Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis of a patient with MYH-9 related disease and COVID-19 infection: A case report

BACKGROUND

The May-Hegglin anomaly is among a group of genetic disorders known as MYH9-related disease. Patients with inherited platelet disorders such as May-Hegglin anomaly are at a variably increased risk for bleeding due to a com-bination of platelet dysfunction and thrombocytopenia. Patients admitted to the hospital with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection are at an increased risk for a venous thromboembolism event (VTE). The National Institutes of Health COVID-19 treatment guidelines recommend using a prophylactic dose of heparin as VTE prophylaxis for adults who are receiving high-flow oxygen. We describe a patient admitted for COVID-19 infection with pneumonia and a history of May-Hegglin anomaly. The patient presented a challenge to determine prophylactic anticoagulation as there are no clear guidelines for this patient population.

CASE SUMMARY

Herein, we describe the case of a 39-year-old woman admitted with acute hypoxic respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 pneumonia. She had a history of May-Hegglin anomaly and demonstrated risk for bleeding since childhood, including a life-threatening bleeding event at the age of 9 years requiring blood and platelet transfusions. Her baseline platelet count was 40-50 × 10⁹/L throughout her adult life. Her family history was also notable for May-Hegglin disorder in her mother, maternal uncle, maternal grandfather and her son. Computed tomography/ pulmonary angiography revealed bilateral consolidative opacities consistent with multifocal pneumonia. Complete blood count was notable for platelet count of 54 × 10⁹/L. She was admitted for inpatient respiratory support with high-flow oxygen per nasal cannula and was managed with guideline-directed therapy for COVID-19, including baricitinib and dexamethasone. The Hematology/Oncology consultation team was requested to assist with management of VTE prophylaxis in the setting of active COVID-19 infection and an inherited bleeding disorder. After review of the literature and careful consideration of risks and benefits, it was decided to treat the patient with prophylactic enoxaparin. She was closely monitored in the hospital for bleeding and worsening thrombocytopenia. She had no bleeding or signs of VTE. Her respiratory status improved, and she was discharged home after 5 d of hospitalization with supplemental oxygen by nasal cannula and dexamethasone. At the 6-month follow-up, the patient successfully discontinued her home oxygen use after only a few weeks following discharge.

CONCLUSION

The patient presented a challenge to determine prophylactic anticoagulation as anticoagulation guidelines exist for patients with COVID-19, but there are no clear guidelines for management of patients with COVID-19 and inherited bleeding disorders, particularly those with MYH9- related disease. She was discharged after recovery from the COVID-19 infection without bleeding or thrombosis. As there are no published guidelines for this situation, we present a pragmatic, informed approach to a patient with MYH9-related disease who had an indication for anticoagulation.

Markedly increased risk of postoperative bleeding complications during perioperative bridging anticoagulation in general and visceral surgery

BACKGROUND

Increasing numbers of patients receiving oral anticoagulants are undergoing elective surgery. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is frequently applied as bridging therapy during perioperative interruption of anticoagulation. The aim of this study was to explore the postoperative bleeding risk of patients receiving surgery under bridging anticoagulation.

METHODS

We performed a monocentric retrospective two-arm matched cohort study. Patients that received perioperative bridging anticoagulation were compared to a matched control group with identical surgical procedure, age, and sex. Emergency and vascular operations were excluded. The primary endpoint was the incidence of major postoperative bleeding. Secondary endpoints were minor postoperative bleeding, thromboembolic events, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. Multivariate analysis explored risk factors of major postoperative bleeding.

RESULTS

A total of 263 patients in each study arm were analyzed. The patient cohort included the entire field of general and visceral surgery including a large proportion of major oncological resections. Bridging anticoagulation increased the postoperative incidence of major bleeding events (8% vs. 1%; p < 0.001) as well as minor bleeding events (14% vs. 5%; p < 0.001). Thromboembolic events were equally rare in both groups (1% vs. 2%; p = 0.45). No effect on mortality was observed (1.5% vs. 1.9%). Independent risk factors of major postoperative bleeding were full-therapeutic dose of LMWH, renal insufficiency, and the procedure-specific bleeding risk.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative bridging anticoagulation, especially full-therapeutic dose LMWH, markedly increases the risk of postoperative bleeding complications in general and visceral surgery. Surgeons should carefully consider the practice of routine bridging.

Aspirin and the prevention of venous thromboembolism following total joint arthroplasty: commonly asked questions

The number of arthroplasties being performed increases each year. Patients undergoing an arthroplasty are at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and appropriate prophylaxis has been recommended. However, the optimal protocol and the best agent to minimise VTE under these circumstances are not known. Although many agents may be used, there is a difference in their efficacy and the risk of bleeding. Thus, the selection of a particular agent relies on the balance between the desire to minimise VTE and the attempt to reduce the risk of bleeding, with its undesirable, and occasionally fatal, consequences.

Acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) is an agent for VTE prophylaxis following arthroplasty. Many studies have shown its efficacy in minimising VTE under these circumstances. It is inexpensive and well-tolerated, and its use does not require routine blood tests. It is also a ‘milder’ agent and unlikely to result in haematoma formation, which may increase both the risk of infection and the need for further surgery. Aspirin is also unlikely to result in persistent wound drainage, which has been shown to be associated with the use of agents such as low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and other more aggressive agents.

The main objective of this review was to summarise the current evidence relating to the efficacy of aspirin as a VTE prophylaxis following arthroplasty, and to address some of the common questions about its use.

There is convincing evidence that, taking all factors into account, aspirin is an effective, inexpensive, and safe form of VTE following arthroplasty in patients without a major risk factor for VTE, such as previous VTE.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1420–30.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in a non-heparin-naive patient: a case report

Introduction

Administration of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing hip surgery. In this context, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II is a complication of rare incidence but sometimes fatal outcome.

Case description

A 52-year old obese patient undergoing antithrombotic therapy with Enoxaparin after hip surgery presented with a painful, swollen leg and thrombocytopenia on day eight after surgery. Medical history showed previous administration of Enoxaparin without complications 2 years ago. Further diagnostic investigation supplied evidence of multiple thromboembolic events and concomitant compartment syndrome. Administration of Enoxaparin was stopped immediately and treatment with Argatroban was initiated. Diagnosis of HIT was confirmed according to current guidelines. Despite interventional thrombectomy and fasciotomy, amputation of both lower limbs had to be performed due to ongoing necroses. After a 30-days-stay at the intensive care unit because of sepsis, respiratory and renal failure, clinical condition improved and the patient could be transferred for rehabilitation.

Discussion and evaluation

HIT II is known as complication of administration of LMWH in the perioperative setting. Diagnosis results from clinical findings and platelet count. Argatroban is recommended as an alternative therapeutic anticoagulant in HIT II. Inflammation and surgical trauma are discussed as priming factors to increase risk of HIT II.

Conclusions

Administration of LMWH may result in HIT II despite prior uneventful drug exposure. Except for immediate diagnosis, only consequent anticoagulation can stop the course of disease. Hence, interdisciplinary awareness is inevitable for early diagnosis and accurate therapy to prevent from a catastrophic clinical course.