Melatonin synthesis in the greenfrog retina in culture: II. Dopaminergic and adrenergic control

Circadian clock organization in the retina: From clock components to rod and cone pathways and visual function

Circadian (24-h) clocks are cell-autonomous biological oscillators that orchestrate many aspects of our physiology on a daily basis. Numerous circadian rhythms in mammalian and non-mammalian retinas have been observed and the presence of an endogenous circadian clock has been demonstrated. However, how the clock and associated rhythms assemble into pathways that support and control retina function remains largely unknown. Our goal here is to review the current status of our knowledge and evaluate recent advances. We describe many previously-observed retinal rhythms, including circadian rhythms of morphology, biochemistry, physiology, and gene expression. We evaluate evidence concerning the location and molecular machinery of the retinal circadian clock, as well as consider findings that suggest the presence of multiple clocks. Our primary focus though is to describe in depth circadian rhythms in the light responses of retinal neurons with an emphasis on clock control of rod and cone pathways. We examine evidence that specific biochemical mechanisms produce these daily light response changes. We also discuss evidence for the presence of multiple circadian retinal pathways involving rhythms in neurotransmitter activity, transmitter receptors, metabolism, and pH. We focus on distinct actions of two dopamine receptor systems in the outer retina, a dopamine D4 receptor system that mediates circadian control of rod/cone gap junction coupling and a dopamine D1 receptor system that mediates non-circadian, light/dark adaptive regulation of gap junction coupling between horizontal cells. Finally, we evaluate the role of circadian rhythmicity in retinal degeneration and suggest future directions for the field of retinal circadian biology.

Pharmacological characterization of the D1- and D2-like dopamine receptors from the brain of the leopard frog, Rana pipiens

The pharmacological profiles of D1- and D2-like dopamine receptors were investigated for native brain receptors in the leopard frog, Rana pipiens, using direct binding assays, which characterize functional receptors rather than assess total receptor protein. We used homogenate assays of R. pipiens fore- and midbrains to determine, via saturation isotherms, that the dissociation constant, Kd, for (3)H-SCH-23390 binding to the D1-like receptors was 0.29 nM, and the maximal receptor density, Bmax, was 40 fmoles/mg protein. This compares with the more than 10-fold higher density of D1 sites in rat striatum. Specific binding for the D2-like receptors was measurable using these methods with (3)H-spiperone as the ligand. However, saturation of binding was not achieved. This contrasts with the > 400 fmoles/mg protein Bmax in rat striatum. Pharmacological profiles (rank order of potency of displacing drugs) for each receptor type were determined. We used non-radioactive SCH-23390, SKF-38393, sulpiride, and spiperone to displace (3)H-SCH-23390 and (3)H-spiperone at D1 and D2 receptors, respectively. Parallel displacement assays were performed with rat striatal controls. Results indicated that the relative rank order displacements in anuran dopamine receptors were characteristic of D1- and D2-like receptors. However, the rank orders were not identical to those in mammals. The rank order for affinity at D1-like receptors in both rats and frogs was SCH-23390 > SKF-38393 > spiperone > sulpiride. The rank order for affinity at D2-like receptors was spiperone > SCH-23390 > sulpiride > SKF-38393 in frogs, and spiperone > sulpiride > SCH-23390 > SKF-38393 in rats. SKF-38393 and spiperone had similar affinities for the 'D1' receptors in both species. SCH-23390 had a slightly lower affinity for the D1-like receptors in Rana, whereas sulpiride had a significantly lower affinity for Rana D1-like receptors compared to rat D1 receptors. In Rana D2-like receptors, spiperone and sulpiride were significantly less potent compared to rat. However, SCH-23390 and SKF-38393 were equally potent for the D2-like receptors in both species. The results indicate that amphibian brain dopamine receptors fall into two classes similar to the mammalian D1 and D2 subfamilies, but with binding characteristics slightly different from those typically described in mammals. This work represents the first pharmacological characterization of native brain dopaminergic receptors in an anuran amphibian. Because direct binding assays measure the initial aspect of the functional interaction between transmitter and receptor, these data provide an important complement to studies using cell expression systems.