Carotid endarterectomy: a little more light at the end of the tunnel

Outpatient management of the chronically anticoagulated patient for elective surgery

With the appropriate use of preadmission clinics, "hospital in the home" programs, and alternatives to intravenous heparin, the majority of chronically anticoagulated patients can be managed as outpatients prior to elective surgery. The preoperative management depends on the original indication for long-term anticoagulation, the interval since the last thromboembolic event, and the extent and type of surgery planned. Only patients who are undergoing major surgery, and who have a high risk of recurrent thrombosis or embolism, require preoperative admission to hospital and conversion to an intravenous heparin regimen. Patients undergoing minor surgery may require no change to their oral anticoagulation. The remainder require cessation of oral anticoagulation and alternative thromboprophylaxis preoperatively, which can be achieved on an outpatient basis using low molecular weight heparin. Outpatient anticoagulation management requires a clear protocol that is understood and agreed to by all parties involved in the care of surgical patients perioperatively.

Outcome after carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the long-term outcome in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) among those treated with carotid endarterectomy (CE) or medical therapy.

BACKGROUND

Until randomized trials are completed, treatment of ACS will depend on identification of subgroups likely to benefit from CE.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was done on 215 patients with ACS: 107 underwent CE, and 108 were treated medically (MED). A neurologist reviewed medical records and performed a telephone interview to detect outcome (stroke and death). Mean follow-up was 3.8 years; only 4% were lost to follow-up.

RESULTS

Among CE patients, there was a 4.7% risk of postoperative ipsilateral stroke within 30 days. Four of five postoperative strokes occurred among patients with prior contralateral symptoms. There was no significant difference between CE and MED in the cumulative life-table 5-year risk of ipsilateral stroke, any stroke, or survival free of any stroke. Among diabetics, however, there were no ipsilateral strokes at 5 years after CE compared to 20% in MED (p = 0.03). Excluding postoperative complications, the 5-year risk of ipsilateral stroke was reduced among CE patients who "ever smoked" (CE 1%, MED 8%, p = 0.03) and the 5-year risk of any stroke was reduced among CE patients who had no prior myocardial infarction (CE 6%, MED 16%, p = 0.02). Among those with prior contralateral carotid territory symptoms, the 5-year risk of any stroke was worse in the MED patients (CE 5% MED 32%, p = 0.004). Among CE patients, a Cox proportional hazards model determined that the independent predictors of worse long-term outcome were: a history of myocardial infarction; admission systolic blood pressure greater than 160 mm Hg; and age greater than 65.

CONCLUSION

The approach to patients with ACS will await completion of large, randomized clinical trials, now in progress. Even if these studies are negative, there may remain specific subgroups of patients who show clear benefit from carotid endarterectomy.