[Enterococcal infections in critically ill patients admitted to ICU]

Evaluation of a polymerase chain reaction assay for pathogen detection in septic patients under routine condition: an observational study

Background

Treatment of septic shock relies on appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Current culture based methods deliver final results after days, which may delay potentially lifesaving adjustments in antimicrobial therapy. This study was undertaken to compare PCR with blood culture results under routine conditions regarding 1. impact on antimicrobial therapy, and 2. time to result, in patients with presumed sepsis.

Methodology/Principal Findings

This was an observational study in a 50 beds ICU of a university hospital. In 245 patients with suspected sepsis, 311 concomitant blood cultures and blood for multiplex PCR (VYOO®) were obtained. 45 of 311 blood cultures (14.5%) and 94 of 311 PCRs (30.1%) were positive. However, blood culture or microbiological sampling from the presumed site of infection rarely confirmed PCR results and vice versa. Median time to positivity and interquartile range were 24.2 (18.0, 27.5) hours for the PCR and 68 (52.2, 88.5) hours for BC (p<0.01). PCR median time to result was dependent on technician availability (53.5 hours on Saturdays, 7.2 hours under optimal logistic conditions). PCR results showed good correlation with procalcitonin (p<0.001). In 34% of patients with positive PCRs antimicrobial therapy was considered inadequate according to assessment of clinical arbitrators including 5 patients with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), 3 cases with multiresistant staphylococci, and 4 patients with fungi.

Conclusions

The results of this observational study support the hypothesis that PCR results are available faster, are more frequently positive, and may result in earlier adjustment of antimicrobial therapy. However, shorter time to result can only be fully exploited when the laboratory is adequately staffed for a 24 hour/7 day service, or when point of care/automated assay systems become available.

Predictors and outcome associated with an Enterococcus positive isolate during intensive care unit admission

This study reports the incidence, risk factors and mortality associated with a positive Enterococcus spp. isolate during admission to two tertiary intensive care units participating in an antibiotic cycling study. Incidence was low, with only 4.2% of admissions (36/852) at Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital and 2.8% (31/1104) at Westmead Hospital developing a positive Enterococcus spp. isolate (P=0.087). A positive enterococcal isolate, while not an independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio [OR]=1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80 to 3.2, P=0.18), may be a marker of the underlying severity of illness with higher unadjusted in-hospital mortality (26% or 17/66 vs 14% or 250/1855, P=0.007). Independent risk factors for a positive isolate were use of meropenem/imipenem (OR=5.7, 95% CI 2.4 to 14, P <0.001) and cefepime (OR=2.5, 95% CI 1.2 to 5.3, P=0.017) within 48 hours of intensive care unit admission, the presence of a nasogastric tube (OR=4.1, 95% CI 1.3 to 14, P=0.018), renal replacement therapy (OR=2.2, 95% CI 1.0 to 4.7, P=0.046), operative intervention (OR=1.8, 95% CI 1.0 to 3.2, P=0.035) and age (OR=1.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.5, P=0.009). None of these factors, except for the need for renal replacement therapy (OR=6.2, 95% CI 1.4 to 27, P=0.015), was associated with increased mortality. Enterococci-directed empiric therapy in the treatment of sepsis remains of unproven value, although this negative finding must be evaluated against other higher powered studies.

Colonization by high-level aminoglycoside-resistant enterococci in intensive care unit patients: epidemiology and clinical relevance

A cohort study was performed to investigate the risk factors for colonization with high-level aminoglycoside-resistant enterococci (HLARE) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Colonization was investigated by performing surveillance samples during ICU stay. Clonal relatedness of the isolates was assessed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Eighty-six patients with an ICU stay of >48 h were included; two were colonized with HLARE at admission, and 24 (28.5%) acquired HLARE during their stay in the ICU. HLARE were initially isolated from rectal swabs alone. Thirty-five percent of Enterococcus faecalis and 57% of E. faecium showed high-level resistance to gentamicin or streptomycin. Most isolates were clonally unrelated. Using multi-variate analysis, the only variable associated with HLARE colonization was previous antimicrobial use. Five patients had HLARE isolated from clinical samples, three of them with infection; in all of these, colonization with the same clone had been detected previously by surveillance samples. We conclude that most infections due to HLARE in the ICU are preceded by previous colonization, and that antimicrobial use is the main risk factor for colonization.