Auxiliary liver and combined kidney transplantation prevents hyperacute kidney rejection in highly sensitized patients

Combined heart and liver transplant attenuates cardiac allograft vasculopathy compared with isolated heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

We evaluated whether combined heart and liver transplant (H+LTx) can protect the heart graft from the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy using coronary three-dimensional (3D) volumetric intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).

METHODS

From 2004 to 2009, we identified 24 isolated heart transplant (HTx) and 10 H+LTx recipients in whom two coronary 3D IVUS studies were performed 1 year apart. Baseline 3D IVUS was performed at 0.22 (0.17-1.16) years after transplantation, with follow-up 3D IVUS exams performed after baseline exam (0.96 [0.83-1.08]).

RESULTS

Rate of plaque volume and plaque index (plaque volume/vessel volume) progression was attenuated in the H+LTx group (0.3±1.1 vs. 1.5±2.9 mm/mm; P=0.08 and 0.01±0.03 vs. 0.1±0.1; P=0.004, respectively). Rejection burden was much lower in the H+LTx patients. Outcome analysis in 66 consecutive patients (56 HTx and 10 H+LTx) was performed irrespective of performance of second coronary IVUS. H+LTx was associated with reduced rate of cardiac events (P=0.04), which remained significant when adjusted for the difference in the primary etiology for heart disease (P=0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary serial 3D coronary IVUS data show that H+LTx attenuates cardiac allograft vasculopathy by decreasing the rate of plaque volume and plaque index progression and improves coronary-related outcomes. Because of the small numbers and the differences in etiology of heart disease, our data should be interpreted cautiously, and larger clinical trials would be required to recommend H+LTx for improved coronary remodeling.

Auxiliary liver transplantation in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Auxiliary liver transplantation (ALT) has developed as a technique for treating patients with acute liver failure. The surgical techniques of ALT have been refined and current patient survival appears to be similar to that observed with conventional liver replacement for acute liver failure.

RECENT FINDINGS

Our understanding of liver regeneration has improved with experience and it is possible to identify patient and disease groups that are more likely to regenerate and wean off immunosuppression after ALT. Withdrawal of immunosuppression is possible in at least two thirds of survivors up to 4 years post transplant. Young patients have most to gain in the long term from immunosuppression withdrawal. Documentation of liver regeneration should be performed by liver histology, nuclear medicine scanning and CT volumetry. Weaning should be gradual to allow for graft atrophy to avoid complications. ALT has also been utilised for the management of inborn errors of metabolism based in the liver and for other rare problems and these will be briefly addressed in the review.

SUMMARY

Auxiliary liver transplantation should be considered for the treatment of children with acute liver failure satisfying current criteria for liver transplantation.

Current indications for combined liver and kidney transplantation in adults

A significant number of patients awaiting liver transplantation have associated renal failure. Combined Liver and Kidney Transplantation (CLKT) is increasingly offered especially since the introduction of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD). Decision to perform CLKT is straightforward when both organs suffer end-stage failure. However, the indications for CLKT are not well defined and there is controversy concerning some. We reviewed available data on PUBMED, United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), Organ Procurement Transplantation Network (OPTN), European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) and discuss all current indications for CLKT.

CONCLUSION

Overall long-term outcome following CLKT is acceptable. There is an urgent need to further refine our ability to identify the cases with reversible renal injury in the setting of end-stage liver disease to avoid unnecessary CLKT. Liver protects the kidney from disease recurrence and allograft loss in metabolic diseases. However, the use of liver allograft for immunological protection of kidneys in highly sensitised patients with positive cross-match and previously failed renal transplants is still experimental.

Desensitization strategies enabling successful renal transplantation in highly sensitized patients

Currently, the number of highly sensitized patients awaiting a renal transplant is increasing on the waiting lists of different organ exchange organizations. Due to the presence of antibodies against a broad variety of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) specificities, highly sensitized patients have a markedly reduced chance of receiving a crossmatch-negative organ. It has long been recognized that hyperacute rejection is associated with the presence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies at the time of transplantation. Meanwhile treatment protocols have been developed to achieve successful transplantation across antibody barriers. Therefore, the presence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies and a positive serological crossmatch are no longer considered as an absolute contraindication to renal transplantation. Mainly, two desensitization protocols have been established in order to overcome a positive crossmatch or to enhance the chance of highly sensitized patients to receive a crossmatch-negative organ: high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or low-dose IVIg in combination with plasmapheresis. Herein, we summarize the characteristics of these two treatment regimes along with other alternative approaches that are currently used for the management of kidney graft recipients with broad alloantibody reactivity against potential kidney donors.

Transplantation across previously incompatible immunological barriers

This article reviews recent advances, which allow the transplantation across or around previously incompatible immunological barriers such as a positive crossmatch or ABO blood group incompatibility.

Extending options for highly sensitized patients to receive a suitable kidney graft

Highly sensitized patients (anti-HLA) on the kidney waiting list wait longer for a suitable crossmatch negative organ. At the moment there are two strategies to enhance transplantation of these patients. One approach is the determination of acceptable HLA mismatches and application of this knowledge for the selection of crossmatch negative donors, and the second is the desensitization of patients with intravenous immunoglobulin-based protocols to enable transplantation of an organ from a donor towards which antibodies were originally present. Both approaches have advantages and disadvantages and are only successful in a proportion of the patients. The optimal solution is an integrated strategy whereby desensitization is used for those patients for whom the acceptable mismatch approach is not successful.

Tolerogenic protocols for intestinal transplantation

The intestine has long been considered as a "forbidden" organ to transplant [Ann. Surg. 216 (1992) 223-33]. This is due to the particularly challenging nature of the immunological conflict that an intestinal graft may cause: a particularly vigorous rejection response, in addition to the capacity to mount a graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) [Transplantation 37 (1984) 429]. Currently, the short-term success of intestinal transplantation (Itx) depends upon the chronic delivery of profound immunosuppression but this causes infection, malignancies--in particular posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD)--and direct drug toxicity. For these reasons, the results of Itx remain inferior to those of other solid organ transplants in the middle and in the long term (Intestinal Transplant Registry: www.small-bowel-transplant.org). Improved results and wider application of Itx requires the development of protocols that would facilitate acceptance of the new intestine thereby allowing to reduce the need for immunosuppression with its attending complications. Relevant experimental data and the recent evolution in the clinical strategies used to promote acceptance of intestinal grafts are reviewed.