Persistent centrilobular necroses in hepatic allografts

Postinfantile Giant Cell Hepatitis in Native and Allograft Livers: A Multi-Institutional Clinicopathologic Study of 70 Cases

Postinfantile giant cell hepatitis (PIGCH) is a rare hepatitis pattern in adults with variable etiologies and clinical outcomes. We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study to define the clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with PIGCH. A total of 70 PIGCH cases were identified and reviewed for pathological features, including fibrosis, cholestasis, inflammation, steatosis, necrosis, and apoptosis, as well as the distribution of giant cells and the maximum number of giant cells per high-power field. Demographic and clinical data, including age, sex, laboratory results, etiologies, and follow-up results, were recorded. Among the 70 cases, 40% (28/70) were associated with autoimmune liver diseases, followed by 9 (13%) with unknown etiology, 8 (11%) with viral infection, 5 (7%) with medications, 5 with combined etiologies, and 4 (6%) with malignancies (mostly chronic lymphocytic leukemia). Notably, another 16% were de novo PIGCH in liver allografts, most of which occurred after a rejection event. During follow-up, 26 (37%) patients died of the disease and 44 (63%) were alive. Deceased patients were characterized by older age (mean age, 54.9 vs 45.5 years; P = .02), higher alkaline phosphatase level (mean value, 253.3U/L vs 166.3 U/L; P = .03), higher fibrosis stage (stage 3-4 vs stage 0-2, 57.7% vs 29.6%; P = .03), being more likely to have de novo PIGCH after transplantation (23.1% vs 11.4%; P = .04), and being less likely to have primary autoimmune liver disease etiology (26.9% vs 47.7%; P = .04). These results indicate that PIGCH is a rare pattern of liver injury associated with different etiologies and variable clinical outcomes. Autoimmune liver disease with PIGCH is associated with better survival, whereas de novo PIGCH in allografts is associated with poorer survival. Older age, higher alkaline phosphatase level, and advanced fibrosis are adverse prognostic factors.

Clinicopathological features and outcomes of parenchymal rejection in liver transplant biopsies

AIMS

The aim of this study was to perform a comprehensive retrospective analysis of liver transplant biopsies with parenchymal rejection (PR) at our institution, including histological features, laboratory values and follow-up biopsies, and to compare PR with portal-based acute cellular rejection (ACR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Biopsies from 173 patients were evaluated (retrospective database search 1990-2017), including 49 isolated PR, 35 PR with portal ACR (PR/ACR), 34 mild ACR and 52 moderate ACR cases. The rise and fall of serum liver enzymes was calculated as a measure of acute liver injury and response to immunotherapy, respectively. Isolated PR was associated with delayed-onset acute rejection (P < 0.001), as well as younger age (P = 0.004), and showed a similar rise in liver enzymes to mild ACR. PR/ACR and moderate ACR showed the highest elevations in transaminases (P < 0.05). Isolated PR on an initial biopsy was associated with recurrent episodes of PR (P = 0.01), chronic ductopaenic rejection (P = 0.002) and chronic vascular rejection (P = 0.017). Immunohistochemistry for C4d was performed, and strong C4d staining of venules was only detected in one severe isolated PR case (one of three, 33%) and one moderate ACR case (one of 20, 5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated PR represents a form of late acute rejection with distinct clinical and histological features. There is value in reporting PR in liver transplant biopsies to identify patients at higher risk of developing recurrent PR and chronic rejection. Standardisation of terminology and histological criteria of PR can help in uniform reporting and ensure appropriate management.

Centrilobular necrosis as a manifestation of venous outflow block in pediatric malnourished liver transplant recipients--case reports

CLN is a frequent histological finding in biopsies after pediatric: LT, and its pathogenesis has not yet been fully clarified and has different causes. Among the vascular causes, VOB is sometimes difficult to diagnose, especially when technical variants such as split-liver, reduced-liver, or living-related LT are utilized. Three liver-transplanted malnourished children (ages 12, 20, and 28 months) developed altered LFTs and post-operative ascites with right pleural effusion (two cases) and jaundice (one case). Doppler ultrasound examinations were normal and liver biopsies showed CLN interpreted as severe ACR. There were no responses to the medical treatment. Additional investigation with CT angiography suggested obstructed hepatic vein drainage, which was confirmed by interventional radiology and angioplasty of the anastomosis between the hepatic vein and the inferior vena cava, with clinical and histological resolution. It is concluded that in malnourished children undergoing LT with technical variations, in which the occurrence of severe ACR is usually less common because of the severity of the patient condition, the finding of CLN should raise the possibility of VOB, so that excessive immunosuppression and its consequences can be avoided.

Diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation

Autoimmune hepatitis can recur or appear de novo after liver transplantation, and it can result in hepatic fibrosis, graft loss, and re-transplantation. The goals of this review are to describe the prevalence, manifestations, putative pathogenic mechanisms, outcomes, and management of these occurrences. Autoimmune hepatitis recurs in 8-12 % of transplanted patients at 1 year and 36-68 % at 5 years. Recurrence may be asymptomatic and detected only by surveillance liver test abnormalities or protocol liver tissue examination. Autoantibodies that characterized the original disease, hypergammaglobulinemia, increased serum immunoglobulin G level, and histological findings of interface hepatitis, lymphoplasmacytic infiltration, perivenular hepatocyte necrosis, pseudo-rosetting, and acidophil bodies typify recurrence. Premature corticosteroid withdrawal and pre-transplant severity of the original disease are possible risk factors. De novo autoimmune hepatitis occurs in 1-7 % of patients 0.1-9 years after transplantation, especially in children. The appearance of autoantibodies may herald its emergence, and antibodies to glutathione-S-transferase T1 have been predictive of the disease. Recurrent disease may reflect recruitment of residual memory T lymphocytes and host-specific genetic predispositions, whereas de novo disease may reflect an allo-antigenic immune response and molecular mimicries that override self-tolerance. Treatment should be appropriate for autoimmune hepatitis and not based on anti-rejection drugs. Corticosteroid therapy alone or combined with azathioprine is the essential treatment. The substitution of mycophenolate mofetil for azathioprine and switch of the calcineurin inhibitor or its replacement with rapamycin have also been used for refractory disease. Re-transplantation has been necessary in 8-23 %.

Current views on rejection pathology in liver transplantation

Histological assessments continue to play an important role in the diagnosis and management of liver allograft rejection. The changes occurring in acute and chronic rejection are well recognized and liver biopsy remains the 'gold standard' for diagnosing these two conditions. Recent interest has focused on the diagnosis of late cellular rejection, which may have different histological appearances to early acute rejection and instead has features that overlap with so-called 'de novo autoimmune hepatitis' and 'idiopathic post-transplant chronic hepatitis'. There is increasing evidence to suggest that 'central perivenulitis' may be an important manifestation of late rejection, although other causes of centrilobular necro-inflammation need to be considered in the differential diagnosis. There are also important areas of overlap between rejection and recurrent hepatitis C infection and the distinction between these two conditions continues to be a problem in the assessment of liver allograft biopsies. Studies using immunohistochemical staining for C4d as a marker for antibody-mediated damage have found evidence of C4d deposition in liver allograft rejection, but the functional significance of these observations is currently uncertain. This review will focus on these difficult and controversial areas in the pathology of rejection, documenting what is currently known and identifying areas where further clarification is required.

Significance of central perivenulitis in pediatric liver transplantation

Central perivenulitis (CP) encompasses dropout of zone 3 hepatocytes, red blood cell extravasation, and perivenular mononuclear inflammation. In the liver transplant setting, CP can occur in isolation or it can occur in association with portal-based disease such as acute cellular rejection (PB-ACR). Some CP is also thought to be a manifestation of chronic rejection, particularly when accompanied by zone 3 fibrosis. Prior studies of CP in pediatric liver allografts have been hampered by lack of protocol biopsies and low rates of histologic follow-up. We studied 62 consecutive liver allografts from 55 pediatric patients (age: < or =18 y) who underwent transplant from the years 1995 to 2007. Forty-nine allografts (79%) had > or =1 year of histologic follow-up, 32 (52%) > or =3 years, and 24 (39%) > or =5 years. We reviewed a total of 445 allograft biopsies (mean: 7.2 per allograft) obtained at 2 days to 11 years; 213 (48%) of these were protocol biopsies. Seven explanted livers that were removed during the course of retransplantation for graft failure in this group were also reviewed. All specimens were scored for the following features: (1) CP (mild, moderate, and severe), (2) portal ACR (mild, moderate, and severe), (3) zone 3 fibrosis (mild=perivenular or severe=bridging), and (4) ductopenia. CP was present in 120 (27%) of 445 biopsies, including 73 with CP+PB-ACR, 16 with CP within 1 month of PB-ACR, 27 with isolated CP, 3 with CP+de-novo autoimmune hepatitis, and 1 with CP+Epstein-Barr virus infection. Overall, CP was observed on at least 1 occasion in 41 (66%) allografts. It was not associated with any specific liver function test abnormality or pattern of liver function test abnormalities, it was not associated with vascular compromise as judged by Doppler ultrasound examinations, and it was not related to type of immunosuppression. CP overall was equally prevalent in the early (< or =3 mo) and late (>3 mo) post-transplant periods, but isolated CP increased in the late period. On follow-up, 6 (15%) of 41 allografts with CP developed ductopenic chronic rejection (4 requiring retransplantation) and 10 (25%) developed zone 3-based fibrosis without ductopenia (2 severe, 8 mild). In contrast, none of the 21 allografts without CP developed chronic rejection (P=0.09) and none had zone 3-based fibrosis on their last biopsy (P<0.001). All patients who developed ductopenia had 1 or more episodes of CP+PB-ACR. In contrast, isolated CP [seen in 17 (27%) allografts on at least 1 occasion] was associated with zone 3-based fibrosis in 50%, but did not lead to ductopenic chronic rejection. These results underscore the high frequency of CP in pediatric liver transplantation, occurring in 27% of all allograft biopsies and 66% of allografts overall. CP is most common in conjunction with portal ACR, where it carries a significant risk for the development of zone 3 fibrosis and a trend toward the development of ductopenic chronic rejection.

The prevalence and natural history of untreated isolated central perivenulitis in adult allograft livers

Central perivenulitis (CP) in the allograft liver can be associated with portal-based acute cellular rejection and autoimmune hepatitis or can occur in isolation (isolated CP). Although several studies have demonstrated the significance of CP, the prevalence and natural history of untreated isolated CP have not been well studied. We examined 100 adult allograft liver recipients who had long-term follow-up, had routine protocol biopsies, and received no treatment for isolated CP. Isolated CP was identified in 28 (28%) patients. It occurred late at a mean of 658 days. Interestingly, patients with late isolated CP (defined as >3 months posttransplant) usually manifested only mildly to modestly elevated liver function tests. However, late isolated CP was associated with prior and subsequent allograft complications. Nearly all (94%) cases of late isolated CP occurred in patients who had early episodes of CP and/or acute cellular rejection. Of 13 patients who developed adverse outcomes in their allografts (zone 3 fibrosis in 10, de novo autoimmune hepatitis in 3, and ductopenia in 3), all experienced episodes of prior CP, and 12 (92%) had late CP; 1 patient required retransplant for chronic rejection, but all were alive within the last year. In summary, "transplant-associated" isolated CP occurs in 28% of adult patients, early CP is predictive of late CP, and late CP (often present as isolated CP) is associated with long-term liver injury in some patients.

Liver biopsy interpretation for causes of late liver allograft dysfunction

Evaluation of needle biopsies and extensive clinicopathological correlation play an important role in the determination of liver allograft dysfunction occurring more than 1 year after transplantation. Interpretation of these biopsies can be quite difficult because of the high incidence of recurrent diseases that show histopathological, clinical, and serological features that overlap with each other and with rejection. Also, more than one insult can contribute to allograft injury. In an attempt to enable centers to compare and pool results, improve therapy, and better understand pathophysiological disease mechanisms, the Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology herein proposes a set of consensus criteria for the most common and problematic causes of late liver allograft dysfunction, including late-onset acute and chronic rejection, recurrent and new-onset viral and autoimmune hepatitis, biliary strictures, and recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. A discussion of differential diagnosis is also presented.

Centrilobular necrosis in autoimmune hepatitis: a histological feature associated with acute clinical presentation

AIMS

The characteristic histological feature of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is interface hepatitis with predominant portal lymphoplasmacytic necroinflammatory infiltration. Centrilobular necrosis (CN), reminiscent of toxic or circulatory liver injury, has been reported in AIH. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of CN in patients with AIH and its correlation with laboratory and clinical data.

METHODS

Liver biopsies were obtained from 114 patients (90 women, 24 men, mean (SD) age 45.4 (19.4) years) with AIH and were evaluated under code by a single pathologist according to the modified Knodell score.

RESULTS

CN was found in 20 (17.5%) patients with virtually unaffected portal areas in four cases. Patients with AIH with CN had a higher total hepatic activity index (median (range) 11 (6 to 15) v 5 (2 to 10)) and presented less frequently with cirrhosis (10% v 38%). Patients with CN had a higher frequency of acute onset (87% v 32%), higher bilirubin (median (range) 12.0 (0.43 to 40.0) v 1.9 (0.36 to 46)) and higher ALT levels (median (range) 25.6 (2.7 to 63.9) v 7.2 (0.7 to 62.6)), than did patients with AIH without centrizonal injury.

CONCLUSION

CN with sparing of the portal areas represents a rare histological pattern in AIH. CN is associated with an acute clinical presentation and might reflect an early lesion preceding portal involvement. Recognition of this particular histological appearance enables early diagnosis of AIH and a timely initiation of immunosuppressive therapy.

Centrilobular necrosis after orthotopic liver transplantation: association with acute cellular rejection and impact on outcome

Several studies have linked centrilobular necrosis (CN) to acute cellular rejection (ACR) following liver transplantation. However, it may be difficult to establish the diagnosis of ACR when the classic portal features are absent. The aim of the present study was to identify specific features that would help to recognize ACR in biopsies with CN. One hundred and forty liver biopsies with CN were identified from 97 patients who underwent liver transplantation. The following histopathologic features were assessed: CN, steatosis, lobular inflammation, cholestasis, endothelialitis, and fibrosis. CN was graded semiquantitatively. A number of clinical and biochemical parameters were also recorded. Biopsies with CN were assessed for the presence or absence of ACR and divided into two groups accordingly. The associations of the biochemical, pathologic, and clinical features with ACR were assessed using a multivariate logistic regression model. The outcomes of patients with and without rejection were compared using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Seventy-four biopsies (52.9%) showed evidence of ACR, and 52 patients (53.6%) had evidence of ACR at the first biopsy with CN. The multivariate analysis showed the presence of cholestasis, lobular inflammation, the ALT level, and time since liver transplantation to be independent predictors of the presence of ACR in biopsies with CN. Patients with ACR on their first biopsy with CN were significantly more likely to experience graft loss compared with patients without ACR. In conclusion, the presence of cholestasis and lobular inflammation on biopsies with CN appeared helpful in predicting its association with ACR.

Acute hepatic allograft rejection: a comparison of patients with and without centrilobular alterations during first rejection episode

The histologic diagnosis of acute hepatic allograft rejection is usually based upon the identification of characteristic portal tract features. In addition to these, centrilobular alterations such as central vein endothelialitis, zone 3 inflammation, and hepatocyte necrosis may also be seen during episodes of acute rejection. The purpose of this study was to identify any differences in the subsequent clinical course of patients with and without centrilobular alterations during their first biopsy-proven episode of acute rejection. Acute rejection was diagnosed at least once in 35 liver recipients who had undergone allograft biopsy. Of these, 15 (43%) had centrilobular alterations in their first posttransplant biopsy. These 15 patients developed ductopenia (60% vs. 30%) and subsequent episodes of acute rejection (53% vs. 25%) more often than did the 20 patients who lacked centrilobular alterations in their first posttransplant biopsy. Time to first episode of acute rejection and rates of subsequent recurrent hepatitis and death were similar between the 2 groups. Patients with centrilobular alterations during a first episode of acute rejection are more likely to have subsequent episodes of acute rejection and to develop features of chronic rejection than are patients without these changes. These patients may benefit from more vigilant clinical follow-up and/or higher levels of immunosuppression.

Can early liver biopsies predict long-term outcome of the graft?

BACKGROUND

Chronic rejection (CR) in liver allografts show a rapid onset and progressive course, leading to graft failure within the first year after transplantation. Most cases are preceded by episodes of acute cellular rejection (AR), but histological features predictive for the transition toward CR are not well documented.

METHOD

We assessed the predictive value of centrilobular necrosis, central vein endothelialitis (CVE), central vein fibrosis, and lobular inflammation in the development of CR. One-week and one-month biopsy specimens of 12 patients with CR were compared with those of a control group consisting of 17 patients, who experienced AR without developing CR. The progress of the histological changes was further evaluated in follow-up biopsy specimens of the CR group taken at 2 months and beyond 3 months after transplantation.

RESULT

Centrilobular necrosis, CVE, central vein fibrosis, and lobular inflammation were common features in both groups at 1 week. At 1 month, the incidence declined in the control group. The CR group showed an increased incidence and persistence of these features in the follow-up specimens. The incidence and median grade of severity of CVE was significantly higher in the CR group (p=0.04, and P<0.001). The severity of portal and lobular inflammation was also more pronounced in the CR group (P+0.01 and 0.069). Conversely, in the control group the incidence of the lobular features decreased and the severity of CVE declined significantly (P=0.03).

CONCLUSION

The shift from a predominantly portal-based process toward lobular graft damage represents the early transition of AR to CR, for which a modification of immunosuppression might be necessary to prevent graft loss.

Histologic and biochemical changes during the evolution of chronic rejection of liver allografts

Criteria for histologic diagnosis of chronic rejection (CR) are based on changes seen late in the disease process that are likely to be irreversible and unresponsive to treatment. Changes occurring during the evolution of CR are less clearly defined. The serial biopsy specimens, failed allografts, and biochemical profiles of 28 patients who underwent retransplantation for CR were examined with the aim of identifying histologic and biochemical features that were present during the early stages of CR. For each case, a point of acute deterioration in liver function tests (LFTs) was identified ("start time" [ST]) that subsequently progressed to graft failure. Biopsy specimens before, at the time of ("start biopsy" [SB]), and after the ST were assessed histologically, and findings were correlated with the biochemical changes. CR resulted from acute rejection (AR) that did not resolve. Centrilobular necroinflammation (CLNI) associated with an elevated aspartate transaminase (AST) level and portal tract features of AR were present at the start. Portal AR features resolved, CLNI persisted, AST level remained elevated, and bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase levels progressively increased throughout the evolution of CR. Portal tracts also showed a loss of small arterial and bile duct branches, with arterial loss occurring early and bile duct loss as a later progressive lesion. Foam cell arteriopathy was rarely seen in needle biopsy specimens. In conclusion, findings from this study may help identify patients at risk of progressing to graft loss from CR at a stage when the disease process is potentially reversible and amenable to treatment.

Centrilobular histopathologic changes in liver transplant biopsies

We evaluated centrilobular histologic changes seen on post-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) biopsies to refine the pathologic diagnosis by systematic study of morphologic and clinical data with possible identification of prognostic criteria. A total of 110 biopsies with zone 3 pathology from 59 patients were reviewed and correlated with clinical findings. Within the first 6 months post-OLT (group I), 39 of 47 patients had combinations of centrilobular hepatocytic dropout, ballooning, and cholestasis on single or multiple biopsies attributed to perioperative ischemic/perfusion injury; 12 of 39 patients with all 3 features present had increased incidence of biliary complications and sepsis and decreased 1-year patient and graft survival; 17 of 39 patients with 2 of the 3 features had increased biliary complications but not decreased 1-year survival; and the remaining 8 of 47 patients had central venulitis associated with acute cellular rejection. After 6 months post-OLT (group II), 14 patients, including 2 from group I, had biopsies with centrilobular pathology; 8 of 14 had central venulitis related to rejection (acute, 4; chronic, 4), and fibrosis was seen in 8 (rejection, 6; cardiac problems, 2). In conclusion, combinations of centrilobular hepatocytic ballooning, dropout, and cholestasis are seen in association with reversible or irreversible ischemic/perfusion damage in the early post-OLT period. The presence of all 3 features is associated with a poor outcome. Central venulitis as a feature of acute/chronic rejection is seen at any time post-OLT and is not a predictor of poor graft/patient survival.

Centrilobular necrosis in children after combined liver and small bowel transplantation

BACKGROUND

Centrilobular necrosis is not an uncommon finding after isolated liver transplantation. In this study, we sought to describe hepatic centrilobular necrosis in children after combined liver and small bowel transplantation (LSBT), and to assess the predictive factors, possible causes, and prognosis.

METHODS

Six children aged 4 to 11 years, in whom liver biopsy showed centrilobular necrosis at least once, 3 weeks to 2 years after LSBT, were compared with nine children without this pathology. All six children experienced an acute complication in the few weeks preceding the finding of centrilobular necrosis. In addition, one child had an early arterial thrombosis and one, severe colitis 3 years after LSBT.

RESULTS

Centrilobular necrosis was associated with centrilobular swelling, dropout, endotheliitis, and inflammation. Fibrosis developed early and worsened on follow-up biopsy in three children. Portal symptoms of acute rejection were not constant, and there was no ductopenia. Biologic abnormalities were responsive to increased immunosuppression, including mycophenolate in four cases. However, follow-up biopsies showed persistent lesions in five patients, mildly inflammatory in four. Baseline immunosuppression had to be maintained at high levels. No viral infections, vascular compromise (except in one), and autoimmunity were found. We compared the two groups of children for initial diagnosis, age at transplantation, time receiving parenteral nutrition, ischemic time, presence of an associated transplanted colon, number of reoperations and infections, intestinal rejection, and immunosuppression, and found no differences.

CONCLUSIONS

This severe manifestation of chronic liver rejection occurred despite the heavy immunosuppression needed for LSBT. The previous acute clinical event could have triggered rejection by modifying the effective immunosuppression at the tissue level. Despite high baseline immunosuppression, histologic lesions persisted and significant fibrosis developed in half the children. We speculate that the lack of induction of tolerance in this particular setting of LSBT could be responsible for constant immune stimulation, thus chronic rejection. The optimal protocol of immunosuppression has yet to be defined to avoid this complication.

Arcuate and interlobular phlebitis in renal allografts

Intimal arteritis in the renal allograft has a well-documented adverse effect on graft outcome. In contrast, venulitis is currently considered an innocuous finding, based largely on observations of thin-walled intermediary venules. Arcuate and interlobular veins have not been studied specifically. These veins have well-developed muscular walls, and inflammation at this level (phlebitis) could significantly alter renal hemodynamics. We studied the clinicopathologic correlates of arcuate and interlobular phlebitis in 31 renal allograft biopsy specimens. Phlebitis was seen in conjunction with borderline changes suggestive of acute cellular rejection (13 cases), or acute rejection Banff grade 1A (7 cases), Banff grade 1B (6 cases), Banff grade 2A (4 cases), and Banff grade 2B (1 case). Clinical follow-up (average 323 +/- 460 days) showed no adverse effects of phlebitis as judged by temporal changes in serum creatinine and the grade of chronic allograft nephropathy in follow-up biopsies. Thus it appears that arcuate and interlobular phlebitis in allograft biopsy specimens does not add prognostic information beyond that provided by conventional Banff criteria. However, this lesion frequently coexists with changes suggestive or diagnostic of acute cellular rejection, and intimal arteritis may be seen concurrently in up to 16% of cases.

Are parenchymal changes in early post-transplant biopsies related to preservation-reperfusion injury or rejection?

BACKGROUND

The progression of parenchymal changes in liver allograft biopsies due to preservation-reperfusion injury (PRI) and their differentiation from rejection related changes is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to determine which changes in a 1-week posttransplant biopsy could be attributed to PRI and which to acute rejection.

METHODS

One week protocol liver transplant biopsies from patients with mild PRI (day 1 AST<400 IU/L) were compared with those from patients with severe PRI (day 1 AST>2000 IU/L). Parenchymal changes (cholestasis, ballooning, steatosis, necrosis) and rejection-related inflammatory features (portal tract inflammation, bile duct inflammation, portal vein endothelial inflammation, hepatic vein endothelial inflammation, and centrilobular inflammation) were blindly assessed semiquantitatively.

RESULTS

Fat, cholestasis, and hepatocyte ballooning were significantly worse in the severe PRI group, and these features showed no correlation with histological features related to acute rejection. Centrilobular hepatocyte necrosis correlated with hepatic venular endothelial inflammation and centrilobular inflammation but not with rejection related features in portal tracts or with PRI. These findings suggest that centrilobular necrosis is a manifestation of a rejection-related parenchymal injury and may involve different pathogenetic mechanisms to rejection-related features in portal tracts.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that in early posttransplant biopsies, fat, cholestasis, and ballooning can largely be attributed to PRI. By contrast, centrilobular hepatocyte loss should be suspected as a rejection related phenomenon, even if typical portal tract changes are not prominent, and augmentation of immunosuppression should be considered.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease of the liver: presentation as an acute hepatitis

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) of the liver usually presents as an indolent cholestatic disease in patients with skin, mouth, and eye involvement. We observed 14 patients in whom chronic GVHD of the liver presented with marked elevations of serum aminotransferases, clinically resembling acute viral hepatitis. Onset of liver dysfunction was at 294 days (range, 74-747 days) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and coincided with a recent cessation or taper of immunosuppressive drugs. Median peak serum alanine transaminase (ALT) was 1,640 U/L (698-2,565 U/L), and median bilirubin was 12.3 mg/dL (0.9-55.9 mg/dL). All biopsies showed characteristic features of GVHD with damaged and degenerative small bile ducts. Other features included a marked lobular hepatitis, moderate to marked amounts of hepatocyte unrest, sinusoidal inflammation with perivenular necroinflammatory foci, and many acidophilic bodies scattered throughout the lobule. When high-dose immunosuppressive therapy was instituted soon after presentation, progressive improvement and eventual normalization of liver enzymes and bilirubin levels were observed. However, in cases in which the diagnosis was not made and therapy was delayed, a progressive cholestatic picture emerged with histologic evidence of loss of small bile ducts and portal fibrosis. We conclude that a distinct syndrome of chronic liver GVHD presenting as an acute hepatitis can be recognized in a patient at risk who is receiving no, or minimal, immunosuppressive medications. Liver biopsy is necessary to exclude viral causes of liver dysfunction and to confirm characteristic abnormalities of small bile ducts. Institution of high-dose immunosuppression can prevent progressive bile duct destruction and effect resolution of jaundice if given early.

Clinicopathological analysis of liver allograft biopsies with late centrilobular necrosis: a comparative study in 54 patients

BACKGROUND

Centrilobular necrosis (CLN) in liver allografts can be a difficult lesion to interpret histologically. Although long recognized in association with developing chronic rejection, recent studies have described the lesion in association with a number of other disease processes. To clarify the histologic features that could allow a specific diagnosis to be made and to determine the outcome in different diagnostic groups, we assessed biopsies from 54 patients with CLN.

METHODS

Biopsies were classified as CLN with acute cellular rejection (ACR), CLN with hepatitis, CLN with developing chronic rejection (CR), and CLN of other etiology. Histologic features were assessed and then compared between groups, and clinical outcomes were noted.

RESULTS

Discriminating features for the different groups were as follows: CLN and ACR showed bile duct injury, endothelialitis, and acinar congestion. CLN and CR showed severe bile duct injury, bile duct loss, or centrilobular swelling. CLN and hepatitis was often a diagnosis of exclusion, although interface hepatitis was more common in this group. Cases of autoimmune hepatitis usually demonstrated plasma cell predominance in the portal and acinar inflammatory infiltrate. Significantly, there was considerable overlap in the histologic features between the groups, accounting for the diagnostic difficulty. Patients in whom the CLN was associated with CR or vascular complications generally required retransplantation or died, but in the groups with ACR and hepatitis, the outcome was more favorable.

CONCLUSIONS

With regard to most liver allograft biopsies showing late CLN, it is possible to make a specific diagnosis despite overlapping histologic features; this allows specific therapy to be instituted. Ultimately this is likely to contribute to improved graft survival.

Expression patterns of integrin receptors and extracellular matrix proteins in chronic rejection of human liver allografts

The beta1-integrin family of adhesion molecules is supposed to mediate cell-to-matrix interactions involved in a variety of immune reactions, especially in those associated with tissue remodelling. In an attempt to determine the role of beta1-integrins in the initiation and maintenance of fibrotic deposition observed in chronic rejection after liver transplantation, we immunohistochemically analysed the expression of different extracellular matrix components and the very late antigen (VLA) family of beta1-integrins in 11 samples of chronically rejected human liver allografts and compared results to findings in acutely rejected transplants and nontransplanted chronic inflammatory livers. In contrast to normal liver specimens, chronically rejected human liver allografts displayed a general overexpression of matrix components along sinusoids throughout the tissue and an additional characteristic accumulation in pericentral areas. Accordingly, VLA-1, -5 and -6 demonstrated a linear upregulation or de novo expression on sinusoidal lining cells, VLA-1 and VLA-4 additionally displayed concentration within pericentral fibrotic deposits. VLA-2 and -3 were only sporadically found. In accordance with findings in chronic rejection, chronic inflammatory livers showed overexpression of VLA-1, -5 and -6 within sinusoids and accumulation of VLA-1 and -4 in fibrotic septa. In contrast, acutely rejected allografts displayed slight overexpression of ECM components without characteristic accumulates, hence beta1-integrins were seen to be equally distributed throughout the parenchyma. Altogether, our analysis showed an upregulation of integrin receptors which corresponded to the extent of ECM deposition and thus suggested an important role for these molecules in the iniation of fibrosis observed in these specimens. Individual integrins showed different expression patterns within sinusoids and fibrotic areas, indicating distinct roles in differential stages of matrix accumulation, but induction patterns were generally similar in chronic inflammatory and chronically rejected livers, suggesting independence of the underlying disease.

"Silent" presentation of veno-occlusive disease after liver transplantation as part of the process of cellular rejection with endothelial predilection

Hemorrhagic centrilobular necrosis and fibrous stenosis of hepatic venules, suggesting veno-occlusive disease (VOD) have rarely been observed after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of this syndrome after OLT in relation to the course with particular reference to acute rejection and to azathioprine administration. VOD was identified in 19 of 1,023 patients transplanted over a 9-year period. VOD occurred at a median of 30 days posttransplantation, without clear cut clinical evidence for hepatic vein outlet obstruction. Seventeen of the 19 patients had an episode of acute rejection before or at the time of VOD. These episodes were compared with that of patients without VOD. In patients with VOD, portal inflammation and endothelialitis were enhanced (P =.014 and P =.048) and endothelialitis was also higher than bile duct damage (P =.03). The incidence of a centrilobular endothelialitis for both groups was not different although an increased trend was observed in the study group (64% vs. 46%; P =.18). The incidence of persistent rejection was similar between both groups (47% vs. 41%). The incidence of chronic rejection was higher in the study group (29% vs. 10%; P =. 04). All patients with VOD received azathioprine as part of immunosuppressive regimen. Despite azathioprine withdrawal, zone 3 changes persisted in 57% of patients. In conclusion, the incidence of VOD was 1.9% after OLT. The association of prominent endothelial involvement and VOD with acute rejection in most cases suggests an immunological phenomenon.

Immune cholangitis: liver allograft rejection and graft-versus-host disease

A pronounced similarity exists between liver allograft rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in the damage and eventual destruction of small intrahepatic bile ducts. Although an immunologic reaction has an important role, precisely identifying the target antigens or reason for persistence of the immune response has been difficult. An important difference between GVHD and liver rejection is the development of obliterative arteriopathy only in rejection. The three main histopathologic features of acute rejection are a predominantly mononuclear but mixed portal inflammation, subendothelial inflammation of portal or terminal hepatic veins (or both), and bile duct inflammation and damage. In acute rejection, a controversial issue is determining when therapeutic intervention is needed. The recommended approach is to base treatment on a combination of histopathologic changes and liver injury or dysfunction. Chronic rejection, which usually does not occur before 2 months after transplantation, is characterized by two main histopathologic features: (1) damage and loss of small bile ducts and (2) obliterative arteriopathy. Acute GVHD begins within the first month after transplantation and most commonly involves the skin, gastrointestinal tract, and liver, whereas chronic GVHD usually develops more than 80 to 100 days after liver transplantation and affects 30 to 50% of long-term survivors. Recognition of the early, cellular stages of chronic GVHD is important in preventing irreversible damage.

Prognostic implications of centrilobular necrosis in pediatric liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

We have observed centrilobular necrosis (CLN) in several liver allograft biopsies in our pediatric liver transplant population. The aims of this study were to describe the associated pathologic and clinical features of post-orthotopic liver transplantation CLN and determine its prognostic implications.

METHODS AND RESULTS

CLN was identified and characterized in 44 allografts from 40 patients (17 males and 23 females) among our 443 pediatric recipients. Twenty episodes were associated with cellular rejection, either in the same biopsy (n=15) or within the week prior (n=5), and five were associated with ductopenic rejection. Twelve were associated with vascular thrombosis. No clear etiology was identified in seven episodes, but two also had cholangitis lenta. Of the remaining five biopsies, three showed only centrilobular dropout, suggesting a resolution of some previous insult. The outcome of 40 patients following an initial episode of CLN was poor, with graft failure in 33, chronic poor function in 2, and normal recovery in only 5 patients. The results of retransplantation for graft failure due to CLN were equally poor, with 14 deaths, 3 patients with ductopenic rejection, and only 5 with normal recovery. CLN recurred in four grafts. Overall patient outcome was very poor: 25 deaths; 3 ductopenic rejections; 2 chronic poorly functioning livers; and 10 patients alive and well.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that CLN in pediatric orthotopic liver transplantation recipients is associated with cellular rejection, ductopenic rejection, or acute vessel thrombosis in the majority cases. The prognostic implications of CLN are grave, with high rates of graft failure requiring retransplantation and death.

Central venulitis in the allograft liver: a clinicopathologic study

BACKGROUND

Central venulitis denotes a histologic lesion of the allograft liver characterized by perivenular and subendothelial mononuclear inflammation of the terminal hepatic venules associated with varying degrees of perivenular hepatocyte dropout. Although this lesion has generally been considered a manifestation of acute rejection, some have suggested that it instead represents tacrolimus hepatotoxicity.

METHODS

We therefore compared the clinicopathologic features of 30 episodes of isolated central venulitis with 22 episodes of combined central venulitis and typical portal acute rejection occurring in 27 patients. Nineteen of the patients received tacrolimus and eight received cyclosporine as primary immunosuppression.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between the two groups, except that isolated central venulitis more often displayed a mild inflammatory component (P=0.007) with small lymphocytes as the predominant cell type (P=0.002). None of the patients had tacrolimus or cyclosporine levels that exceeded the therapeutic range, and none had other clinical evidence of drug toxicity. Usual antirejection therapy was instituted in all but two episodes; response was evident in 93% (28 of 30) of the isolated central venulitis and 86% (19 of 22) of the central venulitis-portal acute rejection group, with histologic regression documented in all follow-up specimens (four and five, respectively). Due to persistent central venulitis, two cyclosporine patients were switched to tacrolimus, with prompt resolution.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings are inconsistent with the concept that central venulitis represents drug toxicity and indicate instead that it is a form of acute allograft rejection.

Fibrosis in chronic rejection of human liver allografts: expression patterns of transforming growth factor-TGFbeta1 and TGF-beta3

Activation and transformation of lipocytes (Ito cells, stellate cells) into alpha-actin-positive myofibroblast-like cells is an essential step in the initiation of liver fibrosis. Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) is considered an important mediator of this process. In order to determine mechanisms of fibrotic deposition in a hepatic transplant setting, we analyzed 10 chronically rejected human liver allografts for the expression of extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules, myofibroblast-like cells (alpha-actin), macrophages, and TGF-beta1 and -beta3. Using single- and double-immunohistochemical staining techniques, all specimens investigated showed increased deposition of the ECM proteins fibronectin, tenascin, undulin, and collagen VI with a characteristic densification especially in pericentral areas. Likewise, strong accumulation of alpha-actin-positive cells and TGF-beta1-expressing macrophages was observed in the same fields, supporting the concept of lipocyte activation/transformation and subsequent ECM production fostered by macrophage-derived TGF-beta1. In contrast, TGF-beta3 was found to be mainly expressed by a markedly increased number of lipocytes. Interestingly, distribution of TGF-beta3 corresponded to that of tenascin, an ECM molecule known to be involved in early matrix organization, suggesting that TGF-beta3 may likewise act mainly in early stages of fibrogenesis. Furthermore, TGF-beta3 restriction to high numbers of a single cell type (i.e., lipocytes) implied a possible role in cell proliferation through autocrine loops. In conclusion, fibrosis in chronic rejection seems to follow similar mechanisms as in non-transplanted livers but additionally suggests differential temporal and functional roles for the TGF-beta isoforms 1 and 3 in the course of a multistep process leading to lipocyte transformation and ECM production.

Centrilobular necrosis after orthotopic liver transplantation: a longitudinal clinicopathologic study in 71 patients

Centrilobular necrosis (CLN) is a histological finding often encountered after orthotopic liver transplantation, but its pathogenesis is still unknown. In this study, the significance of CLN was assessed in a series of 227 consecutive liver transplantations performed between January 1989, and December 1991. Seventy-one patients (30.9%) showed CLN on at least one biopsy result, which were obtained because of an increase of aspartate aminotransferase activity. Their liver specimens were reviewed, and 19 histological features were recorded with particular attention given to lobular changes in acinar zone 3, to features commonly attributed to cellular and ductopenic rejection, and to changes suggestive of ischemia. CLN could first be observed either soon (within 4 days) or late (up to 3 years) after transplantation. Only 23 (32.4%) specimens had centrilobular necrosis affecting more than 75% of acinar zones 3. In 60 cases (84.5%) the lesion was limited to acinar zone 3. An important associated feature was sinusoidal congestion in 73.2% of cases. Fifty-one of 71 patients (71.8%) had histological features of cellular rejection before or at the time of CLN, and 13 of these progressed to ductopenic rejection versus 3 of the 156 patients without CLN (P < .0001). Nine patients had a recurrence of CLN, of whom 2 progressed to ductopenic rejection, a recurrence rate of 16.7% in this series. The survival of patients with CLN is worsened by associated ductopenic portal tracts compared with those without ductopenia (P = .0189-Mantel-Cox). This histological combination, irrespective of the serum bilirubin level, may warrant an early conversion to FK506-based immunosuppression.

Etiopathogenesis and prognosis of centrilobular necrosis in hepatic grafts

The incidence, contributing etiopathogenetic factors, and prognostic significance of centrilobular necrosis were investigated in 270 hepatic transplants to 215 immunosuppressed patients in whom 837 biopsies were performed. Twenty-six (9.6%) grafts demonstrated centrilobular necrosis in one or more biopsy specimens. The immunological, clinical, histopathological, and evolutionary features of this patient group (group A) were compared with a control group of patients who had undergone 92 consecutive transplants with no necrosis (group B). Group A was younger (p < 0.01), had a higher average of warm and cold-ischemia time (p < 0.05), a higher incidence (p < 0.001) and earlier appearance of acute rejection episodes (p < 0.01), and a closer association with evolution to chronic rejection (A: 53.8% vs B: 13.1%, p < 0.001). Survival rates for grafts and patients with necrosis at 12 and 30 months were significantly lower (p < 0.001). The 26 grafts were distributed into three chronological subgroups according to when necrosis appeared: (1) First week--All these grafts were lost (four through primary graft nonfunction and one due to protal recurrent thrombosis); (2) Second week--seven grafts with associated acute rejection, with three evolving to chronic rejection; (3) After the second week (116 +/- 82 days)--five with isolated necrosis, two with associated acute rejection, four with associated ductopenia, and three with associated acute rejection and ductopenia. In 11 grafts the necrosis persisted and evolved to chronic rejection. In conclusion, these findings indicate that centrilobular necrosis is a histopathological sign associated with poor prognosis in most hepatic grafts.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hepatic venular stenosis after orthotopic liver transplantation

Fibrous stenosis of hepatic venules and other features of venous outflow obstruction, including zone 3 congestion and hemorrhage, are sometimes seen after orthotopic liver transplantation. similar changes associated with endothelial damage have recently been ascribed to azathioprine toxicity and may be forerunners of chronic rejection. Other potential causative agents such as viral hepatitis have yet to be considered. We reviewed 49 liver biopsy specimens from 21 consecutive patients after orthotopic liver transplantation, in whom full data including further follow-up biopsy samples were available. Hepatic venous stenosis was identified in seven patients who had received azathioprine and two additional patients in whom this change could not be ascribed to azathioprine. Stenosis was always associated with zone 3 hemorrhage and congestion and was first noted between 5 and 30 days after transplantation in all but two cases; in these two patients they were first noted after 72 and 133 days. Cellular rejection, including endotheliitis involving terminal hepatic venules, was found in five of the seven patients who had received azathioprine. Chronic (ductopenic) rejection was not seen during a follow-up period of between 97 and 540 days. In three of the nine patients with hepatic venular stenosis, zone 3 changes persisted, and in two of these azathioprine could not be held responsible. Of the 12 patients without hepatic venular stenosis, 10 had received azathioprine. Two of these 12 patients had peliosis-like foci but no other vascular abnormalities. Both also had moderate cellular rejection. Hepatic venular stenosis was found in 43% of patients after liver transplantation; this was usually associated with azathioprine administration and concomitant cellular rejection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hepatic allograft rejection: new developments in terminology, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment

Hepatic allograft rejection remains a major cause of morbidity related to the need for increased immunosuppression and continues to be a principal cause of late failure of the graft. Hepatic allograft rejection is defined on the basis of morphologic findings; cellular rejection is defined as portal or periportal hepatitis with nonsuppurative cholangitis or endotheliitis (or both), and ductopenic rejection is defined as loss of interlobular and septal bile ducts, typically in at least 50% of the portal tracts. The overall incidence of episodes of cellular rejection, which usually occur within the first 2 weeks after liver transplantation, varies from 50 to 100%. Ductopenic rejection occurs in approximately 8% of patients who undergo initial liver transplantation and is usually diagnosed between 6 weeks and 6 months after transplantation. Induction and maintenance immunosuppression with triple-drug (cyclosporine, prednisone, and azathioprine) therapy and other combinations that include antilymphocyte preparations, however, has decreased the incidence of both cellular and ductopenic rejection. In patients experiencing episodes of cellular rejection, high-dose intravenously administered corticosteroid therapy yields the best response and is associated with a lower incidence of ductopenic rejection than is low-dose and orally administered corticosteroid therapy. The correlation between degree of biochemical liver dysfunction and presence of histologic rejection is minimal early after transplantation. Histologic severity of rejection, however, suggests which patients will require more immunosuppression and which patients may need antilymphocyte therapy for controlling the rejection episode. With the availability of new immunosuppressive agents, distinguishing patients at high risk for rejection is important. The goals for use of new immunosuppressive agents and regimens are to improve graft and patient survival, to decrease the incidence of cellular and ductopenic rejection, and to minimize side effects and complications.

Current concepts in cell-mediated hepatic allograft rejection leading to ductopenia and liver failure

Hepatic allograft rejection is presently classified into acute and chronic rejection based on histological features, timing and reversibility. However, because features of both types of rejection can occur at any time, and in many combinations, the terms "acute" and "chronic" seem inappropriate in some instances. Thus the term "cellular rejection" better defines the histological features of portal hepatitis, nonsuppurative destructive cholangitis and endotheliitis, which are independent of time and response to therapy. Similarly, because progressive bile duct destruction leading to a decrease in the number of interlobular and septal bile ducts is the major histological feature of "chronic rejection," the term "ductopenic rejection," defined as the loss of bile ducts in 50% or more of portal tracts independent of time and reversibility, seems more appropriate. The pathogenesis of cell-mediated rejection has not been completely explained; however, direct immunocytic attack on small bile ducts and small arteries appear to be the major feature. The process may lead to bile duct loss ("ductopenia"). The pathogenetic role of foam-cell arteritis resulting in ischemic bile duct injury and the role of humoral mechanisms in causing ductopenic rejection awaits further clarification. In the past, irreversible ductopenic rejection occurred in approximately 10% of all patients who underwent their first liver transplantation; this figure, however, appears to be decreasing. The clinical features of irreversible rejection include persistent and progressive cholestasis; rising serum levels of bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase and gamma-glutamyltransferase; and a decrease in hepatic synthetic function. Ductopenic rejection can occur early (2 to 5 wk after liver transplantation) but most often develops between 6 wk and 6 mo after transplantation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Diffuse hepatocyte ballooning in liver biopsies from orthotopic liver transplant patients

Mild to moderate liver injury to the orthotopically transplanted liver may result from acute rejection, mild ischaemia, or viral hepatitis. Because these conditions are often clinically indistinguishable, liver biopsy is frequently helpful. We previously characterized and reported the morphological spectrum of mild-to-moderate ischaemic injury from 170 liver biopsies (51 liver transplant patients). During this review, we found eight patients with a diffuse hepatocyte ballooning pattern. This pattern had some similarity to 'preservation injury' described by others, and in fact seven of the eight patients had these changes within the first 2 weeks post-transplant. However, two of the seven patients also displayed these changes up to 6 months post-transplant and the eighth patient developed these histological patterns only after the early post-transplant period. Follow-up data on patients with diffuse hepatocyte ballooning showed that some reverted to normal histology, some transformed to well-delineated perivenular ballooning, and some progressed to perivenular necrosis and/or infarction. Only when superimposed perivenular necrosis became apparent did the injury become irreversible, necessitating allograft removal or resulting in death. The pathogenesis of diffuse hepatocyte ballooning is unclear. However, the association of some of the cases with 'preservation injury' pattern in the early post-transplant period and the progression of others to necrosis and infarction, suggest an ischaemic basis for this lesion.