Structural interactions between viruses as a consequence of mixed infections

Replication of Plant Viruses

Viruses replicate using both their own genetic information and host cell components and machinery. The different genome types have different replication pathways which contain controls on linking the process with translation and movement around the cell as well as not compromising the infected cell. This chapter discusses the replication mechanisms, faults in replication and replication of viruses co-infecting cells.

Viruses replicate using both their own genetic information and host cell components and machinery. The different genome types have different replication pathways which contain controls on linking the process with translation and movement around the cell as well as not compromising the infected cell. This chapter discusses the replication mechanisms, faults in replication and replication of viruses coinfecting cells.

Ultrastructure of mixed plant virus infection: bean yellow mosaic virus with cowpea severe mosaic virus or cowpea mosaic virus in bean

Ultrastructural responses of bean leaf cells simultaneously infected with two morphologically distinct RNA viruses, cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) and bean yellow mosaic virus (BYMV), or cowpea severe mosaic virus (CSMV) and BYMV, were studied in situ. The major effects on cells infected with two viruses included: (1) association of virus group-specific cytoplasmic inclusions characteristic of each virus; (2) close association of virions into specifically arranged aggregates in which CPMV or CSMV icosahedra were aligned along the long axes of the BYMV rods; and (3) the induced formation of intranuclear inclusions, spheres (22-26 nm in diameter) and filaments (10-14 nm wide and of variable length) in mixed infections of CSMV and BYMV. Intracellular serological testing using ferritin conjugated with CSMV antibodies revealed no relationship between the spherical intranuclear inclusions and CSMV capsids. We conclude that the ultrastructure of mixed infections could be used as another tool for identifying related plant viruses.

Transcomplementation and synergism in plants: implications for viral transgenes?

In plants, viral synergisms occur when one virus enhances infection by a distinct or unrelated virus. Such synergisms may be unidirectional or mutualistic but, in either case, synergism implies that protein(s) from one virus can enhance infection by another. A mechanistically related phenomenon is transcomplementation, in which a viral protein, usually expressed from a transgene, enhances or supports the infection of a virus from a distinct species. To gain an insight into the characteristics and limitations of these helper functions of individual viral genes, and to assess their effects on the plant-pathogen relationship, reports of successful synergism and transcomplementation were compiled from the peer-reviewed literature and combined with data from successful viral gene exchange experiments. Results from these experiments were tabulated to highlight the phylogenetic relationship between the helper and dependent viruses and, where possible, to identify the protein responsible for the altered infection process. The analysis of more than 150 publications, each containing one or more reports of successful exchanges, transcomplementation or synergism, revealed the following: (i) diverse viral traits can be enhanced by synergism and transcomplementation; these include the expansion of host range, acquisition of mechanical transmission, enhanced specific infectivity, enhanced cell-to-cell and long-distance movement, elevated or novel vector transmission, elevated viral titre and enhanced seed transmission; (ii) transcomplementation and synergism are mediated by many viral proteins, including inhibitors of gene silencing, replicases, coat proteins and movement proteins; (iii) although more frequent between closely related viruses, transcomplementation and synergism can occur between viruses that are phylogenetically highly divergent. As indicators of the interoperability of viral genes, these results are of general interest, but they can also be applied to the risk assessment of transgenic crops expressing viral proteins. In particular, they can contribute to the identification of potential hazards, and can be used to identify data gaps and limitations in predicting the likelihood of transgene-mediated transcomplementation.

Genome packaging by spherical plant RNA viruses

The majority of positive-strand RNA viruses of plants replicate and selectively encapsidate their progeny genomes into stable virions in cytoplasmic compartments of the cell where the opportunity to copackage cellular RNA also exists. Remarkably, highly purified infectious virions contain almost exclusively viral RNA, suggesting that mechanisms exist to regulate preferential packaging of viral genomes. The general principle that governs RNA packaging is an interaction between the structural CP and a specific RNA signal. Mechanisms that enhance selective packaging of viral genomes and formation of infectious virions may involve factors other than CP and nucleic acid sequences. The possible involvement of replicase proteins is an example. Our knowledge concerning genome packaging among spherical plant RNA viruses is still maturing. The main focus of this review is to discuss factors that have limited progress and to evaluate recent technical breakthroughs likely to help unravel the mechanism of RNA packaging among viruses of agronomic importance. A key breakthrough is the development of in vivo systems and comparisons with results obtained in vitro.

Complementation of the host range restriction of southern cowpea mosaic virus in bean by southern bean mosaic virus

Vigna unguiculata (cowpea) and Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean) are permissive hosts for southern cowpea mosaic virus (SCPMV) and southern bean mosaic virus (SBMV), respectively. Neither of these two sobemoviruses systemically infects the permissive host of the other. Although bean cells are permissive for SCPMV RNA synthesis, they do not support the assembly of this virus. Thus, the host range restriction of SCPMV in bean may occur at the level of movement and may involve the inability of SCPMV to assemble in this host. In this study, it was demonstrated that SCPMV accumulates in an encapsidated form in the inoculated and systemic leaves of bean plants following coinoculation with SBMV. No evidence was observed that the SCPMV that accumulated in coinoculated bean plants had an altered host range relative to wild-type SCPMV. These results suggested that SBMV complemented the host range restriction of SCPMV in bean. Additional experiments demonstrated that cowpea protoplasts are permissive for SBMV RNA synthesis and assembly. It was concluded from these results that the host range restriction of SBMV in cowpea occurs at the level of movement. In mixed infections of cowpea with SCPMV and SBMV, the latter was recovered from the inoculated but not the systemic leaves. Its recovery from the inoculated leaves, however, was not dependent on the presence of SCPMV in the inoculum. From these results, it was concluded that SCPMV did not complement the host range restriction of SBMV in cowpea.

Vaccination against Marek's disease and infectious bursal disease. I. Development of a bivalent live vaccine by co-cultivating turkey herpesvirus and infectious bursal disease vaccine viruses in chicken embryo fibroblast monolayers

Vaccine viruses of Marek's disease (MD), the FC-126 strain of the herpesvirus of turkeys (HVT), and infectious bursal disease (IBD), the Bursa-Vac-M strain of IBD virus (IBDV), were propagated in the same chicken embryo fibroblast (CEF) monolayers by superinfection. Co-infection of the two viruses in the same CEF culture or in a single cell can be demonstrated by staining with acridine orange and by electron microscopy.l This study was conducted with a superinfected live bivalent vaccine (HVT/IBDV) in one-day-old specific pathogen-free (SPF) and conventional White Leghorn (CWL) chicks. Chickens vaccinated with HVT/IBDV produced persistent HVT viremia for at least 6 weeks postvaccination; significantly higher IBD virus neutralizing antibody levels were observed for the entire 8-week experimental period when compared to unvaccinated controls. Differences between virus neutralizing antibody titers stimulated by HVT/IBDV and IBDV alone were not statistically significant in SPF chickens; however, due to maternal antibody there were some significant differences in CWL chickens. Both the HVT/IBDV bivalent vaccine and the monovalent IBDV vaccine protected the chickens against challenge with virulent IBDV. Based on microscopic lesions and bursa: body weight indexes, challenge of vaccinated chickens with virulent IBDV caused no atrophy in the bursa of Fabricius, but severe tissue destruction was observed in unvaccinated challenged controls. Chickens vaccinated with HVT/IBDV vaccine or with HVT alone were effectively protected against MD when compared to the controls.

Experimental mixed CNS infections in mice caused by three Ixodes ricinus transmitted Arboviruses

Approximately 12-day-old mice were infected intracerebrally with tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) virus (strain Hypr), Unkuniemi virus (strain By E50) and Tribec virus, as single virus inoculations, coinfections with two or three viruses, and sequential infections with two or three viruses at 24-hour intervals. The effect of mixed infections on mortality, morbidity and average survival time was recorded. The main findings were that: 1. Some mixed infections with TBE and UUK viruses reduced the mortality and acute morbidity significantly as compared to single infections with each virus. The average survival times were lengthened. 2. Mixed infections with TBE and Tribec did not affect the 100% mortality of TBE. 3. Mixed infections with UUK and Tribec seemed to result in a cumulative effect of the two viruses. 4. With triple co-infections (TBE + Tribec + UUK simultaneously), the mortality and acute morbidity rates were reduced significantly as compared to TBE single infections. 5. Some of the mixed infections tended to result in chronic disease among the survivors.

Mechanism of formation of pseudotypes between vesicular stomatitis virus and murine leukemia virus

Pseudotypes of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and Moloney murine leukemia virus (MuLV), defined by their resistance to neutralization by anti-VSV antiserum, are released preferentially at early times after infection of MuLV-producing cells with VSV. At later times, after synthesis of MuLV proteins has been inhibited by the VSV infection, neither MuLV virions nor the VSV (MuLV) pseudotypes are made. Infection of MuLV-producing cells with mutants of VSV having temperature-sensitive lesions in either G or M protein does not generate pseudotypes at nonpermissive temperature, indicating that both proteins are needed for pseudotypes to form. Although the pseudotypes resist neutralization by anti-VSV serum, they are inactivated by anti-VSV serum plus complement, and they can be precipitated by rabbit anti-VSV serum plus goat anti-rabbit IgG. These results, coupled with experiments using a temperature-sensitive mutant of VSV G protein grown at partly restrictive temperature, suggest that small numbers of VSV G protein are obligately incorporated into VSV(MuLV) pseudotypes. There appears to be a stringent requirement for recognition of the viral core by homologous envelope components as the nucleating step in the budding process. Only after such a nucleation can the envelope components of the second virus substitute into the membrane of the budding particle.