Perioperative anticoagulation management in patients who are receiving oral anticoagulant therapy: a practical guide for clinicians

Assessing Mailuoning injection in wound healing and thrombophlebitis management: A rat model study

Thrombophlebitis is the inflammatory condition characterized by obstruction of one or more vessels, commonly in the legs, due to the formation of blood clots. It has been reported that traditional Chinese medicine, including Mailuoning injection, is advantageous for treating inflammatory and blood disorders. This research assessed the therapeutic efficacy of Mailuoning injection in the treatment of thrombophlebitis in rodents, as well as investigated its impact on fibrinolysis, inflammation, and coagulation. An experimental setup for thrombophlebitis was established in rodents via modified ligation technique. Five groups comprised the animals: sham operation group, model group, and three Mailuoning treatment groups (low, medium, and high dosages). The pain response, edema, coagulation parameters (PT, APTT, TT, FIB), serum inflammatory markers (IL-6, TNF-α, CRP), and expression levels of endothelial markers (ICAM-1, VCAM-1, NF-κB) were evaluated. Blood flow and vascular function were further assessed by measuring hemorheological parameters and the concentrations of TXB2, ET, and 6-k-PGF1α. In contrast to the sham group, model group demonstrated statistically significant increases in endothelial expression levels, coagulation latencies, and inflammatory markers (p < 0.05). The administration of mailing, specifically at high and medium dosages, resulted in a substantial reduction in inflammatory markers, enhancement of coagulation parameters, suppression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 expression, and restoration of hemorheological measurements to baseline (p < 0.05). Significantly higher concentrations of 6-k-PGF1α and lower levels of TXB2 and ET were observed in high-dose group, suggesting that pro- and anti-thrombotic factors were restored to equilibrium. Utilization of Mailuoning injection in rat model of thrombophlebitis exhibited significant therapeutic impact. This effect was manifested through pain alleviation, diminished inflammation, enhanced blood viscosity and facilitation of fibrinolysis. The study indicated that Mailuoning injection may serve as a viable therapeutic option for thrombophlebitis, potentially aiding in the improvement of wound healing by virtue of its anti-inflammatory and blood flow-enhancing characteristics.

Frailty as an indicator of postoperative complications following surgical excision of non-melanoma skin cancer on the head and neck

INTRODUCTION

Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) predominantly affects those aged over 90 years, with 85% of lesions arising on the head and neck, where surgical excision remains the treatment of choice. Frailty is a measure of physiologic age and can be used as a predictor of adverse treatment outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine if the Rockwood Frailty Index is predictive of complications following excision of NMSC.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively for patients who underwent an excision of a suspected NMSC from the head or neck across a two-month period. Details of the patient, lesion and procedure were recorded alongside ASA grade and Rockwood's Frailty score. Postoperative complications were recorded four weeks later.

RESULTS

There was a total of 125 patients: 74 (60%) male, 51 (40%) female; mean age was 78 (±9.8) years. Of the excised sites, 61% were closed primarily, 26% with a full thickness skin graft (FTSG), 13% with a local flap. Frailty ranged from 1 to 7 (median = 4). ASA ranged from 1 to 4 (median = 3). A total of 21 (17%) patients reported postoperative complications. Within this group, the median frailty and ASA grades were 5 and 3. Both frailty and ASA were positively significantly associated with age (p ≤ 0.001). There was no significant difference between the frailty or ASA grades of patients that experienced complications and those who did not. Patients who had a FTSG were significantly more likely to experience complications (p ≤ 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty is not predictive of postoperative complications following excision of NMSC on the head and neck. Postoperative complications are significantly more associated with FTSG.

Perioperative management in chronically anticoagulated children undergoing tonsillectomy

BACKGROUND

When undergoing tonsillectomy, patients at high risk of thrombosis who require chronic anticoagulation therapy pose a special challenge as bleeding may occur up to 2 weeks after surgery. Because of a lack of evidence-based data, there is no consensus on the best management for such patients. The objective of our study was to review perioperative anticoagulation bridging strategies in children undergoing tonsillectomy.

METHODS

The study group were a retrospective series of patients on chronic anticoagulation therapy at high risk of a thromboembolic event, who underwent tonsillectomy from 2010 to 2021. Patients whose anticoagulation treatment was discontinued because of a low risk of thromboembolic events were excluded.

RESULTS

Four patients met the inclusion criteria (age range, 1.5-16.1 years). All patients were admitted prior to surgery for bridging therapy with intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH), drip-titrated to a therapeutic dose until 4-6 h prior to surgery. The estimated blood loss during surgery was minimal in all surgeries. Unfractionated heparin was readministered according to the hospital protocol on the night of surgery and titrated to a therapeutic dose. Warfarin was restarted within 2 days postsurgery for all patients. High-risk patients were kept in hospital until postoperative day 6-8 because of concern for delayed bleeding. One patient was noticed to have blood-tinged sputum requiring no intervention; none of the patients developed early or delayed hematemesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that bridging therapy with UFH has been successful in chronically anticoagulated patients undergoing tonsillectomy. These patients require multidisciplinary care for the management of their pre- and postoperative course.

Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy: An American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline

BACKGROUND

The American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline on the Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy addresses 43 Patients-Interventions-Comparators-Outcomes (PICO) questions related to the perioperative management of patients who are receiving long-term oral anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy and require an elective surgery/procedure. This guideline is separated into four broad categories, encompassing the management of patients who are receiving: (1) a vitamin K antagonist (VKA), mainly warfarin; (2) if receiving a VKA, the use of perioperative heparin bridging, typically with a low-molecular-weight heparin; (3) a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC); and (4) an antiplatelet drug.

METHODS

Strong or conditional practice recommendations are generated based on high, moderate, low, and very low certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology for clinical practice guidelines.

RESULTS

A multidisciplinary panel generated 44 guideline recommendations for the perioperative management of VKAs, heparin bridging, DOACs, and antiplatelet drugs, of which two are strong recommendations: (1) against the use of heparin bridging in patients with atrial fibrillation; and (2) continuation of VKA therapy in patients having a pacemaker or internal cardiac defibrillator implantation. There are separate recommendations on the perioperative management of patients who are undergoing minor procedures, comprising dental, dermatologic, ophthalmologic, pacemaker/internal cardiac defibrillator implantation, and GI (endoscopic) procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial new evidence has emerged since the 2012 iteration of these guidelines, especially to inform best practices for the perioperative management of patients who are receiving a VKA and may require heparin bridging, for the perioperative management of patients who are receiving a DOAC, and for patients who are receiving one or more antiplatelet drugs. Despite this new knowledge, uncertainty remains as to best practices for the majority of perioperative management questions.

Proximal femur fractures in patients taking anti-coagulants: has anything changed?

With an ever-ageing population, the incidence of hip fractures is increasing worldwide. Increasing age is not just associated with increasing fractures but also increasing comorbidities and polypharmacy.

Consequently, a large proportion of patients requiring hip fracture surgery (HFS) are also prescribed antiplatelet and anti-coagulant medication. There remains a clinical conundrum with regards to how such medications should affect surgery, namely with regards to anaesthetic options, timing of surgery, stopping and starting the medication as well as the need for reversal agents.

Herein, we present the up-to-date evidence on HFS management in patients taking blood-thinning agents and provide a summary of recommendations based on the existing literature.

Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome for Anesthesiologists: A Narrative Review and a Pragmatic Approach to Clinical Care

Post-acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) syndrome is a novel, poorly understood clinical entity with life-impacting ramifications. Patients with this syndrome, also known as "COVID-19 long-haulers," often present with nonspecific ailments involving more than one body system. The most common complaints include dyspnea, fatigue, brain fog, and chest pain. There currently is no single agreed-upon definition for post-acute COVID-19 syndrome, but most agree that criterion for this syndrome is the persistence of mental and physical health consequences after initial infection. Given the millions of acute infections in the United States over the course of the pandemic, perioperative providers will encounter these patients in clinical practice in growing numbers. Symptoms of the COVID-19 long-haulers should not be minimized, as these patients are at higher risk for postoperative respiratory complications and perioperative mortality for up to seven weeks after initial illness. Instead, a cautious multidisciplinary preoperative evaluation should be performed. Perioperative care should be viewed through the prism of best practices already in use, such as avoidance of benzodiazepines in patients with cognitive impairment and use of lung-protective ventilation. Recommendations especially relevant to the COVID-19 long-haulers include assessment of critical care myopathies and neuropathies to determine suitable neuromuscular blocking agents and reversal, preoperative workup of insidious cardiac or pulmonary pathologies in previously healthy patients, and, thorough medication review, particularly of anticoagulation regimens and chronic steroid use. In this article, the authors define the syndrome, synthesize the available scientific evidence, and make pragmatic suggestions regarding the perioperative clinical care of COVID-19 long-haulers.

Markedly increased risk of postoperative bleeding complications during perioperative bridging anticoagulation in general and visceral surgery

BACKGROUND

Increasing numbers of patients receiving oral anticoagulants are undergoing elective surgery. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is frequently applied as bridging therapy during perioperative interruption of anticoagulation. The aim of this study was to explore the postoperative bleeding risk of patients receiving surgery under bridging anticoagulation.

METHODS

We performed a monocentric retrospective two-arm matched cohort study. Patients that received perioperative bridging anticoagulation were compared to a matched control group with identical surgical procedure, age, and sex. Emergency and vascular operations were excluded. The primary endpoint was the incidence of major postoperative bleeding. Secondary endpoints were minor postoperative bleeding, thromboembolic events, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. Multivariate analysis explored risk factors of major postoperative bleeding.

RESULTS

A total of 263 patients in each study arm were analyzed. The patient cohort included the entire field of general and visceral surgery including a large proportion of major oncological resections. Bridging anticoagulation increased the postoperative incidence of major bleeding events (8% vs. 1%; p < 0.001) as well as minor bleeding events (14% vs. 5%; p < 0.001). Thromboembolic events were equally rare in both groups (1% vs. 2%; p = 0.45). No effect on mortality was observed (1.5% vs. 1.9%). Independent risk factors of major postoperative bleeding were full-therapeutic dose of LMWH, renal insufficiency, and the procedure-specific bleeding risk.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative bridging anticoagulation, especially full-therapeutic dose LMWH, markedly increases the risk of postoperative bleeding complications in general and visceral surgery. Surgeons should carefully consider the practice of routine bridging.

Proximal femur fractures in patients taking anticoagulants

Thirty per cent of patients presenting with proximal femoral fractures are receiving anticoagulant treatment for various other medical reasons. This pharmacological effect may necessitate reversal prior to surgical intervention to avoid interference with anaesthesia or excessive peri/post-operative bleeding. Consequently, delay to surgery usually occurs.

Platelet inhibitors (aspirin, clopidogrel) either alone or combined do not need to be discontinued to allow acute hip surgery. Platelet transfusions can be useful but are rarely needed.

Vitamin K antagonists (VKA, e.g. warfarin) should be reversed in a timely fashion and according to established readily accessible departmental protocols. Intravenous vitamin K on admission facilitates reliable reversal, and platelet complex concentrate (PCC) should be reserved for extreme scenarios.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) must be discontinued prior to hip fracture surgery but the length of time depends on renal function ranging traditionally from two to four days.

Recent evidence suggests that early surgery (within 48 hours) can be safe. No bridging therapy is generally recommended.

There is an urgent need for development of new commonly available antidotes for every DOAC as well as high-level evidence exploring DOAC effects in the acute hip fracture surgical setting.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:699-706. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190071

Bridging Anticoagulation with Mechanical Heart Valves: Current Guidelines and Clinical Decisions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The management of patients with mechanical heart valves who require surgery or invasive procedures is a common clinical scenario in contemporary practice. The risk of thromboembolism versus the risk of bleeding is the foundation of optimal patient care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Randomized, controlled trials are not available; yet, there is a wealth of experience to guide best practice. Current guidelines represent a compilation of data from trials of atrial fibrillation and expert opinion. Results from the PERI-OP trial of patients with either a mechanical heart valve, atrial fibrillation, or atrial flutter requiring interruption of oral anticoagulant therapy for surgery will inform clinical practice. Patient-specific factors and valve-specific factors are paramount when deciding whether a period of anticoagulant therapy interruption is safe. Similarly, the safety and efficacy of bridging anticoagulant therapy and the optimal time after surgery for restarting oral anticoagulants is vital to optimal patient care.

Ksassbeh A, Alrabadi N. The Knowledge and Perception of Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant agents among Dentists in Northern Jordan

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to describe the attitude and perception toward antiplatelet/anticoagulant agents in patients with cardiovascular diseases among dentists in the northern district of Jordan and to compare the current practice of Jordanian dentists and the recently published guidelines regarding the management of patients taking antiplatelet/anticoagulant drugs before dental procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study conducted on dentists and dental interns working at the dental clinics in northern Jordan, including dental clinics at Jordan University of Science and Technology (JUST) and the private sector. The total sample size comprised of 128 subjects (78 dentists from JUST and 50 private practitioners). The participants were interviewed using a preformed questionnaire to assess their knowledge and perceptions regarding the antiplatelets and the anticoagulant agents.

RESULTS

Approximately 61.5% of participants from JUST university and 20.0% of those in the private sector were aware of the use of clopidogrel (P < 0.0001). Although the overall awareness regarding other antiplatelets such as prasugrel was very low (8.6%), dentists from JUST (12.8%) showed a significantly higher level of awareness compared to the private practitioners (2.0%) (P = 0.049). More than 70% of the participants from JUST and only 46.0% of the private practitioners were aware of the consequences of interrupting treatment with clopidogrel in patients with coronary stents (P = 0.002). Almost both the participants from JUST (25.78%) and the private sector (24.22%) are consulting the cardiologists with similar frequencies before interrupting the treatment with the antiplatelet/anticoagulant agents. Participants who have clinical PhD qualifications are more aware of the recent clinical guidelines and the newest agents compared to others.

CONCLUSIONS

The awareness regarding the newest antiplatelet/anticoagulant agents is poor among the dentists in northern Jordan. However, the majority (62.3%) of them realize the consequences of interrupting such treatments in patients with coronary stents. Unfortunately, only a quarter of the dentists are consulting the cardiologists before interrupting the treatment with the antiplatelet agents. Proper education, courses, and workshops should be performed to the dentists to improve their knowledge about this critical issue.

Randomised controlled trial on vitreoretinal surgery with and without oral anticoagulants: surgical complications, visual results and perioperative thromboembolic events

BACKGROUND

Vitreoretinal surgery in anticoagulated patients is a challenging situation for vitreoretinal surgeons, who have to choose between being faced with the systemic thromboembolic risks that the interruption of anticoagulation involves, or the intra- and postoperative haemorrhagic risks associated with maintenance of this therapy. So far, no trial has compared, in a prospective and randomized manner, perioperative complications and the visual results associated with continuation or interruption of oral anticoagulant therapy before pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) under retrobulbar anaesthesia. The main objective of this trial is to compare haemostasis-related perioperative complications of PPV in patients maintaining anticoagulant therapy before surgery compared to patients with an interruption in this therapy before surgery.

METHODS

Ninety-six patients will be randomly assigned to either the control group, in whom oral anticoagulant therapy will be interrupted and substituted with subcutaneous heparin according to local clinical practice, or the intervention group in whom oral anticoagulant therapy will not be interrupted before surgery. Patients will be stratified according to the oral anticoagulant they were taking (direct or indirect anticoagulation). They will be followed up for 12 weeks, and the primary outcome, and haemorrhagic complications until 15 days after surgery, will be evaluated.

DISCUSSION

This trial will provide novel information on the possibility of continuing anticoagulant therapy during PPV. The benefits expected from the change in the current surgical management paradigm for anticoagulated patients would be a decreased risk in the incidence of perioperative thromboembolic events and the possibility of performing surgery without delay and without the need for patients to change their usual anticoagulation protocol to the more complex and less safe substitutive therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials Register EudraCT, 2018-000753-45. Registered on 11 November 2018.

[Complications with surgical treatment of basal cell carcinomas in individuals over 75 years of age: A retrospective study of prognostic factors in 158 cases]

INTRODUCTION

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is a pathology that evolves locally and it is common in elderly subjects whose frailty could restrict the indications for the reference treatment, which is based on surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the morbidity and the mortality associated with surgical treatment of BCC in patients over 75 years of age, so as to identify possible prognostic factors for postoperative complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study carried out with patients over 75 years of age who were treated surgically for one or several BCC between 2010 and 2015 in the reconstructive and cosmetic plastic surgery unit of the Saint-Louis Hospital in Paris (France). We collated the demographic characteristics, the characteristics of the treatment, as well as the rate of major postoperative complications. We performed a univariate and then a multivariate analysis of the various risk factors that were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 158 patients were analyzed and they exhibited a rate of major complications of 12%. The statistical analysis identified five significant risk factors: being over 85 years of age (P=0.006), long-term use of anticoagulant treatment (P=0.02), the presence of at least one comorbidity (P=0.018), a conventional hospitalization (P=0.002), and the use of general anesthesia (P=1.2e^-10).

CONCLUSION

Five risk factors for major postoperative complications with the surgical treatment of BCC in patients over 75 years of age were identified. These factors may provide direction to medico-surgical teams in regard to the optimal treatment of BCC in elderly patients.

Management of antithrombotic agents in patients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy

Bleeding is one of the most feared complications of flexible bronchoscopy. Although infrequent, it can be catastrophic and result in fatal outcomes. Compared to other endoscopic procedures, the risk of morbidity and mortality from the bleeding is increased, as even a small amount of blood can fill the tracheobronchial tree and lead to respiratory failure. Patients using antithrombotic agents (ATAs) have higher bleeding risk. A thorough understanding of the different ATAs is critical to manage patients during the peri-procedural period. A decision to stop an ATA before bronchoscopy should take into account a variety of factors, including indication for its use and the type of procedure. This article serves as a detailed review on the different ATAs, their pharmacokinetics and the pre- and post-bronchoscopy management of patients receiving these medications.

Evaluation of a Standardized Perioperative Management Protocol in the Adult Hematology Anticoagulation Management Service

BACKGROUND

In North America, 250,000 patients on vitamin K antagonists require surgical procedures each year. Temporary interruption of oral anticoagulation and perioperative bridging therapy with unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin are recommended by the American College of Chest Physicians 2012 for select patients.

OBJECTIVES

The study objectives are to evaluate adherence and nonadherence to the Johns Hopkins clinic guidelines for perioperative management of anticoagulation and identify bleeding or thromboembolic events during perioperative management of anticoagulation.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients who required perioperative management of anticoagulation for an invasive procedure from May 2009 to March 2014. Individualized perioperative anticoagulation management plans were prospectively developed for each patient according to the standardized Johns Hopkins perioperative bridging recommendations and documented in the medical record. Adherence to these standardized Johns Hopkins clinic guidelines, the incidence of thromboembolic events, and bleeding and adverse events during perioperative management were retrieved from the medical record.

RESULTS

In 294 perioperative management cases, there was 1 (0.3%) thromboembolism, 3 (1%) major bleeds, and 21 (7%) minor bleeds. One patient experienced facial swelling after starting enoxaparin. There was no difference in thromboembolic (0 vs 1, P = 1.00), major (1 vs 2, P = 1.00), or minor bleeding (14 vs 7, P = 1.00) events in patients managed by providers who were adherent to guidelines when compared with providers who were nonadherent.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that using a standardized guideline for perioperative management of anticoagulation to inform but not to dictate clinical practice leads to low rates of both thromboembolism and bleeding.

Perioperative Management of Neurological Conditions

Perioperative care of the patients with neurological diseases can be challenging. Most important consideration is the management and understanding of pathophysiology of these disorders and evaluation of new neurological changes that occur perioperatively. Perioperative generally refers to 3 phases of surgery: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative. We have tried to address few commonly encountered neurological conditions in clinical practice, such as delirium, stroke, epilepsy, myasthenia gravis, and Parkinson disease. In this article, we emphasize on early diagnosis and management strategies of neurological disorders in the perioperative period to minimize morbidity and mortality of patients.

Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism Considerations in Orthopedic Surgery

Patients undergoing orthopedic surgery have an increased risk for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). These complications are considered detrimental, as they cause major postoperative morbidity and mortality and lead to a substantial health care burden. Because of the high incidence and serious nature of these complications, it is essential for orthopedic surgeons to have a comprehensive knowledge of the risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment of acute DVT and PE. Perioperative management of orthopedic patients to prevent postoperative DVT and PE and optimize postoperative outcomes is also discussed in this review.

Results of surgery in general surgical patients receiving warfarin: retrospective analysis of 61 patients

The aim of this study is to investigate postoperative complications, mortality rates, and to determine the factors affecting mortality on the patients receiving warfarin therapy preoperatively, as well as comparing the results obtained from emergency and elective surgeries. Surgical outcomes of 61 patients on long-term oral anticoagulation with warfarin who underwent surgery in our center were retrospectively reviewed over an 8-year period. Thirty-three (54.1%) patients were female, with a mean age of 53 years. Mitral valve replacement (62.3%) was the most frequent indication for chronic anticoagulation therapy. Twelve out of 61 (19.2%) patients underwent emergency surgery; 59 (96.7%) operations were classified as major surgery. We did not observe any thromboembolic events on patients receiving our bridging therapy protocol. Cardiopulmonary dysfunction (CPD; 19.7%) and hemorrhage (16.4%) were the most encountered postoperative complications. Presence of CPD, bleeding, endocarditis, and mortality were statistically significant for emergency surgeries when compared with the results obtained from elective surgeries. There were 5 (8.2%) deaths observed during follow-up. It was found that advanced age, prolonged duration of operations, and presence of CPD had a statistically significant effect on mortality (P < 0.05). The patients receiving oral anticoagulant had high postoperative complication and mortality rates. This case was more evident in emergency surgeries. It is recommendable that as mortality is more apparent in the patients who undergo emergency surgeries-being older, having long duration of operations as well as CPD. Therefore during the postoperative follow-up process, the patients should be closely monitored.

Tonsillectomy in the Anticoagulated Patient

Objectives:

The objectives of this study were to review perioperative bridging strategies for anticoagulated patients and to describe a novel bridging strategy for tonsillectomy in an anticoagulated patient that addresses both primary and secondary hemorrhage risks.

Methods:

A literature review and a case report are presented. PubMed was reviewed for evidence-based recommendations on perioperative management of anticoagulated patients. A case report is detailed of a 28-year-old woman with antiphospholipid syndrome on warfarin for high risk of venous thrombosis who underwent tonsillectomy. A perioperative bridging strategy incorporating outpatient low–molecular weight heparin and inpatient unfractionated heparin was implemented to minimize risks of thrombosis and primary and secondary posttonsillectomy hemorrhage.

Results:

Limited evidence supports a consensus on the best perioperative management of anticoagulated patients. Tonsillectomy in an anticoagulated patient has not been described previously. The patient in this case underwent successful tonsillectomy with no thrombosis or bleeding after 1 month of follow-up.

Conclusions:

Tonsillectomy can be done relatively safely in an anticoagulated patient at high risk for thrombosis. The perioperative bridging strategy should account for its unique risk of primary and secondary postoperative hemorrhage. A proposed algorithm for managing these competing risks is presented.

Practical Guide to Direct New Oral Anticoagulant Use for Secondary Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation

OPINION STATEMENT

Anticoagulation remains the optimal treatment choice for secondary stroke prevention of AF. The vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have been the choice of treatment for the last 60 years, but the new oral anticoagulants are now a safe option for treatment of non-valvular AF (NVAF) in the right patient population, taking into account age, renal function, bleeding risk, cardiovascular comorbidities, cost, and drug interactions.

Bridging Anticoagulation: Primum Non Nocere

Chronic oral anticoagulation frequently requires interruption for various reasons and durations. Whether or not to bridge with heparin or other anticoagulants is a common clinical dilemma. The evidence to inform decision making is limited, making current guidelines equivocal and imprecise. Moreover, indications for anticoagulation interruption may be unclear. New observational studies and a recent large randomized trial have noted significant perioperative or periprocedural bleeding rates without reduction in thromboembolism when bridging is employed. Such bleeding may also increase morbidity and mortality. In light of these findings, physician preferences for routine bridging anticoagulation during chronic anticoagulation interruptions may be too aggressive. More randomized trials, such as PERIOP2 (A Double Blind Randomized Control Trial of Post-Operative Low Molecular Weight Heparin Bridging Therapy Versus Placebo Bridging Therapy for Patients Who Are at High Risk for Arterial Thromboembolism), will help guide periprocedural management of anticoagulation for indications such as venous thromboembolism and mechanical heart valves. In the meantime, physicians should carefully consider both the need for oral anticoagulation interruption and the practice of routine bridging when anticoagulation interruption is indicated.

Management of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in the perioperative setting

The field of oral anticoagulation has evolved with the arrival of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) including an anti-IIa agent (dabigatran etexilate) and anti-Xa agents (rivaroxaban and apixaban). The main specificities of these drugs are predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics but special attention should be paid in the elderly, in case of renal dysfunction and in case of emergency. In addition, their perioperative management is challenging, especially with the absence of specific antidotes. Effectively, periods of interruption before surgery or invasive procedures depend on half-life and keeping a permanent balance between bleeding and thromboembolic risks. In addition, few data regarding the link between plasma concentrations and their effects are provided. Routine laboratory tests are altered by NOACs and quantitative measurements are not widely performed. This paper provides a review on the management of NOACs in the perioperative setting, including the estimation of the bleeding and thrombotic risk, the periods of interruption, the indication of heparin bridging, the usefulness of laboratory tests before surgery or invasive procedure, and the time of resuming. Most data are based on expert's opinions.

The preoperative neurological evaluation

Neurological diseases are prevalent in the general population, and the neurohospitalist has an important role to play in the preoperative planning for patients with and at risk for developing neurological disease. The neurohospitalist can provide patients and their families as well as anesthesiologists, surgeons, hospitalists, and other providers guidance in particular to the patient's neurological disease and those he or she is at risk for. Here we present considerations and guidance for the neurohospitalist providing preoperative consultation for the neurological patient with or at risk of disturbances of consciousness, cerebrovascular and carotid disease, epilepsy, neuromuscular disease, and Parkinson disease.

Paradigm change in the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer of the auricle: reconstruction with full thickness skin grafting instead of wedge excision

Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) has become an epidemic disease and is predominantly located in the head and neck area. While historically auricular NMSCs are treated by means of a wedge excision, we describe a more elegant technique with excellent esthetical results. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 43 consecutive patients with NMSC of the auricle who underwent reconstruction with a full thickness skin graft (FTSG). All grafts survived. Two patients (5%) showed crust formation, but fully recovered. One patient had an irradical resection for which he required a limited re-excision. All patients showed excellent esthetical results. When treating NMSC of the auricle, reconstruction with a FTSG demonstrates several important advantages. It is a relatively simple but oncological safe technique; it leads to excellent esthetical and functional outcomes, and shows high patient and surgeon satisfaction.

Bleeding complications in patients with coronary stents during non-cardiac surgery

INTRODUCTION

Patients with coronary stents often undergo non-cardiac invasive procedures. These are often associated with thrombotic and/or hemorrhagic complications. The type of procedure, perioperative antiplatelet therapy, and other patient-related factors influence the risk of postoperative haemorrhage. Our objective was to analyze the postoperative risk factors for hemorrhagic complications and to determine the impact of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy strategies on postoperative bleeding risk in patients with coronary stents undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective, multicentre observational cohort study of 1134 consecutive patients with coronary stents undergoing non-cardiac surgery between April 2007 and April 2009. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of an hemorrhagic complication during the first 30days following the surgery or intervention.

RESULTS

Among the 1134 patients evaluated, 108 (9.5%) experienced a postoperative hemorrhagic complication (with a median time to occurrence of 5.3days). These complications were considered major, involved the operative site, and required reoperation in 92 (85.2%), 92 (85.2%), and 20 (18.5%) of patients, respectively. Mortality in patients with a haemorrhagic complication was 12% (n=13). Independent postoperative factors associated with haemorrhagic complications were identified as a high and intermediate bleeding risk procedure and the use and dose of anticoagulants. When interrupted before the procedure, resumption of antiplatelet treatment was delayed in patients developing early postoperative hemorrhagic complications.

CONCLUSION

Patients with coronary stents who undergo surgery are at high risk for hemorrhagic complications.

How to manage prasugrel and ticagrelor in daily practice

Prasugrel and ticagrelor are next-generation antiplatelet agents that provide a rapider and more potent inhibition of platelet P2Y12 receptor than clopidogrel. In combination with aspirin, these new P2Y12 inhibitors are now the first line treatments for patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, these potent antiplatelet agents introduce a new paradigm in the daily management of antithrombotic drugs, particularly when an invasive procedure is planned. The pharmacology of these antiplatelet agents, and the results of the main clinical trials, are reviewed with a special focus on good prescription practices (indications, contra-indications, drug interactions), and on peri-operative management. Strategies are proposed for safely reducing the bleeding risk in elderly patients, in patients requiring concomitant oral anticoagulant therapy, or in patients with an increased haemorrhagic risk.

Thromboprophylaxis and bleeding diathesis in minimally invasive stone surgery

With populations ageing and active treatment of urinary stones increasingly in demand, more patients with stones are presenting with an underlying bleeding disorder or need for regular thromboprophylaxis, by means of antiplatelet and other medication. A practical guide to thromboprophylaxis in the treatment of urinary tract lithiasis has not yet been established. Patients can be stratified according to levels of risk of arterial and venous thromboembolism, which influence the requirements for antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications, respectively. Patients should also be stratified according to their risk of bleeding. Consideration of the combined risks of bleeding and thromboembolism should determine the perioperative thromboprophylactic strategy. The choice of shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy or ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy for treatment of lithiasis should be determined with regard to these risks. Although ureteroscopy is the preferred method in high-risk patients, shockwave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy can be chosen when indicated, if appropriate guidelines are strictly followed.

An evidence-based warfarin management protocol reduces surgical delay in hip fracture patients

Background

Up to 4 % of patients presenting with a hip fracture may be on warfarin at admission. There is little consensus on the timing, dosage or route of vitamin K administration. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a locally developed, evidence-based protocol for perioperative warfarin management on the admission-to-operation time (AOT) in hip fracture patients.

Materials and methods

Clinical and demographic data were collected prospectively for hip fracture patients who were on warfarin at the time of admission (post-protocol group) and compared to a historical control group of patients who were on warfarin before implementation of the protocol (pre-protocol group). Univariate analysis was undertaken to identify any significant differences between the two groups.

Results

Twenty-seven patients in the pre-protocol group (27/616, 4.4 %) and 40 patients in the post-protocol group (4.7 %, 40/855) were on warfarin at admission. There was a significant reduction in the median AOT from 73 h (IQR 46–105) to 37.7 h (IQR 28–45) after implementation of the warfarin protocol (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients operated on within 48 h of admission increased from 30 % (8/27) in the pre-protocol group to 80 % (32/40) in the post-protocol group (p < 0.001). No significant differences in hospital length of stay (p = 0.77) or the postoperative warfarin recommencement time (p = 0.90) were noted between the two groups.

Conclusion

Implementation of a perioperative warfarin management protocol can expedite surgery in hip fracture patients, but did not reduce hospital stay in our cohort, possibly because of a delay in recommencing warfarin in these patients postoperatively.

Level of evidence

Level III.

Does chronic warfarin cause increased blood loss and transfusion during lumbar spinal surgery?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The use of oral anticoagulation therapy such as warfarin is projected to increase significantly as the population ages and the prevalence of cardiovascular disease increases. Current recommendations state that warfarin be discontinued before surgery and the international normalized ratio (INR) normalized.

PURPOSE

To determine if stopping warfarin 7 days before surgery and correcting INR had any effect on intraoperative blood loss or the requirements for blood product transfusion.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This was a retrospective cohort study in a high-volume tertiary care center.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Sample comprised 263 consecutive patients who underwent elective lumbar spinal surgery.

OUTCOME MEASURE

The outcome measures were intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion, postoperative blood transfusion, and the number of blood products transfused.

METHODS

The records of patients undergoing elective spinal surgery were analyzed for patient demographic data, comorbidities, coagulation panel laboratory findings, operative characteristics, blood loss, and blood transfusion requirements. These included patients undergoing full laminectomies with or without posterolateral fusion and instrumentation. Patients on warfarin were analyzed for the mean dosage of warfarin and underlying pathology that required anticoagulation. All patients on warfarin had their anticoagulation therapy stopped 7 days before surgery and their INR checked preoperatively to confirm normalization. Both univariate and multiple linear regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The patients on warfarin had a mean intraoperative blood loss of 839 mL compared with 441 mL for patients not on warfarin (p<.01). Multiple regression analysis determined that warfarin and number of spinal levels decompressed/fused/instrumented were predictors for increased blood loss (R(2)=0.37). Patients on warfarin also had increased postoperative blood transfusions (23.1% compared with 7.4%, p=.04). There was no significant difference between groups in terms of intraoperative blood transfusion or number of units transfused.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients on chronic anticoagulation therapy with warfarin who have their therapy stopped 7 days before surgery and have their INR normalized still demonstrated increased intraoperative blood loss and requirement for postoperative transfusion. Surgeons should be aware of the increased propensity of these patients to bleed despite adherence to protocols and should attempt to mitigate this risk.

Carotid revascularization in patients with ongoing oral anticoagulant therapy: the advantages of stent placement

PURPOSE

To assess the influence of oral anticoagulant therapy conversion to heparin (OAT-CH) on carotid endarterectomy (CEA) outcomes and the influence of unmodified oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) on carotid artery stenting (CAS) and to compare the outcomes of CEA in OAT-CH with CAS in ongoing OAT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The 30-day results from all patients who underwent CEA and CAS in a 6-year period were analyzed for stroke, death, myocardial infarction (MI), and hematoma of the access site requiring surgical evacuation. We evaluated the influence of OAT-CH in CEA and the influence of OAT in CAS and compared CEA and CAS outcomes in patients receiving OAT-CH and OAT.

RESULTS

Among 1,222 carotid revascularizations, there were 711 CEAs (58.1%) and 511 CAS procedures (41.9%). In the CEA group, 31 (4.4%) patients were treated with OAT-CH, and these patients had a significantly higher complication rate compared with patients not receiving OAT, including death (1 [3.2%] vs 4 [0.6%]; P = .04), stroke (4 [12.9%] vs 10 [1.4%]; P = .001), and hematoma (3 [9.6%] vs 11 [1.6%]; P = .02). In CAS, the results were similar in patients receiving OAT (30 [5.8%]) and patients not receiving OAT. Patients receiving OAT who underwent CAS had better outcomes than patients receiving OAT-CH who underwent CEA, including stroke, death, MI, and hematoma combined (0 [0.0%] vs 7 [22.5%]; P =.01).

CONCLUSIONS

OAT management significantly influences the results of carotid revascularization. Because CAS with unmodified OAT had a significantly better outcome than CEA with OAT-CH, carotid revascularization strategies should favor CAS rather than CEA in this setting.

Effects of post biopsy digital rectal compression on improving prostate cancer staging using magnetic resonance imaging in localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of digital rectal-compression immediately after transrectal prostate biopsy (P-bx) for improving the accuracy of prostate cancer (PCa) staging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between July 2008 and June 2010, 94 consecutive patients who had a radical prostatectomy were included in our retrospective analysis. The exclusion criteria included a history of previous P-bx and surgery, a biopsy performed in another hospital, a number of biopsy cores different from 12, or a condition interfering with bleeding assessment. The subjects were divided into two groups, compression and non-compression. All enrolled patients took magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for PCa staging.

RESULTS

The compression and non-compression groups were comparable with respect to several baseline characteristics. However, the total hemorrhage score of intraprostatic bleeding was significantly different between the groups, even with adjustment for the time from biopsy to MRI (compression:15.4 ± 2.32, non-compression: 24.9 ± 2.43, p<0.001). The intra-prostatic cancer location matching rate was higher in the compression group (78.0%) than in the non-compression group (70.2%) (p = 0.011). Overall accuracy of staging in compression and non-compression groups was 84.7% and 77.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that digital rectal compression performed immediately after prostate biopsy to reduce intraprostatic hemorrhage improves the accuracy for detection of PCa using MRI.

Perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND

This guideline addresses the management of patients who are receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy and require an elective surgery or procedure.

METHODS

The methods herein follow those discussed in the Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines. Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines article of this supplement.

RESULTS

In patients requiring vitamin K antagonist (VKA) interruption before surgery, we recommend stopping VKAs 5 days before surgery instead of a shorter time before surgery (Grade 1B). In patients with a mechanical heart valve, atrial fibrillation, or VTE at high risk for thromboembolism, we suggest bridging anticoagulation instead of no bridging during VKA interruption (Grade 2C); in patients at low risk, we suggest no bridging instead of bridging (Grade 2C). In patients who require a dental procedure, we suggest continuing VKAs with an oral prohemostatic agent or stopping VKAs 2 to 3 days before the procedure instead of alternative strategies (Grade 2C). In moderate- to high-risk patients who are receiving acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and require noncardiac surgery, we suggest continuing ASA around the time of surgery instead of stopping ASA 7 to 10 days before surgery (Grade 2C). In patients with a coronary stent who require surgery, we recommend deferring surgery > 6 weeks after bare-metal stent placement and > 6 months after drug-eluting stent placement instead of undertaking surgery within these time periods (Grade 1C); in patients requiring surgery within 6 weeks of bare-metal stent placement or within 6 months of drug-eluting stent placement, we suggest continuing antiplatelet therapy perioperatively instead of stopping therapy 7 to 10 days before surgery (Grade 2C).

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative antithrombotic management is based on risk assessment for thromboembolism and bleeding, and recommended approaches aim to simplify patient management and minimize adverse clinical outcomes.

Coronary stent management in elective genitourinary surgery

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Withdrawal of dual antiplatelet therapy before the recommended, 12 months for drug-eluting stents and 1 month for bare-metal stents increases the rate of major adverse coronary events and mortality. However, in those undergoing surgery the risk of bleeding is increased substantially for those on antiplatelet agents. Successful management in patients with coronary stents who must undergo elective or non-elective urological surgery should be a multidisciplinary decision. This article reviews the literature and recommends a protocol for clinical management of patients undergoing urological procedures after coronary stent placement. To review the literature on coronary stents and genitourinary surgery and provide a protocol for perioperative. The keywords, 'elective surgery', 'aspirin', 'clopidogrel', 'guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention', and 'antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent placement' were used to search PubMed for any relevant articles relating to coronary stents. Recommendations were made based on the whether the procedures patients were exposed to placed them at low-, moderate- or high-bleeding risk based on the extent of the procedure. All elective procedures should be delayed for 1 month after bare-metal stent placement and 1 year after drug-eluting stent placement. In patients classified as low risk (endoscopy and laser prostatectomy), aspirin should be continued throughout the perioperative period and dual antiplatelet therapy should continue 24-48 h postoperatively, if there is no concern for active bleeding. In those classified as moderate risk (scrotal procedures, transurethral resection of bladder tumours, transurethral resection of the prostate, urinary sphincter placement) dual antiplatelet therapy should be discontinued 5-7 days before the procedure and continued within 7 days after procedure, if there is no concern for active bleeding, in consultation with cardiology. In high-risk procedures (cystectomy, nephrectomy, prostatectomy, penile prosthesis placement) dual antiplatelet therapy should be discontinued 10 days before the procedure and continued postoperatively within 7-10 days of the procedure, when there is no longer a concern for active bleeding with the assistance of a cardiologist. Coronary artery disease is becoming more prominent in our society, increasing the use of coronary stents and antiplatelet agents. With the proposed protocol, it is safe to proceed with surgical intervention in those that have adequate stent endothelialisation.

Bleeding incidence after oral surgery with continued oral anticoagulation

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the incidence of postoperative hemorrhage in patients treated with coumarins without interruption of the anticoagulant treatment undergoing oral surgical procedures, mostly osteotomies for tooth removal, when compared with patients who had never been anticoagulated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Six hundred thirty-seven patients underwent 934 oral surgical procedures on an outpatient basis. The INR was measured preoperatively being 2.44 in the mean SD 0.61. Local hemostasis was carried out routinely (80%) with collagen fleece, local flap, and acrylic splint.

RESULTS

Of these 637 patients, 47 presented with a postoperative hemorrhage (7.4%), 15 of these 47 cases had to be treated in hospital (2.4%). All patients showed up finally with a good wound healing, no administration of blood was necessary, and local measures revealed to be sufficient in all cases except for two patients, where the preoperative anticoagulant treatment had to be changed for 6 days. The bleeding incidence in 285 patients with comparable oral surgical procedures, who had never been anticoagulated, was 0.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that oral surgical procedures can be performed safely without alteration of the oral anticoagulant treatment. CINICAL RELEVANCE: Local hemostasis with collagen fleece, local flap, and acrylic splint seems to be sufficient to prevent postoperative bleeding.

Effect of Prostate Biopsy Hemorrhage on MRDW and MRS Imaging

Purpose

To retrospectively evaluate the effect of post-prostate-biopsy hemorrhage on the interpretation of magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted (MRDW) and magnetic resonance spectroscopic (MRS) imaging in the detection of prostate cancer. We also investigated the optimal timing for magnetic resonance examination after prostate biopsy.

Materials and Methods

We reviewed the records of 135 men. All patients underwent prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The prostate was divided into eight regions according to the biopsy site. Subsequently, we measured hemorrhage on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and (choline+creatinine)/citrate ([Cho+Cr]/Cit) ratios in the same regions on the MRI. We investigated the effect of hemorrhage at ADC values and (Cho+Cr)/Cit ratios on MRI and the relationship between prostate biopsy results and MRI findings.

Results

The mean patient age was 68.7 years and the mean time between biopsy and MRI was 23.5 days. The total hemorrhagic score demonstrated no significant associations with intervals from biopsy to MRI. Higher hemorrhagic scores were associated with higher ADC values, prostate cancer, and noncancer groups, respectively (p<0.001). ADC values were lower in tumors than in normal tissue (p<0.001), and ADC values were inversely correlated with tumor Gleason score in biopsy cores (p<0.001). However, (Cho+Cr)/Cit ratios did not exhibit any association with prostate biopsy results and hemorrhage.

Conclusions

Hemorrhage had no significant associations with the interval from biopsy to MRI. ADC values may help to detect prostate cancer and predict the aggressiveness of cancer; however, it is important to consider the bias effect of hemorrhage on the interpretation of MRDW imaging given that hemorrhage affects ADC values.

Focus on perioperative management of anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents in spine surgery

Perioperative management of anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents is based on a compromise between the risk of hemorrhage induced by maintaining (or substituting for) them and the risk of thrombosis if they are discontinued. The hemorrhage risk in major spinal surgery is clear (50-81% incidence of transfusion), and the incidence of postoperative symptomatic spinal hematoma varies between 0.4% and 0.2% depending on whether low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is prescribed postoperatively. The French Health Authority, in 2008, published guidelines on the management of patients treated with vitamin K antagonists. Treatment may be stopped without preoperative replacement in certain cases of atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolic disease; otherwise, preoperative replacement by curative dose unfractionated heparin (UFH) or LMWH is recommended, with withdrawal early enough to avoid peroperative bleeding. Postoperative care should take account of hemorrhagic risk following surgery. The management of patients treated with antiplatelets is delicate, as maintenance is preferable in most of the situations in which they are prescribed (bare or active stenting, or secondary prevention of myocardial infarction, stroke or peripheral ischemia), although they are liable to increase the risk of perioperative hemorrhage, especially when associated to antithrombotic prophylaxis. If surgery cannot be performed under treatment continuation, the interruption should be as short as possible. New guidelines are presently being drawn up under the auspices of the French Health Authority. In both types of treatment, the strategy should be jointly determined by surgeon, anesthesiologist and cardiologist, to optimize individualized care taking account of each party's requirements, with the patient in the central role. The selected strategy should be clearly stated in the patient's file.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.