In vivo and in vitro testing for adverse drug reactions

HUME: large-scale detection of causal genetic factors of adverse drug reactions

Motivation

Adverse drug reactions are one of the major factors that affect the wellbeing of patients and financial costs of healthcare systems. Genetic variations of patients have been shown to be a key factor in the occurrence and severity of many ADRs. However, the large number of confounding drugs and genetic biomarkers for each adverse reaction case demands a method that evaluates all potential genetic causes of ADRs simultaneously.

Results

To address this challenge, we propose HUME, a multi-phase algorithm that recommends genetic factors for ADRs that are causally supported by the patient record data. HUME consists of the construction of a network from co-prevalence between significant genetic biomarkers and ADRs, a link score phase for predicting candidate relations based on the Adamic-Adar measure, and a causal refinement phase based on multiple hypothesis testing of quasi experimental designs for evaluating evidence and counter evidence of candidate relations in the patient records.

Supplementary information

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: mechanisms and best diagnostic approaches

Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DILD) is not uncommon and has many clinical patterns, ranging from benign infiltrates to life-threatening acute respiratory distress syndrome. There are two mechanisms involved in DILD, which are probably interdependent: one is direct, dose-dependent toxicity and the other is immune-mediated. Cytotoxic lung injury may result from direct injury to pneumocytes or the alveolar capillary endothelium. Drugs can induce all types of immunological reactions described by Gell and Coombs; however, most reactions in immune-mediated DILD may be T cell-mediated.

DILD can be difficult to diagnose; diagnosis is often possible by exclusion alone. Identifying the causative drug that induces an allergy or cytotoxicity is essential for preventing secondary reactions.

One method to confirm the diagnosis of a drug-induced disease is re-exposure or re-test of the drug. However, clinicians are reluctant to place patients at further risk of illness, particularly in cases with severe drug-induced diseases. Assessment of cell-mediated immunity has recently increased, because verifying the presence or absence of drug-sensitized lymphocytes can aid in confirmation of drug-induced disease. Using peripheral blood samples from drug-allergic patients, the drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST) and the leukocyte migration test (LMT) can detect the presence of drug-sensitized T cells. However, these tests do not have a definite role in the diagnosis of DILD. This study explores the potential of these new tests and other similar tests in the diagnosis of DILD and provides a review of the relevant literature on this topic.

Idiosyncratic adverse reactions to antiepileptic drugs

Idiosyncratic drug reactions may be defined as adverse effects that cannot be explained by the known mechanisms of action of the offending agent, do not occur at any dose in most patients, and develop mostly unpredictably in susceptible individuals only. These reactions are generally thought to account for up to 10% of all adverse drug reactions, but their frequency may be higher depending on the definition adopted. Idiosyncratic reactions are a major source of concern because they encompass most life-threatening effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), as well as many other reactions requiring discontinuation of treatment. Based on the underlying mechanisms, idiosyncratic reactions can be differentiated into (1) immune-mediated hypersensitivity reactions, which may range from benign skin rashes to serious conditions such as drug-related rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms; (2) reactions involving unusual nonimmune-mediated individual susceptibility, often related to abnormal production or defective detoxification of reactive cytotoxic metabolites (as in valproate-induced liver toxicity); and (3) off-target pharmacology, whereby a drug interacts directly with a system other than that for which it is intended, an example being some types of AED-induced dyskinesias. Although no AED is free from the potential of inducing idiosyncratic reactions, the magnitude of risk and the most common manifestations vary from one drug to another, a consideration that impacts on treatment choices. Serious consequences of idiosyncratic reactions can be minimized by knowledge of risk factors, avoidance of specific AEDs in subpopulations at risk, cautious dose titration, and careful monitoring of clinical response.

Allergy to betalactam antibiotics in children: a prospective follow-up study in retreated children after negative responses in skin and challenge tests

BACKGROUND

Up to 10% of the patients in whom suspected betalactam hypersensitivity (HS) has been excluded by skin and challenge tests report suspected allergic reactions during subsequent treatments with the same or very similar betalactams. It has been suggested that the reactions may result from a resensitization induced by the challenge performed at the time of the allergological work-up. However, most patients did not undergo a second allergological work-up, to determine if the reactions resulted from betalactam HS or not.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine if children diagnosed nonallergic to betalactams have tolerated subsequent treatments with the initially suspected and/or other betalactams, and, in case of a reaction, if the reaction resulted from betalactam HS.

METHODS

We sent a questionnaire concerning the clinical history of their children to the parents of 256 children previously diagnosed nonallergic to betalactams. A second allergological work-up was performed in the children reporting suspected allergic reactions during subsequent treatments with the same and/or other betalactams. Skin tests were performed with the soluble form of the suspected (or very similar) betalactams and other betalactams from the same and other classes. Skin test responses were assessed at 15-20 min (immediate), 6-8 h (semi-late) and 48-72 h (late). Oral challenge (OC) was performed in children with negative skin tests, either at the hospital (immediate and accelerated reactions), or at home (delayed reactions).

RESULTS

A response was obtained from 141 children (55.3%). Forty-eight (34%) of those children had not been treated with the betalactams for whom a diagnosis of allergy had been ruled out previously. Seven (7.5%) of the 93 children who had been treated again reported suspected allergic reactions. Skin tests and OC were performed in six of those children, and gave negative results in five children. In one child previously diagnosed nonallergic to amoxicillin associated with clavulanic acid, we diagnosed a delayed HS to clavulanic acid and a serum sickness-like disease to cefaclor. Thus, the frequency of reactions resulting from betalactam HS in children with negative skin and challenge tests is very low, and does not exceed 2.1% (2/93) if we consider that the child which refused a second allergological work-up is really allergic to betalactams.

CONCLUSION

Our results in a very large number of children show that reactions presumed to result from betalactam HS are rare in children in whom the diagnosis of betalactam allergy has been ruled out previously. Moreover, they suggest that, as shown for the initial reactions, most of the reactions during subsequent treatments are rather a consequence of the infectious diseases for whom betalactams have been prescribed than a result of betalactam HS. Finally, they suggest that the risk of resensitization by OC is very low, and do not support the notion that skin testing should be repeated in children diagnosed nonallergic to betalactams.

Reactive oxygen species generation and its role in the differential cytotoxicity of the arylhydroxylamine metabolites of sulfamethoxazole and dapsone in normal human epidermal keratinocytes

Cutaneous drug reactions (CDR) are responsible for numerous minor to life-threatening complications. Though the exact mechanism for CDR is not completely understood, evidence suggests that bioactivation of drugs to reactive oxygen or nitrogen species is an important factor in the initiation of these reactions. Several CDR-inducing drugs having an arylamine functional group, such as sulfamethoxazole (SMX) and dapsone (DDS), undergo bioactivation to reactive arylhydroxylamine metabolites. These metabolites can generate cellular oxidative stress by forming reactive oxygen species (ROS). Several studies have demonstrated a higher cytotoxicity with DDS hydroxylamine (DDS-NOH) compared to SMX hydroxylamine (SMX-NOH). To investigate the role of differential ROS generation in the higher cytotoxicity of DDS-NOH, hydroxylamine metabolites of SMX and DDS were synthesized and ROS formation by these metabolites determined. DDS-NOH and its analogues/metabolites consistently resulted in higher ROS formation as compared to SMX-NOH. However, comparison of the ROS generation and cytotoxicity of a series of arylhydroxylamine analogues of DDS did not support a simple correlation between ROS generation and cell death. Numerous ROS scavengers were found to reduce metabolite-induced ROS formation, with differences in the potency between the agents. The decrease in DDS-NOH-induced ROS generation in NHEK with ascorbic acid, N-acetylcysteine, Trolox, and melatonin was 87, 86, 44, and 16%, respectively. Similarly, the cytotoxicity and adduct formation of DDS-NOH in NHEK was reduced in the presence of ascorbic acid. In summary, these studies show that arylhydroxylamine metabolites of SMX/DDS induce ROS generation in NHEK, though such generation is not directly related to cytotoxicity.

Histopathology of drug-induced exanthems: is there a role in diagnosis of drug allergy?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cutaneous eruptions are among the most common adverse drug reactions and may often represent a challenging diagnostic problem. This review focuses on histopathological and immunohistochemical findings of drug-induced maculo-papular exanthems and discusses the value of skin biopsies and consequent histopathological examination in the diagnosis of these reactions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Data from immunohistological studies indicate that CD4+ T cells expressing cytotoxic granule proteins such as perforin and granzyme B are critically involved in the pathogenesis and contribute to the generation of typical histopathological features of drug-induced maculo-papular exanthems, i.e. an interface dermatitis with vacuolar alteration and some apoptotic basal keratinocytes. In addition, an upregulation of both type 1 (i.e. IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha) and type 2 (i.e. IL-5) cytokines has been reported. IL-5 together with other chemokines (i.e. eotaxin/CCL-11) provides an explanation for tissue eosinophilia, which may be suggestive of a drug eruption if present.

SUMMARY

There are no absolute histological or immunohistological criteria for the diagnosis of drug-induced maculo-papular exanthems and even if the observed histological changes are compatible with a drug-induced eruption, biopsy may not definitely exclude alternative causes since there is considerable overlap with features seen in other entities. In mild cases with no severe signs or symptoms and a clear temporal relationship, clinical information and the morphologic pattern of skin lesions are often sufficient for diagnosis. However, in complex and severe cases or when the precise morphology is unclear, histopathological findings may provide some clues and assist in reaching a correct diagnosis.

Recognizing drug allergy. How to differentiate true allergy from other adverse drug reactions

Proper diagnosis of adverse drug reactions, although often complicated and difficult, is important for the patient and the physician. Often the question of whether it is safe to readminister a medication is an important clinical judgment that needs to be made. Alternative medications may be less effective or have greater toxicities or cost, or both. Areas of ongoing research to improve diagnostic precision for allergic drug reactions include further understanding of the immunochemistry of allergenic medications, improvement of the reproducibility and sensitivity of relevant in vitro assays, and further validation of computer-assisted evaluation of adverse drug events. The positive and negative predictive values for these diagnostic tests need to be better defined whenever possible. At present, the primary diagnostic tool for properly assessing immunologic drug reactions remains a meticulous and detailed history obtained by an astute, knowledgeable, and motivated physician.

Progress in the understanding of the pathology and pathogenesis of cutaneous drug eruptions : implications for management

Cutaneous drug eruptions are among the most common adverse reactions to drug therapy. The etiology may reflect immunologic or nonimmunologic mechanisms, the former encompassing all of the classic Gell and Combs immune mechanisms. Cumulative and synergistic effects of drugs include those interactions of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors reflecting the alteration by one drug of the effective serum concentration of another and the functions of drugs and their metabolites that interact to evoke cutaneous and systemic adverse reactions. Recent observations include the role of concurrent infection with lymphotropic viruses and drug effects that, through the enhancement of lymphoid blast transformation and/or lymphocyte survival and the contribution of intercurrent systemic connective tissue disease syndromes, promote enhanced lymphocyte longevity and the acquisition of progressively broadening autoantibody specificities. The latter are particularly opposite to drug-induced lupus erythematosus and to drug reactions in the setting of HIV infection. Specific common types of cutaneous drug eruptions will be discussed in this review. Successful management of cutaneous drug eruptions relies upon the prompt discontinuation of the causative medication; most drug eruptions have a good prognosis after this is accomplished. Oral or topical corticosteroids can be administered to aid in the resolution of some types of eruptions. Antihistamines or anti-inflammatory agents may also be administered for some eruptions.

Serum sickness-like reaction possibly associated with meropenem use

Serum sickness-like reactions most commonly occur secondary to drug administration. We describe a serum sickness-like reaction that was possibly associated with meropenem therapy.

Haptenation of sulfonamide reactive metabolites to cellular proteins

Adverse drug reactions are a major problem complicating medical therapy. The pathogenesis of many severe adverse drug reactions, notably hypersensitivity reactions, is poorly understood. The sulfonamides are associated with severe hypersensitivity reactions. The initial pathogenesis seems to be caused by bioactivation of the parent drug to a reactive intermediate and subsequent propagation by the immune system. The determinants of the immune response are not known. We explored the formation of sulfonamide haptens in Molt-3 and HEPA 1C1C7 cells after incubation with sulfamethoxazole (SMX), the hydroxylamine of sulfamethoxazole (SMX-HA), or the nitroso of sulfamethoxazole (SMX-NO). Haptenation was demonstrated with SMX-HA and SMX-NO but not SMX; this occurred at concentrations below that associated with toxicity (significant haptenation was seen at 25 to 50 microM). Thus, haptenation occurred presumably onto viable cells. Haptenation occurred rapidly; haptenation of cell surface proteins was demonstrated within 5 min. This did not occur indiscriminately; confocal microscopy demonstrated haptenation onto specific sites on the cell membrane. We found that haptenation was significantly inhibited by thiols and other antioxidants (p < 0.05). Sulfonamide-specific haptens were rapidly internalized by what seemed to be a caveolae-dependent process. It seems that sulfonamide reactive metabolites haptenated specific cell surface proteins that are rapidly internalized. Understanding the specific protein target(s) for haptenation and how these haptens are processed will be important in understanding the immune mediation of sulfonamide hypersensitivity adverse drug reactions.

Drug allergy diagnosis in humans: possibilities and pitfalls

Due to the potential hazards of drug allergies, an early and reliable diagnosis is crucial. The use of in vivo tests is not recent but, because of the hazards of skin testing in patients with a history of anaphylaxis, they had been abandoned for a while. Recent reevaluations have shown that for some drugs, e.g. antibiotics-reliable skin tests can ensure the diagnosis of drug allergy in up to 70% of cases. Many in vitro tests based on well-defined mechanisms, e.g. the basophil degranulation test have been used for the diagnosis of totally unrelated allergic mechanisms. It is almost impossible to interpret their validity as diagnosis tools. Nevertheless, other tests, e.g. the lymphocyte transformation test which have been evaluated in well-conducted recent studies, seem to have a good predictive value. Their use is still restricted to clinical trials or research studies. A reliable clinical approach as well as a detailed examination of the drug intake remains obligatory to diagnose drug allergy. Available in vivo and in vitro tests are sometimes used to confirm the diagnosis. The sensitivity and specificity of these tests is evaluated in clinical studies. Research to improve the existing tests and to develop new diagnostic tools is still of paramount importance.

Idiosyncratic drug reactions: the reactive metabolite syndromes

Idiosyncratic drug reactions are unpredictable reactions that can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Severe reactions are often characterised by fever and internal organ involvement. Despite progress in the identification of reactive metabolites believed to be the cause of idiosyncratic reactions, the basic mechanisms remain elusive. Furthermore, because of the lack of consensus regarding definition of these syndromes, reporting, and therefore epidemiological data, are often unreliable. Research is needed to explore further the pathophysiology of these reactions, so that better diagnostic tests and treatment methods can be developed.

Cytotoxicity of sulfonamide reactive metabolites: apoptosis and selective toxicity of CD8(+) cells by the hydroxylamine of sulfamethoxazole

Treatment with sulfonamide antibiotics in HIV-infected patients is associated with a high incidence (> 40%) of adverse drug events, including severe hypersensitivity reactions. Sulfonamide reactive metabolites have been implicated in the pathogenesis of these adverse reactions. Sulfamethoxazole hydroxylamine (SMX-HA) induces lymphocyte toxicity and suppression of proliferation in vitro; the mechanism(s) of these immunomodulatory effects remain unknown. We investigated the cytotoxicity of SMX-HA via apoptosis on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and purified cell subpopulations in vitro. CD19(+), CD4(+), and CD8(+) cells were isolated from human peripheral blood by positive selection of cell surface molecules by magnetic bead separation. SMX-HA induced significant CD8(+) cell death (67 +/- 7%) at 100 microM SMX-HA, with only minimal CD4(+) cell death (8 +/- 4%). No significant subpopulation toxicity was shown when incubated with parent drug (SMX). Flow cytometry measuring phosphatidylserine externalization 24 h after treatment with 100 microM and 400 microM SMX-HA revealed 14.1 +/- 0.7% and 25. 6 +/- 4.2% annexin-positive cells, respectively, compared to 3.7 +/- 1.2% in control PBMCs treated with 400 microM SMX. Internucleosomal DNA fragmentation was observed in quiescent and stimulated PBMCs 48 h after incubation with SMX-HA. Our data show that CD8(+) cells are highly susceptible to the toxic effects of SMX-HA through enhanced cell death by apoptosis.

Recent advances in the pathology of cutaneous drug eruptions

Cutaneous reactions to drug therapy may be of either immunologic or nonimmunologic etiology. It is important that the dermatologist and pathologist be familiar with these types of cutaneous reactions. This article discusses the clinical features, pathogenesis, and histopathology of various cutaneous drug eruptions.

Comparison of the in vitro cytotoxicity of hydroxylamine metabolites of sulfamethoxazole and dapsone

The differential incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADR) between trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and dapsone might be explained, in part, by differences in the inherent toxicity of the hydroxylamine metabolites of sulfamethoxazole and dapsone. To test this hypothesis, the in vitro cytotoxicities of sulfamethoxazole hydroxylamine, dapsone hydroxylamine, and monoacetyldapsone hydroxylamine were compared using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from healthy volunteers. After 3 hr of exposure to hydroxylamine metabolites, PBMC were washed thoroughly to remove residual hydroxylamine, and viability was assessed 16 hr later by determination of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) conversion. A concentration-dependent toxicity was observed with each hydroxylamine metabolite. While dapsone hydroxylamine and monoacetyldapsone hydroxylamine were not significantly different, both showed significantly greater cytotoxic potency than sulfamethoxazole hydroxylamine (P < 0.05). This differential potency was not a function of differential stability in aqueous medium and was maintained over time. The effects of red blood cells (RBC), impermeable RBC "ghosts," and RBC lysate on hydroxylamine-induced cytotoxicity were determined using a two-compartment dialysis system. Amelioration of hydroxylamine-dependent cytotoxicity occurred when RBC were included in PBMC incubations. This apparent detoxifying effect was markedly greater using RBC lysate in comparison with impermeable "ghosts" (P < 0.05). No difference in detoxification was observed between sulfamethoxazole hydroxylamine and monoacetyldapsone hydroxylamine. Differences in the inherent cytotoxicity of their hydroxylamine metabolites do not appear to explain the differential incidence of ADR between trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and dapsone.