Dynamic asymmetries in disparity convergence eye movements

Target Eccentricity and Form Influences Disparity Vergence Eye Movements Responses: A Temporal and Dynamic Analysis

This study sought to investigate whether stimulation to the fovea or the parafovea with different color combinations influenced the temporal and dynamic features of 4° disparity vergence step responses. Twelve unique types of stimuli were displayed within a haploscope presented along the participant's midsagittal plane. Vergence eye movement responses from fifteen naïve participants were recorded using video-based infrared eye tracking instrumentation. Latency and peak velocity from left and right eye movement responses were quantified. Results show that the type of stimulus projection (foveal versus parafoveal) significantly (p<0.001) influences the vergence response latency but did not impact peak velocity. Vergence responses to eccentric circles with 6° eccentricity targeting the parafovea resulted in a significantly faster response latency compared to vergence responses to a cross with 2° eccentricity stimuli targeting the fovea. Results have implications for the stimulus design of a variety of applications from virtual reality to vision therapy interventions.

Elucidation of the more myopic eye in anisometropia: the interplay of laterality, ocular dominance, and anisometropic magnitude

This study reveals how, in a myopic anisometrope, the odds of an eye being more myopic are related to laterality, ocular dominance, and magnitude of anisometropia. In 193 subjects, objective refraction was performed with cycloplegia. Sighting, motor, and sensory dominance were determined with the hole-in-the-card test, convergence near-point test, continuous flashing technique, respectively. Multiple logistic regression was used for probability analysis. Seventy percent of the subjects had a right eye that was more myopic, while 30% of them had a more myopic left eye. When the right eye was the sensory dominant eye, the probability of the right eye being more myopic increased to 80% if the anisometropia was less than 3.0 D, and decreased below 70% if anisometropia was beyond 3.0 D. When the left eye was the sensory dominant eye, the probability of the left eye being more myopic increased to above 40% if the anisometropia was less than 4.0 D and decreased below 30% if the anisometropia was beyond 4.0 D. Therefore, between the two eyes of anisometropes, laterality tilts the chance of being more myopic to the right. Being the sensory dominant eye increases an eye’s probability of being more myopic by another 10% if the magnitude of anisometropia is moderate.

Disparity vergence responses before versus after repetitive vergence therapy in binocularly normal controls

This study sought to determine whether significant changes would be observed between vergence eye movements before and after 12 hr of repetitive vergence therapy (1 hr per day on different days) in subjects with normal binocular vision compared to controls. Disparity vergence responses from 23 subjects were studied. An assessment protocol that minimized the influence of the near dissociated phoria on the disparity vergence system was designed. The following parameters were quantified for the responses: latency, time to peak velocity, settling time, peak velocity, and accuracy (difference between the response and stimulus amplitudes). The following outcomes were observed when comparing the results after vergence therapy to the baseline measurements: (a) near point of convergence and near dissociated phoria did not significantly change (p > 0.15); (b) latency, time to peak velocity, and settling time significantly decreased (p ≤ 0.01); and (c) accuracy significantly improved (p < 0.01). Results support that vergence peak velocity is dependent on the subject's near dissociated phoria. The accuracy and temporal properties of vergence eye movement responses from subjects with normal binocular vision can be improved after vergence therapy. These methods can be utilized within future studies to quantitatively assess vergence therapy techniques for patients with binocular dysfunction.

Association between Ocular Sensory Dominance and Refractive Error Asymmetry

Purpose

To investigate the association between ocular sensory dominance and interocular refractive error difference (IRED).

Methods

A total of 219 subjects were recruited. The refractive errors were determined by objective refraction with a fixation target located 6 meters away. 176 subjects were myopic, with 83 being anisometropic (IRED ≥ 0.75 D). 43 subjects were hyperopic, with 22 being anisometropic. Sensory dominance was measured with a continuous flashing technique with the tested eye viewing a Gabor increasing in contrast and the fellow eye viewing a Mondrian noise decreasing in contrast. The log ratio of Mondrian to Gabor’s contrasts was recorded when a subject just detected the tilting direction of the Gabor during each trial. T-test was used to compare the 50 values collected from each eye, and the t-value was used as a subject’s ocular dominance index (ODI) to quantify the degree of ocular dominance. A subject with ODI ≥ 2 (p < 0.05) had clear dominance and the eye with larger mean ratio was the dominant one. Otherwise, a subject had an unclear dominance.

Results

The anisometropic subjects had stronger ocular dominance in comparison to non-anisometropic subjects (rank-sum test, p < 0.01 for both myopic and hyperopic subjects). In anisometropic subjects with clear dominance, the amplitude of the anisometropia was correlated with ODI values (R = 0.42, p < 0.01 in myopic anisometropic subjects; R = 0.62, p < 0.01 in hyperopic anisometropic subjects). Moreover, the dominant eyes were more myopic in myopic anisometropic subjects (sign-test, p < 0.05) and less hyperopic in hyperopic anisometropic subjects (sign-test, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The degree of ocular sensory dominance is associated with interocular refractive error difference.

Effect of artificial scotomas on open-loop disparity vergence eye movements

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of an artificial scotoma on open-loop disparity vergence responses (DVRs) and vergence control mechanisms, we examined open-loop DVRs to disparity stimuli using monocular artificial scotomas in normal subjects.

METHODS

Using a mirror haploscope with two computer monitors, we delivered disparity stimuli on a pair of random dot patterns subtending 40 by 30 degrees at 47 cm from each eye. The scotomas were black circles located in the center of a random dot pattern for the left eye. Eye movements of both eyes were recorded with a magnetic search coil system.

RESULTS

We first found that the amplitudes of DVRs were gradually decreased and the latency of DVRs was moderately increased as the size of the scotomas was increased. Second, monocular responses from each eye were symmetrical although the stimuli to each eye were asymmetrical.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that the monocular eye movements in disparity vergence are controlled by a binocular central mechanism, not driven separately by monocular inputs in the open-loop window.

Changes in perceived egocentric direction during symmetric vergence

The Wells-Hering's laws of perceived egocentric visual direction (EVD) assume that information about eye position includes equal contributions from both eyes. An implication of this assumption is that only versional eye movements should lead to a change in perceived EVD. Previously, we showed that a differential weighting of eye-position information occurs in some individuals during asymmetric vergence. To extend this finding, we determined here whether a differential weighting of eye-position information occurs also during symmetric vergence eye movements. Open-loop pointing responses to a bright target were obtained in five subjects to estimate the contribution of each eye's position information to perceived EVD during symmetric vergence demands that ranged from 6 prism diopters base in to 18 prism diopters base out. In all five subjects, the slopes of the lines fit to the pointing responses were in the direction that was predicted from an unequal weighting of eye-position information. We conclude that symmetric vergence movements can result in a change in perceived visual direction, contrary to an assumption of the Wells-Hering's laws.

Sustained fixation induced changes in phoria and convergence peak velocity

PURPOSE

This study sought to investigate the influence of phoria adaptation on convergence peak velocity from responses located at different initial vergence positions.

METHODS

Symmetrical 4° convergence step responses and near dissociated phoria (measured at 40 cm from the subject's midline) were recorded from six subjects with normal binocular vision using an infrared limbus tracking system with a haploscope. Two different sustained fixations (1° and 16° convergent rotation along the subject's midline) were used to study whether phoria had an influence on the peak velocity of convergence responses located at two initial vergence positions (1° or 'far' steps and 12° or 'near' steps).

RESULTS

Phoria was significantly adapted after a sustained fixation task at near (16°) and far (1°) (p<0.002). A repeated measures ANOVA showed that convergence far steps were significantly faster than the near steps (p<0.03). When comparing convergence steps with the same initial vergence position, steps measured after near phoria adaptation were faster than responses after far adaptation (p<0.02). A regression analysis demonstrated that the change in phoria and the change in convergence peak velocity were significantly correlated for the far convergence steps (r = 0.97, p = 0.001). A weaker correlation was observed for the near convergence steps (r = 0.59, p = 0.20).

CONCLUSION

As a result of sustained fixation, phoria was adapted and the peak velocity of the near and far convergence steps was modified. This study has clinical considerations since prisms, which evoke phoria adaptation, can be prescribed to help alleviate visual discomfort. Future investigations should include a systematic study of how prisms may influence convergence and divergence eye movements for those prescribed with prisms within their spectacles.

Vergence transient component: an index to oculomotor learning modification

The brain has a dynamic ability to change or adapt which is imperative for survival of a species. Research has shown that the dynamics of disparity vergence eye movements, the inward (convergence) or outward (divergence) turning of the eyes, are malleable and depend to some extent on the amplitude of preceding stimuli. Disparity convergence is composed of two components. The transient component is open loop and accounts for the system's speed; whereas the sustained component is assumed to be feedback controlled allowing the system to be very accurate. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the modification of convergence eye movements was a function of the magnitude of the subject's transient component. An experimental session consisted of three phases: baseline, modification, and recovery. The baseline and recovery phases used only 4 degrees step test stimuli. The modification phase consisted of a 4 degrees test randomly intermixed with a larger conditioning double step or step ramp stimulus presented in a 1:5 ratio. Eight subjects participated. Independent component analysis was used to decompose the vergence responses into the transient and sustained components. Results show the magnitude of the transient component is an indicator for the amount of dynamic change observed during the modification phase, R = 0.88.

Divergence dynamic modification as a function of initial position

The ability to change or adapt is critical in the survival of a species. Research has shown that the dynamics of disparity vergence eye movements, the inward (convergence) or outward (divergence) turning of the eyes, are malleable and depend to some extent on the amplitude of preceding stimuli. Divergence eye movements are dependent on initial stimulus position where responses that occur closer to the subject are faster compared to responses that occur farther from the subject. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the modification of divergence eye movements was also a function of initial stimulus position. An experimental trial consisted of three phases: baseline, modification, and recovery. The baseline and recovery phases used only 4 degrees test stimuli. The modification phase consisted of a 4 degrees test randomly intermixed with an 8 degrees step presented in a 1:5 ratio. Two experiments were conducted, one with an initial vergence angle of 8 degrees (far) and the other with an initial position of 20 degrees or 18 degrees (near). Two subjects participated. The dynamic characteristics of the responses to test stimuli were quantified by measuring the magnitude of the peak velocity. Preliminary results suggest the amount of change in peak velocity was greater when the stimuli were closer to the subject. Data suggest that the peak velocity of divergence observed during baseline conditions maybe correlated to the ability to change the dynamics of the disparity vergence system.

Dry dissection of disparity divergence eye movements using independent component analysis

Dry dissection, a concept developed by Lawrence Stark, includes a variety of techniques designed to isolate internal neural control components by using cleverly designed stimulus or measurement protocols. As envisioned by Stark, the concept applies only to motor systems that have multiple stimulus inputs and/or response behaviors. A new application of independent component analysis (ICA) can be used to extend the dry dissection concept to identify motor components from a single, isolated response. It is only necessary that multiple responses can be obtained to the same stimulus. This "ensemble ICA" technique is well suited to analyze various eye movement behaviors as even isolated motor systems often include multiple control processes. Here we apply ensemble ICA to vergence eye movements: the inward (convergence) or outward (divergence) turning of the eyes that allows us to view images at various distances. Previous studies concerning the dynamics of convergence and divergence eye movements have produced varied, sometimes contradictory, results: most studies report that convergence is considerably faster than divergence, but opposite results have also been reported. Experimental results have shown that the dynamics of divergence movements depend on the initial vergence position while those of convergence do not: divergence eye movements in response to targets initially near to the subject can attain peak velocities twice that of those driven by more distant targets. To determine the underlying cause of this behavior, ensemble ICA was applied to divergence responses. Results show that both convergence and divergence contain a sustained (step-like) and a transient (pulse-like) control component, but the amplitude of the transient component in divergence is dependent on initial stimulus position.

Dynamic assessment of disparity vergence ramps

Previous work has shown that the disparity vergence eye movement system responds to inward (i.e., convergent) ramp stimuli with both smooth and step-like behavior depending on target velocity. The responses to diverging ramp stimuli have not been previously studied, but convergence and divergence responses to other stimuli often show different behaviors. Converging and diverging 6 degrees/s ramps were presented to four subjects over a stimulus range of 2 degrees-20 degrees. Step-like behavior was seen in both convergence and divergence responses, but the dynamics was different. For divergent ramps, the peak velocity of each step-like movement decreased as the stimulus moved away from the subject, but no such trend was observed for convergence. The step-like behavior seen in divergence supports the hypothesis that the transient component is active in disparity divergence similar to the transient component proposed for convergent movements. However, the transient component in divergence may be dependent on stimulus position which is not the case for convergence.

Divergence eye movements are dependent on initial stimulus position

Previous studies on the speed and latency of convergence and divergence eye movements have produced varied, sometimes contradictory, results. Four subjects were studied and tracked 4 degrees disparity step changes for convergence and divergence at different initial target positions. Here we report that the dynamics of divergence movements not only differ from convergence movement, but depend on the initial vergence position. Velocities of divergence eye movements in response to targets that were initially near to the subject were approximately twice that of responses to initially distant targets and also exhibited shorter temporal properties. Hence, while convergence responses are fairly similar irrespective of the initial position, divergence dynamic and temporal properties are dependent on the initial stimulus position. It is speculated that the differences observed in divergence may be the result of nonlinear properties of the extraocular muscles or a difference in the underlying neural controller potentially a difference in the magnitude of the fusion initiating component of divergence.

Primate memory saccade amplitude after intervened motion depends on target distance

To keep a stable internal representation of the visual world as our eyes, head, and body move around, humans and monkeys must continuously adjust neural maps of visual space using extraretinal sensory or motor cues. When such movements include translation, the amount of body displacement must be weighted differently in the updating of far versus near targets. Using a memory-saccade task, we have investigated whether nonhuman primates can benefit from this geometry when passively moved sideways. We report that monkeys made appropriate memory saccades, taking into account not only the amplitude and nature (rotation vs. translation) of the movement, but also the distance of the memorized target: i.e., the amplitude of memory saccades was larger for near versus far targets. The scaling by viewing distance, however, was less than geometrically required, such that memory saccades consistently undershot near targets. Such a less-than-ideal scaling of memory saccades is reminiscent of the viewing distance-dependent properties of the vestibuloocular reflex. We propose that a similar viewing distance-dependent vestibular signal is used as an extraretinal compensation for the visuomotor consequences of the geometry of motion parallax by scaling both memory saccades and reflexive eye movements during motion through space.

Static and dynamic properties of vergence-induced reduction of ocular counter-roll in near vision

We have examined the characteristics of vergence-induced reduction of ocular counter-roll in near vision. Monkeys were trained to make convergent and divergent refixations with the head and body either upright or in various roll orientations. During near viewing requiring 17 degrees horizontal vergence, we found that static binocular torsion was suppressed by about 68% (averaged over both eyes, two monkeys and both near target locations). This result is in accordance with a previous study in which binocular torsion was quantified based on the displacement planes of eye positions in far and near viewing. Latency and duration of the change in torsional eye position depended (for each eye differently) on body roll and the depth plane of fixation. For instance, during convergent refixations in left-ear-down orientations, the latencies of the left eye were smaller and the durations were longer than those of the right eye. However, both eyes reached their final positions required to fixate the second visual target at roughly the same time. The different dynamics of the two eyes is explained by the fact that each eye rotated temporally when the eyes converged, a pattern named binocular extension of Listing's law. Coming from or aiming at a common torsional value (normal ocular counter-roll) in convergent or divergent refixations, the required torsion differs in the two eyes. The brain compensates for these differences by adjusting the dynamics of each eye's movement.

Disparity vergence double responses processed by internal error

Disparity vergence eye movements occasionally exhibit two high-velocity components to a single step stimulus (Alvarez, T. L., Semmlow, J. L. & Yuan, W. (1998). Journal of Neurophysiology, 79, 37-44). This research investigates the neural strategy used to trigger the second component of double high-velocity vergence eye movements. Vergence doubles evoked by an experimental protocol that induces post-movement visual error were compared to doubles that occur normally. The second component of a visually evoked response double occurred later, and with slower dynamics, than that of a naturally occurring double. These differences in timing and dynamics indicate that natural double responses are mediated, at least in part, by a mechanism other than visual feedback. The faster dynamics and timing of natural doubles suggest that an internal monitoring process triggers these movements.