Insulin secretion from cultured islets encapsulated in immuno- and virus-protective capillaries

Engineering superstable islets-laden chitosan microgels with carboxymethyl cellulose coating for long-term blood glucose regulation in vivo

Islet transplantation to restore endogenous insulin secretion is a promising therapy for type 1 diabetes in clinic. However, host immune rejection seriously limits the survival of transplanted islets. Despite of the various encapsulation strategies and materials developed so far to provide immune isolation for transplanted islets, long-term blood glucose regulation is still difficult due to the inherent defects of the encapsulation materials. Herein, a novel islet-encapsulation composite material with low immunogenicity, good biocompatibility and excellent stability is reported. Specifically, chitosan (CS) microgels (diameter: ∼302 μm) are prepared via Michael addition reaction between maleimide grafted chitosan (CS-Mal) and thiol grafted chitosan (CS-NAC) in droplet-based microfluidic device, and then zwitterionic surface layer is constructed on CS microgel surface by covalent binding between maleimide groups on CS and thiol groups on thiol modified carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC-SH). The as-formed carboxymethyl cellulose coated chitosan (CS@CMC) microgels show not only long-term stability in vivo owing to the non-biodegradability of CMC, but also fantastic anti-adsorption and antifibrosis because of the stable zwitterionic surface layer. As a result, islets encapsulated in the CS@CMC microgels exhibit high viability and good insulin secretion function in vivo, and long-term blood glucose regulation is achieved for 180 days in diabetic mice post-transplantation.

Polymers in cell encapsulation from an enveloped cell perspective

In the past two decades, many polymers have been proposed for producing immunoprotective capsules. Examples include the natural polymers alginate, agarose, chitosan, cellulose, collagen, and xanthan and synthetic polymers poly(ethylene glycol), polyvinyl alcohol, polyurethane, poly(ether-sulfone), polypropylene, sodium polystyrene sulfate, and polyacrylate poly(acrylonitrile-sodium methallylsulfonate). The biocompatibility of these polymers is discussed in terms of tissue responses in both the host and matrix to accommodate the functional survival of the cells. Cells should grow and function in the polymer network as adequately as in their natural environment. This is critical when therapeutic cells from scarce cadaveric donors are considered, such as pancreatic islets. Additionally, the cell mass in capsules is discussed from the perspective of emerging new insights into the release of so-called danger-associated molecular pattern molecules by clumps of necrotic therapeutic cells. We conclude that despite two decades of intensive research, drawing conclusions about which polymer is most adequate for clinical application is still difficult. This is because of the lack of documentation on critical information, such as the composition of the polymer, the presence or absence of confounding factors that induce immune responses, toxicity to enveloped cells, and the permeability of the polymer network. Only alginate has been studied extensively and currently qualifies for application. This review also discusses critical issues that are not directly related to polymers and are not discussed in the other reviews in this issue, such as the functional performance of encapsulated cells in vivo. Physiological endocrine responses may indeed not be expected because of the many barriers that the metabolites encounter when traveling from the blood stream to the enveloped cells and back to circulation. However, despite these diffusion barriers, many studies have shown optimal regulation, allowing us to conclude that encapsulated grafts do not always follow nature's course but are still a possible solution for many endocrine disorders for which the minute-to-minute regulation of metabolites is mandatory.