Mucosal vascular alterations in the early posttransplant period of small bowel allograft recipients may reflect humoral-based allograft rejection

Antibody-mediated rejection across solid organ transplants: manifestations, mechanisms, and therapies

Solid organ transplantation is a curative therapy for hundreds of thousands of patients with end-stage organ failure. However, long-term outcomes have not improved, and nearly half of transplant recipients will lose their allografts by 10 years after transplant. One of the major challenges facing clinical transplantation is antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) caused by anti-donor HLA antibodies. AMR is highly associated with graft loss, but unfortunately there are few efficacious therapies to prevent and reverse AMR. This Review describes the clinical and histological manifestations of AMR, and discusses the immunopathological mechanisms contributing to antibody-mediated allograft injury as well as current and emerging therapies.

Evaluation of C4d staining in liver and small intestine allografts

CONTEXT

Antibody-mediated humoral rejection in kidney and heart allografts is well recognized and is often associated with poor outcome. C4d deposition in allograft biopsy specimens occurs at sites of antibody-mediated complement activation and has become one of the histopathologic criteria for diagnosis of humoral rejection in the kidney and the heart.

OBJECTIVE

To study immunohistochemical C4d staining as a potential diagnostic marker in liver and small intestine allograft biopsy specimens.

DESIGN

Thirty-six small intestine and 71 liver specimens, including native specimens, allografts with and without histologic features of acute cellular rejection, and explants, were stained with antisera to C4d using an immunohistochemical method on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue.

RESULTS

In small intestine, C4d labeled capillaries in 27% of cases with no evidence of rejection, 36% of cases with evidence of acute rejection, and 2 (28%) of 7 specimens of native normal small intestine. In liver allograft biopsy specimens, C4d stained endothelium of veins, arteries, and/or sinusoids in 2 (8%) of 25 cases of acute rejection with central vein involvement; C4d staining was negative in biopsy specimens with no evidence of rejection. C4d stained the endothelium in a subset of explanted liver allografts with ductopenic rejection or chronic vascular rejection and strongly stained 1 explant with features of hyperacute rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical utility of C4d staining in solid organ transplantation may vary by organ. Our data show C4d is unlikely to have utility in small intestine allograft biopsy specimens; however, further study in liver allografts, in conjunction with donor-specific antibody testing, is warranted.

Laser-Doppler flowmetry in the monitoring of the human intestinal allograft: a preliminary report

During acute rejection, graft endothelium becomes a prime target for recipient immune cells. Animal studies have shown reduced microvascular perfusion, probably due to increased endothelial-leukocyte interaction and endothelial impairment, leading to graft damage. Using laser-Doppler flowmetry (LDF), we correlated the microvascular blood flow in the intestinal mucosa of five patients receiving multivisceral grafts with clinical events and pathology results. Measurements (n = 75) were performed during the first 4 weeks posttransplantation by inserting the LDF flexible probe through the ileostomy for 25 to 30 cm. Forty-six of the 75 measurements were performed within 24 hours of endoscopy and biopsy. In uncomplicated cases, we recorded a gradual increase in mucosal perfusion during the first week posttransplantation that presumably reflected regeneration after reperfusion injury. Increased mucosal perfusion did not seem to correlate with rejection or other adverse clinical events. Sudden and sustained decreases in mucosal perfusion by 30% or more compared to the previous measurements were associated with septic episodes, rejection, or both. LDF revealed a good sensitivity in monitoring the intestinal microcirculation. It was able to indicate perfusion changes associated with acute rejection. The relatively low specificity of LDF may be compensated by the low invasivity, allowing frequent investigation. LDF may be an additional tool for routine monitoring of intestinal allografts.

Monitoring of the Intestinal Mucosal Perfusion Using Laser Doppler Flowmetry After Multivisceral Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Graft endothelium constitutes a prime target during acute rejection. Infiltration of T cells, monocytes, and enhanced endothelial-leukocyte interactions result in microvascular impairment and altered perfusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We measured mucosal blood flow using a laser Doppler flowmeter in three patients undergoing multivisceral transplantation. Thirty-seven measurements were performed through the ileostomy over the first 4 weeks posttransplantation. Most measurements were performed within a 24-hour interval from endoscopy and biopsy.

RESULTS

Mucosal perfusion increased throughout the first postoperative week and eventually stabilized around levels specific for each patient. Mucosal perfusion remained stable during graft pancreatitis, but decreased 35% to 55% from baseline (the average value of the previous measurements) during acute rejection and sepsis. During the first week posttransplantation there was a gradual increase in mucosal perfusion, which might reflect regeneration after reperfusion injury. Increased mucosal perfusion did not seem to correlate with rejection or other adverse clinical events. A sudden decrease in mucosal perfusion of 30% or more compared to the previous measurements was associated with septic episodes and/or rejection.