The role of surgery in N2 lung cancer

The Role of Lymphadenectomy in Early-Stage NSCLC

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The involvement of lymph nodes by the tumor has a strong impact on survival of patients. For this reason, lymphadenectomy plays a crucial role in the staging and prognosis of NSCLC, to define the most appropriate therapeutic strategies concerning the stage of the disease. To date, the benefit, in terms of survival, of the different extents of lymphadenectomy remains controversial in the scientific community. It is recognized that metastatic involvement of mediastinal lymph nodes in lung cancer is one of the most significant prognostic factors, in terms of survival, and it is therefore mandatory to identify patients with lymph node metastases who may benefit from adjuvant therapies, to prevent distant disease and local recurrences. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the role of lymphadenectomy in early-stage NSCLC in terms of efficacy and accuracy, comparing systematic, sampling, and lobe-specific lymph node dissection and analyzing the existing critical issue, through a search of the most relevant articles published in the last decades.

Neoadjuvant Therapy and Factors Influencing Survival in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

AIM

We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and clinicopathological characteristics in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (IIIA-IIIB), as well as the influence of the post-NAT treatment modalities on survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included patients who presented to the Dicle University Medical Oncology Clinic and received NAT for a diagnosis of locally advanced NSCLC between 2004 and 2020. Clinicopathological and radiological data of the 57 patients whose data could be retrieved from the hospital archive system were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' overall survival (OS) and failure-free survival (FFS) times and the factors influencing these times were evaluated.

RESULTS

This study included a total of 57 patients consisting of five (8.8%) females and 52 (91.2%) males. The median patient age at diagnosis was 58 (30-75) years. All patients had received four courses of chemotherapy during the neoadjuvant period. When the factors influencing OS were evaluated, the post-NAT modality was found to have a statistically significant effect on survival. FFS times were 12, 13, and 16 months in the chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and surgery arms, respectively (log-rank p=0.035). FFS was longer in those who underwent surgery (Hazard ratio (HR): 0.33, 95 % CI: 0.14-0.77, (p=0.01)). OS times were 20, 21, and 55 months in the chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and surgery arms, respectively (log-rank p=0.05). OS was longer in the arm undergoing surgery compared to the other arms (HR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.14-0.87, (p=0.02)). Five-year survival rates for the chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and surgery arms were 14.3%, 21.4%, and 40%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that achieving an operable status is the most important indicator of survival and that patients undergoing surgery have a marked advantage in OS and FFS compared with patients receiving chemoradiotherapy or palliative chemotherapy.

Systemic and Radiation Therapy Approaches for Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The treatment for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer has changed dramatically over the past several years, with consolidative immunotherapy after concurrent chemoradiation becoming the new standard of care. Five-year survival outcomes have substantially improved with this approach. Despite these advances, further improvements are needed as the majority of patients ultimately develop progression of disease. The next-generation immunotherapy trials are currently being conducted that include approaches such as concurrent immunotherapy and addition of other therapeutic agents in the concurrent and consolidative settings. Specific unmet needs continue to exist for patients who develop disease progression after concurrent chemoradiation and immunotherapy, as well as defining the best treatment for patients with driver mutations. Future directions also include refinement of radiation techniques to reduce toxicities as much as possible, as well as the use of circulating tumor DNA in the surveillance setting. The current scientific landscape shows promising approaches that may further improve outcomes for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

The Role of Surgery in Lung Cancer Treatment: Present Indications and Future Perspectives-State of the Art

Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) are different today, due to the increased use of screening programs and of innovative systemic therapies, leading to the diagnosis of earlier and pre-invasive tumors, and of more advanced and controlled metastatic tumors. Surgery for NSCLC remains the cornerstone treatment when it can be performed. The role of surgery and surgeons has also evolved because surgeons not only perform the initial curative lung cancer resection but they also accompany and follow-up patients from pre-operative rehabilitation, to treatment for recurrences. Surgery is personalized, according to cancer characteristics, including cancer extensions, from pre-invasive and local tumors to locally advanced, metastatic disease, or residual disease after medical treatment, anticipating recurrences, and patients' characteristics. Surgical management is constantly evolving to offer the best oncologic resection adapted to each NSCLC stage. Today, NSCLC can be considered as a chronic disease and surgery is a valuable tool for the diagnosis and treatment of recurrences, and in palliative conditions to relieve dyspnea and improve patients' comfort.

Intentional Segmentectomy for Clinical T1 N0 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Survival Differs by Segment

BACKGROUND

Outcomes after segmentectomy compare favorably with those after lobectomy in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether long-term outcomes vary by segmentectomy location is unclear. We investigated whether disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) differ by segmentectomy location after intentional segmentectomy for clinical T1 N0 M0 NSCLC.

METHODS

Patients who received intentional segmentectomy for cT1 N0 M0 NSCLC from 2000 to 2018 were reviewed. Patients with prior lung cancer, forced expiratory volume in 1 second of less than 50%, or R1/R2 resection were excluded. Segmentectomy groups were left (L) basilar, L segment 6, L lingula, L trisegment; right (R): basilar (R_Bas), segment 6 (R_S6), and R upper. The 5- and 10-year DFS and OS were estimated using Kaplan-Meier and compared between groups using the log-rank test. Factors associated with DFS and OS were determined using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

In total, 416 patients met the inclusion criteria. Segmentectomy groups differed with regard to surgical approach, mediastinal lymphadenectomy, lymphovascular invasion, tumor histology, margin distance, and adjuvant therapy. Long-term outcomes were worst after R_S6 resection (5-year DFS, 57.6% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 45.7%-72.7%]; OS, 66.3% [95% CI, 54.7%-80.3%]) and best after R_Bas resection (5-year DFS, 77.1% [95% CI, 59.2%-100%]; OS, 79.5% [95% CI, 60.9%-100%]). On multivariable analysis, R_S6 resection was independently associated with DFS vs R_Bas (hazard ratio, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.18-7.08; P = .02) and OS vs R_Bas (hazard ratio, 4.35; 95% CI, 1.61-11.76; P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Resection of R_S6 is independently associated with worse DFS and OS in patients receiving intentional segmentectomy for cT1 N0 M0 NSCLC and may warrant more extensive resection, complete lymph node dissection, and closer postoperative surveillance.

Resectable IIIA-N2 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): In Search for the Proper Treatment

Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer accounts for one third of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at the time of initial diagnosis and presents with a wide range of clinical and pathological heterogeneity. To date, the combined multimodality approach involving both local and systemic control is the gold standard for these patients, since occult distant micrometastatic disease should always be suspected. With the rapid increase in treatment options, the need for an interdisciplinary discussion involving oncologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists and radiologists has become essential. Surgery should be recommended to patients with non-bulky, discrete, or single-level N2 involvement and be included in the multimodality treatment. Resectable stage IIIA patients have been the subject of a number of clinical trials and retrospective analysis, discussing the efficiency and survival benefits on patients treated with the available therapeutic approaches. However, most of them have some limitations due to their retrospective nature, lack of exact pretreatment staging, and the involvement of heterogeneous populations leading to the awareness that each patient should undergo a tailored therapy in light of the nature of his tumor, its extension and his performance status.

Salvage surgery after chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy including SBRT and proton therapy: A consecutive analysis of 38 patients

BACKGROUND

Local recurrence after definitive chemoradiation therapy, chemotherapy or radiotherapy with curative intent is often seen in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. We evaluated the feasibility of salvage pulmonary resection after definitive non-surgical treatments and the postoperative morbidity and mortality rates.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the characteristics and medical courses of patients who had undergone salvage pulmonary resections after local relapse or progression between January 2000 and March 2018 at the National Cancer Centre Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. All the candidates were evaluated, and curability by surgical resection was assessed by a multidisciplinary tumor board.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patient received salvage surgery: 26 of the patients were men, and the median age was 64.5 years (range, 20-78 years). Among these 38 patients, salvage lung resection was performed after chemoradiotherapy in 23 patients, after chemotherapy in 9 patients, and after radiotherapy with curative intent in 6 patients. The surgical resection methods were as follows: 26 lobectomies (2 bilobectomy, 15 right upper, 5 right lower, 1 right middle, 2 left lower and 1 left upper), 8 pneumonectomies (5 left and 3 right), and 4 segmentectomies. A complete resection (R0 resection) was achieved in 35 cases (92.1 %). Postoperative complications were observed in 3 patients (prolonged air leakage, bronchopleural fistula and surgical site infection in 1 patient each). No postoperative deaths occurred within 30 days after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Along with better outcomes after definitive chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, the frequency of salvage surgery has been increasing in recent years. Salvage pulmonary resections after definitive non-surgical treatments with curative intent are feasible with an acceptable morbidity rate and oncological outcomes in thoroughly assessed patients.

Efficacy of erlotinib as neoadjuvant regimen in EGFR-mutant locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

Background

The optimal neoadjuvant regimen for locally advanced resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. EGFR inhibitors have significantly improved survival in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC. However, their efficacy in neoadjuvant settings, particularly for treating locally advanced NSCLC, remains unclear. We compared the clinical benefits of chemotherapy and erlotinib as neoadjuvant therapy for stage IIIA NSCLC.

Method

Thirty-one treatment-naïve Chinese patients with stage IIIA NSCLC were enrolled. Patients without EGFR mutation received cisplatin-based doublet chemotherapy (n = 16; N-chemo group) while EGFR-mutant patients received erlotinib (n = 15; N-TKI group) as neoadjuvant therapy.

Results

After completing neoadjuvant treatment, 12 and 8 patients from the N-TKI and N-chemo groups underwent surgery, respectively. Our data revealed that patients who received erlotinib had a marginally better clinical objective response rate (67% vs. 19%), pathological response rate (67% vs. 38%), and overall survival (51.0 months vs. 20.9 months) compared with those who received chemotherapy. Furthermore, patients in the N-TKI group had a significantly greater reduction in tumor diameter, serum carcinoembryonic level, and maximum allelic fraction.

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrate that erlotinib is an effective neoadjuvant regimen in patients with EGFR-mutant locally advanced NSCLC, paving the way for its extended use in neoadjuvant settings.

[ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01217619]

Single-station skip-N2 disease: good prognosis in resected non-small-cell lung cancer (long-term results in skip-N2 disease)

OBJECTIVES

Pathological N2 (pN2) involvement has a negative impact on prognosis in patients operated on due to non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). pN2 disease may cause skip (pN0N2) or non-skip (pN1N2) metastases with pathological N1 (pN1) involvement. The effect of pN2 subgroups on prognosis is still controversial. We analysed the effect of pN1 disease and single-station pN2 disease subgroups on survival outcomes.

METHODS

The medical records of patients who underwent anatomical lung resection due to NSCLC at a single centre between January 2007 and January 2017 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed. Operative mortality, sublobar resection, Stage IV disease, incomplete resection and carcinoid tumour were considered exclusion criteria. After histopathological examination, the prognosis of patients with pN1, pN0N2 and pN1N2 was compared statistically. Univariable and multivariable analyses were made to define independent risk factors for overall survival rates.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time for 358 patients with 228 pN1 disease (63.7%), 59 pN0N2 disease (16.5%) and 71 pN1N2 disease (19.8%) was 40.4 ± 30.4 months. Median and 5-year overall survival rates for pN1, pN0N2 and pN1N2 diseases were 73.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 55.5-91.7] and 54.1%, 60.3 months (95% CI 26.8-93.8) and 51.2%, 20.8 months (95% CI 16.1-25.5) and 21.5%, respectively. The survival CIs of pN1 and pN0N2 diseases were similar, and the survival rates of these 2 groups were significantly better than those with pN1N2 (P < 0.001, P = 0.001, respectively). In multivariable analysis, patients over the age of 60 [hazard ratio (HR) 2.13, P < 0.001], patients not receiving adjuvant therapy (HR 1.52, P = 0.01) and patients with pN1N2 disease (HR 2.91, P < 0.001) had a poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced age, not receiving adjuvant therapy and having pN1N2 disease are negative prognostic factors in patients with nodal involvement who underwent curative resection due to NSCLC. The overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates of pN1 disease and single-station pN0N2 disease are similar, and they have significantly better survival rates than pN1N2 disease. Based on these results, surgical treatment may be considered an appropriate choice in patients with histopathologically diagnosed single-station skip-N2 disease.

Multimodality Therapy for N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Evolving Paradigm

BACKGROUND

Induction chemoradiation for resectable N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is used with the intent to optimize locoregional control, whereas induction chemotherapy given in systemic doses is meant to optimally target potential distant disease. However, the optimal preoperative treatment regimen is still unknown and practice patterns continue to vary widely. We compared multiinstitutional oncologic outcomes for N2 NSCLC from 4 experienced lung cancer treatment centers.

METHODS

This collaborative retrospective study unites 4 major thoracic oncology centers. Patients with N2 NSCLC undergoing surgical resection after induction chemotherapy (CxT) or concurrent chemoradiation (CxRT) were included. Primary outcomes were overall and disease-free survival (OS and DFS).

RESULTS

822 patients were identified (CxT = 662 and CxRT = 160). There were no differences in 5-year OS (CxT 39.9% versus CxRT 42.9%, p = 0.250) nor in DFS (CxT 28.7% versus 29.8%, p = 0.207). Recurrence rates (CxT 46.8% versus CxRT 51.6%, p = 0.282) and recurrence patterns were not significantly different (Local: CxT 9.8% versus CxRT 9.7%; and Distant: CxT 30.4% versus CxRT 33.1%, p = 0.764). There was no difference in perioperative mortality. In the analyses of patients who underwent pretreatment invasive mediastinal staging (n = 555), there were still no significant differences in OS (p = 0.341) and DFS (p = 0.455) between the 2 treatment strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Both treatment strategies produce equivalent and better than expected outcomes compared with historical controls for N2 NSCLC, with no differences in recurrence patterns. How these conventional therapeutic strategies will compare with those involving immunotherapy combined with surgical locoregional disease control for N2 disease remains to be determined.

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for Stage III non-small cell lung cancer

The treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) should control both local and microscopic systemic disease, because the 5-year survival of patients with Stage III NSCLC who underwent surgical resection alone has been dismal. One way to improve surgical outcome is the administration of chemotherapy before or after the surgical procedure. During the last two decades, many clinical studies have focused on developing optimal adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens that can be combined with surgical treatment and/or radiotherapy. Based on the results of those clinical studies, multimodality therapy is considered to be an appropriate treatment approach for Stage IIIA NSCLC patients; although, optimal treatment strategies are still evolving. When N2 nodal involvement is discovered postoperatively, adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy confers an overall survival benefit. The addition of postoperative radiotherapy might be considered for patients with nodal metastases. Although definitive chemoradiation remains a standard of care for cN2 NSCLC, alternative approaches such as induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy and surgery can be considered for a selective group of patients. When surgical resection can be performed after induction therapy with low risk and a good chance of complete resection, the outcome may be optimal. The decision to proceed with resection after induction therapy must include a detailed preoperative pulmonary function evaluation as well as a critical intraoperative assessment of the feasibility of complete resection.

Before or After: Evolving Neoadjuvant Approaches to Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The treatment of patients with stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most challenging and controversial areas of thoracic oncology. This heterogeneous group is characterized by varying tumor size and location, the potential for involvement of surrounding structures, and ipsilateral mediastinal lymph node spread. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, administered prior to definitive local therapy, has been found to improve survival in patients with stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC. Concurrent chemoradiation has also been evaluated in phase III studies in efforts to improve control of locoregional disease. In certain instances, a tri-modality approach involving concurrent chemoradiation followed by surgery, may offer patients the best chance for cure. In this article, we provide an overview of the trials evaluating neoadjuvant therapy in patients with stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC that have resulted in current practice strategies, and we highlight the areas of uncertainty in the management of this challenging disease. We also review the current ongoing research and future directions in the management of stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC.

Risk factors for relapse of resectable pathologic N2 non small lung cancer and prediction model for time-to-progression

Background

Pathologic N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was demonstrated with poor survival among literature. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed patients with pathologic N2 NSCLC and received anatomic resection (i.e. lobectomy) for further relapse risk factor analysis. The aim of this study is to identify the clinicopathologic factors related to relapse among resectable N2 NSCLC patients and to help clinicians in developing individualized follow up program and treatment plan.

Method

From January 2005 to July 2012, 90 diagnosed pathologic N2 NSCLC patients were enrolled into this study. We retrospectively reviewed medical records, image studies, and pathology reports to collect the patient clinico-pathologic factors.

Result

We identified that patients with visceral pleural invasion (p = 0.001) and skip metastases along mediastinal lymph node (p = 0.01) had a significant relationship to distant and disseminated metastases. Patients who had 2 or more risk factors for relapse demonstrated poor disease free survival than those who had less than 2 risk factors (p = 0.02). The number of involved metastatic area were significantly influential to the period of time-to-progression. The duration of time-to-progression was correlated with square of number of involved metastatic areas. (Pearson correlation coefficient = −0.29; p = 0.036).

Conclusion

Relapse risk factors of resectable pathologic N2 NSCLC patient after anatomic resection were visceral pleural invasion, skip mediastinal lymph node involvement, and the receipt of neoadjuvant therapy. The duration of time-to-progression was correlated with square of number of involved metastatic areas.

Cisplatin plus vinorelbine as induction treatment in stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer

Survival rates in patients with stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain low despite curative treatment. This is due to tumor recurrence at distant sites. The aim of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NA-CT) is to eradicate occult micrometastatic disease and improve survival in patients that are not candidates for surgery following induction therapy. A total of 21 patients with ipsilateral mediastinal node involvement (N2) with potentially resectable disease, who had been diagnosed with stage IIIA (T1-3 N1-2 and T4N0) NSCLC and who had received cisplatin and vinorelbine as induction treatment were included in this retrospective study. Patients who responded to the treatment underwent surgery, and those who were unresponsive received radical radiotherapy. Follow-up was conducted between March 2008 and April 2014. The median age of patients was 61 years, and all patients exhibited a good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The majority of patients were histologically diagnosed with adenocarcinoma (48%) or squamous cell carcinoma (38%), which was a poor prognostic factor for overall survival (OS). A total of 7 patients underwent surgery (of which 6 were down-staged), with a 3-year survival rate of 42.8%. The most significant factor associated with response to induction treatment was multistation nodal involvement. The complete resection rate for surgical patients was 85.7%. Unresectable patients had a 3-year survival rate of 25.8%. OS time for the whole cohort was 28.5 months, and the 3- and 5-year OS rates were 28.5% and 4.7%, respectively. CT-induced toxicity did not affect any treatment regime or surgical procedures. In conclusion, the use of cisplatin plus vinorelbine is feasible in a neoadjuvant setting, with good response rates and acceptable toxicity. Multistation N2 involvement is the main prognostic factor for a poor response to induction treatment.

Salvage Surgery After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Following definitive chemoradiation therapy, 24%-35% of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer have recurrence. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of salvage surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy and perioperative morbidity and mortality rates to determine long-term survival. From June 2003 to June 2013, 35 patients were eligible for lung cancer resection owing to relapse after definitive chemoradiation therapy. All patients received cisplatin-based chemotherapy and definitive radiotherapy (mean Gy: 58) with curative intent and all underwent total body computed tomography scan and 18-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan after the end of medical treatment and before surgery. Cyto-histologic confirmation was attempted in 20 (57%) patients. Six patients had exploratory thoracotomies. Twenty-nine patients underwent lung cancer resection: 11 lobectomies, 1 bilobectomy, and 17 pneumonectomies (7 right, 10 left). Complete resection was obtained in 27 of 35 (77%) patients. Thirteen (45%) patients underwent extended resection: intrapericardial pneumonectomy in 5 patients, vascular or bronchial sleeve resection in 2, atrial resection in 1, tracheal sleeve in 1, superior vena cava resection and reconstruction in 2 (1 with tracheal-sleeve resection), and chest wall resection in 2. Median time from chemoradiation therapy to resection was 7 months (range: 1-39). Viable tumor was found in 26 of 29 (89.6%) patients. Major complications occurred in 9 patients (25.7%). There were 2 (5.7%) perioperative deaths within 30 days. With a median follow-up of 13 months, postoperative 2- and 3-year survival rates after complete resection were 46% and 37%, respectively. Salvage lung resection after definitive chemoradiation therapy is feasible, with acceptable postoperative survival and complication rates.

Optimum treatment for mediastinal lymph node positive (N2) resectable non-small cell lung cancer: what is the role for surgery?

INTRODUCTION

A third of patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) present with Stage III disease with mediastinal (N2) nodal involvement representing an extremely heterogeneous population with a generally poor prognosis. Areas covered: This article describes the complexity of Stage III-N2 patients reviewing the outcomes of key clinical trials while highlighting the trial designs and subtleties that have created controversy in management. Both bimodality approaches combining chemotherapy with either surgery or radiation and trimodality approaches combining chemotherapy with both local therapies are reviewed. Finally, prognostic factors and future directions are explored for the management of this population. Expert commentary: Upfront surgery is not recommended for patients with Stage III-N2 NSCLC. Neoadjuvant approaches with both chemotherapy and chemoradiation are acceptable in a multidisciplinary setting if appropriate surgery is performed by a dedicated thoracic surgeon. Non-operative candidates should receive definitive concurrent chemoradiation. Innovative approaches are necessary to improve outcomes in this population.

The ratio of cancer cells to stroma after induction therapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Induction therapy induces degenerative changes of various degrees in both cancerous and non-cancerous cells of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The effect of induction therapy on histological characteristics, in particular the ratio of residual cancer cells to non-cancerous components, is unknown.

METHODS

Seventy-four NSCLC patients treated with induction therapy followed by surgery were enrolled. Residual cancer cells were identified using anti-pan-cytokeratin antibody (AE1/AE3). We analyzed and quantified the following three factors via digital image analysis; (1) the tumor area containing cancer cells and non-cancerous components (TA), (2) the total area of AE1/AE3 positive cancer cells (TACC), (3) the percentage of TACC to TA (%TACC). These factors were also analyzed in a matched control group (surgery alone, n = 80).

RESULTS

The median TACC of the induction therapy group was significantly lower than that of the control group (p < 0.01). In addition, the median %TACC of the induction therapy group (5.9 %) was significantly lower than that of the control group (58.6 %) (p < 0.01). TACC had a strong positive correlation with TA in the control group (r = 0.93), but not in the induction therapy group. Conversely, TACC had a strong positive correlation with %TACC in the induction therapy group (r = 0.95), but not in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Unlike the control group, the smaller the total area of residual cancer cells, the higher residual tumor contained non-cancerous components in the induction group, which may be the characteristic histological feature of NSCLC after induction therapy.

Surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer patients with unexpected persistent pathological N2 disease

Patients with mediastinal lymph node (LN) downstaging following neoadjuvant chemotherapy exhibit improved outcomes compared with patients with persistent N2 disease. The aim of this study was to compare clinicopathological characteristics and survival between patients with unexpected and expected persistent N2 disease following surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This retrospective analysis included 348 patients with NSCLC who underwent surgery following chemotherapy at the Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, between 1995 and 2012. According to the results of the imaging examinations and postoperative pathology, the patients were divided into three groups, namely groups I (nodal downstaging, pN0-1), II (expected persistent N2 disease) and III (unexpected persistent N2 disease). The rates of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the independent risk factors for OS and DFS. The mortality rate was 1.1% during the postoperative period. Perioperative complications occurred in 45 patients (12.9%). The 5-year OS rate was 32.2, 6.3 and 25.9% in groups I, II and III, respectively (group I vs. III, P=0.023; and group III vs. II, P<0.001). The 5-year DFS rate was 30.1, 5.1 and 22.4% in groups I, II and III, respectively (group I vs. III, P=0.012; and group III vs. II, P<0.001). Grouping, predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 sec, N downstaging and skip N2 metastasis were identified as independent predictive factors associated with OS, whereas the independent risk factors associated with DFS were grouping and N downstaging. Patients with unexpected persistent N2 disease exhibited better survival compared with those with expected persistent N2 disease. Surgery following chemotherapy remains the optimal approach for a proportion of patients with persistent N2 disease.

[Survival Analysis of 121 Stage N2-IIIa Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Surgery]

背景与目的

N2-Ⅲa期非小细胞肺癌（non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC）手术抑或非手术仍存颇多争议。我们通过回顾性分析121例手术的N2-Ⅲa期NSCLC患者的生存，探讨N2-Ⅲa期NSCLC患者术后远期生存的因素。

方法

选取北京大学肿瘤医院单医生组肺癌前瞻性数据库2000年1月-2013年6月共1, 290例NSCLC手术患者，其中N2-Ⅲa期NSCLC患者121例。分析性别、年龄、吸烟、围手术期化疗、切口、病理、脉管癌栓、pT分期、肿瘤大小对N2-Ⅲa期患者生存的影响；比较单站N2与多站N2的生存差异；比较术中或术后病理N2者（Ⅲa1/a2）与治疗前N2者（Ⅲa3/a4）的生存差异。单因素分析采用Kaplan-Meier法计算生存，Log-rank检验。多因素分析采用Cox回归分析。

结果

全组121例患者5年生存率为43.6%，中位生存时间50.3个月。单因素分析显示单站N2转移与多站N2转移的5年生存率分别为58.3%和25.5%（P=0.001）；Ⅲa1/a2期者与Ⅲa3/a4期者5年生存率分别为52.7%和38.4%（P=0.020）。多因素分析显示仅单站N2转移（HR=0.326, 95%CI: 0.186-0.572, P < 0.001）与Ⅲa1/a2（HR=0.494, 95%CI: 0.259-0.941, P=0.032）是影响本组N2-Ⅲa期患者远期生存的独立因素。

结论

N2-Ⅲa期NSCLC中单站N2转移者预后好于多站N2转移者。Ⅲa1/a2期患者预后好于Ⅲa3/a4期患者。高选择性N2-Ⅲa期NSCLC患者采取以外科手术为主的多学科综合治疗可获得较满意的远期生存。

Predictive value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography - computed tomography compared to postoperative pathological findings for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

This study was conducted to investigate the predictive value of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), compared to that of postoperative pathological findings, for T and N staging and the associations of the metabolic parameters of the primary tumor with histological type and differentiation. The preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT and postoperative pathological findings of 112 NSCLC patients treated with lobectomy or pneumonectomy combined with systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Compared to the postoperative pathological findings, the effect of contrast-enhanced CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT on T and N staging were evaluated. The metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumor were measured. The associations between these metabolic parameters and histological type and differentiation were also evaluated. The differences in the accuracy in overall staging and T staging between PET-CT and contrast-enhanced CT were significant (91.1 vs. 69.6%, P=0.000; and 92.9 vs. 76.8%, P=0.000, respectively). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of regional lymph node metastasis detection were 91.7, 93.0, 86.5, 95.8 and 92.6%, respectively, with PET-CT; and 71.3, 77.2, 60.6, 84.5 and 75.2%, respectively, with contrast-enhanced CT. The SUVmax (7.29±1.83 vs. 5.91±1.65, t=4.15, P=0.000) and MTV (48.20±22.47 vs. 30.21±19.72 cm³, t=4.48, P=0.000) were significantly higher for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) compared to those for adenocarcinoma (AC). There was a positive correlation between the MTV and SUVmax of the primary tumor (Pearson's r=0.838, P=0.000). Significant differences were observed among differentiation subgroups in the SUVmax and MTV of the primary tumor for both SCC and AC. In conclusion, compared to the postoperative pathological findings, the predictive value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT for T and N staging in NSCLC was higher compared to that of contrast-enhanced CT. The FDG uptake of the primary tumor was associated with histological type and differentiation and the difference was statistically significant. Therefore, the SUVmax and MTV of the primary tumor may be valuable indices to partly predict the histological type and grade of differentiation of NSCLC.

Multimodality treatment with surgery for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with n2 disease: a review article

Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is composed of a heterogeneous population of lesions (ie, T4N0-3, T3N1-3, and T1a-2aN2-3), which makes it difficult to establish a definitive treatment strategy. Although several retrospective and prospective studies have been conducted to investigate the significance of multimodality treatments with surgery for patients with resectable stage III NSCLC, the role of surgery still remains controversial. In this article, we review the results of retrospective and prospective studies that have investigated the significance of multimodality treatment with surgery for patients with stage III NSCLC, particularly those with mediastinal lymph node metastasis, and the implications for the treatment of this controversial subset of patients.

Surgical management of lung cancer

Surgery serves an important role in the diagnosis, staging, and definitive management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Resection is the primary mode of treatment for stage I and II NSCLC and an important component of the multimodality approach to stage IIIA disease. Standard resections include removal of the lobe involved with tumor and systematic evaluation of ipsilateral hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes. For early stage disease the evolving surgical treatment goals are aimed at decreasing morbidity and mortality through less invasive approaches including video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and robotic approaches, and potentially decreasing the volume of lung removed for select patients with well-staged small peripheral tumors. For patients with locally advanced disease, ongoing research is focused on appropriately identifying patients who will most benefit from the addition of surgery to a multimodality regime and safely integrating resection with chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Elevated serum C-reactive protein, carcinoembryonic antigen and N2 disease are poor prognostic indicators in non-small cell lung cancer

AIM

To assess the prognostic value of mediastinal lymph node metastases (N2 disease), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels and C-reactive protein (CRP) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), according to the 7th edition of the TNM classification.

METHODS

Newly diagnosed stage III-IV NSCLC were enrolled, including 75 patients with malignant pleural effusion. The relationship between serum CRP levels and other relevant variables such as sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, smoking status, initial staging, N2 disease, serum albumin, white blood cell count, platelet count, CEA, comorbidity and pathology were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to find prognostic markers using Cox's proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Of the 127 patients enrolled, 55 (43%) had elevated CRP levels. There was a significant correlation between serum CRP level and platelet count (P = 0.011). Median overall survival (OS) in the normal CRP group was significantly longer than in the high CRP group (15.7 months vs 9.1 months, P = 0.013). Hypoalbuminemia (P = 0.047), higher CEA (P = 0.043) and N2 disease (P = 0.040) were additional prognostic factors on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis an elevated CRP serum level (HR = 1.796; P = 0.005), higher CEA (HR = 1.563; P = 0.031) and N2 disease (HR = 1.723; P = 0.012) were independent prognostic factors for poor survival.

CONCLUSION

High levels of serum CRP and CEA, and N2 disease are independent prognostic indicators for the survival of patients with stage III-IV NSCLC.

Surgeon's view: is palliative resection of lung cancer ever justified?

Thoracic surgeons are often asked to see patients with locally advanced primary lung cancer in whom the goal of treatment is palliation for relief of disabling symptoms. The last four decades have brought great changes in the care of patients with primary lung cancer. The goals of the treatment must be well-defined by the interdisciplinary team. The thoracic surgeon has to make the final decision on whether to consider an operation for palliation and what is the expectation of the recommended treatment.

Sampling versus systematic full lymphatic dissection in surgical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

The extent of mediastinal lymph node assessment during surgery for non-small cell cancer remains controversial. Different techniques are used, ranging from simple visual inspection of the unopened mediastinum to an extended bilateral lymph node dissection. Furthermore, different terms are used to define these techniques. Sampling is the removal of one or more lymph nodes under the guidance of pre-operative findings. Systematic (full) nodal dissection is the removal of all mediastinal tissue containing the lymph nodes systematically within anatomical landmarks. A Medline search was conducted to identify articles in the English language that addressed the role of mediastinal lymph node resection in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Opinions as to the reasons for favoring full lymphatic dissection include complete resection, improved nodal staging and better local control due to resection of undetected micrometastasis. Arguments against routine full lymphatic dissection are increased morbidity, increase in operative time, and lack of evidence of improved survival. For complete resection of non-small cell lung cancer, many authors recommend a systematic nodal dissection as the standard approach during surgery, and suggest that this provides both adequate nodal staging and guarantees complete resection. Whether extending the lymph node dissection influences survival or recurrence rate is still not known. There are valid arguments in favor in terms not only of an improved local control but also of an improved long-term survival. However, the impact of lymph node dissection on long-term survival should be further assessed by large-scale multicenter randomized trials.

Role of induction therapy: surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer after induction therapy

Patients with Stage III non-small cell lung cancer are best managed by multimodality therapy. Patients with N2 disease can be treated with induction therapy (usually chemotherapy) followed by surgical resection. Patients whose medical comorbidities preclude surgery should be treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. T3 or T4 tumors involving the superior sulcus or spine are best managed with induction chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection.

[Resected non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma stage pIIIA-N2. Which patients will benefit most from adjuvant therapy?]

BACKGROUND

Controversy persists as regards the indications and results of surgery in the treatment of patients with stage pIIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objective of this study was to analyze the overall survival of a multicentre series of these patients and the role of adjuvant treatment, looking for factors that may define subgroups of patients with an increased benefit from this treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 287 patients, with stage pIIIA-N2 NSCLC subjected to complete resection, taken from a multi-institutional database of 2.994 prospectively collected consecutive patients who underwent surgery for lung cancer. Adjuvant treatment was administered in 238 cases (82.9%). Analyses were made of the age, gender, histological type, administration of induction and adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy treatments.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival was 24%, with a median survival of 22 months. Survival was 26.5% among patients receiving with adjuvant treatment, versus 10.7% for those without it (P=.069). Age modified the effect of adjuvant treatment on survival (interaction P=.049). In patients under 70 years of age with squamous cell carcinoma, adjuvant treatment reduced the mortality rate by 37% (hazard ratio: 0,63; 95% CI; 0,42-0,95; P=.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Completely resected patients with stage pIIIA-N2 NSCLC receiving adjuvant treatment reached higher survival rates than those who did not. Maximum benefit was achieved by the subgroup of patients under 70 years of age with squamous cell carcinoma.

Hope for progress after 40 years of futility? Novel approaches in the treatment of advanced stage III and IV non-small-cell-lung cancer: Stereotactic body radiation therapy, mediastinal lymphadenectomy, and novel systemic therapy

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a leading cause of cancer mortality. The majority of patients present with advanced (stage III-IV) disease. Such patients are treated with a variety of therapies including surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Despite decades of work, however, overall survival in this group has been resistant to any substantial improvement. This review briefly details the evolution to the current standard of care for advanced NSCLC, advances in systemic therapy, and novel techniques (stereotactic body radiation therapy [SBRT], and transcervical extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy [TEMLA] or video-assisted mediastinal lymphadenectomy [VAMLA]) that have been used in localized NSCLC. The utility of these techniques in advanced stage therapy and potential methods of combining these novel techniques with systemic therapy to improve survival are discussed.

Survival of patients with or without symptoms undergoing potentially curative resections for primary lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Numerous historical screening programs to detect lung cancer have been undertaken. With technologic advances, complimentary diagnostic tests have been developed; however, only the National Lung Cancer Trial has demonstrated increased survival. Following the success of this study, screening programs are being trialled in several countries. Screening should, in theory, reduce lung cancer deaths by identifying asymptomatic patients with earlier tumors. This study asked whether lung cancer patients who are asymptomatic at presentation have a better survival than those who present with symptoms.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of a validated prospective thoracic surgery database from a tertiary center in the Northwest of England. Included were 1,546 consecutive patients (826 men, 720 women) who received operative intervention for non-small cell lung cancer. The main outcome measures included 5-year survival and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Cancer stage, age, and operation type were confirmed as being of prognostic importance, validating previous studies. Survival between asymptomatic or symptomatic patients did not differ significantly (p = 0.489), regardless of stage. The hazard ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) for variables associated with poorer outcome identified by Cox's regression analysis were male sex, 1.34 (1.15 to 1.56); advancing age, 1.03 (1.02 to 1.04); advancing stage, 3.30 (2.69 to 4.04); and pneumonectomy, 1.24 (1.01 to 1.52). Symptoms were not a significant variable affecting survival on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study from the Northwest of England showed that in our subset of lung cancer patients undergoing resection, asymptomatic patients with non-small cell lung cancer do not have improved survival, implying it is a systemic disease in many at diagnosis. Care should be taken when generalizing the results of the National Lung Screening Trial to all populations until further validation has been performed.

Size of Stage IIIA Primary Lung Cancers and Survival: A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Database Analysis

Size of early-stage lung cancer is important in the prognosis of patients. We examined the large population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database to determine if tumor size was an independent risk factor of survival in patients undergoing lobectomy for N2 positive Stage IIIA nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study identified 1971 patients diagnosed with N2 positive Stage IIIA NSCLC, from 1998 to 2007, and who underwent lobectomy. Five tumor groups based on the seventh edition TNM lung cancer staging system (pathologic T1a 2 cm or less; T1b greater than 2 cm and 3 cm or less; T2a greater than 3 cm and 5 cm or less; T2b greater than 5 cm and 7 cm or less; T3 greater than 7 cm) were analyzed. Survival was reduced in patients with T3, T2a, and T2b tumors compared with patients with T1a and T1b ( P < 0.001). Survival estimates correlated with tumor size with poorer survival in T3 followed by T2b, T2a, and then T1b and T1a. Cohorts with T1a (hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; P = 0.01) and T1b (HR, 0.54; P = 0.01) were both found to have decreased hazard of death. Negative predictors of survival, in addition to increasing tumor size, included age and male gender, whereas positive predictors included tumor Grade I and upper lobe location. Increasing size of tumor is an independent negative risk factor for survival in patients undergoing lobectomy for N2 positive Stage IIIA NSCLC.

Role of surgery following induction therapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Over the last 30 years neoadjuvant treatment of stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) followed by surgical resection for stage IIIB disease has significantly improved the overall results of treatment for patients with stage III NSCLC as well as for those with locally invasive tumors. Different chemotherapy regimens have been used, although in most studies some combination of drugs that include cisplatin is the standard. Radiation when given as part of the induction protocol appears to offer a higher rate of resection and complete resection, and higher doses of radiation are associated with better nodal downstaging. Resection in patients with persistent N2 disease and pneumonectomy following induction therapy remain controversial. Resection in patients with persistent N2 disease and pneumonectomy following induction therapy remain controversial.

Long-term survival after complete mediastinal lymph node resection and lobectomy in patients with bulky N2 non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

At Juntendo University Hospital, Japan, two patients with complete resection of bulky N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has survived over the long term. Therefore, we decided to retrospectively study patients who also had a complete resection of the tumor including the "bulky" superior mediastinal node for the purpose of reviewing covariates that might be related to the favorable outcome.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the relation between covariates and survival after complete lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node resection (from April 1997 to August 2007) in 15 patients with bulky N2 NSCLC, lymph nodes greater than 2 cm in short-axis diameter (bulky nodal disease) measured on preoperative chest computer tomography.

RESULTS

Of 15 patients, 5 with bulky N2 single station had survival after the resection. Univariate analysis revealed that the postoperative stage significantly affected overall survival (p = 0.0101). Single-station node involvement in bulky N2 disease was the covariate associated with overall survival (p = 0.0150) and disease free survival (p = 0.0052).

CONCLUSIONS

In the complete resection of bulky N2 NSCLC in patients with lymph nodes measuring more than 2 cm in short-axis diameter, single-station node involvement suggests a favorable outcome and long-term survival, compared to patients with multi-station involvement.

Postoperative radiotherapy for resected pathological stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study of 221 cases from a single institution

BACKGROUND

For patients with resected pathological stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is not well defined. In this single-institutional study, we re-evaluated the effect of PORT on overall survival (OS) as well as tumor control in this subgroup of patients.

METHODS

In 2003-2005, 221 consecutive patients with resected pathological stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC at our institution were retrospectively analyzed in an institutional review board-approved study. The effect of PORT on OS, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. The impact of PORT on locoregional control and distant metastasis was also analyzed. Results. Compared with the control, patients treated with PORT had a significantly longer OS time (χ2, 3.966; p = .046) and DFS interval (χ2, 6.891; p = .009), as well as a trend toward a longer CSS duration (χ2, 3.486; p = .062). Patients treated with PORT also had a significantly higher locoregional recurrence-free survival rate (χ2, 5.048; p = .025) as well as distant metastasis-free survival rate (χ2, 11.248; p = .001). Multivariate analyses showed that PORT was significantly associated with a longer OS duration (p = .000).

CONCLUSIONS

PORT can significantly improve the survival of patients with resected pathological stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC. A prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial is ongoing.

Weight gain in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients during treatment with split-course concurrent chemoradiotherapy is associated with superior survival

BACKGROUND

Preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is an accepted treatment for potentially resectable, locally advanced, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We reviewed a decade of single institution experience with preoperative split-course CRT followed by surgical resection to evaluate survival and identify factors that may be helpful in predicting outcome.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

All patients treated with preoperative split-course CRT and resection at Rush University Medical Center (RUMC) between January 1999 and December 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local-regional progression-free survival (LRPFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Patient and treatment related variables were assessed for correlation with outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 54 patients were analyzed, 76% Stage IIIA, 18% Stage IIIB, and 6% oligometastatic. The pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 31.5%, and the absence of nodal metastases (pN0) was 64.8%. Median OS and 3-year actuarial survival were 44.6 months and 50%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed initial stage (p < 0.01) and percent weight change during CRT (p < 0.01) significantly correlated with PFS/OS. On multivariate analysis initial stage (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.18-4.90; p = 0.02) and percent weight change (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67-0.93; p < 0.01) maintained significance with respect to OS. There were no cases of Grade 3+ esophagitis, and there was a single case of Grade 3 febrile neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

The strong correlation between weight change during CRT and OS/PFS suggests that this clinical parameter may be useful as a complementary source of predictive information in addition to accepted factors such as pathological response.

Gefitinib as first-line therapy for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients in southern Taiwan

Gefitinib, a selective epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is effective in treating patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after unsuccessful chemotherapy. However, survival outcomes and predictors for its effectiveness in chemotherapy-naive NSCLC patients are still not clear. The goal of this study was to investigate the response and survival rates and identify the predictive factors for patients with advanced or metastatic disease receiving gefitinib as first-line therapy. We retrospectively analyzed the response and survival rates of patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC who had received gefitinib as first-line therapy across six medical institutes in Southern Taiwan between May 2004 and April 2006. The relationship between the response and survival rates to the known predictive factors for gefitinib response and survival was also investigated. A total of 97 patients (65 females and 32 males) were enrolled in this study. Seventy-four patients (76%) had never smoked. Eighty-eight patients (91%) had adenocarcinoma or bronchioloalveolar cell carcinoma. The objective response rate was 56% and the disease control rate (partial response plus stable disease) was 76%. Only poor performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, 3-4) was statistically significantly associated with overall response in this study. The 1-year survival rate was 77%. We suggest that first-line gefitinib monotherapy is promising in some subgroups of Asian patients with NSCLC. Further randomized controlled studies are needed to validate the effectiveness of first-line gefitinib therapy.

Prognostic factors for resected non-small cell lung cancer with pN2 status: implications for use of postoperative radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

For non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with pN2 status, the use of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) remains controversial. Here, we investigated the association between different clinicopathological features and postoperative therapy and local control and survival in patients with resected pN2 NSCLC.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 83 patients with pN2 NSCLC who underwent resection at Vanderbilt University Medical Center between 1994 and 2004. The relationship between 10 prognostic factors-gender, age at diagnosis, histology, tumor size, number of nodal stations involved, positive node number, surgical margin, extracapsular extension (ECE), and use of postoperative chemotherapy and PORT-and 2-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) rates was evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards ratios, respectively.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis, PORT was significantly associated with greater LRFS, RFS, and OS rates, whereas chemotherapy was associated with a trend toward a higher OS rate. Negative surgical margins were predictive of a higher OS rate, and negative ECE was associated with higher LRFS and RFS rates. On multivariate analysis, only PORT and negative ECE were associated with a higher LRFS rate. On subgroup analysis, in negative ECE patients, PORT was significantly associated with a higher OS rate.

CONCLUSIONS

PORT is associated with a higher OS rate for patients with resected pN2 NSCLC with negative ECE but not with positive ECE. The absence of ECE may serve as a useful prognostic variable in the selection of pN2 NSCLC patients for PORT and warrants further investigation in randomized clinical trials.