Seguridad y eficacia del hierro intravenoso en la anemia aguda por fractura trocantérea de cadera en el anciano

Perioperative intravenous iron to treat patients with fractured hip surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Background

Treatment of preoperative anemia with intravenous iron is common within elective surgical care pathways. It is plausible that this treatment may improve care for people with hip fractures many of whom are anemic because of pre‐existing conditions, fractures, and surgery.

Objective

To review the evidence for intravenous iron administration on outcomes after hip fracture.

Design

We followed a predefined protocol and conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of the use of intravenous iron to treat anemia before and after emergency hip fracture surgery. The planned primary outcome was a difference in length of stay between those treated with intravenous iron and the control group. Other outcomes analyzed were 30‐day mortality, requirement for blood transfusion, changes in quality of life, and hemoglobin concentration on discharge from the hospital.

Data Sources

EMBASE, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library (CENTRAL, DARE) databases, Clinicaltrials.gov, and ISRCTN trial registries. Date of final search March 2022.

Eligibility Criteria

Adult patients undergoing urgent surgery for hip fracture. Studies considered patients who received intravenous iron and were compared with a control group.

Results

Four randomized controlled trials (RCT, 732 patients) and nine cohort studies (2986 patients) were included. The RCTs were at low risk of bias, and the nonrandomized studies were at moderate risk of bias. After metanalysis of the RCTs there was no significant difference in the primary outcome, length of hospital stay, between the control group and patients receiving intravenous iron (mean difference: −0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]; −1.20 to 0.03; I² = 30%, p = 0.23). Intravenous iron was not associated with a difference in 30‐day mortality (n = 732, OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.62−2.1; I² = 0%, p = 0.50), nor with the requirement for transfusion (n = 732, OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.63−1.14; I² = 0%, p < 0.01) in the analyzed RCTs. Functional outcomes and quality of life were variably reported in three studies.

Conclusion

The evidence on the use of intravenous iron in patients with hip fracture is low quality and shows no difference in length of acute hospital stay and transfusion requirements in this population. Improved large, multicentre, high‐quality studies with patient‐centered outcomes will be required to evaluate the clinical and cost‐effectiveness of this treatment.

Intravenous Iron May Improve Outcomes in Elderly Patients With Operative Hip Fractures

Introduction:

Hip fractures are common injuries with high morbidity and mortality rates. These patients often become anemic and require allogenic blood transfusion. Transfusions are costly with potential complications. This study examines the effect of intravenous (IV) iron on patients with hip fractures, undergoing surgery within 48 hours, and being treated with a highly restrictive transfusion protocol.

Materials and Methods:

A retrospective chart review performed on patients admitted to a level 1 tertiary care center with fractures of the proximal femur from December 2015 to December 2017 included 239 patients. Patients who received 300 mg of IV iron when their hemoglobin fell below 11 g/dL were compared to a control group of patients who never received IV iron with respect to transfusion rate, 30-day readmission rate, nosocomial infections, length of stay, and hospital costs.

Results:

There were no significant differences in transfusion rates (P = .118). There was a trend toward decreased length of stay (P = .063) and 30-day readmission rates (P = .051) with a 59% reduction in the odds of 30-day readmission when a patient received IV iron. There were no differences in nosocomial infection rates or cost of hospitalization.

Discussion:

This study presents a compelling argument for further research regarding the use of IV iron in elderly patients undergoing surgery for a hip fracture. Length of stay and transfusion rates are increased in patients with intertrochanteric fractures and undergoing intramedullary nailing. A higher number of these patients in the IV iron group may have falsely increased these rates. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial is needed to assess the true effects of perioperative IV iron.

Conclusions:

This study showed no significant benefit to IV iron use in elderly patients undergoing surgical treatment of hip fracture. The decrease in 30-day readmission rate should be further examined with a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Results of an anaemia treatment protocol complementary to blood transfusion in elderly patients with hip fracture

BACKGROUND

Anaemia is a very common condition in elderly patients with hip fracture. The side effects of blood transfusions are well known, and further research on potential alternative therapies is needed.

OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN

A non-controlled descriptive study, conducted on 138 patients admitted for hip fracture, aimed at analysing the effects of an anaemia treatment protocol adjunctive to transfusion, based on the use of supra-physiological doses of intravenous iron and erythropoietin (IS/EPOS). The variables collected were, medical history, physical and cognitive status prior to fracture, as well as the need of blood products, medical complications during admission and their functional outcome at three and six months after the fracture were evaluated. Transfusion rates were compared with a historical control group when the only treatment for acute anaemia was transfusion (2011).

RESULTS

Almost half (63, 48%) of the patients received blood transfusion, with (91,70%) IS/EPOD. Intravenous iron did not reduce the percentage of transfused patients (56% vs. 44%), but it did reduce the number of blood units required (0.7 units less in IS/EPO group). Patients who required transfusion had a longer hospital stay, (1.7 days; 13.2 vs. 11.5; p<0.005). Patients who received IS had better functional recovery assessed with Barthel index and the Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC scale) at 3 and 6 months after the fracture. Patients with malnutrition or subtrochanteric fracture needed more tabletransfusions (p<0.005). Functional recovery at 3 and 6 months after fracture was better in patients who received intravenous iron. Neither blood transfusions nor intravenous iron were associated with infectious complications or increased mortality. The patient series of this study was compared with a group of patients with hip fracture and similar characteristics seen in 2011, before intravenous iron was available, revealing a 17% reduction in blood transfusion needs (p<0.005).

CONCLUSION

The use of intravenous iron in elderly patients with hip fracture may help to reduce the number of blood units needed for the treatment of anaemia, although a causal relationship cannot be established due to not having a control group. Transfusions were associated with longer hospital stay in elderly patients with hip fracture.

Ferric Gluconate Complex in Elderly Hospital Inpatients without Terminal Kidney Failure

BACKGROUND

Anemia is a common health issue for elderly patients. For patients with iron deficiency who cannot tolerate iron supplementation by the oral route, the parenteral route may be used. Options for parenteral iron supplementation include ferric gluconate complex (FGC).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety of FGC in elderly patients without terminal kidney failure and to assess its efficacy in treating iron-deficiency anemia.

METHODS

An observational chart review was conducted at a tertiary care university health centre. Patients included in the study were 65 years of age or older, had received at least 1 dose of FGC between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015, and had a hemoglobin count of less than 130 g/L (men) or less than 120 g/L (women) at baseline. For each patient, the observation period began when the first dose of FGC was administered and ended 60 days after the last dose. The main safety outcome (occurrence of any adverse reaction) was evaluated for every patient, with the efficacy analysis being limited to patients with a diagnosis of iron-deficiency anemia.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients were included in the study, of whom 76 had iron-deficiency anemia. No serious, life-threatening adverse reactions were reported. The most commonly reported adverse reactions were nausea and vomiting. The mean increase in hemoglobin count was 13.5 g/L, a statistically significant change from baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that FGC is safe for use in elderly patients, with very few mild adverse reactions. Use of FGC led to increased hemoglobin count within 60 days. Of the 3 options for parenteral iron supplementation available in Canada, iron sucrose has not been studied in elderly patients, and iron dextran has a higher incidence of anaphylaxis, whereas FGC appears to be a safe alternative for patients with intolerance to oral iron.

Is treatment of geriatric hip fracture patients cost-covering? Results of a prospective study conducted at a German University Hospital

INTRODUCTION

Hip fractures have increased medical and socio-economic importance due to demographic transition. Information concerning direct treatment costs and their reimbursement in Germany is lacking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four hundred two hip fracture patients older than 60 years of age were observed prospectively at a German University Hospital. Treatment costs were determined with up to 196 cost factors and compared to the reimbursement. Finally, statistical analysis was performed to identify clinical parameters influencing the cost-reimbursement relation.

RESULTS

Treatment costs were 8853 € (95% CI 8297-9410 €), while reimbursement was 8196 € (95% CI 7707-8772 €), resulting in a deficit of 657 € (95% CI 143-1117 €). Bivariate analysis showed that the cost-reimbursement relation was negatively influenced mainly by higher age, higher ASA score, readmission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and red blood cell transfusion. Adjusted for other parameters, readmission to the ICU was a significant negative predictor (- 2669 €; 95% CI - 4070 to - 1268 €; p < 0.001), while age of 60-75 years was a positive predictor for the cost-reimbursement relation (1373 €; 95% CI 265-2480 €; p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of geriatric hip fracture patients in a university hospital in Germany does not seem to be cost-covering. Adjustment of the reimbursement for treatment of complex hip fracture patients should be considered.

[Treatment of anemia in hip fracture surgery]

Repairing hip fractures is one of the most common surgical procedures and has greater morbidity and mortality. This procedure is also a process that involves a greater need for blood products. Numerous factors influence morbidity, mortality and the use of blood products: patient age, concomitant diseases and drug treatments that change hemostasis and hemorrhaging (preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative), which are usually significant. On top of all this is the presence in a high percentage of cases of preoperative anemia, which can have one or more causes. It is therefore essential to establish an appropriate management of perioperative anemia and optimize the transfusion policy. The aim of this review is to briefly analyze the epidemiology of hip fractures as well as establish a basis for treating perioperative anemia and transfusion policies, proposing guidelines and recommendations for clinical management based on the most current studies.

A systematic review of pre-operative anaemia and blood transfusion in patients with fractured hips

We systematically reviewed the observational associations of anaemia with outcomes and the effects of interventions to increase haemoglobin concentrations following hip fracture in older people. Anaemia on hospital admission was associated with increased mortality, relative risk 1.64 (95% CI 1.47-1.82), p < 0.0001. After adjustment for co-morbidities, the association of anaemia with increased mortality remained in four of eight observational studies. There was no association of postoperative transfusion with mortality after adjusting for covariates. Transfusion at 80 g.l(-1) vs 100 g.l(-1) increased acute myocardial infarction, relative risk 1.67 (95% CI 1.01-2.77), p = 0.05. Transfusion threshold was not associated with differences in other outcomes. There were insufficient high-quality studies to inform pre-operative blood transfusion or the use of peri-operative iron or erythropoietin. Studies for most interventions recruited too few participants to determine effects on infections, mortality or function.

[Anticoagulation medication for proximal femoral fractures: prospective validation study of new institutional guidelines]

BACKGROUND

Under current guidelines surgical care of hip fractures has to be initiated within 48 h which is a challenge for the management of patients on medical anticoagulation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in-house standard operation procedure (SOP) concerning these patients.

METHODS

All geriatric hip fracture patients were included in this prospective study. Data concerning medical anticoagulation and hemoglobin levels on admission and at discharge, the start and duration of surgery, transfusion rates and postoperative complications were collected

RESULTS

A total of 154 (62%) out of 247 patients were on anticoagulants. Patients on acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) demonstrated a significant increase in the rate of transfusion (62%, 95% CI, range 53%-72%, p<0.05) but lost significantly less hemoglobin during hospitalization (1.25 g/dl, 95% CI 0.62-1.88g/dl, p<0.05) in comparison to the control group (40% transfused, hemoglobin loss 3.00 g/dl). Patients on phenprocoumon were operated on later (26 h versus 20 h,95% CI 22-30, p<0.001). There were no significant differences concerning complications.

CONCLUSION

Under this SOP anticoagulation has no impact on complication rates after hip fracture. The increased transfusion rates under ASS can be attributed to early blood transfusions. Antagonization of coumarin with vitamin K delays surgery but seems adequate. An analysis of more patients over a longer period of time should be conducted.

[Acute orthogeriatric care (II). Clinical aspects]

The present article reviews the clinical principles of acute orthogeriatric care. The application of geriatric medicine to patients with hip fracture is explained. The principal stages of geriatric intervention in this process are mentioned, as are the interventions to be carried out by the geriatric team. Subsequently, we discuss the management of several frequent problems in these patients, such as high surgical risk, pain management, anaemia, delirium, malnutrition, and discharge planning. Lastly, the characteristics of several kinds of patients with special characteristics are mentioned, such as those diagnosed with dementia, nursing home residents or the oldest-old. Areas of improvement in the acute phase are also reviewed, such as mortality reduction, functional outcome improvement and the need for more efficient resource use in patients in the acute phase of hip fracture.

Análisis del impacto presupuestario de la implantación de medidas de ahorro de sangre en cirugía de urgencia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To assess the cost-effectiveness and the budget impact of a Blood Saving Program (BSP) in patients older than 65 undergoing perthrocanteric hip fracture surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Two groups of patients with perthrocanteric fracture were included. Group 1: patients not receiving treatment for perisurgical anaemia or treated with oral iron; Group 2: patients included in a BSP (treatment with endovenous iron sucrose and alfa epoetin, plus restrictive transfusional criteria). Effectiveness issues were: transfusion rate and number of red blood cell units transfused, length of postoperative stay and infection rate. Treatment cost was calculated using drug and transfused red blood cell unit prizes in 2003. We calculated potential patient population according to 2003 data.

RESULTS

144 patients were included, 43 of which were in the BSP. Both groups were comparable in gender, age, preoperative length of stay, ASA and haemoglobin level at admission. Patients included in the BSP were less transfused and had less infections but postoperative stay was similar in both groups. The budget impact was 239,148 euros 95% [confidence interval (CI) 202,312-311,980] at group 1 and 311,980 euros [95% CI 275,288-348,672] at the BSP group. Including the whole potential population in the BSP (during one year 400 patients) would mean a cost increase of 72,832 euros, avoiding transfusion in 92 patients, infection in 70 patients, and saving 328 red blood cell units.

CONCLUSIONS

The cost increase due to endovenous iron sucrose and alfa-epoetin can be considered affordable for the hospital budget. BSP provides lower transfusion and infection rates and saves red blood cell units, compared to the standard procedure. Differences in postoperative stay should be analyzed in further larger and prospective studies including more patients.

Perioperative stimulation of erythropoiesis with intravenous iron and erythropoietin reduces transfusion requirements in patients with hip fracture. A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture (HF) often receive perioperative allogeneic blood transfusions (ABT) to avoid anaemia. However, concerns about the adverse effects of ABT have prompted the review of transfusion practice and the search for a safer treatment of perioperative anaemia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively investigated the effect of a blood-saving protocol of perioperative iron sucrose (3 x 200 mg/48 h, intravenously) plus erythropoietin (1 x 40,000 IU, subcutaneously) if admission haemoglobin level < 130 g/l, on transfusion requirements and postoperative morbid-mortality in patients with HF (group 2; n= 83). A parallel series of 41 HF patients admitted to another surgical unit within the same hospital served as the control group (group 1). Perioperative blood samples were taken for haematimetric, iron metabolism and inflammatory parameter determination.

RESULTS

This blood-saving protocol reduced the number of transfused patients (P < 0.001), the number of transfused units (P < 0.0001), increased the reticulocyte count and improved iron metabolism. In addition, the blood-saving protocol also reduced the rate of postoperative infections (P = 0.016), but not the 30-day mortality rate or the mean length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

The blood-saving protocol implemented seems to reduce ABT requirements in patients with HF, and is associated with a lower postoperative morbidity. The possible mechanisms involved in these effects are discussed.

Efectividad de distintas pautas de tratamiento de la anemia perioperatoria en pacientes ancianos con fractura de cadera

OBJECTIVE

To describe and study the effectiveness of the perioperative anaemia treatment patterns for patients older than 64 with hip fracture.

METHOD

Three groups of patients were compared: Group 1: Oral iron or without iron therapy. Group 2: low doses of intravenous iron. Group 3: treated according to a blood saving programme including intravenous iron, alpha epoetin and restrictive transfusional criteria. The homogeneity of gender, age, type of fracture, ASA, preoperative period and perisurgical bleeding affecting drug consumption within the groups was analyzed. The effectiveness of the treatments was determined by means of transfusional rate, postoperative haemoglobin levels, and postoperative length of stay and infection rate.

RESULTS

329 patients were checked. Patients were comparable. Patients included in Group 3 were transfused less than the rest (36.5 of patients in group 3 vs. 52.0% in group 1 and 67.6% in group 3, p = 0.002). Decreases in the infection rate and mean postoperative stay in group 3 were not significant. Haemoglobin levels at 48 hours post surgery were higher in group 1 but haemoglobin levels at the seventh day post surgery were similar for the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The above mentioned blood saving programme has been observed to be effective in decreasing transfusional requirements without increasing morbidity. However, further prospective studies are needed in order to define the cost-effectiveness of this programme and to determine its role in the reduction of posttransfusional infections and postoperative length of stay.