD risk factors, symptoms, and treatments may have had on the serum assays. Antibody development tended to decrease with age-at-vasectomy and increase with time-post-vasectomy. In the case of SA the antibodies clearly increased with time-post-vasectomy.

Does vasectomy have long-term effects on somatic and psychological health status?

All the major international articles on the somatic and psychological consequences of vasectomy published over the last 10 years have been reviewed and analysed. Although some experiments on animals have revealed harmful effects, none of the large-scale epidemiological studies has pointed to any increase in health risks (cardiovascular, hypertensive, psychiatric) in vasectomized men. The contradictions which arise between the clinical and large-scale epidemiological studies may be the result of methodological or experimental conditions. As our knowledge stands at present it can therefore be considered that vasectomy has no major effects on the physical or mental health of men.

Effect of vasectomy on high density lipoproteins

Primate research has associated vasectomy with accelerated rates of atherogenesis. We have evaluated the effect of vasectomy on serum lipoprotein profiles in healthy men. There was a decrease in high density lipoprotein levels, which was greatest in men with a family history of atherosclerotic disease. With the great number of variables known to affect high density lipoprotein levels further studies are needed to determine if this change can be attributed to the vasectomy.