ATG induction therapy and the incidence of bronchiolitis obliterans after lung transplantation: does it make a difference?

Lung transplantation for cystic fibrosis: Current concepts and one center's experience

BACKGROUND

Although new approaches to the treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) are significantly prolonging their lives, most patients will eventually develop respiratory failure due to progressive bronchiectasis caused by chronic lung infection and inflammation and die from to respiratory failure. We examined our center's (University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics) experience with lung transplantation for patients with CF and reviewed the literature to examine current and evolving approaches to transplantation for this indication.

METHODS

We reviewed all published literature pertaining to lung transplantation for CF through 2006, and we reviewed all aspects of transplantation for patients with CF at our institution from 1994 to 2005.

RESULTS

Major complications following lung transplantation include acute rejection, bacterial infection, and bronchiolitis obliterans. Five-year survival at UWHC (Kaplan-Meier) is 67%, and survival was not adversely affected by transplanting patients receiving mechanical ventilation. The major cause of death for transplant recipients was bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS).

CONCLUSIONS

Lung transplantation for CF is associated with acceptable survival rates and can improve quality of life. Lung transplant should be offered to all patients with advanced CF lung disease if they meet currently accepted inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Lung transplantation: A decade of experience

BACKGROUND

Over the past 3 decades, the field of lung transplantation has been refined. However, many barriers exist that limit long-term success. The purpose of this study was to review a single institution's long-term experience with single and double lung transplantation and to assess the effect of different immunosuppressive therapies on outcomes.

METHODS

Lung transplant recipients, both single and double, were reviewed, retrospectively. Patients were divided into five groups: group I, all lung transplants (n = 127); group II, single lung transplants (n = 73); group III, double lung transplants (n = 54); group IV, OKT3 induction therapy recipients (n = 27); and group V, RATG induction therapy recipients (n = 100). Rates of survival, rejection, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and infection were analyzed at 1, 3, and 5 years.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in survival, acute rejection rate, freedom from BOS, nor infection between single and double lung transplant recipients. Induction therapy with RATG (group V) was associated with significantly improved survival and freedom from acute rejection, BOS, and infection when compared to OKT3 induction therapy (group IV).

CONCLUSIONS

An earlier impression that RATG is superior to OKT3 induction therapy has borne true in terms of overall survival and incidence of BOS, acute rejection and infection rates. Lung transplantation, using RATG induction therapy, remains an important modality for end-stage pulmonary disease.

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome

BOS remains a difficult problem to control following lung transplantation, largely because of uncertainties regarding the underlying mechanisms that are responsible for it. Continued work on the pathogenesis of BOS is essential. The progressive nature and poor outlook when BOS stage 3 is reached indicates that current strategies should be focused on prevention and early intervention. There is a great need for randomized, controlled trials on intervention if the international transplant community is to make progress in this area.

Risk factors for bronchiolitis obliterans: a systematic review of recent publications

BACKGROUND

Obliterative bronchiolitis remains the major limitation to long-term survival after lung transplantation. A thorough understanding of the factors that confer high risk of developing obliterative bronchiolitis or its physiologic surrogate bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome is important to help define therapeutic strategies.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of studies published since the beginning of 1990. The review excluded non-human studies, publications before 1990, small (less than 25 patients) studies that were predominantly concerned with investigating the pathogenesis of obliterative bronchiolitis, studies solely concerned with diagnosis or treatment of obliterative bronchiolitis, and overlapping studies from the same center. Onset of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome or obliterative bronchiolitis was the outcome of interest.

RESULTS

Acute rejection plays an important role in obliterative bronchiolitis and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome onset, and late rejection is a significant risk factor. Lymphocytic bronchitis/bronchiolitis is also a risk factor, with some evidence that late onset is associated with greater risk. The effects of cytomegalovirus, other infectious organisms, and human leukocyte antigen matching are less clear and require further confirmation. There is little evidence that recipient and donor characteristics play a major role.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review supports the view that obliterative bronchiolitis arises from alloimmunologic injury marked by clinically apparent acute rejection episodes and that inflammatory conditions, including viral infections or ischemic injury, may also play a role. Implications for therapy are discussed.

Induction therapy in lung transplantation: a prospective, controlled clinical trial comparing OKT3, anti-thymocyte globulin, and daclizumab

BACKGROUND

Because acute rejection is associated with inferior outcomes in lung transplantation, we have routinely employed OKT3, anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), or daclizumab as adjuncts to reduce rejection.

METHOD

We performed a 4-year prospective, controlled clinical trial of these 3 therapies to determine differences in post-operative infection, rejection, survival, and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). Eighty-seven consecutive lung transplant patients received OKT3 (n = 30), ATG (n = 34), and daclizumab (n = 23) as induction agents. The groups had similar demographics and immunosuppression protocols differing only in induction agents used.

RESULTS

No differences were observed in immediate post-operative outcomes such as length of hospitalization, ICU stay, or time on ventilators. Twelve months post-transplant, OKT3 had more infections per patient than the other agents, a difference that only became significant 2 months post-operatively (p = 0.009). The most common infection was bacterial and OKT3 had more bacterial infections than any other agent. Daclizumab had more patients remain infection free in the first year (p = 0.02), having no fungal infections and a low rate of viral infections. No patient receiving daclizumab developed drug specific side-effects. Only those patients with episodes of acute rejection developed BOS. There were no significant differences in the freedom from acute rejection or BOS between the groups. The 2-year survival for the entire cohort was 68%, with no differences observed in patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This study again reveals the importance of acute rejection in the subsequent development of BOS. Although daclizumab offers a low risk of post-transplant infection and drug specific side-effects, no drug is superior in delaying rejection or BOS or in prolonging long-term survival.