Exchange of bound estrogens and antiestrogens in MCF-7 cells: evidence for ligand-induced stable configurations of the estrogen receptor

Pathological Maintenance and Evolution of Breast Cancer: The Convergence of Irreversible Biological Actions of ER Alpha

Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) is a modulator of breast cancer maintenance and evolution. Hence, analysis of underlying mechanisms by which ERα operates is of importance for the improvement of the hormonal therapy of the disease. This review focuses on the irreversible character of the mechanism of action of ERα, which also concerns other members of the steroid hormones receptors family. ERα moves in permanence between targets localized especially at the chromatin level to accomplish gene transcriptions imposed by the estrogenic ligands and specific antagonists. Receptor association as at the plasma membrane, where it interacts with other recruitment sites, extends its regulatory potency to growth factors and related peptides through activation of signal transductions pathways. If the latter procedure is suitable for the transcriptions in which the receptor operates as a coregulator of another transcription factor, it is of marginal influence with regard to the direct estrogenic regulation procedure, especially in the context of the present review. Irreversibility of the successive steps of the underlying transcription cycle guarantees maintenance of homeostasis and evolution according to vital necessities. To justify this statement, reported data are essentially described in a holistic view rather than in the context of exhaustive analysis of a molecular event contributing to a specific function as well as in a complementary perspective to elaborate new therapeutic approaches with antagonistic potencies against those tumors promoting ERα properties.

ERα dimerization: a key factor for the weak estrogenic activity of an ERα modulator unable to compete with estradiol in binding assays

Estrothiazine (ESTZ) is a weak estrogen sharing structural similarities with coumestrol. ESTZ failed to compete with [³H]17β-estradiol ([³H]17β-E₂) for binding to the estrogen receptor α (ERα), questioning its ability to interact with the receptor. However, detection by atomic force spectroscopy (AFS) of an ESTZ-induced ERα dimerization has eliminated any remaining doubts. The effect of the compound on the proliferation of ERα-positive and negative breast cancer cells confirmed the requirement of the receptor. The efficiency of ESTZ in MCF-7 cells was weak without any potency to modify the proliferation profile of estradiol and coumestrol. Growth enhancement was associated with a proteasomal degradation of ERα without substantial recruitment of LxxLL coactivators. This may be related to an unusual delay between the acquisition by the receptor of an ERE-binding capacity and the subsequent estrogen-dependent transcription. A complementary ability to enhance TPA-induced AP-1 transcription was observed, even at concentrations insufficient to activate the ERα, suggesting a partly independent mechanism. ESTZ also rapidly and transiently activated ERK1/2 likely through membrane estrogenic pathways provoking a reorganization of the actin network. Finally, the systematic absence of biological responses with an ESTZ derivative unable to induce ERα dimerization stresses the importance of this step in the action of the compound, as reported for conventional estrogens. In view of the existence of many other ERα modulators (endocrine disruptors such as, for example, pesticides, environmental contaminants or phytoestrogens) with extremely weak or similar apparent lack of binding ability, our work may appear as pilot investigation for assessing their mechanism of action.

Effects of (R,S)/(S,R)-4,5-bis(2-chloro-4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-imidazolines and (R,S)/(S,R)-2,3-bis(2-chloro-4-hydroxyphenyl)piperazines on estrogen receptor alpha level and transcriptional activity in MCF-7 cells

4,5-Diaryl-2-imidazolines (Im(s)) and 2,3-diarylpiperazines (Pip(s)) belong to the type II class of estrogens. These compounds enhance ERalpha-mediated transcription of ERE-driven reporter genes in MCF-7 cells but do not compete with [(3)H]estradiol (E(2)) for receptor binding, because of distinct anchoring modes. The present study examined whether the estrogenic action of Im(s) and Pip(s) is associated with a down regulation of ERalpha, as reported for conventional agonists. Im and Pip derivatives displaying a large spectrum of activities in three distinct ERE-dependent transactivation systems were selected for that purpose. ERalpha immunostaining as well as Western blotting analysis revealed that both classes of compounds down regulated ERalpha with an efficiency closely related to their transactivation potency. MG-132 abrogated this down regulation, pointing to a proteasomal degradation process. Im(s) and Pip(s) with strong transactivation potency also altered [(3)H]E(2) binding parameters, leading to a progressive decrease of cellular estrogen binding capacity. This property occurred largely before ERalpha down regulation and persisted even in presence of MG-132, indicating that it did not result from ERalpha breakdown but rather from a conformational change of the receptor. The additional finding that the most active agonist tested in this study enhanced the capacity of a purified ERalpha recombinant to recruit LxxLL co-activators, while its inactive counterpart failed to do so confirmed this hypothesis. Altogether, our data indicate that the association of Im(s) and Pip(s) with ERalpha elicits similar responses to conventional agonists, even if they interact with distinct residues of the binding pocket.

Role of the proteasome in the regulation of estrogen receptor alpha turnover and function in MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells

Estrogen receptor alpha (ER) turnover in MCF-7 cells was assessed by pulse chase analysis and measurement of ER steady-state level. In untreated cells, degradation of (35)S-labeled ER was characterized by a slow phase followed by a more rapid decline. Without ligand, ER elimination was totally compensated by synthesis which maintained receptor homeostasis. Estradiol (E(2)) and the pure antiestrogen RU 58,668 abolished the slow phase of ER breakdown and enhanced the degradation of neosynthesized ER, producing a low ER steady-state level. By contrast, the partial antiestrogen OH-Tam was ineffective in this respect and caused ER accumulation. Regardless of the conditions, ER breakdown was abolished by proteasome inhibition (MG-132). ER ligands decreased cell capacity to bind [(3)H]E(2), even in the presence of MG-132, indicating that the regulation of ER level and E(2) binding capacity occurs through distinct mechanisms. MG-132 partially blocked the basal transcription of an ERE-dependent reporter gene and modified the ability of E(2) to induce the expression of the latter: the hormone was unable to restore the transactivation activity measured without MG-132. RU 58,668 and OH-Tam failed to enhance the inhibitory action of MG-132, suggesting that a loss of basal ER-mediated transactivation mainly affects the stimulatory effect of estrogens. Overall, our findings reveal that ER steady state level, ligand binding capacity and transactivation potency fit in a complex regulatory scheme involving distinct mechanisms, which may be dissociated from each other under various treatments.

Mechanisms governing the accumulation of estrogen receptor alpha in MCF-7 breast cancer cells treated with hydroxytamoxifen and related antiestrogens

This study aimed at a better understanding of estrogen receptor alpha (ER) up regulation induced by partial estrogen antagonists. Effect of treatment with hydroxytamoxifen (OH-Tam) on ER level in MCF-7 cells was investigated by an approach combining ER measurement (enzyme immunoassay) and morphological demonstration (immunofluorescence). Furthermore, the influence of drug exposure on the rates of ER synthesis and degradation was assessed by determining [35S]methionine incorporated into the receptor in different experimental conditions (measurement of synthesis or pulse-chase experiments). ER up regulation was already induced by a 1-h pulse treatment with OH-Tam, thus a continuous exposure was not required. This process appeared reversible (i.e. ER accumulation due to OH-Tam rapidly vanished upon subsequent exposure to 17beta-estradiol (E2) or the pure antiestrogen RU 58668). While OH-Tam did not affect the rate of [35S]methionine incorporation into ER, it clearly caused an impairment of ER degradation (pulse-chase experiments) indicating that up regulation results from a stabilization of the receptor associated with the maintenance of its synthesis. Various tamoxifen derivatives, as well as a few related partial antiestrogens, were compared on the basis of binding ability and propensity to induce ER up regulation. A close relationship was found between both properties. Structure-activity analysis revealed that the capacity of these compounds to induce ER up regulation is associated with characteristics of their aminoalkyle side-chain, similar to those required for antiestrogenicity.

Molecular forms of the estrogen receptor in breast cancer

Estrogen receptors (ERs) of which two isoforms have been identified (alpha and beta) are subjected to phosphorylation, glycozylation, ubiquitination and other post-transcriptional conformational changes giving rise to a very high molecular heterogeneity. Partial proteolysis of these receptors, as well as their high tendency to associate within oligomeric structures, reinforces this property. Investigations demonstrated that this heterogeneity is not a biochemical artefact suggesting some biological relevance. Our purpose was to review this topic, especially with regard to ERalpha from breast cancers.

Pharmacological profile of 6,12-dihydro-3-methoxy-1-benzopyrano[3,4-b] [1,4]benzothiazin-6-one, a novel human estrogen receptor agonist

Pharmacological studies were carried out to characterize further the endocrinological profile and the binding mode to the estrogen receptor (ER) of 6,12-dihydro-3-methoxy-1-benzopyrano[3,4-b][1,4]benzothiazin-6-one (1). Binding experiments were conducted with highly purified recombinant human estrogen receptors hERa and beta. Potent estrogenic activity of compound 1 was assessed by testing its ability to down-regulate ERs and to enhance estrogen receptor element (ERE)-dependent transcription. The latest step of our work dealt with the synthesis of the 9-fluorinated derivative 15 for ionic microscopy experiments to determine the intracellular localization of compound 1. Although 1 failed to compete with [3H]E2 for binding to both ER isoforms, evidence was reported that it interacted with hERalpha in MCF-7 cells (ER down-regulation/ERE-dependent luciferase induction). Hence, an appropriate conformation of the hormone binding domain, most probably conferred by co-regulators of ER, is required for the onset of an activity of the compound 1. Estrogenic activity was weak but on the order of magnitude of that of coumestrol (slightly weaker). The synthesis of the 9-methoxylated derivative 16 and its pharmacological evaluation led us to propose a binding mode of 1 on hERalpha. Compound 1 appears to interact with ERa mainly through interactions of its 3-methoxy substituent with the residue His-524 of the hormone binding domain.

Evidence of an estrogen receptor form devoid of estrogen binding ability in MCF-7 cells

In MCF-7 breast cancer cells, hydroxytamoxifen (OH-Tam) up-regulates the estrogen receptor (ER) in a form unable to bind [(3)H]estradiol (E(2)). We show here that this property is not restricted to this antiestrogen. [(3)H]E(2) binding assays (whole cell assays, DCC assays on cell extracts) and enzyme immunoassays (Abbott) performed in parallel, establish the permanent presence of such unusual ERs in the absence of any exposure of the cells to a ligand. E(2) and the pure antiestrogen RU 58 668, which down-regulate ER, also decrease [(3)H]E(2) binding. In control cells, these ERs represent about the half of the whole receptor population; they also display a tendency to stabilize within the cell nucleus. Loss of E(2) binding ability appears irreversible, since we failed to label receptor accumulated under OH-Tam with [(3)H]E(2) or [(3)H]tamoxifen aziridine (TAZ). Cycloheximide (CHX), which blocks E(2)-induced down regulation of ER, failed to stabilize [(3)H]E(2) binding (whole cell assay) after an [(3)H]E(2) pulse (1 h), confirming that regulation of E(2) binding and peptide level are related to different regulatory mechanisms. Loss of binding ability could not be ascribed to any ER cleavage as demonstrated by Western blotting with a panel of ER antibodies raised against its various domains (67 kDa ER solely detected). We propose that loss of E(2) binding ability is related to the aging process of the receptor, i.e. it is progressively converted to a form devoted to degradation after it has accomplished its physiological role. Ligands may favor (E(2), RU 58 668) or impede (OH-Tam) this elimination process.