Outpatient pediatric orthopedics. Common and important conditions

Referral patterns to a pediatric orthopedic clinic: pediatric orthopedic surgeons are primary care musculoskeletal medicine physicians

In 2004, Reeder and in 2012, Schwend reported that inappropriate nonsurgical referrals to pediatric orthopedic clinics create a misuse of resources. Additional authors have called for re-emphasis and additional training in musculoskeletal medicine for primary care physicians (PCP) to improve the confidence, knowledge and performance when managing musculoskeletal conditions. The current study compares the diagnoses referred to a pediatric orthopedic clinic with diagnoses recommended for referral by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines to determine if any improvement in the quality of referrals has occurred since Reeder and Schwend's article. A chart review of new referrals to a pediatric orthopedic clinic during a 3-month-period was performed. Data were collected on age, sex, referring diagnosis, referral source, final diagnosis and treatment. In total 230 new consults were evaluated. The referral source was a PCP in 169 (73.5%) cases, 30 (13%) self-referrals by a parent, 19 (8.3%) from another orthopedic surgeon, 9 (3.9%) from a neurologist and 3 (1.3%) from another specialist. Fifty percent of referrals met the criteria outlined in the AAP guidelines for referral to a pediatric orthopedic specialist and 48% were classified as primary care musculoskeletal conditions. During the 15 years since the publication of Reeder's study and despite a limited re-emphasis on musculoskeletal education, the percent of inappropriate referrals to a pediatric orthopedic clinic remains unchanged at 50%. We support an expanded musculoskeletal educational effort aimed at the medical, resident and pediatrician level, online decision-making aids, and implementation of a standardized referral form with the specific criteria of the AAP included.

Advanced practice physiotherapy in paediatrics: Implementation results

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of an advanced practice physiotherapist (APP) clinic in our paediatric institution and assess APP and orthopaedic surgeon satisfaction.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, all patient records from the APP clinic's second year (March 2017 to March 2018) at CHU Sainte-Justine were reviewed. These were compared with the records of patients seen by orthopaedic surgeons within the gait clinic the year before implementing the clinic. The following data were collected: demographic, professional issuing referral, reason for referral, consultation delay, clinical impression, investigation, and treatment plan. We also documented every subsequent follow-up to rule out any diagnostic change and identify surgical patients. Clinician satisfaction was assessed by the Minnesota Satisfaction and PROBES Questionnaires along with a short electronic survey.

Results

Four hundred and eighteen patients were assessed by APPs and 202 by orthopaedic surgeons. APPs managed patients independently in 92.6% of cases. Nearly 86% of patients were discharged following the initial visit, and 7.4% were referred to a physiotherapist. Only 1% of APP patients eventually required surgery compared with nearly 6% in the orthopaedic group. The mean waiting time for consultation was greater in the APP group (513.7 versus 264 days). However, there was a significant reduction in mean waiting time over the last 3 months surveyed (106.5 days).

Conclusions

The feedback from all clinicians involved was positive, with a greater mean score on the Minnesota Satisfaction and PROBES Questionnaire for APPs. The APP gait clinic appears to be an effective triage clinic.

Level of evidence

III.

Musculoskeletal Education: An Assessment of the Value of the American Academy of Pediatrics Musculoskeletal Boot Camp Course in Improving Clinical Confidence of Pediatricians Managing Common Musculoskeletal Conditions

In 2016, the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Orthopaedics established an annual Musculoskeletal (MSK) Boot Camp course to fill the gaps in MSK knowledge, performance, and outcomes for pediatricians and primary care doctors. A standardized one-day curriculum of key MSK topics was developed including short lectures, hands-on workshops, debates, live webinars, and Q&A sessions. A survey was created to evaluate attendee confidence related to diagnosing 20 common MSK conditions in children and adolescents at the beginning and end of the course. Confidence in diagnosing the conditions was gauged using a 6-point Likert-type scale. A two-sample t test was used to compare overall confidence score pre- and post-seminar. In addition, each subtopic was analyzed. The average pre-seminar confidence score was 3.92 versus 4.86 post-seminar. All categories demonstrated a statistically increased confidence score post-seminar (P < .0001). Live MSK continuing education for pediatricians is effective in improving confidence in clinical practice.

The Economic Burden of Musculoskeletal Disease in Children and Adolescents in the United States

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal conditions are among the most common and costly conditions suffered by Americans. In 2011, there was an estimated $213 billion in annual cost of direct treatment for and lost wages due to musculoskeletal disease in the United States. Data on economic burden, however, comes mostly from the adult population, with significantly less information regarding the burden of these conditions in young patients available. The purpose of this report is to provide data on the economic burden of musculoskeletal diseases in children and adolescents in the United States.

METHODS

Eleven diagnosis categories were identified, with health care visits and hospitalization data derived from ICD-9-CM codes for each of the conditions searched. The largest database utilized was the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Kids' Inpatient Database (KID). Total visits came from the KID, HCUP NEDS (emergency department), NCHS NHAMCS OP (outpatient), and NCHS NAMCS (physician office) databases. The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) child sample was additionally searched to obtain patient/parent-reported data.

RESULTS

In 2012, more than 19 million children and adolescents received treatment in medical centers, physicians' offices, and hospitals for a musculoskeletal-related condition. The most common reason for treatment (68%) was traumatic injury, followed by a pain syndrome (13%) and deformity (9%). Total hospital charges in 2012 for children and adolescents with a primary musculoskeletal-related diagnosis totaled $7.6 billion. Trauma (43%) and deformity (38%) were the major contributors to total hospital charges.

CONCLUSIONS

Although we found that hospital-related charges for musculoskeletal diseases for children and adolescents in 2012 totaled $7.6 billion, this number underestimates the total cost for all pediatric musculoskeletal conditions. Musculoskeletal conditions accounted for 5.4% of hospital charges in the pediatric population. However, only 1.4% of pediatric research funding is designated to musculoskeletal research. Going forward, the data in this report may be used to further research and to stimulate development of better methods with which to measure the direct and indirect costs of musculoskeletal conditions in children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-economic and decision analysis.

Inappropriately Timed Pediatric Orthopaedic Referrals From the Emergency Department Result in Unnecessary Appointments and Financial Burden for Patients

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal injuries are among the most common reasons for emergency department (ED) visits in the pediatric population. Many such injuries can be managed with a single follow-up outpatient visit. However, untimely (ie, premature) referrals by emergency physicians to orthopaedic surgeons are common and may inadvertently create need for a second visit, generating unnecessary expenditures. We sought to elucidate the cost of premature musculoskeletal follow-up visits to the patients, families, and the health care system.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of pediatric patients with acute musculoskeletal injuries referred from our ED (without a formal orthopaedic consult) to our outpatient clinic. Patients were retrospectively reviewed in a consecutive fashion. The appropriateness of the recommended follow-up time interval was determined for each patient, and the direct and indirect cost of the inappropriate services were calculated utilizing a combination of traditional cost accounting techniques and time-driven activity-based costing. The characteristics of patients with appropriate and untimely follow-up referrals were compared.

RESULTS

Two hundred consecutive referrals from the ED were reviewed. Overall, 96.5% of the follow-up visits recommended by the ED were premature, which led 106 (53%) patients to require a second visit to complete their clinical care. Patients who required a second visit were significantly younger (P=0.005), more likely to be male (P=0.042), more likely to have a fracture (P<0.001), and less likely to have a sprain (P<0.001) or dislocation/subluxation (P<0.001). Over 40% of second visits were accounted for by 3 diagnoses (distal radius buckle fractures, nondisplaced Salter-Harris 1 fractures of the ankle, and buckle fractures of the finger). Across the whole cohort, the total financial impact of untimely visits was $36,265.78, representing an average cost of $342.93 per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Untimely referrals for follow-up of acute pediatric musculoskeletal conditions are very common and represent a significant financial burden to patients, families, and the health care system. Over 40% of unnecessary visits resulted from just 3 diagnoses. Improved orthopaedic follow-up guidelines, particularly for these readily recognizable conditions, and feedback to referring providers may reduce poorly timed clinic visits and decrease costs in the treatment of common orthopaedic injuries in pediatric patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Associations of self-reported allergic diseases and musculoskeletal problems in children: A US population-based study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have found increased rates of musculoskeletal problems in adults with allergic disease, but whether this association holds true for children is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of bone, joint, and muscle problems in children with a history of allergic disease.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the 2007 Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models accounting for the sampling design were used to evaluate associations of bone, joint, and muscle problems with allergic diseases, such as asthma, hay fever, food allergies, and eczema. Associations were summarized with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

The survey included 91,642 individuals aged 0 to 17 years. Multivariable modeling found statistically significant associations between the number of allergic diseases and bone, joint, and muscle problems (1 allergic disease: adjusted OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.04-1.56; P = .02; 2 allergic diseases: adjusted OR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.92-3.39; P < .001; 3 allergic diseases: adjusted OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.88-3.86; P < .001; and 4 allergic diseases: adjusted OR, 4.35; 95% CI, 2.46-7.69; P < .001). Severe eczema (but not mild eczema) was associated with bone, joint, and muscle problems (adjusted OR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.64-4.81; P < .001) and with bone problems (adjusted OR, 6.08; 95% CI, 1.94-19.12; P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Self-reported allergic diseases in children were associated with bone, joint, and muscle problems, and associations strengthened with allergic disease severity and number of allergic diseases. Severe eczema may be associated with bone problems in children. Bone, joint, and muscle problems must be considered in children with severe allergic disease, and prospective studies are necessary to define this association.

Hip dysplasia in koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) at the San Diego Zoo

A retrospective/prospective radiographic study documented 55 cases of moderate to severe hip dysplasia, with varying degrees of shallowing of the acetabulum, flattening or loss of the femoral head, widening or loss of the femoral neck, and femoral diaphyseal abnormalities in northern koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) in the San Diego Zoo (San Diego, California, USA) collection. For the retrospective study, historic radiographs were examined when availble. For the prospective study, three standard views (ventrodorsal extended leg, ventrodorsal frog leg, and lateral extended leg) were used. A scoring system was developed using four areas (acetabulum, femoral head, femoral neck, and femur) and ranges of 0 to 5 (0 = not affected to 5 = severely affected) for each area, creating a total score out of 40. Scores were graded as follows: 0-2 = normal dysplasia; 3-6 = mild dysplasia; 10-19 = moderate dysplasia; and 20-40 = severe dysplasia. Thirty koalas were graded as severe, 25 koalas as moderate, and 38 koalas as excellent or mild. Affected koalas may or may not demonstrate gait abnormalities. Mild to severe degenerative joint disease may develop and symptoms may be alleviated with glucosamine/chondroitin sulfate and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The etiology of hip dysplasia in koalas is not currently understood.

Referral patterns to a pediatric orthopedic clinic: implications for education and practice

OBJECTIVE

Musculoskeletal medicine is becoming an increasingly essential part of primary care medicine. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Surgical Advisory Panel recently published voluntary guidelines to establish diagnoses that should be referred to a pediatric specialist rather than a general specialist (pediatric orthopedic surgery vs general orthopedic surgery). Given the crisis in pediatric orthopedic surgery manpower and resources, we believe that these guidelines are useful in defining appropriate referrals. The purpose of this study was to compare diagnoses that primary care pediatric providers believe commonly need referral to the AAP Guidelines for Referral to Pediatric Specialists recommendations for referral to pediatric orthopedic specialists.

METHODS

A chart review of successive new referrals (n = 286) to the pediatric orthopedic clinic during a 12-month period was conducted. The following information was collected: 1) diagnosis from referring provider, 2) diagnosis and treatment plan by the pediatric orthopedic surgeon, 3) type of referring provider (eg, pediatrician, family practitioner, resident physician, physician assistant), and 4) patient age. The referring diagnosis, final orthopedic diagnosis, and treatment plan for each patient was compared against the AAP Guidelines for Referral to Pediatric Specialists. The terms "appropriate" and "inappropriate" were used to differentiate those diagnoses that matched versus those that did not match the AAP Guidelines, respectively.

RESULTS

This analysis shows that a significant percentage (64.7%) of definitive diagnoses of referred cases were not consistent with the new AAP recommended guidelines for referral to pediatric orthopedic surgeons. In addition, a 23.8% (68 of 286) false-positive rate of referring diagnoses is noted. Cases that required no treatment or follow-up to monitor demonstrated a 32.8% (60 of 183) [(40 no treatment + 20 monitor inappropriate)/(116 no treatment + 67 monitor total)] false-positive rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Inappropriate referrals create a large use of pediatric orthopedic resources, which delays care of other, more appropriate patients. A large proportion of referrals indicated either a lack of basic textbook knowledge or lack of examination skills and appropriate diagnostic tools as demonstrated by a high number of definitive diagnosis indicating normal variants.

Emergency department evaluation and treatment of pediatric orthopedic injuries

Orthopedic injuries in children are unique in terms of the mechanisms of injury, pathophysiology, and healing. This article reviews the pediatric fracture patterns and common pediatric injuries or complaints seen in the emergency department, with an emphasis on management in the emergency department. Additionally, the approach to pediatric cervical spine injuries and child abuse will be described as it pertains to the emergency physician.