Microchimerism is associated with long-term graft acceptance in combined liver/small bowel transplantation

Chronic rejection of small bowel grafts: pediatric and adult study of risk factors and morphologic progression

One hundred and seventy-two patients underwent small bowel transplantation at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between May 1990 and August 2001. Thirty-four patients had complete or partial resection of their primary graft and in 15, histologic features of chronic rejection were present in the resected small bowel. This is a descriptive and correlative study of the demographic, perioperative, and histologic features associated with progression to intestinal graft failure. Variable features associated with an increased risk of chronic rejection included acute rejection within the 1st month, increased number and higher grade of acute rejection episodes, isolated small bowel grafts rather than small bowel-liver grafts, older recipient age, non-Caucasian race, and Caucasian to non-Caucasian transplant. The mucosal biopsies showed predictive changes many months before the grafts were excised. The mucosal biopsy diagnosis of chronic vascular rejection can be difficult because the affected vessels, the distal branches of the mesenteric arteries, and the larger arteries of the subserosa and submucosa are not routinely sampled. The possibility of underlying arteriopathy, however, can be inferred in some instances from the presence of secondary mucosal changes in the small bowel biopsies though the "early" changes lack specificity. It is the progression of biopsy findings over time that is predictive of outcome. It is important to recognize the persistence of "late" mucosal changes of chronic rejection so that patients are not subjected to increased immune suppression when it is unlikely to be of significant benefit.

Combined small bowel and reduced auxiliary liver transplantation: Case report

AIM: To present a case of combined small bowel and reduced auxiliary liver transplantation.

METHODS: A 55-year-old patient with short bowel syndrome and TPN-related liver dysfunction received small bowel transplantation combined with a reduced auxiliary liver graft. A liver was added to restore the patient's liver function and to protect the intestinal allograft from rejection. His own liver was not removed.

RESULTS: Without donor pretreatment and by conventional immunosuppresive therapy following transplantation, the patient experienced had only one episode of mild intestinal rejection, which was easily reversed by treatment with Methylprednisolone. No liver rejection occurred. Unfortunately, the patient died of heart and lung failure 30 d after transplantation, despite successful graft replacement. Histopathologic examination of specimens after death demonstrated normal structure in both intestinal and liver grafts.

CONCLUSION: The auxiliary liver graft might play a role in preventing intestinal allograft rejection. However, the observation period in this case is short. Further study is needed to determine the risks, effect on the protecting the small-bowel from rejection, and feasibility of general application of this procedure.