Low-molecular-weight heparin

Safe and effective thrombolysis in free flap salvage: Intra-arterial urokinase infusion

Despite the high success rate in reconstruction using free tissue transfer, flap failure is often caused by microvascular thrombosis. In a small percentage of cases with complete flap loss, a salvage procedure is performed. In the present study, the effectiveness of intra-arterial urokinase infusion through the free flap tissue was investigated to develop a protocol to prevent thrombotic failure. The retrospective study evaluated the medical records of patients who underwent salvage procedure with intra-arterial urokinase infusion after reconstruction with free flap transfer between January 2013 and July 2019. Thrombolysis with urokinase infusion was administered as salvage treatment for patients who experienced flap compromise more than 24 hours after free flap surgery. Because of an external venous drainage through the resected vein, 100,000 IU of urokinase was infused into the arterial pedicle only into the flap circulation. A total of 16 patients was included in the present study. The mean time to re-exploration was 45.4 hours (range: 24-88 hours), and the mean quantity of infused urokinase was 69,688 IU (range: 30,000-100,000 IU). 5 cases presented with both arterial and venous thrombosis, while 10 cases had only venous thrombosis and 1 case had only arterial thrombosis; in a study of 16 patients undergoing flap surgery, 11 flaps were found to have survived completely, while 2 flaps experienced transient partial necrosis and 3 were lost despite salvage efforts. In other word, 81.3% (13 of 16) of flaps survived. Systemic complications, including gastrointestinal bleeding, hematemesis, and hemorrhagic stroke, were not observed. The free flap can be effectively and safely salvaged without systemic hemorrhagic complications using high-dose intra-arterial urokinase infusion within a short period of time without systemic circulation, even in delayed salvage cases. Urokinase infusion results in successful salvage and low rate of fat necrosis.

Anticoagulation Strategies during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Narrative Review

The development of extracorporeal life support technology has added a new dimension to the care of critically ill patients who fail conventional treatment options. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)—specialized temporary life support for patients with severe cardiac or pulmonary failure—plays a role in bridging the time for organ recovery, transplant, or permanent assistance. The overall patient outcome is dependent on the underlying disease, comorbidities, patient reaction to critical illness, and potential adverse events during ECMO. Moreover, the contact of the blood with the large artificial surface of an extracorporeal system circuit triggers complex inflammatory and coagulation responses. These processes may further lead to endothelial injury and disrupted microcirculation with consequent end-organ dysfunction and the development of adverse events like thromboembolism. Therefore, systemic anticoagulation is considered crucial to alleviate the risk of thrombosis and failure of ECMO circuit components. The gold standard and most used anticoagulant during extracorporeal life support is unfractionated heparin, with all its benefits and disadvantages. However, therapeutic anticoagulation of a critically ill patient carries the risk of clinically relevant bleeding with the potential for permanent injury or death. Similarly, thrombotic events may occur. Therefore, different anticoagulation strategies are employed, while the monitoring and the balance of procoagulant and anticoagulatory factors is of immense importance. This narrative review summarizes the most recent considerations on anticoagulation during ECMO support, with a special focus on anticoagulation monitoring and future directions.

Low molecular weight heparin for prevention of microvascular occlusion in digital replantation

BACKGROUND

The success of digital replantation is highly dependent on the patency of the repaired vessels after microvascular anastomosis. Antithrombotic agents are frequently used for preventing vascular occlusion. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been reported to be as effective as unfractionated heparin (UFH) in peripheral vascular surgery, but with fewer adverse effects. Its benefit in microvascular surgery such as digital replantation is unclear. This is an update of the review first published in 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To assess if treatment with subcutaneous LMWH improves the salvage rate of the digits in patients with digital replantation after traumatic amputation.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, AMED and CINAHL databases, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers, to 17 March 2020. The authors searched PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Chinese Electronic Periodical Services (CEPS) on 17 March 2020 and sought additional trials from reference lists of relevant publications.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing treatment with LMWH versus any other treatment in participants who received digital replantation following traumatic digital amputation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors (PL, CC) independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included trials using Cochrane's 'Risk of bias' tool. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included two new randomised trials in this update, bringing the total number of included trials to four. They included a total of 258 participants, with at least 273 digits, from hospitals in China. Three studies compared LMWH versus UFH, and one compared LMWH versus no LMWH. The mean age of participants ranged from 24.5 to 37.6 years. In the studies reporting the sex of participants, there were a total of 145 men and 59 women. The certainty of the evidence was downgraded to low or very low because all studies were at high risk of performance or reporting bias (or both) and there was imprecision in the results due to the small numbers of participants. The three studies comparing LMWH versus UFH reported the success rate of replantation using different units of analysis (participant or digit), so we were unable to combine data from all three studies (one study reported results for both participants and digits). No evidence of a benefit in success of replantation was seen in the LMWH group when compared with UFH, regardless of whether the outcomes were reported by number of participants (risk ratio (RR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.10; 130 participants, 2 studies; very low-certainty evidence); or by number of digits (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.04; 200 digits, 2 studies; low-certainty evidence). No studies reported the incidence of compromised microcirculation requiring surgical or non-surgical therapy, or any systemic/other causes of microvascular insufficiency. There was no evidence of a clear difference between the LMWH and UFH groups in occurrence of arterial occlusion (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.16 to 7.10; 54 participants, 1 study; very low-certainty evidence) or venous occlusion (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.20 to 3.27; 54 participants, 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). Two studies reported adverse effects. The LMWH and UFH groups showed no evidence of a difference in wound bleeding (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.23; 130 participants, 2 studies; low-certainty evidence), haematuria (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.09 to 2.11; 130 participants, 2 studies; very low-certainty evidence), ecchymoses (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.21 to 3.19; 130 participants, 2 studies; very low-certainty evidence), epistaxis (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.32; 130 participants, 2 studies; very low-certainty evidence), gingival bleeding (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.43; 130 participants, 2 studies; very low-certainty evidence), and faecal occult blood (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.31; 130 participants, 2 studies; very low-certainty evidence). We could not pool data on coagulation abnormalities as varying definitions and tests were used in the three studies. One study compared LMWH versus no LMWH. The success rate of replantation, when analysed by digits, was reported as 91.2% success in the LMWH group and 82.1% in the control group (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.33; 73 digits, 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). Compromised microcirculation requiring surgical re-exploration, analysed by digits, was 11.8% in the LMWH group and 17.9% in the control group (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.21 to 3.58; 73 digits, 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). Compromised microcirculation requiring incision occurred in five out of 34 digits (14.7%) in the LMWH group and eight out of 39 digits (20.5%) in the control group (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.98; 73 digits; very low-certainty evidence). Microvascular insufficiency due to arterial occlusion, analysed by digits, was 11.8% in the LMWH group and 17.9% in the control group (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.21 to 2.05; 73 digits, 1 study; very low-certainty evidence), and venous occlusion was 14.7% in the LMWH group and 20.5% in the control (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.98; 73 digits, 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). The study did not report complications or adverse effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is currently low to very low-certainty evidence, based on four RCTs, suggesting no evidence of a benefit from LMWH when compared to UFH on the success rates of replantation or affect microvascular insufficiency due to vessel occlusion (analysed by digit or participant). LMWH had similar success rates of replantation; and the incidence rate of venous and arterial microvascular insufficiency showed no evidence of a difference between groups when LMWH was compared to no LMWH (analysed by digit). Similar rates of complications and adverse effects were seen between UFH and LMWH. There was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions on any effect on coagulation when comparing LMWH to UFH or no LMWH. The certainty of the evidence was downgraded due to performance and reporting bias, as well as imprecision in the results. Further adequately powered studies are warranted to provide high-certainty evidence.

Appropriate Use of Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin after Digital Replantation: A Randomized Controlled Trial Involving Three Groups

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to clarify the appropriate use of unfractionated heparin as an anticoagulation agent after digital replantation.

METHODS

This study was a prospective, randomized, single-blind, blinded-endpoint method, three-arm, parallel-group, controlled clinical trial conducted at a single institution. A total of 88 patients (101 fingers) following digital amputation and subsequent repair by anastomosis of both arteries and veins were randomly allocated into three groups: (1) control group (no heparin dose), (2) low-dose heparin group (10,000 IU/day), and (3) high-dose heparin group (start at 15,000 IU/day, then adjust the dose to achieve an activated partial thromboplastin time of 1.5 to 2.5 times the baseline). The outcomes were assessed regarding the proportion of success at 2 weeks after replantation of amputated digits, total or partial necrosis, and occurrence of complications.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found among the three groups, except for complications of congestion. The odds ratio of the heparin group compared with the control group for a success proportion was 5.40 (95 percent CI, 0.85 to 34.20; p = 0.027) in subjects aged 50 years or older. Significant elevations of activated partial thromboplastin time, aspartate transaminase, and alanine aminotransferase occurred in high-dose heparin groups on day 7.

CONCLUSION

Unfractionated heparin administration is considered effective for patients aged 50 years or older, although the routine use of unfractionated heparin is not necessary after digital replantation.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

Permanent Cardiac Pacemaker: an Emergency Perspective

The number of patients with permanent pacemaker are increasing and may present into the emergency department with a variety of complications and malfunctions. The presence of a pacemaker may also affect management of unrelated medical issues. This article review the complications of the implant procedure, the causes, diagnosis and management of pacemaker malfunction, the pacemaker syndrome, Twiddler's syndrome. Interaction of permanent pacemaker with other medical condition and its implication in Emergency Department environment are also discussed.

Low molecular weight heparin relieves experimental colitis in mice by downregulating IL-1β and inhibiting syndecan-1 shedding in the intestinal mucosa

Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) exhibits anti-inflammatory properties, but its effect on inflammation in colitis remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effects of LMWH on dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in mice, in which acute colitis progresses to chronic colitis, and to explore the potential mechanism involved in this process. C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into control, DSS, and DSS plus LMWH groups (n = 18). Disease activity was scored by a disease activity index (DAI). Histological changes were evaluated by hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. The mRNA levels of syndecan-1, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-10 were determined by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Protein expression of syndecan-1 was detected by immunohistochemistry. The serum syndecan-1 level was examined by a dot immunobinding assay. LMWH ameliorated the disease activity of colitis induced by DSS administration in mice. Colon destruction with the appearance of crypt damage, goblet cell loss, and a larger ulcer was found on day 12 after DSS administration, which was greatly relieved by the treatment of LMWH. LMWH upregulated syndecan-1 expression in the intestinal mucosa and reduced the serum syndecan-1 level on days 12 and 20 after DSS administration (P<0.05 vs. DSS group). In addition, LMWH significantly decreased the expression of both IL-1β and IL-10 mRNA on days 12 and 20 (P<0.05 vs. DSS group). LMWH has therapeutic effects on colitis by downregulating inflammatory cytokines and inhibiting syndecan-1 shedding in the intestinal mucosa.

Low molecular weight heparin for prevention of microvascular occlusion in digital replantation

BACKGROUND

The success of digital replantation is highly dependent on the patency of the repaired vessels after microvascular anastomosis. Antithrombotic agents are frequently used for preventing vascular occlusion. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been reported to be as effective as unfractionated heparin (UFH) in peripheral vascular surgery, but with fewer adverse effects. Its benefit in microvascular surgery such as digital replantation is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether subcutaneous LMWH treatment improves the salvage rate of the digits in patients with digital replantation after traumatic amputation.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator (TSC) searched the Specialised Register (October 2012), CENTRAL (2012, Issue 10) and trials databases. In addition, the authors searched PubMed, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) and CEPS (Chinese Electronic Periodical Services), and sought additional trials from reference lists of relevant publications.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials of LMWH in patients who received digital replantation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included trials. Disagreements were resolved by discussion.

MAIN RESULTS

Two randomised trials involving 114 patients with at least 122 replanted digits met the inclusion criteria and were included. Both trials compared the efficacy and safety of LMWH with UFH. We found no trials comparing LMWH with placebo or other anticoagulants. The data from the two included studies were insufficient for meta-analysis. The overall success rate of replantation did not differ between the LMWH and UFH groups, 92.3% versus 89.2% in one trial (risk ratio (RR) 1.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.22) and 94.3% versus 94.15% in the other trial (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.13). The incidence of both postoperative arterial and venous insufficiency were reported in one trial and did not significantly differ between the LMWH and UFH groups (RR 1.08; 95% CI 0.16 to 7.10 and RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.20 to 3.27, respectively). Direct and indirect causes of microvascular insufficiency were not reported in the trials. Different methods were used to monitor the adverse effects related to anticoagulation in the two trials. Bleeding tendency was monitored for the LMWH and UFH groups in one trial and was reported by the incidence of wound haemorrhage (11.5% versus 17.9%; RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.17 to 2.44), ecchymoses (3.8% versus 10.7%; RR 0.36; 95% CI 0.04 to 3.24), haematuria (3.8% versus 7.1%; RR 0.54; 95% CI 0.05 to 5.59), nasal bleeding (0% versus 7.1%; RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.01 to 4.28), gingival bleeding (0% versus 10.7%; RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.83) and faecal occult blood (0% versus 3.6%; RR 0.36; 95% CI 0.02 to 8.42). The bleeding tendency was increased in the UFH group but this was not statistically significant. This trial also monitored coagulability changes using parameters such as antithrombin activity, factor Xa activity, bleeding time, clotting time and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). No comparison was made between the LMWH and UFH groups but all data consistently showed that coagulability was reduced more in the UFH group than in the LMWH group. The other trial reported a postoperative decrease in platelet count in the UFH group (preoperative 278.4 ± 18.7 x 10(9)/L, postoperative 194.3 ± 26.5 x 10(9)/L; P < 0.05) but not in the LMWH group (preoperative 260.8 ± 32.5 x 10(9)/L, postoperative 252.4 ± 29.1 x 10(9)/L; P > 0.05).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Current limited evidence based on two small-scaled low-to-medium quality randomised trials found no differences in the success rate of replantation between LMWH and UFH, but a lower risk of postoperative bleeding and hypocoagulability after the use of LMWH. Further well-designed and adequately powered clinical trials are warranted.

Tinzaparin sodium: a review of its use in the prevention and treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and in the prevention of clotting in the extracorporeal circuit during haemodialysis

Tinzaparin sodium (Innohep) is a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) that is effective in the prevention and treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE), and in maintaining the patency of haemodialysis circuits in adult patients. In terms of preventing DVT and/or PE, therapy with subcutaneous tinzaparin sodium was more effective than oral warfarin and equivalent to subcutaneous enoxaparin sodium in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery, and did not significantly differ from that of subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients undergoing general surgery. In the initial therapy of adult patients with DVT and/or PE, subcutaneous tinzaparin sodium was at least as effective as intravenous UFH and did not significantly differ from subcutaneous dalteparin sodium. Various other studies have demonstrated that the long-term efficacy of subcutaneous tinzaparin sodium in the treatment of patients with DVT and/or PE was sustained for a total period of up to 12 months. Tinzaparin sodium was also demonstrated to be effective in maintaining the patency of haemodialysis circuits in adult patients with end-stage renal failure. In clinical studies, tinzaparin sodium was generally well tolerated in the prevention and treatment of DVT and/or PE in adult patients, including in elderly patients, and in patients undergoing haemodialysis. As expected, bleeding complications were the most frequently occurring adverse event. Thus, available data indicate that tinzaparin sodium is a useful option in the prevention and treatment of DVT and/or PE, and in maintaining the patency of haemodialysis circuits in adult patients.

The monitoring of heparin induced thrombocytopenia following surgery: an audit and international survey

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious postoperative complication of low-molecular-weight heparin (LWMH) prescribed following surgery and recent evidence based guidelines recommend routine platelet count monitoring for all at-risk patients. With the implementation of these guidelines this clinical study demonstrated a significant improvement (2-56% p < 0.05) in HIT diagnosis in postoperative patients receiving LMWH. An international survey showed a lack of awareness of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and its management.

Monitoring and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Low molecular weight heparins have been used to reduce thromboembolic risk for at least 20 years, but their use is not without risk. This article considers the incidence, monitoring, treatment and lack of insight about heparin-induced thrombocytopenia - a potentially fatal complication of low molecular weight heparin use.

Anticoagulation therapy in microsurgery: a review

The advent of microsurgical tissue transfer including replantation greatly has expanded the scope of reconstructive surgery. There are few recent innovations in anticoagulation therapies for microsurgery, however, and anastomotic thrombosis remains an occasional cause of surgical failure. No consensus exists on the ideal anticoagulation protocol for microsurgery. This article reviews major pharmacologic modalities of anticoagulation, delineates the mechanism of action and study of efficacy of each agent, and compares the risks and benefits of popular anticoagulation therapies. Finally, it examines available human outcomes-based data and attempts to provide a glimpse of the future direction of microsurgical anticoagulation research.

Tinzaparin sodium: a review of its pharmacology and clinical use in the prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disease

Tinzaparin sodium (tinzaparin; innohep) is a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) formed by the enzymatic degradation of porcine unfractionated heparin (UFH). In clinical trials, once-daily subcutaneous (SC) tinzaparin was effective and generally well tolerated in the prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disease. SC tinzaparin 75 anti-Xa IU/kg/day showed similar thromboprophylactic efficacy to adjusted-dosage oral warfarin in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty; in patients undergoing knee replacement, the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was significantly lower with tinzaparin. The drug had similar efficacy to equivalent-dosage SC enoxaparin sodium in orthopaedic surgery. In patients undergoing general surgery, SC tinzaparin 3500 anti-Xa IU/day was of equivalent thromboprophylactic efficacy to SC UFH 5000IU twice daily. Encouraging preliminary results have been obtained with tinzaparin in the prevention of DVT in patients with complete motor paralysis. In the initial treatment of acute proximal DVT and pulmonary embolism, SC tinzaparin 175 anti-Xa IU/kg/day was at least as effective as adjusted-dosage intravenous (IV) UFH. In the outpatient treatment of venous thromboembolism, tinzaparin has demonstrated similar efficacy to dalteparin sodium (dalteparin) and warfarin. Tinzaparin was effective in preventing clotting in haemodialysis circuits; the anticoagulant efficacy of tinzaparin in patients undergoing haemodialysis was similar to that of SC dalteparin and similar to or less than (although in this case the tinzaparin dose was too low for sufficient anticoagulant efficacy) that of IV UFH. Advantages of tinzaparin over UFH and warfarin include ease of administration and lack of need for laboratory monitoring. Tinzaparin is more cost effective than UFH in the treatment of established thromboembolic disease, and home-based treatment with tinzaparin may offer greater cost benefits than hospital-based therapy. Tinzaparin is well tolerated, including in elderly patients and those with renal impairment receiving long-term treatment. Incidences of major bleeding complications were low and reports of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia were infrequent in clinical studies. In conclusion, tinzaparin is a valuable LMWH in the prophylaxis and management of thromboembolic disease.

Low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) effectively prevents thrombosis in a rat model of deep arterial injury

Unfractionated heparin is often used to prevent thrombosis in microvascular surgery, but a major drawback of heparin therapy is increased bleeding. Low-molecular-weight heparins prevent venous thrombosis as effectively as heparin and have better bioavailability and a longer plasma half-life, which explains the increased use of low-molecular-weight heparins as substitutes for heparin in clinical practice. However, the ability of low-molecular-weight heparins to prevent arterial thrombosis has been debated. In this study, the authors compared the antithrombotic and antihemostatic effects of heparin and the low-molecular-weight heparin dalteparin in a rat model of arterial thrombosis. A segment of the left common carotid artery was isolated between vascular clamps and opened longitudinally. An endarterectomy was performed and the arteriotomy was closed with a running suture. The antithrombotic effect (vascular patency 31 minutes after reperfusion) and the surgical bleeding were measured. Groups of 10 rats were treated in a blind, random fashion with intravenous injection of one of the following substances 1 minute before clamp release. Three groups received a bolus of heparin (20, 60, or 180 IU anti-factor Xa/kg), three groups received dalteparin (60, 180, or 540 IU anti-factor Xa/kg), and one group was treated with vehicle (saline). Heparin 180 IU/kg produced a distinct antithrombotic effect compared with the control group (p = 0.03), but it also significantly increased the surgical bleeding to 2.0 g compared with 1.5 g in the control group (medians, p = 0.01). Dalteparin 180 and 540 IU/kg also produced a powerful antithrombotic effect (p = 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively). In contrast to heparin, 180 IU/kg dalteparin did not increase the surgical bleeding (median, 1.5 g; p = 0.37 versus controls). Dalteparin 540 IU/kg increased the median surgical bleeding to 2.6 g (p = 0.06 versus controls). The nonsignificant difference may be explained by the great interindividual variation of surgical bleeding in the high-dose dalteparin group. Dalteparin prevented arterial thrombosis as effectively as unfractionated heparin. In contrast to heparin, dalteparin did not increase the surgical bleeding, which indicates that dalteparin instead of heparin can be used to prevent thrombosis in microvascular surgery.

Dalteparin sodium treatment during resuscitation inhibits hemorrhagic shock-induced leukocyte rolling and adhesion in the mesenteric microcirculation

BACKGROUND

Ischemia/reperfusion-induced polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocyte (PMN) adhesion and extravasation are pivotal for the development of postinjury multiple organ failure. We hypothesized that the deleterious microcirculatory consequences of hemorrhagic shock (HS) could be altered by low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) therapy. Our aim was to investigate the effects of dalteparin sodium on leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions when LMWH treatment was initiated before HS or during resuscitation.

METHODS

Anesthetized dogs underwent HS (40 mm Hg mean arterial pressure for 60 minutes) and resuscitation either with shed blood or with lactated Ringer's (LR) solution. LMWH or conventional heparin sodium pretreatment was administered subcutaneously before hemorrhage; or LMWH was given intravenously during resuscitation. Mesenteric postcapillary venules were observed by intravital video microscopy before and after HS, and 60 minutes, 120 minutes, and 180 minutes after resuscitation, and leukocyte rolling and firm adherence were determined.

RESULTS

HS significantly increased PMN rolling and adhesion in the mesenteric microcirculation. LMWH, but not heparin sodium pretreatment, significantly inhibited both primary and secondary interactions. LMWH treatment was also effective when initiated during resuscitation. LMWH exerted the same inhibitory effect regardless of the type of resuscitation.

CONCLUSION

LMWH treatment during resuscitation effectively inhibits PMN rolling and adhesion.

Dalteparin: an update of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disease

Dalteparin is a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) with a mean molecular weight of 5000. Compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH), the drug has markedly improved bioavailability and increased plasma elimination half-life, and exerts a greater inhibitory effect on plasma activity of coagulation factor Xa relative to its effects on other coagulation parameters. Dalteparin also has less lipolytic activity than UFH. Dalteparin 2500U once daily subcutaneously is of similar antithrombotic efficacy to UFH 5000IU twice daily, and 2 studies have shown superiority over UFH 2 or 3 times daily of dalteparin 5000U once daily in patients requiring surgical thromboprophylaxis. After total hip arthroplasty, dalteparin was superior to adjusted-dosage warfarin and was of greater thromboprophylactic efficacy when given for 35 than for 7 days. Intravenous or subcutaneous dalteparin is as effective as intravenous UFH when given once or twice daily in the initial management of established deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The drug is also effective in long term home treatment. Dalteparin has been shown to be effective in combination with aspirin in the management of unstable coronary artery disease (CAD), with composite end-point data from 1 study suggesting benefit for up to 3 months. Current data indicate potential of the drug in the management of acute myocardial infarction (MI). Dalteparin is also of similar efficacy to UFH, with a single bolus dose being sufficient in some patients, in the prevention of clotting in haemodialysis and haemofiltration circuits. Pharmacoeconomic data indicate that overall costs relative to UFH from a hospital perspective can be reduced through the use of dalteparin in patients receiving treatment for venous thromboembolism. Dalteparin has also been shown to be cost effective when used for surgical thromboprophylaxis. Overall, rates of haemorrhagic complications in patients receiving dalteparin are low and are similar to those seen with UFH.

CONCLUSIONS

Dalteparin is effective and well tolerated when given subcutaneously once daily in the prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disease. The simplicity of the administration regimens used and the lack of necessity for laboratory monitoring facilitate home or outpatient treatment and appear to translate into cost advantages from a hospital perspective over UFH or warfarin. Dalteparin also maintains the patency of haemodialysis and haemofiltration circuits, with beneficial effects on blood lipid profiles and the potential for prophylaxis with a single bolus injection in some patients. Data are also accumulating to show dalteparin to be an effective and easily administered alternative to UFH in patients with CAD.

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of enoxaparin and warfarin for prevention of deep vein thrombosis after total knee arthroplasty

Of 263 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty, 122 received adjusted low-dose warfarin and 141 received enoxaparin as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis. Three patients in the warfarin group and 3 in the enoxaparin group developed ultrasound-detectable DVT (P > .05). Although the amount of perioperative blood transfused was equivalent in both groups, the overall hemoglobin drop was greater (P < .005) in the enoxaparin group (2.9 g/dL) as compared with the warfarin group (2.3 g/dL). Five patients (4.6%) in the warfarin group and 16 (11.3%) in the enoxaparin group had bleeding complications (P < .05). Our data support earlier published reports suggesting that reductions, if any, in the incidence of DVT associated with enoxaparin are offset by a significant increase in bleeding complications as compared with adjusted-dose warfarin. We continue to use adjusted-dose warfarin as primary thromboembolic prophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty.

Permanent cardiac pacemakers: issues relevant to the emergency physician, Part I

Many people benefit from the implantation of cardiac pacemakers for management of certain cardiac dysrhythmias. These patients are seen regularly in the emergency department with a variety of pacemaker complications and malfunctions. The presence of a pacemaker may also affect management of unrelated medical problems. This two-part series reviews the medical issues related to patients with permanent pacemakers. Part I covers pacing modes and terminology, complications of the implant procedure, and the approach to a patient with a permanent pacemaker. Part II covers the causes, diagnosis and management of pacemaker malfunction; the pacemaker syndrome; the pacemaker Twiddler's syndrome; and other considerations in the paced patient including diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, ACLS protocols, trauma, and sources of interference. Indications for permanent pacemaker implantation and temporary external pacing will not be covered.

Skin necrosis secondary to low-molecular weight heparin in a patient with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome

Skin necrosis is a rare complication of subcutaneous heparin therapy that usually occurs at injection sites. It occasionally accompanies the heparin-associated thrombocytopenia and thrombosis syndrome. We describe a patient with the antiphospholipid syndrome who had skin necrosis develop from low-molecular weight heparin therapy at sites distant from injection sites.

Etiology and treatment of acquired coagulopathies in the critically ill adult and child

Excessive bleeding frequently complicates the care of critically ill patients. Except in the case of trauma or inpatients with known coagulopathies, the bleeding is generally not directly related to the illness that results in admission to the intensive care unit. In general, the causes of the bleeding can be divided into three categories: consumptive coagulopathies, bleeding related to "hepatic issues," and iatrogenic causes. In most circumstances, the pathogenesis and management of these acquired coagulopathies do not differ between the adult and child patient. However, some differences do exist in regards to the clinical manifestations and management of some consumptive coagulopathies. This article reviews the more common causes of bleeding in the critically ill patient and outlines diagnostic and treatment approaches for these patients. Particular emphasis will be placed on the differences in presentation and management where differences exist.

Topical application of low molecular weight heparin in a rabbit traumatic anastomosis model

Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are antithrombotic drugs composed of lower molecular weight components of heparin with an apparent molecular weight in the range of 4.0-8.0 KDA. These agents have been used clinically for several years. They have different mechanisms of action compared to heparin, a longer half-life and much higher bioavailability. Anticoagulant drugs such as heparin have been used topically in our previous studies to avoid bleeding complications observed with systemic administration. In this study, low molecular weight heparin (Certoparin, Sandoz) was topically administered in a rabbit ear arterial crush-avulsion thrombosis model and compared with heparin. The animals were divided into three groups: LMWH, heparin and saline control groups. In the LMWH group, the patency rate was 71% (10 of 14) at both 1 and 7 days. The patency rate in the heparin group was 95% (19 of 20) at 24 hrs and 80% (16 of 20) at 7 days. In the saline control group, the vessel patency rate was 17% at 24 hrs and 13% at 7 days. Clotting times such as ACT, PT and APTT performed on samples drawn one hour after drug administration were within the normal ranges for both the control and the treatment groups. The results suggest that topical administration of LMWH prevents the occurrence of thrombosis at the traumatic anastomosis site to a similar degree as heparin.

Antiphospholipid syndrome and the skin

The antiphospholipid syndrome is an acquired multisystem disorder of hypercoagulation, which may be primary or secondary to underlying diseases. Serologic markers for the syndrome are the lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies. Clinical features include recurrent thrombotic events (arterial or venous), repeated fetal loss, and thrombocytopenia. Cutaneous manifestations may occur as the first sign of antiphospholipid syndrome. These include livedo reticularis, necrotizing vasculitis, livedoid vasculitis, thrombophlebitis, cutaneous ulceration and necrosis, erythematous macules, purpura, ecchymoses, painful skin nodules, and subungual splinter hemorrhages. Antiphospholipid syndrome may also be associated rarely with anetoderma, discoid lupus erythematosus, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, or disorders that closely resemble Sneddon or Degos syndromes. Noninflammatory vascular thrombosis is the most frequent histopathologic feature observed. Prophylaxis and treatment of thrombosis in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome relies principally on anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents.

Post-stent management with a pneumatic groin compression device and self injected low molecular weight heparin

BACKGROUND

The benefits of intracoronary stent implantation are offset by an increased risk of complications at the arterial puncture site and a prolonged hospital stay. Much of this morbidity can be attributed to the generally perceived need to achieve systemic anticoagulation after stent implantation.

AIM

To test a simplified protocol for post-stent management using the Femostop pneumatic groin compression device and low molecular weight (fractionated) heparin (LMWH) administered by subcutaneous injection.

PATIENTS

A case series of 100 consecutive patients, with stable angina pectoris, undergoing coronary stenting for a suboptimal result after conventional balloon angioplasty.

METHODS

All patients were managed with a new post-stent protocol using the Femostop pneumatic groin compression device and LMWH. The incidence of complications and the length of hospital stay were recorded.

RESULTS

The clinical course was uncomplicated in 92 patients and their discharge from hospital was achieved on the first post-procedural day for 44 patients and on the second for the remaining 48. The rate of vascular or bleeding complications was 6%.

CONCLUSIONS

LMWH administered by subcutaneous injection may provide a practical and effective alternative to the use of intravenous heparin when systemic anticoagulation is used after stent implantation.