Lack of intersite GABA receptor subtype antagonist effects upon mu opioid receptor agonist-induced feeding elicited from either the ventral tegmental area or nucleus accumbens shell in rats

Endogenous opioid modulation of food intake and body weight: Implications for opioid influences upon motivation and addiction

This review is part of a special issue dedicated to Opioid addiction, and examines the influential role of opioid peptides, opioid receptors and opiate drugs in mediating food intake and body weight control in rodents. This review postulates that opioid mediation of food intake was an example of "positive addictive" properties that provide motivational drives to maintain opioid-seeking behavior and that are not subject to the "negative addictive" properties associated with tolerance, dependence and withdrawal. Data demonstrate that opiate and opioid peptide agonists stimulate food intake through homeostatic activation of sensory, metabolic and energy-related In contrast, general, and particularly mu-selective, opioid receptor antagonists typically block these homeostatically-driven ingestive behaviors. Intake of palatable and hedonic food stimuli is inhibited by general, and particularly mu-selective, opioid receptor antagonists. The selectivity of specific opioid agonists to elicit food intake was confirmed through the use of opioid receptor antagonists and molecular knockdown (antisense) techniques incapacitating specific exons of opioid receptor genes. Further extensive evidence demonstrated that homeostatic and hedonic ingestive situations correspondingly altered the levels and expression of opioid peptides and opioid receptors. Opioid mediation of food intake was controlled by a distributed brain network intimately related to both the appetitive-consummatory sites implicated in food intake as well as sites intimately involved in reward and reinforcement. This emergent system appears to sustain the "positive addictive" properties providing motivational drives to maintain opioid-seeking behavior.

Antagonism of GABA-B but not GABA-A receptors in the VTA prevents stress- and intra-VTA CRF-induced reinstatement of extinguished cocaine seeking in rats

Stress-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking requires corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) actions in the ventral tegmental area (VTA). However the mechanisms through which CRF regulates VTA function to promote cocaine use are not fully understood. Here we examined the role of GABAergic neurotransmission in the VTA mediated by GABA-A or GABA-B receptors in the reinstatement of extinguished cocaine seeking by a stressor, uncontrollable intermittent footshock, or bilateral intra-VTA administration of CRF. Rats underwent repeated daily cocaine self-administration (1.0 mg/kg/ing; 14 × 6 h/day) and extinction and were tested for reinstatement in response to footshock (0.5 mA, 0.5" duration, average every 40 s; range 10-70 s) or intra-VTA CRF delivery (500 ng/side) following intra-VTA pretreatment with the GABA-A antagonist, bicuculline, the GABA-B antagonist, 2-hydroxysaclofen or vehicle. Intra-VTA bicuculline (1, 10 or 20 ng/side) failed to block footshock- or CRF-induced cocaine seeking at either dose tested. By contrast, 2-hydroxysaclofen (0.2 or 2 μg/side) prevented reinstatement by both footshock and intra-VTA CRF at a concentration that failed to attenuate food-reinforced lever pressing (45 mg sucrose-sweetened pellets; FR4 schedule) in a separate group of rats. These data suggest that GABA-B receptor-dependent CRF actions in the VTA mediate stress-induced cocaine seeking and that GABA-B receptor antagonists may have utility for the management of stress-induced relapse in cocaine addicts.

GABA-A and GABA-B receptors mediate feeding elicited by the GABA-B agonist baclofen in the ventral tegmental area and nucleus accumbens shell in rats: reciprocal and regional interactions

Food intake is significantly increased following administration of GABA-B and GABA-A agonists into the nucleus accumbens (NAC) shell and ventral tegmental area (VTA) with receptor-selective antagonist pretreatment capable of blocking these responses within sites. Regional interactions in feeding studies have been evaluated by administering an antagonist in one site of interest prior to administration of the feeding-active agonist in a second site of interest and have identified important relationships, particularly for opioid-opioid interactions. To evaluate whether regional and reciprocal VTA and NAC shell interactions occur for GABA-mediated feeding, the present study examined whether feeding elicited by the GABA-B agonist, baclofen, microinjected into the NAC shell was dose-dependently blocked by pretreatment with either the GABA-B antagonist, saclofen, or the GABA-A antagonist, bicuculline, into the VTA, and then whether VTA baclofen-induced feeding was dose-dependently blocked by NAC shell pretreatment of either saclofen or bicuculline in rats. Rats were stereotaxically implanted with bilateral pairs of cannulae aimed at the VTA and NAC shell and were assessed for food intake following vehicle and baclofen (200 ng) in each site. Baclofen produced similar magnitudes of increased food intake following VTA and NAC shell treatment. Baclofen administration in the VTA and NAC shell was preceded 20 min earlier with administration of bicuculline (0, 7.5, 75, 150, 300 ng) or saclofen (0, 0.5, 1.5, 3, 5 μg) into the other site with intake measured 1, 2 and 4h after agonist treatment. VTA saclofen dose-dependently and significantly blocked feeding elicited by NAC shell baclofen. Correspondingly, NAC shell saclofen dose-dependently and significantly blocked feeding elicited by VTA baclofen, indicating a robust and bidirectional GABA-B/GABA-B receptor interaction between sites. Whereas VTA bicuculline significantly blocked the increased feeding elicited by NAC shell baclofen, NAC shell bicuculline reduced but did not block feeding elicited by VTA baclofen, indicating a unidirectional interaction GABA-B/GABA-A receptor interaction between sites. Unlike within-site receptor specificity governing the ability of GABA agonist mediation of food intake, the present study demonstrates that GABA, like opioids, employs a distributed brain network in mediating its ingestive effects, and that under certain circumstances, uses multiple receptor subtypes to underlie its regional effects.

Role of GABA B receptors in the endomorphin-1-, but not endomorphin-2-, induced dopamine efflux in the nucleus accumbens of freely moving rats

In vivo microdialysis was used to study the effects of the locally applied GABA B receptor antagonist 2-hydroxysaclofen and GABA B receptor agonist baclofen on the basal dopamine efflux as well as on the endomorphin-1- and endomorphin-2-induced dopamine efflux in the nucleus accumbens of freely moving rats. 2-Hydroxysaclofen (100 and 500 nmol) increased basal dopamine efflux. Baclofen (2.5 and 5 nmol) failed to affect basal dopamine efflux. 2-Hydroxysaclofen (1 and 10 nmol) which did not alter the basal dopamine efflux, enhanced the endomorphin-1 (25 nmol)-induced dopamine efflux. Baclofen (2.5 and 5 nmol) failed to affect endomorphin-1 (25 nmol)-induced dopamine efflux, but it counteracted the 2-hydroxysaclofen-induced increase of the endomorphin-1-elicited dopamine efflux. Neither 2-hydroxysaclofen (10 nmol) nor baclofen (5 nmol) affected the endomorphin-2 (25 nmol)-induced dopamine efflux. The doses mentioned are the total amount of drug over the infusion period that varied across the drugs (25 or 50 min). These results suggest that accumbal GABA B receptor plays an inhibitory role on the basal as well as the endomorphin-1-elicited accumbal dopamine efflux. The present results support our earlier reported notion that endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 increase accumbal dopamine efflux by different mechanisms. Finally, it is suggested that a decrease of endogenous accumbal GABA reduces the accumbal GABA B receptor-mediated GABA-ergic inhibition, enhancing thereby the accumbal dopamine efflux.

Role of GABAA receptors in the endomorphin-1-, but not endomorphin-2-, induced dopamine efflux in the nucleus accumbens of freely moving rats

In vivo microdialysis was used to study the effects of the locally applied GABA(A) receptor agonist muscimol and GABA(A) receptor antagonist bicuculline on the basal dopamine efflux as well as on the endomorphin-1- and endomorphin-2-induced dopamine efflux in the nucleus accumbens of freely moving rats. Muscimol (2500 pmol) and bicuculline (5 and 10 nmol) increased basal dopamine efflux. Bicuculline (50 pmol) inhibited the muscimol (2500 pmol)-induced dopamine efflux. Muscimol (250 pmol), but not bicuculline (50 and 500 pmol), enhanced the endomorphin-1 (25 nmol)-induced dopamine efflux. Bicuculline (50 pmol) counteracted the muscimol (250 pmol)-induced increase of the endomorphin-1-elicited dopamine efflux. Neither muscimol (25 and 250 pmol) nor bicuculline (50 and 500 pmol) affected the endomorphin-2 (25 nmol)-induced dopamine efflux. The doses mentioned are the total amount of drug over the infusion period (25 or 50 min) that varied across the drugs. The finding that muscimol and bicuculline increased basal dopamine efflux may imply that these drugs acted at different sites. It is suggested that (1) muscimol acts at GABA(A) receptors on GABA-ergic neurons that exert an inhibitory control of dopaminergic neurons and, accordingly, disinhibits these dopaminergic neurons, and that (2) bicuculline acts directly at GABA(A) receptors on dopaminergic neurons and, accordingly, removes the inhibitory control of these dopaminergic neurons. The finding that an agonist, but not antagonist, of GABA(A) receptors enhanced the endomorphin-1's effects might indicate that endomorphin-1 produced a floor effect at the level of GABA(A) receptors located on presynaptic, dopaminergic terminals. Finally, the present results support our earlier reported notion that endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 increase accumbal dopamine efflux by different mechanisms.

GABA receptor subtype antagonists in the nucleus accumbens shell and ventral tegmental area differentially alter feeding responses induced by deprivation, glucoprivation and lipoprivation in rats

GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptor agonists stimulate feeding following microinjection into the nucleus accumbens shell and ventral tegmental area, effects blocked selectively and respectively by GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptor antagonists. GABA antagonists also differentially alter opioid-induced feeding responses elicited from these sites. Although GABA agonists and antagonists have been shown to modulate feeding elicited by deprivation or glucoprivation, there has been no systematic examination of feeding elicited by homeostatic challenges following GABA antagonists in these sites. Therefore, the present study examined the dose-dependent ability of GABA(A) (bicuculline, 75-150 ng) and GABA(B) (saclofen, 1.5-3 microg) antagonists administered into the nucleus accumbens shell or ventral tegmental area upon feeding responses elicited by food deprivation (24 h), 2-deoxy-D-glucose-induced glucoprivation (500 mg/kg) or mercaptoacetate-induced lipoprivation (70 mg/kg). A site-specific effect of GABA receptor antagonism was observed for deprivation-induced feeding in that both bicuculline and saclofen administered into the nucleus accumbens shell, but not the ventral tegmental area, produced short-term (1-4 h), but not long-term (24-48 h) effects upon deprivation-induced intake without meaningfully altering body weight recovery. In contrast to the relative inability of GABA receptor antagonism in both sites to alter 2-deoxy-D-glucose-induced intake, mercaptoacetate-induced intake was eliminated by saclofen and significantly reduced by bicuculline in the nucleus accumbens shell and eliminated by both bicuculline and saclofen in the ventral tegmental area. These data reinforce the findings that GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors in the nucleus accumbens shell and ventral tegmental area are not only important in the modulation of pharmacologically induced feeding responses, but also participate in differentially mediating the short-term feeding response to food deprivation in the nucleus accumbens shell as well strongly modulating lipoprivic, but not glucoprivic feeding responses in both sites.

Reciprocal opioid-opioid interactions between the ventral tegmental area and nucleus accumbens regions in mediating mu agonist-induced feeding in rats

Feeding elicited by the mu-selective agonist, [D-Ala2, M-Phe4, Gly-ol5]-encephalin administered into the nucleus accumbens is blocked by accumbal pre-treatment with mu, delta1, delta2 and kappa, but not mu1 opioid antagonists. Correspondingly, mu-agonist-induced feeding elicited from the ventral tegmental area is blocked by ventral tegmental area pre-treatment with mu and kappa, but not delta opioid antagonists. A bi-directional opioid-opioid feeding interaction has been firmly established such that mu-agonist-induced feeding elicited from the ventral tegmental area is blocked by accumbal naltrexone, and that accumbal mu-agonist-induced feeding is blocked by naltrexone pre-treatment in the ventral tegmental area. To determine which opioid receptor subtypes mediate the regional bi-directional opioid-opioid feeding interactions between these two sites, the present study examined the dose-dependent ability of either general (naltrexone), mu (beta-funaltrexamine), kappa (nor-binaltorphamine) or delta (naltrindole) opioid antagonists administered into one site to block mu-agonist-induced feeding elicited from the other site. General, mu and kappa, but not delta opioid receptor antagonist pre-treatment in the ventral tegmental area dose-dependently reduced mu-agonist-induced feeding elicited from the nucleus accumbens. General, mu and delta, and to a lesser degree kappa, opioid receptor antagonist pre-treatment in the nucleus accumbens dose-dependently reduced mu-agonist-induced feeding elicited from the ventral tegmental area. Thus, multiple, but different opioid receptor subtypes are involved in mediating opioid-opioid feeding interactions between the nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area regions.

A bi-directional mu-opioid-opioid connection between the nucleus of the accumbens shell and the central nucleus of the amygdala in the rat

The central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) and the nucleus of the accumbens shell (NAc) have been shown to be involved in opioid-mediated feeding behavior. The present study examined whether mu-opioid signalling between the CeA and NAc affected feeding. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were fitted with one cannula placed in the CeA and two cannulae placed in the NAc, which allowed for coadministration of the mu-opioid receptor agonist [D-Ala(2), NMe-Phe(4), Gly-ol(5)]-enkephalin (DAMGO) in one site and the opioid antagonist naltrexone (NTX) in the other site. Single injection of DAMGO (2.4 nmol) into the CeA and bilateral injections of DAMGO (2.4 nmol) into the NAc stimulated feeding (P<0.05). The DAMGO-induced increase of food intake following injection into the CeA was decreased by bilateral injection of NTX (13.2 and 26.5 nmol) into the NAc at 2- and 4-h postinjections (P<0.05). In the reverse situation, the DAMGO-induced increase of food intake following injection into the NAc was decreased by injection of NTX (13.2 and 26.5 nmol) into the CeA at 1-, 2-, and 4-h postinjections (P<0.05). These results suggest that a bi-directional mu-opioid-opioid signalling pathway exists between the CeA and the NAc, which influences feeding.

Opioid receptor subtype antagonists differentially alter GABA agonist-induced feeding elicited from either the nucleus accumbens shell or ventral tegmental area regions in rats

Food intake is significantly increased by administration of either GABAA (e.g., muscimol) or GABAB (e.g., baclofen) agonists into either the shell region of the nucleus accumbens (NAC) or the ventral tegmental area (VTA); these responses are selectively blocked by pretreatment with corresponding GABAA and GABAB antagonists. Previous studies found that a single dose (5 microg) of the general opioid antagonist, naltrexone reduced feeding elicited by muscimol, but not baclofen in the NAC shell, and reduced feeding elicited by baclofen, but not muscimol in the VTA. The present study compared feeding responses elicited by either muscimol or baclofen in either the VTA and NAC shell following pretreatment with equimolar doses of selective mu (0.4, 4 microg), delta (0.4, 4 microg), or kappa (0.6, 6 microg) opioid receptor subtype antagonists. Muscimol (25 ng) and baclofen (200 microg) each significantly and equi-effectively increased food intake over 4 h following VTA or NAC shell microinjections. Muscimol-induced feeding elicited from the VTA was significantly enhanced by mu or delta antagonists, and was significantly reduced by kappa antagonists. Baclofen-induced feeding elicited from the VTA was significantly reduced by mu or kappa, but not delta antagonists. Muscimol-induced feeding elicited from the NAC was significantly reduced by either mu, kappa or delta antagonists. Baclofen-induced feeding elicited from the NAC was significantly reduced by kappa or delta, but not mu antagonists. These data indicate differential opioid receptor subtype antagonist-induced mediation of GABA receptor subtype agonist-induced feeding elicited from the VTA and NAC shell. This is consistent with previously demonstrated differential GABA receptor subtype antagonist-induced mediation of opioid-induced feeding elicited from these same sites. Thus, functional relationships exist for the elaborate anatomical and physiological interactions between these two neurochemical systems in the VTA and NAC shell.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2003

This paper is the 26th consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, now spanning over a quarter-century of research. It summarizes papers published during 2003 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior (Section 2), and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia (Section 3); stress and social status (Section 4); tolerance and dependence (Section 5); learning and memory (Section 6); eating and drinking (Section 7); alcohol and drugs of abuse (Section 8); sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (Section 9); mental illness and mood (Section 10); seizures and neurologic disorders (Section 11); electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (Section 12); general activity and locomotion (Section 13); gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (Section 14); cardiovascular responses (Section 15); respiration and thermoregulation (Section 16); and immunological responses (Section 17).

Endogenous opioids and feeding behavior: a 30-year historical perspective

This invited review, based on the receipt of the Third Gayle A. Olson and Richard D. Olson Prize for the publication of the outstanding behavioral article published in the journal Peptides in 2002, examines the 30-year historical perspective of the role of the endogenous opioid system in feeding behavior. The review focuses on the advances that this field has made over the past 30 years as a result of the timely discoveries that were made concerning this important neuropeptide system, and how these discoveries were quickly applied to the analysis of feeding behavior and attendant homeostatic processes. The discoveries of the opioid receptors and opioid peptides, and the establishment of their relevance to feeding behavior were pivotal in studies performed in the 1970s. The 1980s were characterized by the establishment of opioid receptor subtype agonists and antagonists and their relevance to the modulation of feeding behavior as well as by the use of general opioid antagonists in demonstrating the wide array of ingestive situations and paradigms involving the endogenous opioid system. The more recent work from the 1990s to the present, utilizes the advantages created by the cloning of the opioid receptor genes, the development of knockout and knockdown techniques, the systematic utilization of a systems neuroscience approach, and establishment of the reciprocity of how manipulations of opioid peptides and receptors affect feeding behavior with how feeding states affect levels of opioid peptides and receptors. The role of G-protein effector systems in opioid-mediated feeding responses, which was the subject of the prize-winning article, is then reviewed.