Immunosuppression withdrawal in renal transplantation

Steroid avoidance in renal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The recent surge in the use of steroid-avoidance protocols for pediatric renal transplant recipients has been fueled by the numerous adverse side effects of steroids and development of alternatives for successful immunosuppression. Steroid-avoidance protocols were first attempted in the adult population, and with positive outcomes, pediatrics soon followed. As more pediatric patients are placed on steroid-avoidance protocols, we must begin answering several important questions such as patient and graft outcome, safety profiles of various steroid-avoidance induction protocols, viral complications and incidence of transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), metabolic benefits, and the affect of steroid minimization on growth.

RECENT FINDINGS

Initial results from steroid-avoidance protocols show these protocols are safe and effective with improved graft survival, metabolic profiles, and linear growth without an increase in viremia or PTLD.

SUMMARY

Although initial results are promising, there is still a lack of long-term data from large, prospective randomized trials, and there is not enough data to determine the optimal steroid-avoidance protocol for pediatric renal transplant recipients.

Immunosuppression and immune monitoring after renal transplantation

Monitoring of immunosuppression therapy in renal transplant recipients is essential for good patient and graft survival. Monitoring includes frequent laboratory assays of serum immunosuppression levels, patient visits to assess and treat side effects, and vigilance for medication interactions. We review the various immunosuppression medications commonly used in renal transplantation, including usual dosing and side effects. Monitoring assays are discussed, as well as the frequency of monitoring and patient visits. Finally, we discuss several common clinical scenarios that often require adjustment of immunosuppression medications or regimens.

Detection of regulatory cells as an assay for allograft tolerance in miniature swine

BACKGROUND

There is currently a great need for an in vitro assay to assess the presence of tolerance following allotransplantation to determine whether immunosuppressive medications can be discontinued. Our laboratory has recently developed an assay involving coculture inhibition of cell-mediated lympholysis that correlates with tolerance to allografts in swine leukocyte antigen (SLA) Class I-mismatched miniature swine. The potential for clinical application of this assay may depend on 2 important factors: (1) whether the assay can be used in the presence of immunosuppression; and (2) whether frozen-stored naive responder cells can be utilized.

METHODS

Long-term tolerant MGH miniature swine that had accepted SLA Class I-mismatched kidney transplants after a 12-day course of cyclosporine or tacrolimus were studied. Two long-term tolerant and 2 naive control animals were treated with a clinically relevant dose of cyclosporine for 2 weeks (trough level 100 to 400 ng/ml) to simulate the ongoing "chronic" immunosuppression used in human recipients of allografts. Cells from tolerant or naive, recipient-matched animals were stimulated for 6 days with donor or third-party SLA. These primed cells were then cocultured with naive unstimulated recipient major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-matched responders and irradiated stimulators. Responder cells were tested both fresh and frozen.

RESULTS

Suppression of cytotoxic responses of naive responder cells was observed in all coculture assays using cells from tolerant animals primed against donor antigen in vitro, but not in assays using similarly primed cells from naive animals. Responder cells from tolerant animals receiving immunosuppression had a suppressive activity similar to that from cells of the same animals not receiving immunosuppression. Similar suppression was also observed in coculture assays using either fresh or frozen naive responder cells.

CONCLUSIONS

This coculture assay appears to correlate with the presence of tolerance under conditions applicable to the clinical setting. The assay appears to identify peripheral regulatory mechanisms of tolerance in allogeneic transplant recipients, and therefore may provide an approach for determining an appropriate timepoint at which to test withdrawal of immunosuppressive medications.

Benefit-Risk Assessment of Ciclosporin Withdrawal in Renal Transplant Recipients

Ciclosporin is associated with significant toxicity, including nephrotoxicity, and with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Many attempts have been made to wean patients from ciclosporin. Before the availability of new immunosuppressive drugs, the acute rejection rate observed after ciclosporin withdrawal did not permit the widespread use of withdrawal regimens even though meta-analysis did not show that they adversely affected patient or graft survival. Nevertheless, maintenance therapy with azathioprine and corticosteroids has not become routine practice. The introduction of mycophenolate mofetil and subsequently sirolimus has increased the number of clinical studies of the effects of ciclosporin withdrawal. In stable patients, this withdrawal is associated with a small but significant increase in the incidence of acute rejection episodes. Declining renal function and other forms of ciclosporin-related toxicity have improved. However, this improvement was also observed when ciclosporin was only reduced (and not withdrawn), which did not increase the risk of acute rejection. More precise definition of the patients who could benefit from ciclosporin-withdrawal may help to optimise the immunosuppressive regimen in this setting. In patients with chronic allograft deterioration, ciclosporin withdrawal together with mycophenolate mofetil introduction has been shown to improve renal function significantly in many small studies, and a large prospective randomised study. For the time being, ciclosporin withdrawal is a good therapeutic option for patients with declining renal function and signs of chronic ciclosporin nephrotoxicity on renal biopsy. Finally, recent preliminary studies have reported the results of complete avoidance of calcineurin inhibitors after renal transplantation. These results are promising as regards the incidence of acute rejection, renal function and safety, but need confirmation in larger trials with a longer follow-up. Nevertheless, it has become clear that the concept of an immunosuppressive regimen with little or no nephrotoxicity after renal transplantation is more and more important and plays a crucial part in tailoring immunosuppression to the needs of specific patient populations.