Effect of FK506 on magnesium homeostasis after renal transplantation

Diuretic Treatment in Heart Failure: A Practical Guide for Clinicians

Congestion and fluid retention are the hallmarks of decompensated heart failure and the major reason for the hospitalization of patients with heart failure. Diuretics have been used in heart failure for decades, and they remain the backbone of the contemporary management of heart failure. Loop diuretics is the preferred diuretic, and it has been given a class I recommendation by clinical guidelines for the relief of congestion symptoms. Although loop diuretics have been used virtually among all patients with acute decompensated heart failure, there is still very limited clinical evidence to guide the optimized diuretics use. This is a sharp contrast to the rapidly growing evidence of the rest of the guideline-directed medical therapy of heart failure and calls for further studies. The loop diuretics possess a unique pharmacology and pharmacokinetics that lay the ground for different strategies to increase diuretic efficiency. However, many of these approaches have not been evaluated in randomized clinical trials. In recent years, a stepped and protocolized diuretics dosing has been suggested to have superior benefits over an individual clinician-based strategy. Diuretic resistance has been a major challenge to decongestion therapy for patients with heart failure and is associated with a poor clinical prognosis. Recently, therapy options have emerged to help overcome diuretic resistance to loop diuretics and have been evaluated in randomized clinical trials. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of the pharmacology and clinical use of loop diuretics in the context of heart failure, with attention to its side effects, and adjuncts, as well as the challenges and future direction.

Allogeneic activation is attenuated in a model of mouse lung perfused with magnesium-deficient blood

Hypomagnesemia, which is frequently observed in patients treated with calcineurin inhibitors to prevent rejection after allogeneic transplantation, has been associated with a faster rate of decline in allograft function. The effect of hypomagnesemia on lung allograft has not been reported yet. In our model of isolated mouse lung, we have evaluated the early effects of allogeneic lung perfusion with blood from magnesium (Mg)-deficient mice for 3 h on lung activation and remodelling, compared to isogeneic perfusion. Hypomagnesemia (0.21+/-0.07 mmol Mg(2+)/l) was observed in blood from Mg-deficient mice, but no inflammatory pattern. The mRNA level of the intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, but neither of the vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1, nor of the cytokines tumor necrosis factor (TNF)alpha and interleukin (IL)-2, was enhanced (p<0.05). Although caspase-3 mRNA was transiently enhanced, no apoptotic cells were evidenced in lung tissues even after 3 h. Using cDNA array, we found that the genes encoding RANKL, RANK, TNFR2, NFATX, IL-1R2, IL-6R gp130, SOCS3, PDGFRB, P63, CSF3R, CXCL1, CXCL5, CX3CL1, CSF1, which are involved in inflammation and apoptosis regulation, were markedly up-regulated in allogeneic conditions. Our results support a limited allogeneic activation and an early stage of the inflammatory process in lung, at the time of inflammatory cell recruitment without lung tissue remodelling, as a result of hypomagnesemia. These findings suggest that cyclosporine-related hypomagnesemia, observed in most of the transplanted patients, does not constitute an additional risk for lung allograft outcome.

Drug-induced hypomagnesaemia : scope and management

Nearly 50 medications have been implicated as inducing hypomagnesaemia, sometimes based on insufficient data regarding clinical significance and frequency of occurrence. In fact, clinical effects attributed to hypomagnaesemia have been reported in only 17 of these drugs. A considerable amount of literature relating to individual drugs has been published, yet a comprehensive overview of this issue is not available and the hypomagnesaemic effect of a drug could be either overemphasised or under-rated. In addition, there are neither guidelines regarding treatment, prevention and monitoring of drug-induced hypomagnesaemia nor agreement as to what serum level of magnesium may actually be defined as 'hypomagnesaemia'. By compiling data from published papers, electronic databases, textbooks and product information leaflets, we attempted to assess the clinical significance of hypomagnesaemia induced by each drug. A practical approach for managing drug-induced hypomagnesaemia, incorporating both published literature and personal experience of the physician, is proposed. When drugs classified as inducing 'significant' hypomagnesaemia (cisplatin, amphotericin B, ciclosporin) are administered, routine magnesium monitoring is warranted, preventive treatment should be considered and treatment of hypomagnesaemia should be initiated with or without overt clinical manifestations. In drugs belonging to the 'potentially significant' category, among which are amikacin, gentamicin, laxatives, pentamidine, tobramycin, tacrolimus and carboplatin, magnesium monitoring is justified when either of the following occurs: clinical manifestations are apparent; persistent hypokalaemia, hypocalcaemia or alkalosis are present; other precipitating factors for hypomagnesaemia coexist; or treatment is with more than one potentially hypomagnesaemic drug. No preventive treatment is required and treatment should be initiated only if hypomagnesaemia is accompanied by symptoms or clinically significant relevant laboratory findings. In those drugs whose hypomagnesaemic effect is labelled as 'questionable', including furosemide and hydrochlorothiazide, routine monitoring and treatment are not required.

Effects of Immunosuppressive Agents on Magnesium Metabolism Early after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine A (CSA) and tacrolimus, cause hypomagnesemia by suppressing reabsorption of magnesium (Mg) from renal tubules. To assess whether the effect on Mg metabolism after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) differs among calcineurin inhibitors, we prospectively evaluated the Mg metabolism in recipients of allogeneic HSCT who received CSA or tacrolimus

METHODS

Patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT were enrolled. CSA and tacrolimus were given by continuous infusion starting from day -1. Serum Mg and the total amount of urinary Mg excretion were measured once before starting of CSA or tacrolimus, and once weekly after HSCT for 4 weeks. Mg was supplemented with magnesium l-aspartate by continuous infusion to maintain the serum Mg level >1.4 mEq/L.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were evaluated (12 in the CSA group, 24 in the tacrolimus group). The serum Mg level began to decrease in both groups at the first week after HSCT, and the mean serum Mg levels were significantly lower in the tacrolimus group than in the CSA group from the first to the third week. The total amount of urinary Mg excretion and Mg supplementation began to increase in both groups at the second week after HSCT, and the amounts in the tacrolimus group were significantly higher than those in the CSA group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although both calcineurin inhibitors increased urinary Mg excretion and caused hypomagnesemia shortly after HSCT, the effect was more significant with tacrolimus than with CSA. This observation may explain the higher incidence of renal impairment and encephalopathy in patients receiving tacrolimus.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation

The aim of this review is to analyse critically the recent literature on the clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in solid organ transplant recipients. Dosage and target concentration recommendations for tacrolimus vary from centre to centre, and large pharmacokinetic variability makes it difficult to predict what concentration will be achieved with a particular dose or dosage change. Therapeutic ranges have not been based on statistical approaches. The majority of pharmacokinetic studies have involved intense blood sampling in small homogeneous groups in the immediate post-transplant period. Most have used nonspecific immunoassays and provide little information on pharmacokinetic variability. Demographic investigations seeking correlations between pharmacokinetic parameters and patient factors have generally looked at one covariate at a time and have involved small patient numbers. Factors reported to influence the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus include the patient group studied, hepatic dysfunction, hepatitis C status, time after transplantation, patient age, donor liver characteristics, recipient race, haematocrit and albumin concentrations, diurnal rhythm, food administration, corticosteroid dosage, diarrhoea and cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzyme and P-glycoprotein expression. Population analyses are adding to our understanding of the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus, but such investigations are still in their infancy. A significant proportion of model variability remains unexplained. Population modelling and Bayesian forecasting may be improved if CYP isoenzymes and/or P-glycoprotein expression could be considered as covariates. Reports have been conflicting as to whether low tacrolimus trough concentrations are related to rejection. Several studies have demonstrated a correlation between high trough concentrations and toxicity, particularly nephrotoxicity. The best predictor of pharmacological effect may be drug concentrations in the transplanted organ itself. Researchers have started to question current reliance on trough measurement during therapeutic drug monitoring, with instances of toxicity and rejection occurring when trough concentrations are within 'acceptable' ranges. The correlation between blood concentration and drug exposure can be improved by use of non-trough timepoints. However, controversy exists as to whether this will provide any great benefit, given the added complexity in monitoring. Investigators are now attempting to quantify the pharmacological effects of tacrolimus on immune cells through assays that measure in vivo calcineurin inhibition and markers of immunosuppression such as cytokine concentration. To date, no studies have correlated pharmacodynamic marker assay results with immunosuppressive efficacy, as determined by allograft outcome, or investigated the relationship between calcineurin inhibition and drug adverse effects. Little is known about the magnitude of the pharmacodynamic variability of tacrolimus.

Tacrolimus-induced pain syndrome in a pediatric orthotopic liver transplant patient

Post-transplant complications are common among patients receiving immunosuppressive medications, including pain syndromes. Recently, a pain syndrome, calcineurin-inhibitor induced pain syndrome (CIPS) has been described. To our knowledge, this article is the second report of tacrolimus-associated CIPS, and the first report in the pediatric setting.

"Pseudoseptic" pseudogout associated with hypomagnesemia in liver transplant patients

Hypomagnesemia has been associated with deposition of calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystals in articular structures, causing pseudogout, also known as calcic gout. Occasionally, pseudogout may mimic septic arthritis; this "pseudoseptic" attack may be of especial concern in the immunocompromised host, such as transplant recipient patients, who may be indeed at risk of developing septic arthritis. We report the cases of two patients in whom pseudogout developed after liver transplantation. Synovial fluid appearance and leukocyte counting in synovial fluid mimicked septic arthritis, but calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystals were observed. Magnesium depletion before transplantation and further tacrolimus-induced renal magnesium leakage were probably working in these patients.

Interaction of cyclosporine and FK506 with diuretics in transplant patients

BACKGROUND

The calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and FK506 are widely used for immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation. One of the side effects of these agents is renal magnesium wasting. The site of action and molecular mechanism of this effect are not known. We hypothesized that agents such as diuretics that cause renal magnesium wasting through a similar action would not have an additive effect on magnesium deficiency with calcineurin inhibitors.

METHODS

The records of 50 heart transplant patients on calcineurin inhibitors were reviewed to determine levels of serum magnesium and required replacement dose of magnesium, diuretic usage, and other laboratory values.

RESULTS

Loop diuretics did not change either the magnesium level or magnesium replacement requirements in patients on calcineurin inhibitors. In contrast, the thiazide diuretic resulted in an increase in serum magnesium and a decrease in magnesium replacement. Results were similar when the cyclosporine or FK506 groups were evaluated alone. Patients taking FK506 had lower serum magnesium values and higher requirements for magnesium replacement compared with patients taking cyclosporine.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that calcineurin inhibitors and loop diuretics have a similar site of action.

Tacrolimus: a further update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in the management of organ transplantation

Tacrolimus (FK-506) is an immunosuppressant agent that acts by a variety of different mechanisms which include inhibition of calcineurin. It is used as a therapeutic alternative to cyclosporin, and therefore represents a cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy in organ transplant recipients. Tacrolimus is now well established for primary immunosuppression in liver and kidney transplantation, and experience with its use in other types of solid organ transplantation, including heart, lung, pancreas and intestinal, as well as its use for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT), is rapidly accumulating. Large randomised nonblind multicentre studies conducted in the US and Europe in both liver and kidney transplantation showed similar patient and graft survival rates between treatment groups (although rates were numerically higher with tacrolimus- versus cyclosporin-based immunosuppression in adults with liver transplants), and a consistent statistically significant advantage for tacrolimus with respect to acute rejection rate. Chronic rejection rates were also significantly lower with tacrolimus in a large randomised liver transplantation trial, and a trend towards a lower rate of chronic rejection was noted with tacrolimus in a large multicentre renal transplantation study. In general, a similar trend in overall efficacy has been demonstrated in a number of additional clinical trials comparing tacrolimus- with cyclosporin-based immunosuppression in various types of transplantation. One notable exception is in BMT, where a large randomised trial showed significantly better 2-year patient survival with cyclosporin over tacrolimus, which was primarily attributed to patients with advanced haematological malignancies at the time of (matched sibling donor) BMT. These survival results in BMT require further elucidation. Tacrolimus has also demonstrated efficacy in various types of transplantation as rescue therapy in patients who experience persistent acute rejection (or significant adverse effect's) with cyclosporin-based therapy, whereas cyclosporin has not demonstrated a similar capacity to reverse refractory acute rejection. A corticosteroid-sparing effect has been demonstrated in several studies with tacrolimus, which may be a particularly useful consideration in children receiving transplants. The differences in the tolerability profiles of tacrolimus and cyclosporin may well be an influential factor in selecting the optimal treatment for patients undergoing organ transplantation. Although both drugs have a similar degree of nephrotoxicity, cyclosporin has a higher incidence of significant hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, hirsutism and gingival hyperplasia, while tacrolimus has a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus, some types of neurotoxicity (e.g. tremor, paraesthesia), diarrhoea and alopecia.

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus is an important therapeutic option for the optimal individualisation of immunosuppressive therapy in transplant recipients.