Use of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil for pancreas-kidney transplantation with or without OKT3 induction

The long-term survival of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant with basiliximab induction therapy

Interleukin-2 receptor (IL2R) antibody has emerged as an attractive induction therapy for organ transplant. However, the long-term outcome of basiliximab induction in simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant remains speculative. We retrospectively analyzed the long-term survivals of 91 consecutive SPK recipients with basiliximab as induction, combination of steroid, tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate acid (MFA)--either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sodium mycophenolate (myfortic) as maintenance. At one, three, five, and seven-yr, the actual patient survival rate were 91.2%, 90.3%, 88.1%, and 88.2%, respectively; kidney graft survivals were 90.1%, 84.7%, 78.6%, and 70.6%, respectively; and pancreas graft survivals were 86.8%, 80.6%, 71.4%, and 58.8% respectively. There was a low incidence of rejection and CMV infection. Basiliximab induction with TAC, MFA, and steroid maintenance therapy can provide excellent long-term outcome for SPK recipients.

Prospective, randomized trial of the effect of antibody induction in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation: three-year results

BACKGROUND

Historically, antibody induction has been used because of the higher immunologic risk of graft loss or rejection observed in simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation compared with kidney transplantation alone. This trial was designed to assess the effect of antibody induction in SPK transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. Induction agents included T-cell-depleting and interleukin-2 receptor antibodies.

METHODS

A total of 174 SPK transplant recipients were enrolled in a prospective, open-label, multi-center study. They were randomized to induction (n=87) or non-induction (n=87) groups and followed for 3 years.

RESULTS

At 3 years, actual patient (94.3% and 89.7%) and pancreas (75.9% and 75.9%) survivals were similar between the induction and non-induction groups, respectively. Actual kidney survival was similar at 1 and 2 years, but at 3 years, it was significantly better in the induction group compared with the non-induction group (92% vs. 81.6%; P =0.04). At 3 years, median serum creatinine and hemoglobin A1C were similar between the induction and non-induction groups (1.35 mg/dL and 1.20 mg/dL, 5.4% and 5.5%, respectively). Three-year cumulative incidence of biopsy-confirmed, treated acute kidney rejection in the induction and non-induction groups was 19.5% and 27.5% (P =0.14), respectively, with odds 4.6 times greater in African Americans regardless of treatment (P =0.004). Significantly higher rates of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia and CMV syndrome occurred in those receiving T-cell-depleting antibody induction (36.1%) when compared with those receiving anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies (2%) and non-induction (8.1%) (P <0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids resulted in excellent safety and efficacy in SPK transplant recipients. Actual 3-year kidney survival was significantly better in the induction group; however, CMV viremia and CMV syndrome rates were significantly higher in the T-cell-depleting antibody group. African Americans demonstrated a significantly greater risk of acute rejection despite antibody induction. Decisions regarding the use of induction therapy must weigh the risk of kidney graft loss or rejection against the risk of infection.

Vascular complications of pancreas transplantation

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to focus on the early diagnosis and treatment of vascular complications after simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation. Description of the technique for salvage of the graft after venous thrombosis (VT) is also provided.

METHODS

From July 1994 to December 2002, 14 patients of 206 SPK transplant recipients had partial VT. Partial splenic VT (PSVT) was documented in 10 patients (4.8%), two had complete thrombosis of the splenic vein, one partial superior mesenteric thrombosis, and one developed partial thrombosis of the splenic and superior mesenteric vein. Four patients developed complete VT of the pancreas allograft and one superior mesenteric artery thrombosis. Our experience with four arteriovenous fistulae is also reported. The immunosuppression included tacrolimus, steroids, and monoclonal antibody to the IL-2 receptor. Thymoglobulin was introduced in June 2000 in our protocol combined with rapamycin or mycophenolate mofetil. These cases were identified following the intravenous (iv) use of tacrolimus with or without anti-IL-2R therapy. One case of complete VT is also reported one month following transplantation in a recipient with high rapamycin levels. Diagnosis was established during routine color Doppler ultrasonography.

RESULTS

Partial VT was effectively treated with anticoagulation. Complete VT required surgical thrombectomy. In our series, the pancreas was salvaged successfully in all patients with the technique described here.

CONCLUSION

Early diagnosis of vascular complications after pancreas transplantation is of paramount importance for the appropriate treatment with organ salvage. Based on our experience, we suggest that VT can be effectively treated with anticoagulation. Aspirin is sufficient for PSVT.

Long-term experience with simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation with portal-enteric drainage and tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression

Refinements in surgical techniques and advances in clinical immunosuppression have led to steadily improving results in pancreas transplantation (PTX). Although there is renewed interest in enteric exocrine drainage, most PTXs are performed with systemic venous delivery of insulin. To improve the physiology of PTX, we developed a novel technique of portal venous delivery of insulin and enteric drainage of the exocrine secretions (portal-enteric [P-E]). The purpose of the study was to analyse outcomes in patients undergoing PTX with P-E drainage and contemporary immunosuppression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 1997 through September 2002, we performed 67 primary simultaneous kidney-PTXs (SKPT) with P-E drainage. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids. No antibody induction therapy occurred in 33 patients (49%) with the remainder receiving daclizumab (n = 15), basiliximab (n = 2), or thymoglobulin (n = 14) induction therapy. The patient group included 38 males and 29 females with a mean age of 39.7 year (range 23-58) and a mean duration of pretransplant diabetes of 24.5 year (9-46). Fourteen patients (21%) were African-American.

RESULTS

The mean waiting time for SKPT was 3.3 months (range 0.1-10). Mean kidney and pancreas cold ischaemia times were 15.1 and 15.4 h, respectively. Patient, kidney and pancreas graft survival rates were 97%, 92.5% and 82%, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 20 months (range 1-56). Two deaths (one sepsis, one cardiac event) occurred at 1 month after SKPT; both patients died with functioning grafts (DWFG). Three patients (4.5%) had delayed renal allograft function and received temporary dialysis after SKPT. Five kidney graft losses occurred (two DWFG, one thrombosis, two chronic rejection). All but four patients (6%) had immediate PTX function. A total of 12 pancreas graft losses occurred (two DWFG, five thrombosis, five chronic rejection). The incidence of acute rejection was 28%, but no grafts were lost due to isolated acute rejection. The incidence of major infection was 51%, but only five patients (7.5%) developed cytomegalovirus infection. A total of 19 patients (28%) underwent early relaparotomy within 3 months of SKPT. The composite endpoint of no rejection, graft loss, or mortality was attained by 63% of patients. At present, 58 patients (87%) are both dialysis and insulin-independent (including four retransplants).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that SKPT with P-E drainage and contemporary immunosuppression may result in excellent intermediate-term outcomes.

Prospective, randomized, multi-center trial of antibody induction therapy in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

A randomized, multicenter, prospective study was conducted at 18 pancreas transplant centers in the United States to determine the role of induction therapy in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation. One hundred and 74 recipients were enrolled: 87 recipients each in the induction and noninduction treatment arms. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups for patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival at 1-year. The 1-year cumulative incidence of any treated biopsy-confirmed or presumptive rejection episodes (kidney or pancreas) in the induction and noninduction treatment arms was 24.6% and 31.2% (p = 0.28), respectively. The 1-year cumulative incidence of biopsy-confirmed, treated, acute kidney allograft rejection in the induction and noninduction treatment arms was 13.1% and 23.0% (p = 0.08), respectively. Biopsy-confirmed kidney allograft rejection occurred later post-transplant and appeared to be less severe among recipients that received induction therapy. The highest rate of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia/syndrome was observed in the subgroup of recipients who received T-cell depleting antibody induction and received organs from CMV serologically positive donors. Decisions regarding the routine use of induction therapy in SPK transplantation must take into consideration its differential effects on risk of rejection and infection.

Two-dose daclizumab regimen in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients: primary endpoint analysis of a multicenter, randomized study

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists about the optimal immunosuppressive regimen in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SKPT) recipients. This study determined the safety and efficacy of two dosing regimens of daclizumab compared with no antibody induction in SKPT recipients receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids.

METHODS

A total of 297 SKPT patients were enrolled in this prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label study. The patients were randomized into three groups: daclizumab 1 mg/kg per dose every 14 days for five doses (group I, n=107), daclizumab 2 mg/kg per dose every 14 days for two doses (group II, n=112), and no antibody induction (group III, n=78). All patients received tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids as maintenance immunosuppression.

RESULTS

Demographic and transplant characteristics were similar among the groups. At 6 months, there were no differences in patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival rates among the three groups. The probability of either kidney or pancreas allograft rejection at 6 months was 21%, 17%, and 32% in groups I, II, and III, respectively (P=0.042). The median time to first acute rejection of either the kidney or pancreas was 23 days in group I, 44 days in group II, and 20 days in group III (group I vs. II, P=0.078; group II vs. III, P=0.016). At 6 months, the actuarial event-free survival (no acute rejection, allograft loss, or death) rates were 66%, 77%, and 56% in groups I, II, and III, respectively (group I vs. III, P=0.119; group II vs. III, P=0.002). There were no differences in the incidence of serious adverse events including infectious complications among the groups. All three groups demonstrate excellent kidney and pancreas function at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Daclizumab is safe and effective in reducing the incidence of acute rejection in SKPT recipients compared with no antibody induction. Moreover, the two-dose regimen of daclizumab (2 mg/kg on days 0 and 14) compares favorably with the standard five-dose regimen.

Improving results in solitary pancreas transplantation with portal-enteric drainage, thymoglobin induction, and tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression

Advances in surgical techniques and clinical immunosuppression have led to steadily improving results in pancreas transplantation (PTX). The purpose of this study was to analyze retrospectively the outcomes in patients undergoing solitary PTX with portal-enteric (P-E) drainage and contemporary immunosuppression. From June 1998 through December 2000, we performed 28 solitary PTXs with antibody induction and tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil maintenance therapy. The first 13 patients received daclizumab (DAC) induction, while the next 15 received thymoglobulin (rabbit anti-human thymocyte gamma globulin; Thymo) induction. The study group included 13 pancreas alone (PA) and 15 sequential pancreas-after-kidney-transplantations (PAKT). Solitary PTX was performed with P-E drainage in 18 patients and systemic-enteric (S-E) drainage in ten. Patient and pancreas graft survival rates were 96% and 79%, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 22 (range 1-39) months. The 1-year actual death-censored pancreas graft survival rate was 89%. One PAKT patient died with a functioning graft at 1 month; three patients (11%) experienced early graft loss due to thrombosis and were excluded from the immunological analysis, leaving 24 evaluable patients. The incidence of acute rejection was 54%, including 50% in PA and 58% in PAKT recipients ( P=NS). In patients receiving Thymo induction, the rate of acute rejection was slightly lower (43% Thymo vs 70% DAC). Moreover, P-E drainage was associated with a slightly lower rate of acute rejection (44% P-E vs 75% S-E; P=NS). In patients with both Thymo induction and P-E drainage ( n=11), there was a tendency toward less rejection (the incidence of acute rejection was 36%). Two immunological graft losses occurred (one due to non-compliance), both in patients with P-E drainage. Only one patient had a cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Event-free survival (no rejection, graft loss, or death) was slightly higher in patients receiving Thymo (47%) than in those on DAC (23%) induction ( P=NS). We can conclude that solitary PTX with P-E drainage and Thymo induction may be associated with improved intermediate-term outcomes and a possible immunological advantage.

Initial clinical experience with interleukin-2 receptor antagonist induction in combination with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation

Since 1996, our standard immunosuppressive protocol for simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SKPT) has been tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids without antibody induction. When basiliximab and daclizumab, monoclonal antibodies directed against the interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R), became available, we selectively added these agents to our standard protocol. The purpose of this prospective, open-label study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IL-2 receptor antagonists in SKPT. From April 1998 to August 1999, 35 SKPTS were performed. One patient with delayed graft function received Thymoglobulin and was excluded; 17 received no induction, and 17 received IL-2R antagonists (9 basiliximab, 8 daclizumab) as induction. Demographic- and transplant characteristics were similar between the two groups. At 6 months, patient survival was 88 % (15/17) in the induction arm compared to 100 % (17/17) in the no-induction arm, P = NS. The 2 causes of death were sepsis and hemolytic uremic syndrome, and both patients died with functioning grafts. Death-censored pancreas and kidney graft survival rates in the induction and the no-induction groups were 88 % vs. 100 % respectively, in both groups. The incidence of acute rejection (kidney or pancreas) at 6 months did not differ between the two groups (35 % in both groups). Biopsy proven pancreas and kidney acute rejections were 35 % vs. 24 % and 12 % vs. 12 % in the induction- and no-induction groups, respectively. The incidences of major infection and readmission did not differ between groups. TAC trough levels and mean daily doses of TAC, MMF and steroids did not differ between the two groups at 1, 3, and 6 months. The incidence of event-free survival (no death, rejection, or graft loss) at 6 months was 59 % (10/17) in the induction and 65 % (11/17) in the no-induction group. Basiliximab and daclizumab appear to be safe in SKPT. However, the preliminary results of this study do not demonstrate a significant benefit in either reducing the incidence of acute rejection or improving outcomes at 6 months. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.

A multicenter, open-label, comparative trial of two daclizumab dosing strategies vs. no antibody induction in combination with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids for the prevention of acute rejection in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients: interim analysis

INTRODUCTION

The safety and efficacy of daclizumab (1 mg/kg/dose every 14 d for five doses) has been established in kidney and heart transplant recipients. Alternative dosing regimens based on pharmacokinetic simulation and limited clinical trials are being investigated. The purpose of this ongoing multicenter study is to determine the safety and efficacy of two dosing regimens of daclizumab as an adjunctive immunosuppressive agent compared with no antibody induction in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SKPT) recipients receiving tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids as primary immunosuppression.

METHODS

This is an interim report of a multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized study with a target enrolment of 290 patients. Eligible SKPT patients were randomized to one of three groups: daclizumab 1 mg/kg/dose every 14 d for five doses (Group I), daclizumab 2 mg/kg/dose every 14 d for two doses (Group II), and no antibody induction (Group III). The primary endpoint of the study is a composite of the incidence of presumed or biopsy-proven kidney or pancreas rejection, graft loss, or death within the first 6 months post-transplantation.

RESULTS

A total of 166 patients were randomized into the three groups [Group I (n = 70), Group II (n = 74), Group III (n = 22)]. Demographic and transplant characteristics were similar among the groups. At a minimum follow-up of 3 months, patient, kidney and pancreas graft survival rates were similar among the three groups. However, the rates of acute renal allograft rejection were 18% (Group I), 8% (Group II), and 36% (Group III), p < 0.05. The probabilities of either kidney or pancreas allograft rejection were 22% (Group I), 8% (Group II), and 38% (Group III). At 3 months, the actuarial event-free survival (no acute rejection, allograft loss, or death) rates were 67, 81 and 50% in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. There were no differences in the incidence of infectious complications among the groups and no serious adverse events associated with daclizumab were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The two-dose regimen (Group II) appears to be as effective as the five-dose regimen (Group I) in preventing acute rejection after SKPT and is associated with the lowest acute rejection rates and the highest rate of event-free survival (no rejection or graft loss). However, the benefits of daclizumab compared with no antibody induction await larger sample size accrual.

Multicenter survey of daclizumab induction in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients

We report an experience with 71 simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SKPT) recipients receiving daclizumab induction in combination with tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroids. The mean follow-up time was 5.9+/-2.5 (SD) months (range 0.5-11 months). The study population included 47 males (65%) and 24 females (35%) with a mean age of 40+/-8 years. The mean pretransplant duration of diabetes and dialysis were 25+/-8 and 1.5+/-0.9 years (34 hemodialysis, 16 peritoneal dialysis), respectively. Mean HLA match was 1.2+/-1.5, with one patient receiving a second transplant. The mean cold ischemic times for the kidney and the pancreas were 15+/-5 and 16+/-4 hr, respectively. Six-month patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival and rejection rates were 97, 96, 93, and 35%, respectively. There were two deaths, one due to fungal infection and the other due to a cardiac event. There were three kidney graft losses, two immunological, and one death with function. Of the five pancreas graft losses, two were due to infection, one immunological, one thrombosis, and one death with function. The patient population was then stratified according to the number of daclizumab doses: 4-5 doses (n=45) or 1-3 doses (n=26). There were no differences in patient and kidney graft survival rates, 98 vs. 96%, and 92 vs. 92%, respectively. However, there was a trend toward improved pancreas graft survival in the group receiving 4-5 doses (96%) compared with 1-3 doses (85%), P=0.07. Although more patients receiving 1-3 doses had rejection (54%) than patients receiving 4-5 doses (24%), there was no dose response relationship between the total number of doses or the adjusted total mg/kg dose and time to rejection. All patients with functioning grafts have good renal and pancreas allograft function at 6 and 12 months. The overall incidence of major infection was 27% and there were no differences in the incidence of infection between the two groups. No major adverse events were attributed to daclizumab use. In conclusion, excellent short-term outcomes were noted in this retrospective, multicenter survey of initial experience with daclizumab induction in combination with TAC, MMF, and steroids in SKPT recipients. Optimal dosing strategies for SKPT recipients remain to be determined.

Lessons learned from more than 1,000 pancreas transplants at a single institution

OBJECTIVE

To determine outcome in diabetic pancreas transplant recipients according to risk factors and the surgical techniques and immunosuppressive protocols that evolved during a 33-year period at a single institution.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is associated with a high incidence of management problems and secondary complications. Clinical pancreas transplantation began at the University of Minnesota in 1966, initially with a high failure rate, but outcome improved in parallel with other organ transplants. The authors retrospectively analyzed the factors associated with the increased success rate of pancreas transplants.

METHODS

From December 16, 1966, to March 31, 2000, the authors performed 1,194 pancreas transplants (111 from living donors; 191 retransplants): 498 simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) and 1 simultaneous pancreas-liver transplant; 404 pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplants; and 291 pancreas transplants alone (PTA). The analyses were divided into five eras: era 0, 1966 to 1973 (n = 14), historical; era 1, 1978 to 1986 (n = 148), transition to cyclosporine for immunosuppression, multiple duct management techniques, and only solitary (PAK and PTA) transplants; era 2, 1986 to 1994 (n = 461), all categories (SPK, PAK, and PTA), predominantly bladder drainage for graft duct management, and primarily triple therapy (cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone) for maintenance immunosuppression; era 3, 1994 to 1998 (n = 286), tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil used; and era 4, 1998 to 2000 (n = 275), use of daclizumab for induction immunosuppression, primarily enteric drainage for SPK transplants, pretransplant immunosuppression in candidates awaiting PTA.

RESULTS

Patient and primary cadaver pancreas graft functional (insulin-independence) survival rates at 1 year by category and era were as follows: SPK, era 2 (n = 214) versus eras 3 and 4 combined (n = 212), 85% and 64% versus 92% and 79%, respectively; PAK, era 1 (n = 36) versus 2 (n = 61) versus 3 (n = 84) versus 4 (n = 92), 86% and 17%, 98% and 59%, 98% and 76%, and 98% and 81%, respectively; in PTA, era 1 (n = 36) versus 2 (n = 72) versus 3 (n = 30) versus 4 (n = 40), 77% and 31%, 99% and 50%, 90% and 67%, and 100% and 88%, respectively. In eras 3 and 4 combined for primary cadaver SPK transplants, pancreas graft survival rates were significantly higher with bladder drainage (n = 136) than enteric drainage (n = 70), 82% versus 74% at 1 year (P =.03). Increasing recipient age had an adverse effect on outcome only in SPK recipients. Vascular disease was common (in eras 3 and 4, 27% of SPK recipients had a pretransplant myocardial infarction and 40% had a coronary artery bypass); those with no vascular disease had significantly higher patient and graft survival rates in the SPK and PAK categories. Living donor segmental pancreas transplants were associated with higher technically successful graft survival rates in each era, predominately solitary (PAK and PTA) in eras 1 and 2 and SPK in eras 3 and 4. Diabetic secondary complications were ameliorated in some recipients, and quality of life studies showed significant gains after the transplant in all recipient categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient and graft survival rates have significantly improved over time as surgical techniques and immunosuppressive protocols have evolved. Eventually, islet transplants will replace pancreas transplants for suitable candidates, but currently pancreas transplants can be applied and should be an option at all stages of diabetes. Early transplants are preferable for labile diabetes, but even patients with advanced complications can benefit.

The use of intravenous tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil as induction and maintenance immunosuppression in simultaneous pancreas--kidney recipients with previous transplants

Clinical trials using quadruple immunosuppression that include the combination of tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have been shown to reduce the incidence of acute rejection episodes in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation. In attempting to obtain a low rejection rate without antibody induction therapy, we proceeded with the combination of TAC intravenous (i.v.), MMF, and steroids as induction therapy and as primary immunosuppression for recipients with previous transplants. In this study, we analyzed 10 patients who received previous transplants, treated with low-dose TAC i.v. as induction therapy. Group A consisted of 6 patients with previous transplants that underwent SPK and group B consisted of four recipients with previous SPK that underwent cadaveric kidney transplants. For group A, the previous transplants were: living related kidney (LRK) followed by islet cell (IC) transplant (n=2), LRK transplant (n=1), cadaver kidney (CAD) and IC transplant (n=1), SPK (n=1), and three previous CAD kidney transplants (n=1). In group A, all six kidneys were lost due to recurrent diabetic nephropathy, IC possibly to rejection, and the pancreas due to thrombosis. In group B with previous SPK transplants, three recipients lost their kidney to chronic rejection and one to long-term use of a nephrotoxic antibiotic. Currently, in all group A and B patients, the kidney and the pancreas are functioning, although 1 patient in group A developed type 2 diabetes (normal fasting C-peptide). Two patients in group A developed three rejection episodes that responded to steroid treatment. The results indicate the TAC i.v. in combination with oral TAC, MMF, and steroids offer effective induction therapy in patients with previous transplants.

Partial venous thrombosis of the pancreatic allografts after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

Despite new advances in transplantation, complete venous thrombosis (VT) of the pancreas after simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK) transplantation usually results in graft loss. Data are limited regarding the outcome and treatment of partial VT of the pancreas allograft. From July 1994 to December 1999, 126 patients with IDDM/end-stage renal disease underwent SPK with systemic bladder drainage at the University of Miami. We retrospectively reviewed our experience regarding the outcome and treatment options of partial VT of the pancreas allografts. From July 1994 to April 1997, partial VT was not seen in the first 66 SPK patients induced with anti-CD3 rnAb and oral or intravenous (i.v.) tacrolimus (TAC) in the operating room. From May 1997 to June 1999, 14 (29%) out of 48 patients had VT. These cases were identified following the i.v. use of TAC with anti-IL-2R antibody-induction therapy (7/15) or without (7/33). Partial thrombosis of the splenic vein (PTSV) was documented in 10 patients, 2 had complete thrombosis of the splenic vein (CTSV), 1 had partial thrombosis of the superior mesenteric vein (PTSMV), and 1 patient had PTSV and PTSMV. These were identified incidentally during routine color Doppler ultrasonography (CDU). None of these SPK recipients demonstrates a change in clinical parameters. The first 8 patients were systemically heparinized, followed by oral anticoagulation, except 1 patient with CTSV. He progressed to complete thrombosis of the pancreas allograft and was treated with percutaneous thrombectomy and urokinase infusion, followed by heparinization and oral anticoagulation. One patient required exploration for bleeding. In an attempt to reduce the morbidity of heparinization, we treated the next 6 patients with PTSV with aspirin followed by serial CDU. All 14 patients had preservation of the endocrine and exocrine pancreatic functions. CDU showed resolution with recanalization of the thrombosed vein(s). From July 1999 to December 1999, 12 SPK recipients were administered TAC orally with or without induction therapy with anti-IL-2R antibody. So far, in this group, VT has not been identified. In summary, a total of 14 out of 126 patients (11%) had isolated VT with a mean follow-up of 36.4 months. Based on our experience, we suggest that extensive VT after pancreas transplantation, including splenic and superior mesenteric VT, be treated with heparin and subsequent oral anticoagulation for 3 months. For more limited, partial splenic VT, aspirin may be sufficient. Follow-up CDU is critical for a successful outcome. The i.v. use of TAC appears to be a risk factor for the increased incidence of VT. Currently, using IL-2rmAb as induction, TAC is started orally on postoperative days 3 or 4 and aspirin on postoperative day 2.

Tacrolimus: a further update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in the management of organ transplantation

Tacrolimus (FK-506) is an immunosuppressant agent that acts by a variety of different mechanisms which include inhibition of calcineurin. It is used as a therapeutic alternative to cyclosporin, and therefore represents a cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy in organ transplant recipients. Tacrolimus is now well established for primary immunosuppression in liver and kidney transplantation, and experience with its use in other types of solid organ transplantation, including heart, lung, pancreas and intestinal, as well as its use for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT), is rapidly accumulating. Large randomised nonblind multicentre studies conducted in the US and Europe in both liver and kidney transplantation showed similar patient and graft survival rates between treatment groups (although rates were numerically higher with tacrolimus- versus cyclosporin-based immunosuppression in adults with liver transplants), and a consistent statistically significant advantage for tacrolimus with respect to acute rejection rate. Chronic rejection rates were also significantly lower with tacrolimus in a large randomised liver transplantation trial, and a trend towards a lower rate of chronic rejection was noted with tacrolimus in a large multicentre renal transplantation study. In general, a similar trend in overall efficacy has been demonstrated in a number of additional clinical trials comparing tacrolimus- with cyclosporin-based immunosuppression in various types of transplantation. One notable exception is in BMT, where a large randomised trial showed significantly better 2-year patient survival with cyclosporin over tacrolimus, which was primarily attributed to patients with advanced haematological malignancies at the time of (matched sibling donor) BMT. These survival results in BMT require further elucidation. Tacrolimus has also demonstrated efficacy in various types of transplantation as rescue therapy in patients who experience persistent acute rejection (or significant adverse effect's) with cyclosporin-based therapy, whereas cyclosporin has not demonstrated a similar capacity to reverse refractory acute rejection. A corticosteroid-sparing effect has been demonstrated in several studies with tacrolimus, which may be a particularly useful consideration in children receiving transplants. The differences in the tolerability profiles of tacrolimus and cyclosporin may well be an influential factor in selecting the optimal treatment for patients undergoing organ transplantation. Although both drugs have a similar degree of nephrotoxicity, cyclosporin has a higher incidence of significant hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, hirsutism and gingival hyperplasia, while tacrolimus has a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus, some types of neurotoxicity (e.g. tremor, paraesthesia), diarrhoea and alopecia.

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus is an important therapeutic option for the optimal individualisation of immunosuppressive therapy in transplant recipients.

Results of pancreas transplantation after steroid withdrawal under tacrolimus immunosuppression

PURPOSE

The results of steroid withdrawal in pancreas transplant recipients under tacrolimus immunosuppression were analyzed.

METHODS

From July 4, 1994 until April 30, 1998, 147 pancreas transplantations were performed in 141 patients, including 126 simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantations, 13 pancreas after kidney transplantation, and 8 pancreas transplantations alone. Baseline immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus and steroids without antilymphocyte induction. Twenty-three patients were excluded from analysis because of early graft loss in 17 cases, retransplantation in 5 cases, and simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation after heart transplantation in 1 patient.

RESULTS

With a mean follow-up of 2.8+/-1.1 years (range 1.0 to 4.8 years), complete steroid withdrawal was achieved in 58 (47%) patients with a mean time to steroid withdrawal of 15.2+/-8 months (range 4 to 40 months after transplantation). Of the entire cohort of 141 patients, overall 1-, 2-, and 4-year patient survival rates were 98%, 95.5%, and 86%, respectively. Overall 1-, 2-, and 4-year graft survival rates were 83%, 80%, and 71% (pancreas) and 95%, 91%, and 84% (kidney), respectively. Of the 124 patients analyzed for steroid withdrawal, 1-, 2-, and 4-year patient survival rates were 98%, 97%, and 92%, respectively. Overall 1-, 2-, and 4-year graft survival rates were 98%, 91.5%, 83% (pancreas) and 97%, 95%, and 91% (kidney). Patient, pancreas, and kidney survival rates at 1 year were 100%, 100%, and 98% (off steroids) versus 97%, 91%, and 96% (on steroids, all NS) and at 4 years were 100%, 94%, and 95% (off steroids) versus 78%, 68%, and 85% (on steroids, P = 0.01, 0.002, and NS, respectively). The cumulative risk of rejection at the time of follow-up was 76% for patients on steroids versus 74% for patients off steroids (P = NS). Seven patients originally tapered off steroids were treated for subsequent rejection episodes, which were all steroid sensitive, and two of these seven patients are currently off steroids. Thirteen patients received antilymphocyte therapy for steroid-resistant rejection, five of whom are now off steroids. Tacrolimus trough levels were 9.3+/-2.4 ng/ml (off steroids) and 9.7+/-4.3 (on steroids, P = NS). Mean fasting glucose levels were 98+/-34 mg/dl (off steroids) and 110+/-41 mg/dl (on steroids, P = NS). Mean glycosylated hemoglobin levels were 5.2+/-0.9% (off steroids) and 6.2+/-2.1% (on steroids, P = 0.02), and mean serum creatinine levels were 1.4+/-0.8 mg/dl (off steroids) and 1.7+/-1.0 mg/dl (on steroids, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

These data show for the first time that steroid withdrawal can be safely accomplished in pancreas transplant recipients maintained on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Steroid withdrawal is associated with excellent patient and graft survival with no increase in the cumulative risk of rejection.

Simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation without antilymphocyte induction

BACKGROUND

The introduction of potent new immunosuppressive agents may allow simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation to be performed without antilymphocyte induction.

METHODS

We analyzed 30 simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantations receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids without without antilymphocyte induction. Eighteen patients underwent pancreas transplantation with portal-enteric (P-E) drainage and the remaining 12 had systemic bladder (S-B) drainage. Target 12 hr trough tacrolimus levels for the first 3 months after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation were 15-20 ng/ml. The oral mycophenolate mofetil dose was 2-3 g/day begun immediately posttransplant in two to four divided doses. Steroids were tapered according to protocol.

RESULTS

All patients experienced immediate function of both kidney and pancreas grafts. One-year actuarial patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival rates are 93, 93, and 90%, respectively. Nine patients (30%) had a total of 13 rejection episodes (12 biopsy proven) including 4 within 2 weeks, 6 between 2 weeks and 3 months, and 3 beyond 3 months after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation. Three rejection episodes were treated with steroids alone and 10 were treated with antilymphocyte therapy (5 OKT3 and 5 ATGAM). A total of seven patients (23%) received antilymphocyte therapy. Three patients (10%) had more than one rejection episode. Two pancreas grafts (7%) and one kidney graft (3%) were lost from rejection. Four patients (13%) developed cytomegalovirus infection, but none had tissue-invasive cytomegalovirus. At present, 22 surviving patients (81%) remain on triple immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone with excellent dual graft function.

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone immunosuppression without without antilymphocyte induction is safe and effective after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation.

Evolution in pancreas transplantation techniques: simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation using portal-enteric drainage without antilymphocyte induction

OBJECTIVE

To report initial experience with the combination of a novel technique of portal-enteric pancreas transplantation with newer immunosuppressive strategies that eliminate antilymphocyte induction therapy.

BACKGROUND

A new surgical technique of pancreas transplantation has been developed with portal venous delivery of insulin and enteric drainage of the exocrine secretions (portal-enteric). The introduction of potent immunosuppressive agents may allow simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplants (SKPT) to be performed without antilymphocyte induction.

METHODS

From September 1996 to November 1998, the authors performed 28 primary SKPTs with portal-enteric drainage and no antilymphocyte induction. All patients received triple immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. The study group had a mean age of 38 years and a mean preoperative duration of diabetes of 25 years. Four patients (14%) had prior kidney transplants.

RESULTS

All patients had immediate renal allograft function. Actual patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival rates were 86%, 82%, and 82%, respectively, after a mean follow-up of 12 months. Four patients died, three as a result of cardiac events unrelated to SKPT. Five kidney and five pancreas grafts were lost, including five deaths with function and three cases of chronic rejection. The mean length of stay and total charges for the initial hospital stay were 12.5 days and $99,517. The mean number of readmissions was 2.9, and 10 patients (36%) had no readmissions. Six patients (21 %) developed acute rejection, with five (18%) receiving antilymphocyte therapy. Seven patients (25%) underwent relaparotomy, including two (7%) for intraabdominal infection. Nine patients (32%) had major infections, including three (11%) with cytomegaloviral infection. Of the 24 surviving patients, 22 (92%) are both dialysis- and insulin-free.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary results suggest that SKPT with portal-enteric drainage without antilymphocyte induction can be performed with excellent outcomes.

Immunosuppression in pancreas transplantation: progress, problems and perspective

Through 1997, over 10,000 pancreas transplants have been performed world-wide, with 88% being simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplants (SKPTs). Current 1-year patient survival exceeds 90% and pancreas graft survival (complete insulin independence) exceeds 80% for SKPT, 70% for sequential pancreas after kidney transplant (PAKT), and 65% for pancreas transplant alone (PTA). According to Registry data, rejection accounts for 32% of graft failures in the first year after pancreas transplantation. However, improving outcomes are expected to continue with the evolution of treatment protocols. Most pancreas transplant centres employ quadruple drug immunosuppression with anti-lymphocyte induction, using either a monoclonal or polyclonal antibody agent. In recent years, there has been an overall decline in the use of antibody-induction therapy from 90% during 1987-93, to 83% of pancreas transplants performed during 1994-97. Maintenance immunosuppression is triple therapy consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus), corticosteroids, and an anti-metabolite such as azathioprine (AZA) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Prior to 1995, nearly all pancreas transplant recipients were managed with Sandimmune. Since 1986, tacrolimus-based therapy has been used in approximately 20% of cases, and a new microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine (Neoral) has replaced Sandimmune in contemporary post-transplant immunosuppression. In addition, MMF is replacing AZA as part of the standard immunosuppressive regimen following pancreas transplantation. At present, a number of centres are conducting various trials with new drug combinations including either Neoral or tacrolimus in combination with steroids and MMF, with or without antibody-induction therapy. From 1994 to 1997, the 1-year rates of immunologic graft loss have decreased to 2% after SKPT, 9% after PAKT, and 16% after PTA. The current array of new immunosuppressive agents are providing more effective control of rejection and permitting solitary pancreas transplantation to become an accepted treatment option in diabetic patients without advanced complications. The apparent potency of new drug combinations has also resulted in a resurgence of interest in steroid withdrawal. Immunosuppressive strategies will continue to evolve to achieve effective control of rejection while minimizing injury to the allograft and risk to the patient. In addition, new regimens must not only address the issue of specific drug toxicities, but also long-term economic, metabolic, and quality of life outcomes. Pancreas transplantation will remain an important alternative in the treatment of diabetic patients until other strategies are developed that can provide equal glycaemic control with less immunosuppression and overall morbidity.