Clozapine occupies high levels of dopamine D2 receptors

Imaging the Vesicular Acetylcholine Transporter in Schizophrenia: A Positron Emission Tomography Study Using [18F]-VAT

BACKGROUND

Despite longstanding interest in the central cholinergic system in schizophrenia (SCZ), cholinergic imaging studies with patients have been limited to receptors. Here, we conducted a proof-of-concept positron emission tomography study using [18F]-VAT, a new radiotracer that targets the vesicular acetylcholine transporter as a proxy measure of acetylcholine transmission capacity, in patients with SCZ and explored relationships of vesicular acetylcholine transporter with clinical symptoms and cognition.

METHODS

A total of 18 adult patients with SCZ or schizoaffective disorder (the SCZ group) and 14 healthy control participants underwent a positron emission tomography scan with [18F]-VAT. Distribution volume (VT) for [18F]-VAT was derived for each region of interest, and group differences in VT were assessed with 2-sample t tests. Functional significance was explored through correlations between VT and scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and a computerized neurocognitive battery (PennCNB).

RESULTS

No group differences in [18F]-VAT VT were observed. However, within the SCZ group, psychosis symptom severity was positively associated with VT in multiple regions of interest, with the strongest effects in the hippocampus, thalamus, midbrain, cerebellum, and cortex. In addition, in the SCZ group, working memory performance was negatively associated with VT in the substantia innominata and several cortical regions of interest including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

CONCLUSIONS

In this initial study, the severity of 2 important features of SCZ-psychosis and working memory deficit-was strongly associated with [18F]-VAT VT in several cortical and subcortical regions. These correlations provide preliminary evidence of cholinergic activity involvement in SCZ and, if replicated in larger samples, could lead to a more complete mechanistic understanding of psychosis and cognitive deficits in SCZ and the development of therapeutic targets.

Clozapine, atypical antipsychotics, and the benefits of fast-off D2 dopamine receptor antagonism

Drug-receptor interactions are traditionally quantified in terms of affinity and efficacy, but there is increasing awareness that the drug-on-receptor residence time also affects clinical performance. While most interest has hitherto been focused on slow-dissociating drugs, D(2) dopamine receptor antagonists show less extrapyramidal side effects but still have excellent antipsychotic activity when they dissociate swiftly. Fast dissociation of clozapine, the prototype of the "atypical antipsychotics", has been evidenced by distinct radioligand binding approaches both on cell membranes and intact cells. The surmountable nature of clozapine in functional assays with fast-emerging responses like calcium transients is confirmatory. Potential advantages and pitfalls of the hitherto used techniques are discussed, and recommendations are given to obtain more precise dissociation rates for such drugs. Surmountable antagonism is necessary to allow sufficient D(2) receptor stimulation by endogenous dopamine in the striatum. Simulations are presented to find out whether this can be achieved during sub-second bursts in dopamine concentration or rather during much slower, activity-related increases thereof. While the antagonist's dissociation rate is important to distinguish between both mechanisms, this becomes much less so when contemplating time intervals between successive drug intakes, i.e., when pharmacokinetic considerations prevail. Attention is also drawn to the divergent residence times of hydrophobic antagonists like haloperidol when comparing radioligand binding data on cell membranes with those on intact cells and clinical data.

Second-generation antipsychotics: is there evidence for sex differences in pharmacokinetic and adverse effect profiles?

Six second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone and ziprasidone, are currently US FDA approved. The aim of this review is to investigate whether sex differences exist for efficacy and adverse effects of these drugs.Sex-related differences have been shown in the pharmacokinetics of cytochrome P450 (CYP), with a higher activity in females for CYP3A4 and CYP2D6. However, even if there are pharmacokinetic differences between females and males, significantly higher plasma concentrations in women have been demonstrated only for olanzapine and clozapine. To date, sex differences in adverse effects have not been well studied, but some adverse effects such as weight gain, hyperprolactinaemia and cardiac effects are reported to be particularly problematic for women. Most of the studies reviewed indicate that clozapine and olanzapine are associated with greater bodyweight gain than the other atypical antipsychotics, and that serious adverse effects such as metabolic syndrome, which includes increased visceral adiposity, hyperglycaemia, hypertension and dyslipidaemia induced by SGAs, are more frequent in females. According to most studies, the risk for cardiac adverse effects induced by SGAs is the same in male and female patients. Although women are at a lower risk of sudden cardiac death, they have a higher risk of induced long QT syndrome from antiarrhythmic and, probably, antipsychotic drugs. The propensity of sexual dysfunctions is higher with conventional antipsychotics than with SGAs. Additionally, there is some evidence that female sexual dysfunction is associated with high prolactin levels; however, whether the degree of prolactin level elevation is different between female and male patients remains controversial. There is no evidence for sex differences for any of the SGAs to cause a higher rate of extrapyramidal symptoms, acute dystonia or any other movement disturbance. Knowledge of the risks and benefits associated with the use of SGAs during pregnancy and lactation is limited, although the direction of dose adjustments during pregnancy depends on the drug and the enzyme that is responsible for its metabolism. In general, data on sex differences were mostly obtained by posthoc analysis and, therefore, the conclusions that can be drawn are limited. For a better understanding of the basic mechanisms of sex differences, future studies with a primary focus on this topic are required. Data that are more specific will help determine the extent to which these differences will have implications for clinical management.

In vivo occupancy of dopamine D2 receptors by antipsychotic drugs and novel compounds in the mouse striatum and olfactory tubercles

Interaction with dopamine D2-like receptors plays a major role in the therapeutic effects of antipsychotic drugs. We examined in vivo dopamine D2 receptor occupancy of various established and potential antipsychotics in mouse striatum and olfactory tubercles 1 h after administration of the compound, using [3H]nemonapride as a ligand. All the compounds reduced in vivo binding of [3H]nemonapride in the striatum. When administered systemically, conventional antipsychotics, D2 antagonists, nemonapride (ID50: 0.034 mg/kg), eticlopride (0.047), haloperidol (0.11) and raclopride (0.11) potently inhibited [3H]nemonapride binding. The 'atypical' antipsychotics, risperidone (0.18), ziprasidone (0.38), aripiprazole (1.6), olanzapine (0.99), and clozapine (11.1) were less potent for occupying D2-like receptors. New compounds, displaying marked agonism at 5-HT1A receptors in addition to D2 receptor affinity, exhibited varying D2 receptor occupancy: bifeprunox (0.25), SLV313 (0.78), SSR181507 (1.6) and sarizotan (6.7). ID50 values for inhibition of [3H]nemonapride binding in the striatum correlated with those in the olfactory tubercles (r=0.95, P<0.0001). These values also correlated with previously-reported in vitro affinity of the compounds at rat D2 receptors (r=0.85, P=0.0001) and with inhibition of apomorphine-induced climbing in mice (r=0.79 P=0.0005). In contrast, there was no significant correlation between ID50 values herein and previously-reported ED50 values for catalepsy in mice. These data indicate that: (1) there is no difference in D2 receptor occupancy in limbic versus striatal regions between most classical and atypical or potential antipsychotics; and (2) high occupancy of D2 receptors can be dissociated from catalepsy, if the drugs also activate 5-HT1A receptors. Taken together, these data support the strategy of simultaneously targeting D2 receptor blockade and 5-HT1A receptor activation for new antipsychotics.

Mechanism of action of aripiprazole predicts clinical efficacy and a favourable side-effect profile

The antipsychotic efficacy of aripiprazole is not generally associated with extrapyramidal symptoms, cardiovascular effects, sedation or elevations in serum prolactin that characterize typical or atypical antipsychotics. The aim of this study was to clarify the mechanism of action of aripiprazole that underlies its favourable clinical profiles. The preclinical efficacy and side-effect profiles of aripiprazole were evaluated using several pharmaco-behavioural test systems in mice and rats, both in vivo and ex vivo, and compared with those of other conventional and atypical antipsychotics. Each of the antipsychotics induced catalepsy and inhibited apomorphine-induced stereotypy. The catalepsy liability ratios for these drugs were 6.5 for aripiprazole, 4.7 for both olanzapine and risperidone. The ptosis liability ratios for aripiprazole, olanzapine and risperidone were 14, 7.2 and 3.3, respectively. Aripiprazole slightly increased DOPA accumulation in the forebrain of reserpinised mice, reduced 5-HTP accumulation at the highest dose and exhibited a weaker inhibition of 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyl-tryptamine-induced head twitches. Aripiprazole did not inhibit physostigmine- or norepinephrine-induced lethality in rats. In conclusion, aripiprazole shows a favourable preclinical efficacy and side-effect profile compared to a typical antipsychotics. This profile may result from its high affinity partial agonist activity at D2 and 5-HT1A receptors and its antagonism of 5-HT2A receptors.

Neuropsychological and conditioned blocking performance in patients with schizophrenia: assessment of the contribution of neuroleptic dose, serum levels and dopamine D2-receptor occupancy

Patients with schizophrenia show impairments of attention and neuropsychological performance, but the extent to which this is attributable to antipsychotic medication remains largely unexplored. We describe here the putative influence of the dose of antipsychotic medication (chlorpromazine equivalents, CPZ), the antipsychotic serum concentration of dopamine (DA) D2-blocking activity and the approximated central dopamine D2-receptor occupancy (DA D2-occupancy), on conditioned blocking (CB) measures of attention and performance on a neuropsychological battery, in 108 patients with schizophrenia (compared with 62 healthy controls). Antipsychotic serum concentration and D2-occupancy were higher in patients with a paranoid versus non-paranoid diagnosis, and in female versus male patients (independent of symptom severity). Controlling for D2-occupancy removed the difference between high CB in paranoid and impaired low CB in non-paranoid patients. Similar partial correlations for antipsychotic drug dose and serum levels of DA D2-blocking activity with performance of the trail-making and picture completion tests (negative) and the block-design task (positive) showed the functional importance of DA-related activity. High estimates of central DA D2-occupancy were related to impaired verbal fluency but were associated with improved recall of stories, especially in paranoid patients. This, the first study of its kind, tentatively imputes a role for DA D2-related activity in left frontal (e.g. CB, verbal fluency) and temporal lobe functions (verbal recall) as well as in some non-verbal abilities mediated more in the right hemisphere in patients with schizophrenia.

Pharmacological and molecular targets in the search for novel antipsychotics

The recent enthusiasm among clinicians for the so-called 'atypical antipsychotics' has both improved treatment for schizophrenic patients and provided a welcome stimulus for basic research on antipsychotic mechanisms. Even the newer drugs have shortcomings, and research is underway aimed at identifying novel agents with greater efficacy and safety. Much of this effort is directed towards compounds which, in addition to blocking dopamine receptors, also act on other neurotransmitter receptors such as 5-HT2, 5-HT1A and alpha2-adrenergic receptors. However, there is also a large amount of scientific activity seeking to discover and develop selective dopamine receptor subtype antagonists (including compounds which specifically block D3 or D4 receptors) or drugs that specifically target the dopamine autoreceptor. Finally, a number of drug development programmes are searching for non-dopaminergic antipsychotics. Drugs that do not have affinity for dopamine receptors but act through neurotensin, sigma or cannabinoid CB1 receptors or glutamatergic mechanisms are currently being evaluated. If any of these agents prove to have clinical efficacy this may lead to a third generation of antipsychotics. It is likely, however, that the mechanisms of action of such drugs will nevertheless imply the intimate involvement of dopaminergic pathways.

Are animal studies of antipsychotics appropriately dosed? Lessons from the bedside to the bench

Animal models are crucial for understanding the mechanism of action of antipsychotics. However, the dose of an antipsychotic in animal studies is often arbitrarily chosen, with haloperidol 1 mg/kg being a rather common standard. Recent clinical positron emission tomography (PET) studies in patients show all antipsychotics to block dopamine D2 receptors, and most are effective at doses that lead to 60% to 80% D2 occupancy. When occupancy exceeds 80%, the incidence of side effects rises sharply. To use this "bedside" information to inform the "bench," we measured D2 occupancy in rats using a method similar in principle to the [11C]-raclopride PET method in humans. We found that: 1) as in humans, haloperidol is effective in animal models of antipsychotic action when D2 occupancy > 70% and leads to effects in models of extrapyramidal side effects when D2 occupancy is > 80%; 2) very low doses, 0.06 mg/kg/sc, cause acute D2 occupancy of 75%; 3) and even doses that acutely saturate D2 receptors give little D2 occupancy after 24 hours due to the very short half-life of haloperidol in rats (2.5 hours versus 24 hours in humans). We conclude that most previous animal studies of antipsychotics have used doses giving rise to inappropriately high acute D2 occupancy and inappropriately low D2 occupancy between doses. We exemplify how this dosing confounder could lead to inappropriate conclusions. Data from the bedside translated to the bench--using D2 occupancy as a mediating variable--will lead to more valid animal models.

Dopamine D2 receptor occupancy by olanzapine or risperidone in young patients with schizophrenia

A crucial characteristic of antipsychotic medication is the occupancy of the dopamine (DA) D2 receptor. We assessed striatal DA D2 receptor occupancy by olanzapine and risperidone in 36 young patients [31 males, 5 females; mean age 21.1 years (16-28)] with first episode schizophrenia, using [123I]iodobenzamide (IBZM) SPECT. The occupancy of DA D2 receptors was not significantly different between olanzapine and risperidone. However, in subgroups of most prescribed doses, DA D2 occupancy was higher in the risperidone 4-mg group (79%) compared to the olanzapine 15-mg group (62%). [123I]IBZM binding ratios decreased with olanzapine dose (r = -0.551; P < 0.01), indicating higher DA D2 receptor occupancy with higher olanzapine dose. Akathisia and positive symptoms were correlated with [123I]IBZM binding ratio (r = -0.442; P < 0.01; and r = -0.360; P < 0.05, respectively). Prolactin (PRL) levels were elevated in the risperidone, but not in the olanzapine group, at comparable D2 receptor occupancy levels. In the olanzapine group, PRL levels were correlated with [123I]IBZM binding ratio (r = -0.551; P < 0.01). In conclusion, both olanzapine and risperidone induce a high striatal D2 receptor occupancy, dependent on dose and group formation. The lower incidence of prolactin elevation with olanzapine, compared to risperidone, may not be attributed to a lower D2 receptor occupancy.

N-[11C]methylspiperone PET, in contrast to [11C]raclopride, fails to detect D2 receptor occupancy by an atypical neuroleptic

The occupancy of the atypical neuroleptic quetiapine (Seroquel) at the D2 dopamine receptor was investigated using the PET tracers [11C]raclopride and N-[11C]methylspiperone in a group of five schizophrenic patients. A steady-state treatment condition was ensured by dosing the patients with 750 mg quetiapine daily during 3 weeks followed by a period of tapering off the dose. For each patient, PET examinations were performed with both tracers at two of the following doses: 750, 450, 300 and/or 150 mg. As control, a group of six healthy untreated volunteers was investigated. The D2 binding potential in the putamen and the caudate nucleus was determined by using an evaluation method based on the method proposed by Patlak and Blasberg. The receptor occupancy was determined by assuming that the group of healthy volunteers is representative of untreated drug-naive schizophrenic patients. While a significant linear trend of increasing occupancy with increasing quetiapine dose (reaching 51% +/- 10% occupancy at the 750 mg dose) was detected with [11C]raclopride (P < 0.01), no such trend was apparent for N-[11C]methylspiperone (P > 0.09, maximal occupancy values were 2% +/- 3%, measured for the group of three patients on 450 mg). The study suggests that N-[11C]methylspiperone cannot be used for the assessment of D2 receptor occupancy induced by quetiapine. The result is discussed in terms of endogenous dopamine, tracer kinetics and equilibrium dissociation constants.

The cerebral cortex: a case for a common site of action of antipsychotics

Recent evidence from studies of receptor occupancy and regulation in post-mortem brains of patients with neuropsychiatric disorders and in non-human primates is providing new leads in the ongoing quest to understand the pathophysiology and causes of schizophrenia and to develop more effective methods of treatment. These studies suggest that the cerebral cortex may harbour the elusive common sites of action of antipsychotic medications and indicate that chronic treatment with these drugs differentially regulates both families of dopamine receptors in this structure. Upregulation of the cortical dopamine D2 receptors is accompanied by a downregulation of the D1 sites. Balancing the opposing actions of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor regulation may hold the key to optimal drug therapy and to understanding the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. In this article, Michael Lidow, Graham Williams and Patricia Goldman-Rakic review the evidence supporting the cerebral cortex as a pivotal site for these mechanisms underlying the action of antipsychotics.