Inhibition of the glutamate transporter by L-trans-PDC in the nucleus accumbens prevents the locomotor response to amphetamine

Repeated administration of amphetamine induces a shift of the prefrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala motor function

The role of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and basolateral amygdala (BLA) in the expression of behavioural locomotor sensitization to amphetamine (Amph) has been poorly studied. In the present study, we investigated how lidocaine infused in the mPFC or BLA modulated motor responses to acute and repeated (sensitization) Amph administration. We showed that reversible blockade of mPFC or BLA by lidocaine increased both locomotor and rearing responses to acute Amph, but blocked the expression of behavioural sensitization to Amph. These findings indicate that under free-lidocaine conditions repeated administration of Amph would produce a shift of mPFC and BLA motor function from an inhibitory to a facilitatory role in response to Amph. We propose that this phenomenon may be of major critical importance in the development of drug dependence.

Modulation of the locomotor responses induced by D1-like and D2-like dopamine receptor agonists and D-amphetamine by NMDA and non-NMDA glutamate receptor agonists and antagonists in the core of the rat nucleus accumbens

Dopamine and glutamate interactions in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) play a crucial role in both the development of a motor response suitable for the environment and in the mechanisms underlying the motor-activating properties of psychostimulant drugs such as amphetamine. We investigated the effects of the infusion in the NAcc of NMDA and non-NMDA receptor agonists and antagonists on the locomotor responses induced by the selective D(1)-like receptor agonist SKF 38393, the selective D(2)-like receptor agonist quinpirole, alone or in combination, and D-amphetamine. Infusion of either the NMDA receptor agonist NMDA, the NMDA receptor antagonist D-AP5, the non-NMDA receptor antagonist CNQX, or the non-NMDA receptor agonist AMPA resulted in an increase in basal motor activity. Conversely, all of these ionotropic glutamate (iGlu) receptor ligands reduced the increase in locomotor activity induced by focal infusion of D-amphetamine. Interactions with dopamine receptor activation were not so clear: (i). infusion of NMDA and D-AP5 respectively enhanced and reduced the increase in locomotor activity induced by the infusion of the D(1)-like receptor agonist of SKF 38393, while AMPA or CNQX decreased it; (ii). infusion of NMDA, D-AP5, and CNQX reduced the increase in locomotor activity induced by co-injection of SKF 38393+quinpirole--a pharmacological condition thought to activate both D(1)-like and D(2)-like presynaptic and postsynaptic receptors, while infusion of AMPA potentiated it; (iii). infusion of either NMDA, D-AP5 or CNQX, but not of AMPA, potentiated the decrease in motor activity induced by the D(2)-like receptor agonist quinpirole, a compound believed to act only at presynaptic D(2)-like receptors when injected by itself. Our results show that NMDA receptors have an agonist action with D(1)-like receptors and an antagonist action with D(2)-like receptors, while non-NMDA receptors have the opposite action. This is discussed from a anatamo-functional point of view.

Blockade of the locomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine by group I, group II, and group III metabotropic glutamate receptor ligands in the rat nucleus accumbens: possible interactions with dopamine receptors

Previous investigations have shown that mGlu receptors would be involved in the amphetamine-induced motor response. However, data are somewhat controversial across studies where methodological protocols vary. The aim of the present study was to determine the involvement of mGlu receptors in the NAcc in the locomotor-activating properties of amphetamine in rats well habituated to their experimental environment, a condition known to modulate the motor response to amphetamine. Focal infusion of the group I mGlu receptor antagonist S-4-CPG, which has no effect on basal motor activity, virtually suppressed the locomotor response to amphetamine, while infusion of the group II mGlu receptor antagonist LY 341495 or the group III mGlu receptor agonist AP4, at the minimal dose that produces locomotor activation, reduced it by approximately a half. These effects were blocked by the group I mGlu receptor agonist DHPG, the group II mGlu receptor agonist APDC, and the group III mGlu receptor antagonist MPPG, respectively. These data confirm that mGlu receptors in the NAcc contribute to the psychostimulant motor effect of amphetamine. Results are discussed from the view of recent neuropharmacological studies that have defined the effects of these mGlu receptor ligands on basal motor activity and DA receptor agonists-induced locomotor responses in rats exposed to similar experimental procedures (Eur J Neuroscience 13 (2001) 2157; Neuropharmacology 41 (2001) 454; Eur J Neuroscience 13 (2001) 869). It is suggested that the contribution of mGlu receptors to the amphetamine-induced motor response may result mainly from their functional, either direct or indirect, interactions with D1-like receptors in the NAcc.

Group III metabotropic glutamate receptors and D1-like and D2-like dopamine receptors interact in the rat nucleus accumbens to influence locomotor activity

Evidence for functional interactions between metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors and dopamine (DA) neurotransmission is now clearly established. In the present study, we investigated interactions between group III mGlu receptors and D1- and D2-like receptors in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc). Administration, into the NAcc, of the selective group III mGlu receptor agonist, AP4, resulted in an increase in locomotor activity, which was blocked by pretreatment with the group III mGlu receptor antagonist, MPPG. In addition, pretreatment with AP4 further blocked the increase in motor activity induced by the D1-like receptor agonist, SKF 38393, but potentiated the locomotor responses induced by either the D2-like receptor agonist, quinpirole, or coinfusion of SKF 38393 and quinpirole. MPPG reversed the effects of AP4 on the motor responses induced by D1-like and/or D2-like receptor activation. These results confirm that glutamate transmission may control DA-dependent locomotor function through mGlu receptors and further indicate that group III mGlu receptors oppose the behavioural response produced by D1-like receptor activation and favour those produced by D2-like receptor activation.

Differential modulation of the D1-like- and D2-like dopamine receptor-induced locomotor responses by group II metabotropic glutamate receptors in the rat nucleus accumbens

There is strong evidence for the existence of functional interactions between metabotropic glutamate receptors and dopamine transmission in the nucleus accumbens. In the present study, we investigated the interactions between group II mGlu receptors and D1-like- and D2-like receptors in the rat nucleus accumbens. Administration of the selective group II metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist APDC, which had no effect when injected alone, potentiated the locomotor response produced by the selective D1-like receptor agonist SKF 38393 but had no effect on those induced by the selective D2-like receptor agonist quinpirole (also known as LY 171555)--a compound believed to act only at D2-like presynaptic receptors when injected alone--or co-administration of SKF 38393+quinpirole--a pharmacological condition thought to stimulate both D1-like receptors and presynaptic and postsynaptic D2-like receptors. In contrast, the selective group II mGlu receptor antagonist LY 341495, which induced an increase in basal locomotor activity, showed no effect on the SKF 38393-induced locomotor response, but abolished that produced by quinpirole or SKF 38393+quinpirole. The present findings demonstrate that stimulation of group II mGlu receptors has a cooperative and potentiating action on the locomotor response induced by D1-like receptor activation, whereas blockade of group II mGlu receptors has an antagonist action on the locomotor responses induced by activation of D2-like receptors. Although these data are consistent from a pharmacological point of view, as the effects of the group II mGlu receptor antagonist LY 341495 were blocked by the group II mGlu receptor agonist APDC and conversely, the subtle neurochemical crosstalks underlying such a differential effect of group II mGlu receptors on D1-like- and D2-like DA receptors remain to be elucidated.