Pediatric liver transplantation from living-related donors

Quality of life and psychologic distress of recipients after adult living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT)-A study from mainland China

This cross-sectional study investigated potential factors impacting quality of life in 125 recipients after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was measured by using the Chinese version of Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36), and psychologic symptoms by using the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R). Clinical and demographic data were collected from the records of the Chinese Liver Transplant Registry and via questionnaire. A total of 102 recipients (81.6%) completed the questionnaires. All SF-36 domain scores (except the mental health score) were lower in the study than in the general population of Sichuan. The mental quality of life was significantly lower in female than in male subjects (P = .000). Regarding the role-physical (P = .016), social functioning (P = .000), and role-emotional (P = .004) domains, recipients >1 year after transplantation scored higher than those <1 year. Bodily pain scores were lower in recipients with prior acute liver failure than those with hepatic carcinoma or hepatic cirrhosis (P = .032). Social functioning was poorer in recipients with than in those without complications (P = .039). Mental component summary scale (MCS) scores and some of physical component summary scale (PCS) significantly correlated with symptom dimension scores of the SCL-90-R (P < .05). In conclusion, gender, time since transplant, etiology of disease, complications, occupation, and some psychologic symptoms were possible factors influencing postoperative HRQoL of LDLT recipients.

Transfusion requirements during cadaveric and living donor pediatric liver transplantation

Surgical techniques that have been used during liver transplantation (LT) together with patient's coagulation profile and institutional practices are reported to have an effect on transfusion requirements. The aim of this study is to evaluate the transfusion requirement in both cadaveric (CDLT, n = 22) and living donor (LDLT, n = 24) pediatric LT performed in our institution. Balanced general anesthesia was used for all patients. Transfusion requirements were met to maintain a hemoglobin concentration of 8-10 g/dL, platelet level >50 x 10(3)/mL, prothrombin time <20 s and hemodynamic course with observing heart rate, arterial and central venous blood pressures and hourly urine output. Blood loss was replaced by using whole blood. Both groups' perioperative total blood and fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) volumes transfused, fluid requirements and hemodynamic courses, standard coagulation profile and metabolic variables determined in time periods of operations, patients' preoperative characteristics, operative features and postoperative events were compared. The mean transfusion requirements were 37.1 +/- 33.4 and 74.8 +/- 90.8 mL/kg of whole blood (p = 0.059) and 34.5 +/- 24.9 and 51.5 +/- 59.7 mL/kg of FFP for CDLT and LDLT, respectively (p = 0.519). The mean ages and mean body weights of the CDLT patients were higher than LDLT patients (9.7 +/- 5.3 vs. 6.6 +/- 4.4 yr, p = 0.015 and 32.4 +/- 17.7 vs. 21.0 +/- 14.8 kg, p = 0.032, respectively) while the mean operation time (493 +/- 135 vs. 323 +/- 93 min, p = 0.0001) and PELD score (13.1 +/- 11.2 vs. 20.1 +/- 11.8, p = 0.036) were higher for LDLT. In the entire population, multiple regression analysis showed that age, body weight and operation time have a significant combined effect on blood consumption (r2= 0.29, p = 0.003) meanwhile operation time was found to be an effective single variable (p = 0.002). None of the single or combined variables was found to have a significant effect on FFP consumption (r2= 0.17, p = 0.63) and crystalloid use (r2= 0.19, p = 0.11). Hemodynamic courses of both groups were similar. The incidences of metabolic acidosis and hypothermia during the anhepatic periods were higher in the CDLT group (p < 0.05). However, transfusion requirement in the ICU were higher in LDLT group [6.9 +/- 2.2 (n = 6) vs. 18.6 +/- 19 (n = 11) mL/kg, p < 0.05] after LT. As a result of this study in a pediatric patient population, no statistical significance was found in whole blood transfusion and FFP requirements between CDLT and LDLT. Duration of the operation was the primary factor effecting transfusion volume showing the importance of continued small volume losses during uncomplicated LT in this small sized patient population. Transfusion need for pediatric LT should be individualized for each patient based on the intraoperative conditions including surgical and patient features.

Dextrose in the banked blood products does not seem to affect the blood glucose levels in patients undergoing liver transplantation

AIM: Hyperglycemia commonly seen in liver transplantation (LT) has often been attributed to the dextrose in the storage solution of blood transfusion products. The purpose of the study is to compare the changes of the blood glucose levels in transfused and non-transfused patients during LT.

METHODS: A retrospective study on 60 biliary pediatric patients and 16 adult patients undergoing LT was carried out. Transfused pediatric patients were included in Group I (GI), those not transfused in Group II (GII). Twelve adult patients were not given transfusion and assigned to Group III (GIII); whereas, four adult patients who received massive transfusion were assigned to Group IV (GIV). The blood glucose levels, volume of blood transfused, and the volume of crystalloid infused were recorded, compared and analyzed.

RESULTS: Results showed that the changes in blood glucose levels during LT for both non-transfused and minimally transfused pediatric groups and non-transfused and massively-transfused adult groups were almost the same.

CONCLUSION: We conclude that blood transfusion does not cause significant changes in the blood glucose levels in this study.

Perioperative normovolemic anemia is safe in pediatric living-donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Perioperative normovolemic anemia was applied in pediatric living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients with the aim of reducing the use of blood products and decreasing transfusion-related risk.

METHODS

The anemic state was allowed to occur by replacing intraoperative blood and transudate loss with colloid solutions and a discriminate use of packed red blood cells. When blood transfusion was required, the amount of blood replacement was calculated to target a hemoglobin level not higher than 8 to 9 g/dL.

RESULTS

Forty-eight pediatric patients underwent LDLT. Their mean hemoglobin and hematocrit levels were maintained below 9 g/dL and 27%, respectively, at the end of the operation, at the time of extubation, postoperative days 3, 10, and 20, and at the time of discharge. The mean ventilatory support time was 15.7 hr, and no patient required reintubation. Graft function normalized within the first week posttransplant in all patients, and there was no documented case of acute hepatic artery thrombosis. All the patients were discharged with acceptable liver function, and 98% of them remain alive to date.

CONCLUSION

Routine application of perioperative normovolemic anemia in pediatric LDLT has allowed the sparing use of blood products. Approximately half of our patients (42%) did not require intraoperative blood transfusion; 31% of the patients went home without receiving any blood products except 5% albumin. There were no adverse effects with this maneuver, and graft function was good in all patients.

Evaluation of living liver donors

Preoperative evaluation of donors for living-donor liver transplantation aims to select a suitable donor with optimal graft quality and to ensure donor safety. There are minor variations in the donor selection process among different centers, but the safety of the donor remains central to the entire process. The potential donors are evaluated in a stepwise manner including medical, physical, laboratory, psychosocial, and imaging assessment to disqualify unsuitable donors as early as possible in the evaluation process. The main goal of the imaging study is to provide an accurate picture of liver vascular anatomy and liver volume measurement for surgical guidance or for exclusion of unsuitable donors. All imaging studies can now be obtained using noninvasive modalities, thereby decreasing the risk associated with the donor evaluation process. This article describes the donor selection practice in our center including the details of the imaging evaluation.

Early graft function after pediatric liver transplantation: comparison between in situ split liver grafts and living-related liver grafts

BACKGROUND

The systematic application of living-related and cadaveric, in situ split-liver transplantation has helped to alleviate the critical shortage of suitable-sized, pediatric donors. Undoubtedly, both techniques are beneficial and advantageous; however, the superiority of either graft source has not been demonstrated directly. Because of the potential living-donor risks, we reserve the living donor as the last graft option for pediatric recipients awaiting liver transplantation. Inasmuch as no direct comparison between these two graft types has been performed, we sought to perform a comparative analysis of the functional outcomes of left lateral segmental grafts procured from these donor sources to determine whether differences do exist.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all liver transplants performed at a single institution between February 1984 and January 1999 was undertaken. Only pediatric (<18 years) recipients of left lateral segmental grafts procured from either living-related (LRD) or cadaveric, in situ split-liver (SLD) donors were included. A detailed analysis of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables was undertaken. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparison of variables between groups was undertaken using the t test of Wilcoxon rank sum test.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the preoperative variables between the 39 recipients of SLD grafts and 34 recipients of LRD grafts. The donors did differ significantly in mean age, ABO blood group matching, and preoperative liver function testing. Postoperative liver function testing revealed significant early differences in aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, prothrombin time, and alkaline phosphatase, with grafts from LRD performing better than those from SLD. SLD grafts also had significantly longer ischemia times and a higher incidence of graft loss owing to primary nonfunction and technical complications (9 vs. 2, P<0.05). However, six of these graft losses in the SLD group were because of technical or immunologic causes, which, theoretically, should not differ between the two groups. Furthermore, these graft losses did not negatively impact early patient survival as most patients were successfully rescued with retransplantation (30-day actuarial survival, 97.1% SLD vs. 94.1% LRD, P=0.745). In the surviving grafts, the early differences in liver function variables normalized.

CONCLUSIONS

Inherent differences in both donor sources exist and account for differences seen in preoperative and intraoperative variables. Segmental grafts from LRD clearly performed better in the first week after transplantation as demonstrated by lower liver function variables and less graft loss to primary nonfunction. However, the intermediate function (7-30 days) of both grafts did not differ, and the early graft losses did not translate into patient death. Although minimal living-donor morbidity was seen in this series, the use of this donor type still carries a finite risk. We therefore will continue to use SLD as the primary graft source for pediatric patients awaiting liver transplantation.

Surgical technique for right lobe adult living donor liver transplantation without venovenous bypass or portocaval shunting and with duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

To report the authors' experience with adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) without venovenous bypass and to describe modifications that will allow for a direct duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Adult living donor liver transplantation is being evaluated as a method to alleviate the organ shortage. Descriptions of the procedure have emphasized the use of venovenous bypass, portocaval decompression, and the mandatory use of a Roux-en-Y biliary enteric anastomosis. The authors describe a technique for ALDLT without venovenous bypass, portocaval decompression, or caval clamping in 11 recipients and describe the modifications to the procedure that may allow a duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in certain cases.

METHODS

Between March 1999 and March 2000, 11 ALDLTs were performed at the authors' institution. All procedures were performed without venovenous bypass, portocaval decompression, or caval clamping. After a modification to the procedure, five of the last six recipients underwent biliary reconstruction with a direct duct-to-duct anastomosis. Data regarding donor, recipient, and graft survival, complications, and graft function were collected.

RESULTS

Recipients comprised five women and six men, mean age 48 years. Donors comprised five women and six men, mean age 36.5 years. Donor to recipient relationships included sibling, spouse, son, and daughter. Indications for transplantation were hepatitis C, hepatitis C with hepatocellular carcinoma, primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, ethanol, and cryptogenic. No case required venovenous bypass or portocaval shunting. The right hepatic vein of the donor graft was anastomosed to the confluence of the left and middle hepatic veins in all cases. All donors are alive and well, with no adverse complications reported. Recipient and graft survival rates were 91% and 82%, respectively, for ALDLT versus 92% and 92% for recipients of cadaveric organs during the same time period. One recipient died of multiple organ failure and sepsis. Biliary reconstruction was performed by Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy in the six cases. In five of the last six recipients, direct duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction with a T tube was used. No anastomotic leaks or strictures occurred in the patients undergoing duct-to-duct reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Adult living donor liver transplantation can be performed safely and may help alleviate the organ shortage. Neither venovenous bypass nor portocaval shunting is necessary to perform the procedure, and modifications to both the donor and recipient hepatectomy procedures may allow biliary reconstruction to be performed by a direct duct-to-duct anastomosis in selected cases.