Outcome after steroid withdrawal in renal transplant patients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppression

Steroid avoidance or withdrawal for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Steroid-sparing strategies have been attempted in recent decades to avoid morbidity from long-term steroid intake among kidney transplant recipients. Previous systematic reviews of steroid withdrawal after kidney transplantation have shown a significant increase in acute rejection. There are various protocols to withdraw steroids after kidney transplantation and their possible benefits or harms are subject to systematic review. This is an update of a review first published in 2009.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of steroid withdrawal or avoidance for kidney transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register to 15 February 2016 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which steroids were avoided or withdrawn at any time point after kidney transplantation were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Assessment of risk of bias and data extraction was performed by two authors independently and disagreement resolved by discussion. Statistical analyses were performed using the random-effects model and dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risk (RR) and continuous outcomes as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 48 studies (224 reports) that involved 7803 randomised participants. Of these, three studies were conducted in children (346 participants). The 2009 review included 30 studies (94 reports, 5949 participants). Risk of bias was assessed as low for sequence generation in 19 studies and allocation concealment in 14 studies. Incomplete outcome data were adequately addressed in 22 studies and 37 were free of selective reporting.The 48 included studies evaluated three different comparisons: steroid avoidance or withdrawal compared with steroid maintenance, and steroid avoidance compared with steroid withdrawal. For the adult studies there was no significant difference in patient mortality either in studies comparing steroid withdrawal versus steroid maintenance (10 studies, 1913 participants, death at one year post transplantation: RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.30) or in studies comparing steroid avoidance versus steroid maintenance (10 studies, 1462 participants, death at one year after transplantation: RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.80). Similarly no significant difference in graft loss was found comparing steroid withdrawal versus steroid maintenance (8 studies, 1817 participants, graft loss excluding death with functioning graft at one year after transplantation: RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.92) and comparing steroid avoidance versus steroid maintenance (7 studies, 1211 participants, graft loss excluding death with functioning graft at one year after transplantation: RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.86). The risk of acute rejection significantly increased in patients treated with steroids for less than 14 days after transplantation (7 studies, 835 participants: RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.30) and in patients who were withdrawn from steroids at a later time point after transplantation (10 studies, 1913 participants, RR 1.77, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.61). There was no evidence to suggest a difference in harmful events, such as infection and malignancy, in adult kidney transplant recipients. The effect of steroid withdrawal in children is unclear.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This updated review increases the evidence that steroid avoidance and withdrawal after kidney transplantation significantly increase the risk of acute rejection. There was no evidence to suggest a difference in patient mortality or graft loss up to five year after transplantation, but long-term consequences of steroid avoidance and withdrawal remain unclear until today, because prospective long-term studies have not been conducted.

Steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplantation: is it time to consider it as a standard therapy?

Steroid-free immunosuppression in kidney transplantation has been gaining popularity over the past decade, as documented by a continuous and steady rise in the number of kidney transplant patients discharged on steroid-free regimens. This increased interest in steroid-free immunosuppression is fueled by the recognition that half of transplant loss is related to patient death due to cardiovascular disease and/or infectious complications and that the long-term use of steroids contributes to such elevated cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The availability of newer and more potent immunosuppressive agents has furthered such interest. Many clinical trials over the past two decades have demonstrated the feasibility of steroid-free regimens, at the expense of a slight increase in the rate of acute rejection, which is an important end point in any clinical trial of relatively short duration. The largest epidemiological study to date has reassured the transplant community that the selective use of steroid-free immunosuppression in kidney transplant patients provides no inferior outcome in patient and graft survival at intermediate term. Steroid-free regimens have the potential to improve cardiovascular risk profile. The challenges that remain are to identify the subset of kidney transplant patients who may not benefit from steroid-free immunosuppression and to demonstrate the survival advantage of steroid-free immunosuppresion in suitable kidney transplant candidates.

Steroid avoidance or withdrawal for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Steroid-sparing strategies have been attempted during the last two decades in order to avoid morbidity in kidney transplant recipients. Previous systematic reviews of steroid withdrawal after kidney transplantation have shown significant increases in acute rejection and an increase in graft failure rates. Steroid avoidance in kidney transplantation is increasingly attempted and the possible benefits or harms have never been a subject of a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of steroid withdrawal or avoidance in patients receiving a kidney transplant.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE, references lists and abstracts from international transplantation society scientific meetings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled studies (RCTs) of steroid avoidance or withdrawal were included providing that one treatment arm consisted in steroid avoidance or withdrawal and intention-to-treat rates of acute rejection and graft failure were clearly established after steroid avoidance or use or withdrawal or continuation. Observational studies were tabulated.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and results expressed as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 30 RCTs (5949 participants). Steroid-sparing strategies showed no effect on mortality or graft loss including death. Patients on any steroid-sparing strategy showed a higher risk of graft loss excluding death than those with conventional steroid use (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.52), especially in those not receiving MMF/Myf or everolimus (RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.90). Acute rejection was more frequent with a steroid-sparing strategy (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.40) and more frequent after steroid withdrawal or avoidance when compared with standard steroid treatment when cyclosporin (CsA) was used. Steroid-sparing and withdrawal strategies showed benefits in reducing antihypertensive drug need, serum cholesterol, antihyperlipidaemic drug need, new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) requiring any treatment and cataracts. Steroid avoidance did not alter serum cholesterol, but was associated with less frequent NODAT requiring any treatment. Cardiovascular events were reduced with steroid avoidance. Reduced antihypertensive drug need and serum cholesterol were similar with CsA or tacrolimus (TAC). Reduced antihyperlipidaemic drug need was only evident with TAC, whereas the reduction in NODAT requiring any treatment was only evident with CsA. Infection was lower in steroid-sparing patients using CsA (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.00). NODAT requiring any treatment was less frequent with steroid avoidance than with steroid withdrawal.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review confirms that steroid avoidance and steroid withdrawal strategies in kidney transplantation are not associated with increased mortality or graft loss despite an increase in acute rejection. These immunosuppression strategies may allow safe steroid avoidance or elimination a few days after kidney transplantation if antibody induction treatment is prescribed or after three to six months if such induction is not used.

Early steroid withdrawal therapy in renal transplant recipients: a steroid-free sirolimus and CellCept-based calcineurin inhibitor-minimization protocol

BACKGROUND

Maintenance steroid therapy is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients. Elimination of the many long-term side effects of corticosteroids, including those that impinge on cardiovascular risk, remains a laudable goal in designing immunosuppressive protocols. However, concern persists that prednisone-free maintenance immunotherapy in kidney transplant recipients will result in an increase incidence of acute rejections, renal dysfunction and ultimate graft loss.

METHODS

From 24 March 2003 to 1 December 2004, 84 kidney transplant recipients (61 deceased donor, 23 living donors) discontinued prednisone on post-operative day 6. Immunotherapy consisted of polyclonal antibody induction (thymoglobulin) for five d and prednisone intraoperatively with a rapid taper over the next six d. Maintenance therapy consisted of a sirolimus and CellCept-based calcineurin inhibitor-minimization protocol. Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept) were initiated on day 0. Sirolimus immunotherpay was started on post-operative day 6 concomitant with the cessation of steroids. We compared outcomes with that of our historical controls, treated with sirolimus and tacrolimus, who did not discontinue steroids. In addition, we analyzed outcomes independently for recipients of living and deceased donors in the steroid-free protocol.

RESULTS

The recipients on prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppression had excellent 2.5-yr actuarial patient survival (97%), graft survival (93%), and acceptable acute rejection-free graft survival (89%). The mean serum creatinine level (+/-SD) at one yr was 1.5 +/- 0.6 mg/dL and at two yr was 1.5 +/- 0.6 mg/dL. We noted that 5% of recipients developed cytomegalovirus (CMV) syndrome; 1%, polyoma nephropathy; 1%, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), and 5% developed post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM). In all, 91% of kidney recipients with functioning grafts remain steroid-free as of 31 December 2005. When compared with historical controls, the recipients on the early steroid-withdrawal (ESW) protocol had comparable graft survival, acute rejection-free survival, graft function, but significantly better patient actuarial survival (p = 0.048). In addition, recipients on the steroid-free protocol had decreased prevalence of four risk factors for cardiovascular disease when compared with historical controls: hypertension (p = 0.008), hyperlipidemia (p = 0.003), weight gain (p = 0.024), and incidence of PTDM (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Early steroid-withdrawal in renal transplant recipients with a sirolimus and CellCept-based calcineurin inhibitor-minimimization protocol can effectively reduce many of the steroid-related side effects, decrease risk factors for cardiovascular disease, and is associated with improved recipient survival without compromising graft function.

Two corticosteroid-free regimens-tacrolimus monotherapy after basiliximab administration and tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil-in comparison with a standard triple regimen in renal transplantation: results of the Atlas study

BACKGROUND

The side effects associated with corticosteroids have led to efforts to minimize their use in renal transplant patients. In this study we compared two corticosteroid-free tacrolimus-based regimens with a standard triple therapy.

METHODS

This was a 6-month, phase III, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study. The total analysis set comprised 451 patients, randomized (1:1:1) to receive tacrolimus (Tac) monotherapy following basiliximab (Bas) administration (n=153), Tac/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (n=151), or, Tac/MMF/corticosteroids triple therapy as a control (n=147).

RESULTS

The study was completed by 91.2% (triple therapy), 94.7% (Tac/MMF), and 82.4% (Bas/Tac) of patients. Patient baseline characteristics were similar in all groups. The incidences of biopsy-proven acute rejection were 8.2% (triple therapy), 30.5% (Tac/MMF), and 26.1% (Bas/Tac), p<0.001 (multiple test for comparison with triple therapy); Bas/Tac vs. Tac/MMF, p=ns. The incidences of corticosteroid-resistant acute rejection were 2.0%, 4.0%, and 5.2%, p=ns. Graft survival (95.9%, 96.7%, and 94.7%, p=ns) and patient survival (100%, 99.3%, and 99.3%, p=ns) were similar in all groups. Median serum creatinine at month 6 was 123.0 micromol/L (triple therapy), 134.7 micromol/L (Tac/MMF) and 135.8 micromol/L (Bas/Tac). The overall safety profiles were similar; differences (p<0.05) were reported for anaemia (24.5% vs. 12.6% vs. 14.5%), diarrhoea (12.9% vs. 17.9% vs. 5.9%), and leukopenia (7.5% vs. 18.5% vs. 5.9%) for the triple therapy, Tac/MMF, and Bas/Tac group, respectively. The incidences of new-onset diabetes mellitus were 4.6%, 7.1%, and 1.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Corticosteroid-free immunosuppression was feasible with the Bas/Tac and the Tac/MMF regimens. Both corticosteroid-free regimens were equally effective in preventing acute rejection, with the Bas/Tac therapy offering some safety benefits.

Multivariate analysis of risk factors for acute rejection in early corticosteroid cessation regimens under modern immunosuppression

The purpose of this study was to define risk factors for acute rejection with early corticosteroid withdrawal (CSWD; within 7 days posttransplant) in renal transplantation. Data from prospective, IRB-approved early CSWD trials were analyzed. Overall acute rejection rate in 308 patients was 17.1%. Acute rejection rates and observed risks (OR) in patients with individual risk factors were: repeat transplants 38.6%; current PRA >25%; 29.4%; African Americans 23.5%; delayed graft function (DGF) 26.1%; HLA DR mismatches >0 17.9%; female gender 19.7%; Thymoglobulin induction 15.3%; type 1 diabetes 30.8%; type 2 diabetes 11.1%; deceased donor recipients 21%; and living donor recipients 14%. Logistic regression analysis provided the following risks (OR) for acute rejection: repeat transplant 2.51; current PRA > 25% 1.53; African Americans 1.47; DGF 1.58; HLA DR mismatches > 0 1.61; female gender 1.43; Thymoglobulin induction 0.61; type 1 diabetes 2.23, type 2 diabetes 0.5, deceased donor recipients 1.11, and living donor recipients 0.9. Risk factors for acute rejection under early corticosteroid withdrawal are similar to those previously defined under chronic corticosteroid therapy. These observations provide implications for future CSWD trials including: use of T cell depleting antibody induction therapy (thymoglobulin) to reduce acute rejection risk, 2) enrollment stratification for high risk groups, and 3) modified immunosuppression for high risk groups.

Corticosteroid avoidance in pediatric renal transplantation

Corticosteroids have played a central role in the evolution of renal transplant as the modality of choice for renal replacement in end stage kidney disease. Their use is associated with significant, dose related morbidity including osseous, cardiovascular, metabolic complications, body disfigurement and growth retardation in children. The strategies that have been employed to minimize these side effects include reduction in the daily administered dose of steroids, use of alternate day dosing regimens, steroid withdrawal post-transplantation and complete steroid avoidance. Steroid dose minimization has been associated with increased rates of acute rejection, though introduction of newer and more potent immunosuppressives has helped reduce the incidence of this complication. Steroid minimization will benefit patient morbidity due to cataracts, cardiovascular and osseous complications, but may offer little benefit towards improving linear growth. Alternate day steroid therapy may have a greater impact on growth improvement, but may be troubled by regimen non-adherence. Steroid withdrawal post-transplant, the ultimate target, is successful in a cohort of patients, but overall, has been historically associated with unacceptably high rates of clinical acute rejection, and has thus been used sparingly in adults and even less so in children. Complete corticosteroid avoidance, using newer induction and immunosuppressive agents, has been associated with an 8-23% incidence of acute rejection in pediatric renal transplant patients, significant catch-up growth post-transplant, improvements in post-transplant hypertension and hyperlipidemia, and a high safety profile at current follow-up. Newer induction protocols may allow complete steroid-free immunosuppression thus offering significant advantages in preventing the above-mentioned steroid related morbidity, which could also possibly be applicable to other areas of solid organ transplantation in all age groups.

Corticosteroid avoidance in pediatric renal transplantation: can it be achieved?

Corticosteroids have been a cornerstone therapy in renal transplantation, which is the treatment modality of choice for adult and pediatric end-stage renal disease. Their use is associated with significant morbidity, notably cardiovascular, endocrine, and bone complications, body disfiguration, and almost universal growth retardation in children. While newer immunosuppressants have reduced the incidence of these adverse effects, they continue to pose significant post-transplant challenges. There are various strategies that can be used to avoid these adverse effects including the use of an alternative corticosteroid such as deflazacort, minimization of corticosteroid dosage, corticosteroid withdrawal after a period of early use, and more recently complete corticosteroid avoidance. Recent randomized studies have demonstrated significant improvement in growth parameters, lipid profile, and in the amount of bone loss in patients treated with deflazacort, an oxazoline analog of prednisone, compared with methylprednisone.Corticosteroid minimization has been associated with an increased rate of acute rejection. While augmentation with newer immunosuppressants has helped reduce the incidence of acute rejection, significant improvements in growth have not been demonstrated. Alternate-day corticosteroid therapy has been shown to have a beneficial effect on growth but regimen compliance has limited its widespread applicability. Studies of corticosteroid withdrawal have met with varied success. Early corticosteroid withdrawal has been associated with rejection rates ranging from 10% to 81% and late corticosteroid withdrawal, from 13% to 68.8%, with acute rejection episodes occurring as late as 4 years after corticosteroid withdrawal. The rates of clinical acute rejection have been unacceptably high, and corticosteroid withdrawal is thus used very sparingly in adults and even less so in children. Complete corticosteroid avoidance as reported by an initial study has been associated with a 23% incidence of acute rejection and 'catch-up' growth post-transplantation in 14 pediatric recipients, as measured by the change in height standard deviation scores post-transplantation. A second renal transplant study, in adults, demonstrated similar rejection rates of 25% with improvement in post-transplant hypertension and lipid profiles. A more recent pediatric study using a novel extended daclizumab induction protocol demonstrated an 8% incidence of clinical acute rejection with significant improvements in graft function, hypertension, and growth, without an increased incidence of infectious complications. Renal transplantation with a corticosteroid-free protocol may offer significant advantages in the incidence of acute rejection, graft function, growth, blood pressure, lipidemia, and body appearance and appears to be well tolerated when used with a variety of current induction protocols to replace early corticosteroid use. This protocol may also be applicable to other areas of solid organ transplantation in all age groups.

Successful steroid withdrawal in lung transplant recipients: result of a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

Corticosteroids play a key role in immunosuppression after transplantation. However, because chronic steroid treatment may cause significant morbidity and mortality, steroid-free immunosuppression remains a desirable goal. To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports on successful steroid withdrawal (SW) in lung transplant recipients.

METHODS

The study group included 35 patients who underwent heart-lung, double-lung or single-lung transplantation. Criteria for initiation of SW were stable pulmonary function tests and absence of clinical or bronchoscopic evidence of acute or chronic rejection in the last 6 months. Pulmonary function, blood pressure and metabolic parameters were compared between the patients who underwent SW and those who did not.

RESULTS

Eight patients (23%) underwent SW. Median follow-up was 19 months (range 11-23 months). Compared to the non-withdrawal group, the withdrawal group was older (60+/-6 vs. 52+/-13 years, P=0.01, r=0.49), had higher rates of emphysema (88% vs. 18%, P=0.01) and use of a cyclosporine-based regimen (62% vs. 26%, P=0.0001), and had longer time from transplantation to the withdrawal attempt (70+/-13 vs. 29+/-26 months, P=0.0002). The SW group showed no adverse effects in graft function and no deterioration on pulmonary function tests. SW had a beneficial metabolic effect, with a decrease in mean cholesterol level from 229+/-45 to 194+/-25 mg/dl (P=0.02) and no significant change in weight, systolic blood pressure or glucose level. In the non-withdrawal group, mean cholesterol levels increased from 175+/-34 to 209+/-57 mg/dl (P=0.0005), weight increased from 72+/-15 to 80+/-14 kg (P=0.0001), and systolic blood pressure increased from 125+/-15 to 139+/-16 mmHg (P=0.001); glucose levels did not change. There was a significant correlation between total cholesterol level and weight in both groups (P=0.0006, r=-0.56 and P=0.01, r=-0.46, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Late SW is safe in stable patients after lung transplantation. There was no evidence of rejection or a deterioration in pulmonary function. Lipid profile improvement and blood pressure stabilization accompanied the termination of steroid therapy.

Current treatment practice in immunosuppression

New drugs have recently been added that may eventually replace the two-decade dominance of cyclosporin in solid organ transplantation. This cornerstone of immunosuppression was introduced by Borel [1] and Calne [2] in the mid-70s. In 1989, Starzl et al., after 2 years of preclinical experimentation, introduced tacrolimus (originally designated as FK506 by the Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Company of Japan) as a potent immunosuppressant for liver transplants [3]. Also, in recent years, a variety of novel purine and pyrimidine biosynthesis inhibitors have been tested for transplantation therapy. The leading agent which appears to be replacing the 35-year position occupied by azathioprine is the semi-synthetic morpholinoethyl ester of mycophenolic acid (MPA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), introduced by Allison [4] and Sollinger [5], and developed by the Syntex Corporation (now Roche Pharmaceuticals). Others, affecting different intra- or intercellular messages amplifying immunity, are in the pipeline.

Outcome after steroid withdrawal in pediatric renal transplant patients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids have always been an integral part of immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation. The primary goal of this analysis was to assess the safety of steroid withdrawal in our pediatric renal transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppression.

METHODS

Between December 1989 and December 1996, 82 renal transplantations were performed in pediatric patients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Two of these patients lost their grafts within 3 weeks of transplantation (and were still on steroids at the time of graft loss), and were excluded from further analysis. Seventy-four patients (92.5%) were taken off prednisone a median of 5.7 months after transplantation. Of these 74, 56 (70%) remained off prednisone (OFF), and 18 (22.5%) were restarted on prednisone a median of 14.8 months after discontinuing steroids (OFF --> ON). 6(7.5%) were never taken off prednisone (ON). The mean follow-up was 59 +/- 23 months.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial patient survival rates in the OFF group were 100%, 98%, and 96%, respectively; in the OFF --> ON group, they were 100%, 100%, and 100%, and in the ON group, they were 100%, 83%, and 83%. The 1-, 3-, and 5- year actuarial graft survival rates in the OFF group were 100%, 95%, and 82%, respectively; in the OFF --> ON group, they were 100%, 89%, and 83%; and in the ON group, they were 100%, 50%, and 33%. Two of the six graft losses in the OFF group, three out of four in the OFF --> ON Group, and two out of five in the ON group, were to chronic rejection. A time-dependent Cox regression analysis showed that the hazard for graft failure for those who came and stayed off prednisone was 0.178 relative to those who were never withdrawn from prednisone (P=0.005). Patients who were 10 years of age or younger were withdrawn from prednisone earlier (median: 5 months) than those older than 10 years (median: 7.3 months, P=0.02). In addition, patients who never had acute rejection were withdrawn from steroids earlier (median: 5 months) than those who had one or more episodes of acute rejection (median: 7.6 months, P=0.001). There was no effect of donor age, race, sex, recipient race, sex, cadaveric versus living donor, 48-hr graft function, panel reactive antibody, and total HLA mismatches or matches on the likelihood of being weaned off steroids. Serum creatinine at most recent follow-up in the OFF group was 1.2 +/- 0.5 mg/dl; in the OFF --> ON group, it was 1.8 +/- 0.9 mg/dl, and in the ON group it was 2.0 mg/dl (P<0.003). The incidence of rejection in the OFF, OFF --> ON, and ON groups was 39%, 77%, and 100%, respectively (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that steroid withdrawal in pediatric renal transplant patients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppression is associated with reasonable short- and medium-term patient and graft survival, and acceptable renal function. Patients who discontinue and then resume steroids had patient and graft survival rates comparable with those in patients who discontinue and stay off steroids, but had a higher serum creatinine and a higher incidence of rejection.

Tacrolimus: a further update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in the management of organ transplantation

Tacrolimus (FK-506) is an immunosuppressant agent that acts by a variety of different mechanisms which include inhibition of calcineurin. It is used as a therapeutic alternative to cyclosporin, and therefore represents a cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy in organ transplant recipients. Tacrolimus is now well established for primary immunosuppression in liver and kidney transplantation, and experience with its use in other types of solid organ transplantation, including heart, lung, pancreas and intestinal, as well as its use for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT), is rapidly accumulating. Large randomised nonblind multicentre studies conducted in the US and Europe in both liver and kidney transplantation showed similar patient and graft survival rates between treatment groups (although rates were numerically higher with tacrolimus- versus cyclosporin-based immunosuppression in adults with liver transplants), and a consistent statistically significant advantage for tacrolimus with respect to acute rejection rate. Chronic rejection rates were also significantly lower with tacrolimus in a large randomised liver transplantation trial, and a trend towards a lower rate of chronic rejection was noted with tacrolimus in a large multicentre renal transplantation study. In general, a similar trend in overall efficacy has been demonstrated in a number of additional clinical trials comparing tacrolimus- with cyclosporin-based immunosuppression in various types of transplantation. One notable exception is in BMT, where a large randomised trial showed significantly better 2-year patient survival with cyclosporin over tacrolimus, which was primarily attributed to patients with advanced haematological malignancies at the time of (matched sibling donor) BMT. These survival results in BMT require further elucidation. Tacrolimus has also demonstrated efficacy in various types of transplantation as rescue therapy in patients who experience persistent acute rejection (or significant adverse effect's) with cyclosporin-based therapy, whereas cyclosporin has not demonstrated a similar capacity to reverse refractory acute rejection. A corticosteroid-sparing effect has been demonstrated in several studies with tacrolimus, which may be a particularly useful consideration in children receiving transplants. The differences in the tolerability profiles of tacrolimus and cyclosporin may well be an influential factor in selecting the optimal treatment for patients undergoing organ transplantation. Although both drugs have a similar degree of nephrotoxicity, cyclosporin has a higher incidence of significant hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, hirsutism and gingival hyperplasia, while tacrolimus has a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus, some types of neurotoxicity (e.g. tremor, paraesthesia), diarrhoea and alopecia.

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus is an important therapeutic option for the optimal individualisation of immunosuppressive therapy in transplant recipients.

Results of pancreas transplantation after steroid withdrawal under tacrolimus immunosuppression

PURPOSE

The results of steroid withdrawal in pancreas transplant recipients under tacrolimus immunosuppression were analyzed.

METHODS

From July 4, 1994 until April 30, 1998, 147 pancreas transplantations were performed in 141 patients, including 126 simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantations, 13 pancreas after kidney transplantation, and 8 pancreas transplantations alone. Baseline immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus and steroids without antilymphocyte induction. Twenty-three patients were excluded from analysis because of early graft loss in 17 cases, retransplantation in 5 cases, and simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation after heart transplantation in 1 patient.

RESULTS

With a mean follow-up of 2.8+/-1.1 years (range 1.0 to 4.8 years), complete steroid withdrawal was achieved in 58 (47%) patients with a mean time to steroid withdrawal of 15.2+/-8 months (range 4 to 40 months after transplantation). Of the entire cohort of 141 patients, overall 1-, 2-, and 4-year patient survival rates were 98%, 95.5%, and 86%, respectively. Overall 1-, 2-, and 4-year graft survival rates were 83%, 80%, and 71% (pancreas) and 95%, 91%, and 84% (kidney), respectively. Of the 124 patients analyzed for steroid withdrawal, 1-, 2-, and 4-year patient survival rates were 98%, 97%, and 92%, respectively. Overall 1-, 2-, and 4-year graft survival rates were 98%, 91.5%, 83% (pancreas) and 97%, 95%, and 91% (kidney). Patient, pancreas, and kidney survival rates at 1 year were 100%, 100%, and 98% (off steroids) versus 97%, 91%, and 96% (on steroids, all NS) and at 4 years were 100%, 94%, and 95% (off steroids) versus 78%, 68%, and 85% (on steroids, P = 0.01, 0.002, and NS, respectively). The cumulative risk of rejection at the time of follow-up was 76% for patients on steroids versus 74% for patients off steroids (P = NS). Seven patients originally tapered off steroids were treated for subsequent rejection episodes, which were all steroid sensitive, and two of these seven patients are currently off steroids. Thirteen patients received antilymphocyte therapy for steroid-resistant rejection, five of whom are now off steroids. Tacrolimus trough levels were 9.3+/-2.4 ng/ml (off steroids) and 9.7+/-4.3 (on steroids, P = NS). Mean fasting glucose levels were 98+/-34 mg/dl (off steroids) and 110+/-41 mg/dl (on steroids, P = NS). Mean glycosylated hemoglobin levels were 5.2+/-0.9% (off steroids) and 6.2+/-2.1% (on steroids, P = 0.02), and mean serum creatinine levels were 1.4+/-0.8 mg/dl (off steroids) and 1.7+/-1.0 mg/dl (on steroids, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

These data show for the first time that steroid withdrawal can be safely accomplished in pancreas transplant recipients maintained on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Steroid withdrawal is associated with excellent patient and graft survival with no increase in the cumulative risk of rejection.