Instability of the homogeneous state as the source of localization, epigenesis, differentiation, and morphogenesis

The generation of the flower by self-organisation

The essence of the Turing-Child theory (Schiffmann, 1991, 2017) is the direct and spontaneous conversion of chemical energy into simultaneous differentiation and morphogenesis, and all localised biological work and localised entropy-reducing processes. This is done via the identification of the Turing instability with cAMP and ATP being the Turing morphogens that mutually fulfil the five Turing inequalities. A flower model like the ABC model is derived from experiments with mutations. But what actually generates the model in real development? That is, how do genes of class A come to be expressed in the sepal and petal whorls, genes of class B in the petal and stamen whorls, and genes of class C in the stamen and carpel whorls. We suggest that the generation of the ABC model occurs via sequential compartmentalisation by Turing-Child eigenfunction patterns similar to the one occurring in Drosophila (Schiffmann, 2012). We also suggest a similar mechanism for the generation of the dorso-lateral-ventral polarity and bilateral symmetry. A mechanism for the generation of the regular location of the floral organs is also suggested. The symmetry and regularity of flowers, which are the source of their attraction and beauty, stem from the symmetry and regularity of the Turing-Child eigenfunctions. The central problem in developmental biology is the endless regress. This endless regress is halted by the Turing-Child pre-patterns and this is illustrated on a central example in flower generation. Both the shape and the chemistry - the steady-state rate of ATP synthesis and hydrolysis - of the Turing-Child pre-patterns are exactly what is required. Art and science meet in flower formation.

Differential diffusivity of the Turing morphogens

The Turing morphogens cAMP and ATP are considered as electrolytes. Each is made of a slow anion and fast cation. The unequal diffusion of the of the cation and the anion creates an electric field which accelerates the anion and decelerates the cation. This effect is more pronounced for ATP than cAMP since ATP has higher charge and greater concentration than cAMP.

The non-equilibrium basis of Turing Instability and localised biological work

Turing's theory for biological pattern formation is based on the instability of the homogeneous state, which occurs if certain key criteria are met. The problem of how chemical energy is converted to localised biological work requires one to understand not only the basis of localised power generation, but also the age-old puzzle of how organisms decrease their entropy; these problems can only be solved by the identification of the Turing Instability. At the heart of this is how natural selection, not chemistry, has fashioned the large non-equilibrium overall affinity (ΔG is a large negative quantity) for the oxidation of the fuel molecules. Natural selection has also resulted in the homeostasis at non-equilibrium values of the hydrolysis of molecules like ATP, GTP, which are the energy links between the overall oxidation of the fuel and biological work. The conditions for such homeostasis are central requirements for the Turing Instability and are the essence of being alive. The Turing-Child (TC) patterns are the spontaneous primary spatial cause not only of localised biological work in multicellular systems (especially those in patterning and development) but also of intracellular patterns including the mitotic spindle and the contractile ring. The Turing picture comprises the nonuniform distribution of the concentrations of the Turing morphogens, cAMP and ATP, and the Child picture is the resulting nonuniform distribution of the metabolic rate and of power. The TC pattern is shaped as the dominant eigenfunction in the combination of eigenfunctions which provides the spatial pattern of the Turing morphogens. The TC patterns and the bifurcation parameter manifest quantisation and symmetry as in music and in applications of quantum mechanics. The notion of correlation diagrams is also introduced.

Morphogenetic fields in embryogenesis, regeneration, and cancer: non-local control of complex patterning

Establishment of shape during embryonic development, and the maintenance of shape against injury or tumorigenesis, requires constant coordination of cell behaviors toward the patterning needs of the host organism. Molecular cell biology and genetics have made great strides in understanding the mechanisms that regulate cell function. However, generalized rational control of shape is still largely beyond our current capabilities. Significant instructive signals function at long range to provide positional information and other cues to regulate organism-wide systems properties like anatomical polarity and size control. Is complex morphogenesis best understood as the emergent property of local cell interactions, or as the outcome of a computational process that is guided by a physically encoded map or template of the final goal state? Here I review recent data and molecular mechanisms relevant to morphogenetic fields: large-scale systems of physical properties that have been proposed to store patterning information during embryogenesis, regenerative repair, and cancer suppression that ultimately controls anatomy. Placing special emphasis on the role of endogenous bioelectric signals as an important component of the morphogenetic field, I speculate on novel approaches for the computational modeling and control of these fields with applications to synthetic biology, regenerative medicine, and evolutionary developmental biology.

Turing-Child field underlies spatial periodicity in Drosophila and planarians

The regular spatial periodicity manifested in Drosophila gene expression has been considered as a test case for the involvement of a Turing system in biology. It was expected--if such involvement exists--to find a spatially periodic protein distribution where the proteins are Turing morphogens. The failure to find such a periodic distribution of Turing proteins, and the experimental findings of the involvement of different combinations of regulatory proteins and different binding sites for the different stripes of a periodic gene expression, has resulted in the dismissal of the involvement of a Turing system in Drosophila periodicity and segmentation. But if one is willing to allow a Turing system in the level of post-translational modification of proteins instead of in the protein level, one can explain the regular spatial periodicity of gene expression. The source of the spatial periodicity of gene expression does not lie in the regulatory proteins, but in the spatially periodic post-translational modification of these broadly distributed upstream regulatory proteins. The post-translational modification provides the missing spatial information for the regular pattern of 14 stripes. We report that such a field with segmental spatial periodicity that can affect downstream proteins and modify them post-translationally and periodically has been observed. This is the Turing-Child (TC) field. We explain the recent observation in Drosophila of phosphorylated transcription factor distributed with segmental periodicity, the disappearance of the spatially periodic gene expression when the regulatory protein loses its normal ability to be phosphorylated, and the spatially periodic segmental groove formation. Just as the reduction of Turing wavelength causes the appearance of 14 stripes in Drosophila so it causes the appearance of bipolar 2-headed Planaria.

Self-organization in and on biological spheres

Three biological settings involving self-organization performed by the Turing-Child field inside a sphere and on its surface are considered. In the first setting the interior of a sphere made up of cells communicating via gap junctions is considered. It is suggested that the Turing-Child self-organization is the cause of radial polarization, the first differentiation of an early mammalian embryo. In the second setting, the Turing example of gastrulation of a hollow cellular sphere is considered. It is shown that Child's experimental patterns are predicted and explained by the Turing-Child theory. The third setting is the interior of a biological cell, and it is suggested that it is the self-organization of the Turing-Child field that causes the formation of the mitotic spindle.

Symmetry breaking and convergent extension in early chordate development

The initiation of axis, polarity, cell differentiation, and gastrulation in the very early chordate development is due to the breaking of radial symmetry. It is believed that this occurs by an external signal. We suggest instead spontaneous symmetry breaking through the agency of the Turing-Child field. Increased size or decreased diffusivity, both brought about by mitotic activity, cause the spontaneous loss of stability of the homogeneous state and the evolution of the metabolic pattern during development. The polar metabolic pattern is the cause of polar gene expression, polar morphogenesis (gastrulation), and polar mitotic activity. The Turing-Child theory explains not only the spontaneous formation of the invagination in gastrulation but also the coherent cell movement observed in convergence and extension during gastrulation and neurulation. The theory is demonstrated with respect to experimental observations on the early development of fish, amphibian, and the chick. The theory can explain a multitude of experimental details. For example, it explains the splayed polar progression of reduction in the fish blastoderm. Reduction starts on that side of the blastoderm margin, which will initiate invagination several hours later. It progresses toward the blastoderm center and somewhat laterally from this future "dorsal lip". This is precisely as predicted by a Turing-Child system in a circle. And for a fish like zebrafish with a blastoderm that is slightly oval, reduction is observed to progress along the long axis of the ellipse, which is what Turing-Child theory predicts. In general the shape and the chemical nature of the experimental patterns are the same as predicted by the Turing couple (cAMP, ATP). Embryological polarity and convergent extension are based on polar eigenfunction and saddle-shaped eigenfunction, respectively.

Induction and the Turing-Child field in development

The central problem in biological development is the understanding of epigenesis. The dominant theory of development in the last 80 years that also purports to explain epigenesis is induction theory. It suggests that development is driven by sequential inductions where each "induction" (in one sense of the word induction) is effected by the action of an inducing part of the embryo on a responding part of the embryo. The theory stems from Spemann and Mangold (W.Roux' Arch.f.Entw.d.Organis.u.mikrosk.Anat.100 (1924) 599) who transplanted a tissue from the dorsal blastopore lip of Triturus into the ventral ectoderm of another gastrula and thus initiated and "induced" (in another sense of the word induction) gastrulation and embryogenesis in the ventral side of the host that became a double embryo (siamese twins). We explain this induction, i.e. the formation of the double embryo, according to the Child theory and the Turing-Gierer-Meinhardt theory when it is also assumed that cAMP and ATP are the Turing activator and inhibitor, respectively. Spemann and Mangold (W.Roux' Arch.f.Entw.d.Organis.u.mikrosk.Anat.100 (1924) 599) also suggested that the ingressing mesoderm induces the overlying ectoderm to form the neural plate and neural tube. This 'neural induction', the 'primary embryonic induction', became the cornerstone of induction theory, i.e. of the sequential induction concept referred to above. But we argue that the metabolic gradients that precede and accompany neurulation, as obtained by Child, also for Triturus, arise through a Turing self-organization if it is assumed that cAMP and ATP are the Turing morphogens, and these gradients are the cause and primary event of neurulation. Thus there is no need to invoke the 'neural induction'. It is argued that fundamental events such as gastrulation and also organ formation are caused by the Turing-Child field and not by sequential induction. Similar principles, such as bud formation caused by a radial metabolic pattern that transforms to a longitudinal pattern, govern the formation, for example, of the mouth and the gut. The formation and localization of bottle cells is explained according to the Child-Turing field and modern biochemistry. The chemical metabolic pre-pattern precedes, and causes, morphogenesis and differentiation as envisaged by Turing. The Spemann and Mangold (W.Roux' Arch.f.Entw.d.Organis.u.mikrosk.Anat.100 (1924) 599) transplantation experiment when performed on a sea urchin duplicates not only the phenotype but also the metabolic (reduction) pattern. These experimental results, by Horstadius, predicted by Child, follow from the Turing-Gierer-Meinhardt theory if it is assumed that cAMP and ATP are the Turing morphogens. If the transplantation is performed not onto the whole sea urchin but onto only a part of it, that manifests only a part of the metabolic pattern, then from the part a phenotypic whole underlain by a normal and a whole metabolic pattern can be rescued. These experimental results of Horstadius follow from Turing theory if cAMP and ATP are the Turing morphogens. Understanding how to transform a part into a whole can be valuable in regenerative medicine. Unspecific induction of a secondary amphibian embryo is similar to the induction of posterior structures at the anterior pole of an insect, and the "double abdomen" (and Kalthoff's experimental results) of the midge Smittia resulting from UV irradiation of the anterior pole, can be explained by Meinhardt theory of unspecific induction if ATP is the Turing morphogen. When not working on regeneration, Child investigated intact living organisms and his observation method was not disruptive to normal development, whereas workers in induction theory work with pieces and in general disrupt normal development. We conclude that the Turing-Child field causes all development and explains epigenesis. Sequential induction does not explain epigenesis and does not exist in normal development. But induction in the sense of a transplantation leading to double embryo or rescuing a whole phenotype from a part is of interest.

Polarity and form regulation in development and reconstitution

In the literature, it is often assumed, for example with respect to Hydra, that several Turing systems coexist and it is also assumed that maintaining the polar profile, even when the system increases in size, is important for the polarity of the final phenotype. It is shown here that in reality there is only one Turing system, Child's system. To obtain a complete polar individual or organ, whether in reconstitution or development, it is essential that the complete succession of metabolic patterns occurs. Child's concepts of physiological dominance, subordination and isolation are interpreted in the light of Turing theory and in particular the Turing wavelength. It is emphasised, particularly by pointing to Child's metabolic patterns in coelenterates, both in development and in reconstitution, that it is the elongation that drives the succession polar metabolic pattern-->bipolar metabolic pattern, and this corresponds to the prediction of Turing theory supporting the thesis that Child's metabolic pattern is a Turing pattern. It is shown that if we assume that ATP is the Turing inhibitor then the many results of Child about the reduction of the scale of organisation with the decrease in the intensity of the energy metabolism correspond to the reduction of the Turing wavelength. The interplay between the Turing wavelength and the length of the form explains the conditions of reconstitution under which partial forms, wholes and form regulation are obtained. It is suggested that higher metabolism is responsible for both larger size and larger Turing wavelength thus securing form regulation. The results could be of importance in modern 'regenerative biology'. Heteromorphosis, i.e. animals with two heads (or two tails), one at each end, is explained by a bipolar Turing-Child metabolic pattern replacing a polar metabolic pattern. This can be brought about by chemical or by genetic means and indeed the prediction for Drosophila that the transition, wild type-->Bicaudal D, occurs because a polar Turing pattern is replaced by bipolar Turing pattern is confirmed, again if we accept that Child's metabolic pattern is the underlying Turing pattern. Child's experiments on Drosophila, including the requirement of critical length for metabolic polarity, are explained by Turing theory. Phenocopies and phenotypes are explained by the Turing-Child theory. It is shown that both Child's results about metabolic patterns and modern results for Hydra about gap junctions, 'endogeneous inhibitor' and gene expression, are correlated and explained by (cAMP, ATP) Turing theory. It is argued that the double-gradient hypothesis is incorrect in its original formulation and that it is Child's conception of succeeding metabolic patterns that is the correct one and that it corresponds to the prediction of the Turing theory.