Donor-specific unmodified bone marrow transfusion does not facilitate intestinal engraftment after bowel transplantation in a porcine model

New insights in immunomodulation for intestinal transplantation

Tolerance is the Holy Grail of solid organ transplantation (SOT) and remains its primary challenge since its inception. In this topic, the seminal contributions of Thomas Starzl at Pittsburgh University outlined foundational principles of graft acceptance and tolerance, with chimerism emerging as a pivotal factor. Immunologically, intestinal transplantation (ITx) poses a unique hurdle due to the inherent characteristics and functions of the small bowel, resulting in increased immunogenicity. This necessitates heavy immunosuppression (IS) while IS drugs side effects cause significant morbidity. In addition, current IS therapies fall short of inducing clinical tolerance and their discontinuation has been proven unattainable in most cases. This underscores the unfulfilled need for immunological modulation to safely reduce IS-related burdens. To address this challenge, the Leuven Immunomodulatory Protocol (LIP), introduced in 2000, incorporates various pro-tolerogenic interventions in both the donor to the recipient, with the aim of facilitating graft acceptance and improving outcome. This review seeks to provide an overview of the current understanding of tolerance in ITx and outline recent advances in this domain.

The Leuven Immunomodulatory Protocol Promotes T-Regulatory Cells and Substantially Prolongs Survival After First Intestinal Transplantation

Intestinal transplantation (ITx) remains challenged by frequent/severe rejections and immunosuppression-related complications (infections/malignancies/drug toxicity). We developed the Leuven Immunomodulatory Protocol (LIP) in the lab and translated it to the clinics. LIP consists of experimentally proven maneuvers, destined to promote T-regulatory (Tregs)-dependent graft-protective mechanisms: donor-specific blood transfusion (DSBT); avoiding high-dose steroids/calcineurin-inhibitors; and minimizing reperfusion injury and endotoxin translocation. LIP was tested in 13 consecutive ITx from deceased donors (2000-2014) (observational cohort study). Recipient age was 37 years (2.8-57 years). Five-year graft/patient survival was 92%. One patient died at 9 months due to aspergillosis, another at 12 years due to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced enteropathy. Early acute rejection (AR) developed in two (15%); late AR in three (23%); all were reversible. No chronic rejection (CR) occurred. No malignancies developed and estimated glomerular filtration rate remained stable post-Tx. At last follow-up (3.5 years [0.5-12.5 years]), no donor-specific antibodies were detected and 11 survivors were total parenteral nutrition free with a Karnofsky score >90% in 8 recipients (follow-up >1 years). A high frequency of circulating CD4⁺ CD45RA^- Foxp3^hi memory Tregs was found (1.8% [1.39-2.21]), comparable to tolerant kidney transplant (KTx) recipients and superior to stable immunosuppression (IS)-KTx, KTx with CR, and healthy volunteers. In this ITx cohort we show that DSBT in a low-inflammatory/pro-regulatory environment activates Tregs at levels similar to tolerant-KTx, without causing sensitization. LIP limits rejection under reduced IS and thereby prolongs long-term survival to an extent not previously attained after ITx.

Tolerogenic Protocol for Intestinal Transplantation

Transplantation is standard therapy for many patients suffering from kidney, liver, or heart failure. In contrast, transplantation of the intestine remains a high-risk procedure, which is performed in a minority of patients with short bowel syndrome. The difficulty is the strong alloimmune response caused by intestinal grafts and the complications of the profound immunosuppression. We tested a new clinical immunomodulatory protocol using donor-specific blood transfusion, a strategy that was popular before the introduction of cyclosporine and was recently shown to promote development of regulatory cells. Low-dose steroids and low-dose tacrolimus were administered based on previous observations that tolerance requires an intact immune system, that over-immunosuppression is counterproductive, and that high doses of calcineurin inhibitors block development of regulatory cells whereas low doses promote it. Finally, inflammation within the intestinal graft was minimized to reduce the additional stimulants that the innate immunity of the transplanted intestine exert on the adaptive immune response. Under this protocol, freedom from rejection was achieved in four consecutive intestinal transplant recipients using extremely low immunosuppression.

Intestinal graft versus native liver cytokine expression in a rat model of intestinal transplantation: effect of donor-specific cell augmentation

INTRODUCTION

Immunomodulation by portal vein delivery of donor antigen reduces intestinal graft rejection. We investigated the impact of portal venous donor-specific cell augmentation (blood versus bone marrow) on cytokine expression in intestinal grafts versus native livers.

METHODS

Ten groups of intestinal transplants (brown Norway male to Lewis female rats) varied by (1). the type of donor-specific cell augmentation and (2). the use and dose of tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Tissue samples for histologic analysis and cytokine mRNA analysis were obtained at designated time points.

RESULTS

Without immunosuppression, no type of cell augmentation reduced the rate of rejection. With immunosuppression, outcome was significantly better after portal donor-specific blood transfusion (versus bone marrow infusion). Irrespective of the type of cell augmentation, severe rejection caused strong intragraft expression of IL-1alpha, IL-1beta, IFN-gamma, and TNF-alpha; liver expression mainly involved TNF-alpha. Of note, nonimmunosuppressed, cell-augmented rats showed hardly any differences in cytokine expression in their grafts versus significant increases in their native livers. With immunosuppression, bone marrow infusion (versus blood transfusion) increased intragraft cytokine expression of IL-1alpha, IL-1beta, IFN-gamma, as well as TNF-alpha, and liver expression of IL-1beta.

CONCLUSIONS

(1). Rejection and donor-specific cell augmentation independently caused differences in intragraft versus native liver cytokine expression after intestinal transplants. (2). Portal donor-specific blood transfusion (versus bone marrow infusion) lowered the incidence of rejection and diminished intragraft cytokine up-regulation. (3). In our study, TNF-alpha appeared to be the cytokine most strongly associated with rejection.

Tolerogenic protocols for intestinal transplantation

The intestine has long been considered as a "forbidden" organ to transplant [Ann. Surg. 216 (1992) 223-33]. This is due to the particularly challenging nature of the immunological conflict that an intestinal graft may cause: a particularly vigorous rejection response, in addition to the capacity to mount a graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) [Transplantation 37 (1984) 429]. Currently, the short-term success of intestinal transplantation (Itx) depends upon the chronic delivery of profound immunosuppression but this causes infection, malignancies--in particular posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD)--and direct drug toxicity. For these reasons, the results of Itx remain inferior to those of other solid organ transplants in the middle and in the long term (Intestinal Transplant Registry: www.small-bowel-transplant.org). Improved results and wider application of Itx requires the development of protocols that would facilitate acceptance of the new intestine thereby allowing to reduce the need for immunosuppression with its attending complications. Relevant experimental data and the recent evolution in the clinical strategies used to promote acceptance of intestinal grafts are reviewed.

PORTAL DONOR-SPECIFIC BLOOD TRANSFUSION AND MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL ALLOW STEROID AVOIDANCE AND TACROLIMUS DOSE REDUCTION WITH SUSTAINED LEVELS OF CHIMERISM IN A PIG MODEL OF INTESTINAL TRANSPLANTATION

BACKGROUND

In a pig model of intestinal transplantation, we previously showed that hepatic conditioning through portal donor-specific blood transfusion (pDSBT), high-dose tacrolimus (TAC), and steroids prevented rejection and increased survival Our current study tests a protocol of pDSBT, short-term mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and low-dose TAC to eliminate the use of steroids, reduce TAC dosage, and increase the level of chimerism in the peripheral blood.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four groups of outbred, mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC)-reactive pigs underwent bowel transplants and pDSBT. Immunosuppression (group 1, high-dose TAC and steroids; group 2, low-dose TAC and MMF; group 3, low-dose TAC, MMF, and aminoguanidine; group 4, low-dose TAC, MMF, and arginine) was discontinued after 28 days. RNA was extracted from intestinal graft and native liver biopsies for cytokine measurements. Chimerism levels were determined using a Q-PCR analysis.

RESULTS

Pig survival and death rates due to rejection did not significantly differ between the four groups. Chimerism levels determined by Q-PCR analysis were not different until day 28. After discontinuation of immunosuppression, we noted a trend (P = 0.15) toward higher mean chimerism levels on day 60 for groups 2, 3, and 4 (9%) vs. group 1 (0.5%). Tissue cytokine and serum nitrate levels did not significantly differ between the four groups. Attempts to modify nitric oxide synthase activity offered no added benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of pDSBT, MMF, and low-dose TAC (vs. high-dose TAC and steroids) allowed sustained levels of mixed chimerism to develop after discontinuation of immunosuppression.

Modifications in combined liver-small bowel transplantation in pigs

AIM: To introduce combined liver-small bowel transplantation in pigs.

METHODS: Eighteen transplantations in 36 large white pigs were performed. Three modifications in combined liver-small bowel transplantation model were applied: Veno-venous bypass was not used. Preservation of the donor duodenum and head of pancreas in continuity with the combined graft to avoid biliary reconstruction. The splenic vein of donor was anastomosed end-to-end with the portal vein of recipients by the formation of a “cuff”.

RESULTS: Without immunosuppressive therapy, 72-hour survival rate of the transplanted animals was 72% (13/18). Five of 18 pigs operated died of respiratory failure (3 cases) and bleeding during hepatectomy (2 cases). The longest survival time of animals was 6 days.

CONCLUSION: Our surgical modifications are feasible and reliable, which have made the transplantation in pigs simpler and less aggressive, and thus these can be used for preclinical study.

Intestinal graft versus native liver cytokine expression in a rat model of intestinal transplantation with and without donor-specific cell augmentation

BACKGROUND

Immunomodulatory strategies such as donor-specific bone marrow or blood transfusions have been used to promote engraftment after intestinal transplants. We previously showed that delivery of donor antigen via the portal vein can effectively reduce the rate of intestinal graft rejection. The purpose of our current study was to investigate the impact of donor-specific cell augmentation (blood versus bone marrow) via the portal vein on cytokine expression in intestinal grafts versus native livers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed heterotopic small intestinal transplants between male Brown-Norway (donor) and female Lewis (recipient) rats. We studied 10 groups according to the type of donor-specific cell augmentation and the use and dose of immunosuppressive therapy. For cell augmentation, donor-specific blood or bone marrow was transfused via the donor portal vein immediately before graft implantation. For immunosuppression, tacrolimus was used post-transplant at a high or low dose. Control rats received neither immunosuppression nor cell augmentation. Tissue samples for histological assessment were obtained at designated time points. RNA was extracted from intestinal graft and native liver biopsies for cytokine measurements (IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, and TNF-beta). Chimerism levels were determined using Q-PCR analysis.

RESULTS

Without concurrent immunosuppression, neither portal donor-specific blood nor bone marrow transfusion reduced the rate of rejection. With immunosuppression, outcome was significantly better after portal donor-specific blood (versus bone marrow) transfusion. Irrespective of the type of donor-specific cell augmentation, severe rejection caused strong cytokine expression in the grafts of IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, IFN-gamma, and TNF-alpha; in the native livers, mainly of TNF-alpha (with IFN-gamma showing hardly any increase). In general, rejection caused stronger cytokine expression in the grafts than in the native livers. Mild rejection correlated well with strong intragraft expression of IL-6, TNF-alpha, and TNF-beta (early rejection markers); severe rejection with IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, IFN-gamma, and TNF-alpha (late rejection markers). In addition to cell augmentation per se, the type of cell augmentation also had an impact on cytokine expression in both grafts and native livers. Cell-augmented (versus tacrolimus-treated) rats showed hardly any differences in intragraft cytokine expression, but the expression of almost all cytokines was significantly stronger in the native livers. With immunosuppression, bone marrow infusion increased intragraft cytokine expression of IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, IFN-gamma, and TNF alpha, as well as liver cytokine expression of IL-1 beta, compared to blood transfusion. This finding reflected the more advanced rejection stages in the bone marrow infused group; different types of donor-specific cell augmentation had similar effects on liver cytokine expression. In the absence of myoablative therapy, chimerism levels were low, in both cell-augmented and non-cell-augmented groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Rejection and donor-specific cell augmentation independently causes differences in intragraft versus native liver cytokine expression after intestinal transplants. Portal donor-specific blood transfusion, as compared with donor-specific bone marrow infusion, lowered the incidence of rejection and diminished intragraft cytokine up-regulation.

Complete freedom from rejection after intestinal transplantation using a new tolerogenic protocol combined with low immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

Intestinal transplantation (Itx) remains the most difficult form of transplantation. This is due to the high immunogenicity of the bowel that currently obligates Itx patients to heavy immunosuppression, which causes infection, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), and drug toxicity. Wider application of Itx depends on the development of tolerogenic strategies to promote engraftment while reducing the need for immunosuppression. We applied a strategy to clinical Itx that combines intraportal donor-specific blood transfusion with a deliberately low immunosuppression protocol (no high-dose steroids; lower tacrolimus level).

METHODS

A 55-year-old patient received a combined liver/Itx. Donor-specific whole blood was taken from the donor during procurement and transfused in the recipient portal vein after graft reperfusion. For induction immunosuppression, no intravenous bolus of steroids was given; only two doses of anti-interleukin 2 receptor antibody were administered. The patient received posttransplantation maintenance immunosuppression with lower tacrolimus levels than average (15 ng/ml first month; 5-10 ng/ml thereafter), low-dose azathioprine (1 mg/kg first to third months; 0.5 mg/kg thereafter), and low-dose steroids (Medrol 8 mg twice daily first and second months; 4 mg twice thereafter). The patient was monitored for rejection, graft-versus-host disease, infection, and PTLD. Protocol biopsy specimens were taken from the distal ileum (2 per week).

RESULTS

Clinical, endoscopic, and histologic signs of rejection did not develop. Chimerism was identified at day 28. Graft-versus-host disease was absent clinically. Chimerism was self-limiting and disappeared without modifying baseline immunosuppression and without observing a change in graft function. The patient remained free of systemic opportunistic infections, PTLD, and drug toxicity. Total parenteral nutrition was stopped at 7 weeks after transplantation. The patient remains free of total parenteral nutrition and free of rejection at 14 months after transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe an Itx patient who remained rejection free despite receiving significantly lower immunosuppression than average. We hypothesize that intraoperative immunomodulation via intraportal donor-specific blood transfusion in the absence of nonspecific overimmunosuppression promoted Itx acceptance.

Recent advances and future prospects in intestinal and multi-visceral transplantation

From an experimental procedure, intestinal transplantation (ITx) has evolved over the last 10 yr into a treatment option for patients suffering from short bowel syndrome and who develop life-threatening complications from total parenteral nutrition (TPN) (e.g. liver dysfunction, line sepsis, shortage of venous access, etc.). One-year survival rates are approximately 70% and thus similar to lung Tx. However, the intestine remains the most challenging abdominal organ to transplant. This is because of the severe immune response (mostly rejection) that is produced, and therefore the need for profound immunosuppression with its attendant complications (sepsis, lymphoma, direct drug toxicity). Unlike other organs, graft loss as a result of acute rejection can occur late after transplantation (more than 1 yr post-transplant). With regard to the actual immunosuppressive regimens, considerable experience in patient management is required to optimize outcome of those complex transplants, which are permanently at risk of rejection and infection. ITx remains an unfinished product, and the application of ITx to patients doing well on TPN warrants further research in the understanding of the rejection process, in the development of less toxic and more efficient immunosuppressive protocols, and in the development of immunomodulatory strategies, to better control rejection and thereby reduce the need for immunosuppression.

National sharing of cadaveric isolated intestinal allografts for human transplantation: a feasibility study

Most isolated intestinal graft losses are immunological. We conducted a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of national sharing of HLA no-mismatch allografts for cadaveric isolated intestinal transplantation.

METHODS

UNOS data were analyzed in a theoretical model. Part I: All solid organ donors between 1/95-8/97 who would have met criteria for bowel donation were considered potential donors for all recipients who actually received isolated intestinal transplants during this period. We then determined how many donor intestines could have been directed to no-mismatch candidates had national sharing been in place. Donor exclusion criteria were CMV+ donors to CMV- recipients, hemodynamic instability, age >50, size mismatch (donor weight greater than recipient), and obesity. Mean and median waits for transplants, as well as theoretical mean and median waits for transplants that would have occurred given national sharing, were calculated. Part II: We estimated, based on registry graft survival data, the number of intestinal transplants necessary to demonstrate a no-mismatch graft survival advantage at 2 years.

RESULTS

Part I: Although no actual cadaveric no-mismatch transplant was performed, 12-17% of patients could have received no-mismatch allografts had sharing been in place, using various donor acceptance criteria. The impact on waiting time was variable. Part II: Accepting a 15% rate of no-mismatch cases and a survival advantage of 10% at 2 years, 793 transplants would be required to prove an advantage to HLA matching at P<0.05. If the graft survival advantage were 20% at 2 years, the time to show significance would be approximately 5 years. Using early acute rejection as an endpoint could require fewer transplants (93), and only a few years to complete the study.

CONCLUSIONS

National sharing of cadaveric isolated intestinal allografts is feasible. Median waits would not be significantly increased. The time necessary to prove graft survival advantage would be considerable, but a difference in the rate of acute rejection could be seen within 2 years. Additionally, a national sharing arrangement might improve the overall outcome of isolated intestinal transplantation.

Impact of FK506 and steroids on adaptation after intestinal resection or segmental transplantation

Segmental small intestinal transplantation (SIT) using living related donors (LRD) is being evaluated as a therapy, clinically. Advantages of this technique include an increase in the donor pool, optimization of the timing of transplants, and potential immunologic benefits. However, the ability of a short segment of intestine to function after transplantation has not been investigated in large animal models. This study evaluates the impact of immunosuppression on the adaptive process and the ability of a transplanted segment of intestine to adapt. A pig model of segmental SIT was used. Animals were resected, leaving 150 cm of distal ileum (n = 5), resected and treated with FK506 (n = 4), or steroids (n = 4), or with FK506 + steroids (n = 7), or transplanted using a similar segment of ileum and treated with FK506 + steroid immunosuppression (n = 9). Animals undergoing resection, or resection plus steroid treatment, did well, gaining weight post-operatively (37% and 15% of preoperative weight, respectively). However, animals undergoing resection and treated with FK506 or FK506 + steroids did poorly, losing weight (-14% and -22% of preoperative weight, respectively) and showing significant impairment of intestinal adaptation, morphologically and functionally. Furthermore, FK506-treated animals developed inflammatory changes in the intestinal mucosa, mimicking rejection. Segmental SIT animals had a high rate of rejection (66%) and showed a similar impairment in adaptation. Hence, segmental SIT is a stringent physiological test of intestinal adaptation. FK506 appears to impair gut function after resection, either directly, or by interfering with the adaptive process. In this model of segmental SIT, FK506 and steroids at the doses tested did not provide adequate immunosuppression to prevent rejection and the graft did not function adequately to allow growth. Further studies are required to evaluate the mechanisms underlying these findings, and to determine if similar effects occur in humans.

Donor-specific portal blood transfusion in intestinal transplantation: a prospective, preclinical large animal study

BACKGROUND

Unlike in kidney and heart transplantation, the role of pretransplant donor-specific blood transfusion (DST) has not been studied prospectively in a large animal model of bowel transplantation. We investigated the impact of portal versus systemic DST on overall survival, rejection, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and infection after total (small and large) bowel transplantation in pigs.

METHODS

Mixed lymphocyte culture-reactive, outbred pigs underwent total enterectomy and orthotopic total bowel transplantation with portal vein graft drainage. One unit of donor blood was transfused via the portal or systemic circulation (according to a randomization protocol) before graft implantation was begun. We studied six groups, all of which underwent at least a total bowel transplant: group 1 (n=5) comprised nonimmunosuppressed control pigs with portal DST; group 2 (n=6), nonimmunosuppressed control pigs with systemic DST; group 3 (n=5), cyclosporine (CsA)-treated pigs with portal DST; group 4 (n=5), CsA-treated pigs with systemic DST; group 5 (n=5), tacrolimus-treated pigs with portal DST; and group 6 (n=5), tacrolimus-treated pigs with systemic DST. All immunosuppressed pigs received prednisone (2 mg/kg/day) and either CsA (to maintain levels between 250 and 350 ng/ml) or tacrolimus (to maintain levels between 10 and 30 ng/ml). Stomal biopsies and autopsies were obtained to study the incidence of rejection, GVHD, and infection.

RESULTS

Portal DST and tacrolimus-based immunosuppression resulted in the highest survival rates. At 7, 14, and 28 days after transplantation, survival rates in group 5 were 100%, 100%, and 80%; in group 6, 100%, 60%, and 40%; and in group 3, 100%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. Only the combination of portal DST and tacrolimus prevented the occurrence of, and death from, rejection. Death from rejection at 7, 14, and 28 days in group 5 was 0%, 0%, and 0%; in group 6, 0%, 33%, and 67%; and in group 3, 0%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Of note, if immunosuppression was used, the groups with portal (versus systemic) DST had a higher risk of death from infection but a lower risk of death from GVHD. Simultaneous immunologic events were noted more frequently in groups with systemic (versus portal) DST. Long-term survival was noted only in groups with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression and was more common for those with portal (versus systemic) DST.

CONCLUSIONS

Portal DST at the time of total bowel transplantation and posttransplant immunosuppression with tacrolimus prevent rejection and significantly increase graft survival. The combination of portal antigen presentation and tacrolimus needs to be studied in clinical bowel transplantation.