Anti-thrombotic efficacies of enoxaparin, dalteparin, and unfractionated heparin in venous thrombo-embolism

Pharmacology of Heparin and Related Drugs: An Update

Heparin has been used extensively as an antithrombotic and anticoagulant for close to 100 years. This anticoagulant activity is attributed mainly to the pentasaccharide sequence, which potentiates the inhibitory action of antithrombin, a major inhibitor of the coagulation cascade. More recently it has been elucidated that heparin exhibits anti-inflammatory effect via interference of the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps and this may also contribute to heparin's antithrombotic activity. This illustrates that heparin interacts with a broad range of biomolecules, exerting both anticoagulant and nonanticoagulant actions. Since our previous review, there has been an increased interest in these nonanticoagulant effects of heparin, with the beneficial role in patients infected with SARS2-coronavirus a highly topical example. This article provides an update on our previous review with more recent developments and observations made for these novel uses of heparin and an overview of the development status of heparin-based drugs. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This state-of-the-art review covers recent developments in the use of heparin and heparin-like materials as anticoagulant, now including immunothrombosis observations, and as nonanticoagulant including a role in the treatment of SARS-coronavirus and inflammatory conditions.

Therapeutic Strategies for Treatment of Immune-Mediated Hemolytic Anemia

Immune-mediated hemolytic anemia is a common hematologic disorder in dogs. Disease management involves immunosuppression using glucocorticoids, potentially in combination with other medications such as azathioprine, cyclosporine, or mycophenolate mofetil. Therapeutic drug monitoring may enhance the utility and maximize the safety of cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil. The disease is proinflammatory and prothrombotic. Antithrombotic drug administration is therefore essential, and anticoagulant therapy should be initiated at the time of diagnosis. Additional therapies include red blood cell transfusion to support blood oxygen content. Future therapies may include therapeutic plasma exchange, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, and complement inhibitors.

ACVIM consensus statement on the treatment of immune-mediated hemolytic anemia in dogs

Immune‐mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA) causes severe anemia in dogs and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Treatment with various immunosuppressive and antithrombotic drugs has been described anecdotally and in previous studies, but little consensus exists among veterinarians as to the optimal regimen to employ and maintain after diagnosis of the disease. To address this inconsistency and provide evidence‐based guidelines for treatment of IMHA in dogs, we identified and extracted data from studies published in the veterinary literature. We developed a novel tool for evaluation of evidence quality, using it to assess study design, diagnostic criteria, explanation of treatment regimens, and validity of statistical methods. In combination with our clinical experience and comparable guidelines for humans afflicted with autoimmune hemolytic anemia, we used the conclusions of this process to make a set of clinical recommendations regarding treatment of IMHA in dogs, which we refined subsequently by conducting several iterations of Delphi review. Additionally, we considered emerging treatments for IMHA in dogs and highlighted areas deserving of future research. Comments were solicited from several professional bodies to maximize clinical applicability before the recommendations were submitted for publication. The resulting document is intended to provide clinical guidelines for management of IMHA in dogs. These guidelines should be implemented pragmatically, with consideration of animal, owner, and veterinary factors that may vary among cases.

Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE): Domain 4-Refining and monitoring antithrombotic therapies

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the evidence for therapeutic monitoring of antithrombotic drugs in small animals, develop guidelines regarding antithrombotic monitoring, and identify knowledge gaps in the field.

DESIGN

First, a standardized, systematic literature review was conducted to address predefined PICO (Population/Patient, Intervention, Control, Outcome) questions, with categorization of relevant articles according to level of evidence and quality. Preliminary guidelines were developed by PICO worksheet authors and the domain chair. Thereafter, a Delphi-style survey was used to develop consensus on guidelines regarding therapeutic monitoring of antithrombotics in dogs and cats.

SETTING

Academic and referral veterinary medical centers.

RESULTS

PICO questions regarding the utility of therapeutic monitoring were developed for 6 different antithrombotic drugs or drug classes, including aspirin, clopidogrel, warfarin, unfractionated heparin, the low molecular weight heparins, and rivaroxaban, The majority of the literature pertaining to therapeutic monitoring of antithrombotic drugs was either performed in experimental animal models of disease or involved studies of drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy laboratory animals. There was a paucity of high level of evidence studies directly addressing the PICO questions, which limited the strength of recommendations that could be provided. The final guidelines recommend that therapeutic monitoring should be performed when using warfarin or unfractionated heparin in dogs and cats at risk of thrombosis. There is insufficient evidence to make strong recommendations for therapeutic monitoring of aspirin or low molecular weight heparin in dogs and cats at this time.

CONCLUSIONS

As in other CURATIVE domains, significant knowledge gaps were highlighted, indicating the need for substantial additional research in this field. Ongoing investigation of the role of therapeutic monitoring of antithrombotic therapies will undoubtedly facilitate improved outcomes for dogs and cats at risk of thrombosis.

American College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care (ACVECC) Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE) guidelines: Small animal

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review available evidence and establish guidelines related to the risk of developing thrombosis and the management of small animals with antithrombotics.

DESIGN

Standardized, systematic evaluation of the literature (identified by searching Medline via PubMed and CAB abstracts) was carried out in 5 domains (Defining populations at risk; Defining rational therapeutic use; Defining evidence-based protocols; Refining and monitoring antithrombotic therapies; and Discontinuing antithrombotic therapies). Evidence evaluation was carried out using Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome generated within each domain questions to address specific aims. This was followed by categorization of relevant articles according to level of evidence and quality (Good, Fair, or Poor). Synthesis of these data led to the development of a series of statements. Consensus on the final guidelines was achieved via Delphi-style surveys. Draft recommendations were presented at 2 international veterinary conferences and made available for community assessment, review, and comment prior to final revisions and publication.

SETTINGS

Academic and referral veterinary medical centers.

RESULTS

Over 500 studies were reviewed in detail. Worksheets from all 5 domains generated 59 statements with 83 guideline recommendations that were refined during 3 rounds of Delphi surveys. A high degree of consensus was reached across all guideline recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, systematic evidence evaluations yielded more than 80 recommendations for the treatment of small animals with or at risk of developing thrombosis. Numerous significant knowledge gaps were highlighted by the evidence reviews undertaken, indicating the need for substantial additional research in this field.

Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE): Domain 3-Defining antithrombotic protocols

OBJECTIVES

To systematically examine the evidence for use of a specific protocol (dose, frequency, route) of selected antithrombotic drugs, in comparisons to no therapy or to other antithrombotic therapies, to reduce the risk of complications or improve outcomes in dogs and cats at risk for thrombosis.

DESIGN

Standardized, systematic evaluation of the literature, categorization of relevant articles according to level of evidence (LOE) and quality (Good, Fair, or Poor), and development of consensus on conclusions via a Delphi-style survey for application of the concepts to clinical practice.

SETTINGS

Academic and referral veterinary medical centers.

RESULTS

Databases searched included Medline via PubMed and CAB abstracts. Eight different antithrombotic drugs were investigated using a standardized Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) question format both for dogs and cats, including aspirin, clopidogrel, warfarin, unfractionated heparin (UFH), dalteparin, enoxaparin, fondaparinux, and rivaroxaban, generating a total of 16 worksheets. Most studies identified were experimental controlled laboratory studies in companion animals (LOE 3) with only four randomized controlled clinical trials in companion animals (LOE 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, evidence-based recommendations concerning specific protocols could not be formulated for most antithrombotic drugs evaluated, either because of the wide range of dosage reported (eg, aspirin in dogs) or the lack of evidence in the current literature. However, clopidogrel administration in dogs and cats at risk of arterial thrombosis, notably in cats at risk of cardiogenic thromboembolism, is supported by the literature, and specific protocols were recommended. Comparably, aspirin should not be used as a sole antithrombotic in cats with cardiomyopathy. Using the available safety profile information contained in the literature, the panel reached consensus on suggested dosage schemes for most antithrombotics. Significant knowledge gaps were highlighted, which will hopefully drive novel research.

Clinical experience of anti-Xa monitoring in critically ill dogs receiving dalteparin

OBJECTIVES

To describe a population of critically ill dogs receiving dalteparin monitored with an anti-Xa assay, to assess the potential utility of serial monitoring, and to investigate the association between pre-treatment thromboelastography (TEG) and the ability to achieve targeted anti-Xa activity.

DESIGN

Descriptive retrospective study.

SETTING

Veterinary teaching hospital.

ANIMALS

Thirty-eight client-owned dogs receiving dalteparin and monitored with an anti-Xa assay.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for signalment, underlying disease, clinicopathological data, occurrence of thromboembolic events, complications, and outcome. Thirty-eight dogs receiving dalteparin were monitored with an anti-Xa assay. Diseases included hematological disease, protein-losing disease, neoplastic disease, and septic processes. Pretreatment hypercoagulability was present in 34/35 dogs by assessment of TEG. Five cases of thromboembolism were confirmed prior to starting treatment and 4 cases occurred during hospitalization. Bleeding complications were rare (3/38) and 29/38 dogs survived to discharge. Interpretation of the anti-Xa assay allowed for dose adjustment although reliable achievement of target anti-Xa activity was not demonstrated. Dogs with higher G values on pretreatment TEG were significantly less likely to achieve the target anti-Xa activity (ie, be above or below the target range).

CONCLUSIONS

Dalteparin was well tolerated in a heterogeneous population of dogs. However, dose adjustment in response to anti-Xa activity interpretation inconsistently resulted in subsequent attainment of the target anti-Xa range. Development of guidelines may be warranted to more consistently achieve the target range. Dogs that appear more hypercoagulable on pre-treatment TEG may require closer monitoring and greater dose adjustment to achieve the target anti-Xa range.

Pulmonary emboli imaging with (99m)Tc-labelled anti-D-dimer (DI-80B3) Fab' followed by SPECT

OBJECTIVES

Pre-clinical experiments demonstrated that intravenous (99m)Tc labelled DI-DD-3B6/22-80B3 humanised anti-fibrin-D-dimer Fab' fragments ((99m)Tc-DI-80B3) allowed scintigraphic imaging of acute pulmonary emboli (PE). The aims of this clinical study were to determine the safety of (99m)Tc-DI-80B3 in patients with PE and evaluate the resulting scintigraphic images for the localisation of acute PE.

MATERIALS/PATIENTS AND METHODS

(99m)Tc-DI-80B3 (0.5mg, 710-850MBq) was administered intravenously to subjects (n=14) with segmental or larger PE on recent contrast-enhanced helical CT scans. Thoracic SPECT scans were acquired 15 minutes, 2 hours and 4 hours afterwards. Subjects were followed for 90 days subsequently.

RESULTS

There were no serious adverse events or antibody responses associated with (99m)Tc-DI-80B3 administration. Focal accumulations of (99m)Tc-DI-80B3 on the SPECT images of the thorax acquired at four hours corresponded to pulmonary emboli detected by CT. Two independent "blinded" SPECT readers identified 79% and 71% (respectively) of the right lung and 79% and 64% (respectively) of the left lung in which CT scans disclosed PE.

CONCLUSIONS

(99m)Tc-DI-80B3 is well-tolerated in patients with acute PE and does not induce an immune response. (99m)Tc-DI-80B3 may offer a novel approach to imaging PE in a clinically acceptable timeframe without exposure to potentially nephrotoxic radiographic contrast agents.

An endogenously deposited fibrin scaffold determines construct size in the surgically created arteriovenous loop chamber model of tissue engineering

BACKGROUND

An arteriovenous loop (AVL) enclosed in a polycarbonate chamber in vivo, produces a fibrin exudate which acts as a provisional matrix for the development of a tissue engineered microcirculatory network.

OBJECTIVES

By administering enoxaparin sodium - an inhibitor of fibrin polymerization, the significance of fibrin scaffold formation on AVL construct size (including the AVL, fibrin scaffold, and new tissue growth into the fibrin), growth, and vascularization were assessed and compared to controls.

METHODS

In Sprague Dawley rats, an AVL was created on femoral vessels and inserted into a polycarbonate chamber in the groin in 3 control groups (Series I) and 3 experimental groups (Series II). Two hours before surgery and 6 hours post-surgery, saline (Series I) or enoxaparin sodium (0.6 mg/kg, Series II) was administered intra-peritoneally. Thereafter, the rats were injected daily with saline (Series I) or enoxaparin sodium (1.5 mg/kg, Series II) until construct retrieval at 3, 10, or 21 days. The retrieved constructs underwent weight and volume measurements, and morphologic/morphometric analysis of new tissue components.

RESULTS

Enoxaparin sodium treatment resulted in the development of smaller AVL constructs at 3, 10, and 21 days. Construct weight and volume were significantly reduced at 10 days (control weight 0.337 +/- 0.016 g [Mean +/- SEM] vs treated 0.228 +/- 0.048, [P < .001]: control volume 0.317 +/- 0.015 mL vs treated 0.184 +/- 0.039 mL [P < .01]) and 21 days (control weight 0.306 +/- 0.053 g vs treated 0.198 +/- 0.043 g [P < .01]: control volume 0.285 +/- 0.047 mL vs treated 0.148 +/- 0.041 mL, [P < .01]). Angiogenesis was delayed in the enoxaparin sodium-treated constructs with the absolute vascular volume significantly decreased at 10 days (control vascular volume 0.029 +/- 0.03 mL vs treated 0.012 +/- 0.002 mL [P < .05]).

CONCLUSION

In this in vivo tissue engineering model, endogenous, extra-vascularly deposited fibrin volume determines construct size and vascular growth in the first 3 weeks and is, therefore, critical to full construct development.

Pharmacokinetics of UH and LMWH are similar with respect to antithrombin activity

BACKGROUND

The ability to administer low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) subcutaneously without laboratory monitoring contributes to their popularity for the treatment of thrombotic disorders. Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin, although less expensive, is deemed to require routine laboratory monitoring on the basis of more variability in drug effect compared to LMWH. However, the more predictable pharmacokinetic profiles of low molecular weight heparins are largely based on anti-Xa activity, while antithrombin activity may be at least as important to their mechanisms of action.

METHODS

We performed a clinical pharmacokinetic trial to compare the variability in peak antithrombin effect between subcutaneous unfractionated heparin and various LMWHs, all given in recommended weight-adjusted treatment doses. Sixty-one patients enrolled in a warfarin clinic were randomized to receive one of four different weight-adjusted subcutaneous heparin doses: unfractionated heparin, 250 units/kg (n=15); tinzaparin, 175 units/kg (n=15); dalteparin, 200 units/kg (n=15); or enoxaparin, 1 mg/kg (n=16). The areas under the curves of antithrombin levels during the first 3 h after administration were determined for each patient, and the coefficients of variation (CV) and 95% confidence intervals of the AUCs were compared among the treatment groups.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in the coefficients of variation of antithrombin effect between unfractionated heparin (52.8, 95% CI: 32.6-72.9) and enoxaparin (56.5, 95% CI: 35.7-77.4) or dalteparin (43.5, 95% CI 25.4-61.6). Tinzaparin had statistically significant decrease in coefficients of variation (21.6, 95% CI: 12.2-30.9) relative to unfractionated heparin, dalteparin and enoxaparin.

CONCLUSIONS

LMWHs, as a class of drugs, are no more predictable in antithrombin effect after subcutaneous injection than unfractionated heparin. There were considerable differences among LMWHs in the observed variability of antithrombin effects, with tinzaparin being somewhat more predictable than the other drugs tested.

Use of a jugular vein autograft for reconstruction of the cranial vena cava in a dog with invasive thymoma and cranial vena cava syndrome

A spayed female dog was evaluated because of edema of the ventral cervical region, lethargy, cough, and reduced exercise tolerance. Invasive thymoma and cranial vena cava syndrome were diagnosed by use of ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy and contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography. Resection of the cranial vena cava and an autogenous jugular vein graft were used for restoration of normal venous return to the right atrium and alleviation of the cranial vena cava syndrome.

Improved imaging of deep venous thrombi during anticoagulation using radiolabelled anti-D-dimer antibodies

OBJECTIVES

Radiolabelled anti-fibrin antibodies have not yet enabled reliable and practical diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. However, previous unsuccessful clinical trials were performed with anti-fibrin beta-chain antibodies that do not optimally bind to thrombi during anticoagulation. The current experiments were performed to determine if radiolabelled anti-D-dimer antibodies more reliably allowed nuclear medicine imaging of deep venous thrombi during anticoagulation than anti-beta-chain antibodies.

METHODS

Dogs with pre-existing unilateral femoral vein thrombi were anticoagulated with heparin (300 units.kg (-1) bolus followed by 90 units.kg(-1).h(-1) continuous infusion). They were then allocated to receive one of three (111)In labelled antibodies: anti-D-dimer, anti-beta or a non-specific control antibody. Gamma scans of the legs were performed at regular intervals for 24 h. Scans were interpreted in a blinded fashion and the number of gamma counts from the femoral area on the thrombosed side was compared to the contralateral side. Clot/blood isotope density ratios were determined post-mortem.

RESULTS

Leg thrombi were 100% detectable in the anti-D-dimer group, but only 60% detectable in the anti-beta group. Mean +/- SD relative counts in the thrombosed femoral area was 137 +/- 10% compared to the contralateral side in the anti-D-dimer group, but only 116 +/- 20% in the anti-beta group. The clot/blood ratio was 24.5 +/- 2.8 in the anti-D-dimer group, but only 7.8 +/- 2.0 in the anti-beta group.

CONCLUSIONS

In labelled anti-D-dimer provides superior nuclear medicine images of thrombi during intensive anticoagulation compared to anti-beta. Clinical results with radiolabelled anti-D-dimer may be more promising than those previously observed with other anti-fibrin antibodies.

Single photon emission computed tomography of pulmonary emboli and venous thrombi using anti-D-dimer

Previous attempts to diagnose thromboemboli using radiolabeled antibodies and nuclear medicine imaging have been disappointing. We present the results of experiments with intravenous technetium-99m-labeled deimmunized antifibrin Fab' fragments to diagnose thromboemboli using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), a highly sensitive scintigraphic imaging technique. Pulmonary emboli (PEs) and lower extremity deep vein thrombi (DVTs) were formed in five dogs, then technetium-99m-labeled Fab' ( approximately 400 mg, approximately 260 MBq) were injected via forelimb veins. Thoracic and lower extremity SPECT scans were performed at 2-hour intervals after antibody infusion to visualize the thromboemboli. Four hours after antibody infusion, all PEs and DVTs of mass 0.4 g or greater were clearly visualized on SPECT scans as 'hot spots' within the lungs and legs, respectively. PEs (0.48 +/- 0.09 g) were intensely radiolabeled, yielding clot/blood radioactivity ratios of 22.8 +/- 5.6. DVTs (0.45 +/- 0.31 g) also had high clot/blood ratios (11.7 +/- 2.6). Infusion of these radiolabeled antibody fragments, combined with SPECT, produces clear images of PEs and DVTs within a clinically feasible time frame. The technique reliably identified even peripheral thromboemboli of relatively small size, which are difficult to diagnose with currently available imaging techniques, and may enable imaging of PEs, DVTs, or both in the same patient.

Urine and plasma levels of fibrinopeptide B in patients with deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND

Many patients with pulmonary thromboembolism remain undiagnosed, possibly because of the difficulty clinicians have in determining which patients merit work-up with accurate (but expensive) imaging techniques.

OBJECTIVES

We present the first prospective clinical study of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) detection using the FPBtot assay, which measures fibrinopeptide B and its first derivative, des-arginine fibrinopeptide B.

METHODS

Twenty three patients with signs or symptoms of PE or DVT were enrolled in the study prior to the performance of definitive testing. Using a novel immunoassay, FPBtot levels were measured in urine and plasma samples from patients as well as from healthy controls. Urine and plasma FPBtot levels were compared to the diagnostic results, as blindly adjudicated by one of the investigators. Patients were excluded if they withdrew (n =1), had inconclusive diagnostic testing (n = 7), or did not give samples (n = 2 for urine, n = 3 for plasma).

RESULTS

The mean FPBtot concentration in the urine of the 'DVT/PE positive' group was 78.4 +/- 35.2 ng/ml and 2.7 +/- 1.9 ng/ml in the 'DVT/PE negative' group (p = 0.03). The urine FPB(tot) concentrations in the 'DVT/PE negative' group were not significantly different from those in the healthy control group (2.2 +/- 0.4 ng/ml, p = 0.40). The area under the ROC curve for urine FPB(tot) concentrations was 97.3 +/- 3.8%, suggesting a high degree of diagnostic accuracy. Plasma FPB(tot) concentrations were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Urine FPBtot levels may help detect patients with PE and DVT.

Heparin and low molecular weight heparin: background and pharmacology

The various LMWHs available for therapeutic use have multiple mechanisms of action, most of which are similar to the mechanisms of UH. The relative potencies of expression of the mechanisms differ between LMWH and UH and among specific LMWHs. The pharmacokinetics of LMWHs and UH are often measured according to the results of anti-Xa assays, although the correlation between anti-Xa levels and the antithrombotic activities of the drugs is questionable. Animal models of thrombosis give some information regarding the antithrombotic efficacy of different LMWHs when compared with UH and with other LMWHs, but the results are not directly applicable to human thrombosis. Unfortunately, no single measure of antithrombosis has been developed in humans whereby the potencies of LMWHs, UH, and other new anticoagulants can be directly compared. Large clinical outcome studies are expensive and difficult to carry out. Perhaps for this reason, different subcutaneous LMWHs have not been compared with each other in this format. Various LMWHs have demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety when compared with intravenous UH and high-dose subcutaneous UH, and it is reasonable to assume that there would not be large differences in efficacy and safety among different agents. The superiority of one subcutaneous regimen over another can be confirmed (or refuted) only by the performance of well-planned clinical studies.

Anticoagulation therapy

Despite refinements and standardization in the use of anticoagulants, many problems remain for clinicians. Dr. Crowther describes appropriate starting and maintenance doses of warfarin, factors accounting for inter- and intra-observer variability and importantly, the management of the over-anticoagulated patients and bleeding patients. Dr. White compares unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and addresses whether there truly are differences in the efficacy and safety of different LMWH's for both arterial and venous indications. Dr. Ortel discusses the management of the problem patient who requires anticoagulants, the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, the pregnant patient, the obese patient, patients who have renal insufficiency and/or liver disease, patients with malignant disease, and other challenging patient populations.