Different expression of androgen receptor coactivators in human prostate

Targeting the N-terminal domain of the androgen receptor: The effective approach in therapy of CRPC

The androgen receptor (AR) is dominant in prostate cancer (PCa) pathology. Current therapeutic agents for advanced PCa include androgen synthesis inhibitors and AR antagonists that bind to the hormone binding pocket (HBP) at the ligand binding domain (LBD). However, AR amplification, AR splice variants (AR-Vs) expression, and intra-tumoral de novo synthesis of androgens result in the reactivation of AR signalling. The AR N-terminal domain (NTD) plays an essential role in AR transcriptional activity. The AR inhibitor targeting NTD could potentially block the activation of both full-length AR and AR-Vs, thus overcoming major resistance mechanisms to current treatments. This review discusses the progress of research in various NTD inhibitors and provides new insight into the development of AR-NTD inhibitors.

Assays to Interrogate the Ability of Compounds to Inhibit the AF-2 or AF-1 Transactivation Domains of the Androgen Receptor

Prostate cancer is the leading cause of cancer and second leading cause of cancer-related death in men in the United States. Twenty percent of patients receiving the standard of care androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) eventually progress to metastatic and incurable castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Current FDA-approved drugs for CRPC target androgen receptor (AR) binding or androgen production, but only provide a 2- to 5-month survival benefit due to the emergence of resistance. Overexpression of AR coactivators and the emergence of AR splice variants, both promote continued transcriptional activation under androgen-depleted conditions and represent drug resistance mechanisms that contribute to CRPC progression. The AR contains two transactivation domains, activation function 2 (AF-2) and activation function 1 (AF-1), which serve as binding surfaces for coactivators involved in the transcriptional activation of AR target genes. Full-length AR contains both AF-2 and AF-1 surfaces, whereas AR splice variants only have an AF-1 surface. We have recently prosecuted a high-content screening campaign to identify hit compounds that can inhibit or disrupt the protein-protein interactions (PPIs) between AR and transcriptional intermediary factor 2 (TIF2), one of the coactivators implicated in CRPC disease progression. Since an ideal inhibitor/disruptor of AR-coactivator PPIs would target both the AF-2 and AF-1 surfaces, we describe here the development and validation of five AF-2- and three AF-1-focused assays to interrogate and prioritize hits that disrupt both transactivation surfaces. The assays were validated using a test set of seven known AR modulator compounds, including three AR antagonists and one androgen synthesis inhibitor that are FDA-approved ADTs, two investigational molecules that target the N-terminal domain of AR, and an inhibitor of the Hsp90 (heat shock protein) molecular chaperone.

Consideration of breast cancer subtype in targeting the androgen receptor

The androgen receptor (AR) is a drug target in breast cancer, and AR-targeted therapies have induced tumor responses in breast cancer patients. In this review, we summarized the role of AR in breast cancer based on preclinical and clinical data. Response to AR-targeted therapies in unselected breast cancer populations is relatively low. Preclinical and clinical data show that AR antagonists might have a role in estrogen receptor (ER)-negative/AR-positive tumors. The prognostic value of AR for patients remains uncertain due to the use of various antibodies and cut-off values for immunohistochemical assessment. To get more insight into the role of AR in breast cancer, we additionally performed a retrospective pooled analysis to determine the prognostic value of the AR using mRNA profiles of 7270 primary breast tumors. Our analysis shows that a higher AR mRNA level is associated with improved disease outcome in patients with ER-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative tumors, but with worse disease outcome in HER2-positive subgroups. In conclusion, next to AR expression, incorporation of additional tumor characteristics will potentially make AR targeting a more valuable therapeutic strategy in breast cancer.

A unifying biology of sex steroid-induced apoptosis in prostate and breast cancers

Prostate and breast cancer are the two cancers with the highest incidence in men and women, respectively. Here, we focus on the known biology of acquired resistance to antihormone therapy of prostate and breast cancer and compare laboratory and clinical similarities in the evolution of the disease. Laboratory studies and clinical observations in prostate and breast cancer demonstrate that cell selection pathways occur during acquired resistance to antihormonal therapy. Following sex steroid deprivation, both prostate and breast cancer models show an initial increased acquired sensitivity to the growth potential of sex steroids. Subsequently, prostate and breast cancer cells either become dependent upon the antihormone treatment or grow spontaneously in the absence of hormones. Paradoxically, the physiologic sex steroids now kill a proportion of selected, but vulnerable, resistant tumor cells. The sex steroid receptor complex triggers apoptosis. We draw parallels between acquired resistance in prostate and breast cancer to sex steroid deprivation. Clinical observations and patient trials confirm the veracity of the laboratory studies. We consider therapeutic strategies to increase response rates in clinical trials of metastatic disease that can subsequently be applied as a preemptive salvage adjuvant therapy. The goal of future advances is to enhance response rates and deploy a safe strategy earlier in the treatment plan to save lives. The introduction of a simple evidence-based enhanced adjuvant therapy as a global healthcare strategy has the potential to control recurrence, reduce hospitalization, reduce healthcare costs and maintain a healthier population that contributes to society.

Trends in Gene Expression Profiling for Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study is to review biotechnology advances in gene expression profiling on prostate cancer (PCa), focusing on experimental platform development and gene discovery, in relation to different study designs and outcomes in order to understand how they can be exploited to improve PCa diagnosis and clinical management.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review on gene expression profiling studies through PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science between 2000 and 2016. Tissue biopsy and clinical gene profiling studies with different outcomes (e.g., recurrence, survival) were included.

RESULTS

Over 3,000 papers were screened and 137 full-text articles were selected. In terms of technology used, microarray is still the most popular technique, increasing from 50 to 70% between 2010 and 2015, but there has been a rise in the number of studies using RNA sequencing (13% in 2015). Sample sizes have increased, as well as the number of genes that can be screened all at once, but we have also observed more focused targeting in more recent studies. Qualitative analysis on the specific genes found associated with PCa risk or clinical outcomes revealed a large variety of gene candidates, with a few consistent cross-studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The last 15 years of research in gene expression in PCa have brought a large volume of data and information that has been decoded only in part, but advancements in high-throughput sequencing technology are increasing the amount of data that can be generated. The variety of findings warrants the execution of both validation studies and meta-analyses. Genetic biomarkers have tremendous potential for early diagnosis of PCa and, if coupled with other diagnostics (e.g., imaging), can effectively be used to concretize less-invasive, personalized prediction of PCa risk and progression.

Androgen receptor signaling in castration-resistant prostate cancer: a lesson in persistence

The androgen receptor (AR) signaling axis drives all stages of prostate cancer, including the lethal, drug-resistant form of the disease termed castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), which arises after failure of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Persistent AR activity in spite of ADT and the second-generation AR-targeting agents enzalutamide and abiraterone is achieved in many cases by direct alterations to the AR signaling axis. Herein, we provide a detailed description of how such alterations contribute to the development and progression of CRPC. Aspects of this broad and ever-evolving field specifically addressed in this review include: the etiology and significance of increased AR expression; the frequency and role of gain-of-function mutations in the AR gene; the function of constitutively active, truncated forms of the AR termed AR variants and the clinical relevance of alterations to the activity and expression of AR coregulators. Additionally, we examine the novel therapeutic strategies to inhibit these classes of therapy resistance mechanisms, with an emphasis on emerging agents that act in a manner distinct from the current ligand-centric approaches. Throughout, we discuss how the central role of AR in prostate cancer and the constant evolution of the AR signaling axis during disease progression represent archetypes of two key concepts in oncology, oncogene addiction and therapy-mediated selection pressure.

ID4 promotes AR expression and blocks tumorigenicity of PC3 prostate cancer cells

Deregulation of tumor suppressor genes is associated with tumorigenesis and the development of cancer. In prostate cancer, ID4 is epigenetically silenced and acts as a tumor suppressor. In normal prostate epithelial cells, ID4 collaborates with androgen receptor (AR) and p53 to exert its tumor suppressor activity. Previous studies have shown that ID4 promotes tumor suppressive function of AR whereas loss of ID4 results in tumor promoter activity of AR. Previous study from our lab showed that ectopic ID4 expression in DU145 attenuates proliferation and promotes AR expression suggesting that ID4 dependent AR activity is tumor suppressive. In this study, we examined the effect of ectopic expression of ID4 on highly malignant prostate cancer cell, PC3. Here we show that stable overexpression of ID4 in PC3 cells leads to increased apoptosis and decreased cell proliferation and migration. In addition, in vivo studies showed a decrease in tumor size and volume of ID4 overexpressing PC3 cells, in nude mice. At the molecular level, these changes were associated with increased androgen receptor (AR), p21, and AR dependent FKBP51 expression. At the mechanistic level, ID4 may regulate the expression or function of AR through specific but yet unknown AR co-regulators that may determine the final outcome of AR function.

Role of the Androgen-Androgen Receptor Axis in the Treatment Resistance of Advanced Prostate Cancer: From Androgen-Dependent to Castration Resistant and Further

After the introduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, prostate cancer diagnosis has shifted to early and curative stages, although 10-20% of patients still present with metastatic and incurable cancer. Prostate cancer is androgen-dependent, and most patients with prostate cancer initially respond to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). After 1-2 years of the treatment, advanced prostate cancer eventually progresses to castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). A variety of mechanisms of progression from androgen-dependent prostate cancer to CRPC under ADT have been postulated, and the key pathway is re-activation of the androgen-androgen receptor (AR) axis, for example, caused by AR mutation/overexpression/splice variants, altered expression of AR cofactors, and increased production of androgens. Recently approved new agents, such as the hormonal agents abiraterone and enzalutamide and the chemotherapeutic agent cabazitaxel, have demonstrated survival benefit in men with CRPC. However, the prolongation of survival times provided with these agents is limited because of the treatment resistance. Androgen-AR axis still plays a pivotal role in the resistance to the new agents for CRPC. To improve the prognosis of patients with CRPC, intensive research to identify effective agents, treatment strategies, and useful predictive biomarkers to select the patients who can benefit from such treatments are required. Additional clinical data, with a better understanding of the biology of CRPC, may provide better CRPC treatment outcomes. This article reviews the underlying mechanisms of treatment resistance and future direction of CRPC treatments.

Progress in the mechanism and drug development of castration-resistant prostate cancer

Although prostate cancer can initially respond to androgen deprivation therapy, it will inevitably relapse and switch to a castration-resistant state. The progress in understanding the mechanism of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) has led to the evolution of novel agents, including sipuleucel-T as an immunomodulant agent, enzalutamide as an androgen receptor antagonist, docetaxel as a chemotherapeutic agent and radium-223 as a radiopharmaceutical agent. In this review, we discuss the main mechanisms of CRPC and the development of promising agents along with the novel therapies in the clinic. New therapeutic challenges remain, such as the identification of predictive biomarkers and the optimal combinations of agents. Future investigation is still needed for a better understanding of CRPC.

Non-Coding RNAs in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Regulation of Androgen Receptor Signaling and Cancer Metabolism

Hormone-refractory prostate cancer frequently relapses from therapy and inevitably progresses to a bone-metastatic status with no cure. Understanding of the molecular mechanisms conferring resistance to androgen deprivation therapy has the potential to lead to the discovery of novel therapeutic targets for type of prostate cancer with poor prognosis. Progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is characterized by aberrant androgen receptor (AR) expression and persistent AR signaling activity. Alterations in metabolic activity regulated by oncogenic pathways, such as c-Myc, were found to promote prostate cancer growth during the development of CRPC. Non-coding RNAs represent a diverse family of regulatory transcripts that drive tumorigenesis of prostate cancer and various other cancers by their hyperactivity or diminished function. A number of studies have examined differentially expressed non-coding RNAs in each stage of prostate cancer. Herein, we highlight the emerging impacts of microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs linked to reactivation of the AR signaling axis and reprogramming of the cellular metabolism in prostate cancer. The translational implications of non-coding RNA research for developing new biomarkers and therapeutic strategies for CRPC are also discussed.

Evolving therapeutic concepts in prostate cancer based on genome-wide analyses (review)

Treatment of castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) continues to represent a major urooncological challenge due to tumor heterogeneity and the inevitable development of therapy resistance. Although androgen deprivation therapy retains an important role in the management of CRPC, recent evidence suggests that a broader spectrum of therapeutic targets may improve patient response and delay development of advanced disease. Genome-wide analyses have identified four major signaling nodes that are most frequently altered in prostate cancer: i) the androgen receptor (AR); ii) the PI3K pathway; iii) the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway; and iv) the retinoblastoma protein (pRB) signaling pathway. Extensive crosstalk and redundancy exists between these signaling pathways, which underscores the need for combination therapies. There are several novel AR pathway inhibitors currently in clinical use. Clinical trials are being performed on single-agent PI3K inhibitors with some success in tumors with genetically altered PI3K components. MEK/ERK inhibitors are also in clinical trials and the importance of pRB inactivation in prostate cancer is becoming more widely recognized. A greater understanding of the effects of single agent therapy on compensatory signaling pathway activation that can potentially thwart antitumoral responses is urgently needed and will provide additional insight into the mechanism of therapy resistance and how to further delay the progression to lethal disease.

Ligand-independent androgen receptors promote ovarian teratocarcinoma cell growth by stimulating self-renewal of cancer stem/progenitor cells

BACKGROUND

Ovarian teratocarcinoma (OVTC) arises from germ cells and contains a high percentage of cancer stem/progenitor cells (CSPCs), which promote cancer development through their ability to self-renew. Androgen and androgen receptor (androgen/AR) signaling has been reported to participate in cancer stemness in some types of cancer; however, this phenomenon has never been studied in OVTC.

METHODS

Ovarian teratocarcinoma cell line PA1 was manipulated to overexpress or knockdown AR by lentiviral deliver system. After analyzing of AR expression in PA1 cells, cell growth assay was assessed at every given time point. In order to determine ligand effect on AR actions, luciferase assay was performed to evaluate endogenous and exogenous AR function in PA1 cells. CD133 stem cell marker antibody was used to identify CSPCs in PA1 cells, and AR expression level in enriched CSPCs was determined. To assess AR effects on CD133+ population progression, stem cell functional assays (side population, sphere formation assay, CD133 expression) were used to analyze role of AR in PA1 CSPCs. In tissue specimen, immunohistochemistry staining was used to carry out AR and CD133 staining in normal and tumor tissue.

RESULTS

We examined androgen/AR signaling in OVTC PA1 cells, a CSPCs-rich cell line, and found that AR, but not androgen, promoted cell growth. We also examined the effects of AR on CSPCs characteristics and found that AR expression was more abundant in CD133+ cells, a well-defined ovarian cancer stem/progenitor marker, than in CD133- populations. Moreover, results of the sphere formation assay revealed that AR expression was required to maintain CSPCs populations. Interestingly, this AR-governed self-renewal capacity of CSPCs was only observed in CD133+ cells. In addition, we found that AR-mediated CSPCs enrichment was accompanied by down-regulation of p53 and p16. Finally, co-expression of AR and CD133 was more abundant in OVTC lesions than in normal ovarian tissue.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that AR itself might play a ligand-independent role in the development of OVTC.

An androgen receptor N-terminal domain antagonist for treating prostate cancer

Hormone therapies for advanced prostate cancer target the androgen receptor (AR) ligand-binding domain (LBD), but these ultimately fail and the disease progresses to lethal castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The mechanisms that drive CRPC are incompletely understood, but may involve constitutively active AR splice variants that lack the LBD. The AR N-terminal domain (NTD) is essential for AR activity, but targeting this domain with small-molecule inhibitors is complicated by its intrinsic disorder. Here we investigated EPI-001, a small-molecule antagonist of AR NTD that inhibits protein-protein interactions necessary for AR transcriptional activity. We found that EPI analogs covalently bound the NTD to block transcriptional activity of AR and its splice variants and reduced the growth of CRPC xenografts. These findings suggest that the development of small-molecule inhibitors that bind covalently to intrinsically disordered proteins is a promising strategy for development of specific and effective anticancer agents.

Diverse roles for the paxillin family of proteins in cancer

The paxillin family of intracellular scaffold proteins includes paxillin, Hic-5, and leupaxin, and all have been identified as key regulators of the cellular migration machinery in both 2- and 3-dimensional microenvironments. Herein, we provide insight into the roles of these proteins during tumorigenesis and metastasis, highlighting their functions in cancer initiation as well as tumor cell dissemination and survival. Furthermore, we speculate on the potential of paxillin family proteins as both future prognostic and therapeutic targets.

New therapeutic approach to suppress castration-resistant prostate cancer using ASC-J9 via targeting androgen receptor in selective prostate cells

Using androgen receptor (AR) knockout mice to determine AR functions in selective prostate cancer (PCa) cells, we determined that AR might play differential roles in various cell types, either to promote or suppress PCa development/progression. These observations partially explain the failure of current androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to reduce/prevent androgen binding to AR in every cell. Herein, we identified the AR degradation enhancer ASC-J9, which selectively degrades AR protein via interruption of the AR-AR selective coregulator interaction. Such selective interruption could, therefore, suppress AR-mediated PCa growth in the androgen-sensitive stage before ADT and in the castration-resistant stage after ADT. Mechanistic dissection suggested that ASC-J9 could activate the proteasome-dependent pathway to promote AR degradation through the enhanced association of AR-Mdm2 complex. The consequences of ASC-J9-promoted AR degradation included reduced androgen binding to AR, AR N-C terminal interaction, and AR nuclear translocation. Such inhibitory regulation could then result in suppression of AR transactivation and AR-mediated cell growth in eight different mouse models, including intact or castrated nude mice xenografted with androgen-sensitive LNCaP cells or androgen-insensitive C81 cells and castrated nude mice xenografted with castration-resistant C4-2 and CWR22Rv1 cells, and TRAMP and Pten(+/-) mice. These results demonstrate that ASC-J9 could serve as an AR degradation enhancer that effectively suppresses PCa development/progression in the androgen-sensitive and castration-resistant stages.

The chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor II negatively regulates the transactivation of androgen receptor in prostate cancer cells

Androgen receptor (AR) is involved in the development and progression of prostate cancers. However, the mechanisms by which this occurs remain incompletely understood. In previous reports, chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor II (COUP-TF II) has been suggested to play a role in the development of cancers. In the present study, we explored a putative role of COUP-TF II in prostate cancers by investigating its effect on cell proliferation and a cross-talk between COUP-TF II and AR. Overexpression of COUP-TF II results in the inhibition of androgen-dependent proliferation of prostate cancer cells. Further studies show that COUP-TF II functions as a corepressor of AR. It represses AR transactivation on target promoters containing the androgen response element (ARE) in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, COUP-TF II interacts physically with AR in vitro and in vivo. It binds to both the DNA binding domain (DBD) and the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of AR and disrupts the N/C terminal interaction of AR. Furthermore, COUP-TF II competes with coactivators such as ARA70, SRC-1, and GRIP1 to modulate AR transactivation as well as inhibiting the recruitment of AR to its ARE-containing target promoter. Taken together, our findings suggest that COUP-TF II is a novel corepressor of AR, and provide an insight into the role of COUP-TF II in prostate cancers.

Hic-5 affects proliferation, migration and invasion of B16 murine melanoma cells

Hic-5 is a shuttling protein between the cell membrane and the nucleus which functions as a focal adhesion adaptor protein and a nuclear receptor coactivator. Although several studies have shown its involvement in other types of cancer, the role of Hic-5 in melanoma is unknown. Herein, we show for the first time that Hic-5 is expressed in B16-F1 murine melanoma cells. To determine its function in melanoma cells, we used shRNA-mediated RNA interference and established stable clones with down-regulated Hic-5 expression. These clones had impaired growth and metastatic potential compared with controls in vivo, which correlated with decreased proliferation, migration and invasion in vitro. Moreover, silencing of Hic-5 expression in B16-F1 activated RhoA with an amoeboid phenotypic change, indicating that Hic-5 is a key regulator of B16-F1 metastasis in the context of Rho-dependent motility. These results provide new evidence that Hic-5 is a possible molecular target for treatment of melanoma.

Nuclear epidermal growth factor receptor interacts with transcriptional intermediary factor 2 to activate cyclin D1 gene expression triggered by the oncoprotein latent membrane protein 1

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a ubiquitously expressed receptor tyrosine kinase, is an important factor in carcinogenesis. Transcriptional intermediary factor 2 (TIF2), a member of the p160 nuclear receptor co-activator gene family, is linked to the proliferation of cancer cells. However, the direct interplay between the EGFR and the nuclear receptors remains unclear. Our previous study demonstrated that nuclear EGFR could directly bind to the cyclin D1 promoter under the regulation of the oncoprotein latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1), but it also indicated that other factors are involved in the activation of target genes. In this study, we found that LMP1 upregulated the expression of TIF2 and promoted the interaction of EGFR with TIF2 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the intact complex was linked with cyclin D1 promoter activity in an LMP1-dependent manner. The physiological functions of the intact complex were associated with cell proliferation and cell cycle progression. These findings suggest that TIF2 is a novel binding partner for nuclear EGFR and is involved in regulating its target gene expression.

Identification of Nkx2-3 and TGFB1I1 expression levels as potential biomarkers to predict the effects of FOLFOX4 chemotherapy

This study was designed to detect global gene expressions of primary advanced colorectal cancer (ACC) patients who have undergone FOLFOX4 chemotherapy and screen valuable biomarkers to predict the effects of chemotherapy. Samples from primary ACC patients who have undergone FOLFOX4 chemotherapy were collected. Their chemotherapy effects were evaluated and divided into chemotherapy sensitive group (experimental group) and non-sensitive group (control group). Cancerous tissue gene expression profiles were detected by chip technology. Two groups with differentially expressed genes were screened by cluster analysis and significance analysis of microarrays (SAM). Valuable biomarkers were screened by bioinformatics analysis. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed to characterize the pattern of Nkx2-3 and TGFB1I1 expression. Nkx2-3 and TGFB1I1 signal log ratio were used Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses to calculate its own predicting accuracy. Thirty cases were divided into experimental group (13 cases) and control group (17 cases). There was evident difference in the tumor cell biology states of the two groups; that is, 25 ESTs (21 genes) were upregulated and 5 ESTs (5 genes) were downregulated. Nkx2-3 protein was observed on the nucleus of the cancer cells and TGFB1I1 protein was observed on the nucleus and cytoplasm of the cancer cells in experimental group. Their prediction accuracies were 85.3% and 76.7% respectively. Nkx2-3 and TGFB1I1 expressions in control group are very low, but highly expressed in the experimental group; Nkx2-3 and TGFB1I1 may be classified as valuable biomarkers, as these can predict the effects of primary ACC patients who will undergo FOLFOX4.

Small molecule inhibition of the steroid receptor coactivators, SRC-3 and SRC-1

Overexpression of steroid receptor coactivator (SRC)-1 and SRC-3 is associated with cancer initiation, metastasis, advanced disease, and resistance to chemotherapy. In most of these cases, SRC-1 and SRC-3 have been shown to promote tumor cell growth by activating nuclear receptor and multiple growth factor signaling cascades that lead to uncontrolled tumor cell growth. Up until now, most targeted chemotherapeutic drugs have been designed largely to block a single pathway at a time, but cancers frequently acquire resistance by switching to alternative growth factor pathways. We reason that the development of chemotherapeutic agents against SRC coactivators that sit at the nexus of multiple cell growth signaling networks and transcriptional factors should be particularly effective therapeutics. To substantiate this hypothesis, we report the discovery of 2,2'-bis-(Formyl-1,6,7-trihydroxy-5-isopropyl-3-methylnaphthalene (gossypol) as a small molecule inhibitor of coactivator SRC-1 and SRC-3. Our data indicate that gossypol binds directly to SRC-3 in its receptor interacting domain. In MCF-7 breast cancer cells, gossypol selectively reduces the cellular protein concentrations of SRC-1 and SRC-3 without generally altering overall protein expression patterns, SRC-2, or other coactivators, such as p300 and coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1. Gossypol reduces the concentration of SRC-3 in prostate, lung, and liver cancer cell lines. Gossypol inhibits cell viability in the same cancer cell lines where it promotes SRC-3 down-regulation. Additionally, gossypol sensitizes lung and breast cancer cell lines to the inhibitory effects of other chemotherapeutic agents. Importantly, gossypol is selectively cytotoxic to cancer cells, whereas normal cell viability is not affected. This data establish the proof-of-principle that, as a class, SRC-1 and SRC-3 coactivators are accessible chemotherapeutic targets. Given their function as integrators of multiple cell growth signaling systems, SRC-1/SRC-3 small molecule inhibitors comprise a new class of drugs that have potential as novel chemotherapeutics able to defeat aspects of acquired cancer cell resistance mechanisms.

Distinct roles for paxillin and Hic-5 in regulating breast cancer cell morphology, invasion, and metastasis

This study reveals novel roles for the focal adhesion proteins paxillin and Hic-5 in regulating breast cancer invasion strategies and metastasis. Depletion of paxillin promotes a hypermesenchymal phenotype while dysregulating 3D adhesion dynamics. In contrast, RNAi of Hic-5 induces a hyperamoeboid phenotype with dysregulated RhoA/pMLC signaling.

Individual metastatic tumor cells exhibit two interconvertible modes of cell motility during tissue invasion that are classified as either mesenchymal or amoeboid. The molecular mechanisms by which invasive breast cancer cells regulate this migratory plasticity have yet to be fully elucidated. Herein we show that the focal adhesion adaptor protein, paxillin, and the closely related Hic-5 have distinct and unique roles in the regulation of breast cancer cell lung metastasis by modulating cell morphology and cell invasion through three-dimensional extracellular matrices (3D ECMs). Cells depleted of paxillin by RNA interference displayed a highly elongated mesenchymal morphology, whereas Hic-5 knockdown induced an amoeboid phenotype with both cell populations exhibiting reduced plasticity, migration persistence, and velocity through 3D ECM environments. In evaluating associated signaling pathways, we determined that Rac1 activity was increased in cells devoid of paxillin whereas Hic-5 silencing resulted in elevated RhoA activity and associated Rho kinase–induced nonmuscle myosin II activity. Hic-5 was essential for adhesion formation in 3D ECMs, and analysis of adhesion dynamics and lifetime identified paxillin as a key regulator of 3D adhesion assembly, stabilization, and disassembly.

Epithelial Hic-5/ARA55 expression contributes to prostate tumorigenesis and castrate responsiveness

Stromal–epithelial interactions dictate prostate tumorigenesis and response to castration. Hydrogen peroxide-inducible clone 5 (Hic-5/ARA55) is a transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β)-induced coactivator of androgen receptor (AR) expressed in the prostate stroma. Interestingly, following castration, we identified epithelial expression of Hic-5/ARA55 in mouse and human prostate tissues. To determine the role of epithelial Hic-5 in prostate cancer progression and castration responsiveness, we compared LNCaP cells having Hic-5 stably expressed with the parental LNCaP cells following tissue recombination xenografts with mouse prostate stromal cells. We previously identified knocking out prostate stromal TGF-β signaling potentiated castrate-resistant prostate tumors, in a Wnt-dependent manner. The LNCaP chimeric tumors containing prostate fibroblasts conditionally knocked out for the TGF-β type II receptor (Tgfbr2-KO) resulted in larger, more invasive, and castration-resistant tumors compared those with floxed (control) stromal cells. However, the LNCaP-Hic5 associated with Tgfbr2-KO fibroblasts generated chimeric tumors with reduced tumor volume, lack of invasion and restored castration dependence. Neutralization of canonical Wnt signaling is shown to reduce prostate tumor size and restore regression following castration. Thus, we hypothesized that epithelial Hic-5/ARA55 expression negatively regulated Wnt signaling. The mechanism of the Hic-5/ARA55 effects on castration was determined by analysis of the c-myc promoter. C-myc luciferase reporter activity suggested Hic-5/ARA55 expression inhibited c-myc activity by β-catenin. Sequential ChIP analysis indicated β-catenin and T-cell-specific 4 (TCF4) bound the endogenous c-myc promoter in the absence of Hic-5 expression. However, the formation of a TCF4/Hic-5 repressor complex inhibited c-myc promoter activity, by excluding β-catenin binding with TCF4 on the promoter. The data indicate Hic-5/ARA55 expression in response to castration-enabled epithelial regression through the repression of c-myc gene at the chromatin level.

Effect of the hsp90 inhibitor geldanamycin on androgen response of prostate cancer under hypoxic conditions

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the androgen response of hormone-dependent prostate cancer cells under hypoxia and to examine the effect of geldanamycin (GA), a heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90)-specific inhibitor, on the androgen response.

METHODS

LNCaP cells were cultured with or without GA under normoxic or hypoxic conditions. Cell viability was examined in response to dihydrotestosterone (DHT). Luciferase reporter gene assay was used to measure androgen response element (ARE)- and hypoxia response element (HRE)-mediated transcriptional activities. Western blot was used to analyze the protein levels of androgen receptor (AR), hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha (HIF-1alpha) and Hsp90.

RESULTS

The DHT-dependent growth and ARE-mediated transcriptional activities of LNCaP cells were depressed under hypoxic conditions. However, these effects were recovered after incubation with GA. In contrast, hypoxia-induced HRE-mediated transcriptional activity, which was dose-dependently increased by DHT, was suppressed by GA. The expression of AR, HIF-1alpha and Hsp90 proteins were decreased under hypoxic conditions by adding GA.

CONCLUSIONS

Geldanamycin increases the androgen response regardless of AR protein in hormone-dependent prostate cancer cells under hypoxic conditions.

Normal and cancer-related functions of the p160 steroid receptor co-activator (SRC) family

The three homologous members of the p160 SRC family (SRC1, SRC2 and SRC3) mediate the transcriptional functions of nuclear receptors and other transcription factors, and are the most studied of all the transcriptional co-activators. Recent work has indicated that the SRCgenes are subject to amplification and overexpression in various human cancers. Some of the molecular mechanisms responsible for SRC overexpression, along with the mechanisms by which SRCs promote breast and prostate cancer cell proliferation and survival, have been identified, as have the specific contributions of individual SRC family members to spontaneous breast and prostate carcinogenesis in genetically manipulated mouse models. These studies have identified new challenges for cancer research and therapy.

Amino-terminus domain of the androgen receptor as a molecular target to prevent the hormonal progression of prostate cancer

Prostate cancer has a propensity to metastasize to the bone. Currently the only effective systemic treatment for these patients is androgen ablation therapy. However, the tumor will invariably progress to an androgen-independent stage and the patient will succumb to his disease within approximately 2 years. The earliest indication of hormonal progression is the rising titer of serum prostate specific antigen. Current evidence implicates the androgen receptor (AR) as a key factor in maintaining the growth of prostate cancer cells in an androgen-depleted state. Under normal conditions, binding of ligand activates the receptor, allowing it to effectively bind to its respective DNA element. However, AR is also transformed in the absence of androgen (ligand-independent activation) in prostate cells via multiple protein kinase pathways and the interleukin-6 (IL-6) pathway that converge upon the N-terminal domain of the AR. This domain is the main region for phosphorylation and is also critical for normal coregulator recruitment. Here we discuss evidence supporting the role of the AR, IL-6 and other protein kinase pathways in the hormonal progression of prostate cancer to androgen independence and the mechanisms involved in activation of the AR by these pathways. Receptor-targeted therapy, especially potential drugs targeting the N-terminal domain, may effectively prevent or delay the hormonal progression of AR-dependent prostate cancer.

Prolonged androgen receptor loading onto chromatin and the efficient recruitment of p160 coactivators contribute to androgen-independent growth of prostate cancer cells

BACKGROUND

Growth of most ablation-resistant prostate cancers (CaPs) is dependent on androgen receptor (AR) activity in chromatin, but cancer cells in these tumors have acquired altered AR activation. It is unclear how the aberrantly activated AR loads onto regulatory regions of AR-targeted genes. The purpose of this study was to assess the AR chromatin loading in an androgen-depleted environment.

METHODS

The expression of PSA in androgen-resistant CaP cells was determined using RT-PCR and Western blot analysis. In order to investigate the binding of the AR to the PSA gene regulatory regions, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) was performed in the androgen-independent cds2 cell line in the presence or absence of androgens. In addition, we examined the involvement of p160 coactivators in the chromatin loading of the AR.

RESULTS

It was found that constitutive activation of PSA expression was the result of sustained occupancy by the AR at the regulatory region of this gene. This stable AR loading was not blocked by the AR antagonist bicalutamide. Furthermore, androgen-resistant CaP cells highly expressed both AR and the p160 coactivators and the AR was able to recruit TIF2. Downregulation of TIF2 using short hairpin RNA disrupted the AR loading to the PSA enhancer and subsequently inhibited AR activity.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged AR localization to the regulatory regions of AR targeted genes and the recruitment of p160 coactivators are a potential mechanism leading to androgen-independent activation of the AR. Disruption of AR chromatin loading could therefore become an important therapeutic target for this disease.

Androgen regulation of the androgen receptor coregulators

Background

The critical role of the androgen receptor (AR) in the development of prostate cancer is well recognized. The transcriptional activity of AR is partly regulated by coregulatory proteins. It has been suggested that these coregulators could also be important in the progression of prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to identify coregulators whose expression is regulated by either the androgens and/or by the expression level of AR.

Methods

We used empty vector and AR cDNA-transfected LNCaP cells (LNCaP-pcDNA3.1, and LNCaP-ARhi, respectively), and grew them for 4 and 24 hours in the presence of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) at various concentrations. The expression of 25 AR coregulators (SRC1, TIF2, PIAS1, PIASx, ARIP4, BRCA1, β-catenin, AIB3, AIB1, CBP, STAT1, NCoR1, AES, cyclin D1, p300, ARA24, LSD1, BAG1L, gelsolin, prohibitin, JMJD2C, JMJD1A, MAK, PAK6 and MAGE11) was then measured by using real-time quantitative RT-PCR (Q-RT-PCR).

Results

Five of the coregulators (AIB1, CBP, MAK, BRCA1 and β-catenin) showed more than 2-fold induction and 5 others (cyclin D1, gelsolin, prohibitin, JMJD1A, and JMJD2C) less than 2-fold induction. Overexpression of AR did not affect the expression of the coregulators alone. However, overexpression of AR enhanced the DHT-stimulated expression of MAK, BRCA1, AIB1 and CBP and reduced the level of expression of β-catenin, cyclinD1 and gelsolin.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we identified 5 coactivators whose expression was induced by androgens suggesting that they could potentiate AR signaling. Overexpression of AR seems to sensitize cells for low levels of androgens.

A novel splice variant of the nuclear coactivator p120 functions strongly for androgen receptor: characteristic expression in prostate disease

We cloned a novel splicing variant for nuclear coactivator p120(alpha), designated as p120beta and studied its function and expression in several human prostate diseases. Transfection assays demonstrated that p120beta functions as a strong coactivator for androgen receptor (AR), but weakly for other nuclear receptors. GST-pull down assay showed that a glutamine-rich region of the p120 bound to the ligand-binding domain of AR. Interestingly, p120beta mRNAs were expressed predominantly in the normal prostate, androgen-responsive prostate cancers and an androgen-sensitive prostate cancer cell line, LNCaP, but weakly in recurrent cancers and the androgen-insensitive prostate cancer cell lines PC3 and DU145. Furthermore, knockdown of p120alpha by siRNA abolished coactivator activity on thyroid hormone receptors (TR) and PPARgamma, but did not affect that of ARs in PC3 cells. In addition, competitive assay with other nuclear receptors demonstrated that TR and PPARgamma did not inhibit p120beta-induced stimulation. These findings suggested that while p120alpha was essential for ligand-dependent stimulation of TRs and PPARgamma, p120beta acted as a coactivating protein predominantly for AR.

Mechanisms of androgen receptor activation in advanced prostate cancer: differential co-activator recruitment and gene expression

Prostate tumour growth depends on androgens; hence treatment includes androgen ablation and anti-androgens. Eventually tumours progress and in approximately 30% of patients this is associated with mutation of the androgen receptor. Several receptor variants associated with advanced disease show promiscuous activation by other hormones and anti-androgens. Such loss of specificity could promote receptor activation, hence tumour growth, in the absence of conventional ligands, explaining therapy failure. We aimed to elucidate mechanisms by which alternative ligands promote receptor activation. The three most commonly identified variants in tumours (with amino-acid substitutions H874Y, T877A and T877S) and wild-type receptor showed differences in co-activator recruitment dependent upon ligand and the interaction motif utilized. Co-expression and knockdown of co-activators that bind via leucine or phenylalanine motifs, combined with chromatin immunoprecipitation and quantitative PCR, revealed these preferences extend to co-activator recruitment in vivo and affect receptor activity at the transcriptional level, with subsequent effects on target gene regulation. The findings suggest that mutant receptors, activated by alternative ligands, drive growth via different mechanisms to androgen-activated wild-type receptor. Tumours may hence behave differently dependent upon any androgen receptor mutation present and what ligand is driving growth, as distinct subsets of genes may be regulated.

Ubiquitylation of epsilon-COP by PIRH2 and regulation of the secretion of PSA

Ubiquitylation appears to be involved in the membrane trafficking system including endocytosis, exocytosis, and ER-to-Golgi transport. We found that PIRH2, which was identified as an interacting protein for androgen receptor or p53, interacts with and ubiquitylates the epsilon-subunit of coatmer complex, epsilon-COP. PIRH2 promotes the ubiquitylation of epsilon-COP in vitro and in vivo and consequently promotes the degradation of epsilon-COP. The interaction between PIRH2 and epsilon-COP is affected by the presence of androgen, and PIRH2 in the presence of androgen promotes ubiquitylation of epsilon-COP in vivo. Furthermore, overexpression of the wild type of PIRH2 in prostate cancer cells causes downregulation of the secretion of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), a secretory protein in prostate epithelial cells and one of diagnostic markers for prostate cancer. Our results indicate that PIRH2 functions as a regulator for COP I complex.

Prostate cancer cells increase androgen sensitivity by increase in nuclear androgen receptor and androgen receptor coactivators; a possible mechanism of hormone-resistance of prostate cancer cells

Although androgen-hypersensitivity is one of the possible pathways of hormone-resistance in prostate cancer, the mechanisms of androgen-hypersensitivity are still largely unknown. Using androgen-hypersensitive prostate cancer cells LN-TR2, established from androgen-sensitive LNCaP cells by the long term treatment with tumor necrosis factor alpha, we explored the mechanisms of androgen-hypersensitivity in prostate cancer cells which may thus play a role in hormone-resistance. We examined the androgen receptor (AR) DNA sequence and the expression levels of AR and 8 AR cofactors in LNCaP and LN-TR2 cells. As a result, no novel mutation was developed in AR DNA in LN-TR2 cells. We observed higher expressions of nuclear AR upon androgen-treatment and 2 AR coactivators, ARA55 and TIF2, in LN-TR2 compared to LNCaP cells. An overexpression of ARA55 or TIF2 enhanced androgen-induced AR transcriptional activity in LNCaP cell. In the presence of those AR coactivators, AR activity was observed even at low concentrations of androgen. In 2 of 6 patients, the expression level of ARA55 was higher in cancer cells in hormone-resistant tumor than those in hormone-sensitive tumor. Taken together, our results suggest that prostate cancer cells change androgen-sensitivity by an overexpression of nuclear AR and AR coactivators, thus, resulting in transition from androgen-dependent to androgen-independent prostate cancer cells. An increase in nuclear AR and AR coactivators may cause androgen-hypersensitivity of prostate cancer cells and thus play a role in hormone-resistance, at least in some patients with prostate cancer.

Androgen receptor co-activator Hic-5/ARA55 as a molecular regulator of androgen sensitivity in dermal papilla cells of human hair follicles

Androgen site-specifically affects human hair growth after puberty through androgen receptors in the dermal papilla, which transactivate target genes acting in conjunction with co-activators. To examine the regulation of androgen sensitivity in hair follicles, we focused on androgen receptor co-activator Hic-5/ARA55. Its interaction with transfected androgen receptor in beard dermal papilla cells was confirmed with mammalian two-hybrid assays. The semiquantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction showed that Hic-5/ARA55 mRNA expression was high in dermal papilla cells from the beard and bald frontal scalp but low in cells from the occipital scalp. To determine whether Hic-5/ARA55 mRNA level correlates with its endogenous activity, we studied the effect of dominant negative Hic-5/ARA55 on transfected androgen receptor transactivation induced by R1881 using mouse mammary tumor virus-luciferase assays. We found that it suppressed the transactivation by 64.5 and 71.4% in dermal papilla cells from the beard and bald frontal scalp, respectively, whereas it showed no significant effect in cells from the occipital scalp. Our findings suggest that Hic-5/ARA55 is a molecular regulator for androgen sensitivity in human hair follicles.

Androgen receptor coregulators and their involvement in the development and progression of prostate cancer

The androgen receptor signaling axis plays an essential role in the development, function and homeostasis of male urogenital structures including the prostate gland although the mechanism by which the AR axis contributes to the initiation, progression and metastatic spread of prostate cancer remains somewhat enigmatic. A number of molecular events have been proposed to act at the level of the AR and associated coregulators to influence the natural history of prostate cancer including deregulated expression, somatic mutation, and post-translational modification. The purpose of this article is to review the evidence for deregulated expression and function of the AR and associated coactivators and corepressors and how such events might contribute to the progression of prostate cancer by controlling the selection and expression of AR targets.

Suppression of androgen receptor transactivation and prostate cancer cell growth by heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 via interaction with androgen receptor coregulator ARA54

The androgen receptor (AR) requires coregulators for its optimal transactivation. Whether AR coregulators also need interacting proteins to modulate their function remains unclear. Here we describe heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) A1 as an associated negative modulator for the AR coregulator ARA54. hnRNP A1 selectively suppressed ARA54-enhanced wild-type and mutant AR transactivation via interruption of AR-ARA54 interaction and ARA54 homodimerization. Stable transfection of hnRNP A1 in the LNCaP cells suppressed AR-mediated cell growth and the expression of prostate-specific antigen, and this suppressive effect was abolished by the addition of ARA54-small interfering RNA. Small interfering RNA knockdown of endogenous hnRNP A1 enhanced cell growth and prostate-specific antigen expression in LNCaP cells. These results not only suggest that the loss of hnRNP A1 expression might activate the ARA54-enhanced cell growth and contribute to the prostate cancer progression, but also demonstrate the dual functional roles for ARA54 as an AR coregulator directly and as a mediator for the suppressive effect of hnRNP A1 indirectly. The novel finding that a protein can modulate AR function without direct interaction with AR might provide a new therapeutic approach to battle prostate cancer by targeting AR indirectly with fewer side effects.

Mechanisms of androgen receptor repression in prostate cancer

Anti-androgens used in prostate cancer therapy inhibit AR (androgen receptor) activity via largely unknown mechanisms. Although initially successful in most cases, they eventually fail and the disease progresses. We need to elucidate how anti-androgens work to understand why they fail, and prolong their effects or design further therapies. Using a cellular model, we found different anti-androgens have diverse effects on subcellular localization of AR, revealing that they work via different mechanisms and suggesting that an informed sequential treatment regime may benefit patients. In the presence of the anti-androgens bicalutamide and hydroxyflutamide, a significant proportion of the AR is translocated to the nucleus but remains inactive. Receptor inhibition under these conditions is likely to involve recruitment of co-repressor proteins, which interact with antagonist-occupied receptor but inhibit receptor-dependent transcription. Which co-repressors are required in vivo for AR repression by anti-androgens is not clear, but one candidate is the Notch effector Hey1. This inhibits ligand-dependent activity of the AR but not other steroid receptors. Further, it is excluded from the nucleus in most human prostate cancers, suggesting that abnormal subcellular distribution of co-repressors may contribute to the aberrant hormonal responses observed in prostate cancer. A decrease in co-repressor function is one possible explanation for the development of anti-androgen-resistant prostate cancer, and this suggests that it may not occur at the gross level of protein expression.

Pathogenesis of prostate cancer and hormone refractory prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the second most common malignancy in males and the leading cause of cancer death. Prostate cancer is initially androgen dependent and relies upon the androgen receptor (AR) to mediate the effects of androgens. The AR is also the target for therapy using antiandrogens and LHRH analogues. However, all cancers eventually become androgen independent, often referred to as hormone refractory prostate cancer. The processes involved in this transformation are yet to be fully understood but research in this area has discovered numerous potential mechanisms including AR amplification, over-expression or mutation and alterations in the AR signaling pathway. This review of the recent literature examines the current knowledge and developments in the understanding of the molecular biology of prostate cancer and hormone refractory prostate cancer, summarizing the well characterized pathways involved as well as introducing new concepts that may offer future solutions to this difficult problem.

Screening of genetic and expression alterations of SRC1 gene in prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Genetic alterations of the SRC1 gene have not been thoroughly studied in prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five prostate cancer cell lines and 32 xenografts were screened for mutations and gene copy number alterations. Subsequently, frequencies of detected sequence variations were further analyzed in 44 clinical prostate cancers, 6 benign prostate hyperplasias, and 48 normal controls. Finally, the protein expression of SRC1 in 254 clinical prostate tumors was investigated.

RESULTS

Three non-recurrent sequence variations, and one single nucleotide polymorphism in the coding region of SRC1, as well as one case of SRC1 gene amplification were found. The protein expression of SRC1 was higher in androgen ablation resistant than untreated prostate carcinomas, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.0796).

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic alterations of SRC1 are rare in prostate cancer. The nuclear protein accumulation of SRC1 seems to be mildly increased in androgen ablation resistant prostate cancers. .

Hic-5/ARA55, a LIM Domain–Containing Nuclear Receptor Coactivator Expressed in Prostate Stromal Cells

Prostate gland development and growth requires both androgen action and epithelial-stromal communications. In fact, androgen signaling through the androgen receptor (AR) may be important in both stromal and epithelial cells of the prostate. Because interaction of AR with the coactivator, Hic-5/ARA55, results in enhanced androgen-induced transcription, we analyzed Hic-5/ARA55 expression in prostate tissue sections from normal human donors and prostate cancer patients. In each sample, Hic-5/ARA55 expression was confined to the stromal compartment of the prostate. Furthermore, a prostate stromal cell line, WPMY-1 cells, expresses Hic-5/ARA55, which is localized both at focal adhesion complexes and within the soluble cytoplasmic compartment. The ability of Hic-5/ARA55 to shuttle between the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments was revealed on inhibition of nuclear export with leptomycin B. Small interfering RNA ablation experiments established endogenous Hic-5/ARA55 as a coactivator for both viral and endogenous cellular AR-regulated genes. Finally, the mechanism of Hic-5/ARA55 coactivator activity in WPMY-1 cells was revealed by chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis that showed its androgen-dependent recruitment to the promoter of the stromal androgen-responsive keratinocyte growth factor gene. These data provide the first demonstration of a stromal-specific AR coactivator that has an effect on an androgen-regulated growth factor that is essential for stromal/epithelial cell communication in the prostate.

Expression of Rac3 in human brain tumors

Rac3 may play an important role in tumor growth but little is known about its expression and mutation in human tumor tissues. We examined the expression of Rac3 using RT-PCR and mutation of the Rac3 gene by DNA sequencing. Overexpression of the Rac3 gene occurred in 19% (5/26) of brain tumors; 3 of 9 (33%) meningiomas, 1 of 11 (9%) astrocytomas and 1 of 6 (17%) pituitary adenomas. Two of the 3 meningiomas with Rac3 overexpression were recurrent meningiomas. The only astrocytoma with Rac3 overexpression was a glioblastoma multiforme. Mutation of the Rac3 gene occurred in 63% (12/19) of brain tumours; 4 of 7 (57.1%) meningiomas, 4 of 5 (80%) pituitary adenomas and 4 of 7 (57.1%) astrocytomas. Except in one astrocytoma, the other four tumors with Rac3 overexpression (3 meningiomas and one pituitary adenoma) did not have Rac3 mutations. Our data is the first report of the frequency of Rac3 overexpression and mutation in human brain tumors. Overexpression may be associated with aggressive tumor behavior. The relationship between Rac3 expression and mutation requires further investigation.

The CCAAT Enhancer-Binding Protein-α Negatively Regulates the Transactivation of Androgen Receptor in Prostate Cancer Cells

The basic leucine zipper transcription factor, CCAAT enhancer-binding protein-alpha (C/EBPalpha), negatively regulates cell proliferation and induces terminal differentiation of various cell types. C/EBPalpha is expressed in the prostate, but its potential role in the tissue is unknown. Herein, we show that C/EBPalpha is highly expressed at the stage of growth arrest during prostate development. Furthermore, overexpression of C/EBPalpha decreases the rate of DNA synthesis in LNCaP prostate cancer cells. Investigation of the potential cross-talk between C/EBPalpha and androgen receptor (AR) that is responsible for androgen-dependent prostate proliferation demonstrates that androgen-dependent transactivation of AR is strongly repressed by C/EBPalpha. C/EBPalpha directly binds AR in vitro and forms a complex with AR in vivo. C/EBPalpha neither prevents the nuclear translocation of AR nor disrupts the N/C-terminal interaction of AR, which are both necessary for its proper transactivation activity upon ligand binding. To modulate AR transactivation, however, C/EBPalpha does compete with AR coactivators for AR binding. Additionally, C/EBPalpha is recruited onto AR-target promoters with AR and is further able to inhibit the expression of endogenous prostate-specific antigen in prostate cancer cells. Our results suggest C/EBPalpha as a potent AR corepressor and provide insight into the role of C/EBPalpha in prostate development and cancer.

DU-145 and PC-3 human prostate cancer cell lines express androgen receptor: Implications for the androgen receptor functions and regulation

The majority of human prostate cancer cell lines, including the two "classical" cell lines DU-145 and PC-3, are reported to be androgen receptor (AR)-negative. However, other studies have provided evidence that the DU-145 and PC-3 cell lines express AR mRNA. These contradictory observations prompted us to investigate whether DU-145 and PC-3 cell lines express the androgen receptor. Using antipeptide antibodies directed against three distinct regions of the human AR protein and an improved method to detect AR protein in immunoblotting, we report that DU-145 and PC-3 cell lines express AR protein. We found that the relative levels of the AR mRNA and protein that were detected in DU-145 and PC-3 cell lines were lower than the LNCaP, an AR-positive cell line. Moreover, the antibody directed against the non-variant region (amino acids 299-315), but not the variant N- or C-terminal region (amino acids 1-20 and 900-919, respectively) of the human AR protein, detected the expression of AR in all prostate cancer cell lines. Notably, treatment of these cell lines with dihydrotestosterone (DHT) resulted in measurable increases in the AR protein levels and considerable nuclear accumulation. Although, treatment of DU-145 and PC-3 cells with DHT did not result in stimulation of the activity of an AR-responsive reporter, knockdown of AR expression in PC-3 cells resulted in decreases in p21(CIP1) protein levels, and a measurable decrease in the activity of the p21-luc-reporter. Our observations demonstrate the expression of AR protein in DU-145 and PC-3 prostate cancer cell lines.

SUMO-3 Enhances Androgen Receptor Transcriptional Activity through a Sumoylation-independent Mechanism in Prostate Cancer Cells

Androgens are important for male sexual development, which depend on the cognate receptor, the androgen receptor. The transcriptional activity of the androgen receptor, like other nuclear receptors, is regulated by accessory proteins that can have either positive or negative effects. Through a yeast functional screen, we have identified SUMO-3 as a regulator of androgen receptor activity in prostate cancer cells. SUMO-3 is one of three eukaryotic proteins that become post-translationally conjugated to their target proteins in a manner analogous to the attachment of ubiquitin. In primary prostate epithelial cells, PrEC, and the prostate cancer cells, PC-3, SUMO-3 has a weak negative effect on androgen receptor transcriptional activity. In contrast, SUMO-3 and it close relative SUMO-2 strongly enhance transactivation by endogenous androgen receptor in LNCaP cells. This positive effect is observed in both androgen-dependent and androgen-independent LNCaP cells. Interestingly, SUMO-1, unlike SUMO-3 and SUMO-2, can inhibit, but not stimulate, androgen receptor activity. Mutational analysis of the androgen receptor and SUMO-3 demonstrates that the SUMO-3-positive activity does not depend on either the sumoylation sites of the androgen receptor or the sumoylation function of SUMO-3. Stable overexpression of SUMO-3 in LNCaP cells significantly enhances the androgen-dependent proliferation of these cells. Additionally, siRNA-mediated repression of SUMO-2 significantly inhibits the growth of both androgen-dependent and -independent LNCaP cells. Collectively, these results suggest (i) a novel mechanism for elevating AR activity through the switch of SUMO-3 from a weak negative regulator in normal prostate cells to a strong positive regulator in prostate cancer cells and (ii) a proliferative role for SUMO-3 and SUMO-2 in the growth of prostate cancer cells that is independent of sumoylation of the androgen receptor.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone functionally antagonizes testosterone activation of the human androgen receptor in prostate cells through focal adhesion complexes involving Hic-5

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs constitute the most widely employed medical treatment for prostatic cancer. The predominant mechanism of action is presumed to be via the inhibition of gonadotropins and resultant decrease in androgen. However, GnRH analogs have also been shown to directly inhibit prostate cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo through antiproliferative cell cycle arrest and stimulation of apoptosis. Since the GnRH receptor has been shown to affect sex steroid hormone receptor function, we considered that part of GnRH analog actions on prostate cells may be mediated through modulation of the human androgen receptor. Using a model HEK293 cell line expressing the GnRH receptor, we demonstrated a novel signalling pathway of the GnRH receptor that induces nuclear translocation of the androgen receptor that renders it transcriptionally inactive. This mechanism involves the calcium-dependent tyrosine kinase Pyk2, the non-receptor tyrosine kinase c-Src and the focal adhesion protein/steroid receptor co-factor, Hic-5. In this setting there is a GnRH-induced association and nuclear translocation of the androgen receptor with Hic-5. GnRH-induced Pyk2 activation opposed the association of Hic-5 with androgen receptor as overexpression of a dominant negative Pyk2 enhanced the GnRH-induced nuclear translocation of a green fluorescent protein-tagged human androgen receptor. GnRH-induced c-Src activation resulted in the phosphorylation of expressed Hic-5 and promoted its association with the human androgen receptor. In contrast to testosterone, GnRH-induced nuclear translocation did not transcriptionally activate the androgen receptor. We then demonstrated that GnRH can also stimulate androgen receptor mobilization in human prostate PC3, BPH-1 and LNCaP cells, and in cultured rat ventral prostate cells through the same mechanism. To determine if GnRH could antagonize androgen effects in normal tissue, we examined the effect of GnRH on rat ventral prostate organ cultures and demonstrated that GnRH can functionally antagonize the actions of testosterone on prostate cell proliferation and tissue growth. This antagonism of testosterone action by GnRH may underlie in part the capacity of GnRH receptor activation to inhibit prostate tumor growth.

Endocrine disrupting compounds and prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is a major health concern and is treated based on its hormone dependence. Agents that alter hormone action can have substantial biological effects on prostate cancer development and progression. As such, there is significant interest in uncovering the potential effects of endocrine disrupting compound (EDC) exposure on prostate cancer. The present review is focused on agents that alter hormone action in the prostate and how they may impact cancer growth or treatment.

Biologia molecular das neoplasias de próstata

O câncer de próstata (CP) é uma das principais causas de doença e morte, representando no Brasil a segunda causa de óbitos por câncer em homens. A hiperplasia prostática benigna (HPB) é uma doença progressiva de alta prevalência, com evidências histológicas em 50% dos homens aos 50 anos e 90% aos 80 anos de idade. A patogênese das neoplasias prostáticas tem sido associada à ação dos androgênios e a seu receptor nuclear específico, embora os mecanismos moleculares que envolvem os processos de proliferação, diferenciação e apoptose não estejam bem estabelecidos, assim como os mecanismos de transformação neoplásica e carcinogênese. Co-ativadores e co-repressores podem também contribuir para a carcinogênese prostática, ligando-se diretamente aos receptores nucleares, recrutando proteínas adicionais e interagindo com a maquinaria transcricional para aumentar a transcrição de genes-alvo. Polimorfismos do receptor de androgênios e da 5alfa redutase tipo 2 foram identificados e poderiam estar associados com risco para CP. Genes reguladores do ciclo celular e da apoptose, bem como fatores de crescimento, também participam de processos relacionados com a tumorigênese prostática. Assim, alterações no padrão da expressão gênica do tecido normal podem levar ao desenvolvimento do fenótipo maligno e potencialmente estes genes podem servir como marcadores de prognóstico. Com o advento de novas tecnologias moleculares, o número de genes marcadores potenciais para o CP cresce dia a dia, mas os dados atuais requerem ainda validação com maior número de amostras e correlação com o processo da doença. Trazê-los do ambiente de laboratório para o uso clínico requer uma análise rigorosa e há, portanto, um longo caminho ainda a percorrer.

Identification and analysis of Hic-5/ARA55 isoforms: Implications for integrin signaling and steroid hormone action

Hic-5/ARA55 is a LIM-only member of the paxillin superfamily. Conflicting reports have suggested that Hic-5/ARA55 can both repress and enhance a number of biological processes, including myogenesis and tumorigenesis. With two Hic-5 isoforms documented, we hypothesized that multiple Hic-5 isoforms may exist that have both overlapping and isoform-specific functions. To test this hypothesis, we performed an extensive analysis of Hic-5 transcripts in both cell lines and mouse tissues and found 12 distinct isoforms that fall into two sub-families. These isoforms are derived from both alternative splicing and alternative transcriptional start sites (TSS). Hic-5 expression is regulated in a temporally and spatially controlled manner in vivo. The identification of numerous Hic-5 isoforms suggests that Hic-5 subsumes a number of distinct roles in cells and may explain the range of biological responses attributed to Hic-5.