Thromboprophylaxis during chemotherapy after advanced cancer

Quality of Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Neuro-oncologic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Given the vagaries of published guidelines and the lack of high-quality evidence on the method, timing, and dose of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in neurological surgery, little is known about practice patterns regarding VTE prophylaxis in the United States.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the use of VTE prophylaxis in patients who underwent surgery for a cerebral neoplasm and to identify patient, physician, and hospital characteristics associated with prophylaxis.

METHODS

Using the Premier Perspective database, we classified patients undergoing surgery for intracranial neoplasm between 2006 and 2012 on the basis of the type of VTE prophylaxis they received (mechanical, pharmacological, or combination). Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze the effects of pretreatment patient and system variables, including hospital and surgeon volume, on prophylaxis while controlling for hospital clustering.

RESULTS

A total of 43 327 patients were identified. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis was given to 70.2% of patients. Overall, 16 957 (39.2%) had only mechanical prophylaxis, 5628 (13%) received only pharmacological prophylaxis, and 7826 (18.1%) received combination prophylaxis. Patients with high-volume providers (odds ratio, 2.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-3.69) were more likely to receive prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION

Nearly one-third of patients who underwent surgery for an intracranial tumor did not receive any VTE prophylaxis. We noted that the rate of overall VTE prophylaxis did not significantly change over the course of the 7 years analyzed despite an increasing focus on complication prevention. High-volume surgeons were more likely to provide VTE prophylaxis.

The potential of enzastaurin to enhance platelet aggregation and growth factor secretion: implications for cancer cell survival

BACKGROUND

Enzastaurin is a protein kinase C (PKC)β inhibitor with antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects that was in clinical development for the treatment of a variety of cancers. However, the primary endpoints in several clinical trials of enzastaurin were not met, and thrombosis was reported as an adverse effect in some trials. While investigating the role of PKC in regulating growth factor release from platelets, we found that, unlike other PKC inhibitors, enzastaurin may potentiate platelet aggregation.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of enzastaurin on platelet aggregation, growth factor secretion from α-granules and cancer cell apoptosis in the presence of platelets.

METHODS

Prostacyclin-washed platelets and platelet-rich plasma were isolated from the blood of healthy human volunteers. Platelet light-aggregometry was performed in the presence and absence of enzastaurin and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). P-selectin was measured by flow cytometry, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) release was measured by ELISA. A549 lung carcinoma cells were treated with releasates from enzastaurin-titrated platelets. A cell death ELISA was performed to measure A549 apoptosis.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Enzastaurin (10(-8) -10(-6)  m) potentiated aggregation of prostacyclin-washed platelets and caused an increase in VEGF release from α-granules that, in turn, promoted cancer cell survival. In platelet-rich plasma, 10(-6)  m enzastaurin inhibited platelet aggregation, but not 10(-7)  m enzastaurin, which also failed to suppress VEGF secretion. ASA abrogated enzastaurin-potentiated washed-platelet aggregation and VEGF release. These findings indicate that, at high plasma protein-free drug concentrations, enzastaurin potentiates platelet aggregation and growth factor secretion, an effect that may counteract its anticancer activity. ASA nullifies this effect.

Perioperative thromboprophylaxis in patients with craniotomy for brain tumours: a systematic review

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) events are frequent in neurooncological patients in perioperative period thus increasing mortality and morbidity. The role of prophylaxis has not yet been established with certainty, and in various neurosurgery and intensive care units the practice is inconsistent. A better definition of the risk/cost/benefit ratio of the various methods, both mechanical (intermittent pneumatic compression-IPC, graduated compression stockings-GCS) and pharmacological (unfractionated heparin-UFH or low molecular weight heparin-LMWH), is warranted. We aim to define the optimal prophylactic treatment in the perioperative period in neurooncological patients. A systematic review of the literature was performed in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library. Thirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified, in which physical methods (IPC or GCS) and/or drugs (UFH or LMWHs) were evaluated in perioperative prophylaxis of neurological patients, mostly with brain cancer not treated with anticoagulants for other diseases. The analysis was conducted on a total of 1,932 randomized patients of whom 1,558 had brain tumours. Overall data show a trend of reduction of VTE in patients treated with mechanical methods (IPC or GCS) that should be initiated preoperatively and continued until discharge or longer in case of persistence of risk factors. The addition of enoxaparin starting the day after surgery, significantly reduces clinically manifest VTE, despite an increase in major bleeding events. Further studies are needed to delineate the types of patients with an increase of VTE risk and risk/benefits ratio of physical and pharmacological treatments in the perioperative period.

Venous thromboembolism in malignant gliomas

Malignant gliomas are associated with a very high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). While many clinical risk factors have previously been described in brain tumor patients, the risk of VTE associated with newer anti-angiogenic therapies such as bevacizumab in these patients remains unclear. When VTE occurs in this patient population, concern regarding the potential for intracranial hemorrhage complicates management decisions regarding anticoagulation, and these patients have a worse prognosis than their VTE-free counterparts. Risk stratification models identifying patients at high risk of developing VTE along with predictive plasma biomarkers may guide the selection of eligible patients for primary prevention with pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. Recent studies exploring disordered coagulation, such as increased expression of tissue factor (TF), and tumorigenic molecular signaling may help to explain the increased risk of VTE in patients with malignant gliomas.