Flow PRA to detect clinically relevant HLA antibodies

Sensitive solid-phase detection of donor-specific antibodies as an aid highly relevant to improving allograft outcomes

Transplant recipients who have had sensitizing events such as pregnancies, blood transfusions and previous transplants often develop antibodies directed against human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-molecules of the donor tissue. These pre-formed donor-specific antibodies (DSA) represent a high risk of organ failure as a consequence of antibody-mediated hyper-acute or acute allograft rejection. As a first assay to detect DSA, the complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity assay (CDC) was established more than 40 years ago. However, this assay is characterized by several drawbacks such as a low sensitivity and a high susceptibility to various artificial factors generally not leading to valid and reliable outcomes under several circumstances that are reviewed in this article. Furthermore, only those antibodies that exert complement-fixing activity are detected. As a consequence, novel procedures that act independently of the complement system and that do not represent functional assays were generated in the format of solid phase assays (SPAs) (bead- or ELISA-based). In this article, we review the pros and cons of these sensitive SPA in comparison with the detection of DSA through the use of the traditional methods such as CDC and flow cytometric analyses. Potential drawbacks of the alternative methodological approaches comprising high background reactivity, susceptibility to environmental factors and the possible influence of subjective operators' errors concerning the interpretation of the results are summarized and critically discussed for each method. We provide a forecast on the future role of SPAs reliably excluding highly deleterious DSA, thus leading to an improved graft survival.

Clinical research and social status investigation for donor and recipient of living-related kidney transplant

OBJECTIVE

Renal transplantation is the best options for treating end-stage renal disease. Better patient and allograft survival rates are provided by living donation, which has been safe, with minimal immediate and long-term risk for the donor. This study aims to investigate the life status and summarize the clinical experience in living-related kidney transplant (LRKT) before and after renal transplantation.

METHODS

A total of 310 cases of LRKT have been performed in our center since 1998. Tissue matching and risk factors assessment in donors and recipients were performed before donation. Small lumbar incision was used in all cases for unilateral nephrectomy. Donors and recipients were followed up regularly after renal transplantation.

RESULTS

All living donors were healthy, with normal renal function after unilateral nephrectomy. The 1- and 5-year patient/graft survival rates of LRKT were 98.3 %/97.6 % and 91.3 %/86.9 %, respectively. The cumulative incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) and acute rejection (AR) was 2.9 % (9 cases). Thirteen cases developed pulmonary infection (4.2 %) and eight cases were cured. The graft function in most cases returned to normal range soon after kidney transplant. Moreover, the creatinine and BUN levels of grafts donated by children or siblings of recipients were markedly lower than those donated by parents, at 1 month after transplant.

CONCLUSION

Adequate pretransplant assessment, better tissue matching, and reduced ischemia time may result in lower incidence of DGF, AR and higher patient/graft survival rates for LRKT. It is important to improve selection criteria and health assessment of donors. Long-term follow-up is essential to ensure a healthy life for donors and recipients after kidney transplant.

Donor-specific antibody against denatured HLA-A1: clinically nonsignificant?

Pre-transplant screening of a woman with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) showed no anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alloantibodies by anti-human globulin-complement-dependent cytotoxicity (AHG-CDC; class I) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (class II). Following a negative AHG-CDC crossmatch, an HLA*01:01+ deceased donor (DD) kidney was transplanted in September 2005. Subsequent screening of pre-transplant serum by LABScreen Single Antigen (SA) array showed strong reactivity versus A*01:01. Despite that reactivity, at 5 years post-transplant, the patient has a serum creatinine of 1.6 mg/dl and has never experienced humoral or cellular rejection. Retrospective flow-cytometric crossmatch of pre- and post-transplant sera versus DD cells was negative. Rescreening of multiple pre- and post-transplant sera revealed anti-A1 reactivity persisting from the first through the last samples tested. The patient's anti-A1 was almost two fold more reactive with denatured A*01:01 FlowPRA SA beads after denaturation with acid treatment (pH 2.7) than with untreated beads. Parallel results were observed with pH 2.7 treated versus untreated A1+ T cells in FXM. These data highlight the difficulty in interpreting screening results obtained using bead arrays, because of antibodies that appear to recognize denatured but not native class I HLA antigens. We suggest that such bead-positive, flow cytometric crossmatch negative antibodies are not associated with humoral rejection, may not necessarily be detrimental to a graft, and deserve further evaluation before becoming a barrier to transplantation.

Novel solid phase-based ELISA assays contribute to an improved detection of anti-HLA antibodies and to an increased reliability of pre- and post-transplant crossmatching

Antibodies directed against HLA antigens of a given organ donor represent the dominating reason for hyper-acute or acute allograft rejections. In order to select recipients without donor-specific antibodies, a standard crossmatch (CM) procedure, the complement-dependent cytotoxicity assay (CDC), was developed. This functional assay strongly depends on the availability of isolated vital lymphocytes of a given donor. However, the requirements of the donor’s material may often not be fulfilled, so that the detection of the antibodies directed against HLA molecules is either impaired or becomes completely impossible. To circumvent the disadvantages of the CDC procedure, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based and other solid phase-based ELISA-related techniques have been designed to reliably detect anti-HLA antibodies in recipients. Due to the obvious advantages of these novel technologies, when compared with the classical CDC assay, there is an urgent need to implement them as complementary methods or even as a substitution for the conventional CDC crossmatch that is currently being applied by all tissue typing laboratories.

HLA alloimmunization is associated with RBC antibodies in multiply transfused patients with sickle cell disease

BACKGROUND

Alloimmunization to minor red blood cell (RBC) antigens occurs commonly in sickle cell disease (SCD). Patients with alloimmunization demonstrate increased risk for new alloantibody formation with subsequent transfusion. Alloimmunization to human leukocyte antigens (HLA) can occur with RBC transfusion and may result in graft rejection during stem cell or organ transplantation. The prevalence and risk factors for HLA alloimmunization in multiply transfused pediatric SCD patients are unknown.

PROCEDURE

A cross-sectional study of HLA alloimmunization in SCD patients aged 3-21 years with a history of >or=3 RBC transfusions was performed to test the hypothesis that HLA alloimmunization is associated with RBC alloimmunization. Antibodies to class I and class II HLA were measured by Flow Panel Reactive Antibody (FlowPRA).

RESULTS

Seventy-three SCD patients (30 with RBC antibodies) were tested. HLA antibodies were detected in 25/73 (34%) patients; class I HLA antibodies occurred in 24/73 (33%) and class II HLA antibodies occurred in 3 (4%). Among patients with RBC antibodies, 16/30 (53%) had HLA antibodies, while 9/43 (21%) patients without RBC antibodies had HLA antibodies (OR 4.32 [1.6-12.1]). In a multivariate analysis, antibodies to RBC antigens were an independent predictor of HLA alloimmunization (P = 0.041). The association of RBC and HLA immunization was strongest among patients with no history of chronic transfusion therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis is the first description of HLA alloimmunization in pediatric SCD patients who receive primarily leukoreduced RBC transfusions and demonstrates that HLA alloimmunization tendency is associated with antibodies to RBC antigens.

Renal transplantation in patients with pre-transplant donor-specific antibodies and negative flow cytometry crossmatches

The clinical significance of pre-transplant donor-specific antibodies (DSA), despite negative cytotoxicity and flow cytometry crossmatches (FCXMs), is unknown. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 60 living donor renal transplant recipients, all with pre-transplant cytotoxicity and T-cell and B-cell FCXMs that were negative. Twenty recipients had pre-transplant DSA detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and/or microbead methods. Forty contemporaneous DSA-negative controls were selected. In the DSA-positive group, after a median follow-up of 8.2 months (25-75% range, 5.4-22.8 months), patient survival was 100% and allograft survival was 95.0%. Acute humoral rejection (AHR) developed in four patients (20.0%). Three of the AHR episodes occurred within the first month post-transplant. Median serum creatinine at last follow-up was 1.3 mg/dL (25-75% range, 1.0-1.6 mg/dL), versus 1.1 mg/dL (25-75% range, 0.9-1.4 mg/dL) in the DSA-negative controls (p = 0.29). Only one of the 40 controls developed AHR (2.5%). Pre-transplant DSA was associated with a significantly increased incidence of AHR (p = 0.02 by log-rank test). In conclusion, despite negative pre-transplant cytotoxicity and FCXMs, renal transplant recipients with pre-transplant DSA detected by solid-phase methods may have an increased incidence of AHR and require close monitoring post-transplant.

Understanding the Sensitized Patient

New technologies have resulted in the ability to identify the presence of IgG human leukocyte antigen (HLA) or non-HLA antibodies in the sera of potential solid organ transplant recipients. Knowledge of the presence of these antibodies, their antigen specificities, and strength (titer) is crucial to understanding a patient's state of immunologic sensitization and reactivity. Finally, these data, when correlated with sensitive crossmatch results, allow clinicians to make more knowledgeable clinical decisions when paring donors and recipients for transplant.

Luminex technology for anti-HLA antibody screening: Evaluation of performance and of impact on laboratory routine

The recent introduction of new technologies such as Luminex has provided alternative methods to the Complement Dependent Cytotoxicity (CDC) test for HLA specific antibody detection. In this study we compared the results obtained with CDC to those obtained using a Luminex method with the aim of evaluating the impact of this new technology on antibody screening policies in our transplant setting.A total of 1,421 sera, acquired from patients on the waiting list for a kidney transplant or following transplantation, were tested by both methodologies. CDC was performed using a whole lymphocyte population comprising a panel of 52 cells. The percentage panel reactive antibodies (PRA) and antibody specificity were evaluated using Lambda Scan Analysis software. For the Luminex method sera screening and identification of antibody specificity were carried out using the LABScreen Mixed and LABScreen PRA respectively. The overall concordance between the results obtained using the CDC and the Luminex methods was 85%. HLA antibody specificity was confirmed in 96% of the sera which tested positive using the Luminex system and serum positivity corresponded with a previous sensitisation event in these individuals. Using the Luminex method 18% of patients on the waiting list were considered and managed as sensitised as compared to 7% when testing with CDC alone. The Luminex method was able to detect a number of antibody specificities significantly more frequently than the CDC method and in addition the CDC method failed to detect some of the antibody specificities detected by the Luminex system. Based on this comparison study we have incorporated the Luminex methodology into our screening strategy.

Pretransplant Soluble CD30 Is a Better Predictor of Posttransplant Development of Donor-Specific Antibodies and Acute Vascular Rejection than Panel Reactive Antibodies

BACKGROUND

This study tests a hypothesis that pretransplant concentration of soluble CD30 (sCD30) is a better predictor of posttransplant development of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) and acute vascular rejection (AVR) than panel reactive HLA antibodies (PRA).

METHODS

Pretransplant sera from 115 patients were evaluated for their PRA and sCD30 concentrations. All patients received calcineurin-inhibitor based immunosuppressive therapy. Objective measurements for rejection were biopsy-proven AVR episodes within first 6 months of the transplant. Posttransplant sera of patients with or without AVR were tested for the presence of DSA.

RESULTS

AVR rate was 16% (18/115). Patients positive for PRA and sCD30 tests were at significantly higher risk for AVR compared to those patients negative for both tests (36% versus 5%, p = 0.01). Among negative PRA patients risk for AR was significantly elevated if they were also tested positive for sCD30 concentrations (21% versus 5%, p = 0.04). Of the 18 patients with AVR, 14 were positive for sCD30, and 13 of them (93%) developed DSA posttransplant (p = 0.001) Nineteen patients without AVR were tested for DSA and sCD30 concentrations. Only two of these 19 patients were positive for sCD30 and DSA. AVR was strongly associated with the patients tested positive for both the tests: DSA and sCD30 (p = 0.00007). Furthermore, patients with AVR are more likely to produce DSA than those without AVR (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

These data support our hypothesis that patients positive for sCD30 contents are at high risk the development of DSA and AVR posttransplant regardless of their pretransplant PRA.

A significant role for histocompatibility in human islet transplantation

BACKGROUND

In recent years, transplantation of islets and pancreas has become a viable option for patients debilitated with type I diabetes. The success of islet transplantation has been attributed to the ability to isolate high quality islets for transplantation and capacity to maintain the recipient's immunosuppressive levels within a specific target range following transplantation. The purpose of this study was to determine the role of pretransplant sensitization to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) in islet transplantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed seven patients that were transplanted with islets under the auspices of the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation and Islet Cell Resource Center/National Institutes of Health. Humoral sensitization towards donor antigens both prior to and following islet transplantation was detected by FLOW panel reactive antibodies (PRA) and donor-specific cellular sensitization was detected by performing enzyme-linked immunospot assay analysis for cytokines interferon-gamma and interleukin-2.

RESULTS

Our analysis demonstrates that humoral and cellular sensitization to histocompatibility antigens prior to and after islet transplantation are associated with the failure of transplanted islets

CONCLUSION

Patient selection based on sensitization to donor HLA may be one of the factors crucial for the success of islet transplant. Further, in some patients, rejection of islets can be associated with sensitization to mismatched donor histocompatibility antigens.

Soluble CD30 concentrations in ESRD patients with and without panel reactive HLA antibodies

BACKGROUND

In this retrospective study we compared accuracy of panel reactive antibodies (PRA) with serum soluble CD30 (sCD30) contents in predicting acute rejection crisis post-renal transplant.

METHODS

Pre-transplant sera from 115 patients were evaluated for their PRA and sCD30 concentrations. All patients received calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppressive therapy. Objective measurements for rejection were biopsy-proven acute rejection (AR) episodes within first six months of the transplant. Post-transplant sera of patients with AR were tested for the presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA).

RESULTS

Overall AR rate was 16% (18/115). Patients positive for PRA and sCD30 tests were at significantly higher risk for AVR compared with those patients negative for both the tests (36% vs. 5%, p=0.01). Among negative PRA patients risk for AR was significantly elevated if they were also tested positive for sCD30 concentrations (21% vs. 5%, p=0.04). Of the 18 patients with AR, 14 were positive for sCD30, and 13 of them (93%) developed DSA post-transplant (p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

These data showed that patients positive for sCD30 contents are at high risk for the development of DSA and AR post-transplant regardless of their pre-transplant PRA.

Detection of donor-specific antibodies using HLA-coated microspheres: another tool for kidney transplant risk stratification

BACKGROUND

Sensitive techniques are able to detect low levels of circulating antibodies. For many newer techniques, the clinical consequences of these antibodies are unknown. We hoped to determine the significance of antibodies detected through the use of Luminex microsphere-based assay.

METHODS

Patients who received kidney transplants between March 2003 and May 2004 with negative anti-human globulin-augmented complement-dependent cytotoxicity (AHG-CDC) crossmatches were retested for pre-transplant panel reactive antibodies (PRA) using Luminex microspheres and stored sera. Patients were considered to have circulating antibodies if either class I or class II Luminex PRA was >or=15%. These patients were then analysed for pre-transplant donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Clinical outcomes were compared in patients with and without DSAs.

RESULTS

Out of 136 patients who underwent transplantation, 55 had Luminex PRA >or=15%. Of these 55 patients, only 16 had a standard PRA >or=30% and 75% had a history of a sensitizing event. Twenty out of 55 patients were DSA+. Patients with DSA detected by Luminex had higher rates of primary non-function (PNF), delayed graft function, biopsy-proven acute rejection, and lower rates of graft survival at 6 months. A combined endpoint of immunological and clinical events was far more common in patients with DSA.

CONCLUSION

The detection of DSAs by Luminex microspheres was associated with significantly higher rates of graft dysfunction and immunological events. Conversely, the presence of antibodies but no DSA by Luminex was associated with excellent outcomes. In patients with negative AHG-CDC crossmatches, the occurrence of low-level DSA by Luminex could assist in identifying patients that require more aggressive immune monitoring or immunosuppressive strategies.

Clinical Relevance of Low Levels of Preformed Alloantibodies Detected by Flow Cytometry in the First Year Post–Kidney Transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of transplants performed with a false-negative cytotoxicity cross-match and to analyze the clinical relevance of alloantibodies (Ab) detected only by flow cytometry (flow).

METHODS

We studied 66 patients undergoing kidney transplantation from a cadaveric donor. All patients had a simultaneous negative T+AHG+DTT and B+DTT. Pretransplant sera were retrospectively analyzed by flow cytometry according to an Emory University protocol: (1) T+ and B-: Ab anti-class I; (2) T- and B+: anti-class II; (3) T+B+: anti-class I + II. Chi-square, Fisher exact, Student t test, and Kaplan Meier analyses were employed with significance assigned at P < or = .05.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of false-negative cytotoxicity was 33.3% (22/66), namely, 6.1% (n = 4) anti-class I; 9.1% (n = 6) anti-class II; and 18.2% (n = 12) anti-class I + II. Primary nonfunctioning grafts occurred in 6.8% (3/44) and 13.6% (3/22) negative and positive flow patients (two anti-class I + II and one class II; P = .39). The incidence of graft loss in the first year was respectively, 13.6% (6/44) and 18.2% (4/22; two anti-class II and two anti-class I + II; P = .72). Compared to flow-negative grafts, creatinine levels were significantly higher among flow-positive patients at 8 and 12 weeks. One-year graft survivals were 86.4% among negative versus 81.8% for the positive group (P = .67).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed that 33% of kidney transplant recipients had low levels of alloantibodies detected only by flow. This single factor was associated with the worst graft function in the first trimester with a suggestion of a higher risk for non-functioning graft.

Humoral theory of transplantation

According to the humoral theory of transplantation, antibodies cause allograft rejection. Publications are cited showing that antibodies: (1). cause hyperacute kidney rejection, (2). lead to C4d deposits associated with early kidney graft failures, (3). are a good indicator of presensitization leading to early acute rejections, (4). were present in 96% of 826 patients who rejected a kidney graft, (5). are associated with chronic rejection in 33 studies of kidney, heart, lung and liver grafts, and (6). in three studies, appeared in the circulation BEFORE evidence of bronchiolitis obliterans in lung transplants, and BEFORE kidney rejection. In addition, a prospective cooperative study of 1629 patients in 24 centers demonstrated that antibodies foretold subsequent failures after a follow-up period of 6 months (p = 0.05). The specificity of antibodies detected in the serum of rejecting patients were often not donor specific, presumably because they were absorbed by the rejecting organ. If the humoral theory is accepted, even provisionally, transplanted patients who have antibodies could be treated with immunosuppression until the antibodies disappear to determine whether chronic rejection can be blocked. If successful, in patients who do not have antibodies, immunosuppression could be reduced until antibodies appear.

Single human leukocyte antigen flow cytometry beads for accurate identification of human leukocyte antigen antibody specificities

BACKGROUND

It is difficult to assign antibody specificity for highly sensitized patients using a cell panel with multiple antigens per reaction. We describe here a single antigen bead panel for accurate identification of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody specificities by flow cytometry.

METHODS

A total of 110 single recombinant HLAs, including 34 A locus alleles, 57 B locus alleles, and 19 C locus alleles, were produced by a mammalian expression system. These single antigens were coated onto eight different colored microbeads, which were mixed together in one tube for simultaneous detection of HLA antibodies against eight different antigens per flow cytometry test.

RESULTS

Single HLA reacted specifically with the serologically defined monoclonal antibodies. The single antigen panel provided higher resolution than the regular cell panel for antibody detection by uncovering the masked specificities. Single antigens also provided higher sensitivity than the multiple antigens coated onto beads for HLA antibody detection as demonstrated by serum dilution studies. In 10 sera from patients who had rejected a kidney transplant, single antigen beads identified antibodies to 31 of 35 antigens that were mismatched in the donor. Most important, none of the reactions were against antigens present in the recipient.

CONCLUSION

An accurate and sensitive HLA antibody detection method is described using flow cytometry beads coated with single HLAs produced by recombinant technology. The single antigen beads should be useful in predicting negative crossmatch in highly sensitized organ recipients and highly sensitized patients requiring platelets.