Equivalent efficacy of a time-release form of niacin (Niaspan) given once-a-night versus plain niacin in the management of hyperlipidemia

Anti-b diminishes hyperlipidaemia and hepatic steatosis in hamsters and mice by suppressing the mTOR/PPARγ and mTOR/SREBP1 signalling pathways

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

As a chronic metabolic syndrome, hyperlipidaemia is manifested as aberrantly elevated cholesterol and triglyceride (TG) levels, primarily attributed to disorders in lipid metabolism. Despite the promising outlook for hyperlipidaemia treatment, the need persists for the development of lipid-lowering agents with heightened efficiency and minimal toxicity. This investigation aims to elucidate the lipid-lowering effects and potential pharmacodynamic mechanisms of Anti-b, a novel low MW compound.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

We employed high-fat diet (HFD) in hamsters and mice or oleic acid (OA) in cultures of HepG2 cells and LO2 cells to induce hyperlipidaemia models. We administered Anti-b to assess its therapeutic effects on dyslipidaemia and hepatic steatosis. We used western blotting, RNA sequencing, GO and KEGG analysis, oil red O staining, along with molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the effects of Anti-b.

KEY RESULTS

Anti-b exhibited a substantial reduction in HFD-induced elevation of blood lipids, liver weight to body weight ratio, liver diameter and hepatic fat accumulation. Moreover, Anti-b demonstrated therapeutic effects in alleviating total cholesterol (TC), TG levels, and lipid accumulation derived from OA in HepG2 cells and LO2 cells. Mechanistically, Anti-b selectively bound to the mTOR kinase protein and increased mTOR thermal stability, resulting in downregulation of phosphorylation level. Notably, Anti-b exerted anti-hyperlipidaemia effects by modulating PPARγ and SREBP1 signalling pathways and reducing the expression level of mSREBP1 and PPARγ proteins.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

In conclusion, our study has provided initial data of a novel low MW compound, Anti-b, designed and synthesised to target mTOR protein directly. Our results indicate that Anti-b may represent a novel class of drugs for the treatment of hyperlipidemia and hepatic steatosis.

Niacin-induced flushing: Mechanism, pathophysiology, and future perspectives

Flushing is a typical physiological reaction to high emotional reactions. It is characterized by cutaneous vasodilation and a feeling of warmth and skin redness, especially in the face areas. Flushing is frequently linked to social anxiety, but it can also be a sign of a number of benign and malignant medical disorders. The study focuses on niacin-induced flushing, a well-researched side effect of the niacin, a drug which increases cholesterol levels. Niacin-induced flushing occurs when the hydroxycarboxylic acid receptor 2 (HCA2 or GPR109A) is activated. This starts a signaling cascade that releases prostaglandins, especially PGD2, which causes cutaneous vasodilation. Furthermore, niacin directly interacts with the transient receptor potential (TRP) channel TRPV1, offering a different, non-prostaglandin-based explanation for flushing brought on by niacin, highlighting the intricate physiological mechanisms behind this widespread occurrence. The review delves deeper into the advantages of niacin treatment for the cardiovascular system, highlighting how it can improve lipid profiles and lower cardiovascular events when used with statins. To sum it up, this study offers a thorough understanding of flushing, including its physiological foundation, many etiologies, diagnostic difficulties, and the subtleties of flushing caused by niacin. The investigation of innovative dose forms and nanomedicine highlights the continuous endeavors to improve patient compliance and reduce side effects, laying the groundwork for further developments in flushing treatment.

Lipoprotein(a) and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease, the Impact of Available Lipid-Lowering Medications on Lipoprotein(a): An Update on New Therapies

OBJECTIVE

To review evidence of existing and new pharmacological therapies for lowering lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) concentrations and their impact on clinically relevant outcomes.

METHODS

We searched for literature pertaining to Lp(a) and pharmacological treatments in PubMed. We reviewed articles published between 1963 and 2020.

RESULTS

We found that statins significantly increased Lp(a) concentrations. Therapies that demonstrated varying degrees of Lp(a) reduction included ezetimibe, niacin, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, lipoprotein apheresis, fibrates, aspirin, hormone replacement therapy, antisense oligonucleotide therapy, and small interfering RNA therapy. There was limited data from large observational studies and post hoc analyses showing the potential benefits of these therapies in improving cardiovascular outcomes.

CONCLUSION

There are multiple lipid-lowering agents currently being used to treat hyperlipidemia that also have a Lp(a)-lowering effect. Two RNA therapies specifically targeted to lower Lp(a) are being investigated in phase 3 clinical trials and, thus far, have shown promising results. However, evidence is lacking to determine the clinical relevance of reducing Lp(a). At present, there is a need for large-scale, randomized, controlled trials to evaluate cardiovascular outcomes associated with lowering Lp(a).

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Assess the Effects of 8 Weeks of Administration of GSK256073, a Selective GPR109A Agonist, on High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Subjects With Dyslipidemia

GPR109A (HM74A), a G-protein-coupled receptor, is hypothesized to mediate lipid and lipoprotein changes and dermal flushing associated with niacin administration. GSK256073 (8-chloro-3-pentyl-1H-purine-2,6[3H,7H]-dione) is a selective GPR109A agonist shown to suppress fatty acid levels and produce mild flushing in short-term clinical studies. This study evaluated the effects of GSK256073 on lipids in subjects with low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc). Subjects (n = 80) were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive GSK256073 5, 50, or 150 mg/day or matching placebo for 8 weeks. The primary end point was determining the GSK256073 exposure-response relationship for change from baseline in HDLc. No significant exposure response was observed between GSK256073 and HDLc levels. GSK256073 did not significantly alter HDLc levels versus placebo, but rather revealed a trend at the 150-mg dose for a nonsignificant decrease in HDLc (-6.31%; P = .12) and an increase in triglycerides (median, 24.4%; 95% confidence interval, 7.3%-41.6%). Flushing was reported in 21%, 25%, and 60% of subjects (5, 50, and 150 mg, respectively) versus 24% for placebo. Results indicated that selective activation of the GPR109A receptor with GSK256073 did not produce niacin-like lipid effects. These findings add to the increasing evidence that niacin-mediated lipoprotein changes occur predominantly via GPR109A-independent pathways.

Effect of dietary niacin supplementation on performance, total tract nutrient retention, carcass yield and meat lipid profile of growing turkeys

A study was conducted to investigate the influence of dietary high or recommended nicotinic acid (niacin) supplementation on growth performance, total tract nutrient digestibility, hematology, serum chemistry, and lipoprotein concentrations in the serum and meat of growing turkeys. Turkeys were assigned to three treatments on weight equalisation basis with five replicates of eight turkeys in each group. Experimental diets were: no supplemental niacin (Control), a diet supplemented with 60 mg/kg niacin termed as recommended niacin supplementation and a diet supplemented with 180 mg/kg niacin termed as high niacin supplementation (HNS). The experiment lasted for the grower (Day 56–84) and finisher phases (Day 84–112) of the birds. Dietary inclusion of HNS increased (P < 0.01) bodyweight gain, metabolisable energy (Days 84 and 112), dressing percentage and retail cut parts of turkeys (Day 112) in relation to the Control-fed turkeys. Furthermore, least white blood cell count and higher concentrations of packed cell volume, red blood cells and hemoglobin (P < 0.01) were found in turkeys fed HNS on Days 84 and 112. Similarly, turkeys in the HNS group had improved serum constituents including serum protein, uric acid, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphate. The blood and meat lipid profile analysis showed that low density lipoprotein and total cholesterol were least (P < 0.05) in turkeys fed HNS. Collectively, dietary high supplementation of niacin (180 mg/kg) improves production performances, reduces serum and meat fat content and improve indicators of stress resistance ability in growing turkeys.

Spray-dried pH-sensitive microparticles: effectual methodology to ameliorate the bioavailability of acid labile pravastatin

Pravastatin is a promising drug utilized in the treatment of hyperlipidemia, yet, its main clinical limitation is due to gastric liability which fractions its oral bioavailability to less than 18%. The purpose of the current study is to encapsulate pravastatin into Eudragit^®-based spray-dried microparticles aspiring to overcome its acid liability. With the aim to optimize the microparticles, formulation and process parameters were studied through acid resistance challenging test. Physicochemical characterization of the optimized spray-dried pH-sensitive microparticles namely; in-vitro dissolution, surface morphology, compatibility, and solid-state studies were performed. Moreover, in-vivo evaluation of the microparticles and accelerated stability studies were carried out. The results outlined that polymer to drug ratio at 5:1 and pravastatin concentration at 1%w/w in spray-drying feed solution showed 38.55% and 53.97% encapsulation efficiency, respectively. The significance of process parameters specifically; the flow rate and the inlet temperature on microparticles surface integrity were observed, and optimized until encapsulating efficiency reached 72.37%. The scanning electron microscopical examination of the optimized microparticles illustrate uniform smooth surface spheres entrapping the drug in an amorphous state as proved through Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier Transfer Infrared (FTIR) studies. The in-vivo evaluation demonstrated a 5-fold enhancement in pravastatin bioavailability compared to the marketed product. The results provided evidence for the significance of spray-dried pH-sensitive microparticles as a promising carrier for pravastatin, decreasing its acid liability, and improving its bioavailability.

Niacin for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events

BACKGROUND

Nicotinic acid (niacin) is known to decrease LDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides, and increase HDL-cholesterol levels. The evidence of benefits with niacin monotherapy or add-on to statin-based therapy is controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of niacin therapy versus placebo, administered as monotherapy or add-on to statin-based therapy in people with or at risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in terms of mortality, CVD events, and side effects.

SEARCH METHODS

Two reviewers independently and in duplicate screened records and potentially eligible full texts identified through electronic searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, two trial registries, and reference lists of relevant articles (latest search in August 2016).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that either compared niacin monotherapy to placebo/usual care or niacin in combination with other component versus other component alone. We considered RCTs that administered niacin for at least six months, reported a clinical outcome, and included adults with or without established CVD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers used pre-piloted forms to independently and in duplicate extract trials characteristics, risk of bias items, and outcomes data. Disagreements were resolved by consensus or third party arbitration. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses, sensitivity analyses based on risk of bias and different assumptions for missing data, and used meta-regression analyses to investigate potential relationships between treatment effects and duration of treatment, proportion of participants with established coronary heart disease and proportion of participants receiving background statin therapy. We used GRADE to assess the quality of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 23 RCTs that were published between 1968 and 2015 and included 39,195 participants in total. The mean age ranged from 33 to 71 years. The median duration of treatment was 11.5 months, and the median dose of niacin was 2 g/day. The proportion of participants with prior myocardial infarction ranged from 0% (4 trials) to 100% (2 trials, median proportion 48%); the proportion of participants taking statin ranged from 0% (4 trials) to 100% (12 trials, median proportion 100%).Using available cases, niacin did not reduce overall mortality (risk ratio (RR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97 to 1.12; participants = 35,543; studies = 12; I2 = 0%; high-quality evidence), cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.12; participants = 32,966; studies = 5; I2 = 0%; moderate-quality evidence), non-cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.28; participants = 32,966; studies = 5; I2 = 0%; high-quality evidence), the number of fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarctions (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.00; participants = 34,829; studies = 9; I2 = 0%; moderate-quality evidence), nor the number of fatal or non-fatal strokes (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.22; participants = 33,661; studies = 7; I2 = 42%; low-quality evidence). Participants randomised to niacin were more likely to discontinue treatment due to side effects than participants randomised to control group (RR 2.17, 95% CI 1.70 to 2.77; participants = 33,539; studies = 17; I2 = 77%; moderate-quality evidence). The results were robust to sensitivity analyses using different assumptions for missing data.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Moderate- to high-quality evidence suggests that niacin does not reduce mortality, cardiovascular mortality, non-cardiovascular mortality, the number of fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarctions, nor the number of fatal or non-fatal strokes but is associated with side effects. Benefits from niacin therapy in the prevention of cardiovascular disease events are unlikely.

Effect of extended-release niacin on plasma lipoprotein(a) levels: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials

AIM

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a proatherogenic and prothrombotic lipoprotein. Our aim was to quantify the extended-release nicotinic acid Lp(a) reducing effect with a meta-analysis of the available randomized clinical trials.

METHODS

A meta-analysis and random-effects meta-regression were performed on data pooled from 14 randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials published between 1998 and 2015, comprising 17 treatment arms, which included 9013 subjects, with 5362 in the niacin arm.

RESULTS

The impact of ER niacin on plasma Lp(a) concentrations was reported in 17 treatment arms. Meta-analysis suggested a significant reduction of Lp(a) levels following ER niacin treatment (weighted mean difference - WMD: -22.90%, 95% CI: -27.32, -18.48, p<0.001). Results also remained similar when the meta-analysis was repeated with standardized mean difference as summary statistic (WMD: -0.66, 95% CI: -0.82, -0.50, p<0.001). When the studies were categorized according to the administered dose, there was a comparable effect between the subsets of studies with administered doses of <2000mg/day (WMD: -21.85%, 95% CI: -30.61, -13.10, p<0.001) and ≥2000mg/day (WMD: -23.21%, 95% CI: -28.41, -18.01, p<0.001). The results of the random-effects meta-regression did not suggest any significant association between the changes in plasma concentrations of Lp(a) with dose (slope: -0.0001; 95% CI: -0.01, 0.01; p=0.983), treatment duration (slope: -0.40; 95% CI: -0.97, 0.17; p=0.166), and percentage change in plasma HDL-C concentrations (slope: 0.44; 95% CI: -0.48, 1.36; p=0.350).

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials, treatment with nicotinic acid was associated with a significant reduction in Lp(a) levels.

Reducing cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes: the potential contribution of nicotinic acid

Current treatment guidelines highlight the increased cardiovascular risk associated with type 2 diabetes and identify the need for intensive risk factor management. Dyslipidaemia characterised by elevated serum triglycerides, low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and an increase in small, dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) particles (the lipid triad), is one of the most important modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes. Statins, which are effective in reducing LDL-C, are currently considered the foundation of lipid-lowering treatment in type 2 diabetes, in addition to lifestyle modification. Increasingly, guidelines also identify low HDL-C as an important secondary priority for treatment. Of the available treatment options, both fibrates and nicotinic acid are effective in treating dyslipidaemia associated with type 2 diabetes, although the latter has greater potency in raising HDL-C. Based on its profile of activity, addition of nicotinic acid to primary statin therapy would be a logical strategy in the treatment of diabetic dyslipidaemia. Outcome data from large prospective studies are awaited to confirm the potential morbidity and mortality benefits of this approach.

Review: Use of nicotinic acid in patients with elevated fasting glucose, diabetes, or metabolic syndrome

This paper will focus on the use of nicotinic acid as a therapeutic option for cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with abnormal glucose metabolism and `atherogenic dyslipidaemia'. This is characterised by low levels of HDL-C, high triglycerides, and preponderance of small, dense LDL particles. Whilst nicotinic acid may increase plasma glucose in some patients, more recent studies show that the effect of nicotinic acid on glycaemic control is minimal in the majority of patients, and that nicotinic acid decreases the risk of cardiac events in patients with elevated fasting glucose, diabetes, or metabolic syndrome.

NAUTILUS (Safety and tolerability of Niaspan®): a subgroup analysis in patients with diabetes

The multiceNtre, open, uncontrolled sAfety and tolerability stUdy of a modified-release nicoTinic acId formuLation in sUbjects with dySlipidaemia and low HDL-cholesterol (NAUTILUS) trial was designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of prolonged-release nicotinic acid (Niaspan®) in patients treated for dyslipidaemia in a usual care setting in Germany. The dyslipidaemia was inadequately controlled by diet, including low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (< 1.0 mmol/L [< 40 mg/dL] in men and < 1.2 mmol/L [<46 mg/dL] in women). This analysis focuses on the tolerability and safety of Niaspan® in patients with diabetes. Diabetic and non-diabetic subjects reported similar incidences of all-cause adverse events (AE; 59.9% vs. 60.8%, respectively), serious AE (SAE; 4.0% vs. 3.4%, respectively) and withdrawals for AE (17.6% vs. 16.4%). Flushing was the most common side effect, as expected (42% of patients in each group), but < 10% withdrew for flushing. There was no indication of hepatotoxicity or serious muscle toxicity in diabetic or non-diabetic subjects. Changes in glycaemic parameters were small (mean changes in diabetic subjects of +0.2% HbA1C and +0.4 mmol/L [+8 mg/dL] for fasting plasma glucose), despite marked reductions in the intensity of antidiabetic therapy in about one third of patients. Niaspan® was equally effective in diabetic or non-diabetic subjects in increasing HDL-C (+24% in each group) and decreasing triglycerides (-12% and -13%, respectively). Niaspan® was well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes and the results of NAUTILUS support its use for correction of low HDL-C in this population.

Niacin Alternatives for Dyslipidemia: Fool's Gold or Gold Mine? Part I: Alternative Niacin Regimens

Niacin was the first drug demonstrating lowered cholesterol prevents coronary heart disease (CHD) events, with two clinical CHD outcome studies establishing a cardioprotective niacin regimen: 1 g thrice daily with meals. Though cardioprotective, skin toxicity limits niacin's use, fostering several variations to improve tolerability. One of these, an extended-release (ER) alternative, proved immensely successful commercially, dominating clinical practice despite departing from the established regimen in several critical ways. Hence, improved tolerability may have come at the cost of diminished efficacy, posing a conundrum: Does it still help the population at risk for CHD to broaden a drug's acceptance by "watering it down"? This question is crucial at this stage now that the ER alternative failed to recapitulate the benefits of the established cardioprotective niacin regimen in two trials of the alternative approach: AIM-HIGH and HPS2-THRIVE. Part I of this review discusses how vastly the ER alternative departs from the established cardioprotective regimen, why that is important physiologically, and how it may explain the findings of AIM-HIGH and HPS2-THRIVE. Given important gaps left by statin therapy, the established cardioprotective niacin regimen remains an important evidence-based therapy for the statin intolerant or statin averse.

Effects of established hypolipidemic drugs on HDL concentration, subclass distribution, and function

The knowledge of an inverse relationship between plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentrations and rates of cardiovascular disease has led to the concept that increasing plasma HDL-C levels would be protective against cardiovascular events. Therapeutic interventions presently available to correct the plasma lipid profile have not been designed to specifically act on HDL, but have modest to moderate effects on plasma HDL-C concentrations. Statins, the first-line lipid-lowering drug therapy in primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention, have quite modest effects on plasma HDL-C concentrations (2-10%). Fibrates, primarily used to reduce plasma triglyceride levels, also moderately increase HDL-C levels (5-15%). Niacin is the most potent available drug in increasing HDL-C levels (up to 30%), but its use is limited by side effects, especially flushing.The present chapter reviews the effects of established hypolipidemic drugs (statins, fibrates, and niacin) on plasma HDL-C levels and HDL subclass distribution, and on HDL functions, including cholesterol efflux capacity, endothelial protection, and antioxidant properties.

Niacin increased glucose, insulin, and C-peptide levels in sedentary nondiabetic postmenopausal women

The current study examined the effects of niacin and a single bout of aerobic exercise on plasma glucose, insulin, and C-peptide in sedentary, nondiabetic postmenopausal women. As a crossover design, 17 participants underwent four different trials: rest during the no-niacin condition (R), exercise during the no-niacin condition (E), rest during the with-niacin condition (RN), and exercise during the with-niacin condition (EN). All participants took 1,000 mg/day of extended-release niacin for 4 weeks during the with-niacin conditions (RN and EN). The exercise treatment consisted of a single bout of treadmill walking at 60% heart rate reserve until 400 kcal were expended. Blood samples were collected at 24 hours after each trial and analyzed for changes in plasma glucose, insulin, and C-peptide. A two by two analysis of variance was used to examine the changes in dependent variables, and the Bonferroni adjustment was employed as the post hoc test. The level of statistical significance was set at P<0.05. There was no significant interaction between exercise and niacin, nor was there a main effect of exercise for changes in glucose, insulin, or C-peptide. However, there was a significant main effect for niacin as mean glucose, insulin, and C-peptide values significantly increased with niacin; glucose increased 10.6% (P=0.001), from 95.03±10.67 mg/dL to 105.07±13.56 mg/dL; insulin increased 61.8% (P=0.001), from 16.98±12.49 μU/mL to 27.48±14.84 μU/mL; and C-peptide increased 46.1% (P=0.001), from 1.65±0.75 ng/mL to 2.41±0.97 ng/mL. Although niacin was generally well tolerated, given its adverse effects on glucose, insulin, and C-peptide profiles, the use of niacin should be done so with caution and under medical supervision.

Extended-release niacin/lovastatin: the first combination product for dyslipidemia

Many clinical studies have demonstrated that lipid-altering drug treatments, including the use of statin and niacin monotherapy, can be effective in the primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease, but only in a minority of patients relative to placebo. Since statins and niacin have entirely different mechanisms of action and predominantly different effects on blood lipid levels, the combined use of both a statin and niacin may confer complementary benefits on multiple lipid parameters, produce a more global improvement in lipid blood levels and result in greater reductions in coronary heart disease risk factors than the administration of either agent alone. This may be of particular importance in patients with complex dyslipidemias, such as those with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome. This review summarizes the efficacy and safety of extended-release niacin/lovastatin (Advicor, Kos Pharmaceuticals Inc.), the first combination product approved for the management of dyslipidemia.

Pharmacological interventions in human HDL metabolism

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review focuses on the recent developments in the field of drugs that affect HDL metabolism. Additionally, some general (retrospective) thoughts on fighting cardiovascular disease through modulating circulating lipids are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently, the large 'Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome with Low HDL/High Triglycerides: Impact on Global Health Outcomes', 'Treatment of HDL to Reduce the Incidence of Vascular Events' and dal-OUTCOMES studies have challenged the idea that raising HDL cholesterol (HDL-c) decreases cardiovascular disease risk. Concerning the failure of these trials, it may, however, be noted that patients with close to normal HDL-c levels were included. It is shown that anacetrapib and evacetrapib massively increase HDL-c, and both compounds are currently tested in phase-III clinical trials. More specific and stronger activators of liver X receptor and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) are being developed and tested in a preclinical setting. RVX-208 treatment failed to decrease atheroma volume in coronary artery disease patients. Lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase replacement therapy showed positive results in a patient with lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase deficiency.

SUMMARY

Inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer protein, antagomirs against microRNA-33, ApoA-I mimetics and PPARα or PPARα/δ agonists hold on the basis of the current data most promise. However, it will in our opinion be the key that patients with low HDL-c and increased triglyceride should be treated and not those at generally increased risk only. In the poststatin era, personalized medicine, which is inevitably on the horizon, is likely to be helpful for patients who do not reach the goals for LDL cholesterol and HDL-c according to the guidelines. Furthermore, functions of HDL will hopefully be identified as future pharmacological targets.

Challenges of a mechanistic feedback model describing nicotinic acid-induced changes in non-esterified fatty acids in rats

Previously, we developed a feedback model to describe the tolerance and oscillatory rebound of non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) plasma concentrations in male Sprague Dawley rats after intravenous infusions of nicotinic acid (NiAc). This study challenges that model, using the following regimens of intravenous and oral NiAc dosing in male Sprague Dawley rats (n = 95) to create different patterns of exposure: (A) 30 min infusion at 0, 1, 5 or 20 μmol kg(-1) body weight; (B) 300 min infusion at 0, 5, 10 or 51 μmol kg(-1); (C) 30 min infusion at 5 μmol kg(-1), followed by a stepwise decrease in rate every 10 min for 180 min; (D) 30 min infusion at 5 μmol kg(-1), followed by a stepwise decrease in rate every 10 min for 180 min and another 30 min infusion at 5 μmol kg(-1) from 210 to 240 min; (E) an oral dose of 0, 24.4, 81.2 or 812 μmol kg(-1). Serial arterial blood samples were taken for measurement of plasma NiAc and NEFA concentrations. The gradual decrease in infusion rate in (C) and (D) were also designed to test the hypothesis that a gradual reduction in NiAc plasma concentration may be expected to reduce or prevent rebound. The absorption of NiAc was described by parallel linear and non-linear processes and the disposition of NiAc by a two-compartment model with endogenous turnover rate and two parallel capacity-limited elimination processes. NEFA (R) turnover, which was driven by the plasma concentration of NiAc via an inhibitory drug-mechanism function acting on NEFA formation, was described by a feedback model with a moderator distributed over a series of transit compartments, where the first compartment (M 1) inhibited the formation of R and the last compartment (M N ) stimulated the loss of R. All processes regulating the plasma NEFA concentration were assumed to be captured by the moderator function. Data were analyzed using non-linear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM). The potency IC 50 of NiAc was 68 nmol L(-1), the fractional turnover rate k out 0.27 L mmol(-1) min(-1), and the turnover rate of moderator k tol 0.023 min(-1). The lower physiological limit of NEFA, which was modeled as a NiAc-independent release (k cap ) of NEFA into plasma, was estimated to 0.023 mmol L(-1) min(-1). The parameter estimates derived in this study were consistent with our previous estimates, suggesting that the model may be used for prediction of the NEFA response time-course following different modes and routes administration of NiAc or NiAc analogues. In order to avoid NiAc-induced NEFA rebound, a slow decline in the NiAc exposure pattern is needed at or below IC (50).

Adherence, Persistence, and Predictors Associated with Early Niacin Termination

Background:

Niacin is the most effective therapy currently available to increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. However, adherence to niacin may be limited by a number of factors and it is important to characterize who is likely to discontinue the medicine.

Objective:

To measure adherence and persistence to niacin, estimate the influence of niacin dose on adherence, and identify factors associated with early termination of niacin.

Methods:

This retrospective study estimated adherence to niacin by calculating the medication possession ratio, persistence, number of refills, and termination proportion in a large, deidentified US health claims database consisting of 42,685 insurance-carrying adults who were new users of niacin.

Results:

We identified 29,801 new users of niacin who were not taking statins or fibric acid, 12,298 new users of niacin plus statin, 441 new users of niacin plus fibric acid, and 145 new users who initiated all 3 agents. Persistence was lowest among individuals taking less than 1 g/day and was highest among those taking niacin plus fibric acid plus statin (5.10 vs 7.17 months, respectively). However, lower niacin dose was associated with greater adherence, regardless of statin use. Termination of niacin within 1 year of initiation was significantly associated with being female or having 1 of the following conditions: peripheral vascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, rheumatic disease, or liver disease. Increased age, taking niacin in combination with a statin, or taking drugs from 2 or more concomitant prescription medication classes were significantly associated with a reduced likelihood of termination within 1 year.

Conclusions:

We observed relatively high adherence rates to niacin; however, most patients failed to persist with use of the drug beyond 7 months.

Differential effects of fenofibrate and extended-release niacin on high-density lipoprotein particle size distribution and cholesterol efflux capacity in dyslipidemic patients

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of therapies that raise high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) to lower cardiovascular disease risk is currently under debate, and further research into the relationship between HDL-C and function is required.

OBJECTIVE

o investigate whether 2 established HDL-C-raising therapies had differential effects on parameters of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) quality and function, such as HDL particle profile and cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC), in patients with dyslipidemia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixty-six patients with dyslipidemia, 24 with low HDL-C levels (<40 mg/dL) and 42 with normal HDL-C levels (40-59 mg/dL), were treated for 6 weeks with fenofibrate (160 mg/d) or extended-release (ER) niacin (0.5 g/d for 3 weeks, then 1 g/d) with 4 weeks of washout between treatments. Lipoprotein particle size distribution was determined using nuclear magnetic resonance, and pathway-specific serum CECs were assessed in J774 macrophages, hepatoma, and Chinese hamster ovary-human adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette transporter G1 cells. Comparable increases in HDL-C and apolipoprotein A-I levels were seen with fenofibrate and ER niacin. There was a shift toward larger HDL, predominantly to medium-size HDL particles for fenofibrate (+209%) and to large HDL particles for ER niacin (+221%). Minor changes in serum CECs were observed with fenofibrate and ER niacin for all the efflux pathways measured. Small increases in plasma cholesteryl ester transfer protein and lecithin: cholesterol acyltransferase concentrations, and decreases in cholesteryl ester transfer protein activity were seen with both drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Fenofibrate and ER niacin increased plasma HDL-C level similarly, but modulated HDL particle size distribution differently; however, these changes did not result in differential effects on serum CECs.

Dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system predicts the development of the metabolic syndrome

CONTEXT

Stress is suggested to lead to metabolic dysregulations as clustered in the metabolic syndrome. Although dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system is found to associate with the metabolic syndrome and its dysregulations, no longitudinal study has been performed to date to examine the predictive value of this stress system in the development of the metabolic syndrome.

OBJECTIVE

We examined whether autonomic nervous system functioning predicts 2-year development of metabolic abnormalities that constitute the metabolic syndrome.

DESIGN

Data of the baseline and 2-year follow-up assessment of a prospective cohort: the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety was used.

SETTING

Participants were recruited in the general community, primary care, and specialized mental health care organizations.

PARTICIPANTS

A group of 1933 participants aged 18-65 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The autonomic nervous system measures included heart rate (HR), respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA; high RSA reflecting high parasympathetic activity), pre-ejection period (PEP; high PEP reflecting low sympathetic activity), cardiac autonomic balance (CAB), and cardiac autonomic regulation (CAR). Metabolic syndrome was based on the updated Adult Treatment Panel III criteria and included high waist circumference, serum triglycerides, blood pressure, serum glucose, and low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol.

RESULTS

Baseline short PEP, low CAB, high HR, and CAR were predictors of an increase in the number of components of the metabolic syndrome during follow-up. High HR and low CAB were predictors of a 2-year decrease in HDL cholesterol, and 2-year increase in diastolic and systolic blood pressure. Short PEP and high CAR also predicted a 2-year increase in systolic blood pressure, and short PEP additionally predicted 2-year increase in diastolic blood pressure. Finally, a low baseline RSA was predictive for subsequent decreases in HDL cholesterol.

CONCLUSION

Increased sympathetic activity predicts an increase in metabolic abnormalities over time. These findings suggest that a dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system is an important predictor of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes through dysregulating lipid metabolism and blood pressure over time.

Extended-release niacin acutely suppresses postprandial triglyceridemia

OBJECTIVE

Postprandial triglyceridemia predicts cardiovascular events. Niacin might lower postprandial triglycerides by restricting free fatty acids. Immediate-release niacin reduced postprandial triglycerides, but extended-release niacin failed to do so when dosed the night before a fat challenge. The study aims were to determine whether extended-release niacin dosed before a fat challenge suppresses postprandial triglycerides and whether postprandial triglycerides are related to free fatty acid restriction.

METHODS

A double-blinded, placebo-controlled, random-order crossover experiment was performed, in which healthy volunteers took 2 g extended-release niacin or placebo 1 hour before heavy cream. We sampled blood over 12 hours and report triglycerides and free fatty acid as means ± standard deviation for incremental area under the curve (AUC) and nadir.

RESULTS

By combining 43 fat challenges from 22 subjects, postprandial triglycerides incremental AUC was +312 ± 200 mg/dL*h on placebo versus +199 ± 200 mg/dL*h on extended-release niacin (33% decrease, P=.02). The incremental nadir for free fatty acid was -0.07 ± 0.15 mmol/L on placebo versus -0.27 ± 0.13 mmol/L on extended-release niacin (P<.0001), and free fatty acid incremental AUC decreased from +2.9 ± 1.5 mmol/L*h to +1.5 ± 1.5 mmol/L*h on extended-release niacin (20% decrease, P=.0015). The incremental AUC for triglycerides was strongly related to the post-dose decrease in free fatty acid (r = +0.58, P=.0007).

CONCLUSIONS

Given right before a fat meal, even a single dose of extended-release niacin suppresses postprandial triglyceridemia. This establishes that postprandial triglycerides suppression is an acute pharmacodynamic effect of extended-release niacin, probably the result of marked free fatty acid restriction. Further study is warranted to determine whether mealtime dosing would augment the clinical efficacy of extended-release niacin therapy.

Niacin: another look at an underutilized lipid-lowering medication

Niacin, or water-soluble vitamin B(3), when given at pharmacologic doses, is a powerful lipid-altering agent. This drug, which lowers the levels of atherogenic, apolipoprotein-B-containing lipoproteins, is one of few medications that can raise the levels of atheroprotective HDL cholesterol. Niacin also has beneficial effects on other cardiovascular risk factors, including lipoprotein(a), C-reactive protein, platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 and fibrinogen. Many clinical trials have confirmed the lipid effects of niacin treatment; however, its effects on cardiovascular outcomes have been called into question owing to the AIM-HIGH trial, which showed no benefit of niacin therapy on cardiovascular endpoints. Furthermore, use of niacin has historically been limited by tolerability issues. In addition to flushing, worsened hyperglycaemia among patients with diabetes mellitus has also been a concern with niacin therapy. This article reviews the utility of niacin including its mechanism of action, clinical trial data regarding cardiovascular outcomes, adverse effect profile and strategies to address these effects and improve compliance.

Niacin: the evidence, clinical use, and future directions

The use of FDA-approved niacin (nicotinic acid or vitamin B3) formulations at therapeutic doses, alone or in combination with statins or other lipid therapies, is safe, improves multiple lipid parameters, and reduces atherosclerosis progression. Niacin is unique as the most potent available lipid therapy to increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and it significantly reduces lipoprotein(a). Through its action on the GPR109A receptor, niacin may also exert beneficial pleiotropic effects independent of changes in lipid levels, such as improving endothelial function and attenuating vascular inflammation. Studies evaluating the impact of niacin in statin-naïve patients on cardiovascular outcomes, or alone and in combination with statins or other lipid therapies on atherosclerosis progression, have been universally favorable. However, the widespread use of niacin to treat residual lipid abnormalities such as low HDL cholesterol, when used in combination with statins among patients achieving very low (<75 mg/dL) low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, is currently not supported by clinical outcome trials.

A systematic review on evidence of the effectiveness and safety of a wax-matrix niacin formulation

Niacin is a uniquely efficacious therapy in the treatment of dyslipidemia because of its broad spectrum of beneficial effects on every aspect of the lipid profile and because it has been shown to reduce both total mortality and coronary death. However, niacin therapy is hindered by its side-effect profile, which appears to be dependent on its formulation with immediate-release niacin, associated with a greater incidence of flushing, and sustained-release niacin, associated with greater liver function test (LFT) abnormalities and hepatotoxicity. One such sustained-release niacin nutritional supplement formulation, Endur-acin (Endurance Products Company, Tigard, OR), claims to have clinical evidence to support its use in the treatment of dyslipidemias, which prompted us to systematically review the literature. We identified four published papers in which the authors reported the results of two separate clinical trials and one pharmacokinetic study that fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Endur-acin significantly reduced total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio with mean reductions up to 19%, 26%, and 20%, respectively, at a dose of 2000 mg/day. Less-impressive benefits were also seen with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (+10%) and serum triglycerides (-23%). Mean LFT elevations of up to 1.6-fold were seen at the 2000 mg per day dose, however, not exceeding three times the upper limit of normal, with abnormal results occurring at similar frequency in placebo and one patient experiencing marked gastrointestinal symptoms and a hepatitis-like syndrome with reversible elevated LFT. Short-term randomized controlled trials suggest Endur-acin is effective in modifying serum lipids, although study limitations prevent a comprehensive evaluation of safety.

Statins and their interactions with other lipid-modifying medications: safety issues in the elderly

Inhibitors of the enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, commonly known as statins, are widely used in both primary and secondary prevention of occlusive cardiovascular disease. Statins are effective not only in improving total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations in blood but also in decreasing morbidity and mortality associated with cardiovascular diseases resulting from underlying atheroma. There is, however, evidence that statins are underutilized in elderly patients, possibly due to concerns about safety/tolerability issues or potential drug interactions, including interactions with other lipid-modifying medications, or both. In this review, we summarize the major adverse events associated with statin use, with particular reference to the elderly patient, including factors which might increase the risk of adverse effects. Potential drug interactions between statins and other lipid-modifying medications including fibrates, ezetimibe, nicotinic acid, bile acid sequestrants and omega-3-acid ethyl esters (fish oils) are specifically discussed. Clinical management strategies to avoid these drug interactions are outlined.

Niacin Inhibits Vascular Inflammation via the Induction of Heme Oxygenase-1

Background—

Heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) is a cytoprotective protein whose expression is consistently associated with therapeutic benefits in a number of pathological conditions such as atherosclerotic vascular disease and inflammation. Niacin is a pleiotropic drug that slows the progression of coronary artery disease and increases serum levels of the HO-1 enzymatic product bilirubin. This study asks if the cardioprotective properties of niacin involve the induction of HO-1.

Methods and Results—

New Zealand White rabbits received chow or chow supplemented with 0.6% (wt/wt) niacin for 2 weeks. Acute vascular inflammation was induced in the animals by placing a nonocclusive silastic collar around the left common carotid artery. At 24 hours after collar implantation, serum bilirubin and vascular, liver, and spleen HO-1 messenger RNA levels were significantly increased. Vascular inflammation was decreased in the niacin-supplemented animals compared with control. Treatment of the animals with tin protoporphyrin-IX, a global HO inhibitor, or HO-1 small interfering RNA to knock down carotid artery HO-1 attenuated the ability of niacin to inhibit vascular inflammation. Treatment of cultured human coronary artery endothelial cells with niacin increased HO-1 expression by activating the nuclear factor-E2–related factor 2/p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway and inhibiting tumor necrosis factor α–induced endothelial inflammation. The antiinflammatory effects of niacin in human coronary artery endothelial cells were mimicked by bilirubin and abolished by incubation with tin protoporphyrin-IX and knock down of nuclear factor-E2–related factor 2.

Conclusions—

Niacin activates HO-1 in vivo and in vitro. Induction of HO-1 may be partly responsible for the vascular protective properties of niacin.

Niacin extended-release therapy in phase III clinical trials is associated with relatively low rates of drug discontinuation due to flushing and treatment-related adverse events: a pooled analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Niacin is a highly effective agent for increasing low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels. It also has beneficial effects on key pro-atherogenic lipoprotein parameters. However, the side effect of flushing can challenge patient adherence to treatment. In this study, we pooled safety data from available trials of at least 16 weeks' duration to evaluate the impact of flushing on patient adherence to niacin extended-release (NER) therapy.

METHODS

Data were pooled from eight NER studies (administered as NER with a maximum dosage of 1000, 1500, and 2000 mg/day, either as monotherapy or in combination with simvastatin 20 or 40 mg/day [NER/S], or lovastatin 20 or 40 mg/day [NER/L]) to evaluate rates of study discontinuation due to flushing or any treatment-related adverse events.

RESULTS

While 66.6% of patients experienced flushing, only 5.2% of patients discontinued treatment due to flushing. Of the total number of patients treated with NER (n = 307), NER/S (n = 912), or NER/L (n = 928), 34 (11%), 105 (11%), and 127 (14%) patients discontinued due to any treatment-related adverse event, respectively, while 14 (5%), 43 (5%), and 55 (6%) discontinued due to flushing. Discontinuation for flushing did not differ with regard to maximum dose, or to the presence or type of statin combined with NER.

CONCLUSION

Although flushing was common with NER treatment, discontinuation due to flushing occurred in only 5-6% of patients in this pooled analysis. This could be due to several factors, including the fact that all patients in the NER trials were educated about flushing and its management. Translation of methodology employed in these trials into clinical practice may improve long-term adherence to NER therapy, which would enhance the therapeutic benefit of NER for reducing cardiovascular risk.

High-density lipoprotein therapy: is there hope?

OPINION STATEMENT

The treatment of lipid abnormalities generally has focused on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction based on extensive clinical trials and the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Unfortunately, it has become increasingly clear that a significant percentage of patients continue to have cardiovascular events despite being on LDL-C-lowering medications and having LDL-C levels below 100 mg/dL. Numerous epidemiologic studies have associated low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Furthermore, recent data show that up to 55% of patients hospitalized for CVD have low HDL-C levels (<40 mg/dL) on admission, suggesting a possible target for further reducing CVD. Low HDL-C also is part of the atherogenic phenotype associated with obesity, glucose intolerance, and hypertension, termed the metabolic syndrome, and often is seen in patients with insulin resistance states. In general, the first line of therapy for increasing HDL-C in patients with levels below 40 mg/dL is lifestyle modification with smoking cessation, exercise, weight loss, and diet modifications. The pharmacologic treatment of isolated low HDL-C in patients without coronary disease is controversial but should be considered in those with a strong family history of CVD. In patients with coronary artery disease and isolated low HDL-C, statins remain the first-line therapy and should be instituted after lifestyle modifications, with the goal of increasing HDL-C above 40 mg/dL. If concomitant hypertriglyceridemia is present, a fibrate or niacin should be considered. Although statins do offer some HDL-C-raising properties, they tend to have modest effects. If treatment goals have not been achieved with either lifestyle changes or statin therapy, then the next agent of choice is niacin. Among the various HDL-C-raising therapies, niacin continues to be the most potent therapeutic option available. There are several novel HDL-C therapies in the research pipeline; however, only one class of medications is relatively close to clinical use, the cholesteryl ester transferase protein (CETP) inhibitors. Although one of the CETP inhibitors, torcetrapib, has received much negative attention from a large randomized trial showing increased mortality associated with its use, the overall class of therapeutic agents may still hold some benefit. Currently, two new CETP inhibitors without the off-target effects of torcetrapib are undergoing clinical research. Overall, the use of HDL-C-modifying agents likely will increase over the next decade.

Important considerations for treatment with dietary supplement versus prescription niacin products

Niacin is a water-soluble B vitamin (B3) known to have favorable effects on multiple lipid parameters, including raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels and lowering triglycerides (TGs), lipoprotein(a), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Although LDL-C remains the primary target of lipid-altering therapy, current guidelines emphasize HDL-C and other modifiable lipid factors as key secondary targets. Thus, niacin is considered an important therapeutic option to help reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with mixed dyslipidemia who, in addition to high LDL-C, have elevated TGs and low HDL-C. Although available prescription niacin products, including immediate-release niacin (IR; Niacor) and an extended-release niacin formulation (Niaspan), have demonstrated safety and efficacy in randomized clinical trials, confusion remains among health care providers and their patients regarding the various commercially available nonprescription dietary supplement niacin products. These dietary supplements, which include IR, sustained-release (SR), and "no-flush" or "flush-free" niacin products, are not subject to the same stringent US Food and Drug Administration regulations as prescription drugs. In fact, both the American Heart Association and the American Pharmacists Association recommend against the use of dietary supplement niacin as a substitute for prescription niacin. Although some dietary supplement IR and SR niacin products have demonstrated a lipid response in clinical trials, products labeled as "no-flush" or "flush-free" that are intended to avoid the common niacin-associated adverse effect of flushing generally contain minimal or no free, pharmacologically active niacin and therefore lack beneficial lipid-modifying effects. To clarify important differences between available prescription and dietary supplement niacin products, this article contrasts current regulatory standards for dietary supplements and prescription drugs and provides an overview of available clinical data from key trials of niacin.

Extended-release niacin/laropiprant lowers serum phosphorus concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Niacin compounds lower serum phosphorus concentrations in patients with end-stage renal disease.

METHODOLOGY

We evaluated the impact of extended release niacin, given in fixed-dose combination with laropiprant, a specific inhibitor of prostaglandin-mediated, niacin-induced flushing, versus placebo, on serum phosphorus concentrations measured serially (at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36) during a 36-week randomized, controlled trial. All subjects had a confirmed diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (n = 446 niacin/laropiprant; n = 339 placebo). Estimated glomerular filtration rate ranged from 36 to 184 mL/min/1.73 m(2), with n = 111 (14.1%) having a value <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Subjects received one tablet daily of extended-release niacin/laropiprant (1g niacin/ 20 mg laropiprant) for the first 4 weeks, and 2 tablets once daily, thereafter, or matched placebo. Niacin lowered serum phosphorus concentrations by 0.36 mg/dL (95% CI: -0.40, -0.31; P < .001), relative to placebo, from baseline values of 3.57 and 3.56 mg/dL in the niacin and placebo groups, respectively. Subgroup analyses revealed no evidence for phosphorus-lowering effect modification by these baseline variables: glomerular filtration rate <60 (n = 111;14.1%) vs ≥60 mL/min/m(2) (n = 674; 85.9%); phosphorus ≤3.5 mg/dL (n = 392; 49.9%) vs >3.5 mg/dL (n = 393; 50.1%); or prior statin use (n = 618; 78.7%) vs nonuse (n = 167; 21.3%).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

These data confirm that niacin's phosphorus-lowering effects-which may have therapeutic implications for the management of hyperphosphatemia and possible prevention of cardiorenal outcomes in renal disease-extend across a broad spectrum of renal function in type 2 diabetics without stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease (a glomerular filtration rate ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m(2)).

Raising HDL cholesterol in women

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentration is essential in the determination of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk in women. This is especially true in the postmenopausal state, where lipid profiles and CHD risk mimic that of age-matched men. Thus, interventions designed to reduce CHD risk by raising HDL-C levels may have particular significance during the transition to menopause. This review discusses HDL-C-raising therapies and the role of HDL in the primary prevention of CHD in women. Lifestyle-based interventions such as dietary change, aerobic exercise regimens, and smoking cessation are initial steps that are effective in raising HDL-C, and available data suggest women respond similarly to men with these interventions. When combined with pharmacotherapy, the effects of these lifestyle alterations are further amplified. Though studies demonstrating gender-specific differences in therapy are limited, niacin continues to be the most effective agent in raising HDL-C levels, especially when used in combination with fibrate or statin therapy. Emerging treatments such as HDL mimetic therapy show much promise in further raising HDL-C levels and improving cardiovascular outcomes.

Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of potential sustained release prodrugs via targeting ASBT

The objective was to synthesize prodrugs of niacin and ketoprofen that target the human apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT) and potentially allow for prolonged drug release. Each drug was conjugated to the naturally occurring bile acid chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) using lysine as a linker. Their inhibitory binding and transport properties were evaluated in stably transfected ASBT-MDCK monolayers, and the kinetic parameters K(i), K(t), normJ(max), and P(p) were characterized. Enzymatic stability of the conjugates was evaluated in Caco-2 and liver homogenate. Both conjugates were potent inhibitors of ASBT. For the niacin prodrug, substrate kinetic parameter K(t) was 8.22microM and normJ(max) was 0.0917. In 4h, 69.4% and 26.9% of niacin was released from 1microM and 5microM of the conjugate in Caco-2 homogenate, respectively. For the ketoprofen prodrug, K(t) was 50.8microM and normJ(max) was 1.58. In 4h, 5.94% and 3.73% of ketoprofen was released from 1microM and 5microM of the conjugate in Caco-2 homogenate, and 24.5% and 12.2% of ketoprofen was released in liver homogenate, respectively. In vitro results showed that these bile acid conjugates are potential prolonged release prodrugs with binding affinity for ASBT.

Responses of blood lipids and lipoproteins to extended-release niacin and exercise in sedentary postmenopausal women

Niacin and exercise positively alter blood lipids and lipoproteins via different mechanisms. However, the effects of niacin combined with exercise on blood lipid and lipoprotein profiles have not been investigated in sedentary postmenopausal women. The current study examined the responses of blood lipids and lipoproteins to niacin and exercise in 18 sedentary postmenopausal women, who underwent four conditions: no-niacin rest, no-niacin exercise, niacin rest, and niacin exercise. Participants ingested 1,000 mg/day of extended-release niacin for 4 weeks during the niacin condition. As an exercise treatment, participants performed a single bout of exercise on a treadmill at 60% heart rate reserve until 400 kcal were expended. Extended-release niacin without the exercise intervention significantly (p < .001) increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein-2 cholesterol by 12.4% and 33.3%, respectively, and decreased the total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio by 14.8%. Thus, 4 weeks of 1,000 mg/day of extended-release niacin can improve the blood lipid and lipoprotein profiles in sedentary postmenopausal women.

Safety and efficacy of laropiprant and extended-release niacin combination in the management of mixed dyslipidemias and primary hypercholesterolemia

Statins form the cornerstone of pharmaceutical cardiovascular disease prevention. However, despite very effective statin intervention, the majority of events remain unpreventable. In some cases statin therapy alone is insufficient to achieve adequate lipid levels whereas other patients are unable to tolerate statins. This calls for additional treatment options. Niacin has a long history of success in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides, and increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. It was the first lipid-lowering drug to demonstrate a reduction in cardiovascular events, and remains the only one that has consistently shown benefits on surrogate outcomes when added to background therapies of other lipid-lowering drugs, including statins. Niacin’s uptake in clinical practice has been less successful due to its side-effect profile, most notable being flushing. The uncovering of the mechanism by which flushing is induced, together with the development of a prostaglandin D₂ receptor inhibitor (laropiprant) which reduces this downstream flushing effect of niacin, has sparked new promise in therapeutic lipid management. It provides an additional treatment option into managing lipid abnormalities. The uptake in clinical practice of the niacin–laropiprant combination will depend on the relative improvements experienced by the patient in the side-effect profile compared to other treatment options, as well as on the the keenly-awaited outcome studies currently underway. Until these data become available guidelines and recommendations are unlikely to change and niacin’s position in therapeutic cardiovascular risk prevention will be determined by clinician opinion and experience, and patient preferences.

A "hot" topic in dyslipidemia management--"how to beat a flush": optimizing niacin tolerability to promote long-term treatment adherence and coronary disease prevention

Niacin is the most effective lipid-modifying agent for raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, but it also causes cutaneous vasodilation with flushing. To determine the frequency of flushing in clinical trials, as well as to delineate counseling and treatment approaches to prevent or manage flushing, a MEDLINE search was conducted of English-language literature from January 1, 1985, through April 7, 2009. This search used the title keywords niacin or nicotinic acid crossed with the Medical Subject Headings adverse effects and human. Niacin flushing is a receptor-mediated, mainly prostaglandin D(2)-driven phenomenon, the frequency, onset, and duration of which are largely determined by the distinct pharmacological and metabolic profiles of different niacin formulations. Subjective assessments include ratings of redness, warmth, itching, and tingling. In clinical trials, most (>60%) niacin users experienced mild or moderate flushing, which tended to decrease in frequency and severity with continued niacin treatment, even with advancing doses. Approximately 5% to 20% of patients discontinued treatment because of flushing. Flushing may be minimized by taking niacin with meals (or at bedtime with a low-fat snack), avoiding exacerbating factors (alcohol or hot beverages), and taking 325 mg of aspirin 30 minutes before niacin dosing. The current review advocates an initially slow niacin dose escalation from 0.5 to 1.0 g/d during 8 weeks and then from 1.0 to 2.0 g in a single titration step (if tolerated). Through effective counseling, treatment prophylaxis with aspirin, and careful dose escalation, adherence to niacin treatment can be improved significantly. Wider implementation of these measures should enable higher proportions of patients to reach sufficient niacin doses over time to prevent cardiovascular events.