Influence of abdomen on respiratory mechanics in supine rabbits

Positive end-expiratory pressure titrated according to respiratory system mechanics or to ARDSNetwork table did not guarantee positive end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure in acute respiratory distress syndrome

PURPOSE

Pulmonary recruitment and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titrated according to minimal static elastance of the respiratory system (PEEP_Estat,RS) compared to PEEP set according to the ARDSNetwork table (PEEP_ARDSNetwork) as a strategy to prevent ventilator-associated lung injury (VALI) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) increases mortality. Alternatively, avoiding negative end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure has been discussed as superior PEEP titration strategy. Therefore, we tested whether PEEP_Estat,RS or PEEP_ARDSNetwork prevent negative end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure in ARDS patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirteen patients with moderate to severe ARDS were studied at PEEP_ARDSNetwork versus PEEP_Estat,RS. Patients were then grouped post hoc according to the end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure (positive or negative).

RESULTS

7 out of 13 patients showed negative end-expiratory transpulmonary pressures (Ptp-) with both strategies (PEEP_ARDSNetwork: - 5.4 ± 3.5 vs. 2.2 ± 3.7 cm H₂O, p = .005; PEEP_Estat,RS: - 3.6 ± 1.5 vs. 3.5 ± 3.3 cm H₂O, p < .001). Ptp- was associated with higher intra-abdominal pressure and lower end-expiratory lung volume with both PEEP strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS, PEEP titrated according to the minimal static elastance of the respiratory system or according to the ARDSNetwork table did not prevent negative end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure.

Chest wall mechanics and abdominal pressure during general anaesthesia in normal and obese individuals and in acute lung injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article discusses the methods available to evaluate chest wall mechanics and the relationship between intraabdominal pressure (IAP) and chest wall mechanics during general anaesthesia in normal and obese individuals, as well as in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome.

RECENT FINDINGS

The interactions between the abdominal and thoracic compartments pose a specific challenge for intensive care physicians. IAP affects respiratory system, lung and chest wall elastance in an unpredictable way. Thus, transpulmonary pressure should be measured if IAP is more than 12 mmHg or if chest wall elastance is compromised for other reasons, even though the absolute values of pleural and transpulmonary pressures are not easily obtained at bedside. We suggest defining intraabdominal hypertension (IAH) as IAP at least 20 mmHg and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) as IAP at least 20 mmHg associated with failure of one or more organs, although further studies are required to confirm this hypothesis. Additionally, in the presence of IAH, controlled mechanical ventilation should be applied and positive end-expiratory pressure individually titrated. Prophylactic open abdomen should be considered in the presence of ACS.

SUMMARY

Increased IAP markedly affects respiratory function and complicates patient management. Frequent assessment of IAP is recommended.

Pros and cons of recruitment maneuvers in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome

In patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome, a protective mechanical ventilation strategy characterized by low tidal volumes has been associated with reduced mortality. However, such a strategy may result in alveolar collapse, leading to cyclic opening and closing of atelectatic alveoli and distal airways. Thus, recruitment maneuvers (RMs) have been used to open up collapsed lungs, while adequate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels may counteract alveolar derecruitment during low tidal volume ventilation, improving respiratory function and minimizing ventilator-associated lung injury. Nevertheless, considerable uncertainty remains regarding the appropriateness of RMs. The most commonly used RM is conventional sustained inflation, associated with respiratory and cardiovascular side effects, which may be minimized by newly proposed strategies: prolonged or incremental PEEP elevation; pressure-controlled ventilation with fixed PEEP and increased driving pressure; pressure-controlled ventilation applied with escalating PEEP and constant driving pressure; and long and slow increase in pressure. The efficiency of RMs may be affected by different factors, including the nature and extent of lung injury, capability of increasing inspiratory transpulmonary pressures, patient positioning and cardiac preload. Current evidence suggests that RMs can be used before setting PEEP, after ventilator circuit disconnection or as a rescue maneuver to overcome severe hypoxemia; however, their routine use does not seem to be justified at present. The development of new lung recruitment strategies that have fewer hemodynamic and biological effects on the lungs, as well as randomized clinical trials analyzing the impact of RMs on morbidity and mortality of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients, are warranted.

Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on respiratory function and hemodynamics in patients with acute respiratory failure with and without intra-abdominal hypertension: a pilot study

INTRODUCTION

To investigate the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on respiratory function and hemodynamics in patients with acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with normal intra-abdominal pressure (IAP < 12 mmHg) and with intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH, defined as IAP >or= 12 mmHg) during lung protective ventilation and a decremental PEEP, a prospective, observational clinical pilot study was performed.

METHODS

Twenty patients with ALI/ARDS with normal IAP or IAH treated in the surgical intensive care unit in a university hospital were studied. The mean IAP in patients with IAH and normal IAP was 16 +/- 3 mmHg and 8 +/- 3 mmHg, respectively (P < 0.001). At different PEEP levels (5, 10, 15, 20 cmH2O) we measured respiratory mechanics, partitioned into its lung and chest wall components, alveolar recruitment, gas-exchange, hemodynamics, extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) and intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI).

RESULTS

We found that ALI/ARDS patients with IAH, as compared to those with normal IAP, were characterized by: a) no differences in gas-exchange, respiratory mechanics, partitioned into its lung and chest wall components, as well as hemodynamics and EVLWI/ITBVI; b) decreased elastance of the respiratory system and the lung, but no differences in alveolar recruitment and oxygenation or hemodynamics, when PEEP was increased at 10 and 15cmH2O; c) at higher levels of PEEP, EVLWI was lower in ALI/ARDS patients with IAH as compared with those with normal IAP.

CONCLUSIONS

IAH, within the limits of IAP measured in the present study, does not affect interpretation of respiratory mechanics, alveolar recruitment and hemodynamics.

Volume-related and volume-independent effects of posture on esophageal and transpulmonary pressures in healthy subjects

Ventilator management decisions in acute lung injury could be better informed with knowledge of the patient's transpulmonary pressure, which can be estimated using measurements of esophageal pressure. Esophageal manometry is seldom used for this, however, in part because of a presumed postural artifact in the supine position. Here, we characterize the magnitude and variability of postural effects on esophageal pressure in healthy subjects to better assess its significance in patients with acute lung injury. We measured the posture-related changes in relaxation volume and total lung capacity in 10 healthy subjects in four postures: upright, supine, prone, and left lateral decubitus. Then, in the same subjects, we measured static pressure-volume characteristics of the lung over a wide range of lung volumes in each posture by using an esophageal balloon catheter. Transpulmonary pressure during relaxation (PLrel) averaged 3.7 (SD 2.0) cmH2O upright and -3.3 (SD 3.2) cmH2O supine. Approximately 58% of the decrease in PLrel between the upright and supine postures was due to a corresponding decrease in relaxation volume. The remaining 2.9-cmH2O difference is consistent with reported values of a presumed postural artifact. Relaxation volumes and pressures in prone and lateral postures were intermediate. To correct estimated transpulmonary pressure for the effect of lying supine, we suggest adding 3 cmH2O (95% confidence interval: -1 to +7 cmH2O). We conclude that postural differences in estimated transpulmonary pressure at a given lung volume are small compared with the substantial range of PLrel in patients with acute lung injury.

Thoracic dimensions at maximum lung inflation in normal subjects and in patients with obstructive and restrictive lung diseases

OBJECTIVES

To compare the distribution of lung volume at total lung capacity (TLC) among adult men and women known to have normal lung function or chronic obstructive disease or restrictive lung disease (RLD).

DESIGN

Five-year retrospective study.

SETTING

Review of available clinical pulmonary function testing (PFT) reports and chest radiographs.

PATIENTS

Sixty-four patients presenting with normal PFT and chest radiograph findings (normal subjects), 26 patients with severe COPD and increased TLC (COPD group), 29 patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and increased TLC (CF group), and 19 patients with RLD with a clinical diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis and a reduced TLC (RLD group).

MEASUREMENTS

Average posteroanterior rib cage diameter (PAave), average lateral rib cage diameter (LAave), and average vertical height of the diaphragm (HDIave) were measured using radiography. Normal prediction equations were generated based on stature, body mass index (BMI), age, and sex as independent variables and then used in between-group comparisons.

RESULTS

PAave correlated positively with BMI and age but not with height, whereas LAave correlated positively with BMI and height but not with age. HDIave correlated positively with height and age but negatively with BMI. PAave and LAave were smaller and HDIave was greater in women than men having the same stature. In the COPD group and in male CF group patients, BMI was low and only HDIave was greater than in sex-, age-, and height-matched normal subjects, but in female CF group patients, only the rib cage diameters were greater than normal. In the RLD group, PAave and HDIave were smaller than predicted and inversely related to each other, but LAave was normal.

CONCLUSION

Variations in maximum lung volume caused by gender, growth, or by lung diseases are nonisotropic and entail substantial changes in chest wall shape.