Total hip replacement after acetabular fracture

Acute Total Hip Arthroplasty Following Acetabular Fracture is Associated With a High Risk of Revision, Dislocation, and Periprosthetic Fracture

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between acute, subacute, and delayed arthroplasty for acetabular fractures occurring within 1 week, from 1 week to 6 months, or more than 6 months before the index total hip arthroplasty (THA), versus THA without a history of acetabular fracture as a control.

METHODS

We analyzed the records of patients undergoing primary THA who were enrolled in a national database for at least 2 years before and after the index procedure. Patients who had an initial diagnostic code for acetabular fracture occurring less than 1 week, from 1 week to 6 months, or at least more than 6 months before the THA were classified as acute THA (aTHA), subacute THA (saTHA), or delayed THA (dTHA), respectively. The control group was patients undergoing THA who did not have a history of acetabular fracture. There were 430,349 control primary THAs, 462 aTHAs, 675 saTHAs, and 1,162 dTHAs.

RESULTS

After adjusting for age, sex, region, and comorbidities, patients who had an aTHA and saTHA experienced statistically significant increased odds of revision, dislocation, and periprosthetic fracture compared to primary THA without a history of acetabular fracture. Similarly, dTHA was associated with increased odds of revision, dislocation, and periprosthetic fractures compared to primary THA. In the multivariate analysis, aTHA had statistically significant higher rates of dislocation when compared to dTHA.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who had a history of acetabular fractures undergoing aTHA, saTHA, or dTHA have significantly increased rates of revision, periprosthetic fracture, and dislocation compared to primary THA in those who did not have a history of acetabular fractures.

Mid-term Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty for Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis after Acetabular Fracture

Purpose

The prognosis of total hip replacement (THR) after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus THR following non-operative treatment of acetabular fractures is unclear. Few studies have been conducted in this regard. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to perform an assessment and compare the functional outcomes for study subjects in the ORIF and non-ORIF groups during the follow-up period compared to baseline.

Materials and Methods

This longitudinal comparative study, which included 40 patients who underwent THR for either posttraumatic arthritis after fixation of an acetabular fracture or arthritis following conservative management of a fracture, was conducted for 60 months. Twenty-four patients had undergone ORIF, and 16 patients had undergone nonoperative/conservative management for acetabular fractures. Following THR, the patients were followed up for monitoring of functional outcomes for the Harris hip score (HHS) and comparison between the ORIF and non-ORIF groups was performed.

Results

The HHS showed significant improvement in both ORIF and non-ORIF groups. At the end of the mean follow-up period, no significant variation in scores was observed between the groups, i.e., ORIF group (91.61±6.64) compared to non-ORIF group (85.74±11.56). A significantly higher number of re-interventions were required for medial wall fractures and combined fractures compared to posterior fractures (P<0.05).

Conclusion

THR resulted in improved functional outcome during follow-up in both the groups; however, the ORIF group was observed to have better functional outcome. Re-intervention was not required for any of the posterior fractures at the end of the mean follow-up period.

The outcome of conversion total hip arthroplasty following acetabular fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

BACKGROUND

Conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) is considered the main treatment plan for patients with first-line treatment failure of acetabulum fracture. This meta-analysis aims to assess the effect of the type of initial treatment and timing of surgery on the outcomes of conversion THA.

METHODS

Using PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL Cochrane were searched for articles published before October 14, 2022. Comparative studies investigating the outcome of THA following treatment failure of acetabular fracture were included. These articles were categorized into three groups, and the outcomes of treatment plans in each group were compared: (A) primary THA vs. conversion THA, (B) THA following conservative treatment vs. THA following ORIF, and (C) acute THA vs. delayed THA following prior treatment failure. Review Manager (RevMan, version 5.3) software was utilized to perform the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-four comparative studies met the inclusion criteria (reported the data of 13,373 patients). Concerning group (A), the following complications were significantly higher in conversion THA: Infection (OR [95% CI] 3.19 [2.12, 4.79]; p value < 0.00001), dislocation (OR [95% CI] 4.58 [1.56, 13.45]; p value = 0.006), heterotopic ossification (OR [95% CI] 5.68 [3.46, 9.32]; p value < 0.00001), and Revision (OR [95% CI] 2.57 [1.65, 4.01]; p value < 0.00001). Postoperative HHS (SMD [95% CI] - 0.66 [- 1.24, - 0.08]; p value = 0.03) was significantly lower and operation time (SMD [95% CI] 0.88 [0.61, 1.15]; p value < 0.00001), blood loss (SMD [95% CI] 0.83 [0.56, 1.11]; p value < 0.00001), and bone graft need (OR [95% CI] 27.84 [11.80, 65.65]; p value < 0.00001) were significantly higher in conversion THA. Regarding group (B), bone graft need (OR [95% CI] 0.48 [0.27, 0.86]; p value = 0.01) was considerably higher in patients with prior acetabular fracture conservative treatment, while other outcomes were comparable. Respecting group (C), there were no significant differences in analyzed outcomes. However, systematically reviewing existing literature suggested a higher incidence rate of DVT following acute THA.

CONCLUSION

There were significantly higher postoperative complications and lower functional outcomes in conversion THA compared to primary THA. While complications and functional outcomes were comparable between ORIF and the conservative groups, the bone graft need was significantly higher in the conservative group. There were no significant differences between aTHA and dTHA. These results can assist surgeons in designing treatment plans based on each patient's clinical situation. Prospero registration code: CRD42022385508.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III/IV.

The direct anterior approach for conversion to total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fixation is safe and effective

INTRODUCTION

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) after prior acetabular fracture repair is known to be demanding as studies have shown inferior implant survival rates and higher infection rates for these procedures. The direct anterior (DA) approach might help mitigate some of these risks by utilizing a new surgical tissue plane. However, potential criticisms of the DA approach for these surgeries include the inability to access previous acetabular implants or heterotopic ossification (HO) if they were to inhibit implant placement. The goals of this study are to analyze the efficacy of the DA approach for conversion to hip arthroplasty surgery after previous acetabular fixation.

METHODS

After reviewing all records at our institution using current procedural terminology codes, we isolated patients with previous acetabular repair who underwent conversion to THA through the DA approach. Patient records were reviewed, and patients were contacted to obtain Harris Hip Scores.

RESULTS

23 patients (16 males and 7 females) were found with a mean follow-up time of 46 months (range 16-156 months). The mean age was 50 (range 28 - 83) and mean BMI was 28.5 (range 15.2 - 39.2). The average blood loss was 400 ml (range 200 - 900). The average operative time was 140 min (range 85-200 min). In 7 cases (32%) implants were encountered during acetabular reaming but the implants were either removed entirely or removed partially with a burr so that the acetabular cup could be positioned within acceptable parameters. In 2 cases pre-operative HO was encountered and was resected. The average Harris Hip Score at final follow-up was 92 (range 75 - 100). There were no deep infections and no neurovascular injuries encountered. 2 patients (9%) underwent revision surgery for aseptic femoral stem loosening. There was 1 anterior dislocation (4.5%) at 3 days post-operatively that was successfully treated with closed reduction and maintenance of hip precautions. Otherwise, the remaining 19 (86%) patients went on to uncomplicated recovery.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest known cohort analyzing the DA approach for conversion to hip arthroplasty after previous acetabular fixation. Overall, we demonstrate that the DAA is safe for conversion THA after acetabular fixation.

Risk of Revision and Complications after Total Hip Arthroplasty for Acute Treatment of Acetabular Fracture

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) for the treatment of acute acetabular fractures may be indicated where there is high risk for failure of open reduction and internal fixation. This study aimed to determine risks of revision and rates of major complications of THA for acute acetabular fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed (all-claims data files of a large national database) by querying International Classification of Disease, tenth revision procedure codes for THA within 14 days of acetabular fracture. We identified all-cause revision and surgical complications including dislocations, mechanical failures (loosenings or broken prostheses), infections, as well as medical complications. Demographic data collected included age, sex, obesity and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Multivariate analyses evaluated the association of revision and major surgical complications after adjusting for demographic characteristics and comorbidities. We identified 956 THAs for the treatment of acute acetabular fracture from 2015 to 2020. Of all acute acetabular fractures treated with THA, 241 were concomitant with ORIF, and 715 were THA alone.

RESULTS

All-cause revision risk was 18.2%, overall major surgical complication rate 26.9%, and medical complication rate was 13.2%. Women were associated with increased risk of revision (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 1.8; Confidence Interval (CI) 1.3-2.6, P=0.001), dislocation (aOR 2.0; CI 1.5-3.1, P<0.001), mechanical complication (aOR 2.1; CI 1.4-3.2, P<0.001), and infection (aOR 1.6; CI 1.0-2.5, P=0.044).

CONCLUSION

We noted risk of all-cause revision of 18.2%, overall major surgical complication rate of 26.9%, and overall major medical complication rate of 13.2% for THA as the treatment of acute acetabular fracture. We caution against broad expansion of THA for treatment of acute acetabular fractures. Furthermore, increased risks of revision and complications in women warrant additional investigation into patient and fracture characteristics that may contribute to this finding.

Fix and replace: Simultaneous fracture fixation and hip replacement for acetabular fractures in older patients

INTRODUCTION

Displaced acetabular fractures in the elderly present significant treatment challenges. The 'fix and replace' concept involves open reduction and internal fixation of the acetabulum, providing bony stability to accept the press-fit of an acetabular cup, with a cemented femoral stem. This allows early mobilisation and the advantages this confers. This study of 57 patients treated with fix and replace describes our technique, outcomes, and survival analysis.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 57 'fix and replace' procedures in patients aged over 60 was performed. Data was collected on mechanism, fracture type, demographics, time to surgery, comorbidity index, complications, EQ-5D and Oxford hip scores (OHS). Radiographs were reviewed for fracture healing, implant loosening, cup migration, and heterotopic ossification.

RESULTS

57 patients aged 60 to 95 had fix and replace surgery. The median ASA score was 3. The mean Charlson Index was 4.8. 45 patients had a low-energy fall, 6 had a road traffic accident, 3 fell off a bicycle, and 1 mechanism was unclear. The fracture patterns were anterior column posterior hemitransverse (67%), associated both columns (9%), posterior column (9%), posterior column and posterior wall (9%), and transverse (2%). The mean time to surgery was 8.4 days (0-14). 26 out of 57 (46%) received a blood transfusion. Mean length of stay was 17.6 days (7-86). The mean follow-up was 35.5 months. 4 dislocations were treated with closed reduction, whilst 1 required excision arthroplasty. 2 infections resolved with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), whilst 1 required a two-stage revision. 1 acetabular component had migrated requiring revision. The median pre-injury OHS was 44 (26-48) compared to 37.3 (28-48) at 1 year. There were no deaths at 30-days, whilst at 1 year 7 patients had died. Kaplan Meier survival analysis showed mean survival was 1984.5 days. Implant survival was 90% at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

While fix and replace is conceptually attractive, this medically complex patient group requires considerable support peri‑ and post-operatively. Further studies are required to provide clinicians with more information to decide on how best to provide a holistic management strategy for such injuries in this frail patient cohort.

Total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fractures in the older population: timing of intervention may improve patient outcomes

PURPOSE

This study evaluates complication rates following treatment modalities of THA for acetabular fractures in the older population.

METHODS

A national insurance database was used to identify acetabular fracture patients of age > 50 who underwent THA treatment within two years of fracture. Four subgroups were identified: primary THA < 2 months after injury (acute THA), primary THA > 2 months after injury (delayed THA), simultaneous ORIF and THA, and conversion THA after ORIF (THA after ORIF). A 3:1 match was performed between these subgroups and patients undergoing THA for non-fracture causes. Patients were matched based on age, gender and the diagnosis of diabetes, hypertension, obesity or tobacco use. Complication rates were compared, including hospital readmission, revision, infection and deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

RESULTS

In total, 3807 patients met inclusion criteria and were matched with 11,421 controls. Compared to controls, acute THA and delayed THA patients had significantly increased rates of all complications (OR ranges 1.45 - 2.82, p < 0.001). Simultaneous ORIF and THA and THA after ORIF patients had significantly increased rates of revision, infection and DVT (OR ranges 1.76 - 3.96, p ranges < 0.001 - p = 0.031). Compared to delayed THA, acute THA patients had significantly higher rates of readmission (OR = 1.16, p = 0.021) and DVT (OR = 1.89, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Consistent with prior literature, THA after acetabular fracture is associated with higher complication rates than THA for non-fracture causes. Acute THA following acetabular fracture is also associated with higher rates of readmission and DVT than delayed THA.

Primary total hip replacement using Burch-Schneider cages for acetabular fractures

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporotic acetabular fractures are common and pose a difficult technical challenge for the trauma surgeon. Acute total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage with immediate postoperative weight-bearing is a method to approach these injuries. This case series reports our outcomes of acute THA using Burch-Schneider cages for acetabular fractures from a UK major trauma centre based on length of stay, radiological outcome, complications and outcome scores.

METHODS

Data were collected from all patients who underwent acute THA with a Burch-Schneider cage for acetabular fractures between June 2006 and August 2015. Patients were followed up clinically, radiologically, and using Oxford Hip Scores (OHS).

RESULTS

20 patients with a median age of 73 (range 60-90 years) were identified. All patients were independent walkers at follow-up, and had achieved radiological union. There were no dislocations, subsidence, revision or deep infections. Significant complications include 1 perioperative death as a result of complications arising from pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis; 1 deep vein thrombosis; 1 intraoperative arterial injury to the superior gluteal artery; and 1 leg-length discrepancy. Mean length of stay was 10 days. The mean OHS was 37/48 at a mean follow-up of 26 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This case series further validates the use of Burch-Schneider cages with primary THA in acute acetabular fractures.

Total hip replacements following acetabular fractures. 7 to 15 years clinical and radiological results

This study is reporting the long term clinical and radiographic results of a group of 45 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty following acetabular fractures. The study included 39 males and 6 females. The age of the patients ranged from 32 to 61 with a mean of 46.4 years. The indication for surgery was secondary osteoarthritis in 35 patients and avascular necrosis of the femoral head in the remaining ten. The follow up period ranged from 7 to 15 years with a median of 10.3 years. Uncemented total hip prostheses were used in 37 cases while 8 cases had hybrid prostheses with cemented cups and uncemented stems. Thirty patients (66.7%) needed autogenous acetabular bone grafting. There has been a statistically significant improvement from a preoperative mean Oxford hip score of 16 to a postoperative mean score of 39.8 (p < 0.001). At the end of follow up, two cases had revision for cup loosening. The complications included one case of transient sciatic nerve palsy, and two cases of heterotopic ossification. Currently, total hip replacement remains the best option for end stage post traumatic arthritis. There are technical challenges associated with this replacement surgery which the surgeon should be aware of.

Treatment of Geriatric Acetabular Fractures-A Concise Review of the Literature

Optimal management of acetabular fractures (AF) in the elderly has not been defined clearly. The incidence of such fractures is rising in the aging population. Advancements in implant technology have improved the longevity of combined or staggered total hip arthroplasty procedures for this patient population, thus allowing earlier weight bearing and continued functional independence. Perioperative/postoperative complication rates remain significantly high in all treatment arms. Overall, the best outcomes with the lowest complication rates are achieved when AF are treated by a surgeon or a team of surgeons who specialize in both orthopedic traumatology and adult reconstruction.

Total Hip Arthroplasty After Prior Acetabular Fracture: Infection Is a Real Concern

BACKGROUND

Acetabular fractures often require surgical intervention for fracture fixation and can result in premature osteoarthritis of the hip joint. This study hypothesized that total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with a prior acetabular fracture who had undergone open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is associated with a higher rate of subsequent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

METHODS

About 72 patients with a history of acetabular fracture that required ORIF, undergoing conversion THA between 2000 and 2017 at our institution, were matched based on age, gender, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, and date of surgery in a 1:3 ratio with 215 patients receiving primary THA. The mean follow-up for the conversion THA cohort was 2.9 years (range, 1-12.15) and 3.06 years (range, 1-12.96) for the primary THA.

RESULTS

Patients with a previous acetabular fracture, compared with the primary THA patients, had longer operative times, greater operative blood loss, and an increased need for allogeneic blood transfusion (26.4% vs 4.7%). Most notably, PJI rate was significantly higher in acetabular fracture group at 6.9% compared with 0.5% in the control group. Complications, such as aseptic revision, venous thromboembolism, and mortality, were similar between both groups.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates that conversion THA in patients with prior ORIF of acetabular fractures is associated with higher complication rate, in particular PJI, and less optimal outcome compared with patients undergoing primary THA. The latter findings compel us to seek and implement specific strategies that aim to reduce the risk of subsequent PJI in these patients.

Acute Total Hip Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures: A Retrospective Study With a Six-Year Follow-Up

Objectives

While open reduction and internal fixation is considered the gold standard for the treatment of acetabular fractures, it is associated with significant complications due to prolonged immobilization for elderly patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes in elderly patients treated with an acute total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Patients and methods

This retrospective study included 16 patients (10 women and 6 men) with a mean age of 80.1 years suffering from a displaced acetabular fracture after a low-energy trauma. Primary THA was performed in all cases, by the same surgeon, within a three-week period after the fracture. The Burch-Schneider reinforcement ring with a cemented cup was used in 10 patients and a jumbo acetabular cup was used in 6 patients, whereas autologous bone graft was used in all cases.

Results

With a mean follow-up of 72 months, one dislocation occurred that was treated with close reduction, and one patient developed superficial site infection that was managed conservatively with antibiotics. No periprosthetic fractures, deep infections, or other adverse events were observed. One case of asymptomatic radiographic loosening was reported and treated conservatively. And autologous bone graft was well incorporated. Clinical scores were significantly improved, and all patients were able to walk independently.

Conclusions

Acute THA for the treatment of displaced acetabular fractures in elderly patients seems to be a safe option with good functional and radiological outcomes and low complication rates, offering early mobilization and weight-bearing ability to elderly patients.

Total hip arthroplasty following acetabular fracture: a clinical and radiographic outcome analysis of 67 patients

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a challenging option for the treatment of posttraumatic arthritis due to acetabular fractures.

METHODS

The study aimed to determine the short- and mid-term clinical and radiographic results of THA following acetabular fracture. The fracture pattern, the extent of injury and the initial fracture treatment were considered to evaluate the influence of these factors on the clinical-radiographic outcome.

RESULTS

67 patients who received THA for the treatment of posttraumatic osteoarthritis after acetabular fracture between January 2007 and December 2012 were analyzed consecutively. The group consisted of 13 female (19%) and 54 male (81%) patients with a mean age of 59 (25-87) years at the time of THA. The time between acetabular injury and arthroplasty was 107 (1-504) months on average. The all-cause 8-year survival rate was 0.87% (0.76-0.93) and there were 8 revisions, half of them were due to aseptic loosening of the cup. The Harris Hip Score achieved was 75.7 ± 21.3 (26.9-100) points. Prior to THA, heterotopic ossifications were detected in 28% and after THA implantation in 42%.

CONCLUSION

The decrease of the interval between injury and arthroplasty was associated with increasing patient age (p = 0.001) and surgical treatment of the acetabular fracture (p = 0.04). Complex fracture patterns were accompanied by acetabular bone defects more often than simple patterns (p = 0.03). Overall, arthroplasty due to posttraumatic osteoarthritis after acetabular fracture resulted in decreased overall survival rates and poorer clinical outcome as compared to primary arthroplasty.

Acute total hip arthroplasty for older patients with acetabular fractures: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Multiple treatment options for acetabular fractures in geriatric patients exist. However, no large-scale studies have reported the outcomes of acute total hip arthroplasty (THA) in this patient population. We systematically evaluated all available evidence to characterize clinical outcomes, complications, and revisions of acute THA for acetabular fractures in geriatric patients.

METHODS

Meta-analysis of 21 studies of 430 acetabular fractures with mean follow-up of 44 months (range, 17-97 months). Two independent researchers searched and evaluated the databases of Ovid, Embase, and United States National Library of Medicine using a Boolean search string up to December 2019. Population demographics and complications, including presence of heterotopic ossification (HO), dislocation, infection, revision rate, neurological deficits, and venous thromboembolic event (VTE), were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Weighted mean Harris Hip Score was 83.3 points, and 20% of the patients had reported complications. The most common complication was HO, with a rate of 19.5%. Brooker grade III and IV HO rates were lower at 6.8%. Hip dislocation occurred at a rate of 6.1%, 4.1% of patients developed VTE, deep infection occurred in 3.8%, and neurological complications occurred in 1.9%. Although the revision rate was described in most studies, we were unable to perform a survival analysis because the time to each revision was described in only a few studies. The revision rate was 4.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute THA is a viable option for treatment of acetabular fracture and can result in acceptable clinical outcomes and survivorship rates in older patients but with an associated complication rate of approximately 20%. Considering the limited treatment options, THA might be a viable alternative for appropriately selected patients.

Total hip arthroplasty in acetabular fractures

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is a well-accepted treatment for established hip arthritis following acetabular fractures. If a conservatively managed or operated case progresses to non-union/mal-union failing to restore the joint integrity, it may eventually develop secondary arthritis warranting a total hip arthroplasty. Also, in recent years, acute total hip arthroplasty is gaining importance in conditions where the fracture presents with pre-existing hip arthritis, is not amenable to salvage by open reduction and internal fixation, or, a poor prognosis is anticipated following fixation. There are several surgical challenges in performing total hip arthroplasty for acetabular fractures whether acute or delayed. As a separate entity elderly patients pose a distinct challenge due to osteoporosis and need stable fixation for early weight bearing alleviating the risk of any thromboembolic event, pulmonary complications and decubitus ulcer. The aim of surgery is to restore the columns for acetabular component implantation rather than anatomic fixation. Meticulous preoperative planning with radiographs and Computed Tomography (CT) scans, adequate exposure to delineate the fracture pattern, and, availability of an array of all instruments and possible implants as backup are the key points for success. Previous implants if any should be removed only if they are in the way of cup implantation or infected. Press fit uncemented modern porous metal acetabular component with multiple screw options is the preferred implant for majority of cases. However, complex fractures may require major reconstruction with revision THA implants especially when a pelvic discontinuity is present.

Delayed total hip arthroplasty after failed treatment of acetabular fractures: an 8- to 17-year follow-up study

Background

Delayed total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a reliable procedure following failed treatment of acetabular fractures. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of the type of fracture treatment and modern ceramic bearing on the clinical outcomes of delayed THA.

Methods

Between January 1997 and January 2008, 33 patients (33 hips) underwent cementless THA after failed acetabular fractures. Twenty-one were initially treated by open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and 12 had non-ORIF. Joint articulation was either conventional metal-on-polyethylene (MOP) or ceramic-on-ceramic (COC). Intraoperative measures and preoperative and follow-up clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes were compared between the ORIF and non-ORIF groups.

Results

Surgery duration, blood loss, and transfusion requirement were greater in the ORIF group than in the non-ORIF group (p < 0.05). Significant improvement in Harris Hip Scores was seen post-surgery in both groups. However, a significant difference in the mean Harris Hip Score was not observed between the two groups (p = 0.57). Six patients in the ORIF group required acetabular reconstructive procedures to address bony defects compared to seven patients in the non-ORIF group (p = 0.09). The rate of anatomical restoration was 58.3% (7/12) in the non-ORIF group and 42.9% (9/21) in the ORIF group (p = 0.12). Radiolucent lines were observed in the MOP group and none in the COC group. Overall survival rate was similar in both groups (p = 0.85): 89.3% in the ORIF group and 87.5% in the non-ORIF group.

Conclusion

Delayed THA with previous acetabular fractures is a challenging procedure. Initial fracture treatment does not influence the outcome of delayed THA, and modern ceramic bearing has promising results in the long-term follow-up.

Total hip arthroplasty for posttraumatic osteoarthritis following acetabular fracture: A systematic review of characteristics, outcomes, and complications

PURPOSE

Posttraumatic arthritis (PTA) may develop years after acetabular fracture, hindering joint function and causing significant chronic musculoskeletal pain. Given the delayed onset of PTA, few studies have assessed outcomes of delayed total hip arthroplasty (THA) in acetabular fracture patients. This study systematically reviewed the literature for outcomes of THA in patients with PTA and prior acetabular fracture.

METHODS

Pubmed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane library were searched for articles containing the keywords "acetabular", "fracture", "arthroplasty", and "post traumatic arthritis" published between 1995 and August 2017. Studies with less than 10 patients, less than 2 years of follow-up, conference abstracts, and non-English language articles were excluded. Data on patient demographics, surgical characteristics, and outcomes of delayed THA, including implant survival, complications, need for revision, and functional scores, was collected from eligible studies.

RESULTS

With 1830 studies were screened and data from 10 studies with 448 patients were included in this review. The median patient age on date of THA was 51.5 years, ranging from 19 to 90 years. The median time from fracture to THA was 37 months, with a range of 27-74 months. Mean follow-up times ranged from 4 to 20 years. The mean Harris hip scores (HHS) improved from 41.5 pre-operatively, to 87.6 post-operatively. The most prevalent postoperative complications were heterotopic ossification (28%-63%), implant loosening (1%-24%), and infection (0%-16%). The minimum 5-year survival of implants ranged from 70% to 100%. Revision rates ranged from 2% to 32%.

CONCLUSION

Despite the difficulties associated with performing THA in patients with PTA from previous acetabular fracture (including soft tissue scarring, existing hardware, and acetabular bone loss) and the relatively high complication rates, THA in patients with PTA following prior acetabular fracture leads to significant improvement in pain and function at 10-year follow-up. Further high quality randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm the outcomes after delayed THA in these patients.

Does Total Hip Arthroplasty Reduce the Risk of Secondary Surgery Following the Treatment of Displaced Acetabular Fractures in the Elderly Compared to Open Reduction Internal Fixation? A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVES

The goal of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is to anatomically reduce the facture and maintain a congruent hip joint. However, ORIF in the elderly is technically challenging. Therefore, there are advocates for acute total hip arthroplasty (THA) in this patient population. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the rate of revision surgery in elderly patients with acetabular fractures treated with ORIF or THA. The secondary purpose was to compare patient's self-reported functional outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Two American College of Surgeons Level 1 trauma centers.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-three patients were treated with ORIF and 37 were treated with THA. The mean follow-up was 22 months (range 6-89 months). Patients were interviewed, and radiographs were examined.

INTERVENTION

Treatment of displaced acetabular fractures with either ORIF or THA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Need for reoperation. Harris Hip Score and SF-36 questionnaire.

RESULTS

Those treated with ORIF had a higher rate of reoperation (10/33, 30%) compared with those treated with THA (5/37, 14%); however, this was not statistically significant (P = 0.12). Patients reported better bodily pain scores as measured by SF-36 (48 vs. 39, P = 0.04), and a trend toward improved function as measured by patient reported Harris Hip Scores (82 vs. 63, P = 0.06) in those treated with THA compared with ORIF.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute reconstruction of acetabular fractures with THA in the geriatric population seems to compare favorably with ORIF, with a similar rate of complications, but with improved pain scores. In addition, there was a high rate of conversion to THA within 2 years of injury when patients were treated with ORIF. Acute THA as primary treatment in this patient population merits further, more controlled, comparative study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Do Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty Yield Comparable Results to Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

The incidence of hip fractures is growing with the increasing elderly population. Typically, hip fractures are treated with open reduction internal fixation, hemiarthroplasty, or total hip arthroplasty (THA). Failed hip fracture fixation is often salvaged by conversion THA. The total number of conversion THA procedures is also supplemented by its use in treating different failed surgical hip treatments such as acetabular fracture fixation, Perthes disease, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, and developmental dysplasia of the hip. As the incidence of conversion THA rises, it is important to understand the perioperative characteristics of conversion THA. Some studies have demonstrated higher complication rates in conversion THAs than primary THAs, but research distinguishing the 2 groups is still limited.

METHODS

Perioperative data for 119 conversion THAs and 251 primary THAs were collected at 2 centers. Multivariable linear regression was performed for continuous variables, multivariable logistic regression for dichotomous variables, and chi-square test for categorical variables.

RESULTS

Outcomes for conversion THAs were significantly different (P < .05) compared to primary THA and had longer hospital length of stay (average 3.8 days for conversion THA, average 2.8 days for primary THA), longer operative time (168 minutes conversion THA, 129 minutes primary THA), greater likelihood of requiring metaphysis/diaphysis fixation, and greater likelihood of requiring revision type implant components.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that conversion THAs require more resources than primary THAs, as well as advanced revision type components. Based on these findings, conversion THAs should be reclassified to reflect the greater burden borne by treatment centers.

Delayed Total Hip Arthroplasty for Failed Acetabular Fractures: The Influence of Initial Fracture Management on Outcome After Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) provides a successful salvage option for failed acetabular fractures. The complexity of arthroplasty for a failed acetabular fracture will depend on the fracture pattern and the initial management of the fracture. Our objective was to compare the midterm outcome of THA between patients who presented with failed acetabular fractures following initial surgical or nonsurgical treatment.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients underwent cementless THA ± acetabular reconstruction following failed treatment of acetabular fractures. Twenty-seven were initially treated by surgery (group A) and 20 had nonsurgical treatment (group B). Intraoperative measures, preoperative and follow-up clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The mean surgical time, blood loss, and need for blood transfusion were significantly less in group A (P < .05). Acetabular reconstruction to address cavitary or segmental defects was needed in a significantly higher number of patients in group B (P = .006). Significant improvement in modified Merle d'Aubigne and Oxford scores was seen postsurgery in both groups. Acetabular component survival with aseptic loosening as end point was 98%. Overall survival rate with infection, revision, or loosening as end point was 93% at a mean follow-up of 7 years ± 17 months.

CONCLUSION

THA for a failed acetabular fracture is greatly facilitated by initial surgical treatment. Although functional results and survivorship were similar in both groups, failed nonsurgical treatment in complex fractures is associated with migrated femoral head and extensive acetabular defects requiring complex acetabular reconstruction.

[Management of complex acetabulum fractures and their consequences]

In the structure of pelvic bone injuries, acetabular fractures are the most complex type and, according to different authors, account for up to 20% [1]. The severity of these injuries is confirmed by the fact that early descriptions of acetabular fracture were based only on the results of autopsies of patients who had suffered a combined injury. Thus, as early as 1788, Callisen reported an acetabular fracture, but without a detailed description of the nature of the injury. In 1909, Schroeder provided a detailed report of 49 cases of acetabular fractures reported in the literature. Most of them were described during autopsies of patients who died from complications associated with hemorrhagic shock or the onset of sepsis [2]. Fractures of the acetabulum in most observations are the result of high-energy impacts, usually as a result of traffic accidents; therefore, the mechanism of injury determines the combined and multiple nature of the injuries in the victims. A significant proportion of acetabular fractures (up to 60%) are accompanied by fragment displacement and dislocation of the femoral head, in which the most severe tissue changes occur [3].

Should Total Hip Arthroplasty be Performed Acutely in the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures in Elderly or Used as a Salvage Procedure Only?

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is now an increasingly common procedure for people sustaining acetabular fractures. The incidence of acetabular fractures among the elderly population is increasing, and contemporary treatment aims to avoid the risks of prolonged incumbency associated with poor bone stock for fixation or inability to comply with limited weightbearing in this patient group. The concept of acute hip arthroplasty as a treatment for acetabular fracture is, therefore, becoming more topical and relevant. Our systematic review investigates whether THAs for acetabular fractures should be performed acutely, with a short delay, or as a late procedure for posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) if it develops.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed when undertaking this systematic review. Detailed searches were performed on three different databases, using keywords, such as "acetabular fracture," "acetabular trauma," "total hip arthroplasty," "hip arthroplasty," and "hip prosthesis." Studies from 1975 to September 2016 were included in the study. All studies included in the review were independently critically appraised by two of the authors.

RESULTS

Forty three studies were included in this review. Only two of them actually compared acute and delayed THAs for acetabular fractures with the rest focusing on one or the other. Results were comparable between acute and late THAs in terms of aseptic loosening, operative time, blood loss, Harris Hip Score, and ability to mobilize postoperatively without aid. Complication rates, however, were much higher in the acute group.

CONCLUSION

Evidence based on this topic is scarce and therefore we have to be cautious about drawing a definitive conclusion. The findings of this systematic review do suggest, however, that acute THAs should be considered in elderly patients, where fixation is not possible, or when their health and ability to rehabilitate are poor. It should also be considered in patients where PTOA is very likely, or where there is already some preexisting degenerative osteoarthritis.

[The acetabulum nonunion: reconstruction and reosteosynthesis : A long-term outcome]

Acetabular nonunions are rare, especially after operative treatment of an acetabular fracture. There are only single reports of the reconstruction and therapy of acetabular nonunion. Furthermore, there are fewer reports for treatment of acetabular nonunion with a long follow-up. We report a successful revision of an acetabular nonunion after transversal fracture and previous operative intervention, as well as the long-term follow-up after revision surgery.

Outcomes of delayed total hip arthroplasty in patients with a previous ipsilateral acetabular fracture

Post-traumatic arthritis of the hip can develop in 12-57% of patients after an acetabular fracture. Once it develops, salvage treatment options include arthroplasty or arthrodesis. Delayed total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been shown to be a viable treatment option to decrease pain, improve stability and increase functional outcomes. Using cemented designs, earlier long-term studies reported satisfactory functional outcomes of delayed THA used to treat previously failed acetabular fractures. However, high aseptic loosening rates were also observed. Recent advances in cementless acetabular designs have shown comparable functional outcomes and loosening rates compared to those undergoing THA for non-traumatic arthritis. However, even with improvements in functional and radiographic outcomes, unique complications are commonly encountered in patients with previous acetabular fractures, including heterotopic bone around the hip, increased operative times and blood loss, aseptic loosening, sciatic nerve injury and dislocation. The outcomes and complications of delayed THA in patients with previous acetabular fracture will be reviewed.

Cementless Acetabular Reconstruction for Arthropathy in Old Acetabular Fractures

This study was conducted to identify the factors influencing mechanical failure of cementless acetabular reconstruction for arthropathy after operative treatment of acetabular fractures. Fifty-six patients (56 hips) undergoing cementless total hip arthroplasty were enrolled and followed for a mean of 120 months (range, 60-180 months). The 10-year survival rate, with mechanical failure (radiographic loosening or revision due to aseptic loosening) as the endpoint, was analyzed with respect to sex, age, body mass index (BMI), acetabular bone deficiency, sclerotic changes to the acetabulum, and use of the Trabecular Metal (TM) cup (Zimmer, Inc, Warsaw, Indiana). Mean 10-year survival rates of the acetabular component were as follows: 80% (range, 65%-96%) in males and 100% in females (P=.032); 77% (range, 60%-95%) in patients younger than 50 years and 91% (range, 82%-100%) in older patients (P=.027); 88% (range, 78%-98%) in patients with a BMI less than 30 kg/m(2) and 81% (range, 74%-89%) in patients with a BMI of 30 kg/m(2) or higher (P=.068); 54% (range, 32%-76%) in patients manifesting large acetabular deficiency and 90% (range, 78%-100%) in the remaining patients (P<.001); 78% (range, 65%-91%) in patients with the presence of sclerotic acetabulum and 92% (range, 86%-100%) in patients with the absence of sclerotic acetabulum (P=.022); and 82% (range, 73%-100%) in patients who received a conventional shell and 100% in patients who received the TM cup (P=.039). Male sex, age younger than 50 years, large acetabular deficiency, and sclerotic changes of the acetabulum were significant factors contributing to the mechanical failure of cementless acetabular reconstruction performed for old acetabular fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Use of the TM cup seemed able to prolong the endurance of the acetabular component in the subsequent reconstruction.

A growing problem: acetabular fractures in the elderly and the combined hip procedure

Acetabular fractures in the elderly are most frequently the result of low-energy trauma and present unique management challenges to orthopedic surgeons. Evaluation and treatment should be performed in a multidisciplinary fashion with early involvement of internal medicine subspecialists and geriatricians. Distinct fracture patterns and pre-existing osteoarthritis and osteoporosis necessitate careful preoperative planning. The role of total hip arthroplasty should also be considered when surgical treatment is indicated. The outcomes of acetabular fractures in the elderly have improved, but complications remain higher and results less satisfactory than in younger individuals. The lack of randomized controlled trials has limited the ability to establish an evidence-based treatment algorithm.

Functional outcomes after total hip arthroplasty for the acute management of acetabular fractures: 1- to 14-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

This study reports the complications and functional outcomes in patients treated acutely with combined open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and immediate total hip arthroplasty (THA) for displaced comminuted acetabular fractures.

DESIGN

Single surgeon retrospective case series.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS

Thirty-three consecutive patients (18 women; mean age, 66 years) from 1996 to 2011 with an average follow-up of 5.6 years (range, 1-14.3 years) were included in this study.

INTERVENTION

ORIF and immediate THA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Oxford Hip Score and reoperation.

METHODS

All patients had at least 1 year of telephone or clinical follow-up. Postoperative complications, reoperations, and available radiographs were reviewed.

RESULTS

Six patients died of causes unrelated to their injuries or surgery; before death, these patients had well-functioning hips. There was a 15% complication rate. At last follow-up, 94% of hips remained in situ and were functioning well. The average Oxford Hip Score at final follow-up was 17 (range, 12-32), with 93% of patients reporting good to excellent function. There was no statistical association between fracture type, age, or fixation type and outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute ORIF and immediate THA for selected acetabular fractures is a safe viable treatment option with good to excellent functional outcomes and may reduce the need for 2 separate operations in many patients. Functional outcomes are equivalent to those after primary THA for osteoarthritis. This study does not address at which age acute THA is a cost-effective treatment option.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level IV. See Instructions for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Managing acetabular fractures in the elderly with fixation and primary arthroplasty: aiming for early weightbearing

BACKGROUND

Osteoporotic acetabular fractures in the elderly are becoming more common. Regardless of treatment, most patients are managed with a period of protected weightbearing, even if a THA has been performed. We have tried to treat these patients analogously to geriatric femoral neck fractures in a way that allows immediate full weightbearing.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We determined return to mobility, length of hospital stay (LOS), radiographic outcomes, and complications in a series of elderly osteoporotic patients treated for acetabular fractures with early fracture fixation and simultaneous THA, allowing full weightbearing immediately postoperatively.

METHODS

Since 2009, one surgeon (MR) used a consistent approach for fracture fixation and THA with immediate weightbearing in all patients older than 65 years with acetabular fractures who were fit for surgery and whose injuries were deemed osteoporotic fractures (low-energy mechanisms) meeting particular radiographic criteria (significant marginal impaction or femoral head damage). Twenty-four patients met these criteria and were reviewed at a mean of 24 months (range, 8-38 months). Mean age was 77 years (range, 63-90 years), and eight patients were women. The surgical technique included plate stabilization of both acetabular columns plus simultaneous THA using a tantalum socket and a cemented femoral stem. Clinical and note reviews were conducted to ascertain return to mobility, LOS, and postoperative complications. Component migration and fracture healing were assessed on plain radiographs.

RESULTS

All patients mobilized with full weightbearing by Day 7 postoperatively. Only one patient remained dependent on a frame to mobilize at discharge. At 6 weeks, two patients already required no walking aids. At 6 months, patients were using a single stick at home at most, and all patients had managed stairs. Mean LOS was 18 days (range, 10-36 days). Radiographically, no component migration was seen in any patient. Seventeen of 24 fractures (71%) healed radiographically by 12 weeks, and all healed by 6 months. We recorded one superficial wound infection, one symptomatic deep venous thrombosis, and one in-hospital death from myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

Selected older patients with acetabular fractures may be managed using immediate weightbearing after fracture fixation and THA. However, this surgery is complex and requires a mixed skill set.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fracture: incidence of complications, reoperation rates and functional outcomes: evidence today

The outcome of THA following acetabular fracture was analyzed on 654 patients with a systematic review approach. An uncemented acetabular and femoral component was used in 80.1% and 59.8% of the cases respectively. The median Harris hip score was 88 points. In the early THA group, Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis with any loosening, osteolysis or revision as the end point revealed that the 10-year cup survival was 81% whereas in the late THA group was 76% (P=0.287). The 10-year survival was 95% for the early stems and 85% for the late ones (P=0.001). Due to their complexity these fractures should be managed in highly specializing units where the expertise of arthroplasty and trauma reconstruction is available.

Impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup after acetabular fracture

PURPOSE

Patients suffering from post traumatic osteoarthritis of the acetabulum often require a total hip arthroplasty at a relatively young age. Long-term data outcome studies for this population are lacking. We report on the long-term outcome of 20 acetabular fractures in 20 patients treated with impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup after a mean follow-up of 18 years (range, 12-26 years).

METHODS

The group consisted of 14 males (70%) and six females (30%) with an average age of 53.3 years (range, 35-75 years) at time of surgery. No patients were lost to follow-up. Four patients died and three patients underwent a revision; at review 13 patients were still living with their implant in situ. Survivorship analysis was performed at 20 years follow-up for three endpoints.

RESULTS

Survival rate with endpoint revision for any reason at 20 years postoperative was 74.7% (95% confidence interval (CI), 40-91%), 80.0% (95% CI, 41-95%) for endpoint aseptic loosening, and 63.9% (95% CI 32-84%) for endpoint radiographic failure. Three acetabular components were revised at 14.5, 15.3, and 16.7 years postoperative. Two cups failed for aseptic loosening and one cup failed due to septic loosening. The average postoperative Harris hip score was 82 (range, 56-100).

CONCLUSION

Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone grafting and the use of a cemented cup after acetabular fracture is an attractive technique with acceptable long-term results and a low complication and re-operation rate.

Acetabular fractures in the elderly treated with a primary Burch-Schneider reinforcement ring, autologous bone graft, and a total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study with a 4-year follow-up

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the clinical and radiologic outcomes in elderly patients suffering from an acetabular fracture operated with an acute primary acetabular reinforcement ring, autologous bone graft, and a total hip arthroplasty (THA).

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary care university hospital.

PATIENTS

Fifteen elderly patients (7 women) with a mean age of 76 years and a displaced acetabular fracture after a low-energy trauma were included. The fractures involved the anterior column, but no patients with associated both column fractures were included. All the patients were able to walk independently before the fracture occurred.

INTERVENTION

Primary operation with a Burch-Schneider reinforcement ring, autologous bone graft, and a THA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The patients were reviewed at 4, 12, 24, and 48 months after the fracture occurred. The outcome assessments included complications, reoperations, activity of daily living function, functional scores (Harris hip score and short musculoskeletal function assessment), health-related quality of life [EuroQol (EQ-5D) index score], and radiologic evaluation.

RESULTS

There were no prosthetic dislocations, periprosthetic fractures, deep infections, or other adverse events. There were no radiologic signs of loosening of the reinforcement ring or the prosthesis components at any of the follow up sessions, and the autologous bone graft was well incorporated in all the patients at the final follow-up. At 48 months, the mean Harris hip score was 88, the mean short musculoskeletal function assessment dysfunction score was 30, the bother score was 25, and the mean EQ-5D index score was 0.65. All the patients were able to walk independently at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of displaced anterior column, anterior column posterior hemitransverse and transverse acetabular fractures in elderly patients using a primary reinforcement ring, autologous bone graft, and a THA seems to be a safe option with good functional and radiologic outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Percutaneous column fixation and total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of acute acetabular fracture in the elderly

We used our database of primary total hip arthroplasties to identify those patients who had acetabular fractures fixed with percutaneous screws under the same anesthesia as for the arthroplasty procedure. There were 19 patients with the average follow-up of 22 months. Fourteen patients sustained the fracture secondary to a low-energy trauma, while the remaining patients were involved in a high-energy trauma accident. The mean survival time was calculated to be 2.5 ± 0.6 years for the low-energy group and 4 ± 1.4 years for the high-energy group. We believe that this unique treatment of acetabular fractures has a role in carefully selected patients and provides the necessary reduction and immediate stability of the fracture needed to ensure adequate fit for the acetabular cup in the subsequent THA.

Acute total hip replacement for acetabular fractures: a systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Immediate total hip replacement (THR) in patients with acetabular fractures is controversial because of concerns about high complication rates. The current article is a systematic review of the literature on the use of acute THR for the treatment of acetabular fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review included studies published in English between 1992 and 2012 of subjects with acetabular fracture undergoing immediate THR. Outcomes of interest included indications; clinical assessment, including walking ability; comparison with control group; associated procedures, and rate of complications, such as loosening or revision surgery.

RESULTS

This review identified six studies, of which only one included a control group. Acute THR was associated with satisfying outcomes with regard to clinical assessment and walking ability. The comparative study assessed the difference between acute THR and delayed THR in acetabular fractures: improved outcomes were observed in the delayed THR group, although the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant.

DISCUSSION

According to data reported in the literature, acute primary THR can be successful in patients with poor bone quality, combined acetabular and femoral neck fractures, or pathological fractures and concurrent osteoarthritis of the hip. Relative indications include old age, delayed presentation, substantial medical comorbidities, and pathologic obesity. Clinical outcomes with acute THR were similar to those with delayed THR. Although the results reported in the six studies reviewed here were satisfying overall, there is limited evidence in this area in the existing literature and future prospective investigations are required.

CONCLUSION

Data reported in the literature indicate that immediate THR can be successful in appropriately selected elderly patients or patients with extensive osteoporosis, combined acetabular and femoral neck fractures or pathological fractures. There is currently a limited evidence base for THR in patients with acetabular fractures; therefore, physicians' practice and expertise are the most useful tools in clinical practice.

Acute total hip arthroplasty in acetabular fractures in the elderly using the Octopus System: mid term to long term follow-up

Patients older than 55 years presenting with acetabular fractures fulfilling the criteria for acute total hip arthroplasty (THA) were included. Cementless THA was done using the Octopus System and autologous bone grafting. 15 patients were available for latest follow up. The average follow-up was 81.5 months (62-122 months). Mean Harris Hip Score was 91.1. 10 patients were walking without any support while 5 were using a cane. There were no cases of acetabular or femoral component loosening. This method of treatment is promising in the older population as there is deficiency of bone stock which may lead to fixation failures. It is, therefore, worthwhile to recommend primary THA using the Octopus system in the successful management of selected types of acetabular fractures in the elderly.

Cup-cage construct for acute fractures of the acetabulum, re-defining indications

Acetabular fractures in the elderly are challenging injuries. The use of a trabecular metal acetabular cage was investigated as the treatment option in a series of elderly patients with acetabular fractures. At a 2-year follow up, 6 elderly patients were found to have mimimum pain, increased function, and increased scores using the Merle d'Aubigné and Postel system modified by Charnley. Radiographically, the areas of morsellised autograft that surrounded the cups were seen to have incorporated uniformly well, and the acetabular fractures were healed within six months after surgery. No mechanical failure, screw breakage, loosening, or migration was noticed. This novel indication of the cup-cage construction that uses revision techniques, for selected patients and fractures, to achieve an acute stable reconstruction, should be considered as an alternative reconstruction option in elderly patients presenting with acetabular fractures.

Cementless acetabular reconstruction after acetabular fracture: a prospective, matched-cohort study

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common surgical treatment when significant joint changes and pain are present after acetabular fracture. Few series have been reported in the literature with cemented and uncemented acetabular components. The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term results of cementless acetabular components inserted in acetabula that had been altered with previous fracture and to compare these results to those of routine THA.

METHODS

Twenty-four uncemented total hip arthroplasties were performed for the treatment of posttraumatic arthritis after acetabular fracture. The mean age and follow-up was 56 years and 8.4 years, respectively. The results were compared with 48 primary uncemented total hip arthroplasties in patients with nontraumatic arthritis. Clinical assessment with Harris hip score and radiologic with special interest in the socket was made.

RESULTS

No significant difference between the two cohorts was found with regard to postoperative follow-up, perioperative transfusion requirements, reoperations, and acetabular survival. Between both cohorts, there were significant differences with regard to operative time and postoperative Harris score.

CONCLUSIONS

Cementless THA is a suitable treatment for posttraumatic arthritis after acetabular fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level III.

Total hip arthroplasty for failed treatment of acetabular fractures: a 5-year follow-up study

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains an available surgical option for failed treatment of acetabular fractures. We retrospectively analyzed 53 patients who underwent THA because of failed treatment of acetabular fractures. The mean duration of follow-up monitoring was 64 months (range, 32-123 months) in 49 patients. The average Harris hip score increased from 49.5 before surgery to 90.1 at the latest follow-up examination. Postoperative complications included 1 dislocation, 3 sciatic nerve injuries, and 3 class III instances of heterotopic ossification. There was only 1 revision due to aseptic loosening of the acetabular and femoral component. Despite the technically demanding nature of the procedure, the results of acetabular reconstruction are encouraging in these patients; complication rates are low, and patient satisfaction level is high.

THA after acetabular fracture fixation: is frozen section necessary?

BACKGROUND

Infection is uncommon after THA performed for failed acetabular fracture repair, despite a high reported incidence of culture-positive fixation implants. The use of frozen section analysis at the time of THA after acetabular fracture fixation surgery is unknown.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked whether frozen section analysis predicted occult infection after THA performed after acetabular fracture repair.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 43 of 49 patients with prior acetabular fracture fixation who had intraoperative frozen section and culture data from a conversion THA between 2002 and 2010. The average age of patients at fracture was 53 years; conversion was performed after an average of 553 days (median, 369 days; range, 51-2951 days). Five patients had an infection after acetabular fracture surgery (three deep, two superficial). At conversion we obtained an average of three frozen section specimens per patient; 10 specimens in eight patients contained greater than 10 polymorphonuclear cells/high-power field. The minimum followup was 51 days (median, 256 days; range, 51-2085 days).

RESULTS

Five patients had positive intraoperative cultures, three of whom had a positive frozen section. All patients who had prior deep infection developed positive intraoperative cultures. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of frozen section analysis were 0.60, 0.87, 0.38, and 0.94, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Infection complicating THA after acetabular fracture repair is uncommon. A history of deep infection complicating the acetabular fracture surgery was the strongest predictor of infection. Frozen section analysis has a high specificity and negative predictive value.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Total hip arthroplasty for posttraumatic arthritis after acetabular fracture

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) outcomes for posttraumatic arthritis after acetabular fracture have yielded inferior results compared to primary nontraumatic THA. Recently, improved results have been demonstrated using cementless acetabular reconstruction. Thirty-two patients underwent THA for posttraumatic arthritis after acetabular fracture; 24 were treated with open reduction internal fixation, and 8 were managed conservatively. Time from fracture to THA was 36 months (6-227 months). Average follow-up was 4.7 years (2.0-9.7 years). Harris Hip score increased from 28 (0-56) to 82 points (20-100). Six patients required revision. Five-year survival with revision, loosening, dislocation, or infection as an end point was 79%. Survival for aseptic acetabular loosening was 97%. Revision surgery correlated with nonanatomic restoration of the hip center and a history of infection (P < .05). Despite obvious challenges, advances in fracture management and cementless acetabular fixation in THA demonstrate improved results for posttraumatic arthritis following acetabular fracture.

Open reduction internal fixation and primary total hip arthroplasty of selected acetabular fractures

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to analyze the outcomes of patients treated with combined open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) for selected cases of acetabular fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

University Medical Center.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

Four hundred twenty patients underwent ORIF for displaced acetabular fractures at our institution. Twenty-one of these patients underwent ORIF and primary THA. All surgeries were performed under the direct supervision of a fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeon and a fellowship trained adult reconstructive surgeon who acted as a cosurgeon. At the time of review, 18 patients met the 1-year follow-up requirement and formed the study cohort. Mean patient age was 71 years (range 55-86 years). There was 1 transverse fracture, 1 anterior column posterior hemitransverse and 1 both-column fracture. There were 15 posterior wall fractures. Of the 15 posterior wall fractures, 1 was associated with posterior column fracture, 1 with dome fracture, 2 with transverse fractures, and 9 with femoral head impaction fracture. There were 2 patients with isolated posterior wall fractures. Clinical outcomes were analyzed using Harris hip score. Radiographs were analyzed for implant migration and loosening around the implant.

RESULTS

Of the 18 patients in the study, 14 patients were followed for more than 2 years (average 3.9 years, range 1-10.1 years). All but 1 patient healed successfully. One patient required revision and placement of a constrained prosthesis due to failure of acetabular component, 3 weeks post-index procedure. Harris hip score ranged from 78 to 99 with a mean of 88. The radiographs showed an average medial displacement of 1.2 mm (range 0-3 mm) and an average vertical displacement of 1.3 mm (range 0-4 mm). There was no radiographic evidence of acetabular component loosening, but loosening was evident on 1 uncemented femoral stem.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of acetabular fractures remains challenging particularly in the presence of severe osteopenia, comminution, or associated femoral head fracture. In appropriately selected patients, ORIF and primary THA provide an acceptable treatment option.

Total hip replacement for acetabular fractures. Results in 121 patients operated between 1983 and 2003

Total hip replacement has an important role in the treatment of acetabular fractures. Immediate total hip arthroplasty is only indicated for some rare cases but late reconstruction is performed more frequently and may follow failed non-operative or operative treatment of the original acetabular fracture.

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study is to determine the results of the use of total hip replacement for the treatment of acetabular fractures and to compare the results of the early and late reconstruction group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

121 acetabular fractures treated with total hip arthroplasty between 1983 and 2003 at the University Hospitals Gasthuisberg in Leuven, Belgium were retrospectively studied. The patients were divided into two groups. In the "early reconstruction group" total hip arthroplasty was performed as primary treatment of the acetabular fracture. In the "late reconstruction group": total hip arthroplasty was performed following failed operative or non-operative treatment of the acetabular fracture. The indications for total hip arthroplasty and the surgical technique in both the early and late reconstruction group were compared. Secondly, complications were reviewed in both groups and a functional scoring system was applied for each patient.

RESULTS

Primarily there was a significant difference in the age of the patient population of each group with a predominance for older patients in the early reconstruction group. Secondly, less revisions were performed in the early reconstruction group: 8% compared to 22% in the late reconstruction group.

DISCUSSION

The results obtained in our patient groups were compared to the results found in literature by a Medline search. In general, our results were comparable to the results found in literature but a remarkable difference was found between different authors.

CONCLUSION

Total hip replacement for acetabular fractures is rarely indicated in the acute phase. After failed treatment of an acetabular fracture, total hip replacement has to be considered as a salvage procedure. In both cases, one may not forget total hip arthroplasty is a severe intervention associated with a high number of complications.