Repeat transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a strategy to improve the reliability of needle biopsy grading in patients with well-differentiated prostate cancer

Quick identification of prostate cancer by wavelet transform-based photoacoustic power spectrum analysis

Pathology is currently the gold standard for grading prostate cancer (PCa). However, pathology takes considerable time to provide a final result and is significantly dependent on subjective judgment. In this study, wavelet transform-based photoacoustic power spectrum analysis (WT-PASA) was used for grading PCa with different Gleason scores (GSs). The tumor region was accurately identified via wavelet transform time-frequency analysis. Then, a linear fitting was conducted on the photoacoustic power spectrum curve of the tumor region to obtain the quantified spectral parameter slope. The results showed that high GSs have small glandular cavity structures and higher heterogeneity, and consequently, the slopes at both 1210 nm and 1310 nm were high (p < 0.01). The classification accuracy of the PA time frequency spectrum (PA-TFS) of tumor region using ResNet-18 was 89% at 1210 nm and 92.7% at 1310 nm. Further, the testing time was less than 7 mins. The results demonstrated that identification of PCa can be rapidly and objectively realized using WT-PASA.

Impact of Pathology Review for Decision Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer

Background

The Gleason score is an essential tool in the decision to treat localized prostate cancer. However, experienced pathologists can classify Gleason score differently than do low-volume pathologists, and this may affect the treatment decision. This study sought to assess the impact of pathology review of external biopsy specimens from 23 men with a recent diagnosis of localized prostate cancer.

Methods

All external biopsy specimens were reviewed at our pathology department. Data were retrospectively collected from scanned charts.

Results

The median patient age was 63 years (range: 46-74 years). All patients had a Karnofsky performance score of 90% to 100%. The median prostate-specific antigen level was 23.6 ng/dL (range: 1.04-13.6 ng/dL). Among the 23 reviews, the Gleason score changed for 8 (35%) patients: 7 upgraded and 1 downgraded. The new Gleason score affected the treatment decision in 5 of 8 cases (62.5%).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the need for pathology review in patients with localized prostate cancer before treatment because Gleason score can change in more than one-third of patients and can affect treatment decision in almost two-thirds of recategorized patients.

High risk of under-grading and -staging in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance

Background

Active surveillance (AS) is increasingly offered to patients with low risk prostate cancer. The present study was conducted to evaluate the risk of tumor under-grading and -staging for AS eligibility. Moreover, we analyzed possible biomarkers for predicting more unfavorable final tumor histology.

Methods

197 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RPE) but would have met the EAU (European Association of Urology) criteria for AS (PSA<10 ng/ml, biopsy GS ≤6, ≤2 cancer-positive biopsy cores with ≤50% of tumor in any core and clinical stage ≤T2a) were included in the study. These AS inclusion parameters were correlated to the final histology of the RPE specimens. The impact of preoperative PSA level (low PSA ≤4 ng/ml vs. intermediate PSA of >4–10 ng/ml), PSA density (<15 vs. ≥ 15 ng/ml) and the number of positive biopsy cores (1 vs. 2 positive cores) on predicting upgrading and final adverse histology of the RPE specimens was analyzed in uni- and multivariate analyses. Moreover, clinical courses of undergraded patients were assessed.

Results

In our patient cohort 41.1% were found under-graded in the biopsy (final histology 40.1% GS7, 1% GS8). Preoperative PSA levels, PSA density or the number of positive cores were not predictive for worse final pathological findings including GS >6, extraprostatic extension and positive resection margin (R1) or correlated significantly with up-grading and/or extraprostatic extension in a multivariate model. Only R1 resections were predictable by combining intermediate PSA levels with two positive biopsy cores (p = 0.004). Sub-analyses showed that the number of biopsy cores (10 vs. 15 biopsy cores) had no influence on above mentioned results on predicting biopsy undergrading. Clinical courses of patients showed that 19.9% of patients had a biochemical relapse after RPE, among all of them were undergraded in the initial biopsy.

Conclusion

In summary, this study shows that a multitude of patients fulfilling the criteria for AS are under-diagnosed. The use of preoperative PSA levels, PSA density and the number of positive cores were not predictable for undergrading in the present patient collective.

Random biopsy: when, how many and where to take the cores?

PURPOSE

The optimal random prostate biopsy scheme (PBx) in the initial and repeated setting is still an issue of controversy. We performed an analysis of the recent literature about the prostate biopsy techniques.

METHODS

We performed a clinical and critical literature review by searching MEDLINE database from January 2005 up to January 2014. Electronic searches were limited to the English language, and the keywords prostate cancer, prostate biopsy, transrectal ultrasound, transperineal prostate biopsy were used.

RESULTS

Prostate biopsy strategy in initial setting. According to the literature and the major international guidelines, the recommended approach in initial setting is still the extended scheme (EPBx) (12 cores). However, there is now a growing evidence in the literature that (a) saturation PBx (>20 cores) (SPBx) might be indicated in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml or low PSA density or large prostate and (b) an individualized approach with more than 12 cores according to the clinical characteristics of the patients may optimize cancer detection in the single patient. Moreover, in the era of multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI), EPBx or SPBX may be substituted by mpMRI-targeted biopsies that have demonstrated superiority over systematic random biopsies for the detection of clinically significant disease and representation of disease burden, while deploying fewer cores. Prostate biopsy strategy in repeat setting. How and how many cores should be taken in the different scenarios in the repeated setting is still unclear. SPBx clearly improves cancer detection if clinical suspicion persists after previous biopsy with negative findings and is able to provide an accurate prediction of prostate tumour volume and grade. Nevertheless, international guidelines do not strongly recommended SPBx in all situations of repeated setting. In the active surveillance and in focal therapy protocols, the optimal schemes have to be defined.

CONCLUSIONS

The course of PBx has changed significantly from sextant biopsies to systematic and from extended to SPBx schemes. The issue about the number and location of the cores is still a matter of debate both in initial and in repeat setting. At present, EPBx is sufficient in most of the cases to provide adequate diagnosis and prostate cancer characterization in the initial setting, while SPBx seems to be necessary in repeat setting. The PBx schemes are evolving also because the scenario in which a PBx is necessary is changing. Random prostate PBx do not represent the future, while imaging target biopsy are becoming more popular.

Concordance between transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy results and radical prostatectomy final pathology: Are we getting better at predicting final pathology?

INTRODUCTION

Inaccuracy in biopsy Gleason scoring poses a risk to men who may then receive inappropriate treatment. We assess whether there was a change in discordance rates between biopsy and radical prostatectomy at our institution in recent years, while considering the implementation of active surveillance and the shift in biopsy scores caused by the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology update to the Gleason scoring protocol.

METHODS

We reviewed patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at our institution between May 2004 and April 2011. We analyzed clinical and pathological correlates of upgrading in 3 subgroups: Gleason sum (GS) 6/6, GS6/7 and GS7/7, where the sum preceding the dash was determined from biopsy and the subsequent sum was determined from the radical prostatectomy specimen. We applied the log-rank test and Cox model to a Kaplan Meier analysis of biochemical recurrence in the subgroups, and also mapped GS6/7 discordance over time.

RESULTS

In total, 1717 patients met our inclusion criteria. The 3 subgroups had significantly different mean prostate-specific antigen, patient age, tumour volume, margin status, pathologic stage, prostate weight, transrectal ultrasound volume and rate of progression (p < 0.05). We noted a multiphasic trend with a fall in discordance after 2005. However, there was no sustained trend over the study period taken as a whole (p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Although no sustained trend was observed, the falling discordance after 2005 may reflect the accommodation to the Gleason scoring update, while the gradual adoption of active surveillance may have led to the otherwise increasing trends. However, our observations may also be spurious biopsy sampling errors.

Role of immediate confirmatory prostate biopsy to ensure accurate eligibility for active surveillance

OBJECTIVE

To assess the role of confirmatory prostate biopsy in the accurate risk assessment of patients with low risk prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance.

METHODS

Patients electing active surveillance of their low grade, low volume prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen <20 ng/mL, <cT2 disease who underwent confirmatory rebiopsy were included. Biopsy progression was defined as >2 core involvement or Gleason 7 disease on subsequent biopsies. Prostate-specific antigen, total number of cores on initial and rebiopsy, the presence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and prostate-specific antigen density, when available, were assessed as predictors of biopsy progression.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included. Median time to rebiopsy was 2 months. Nineteen patients (31.7%) had findings that excluded them from active surveillance. Despite rebiopsy findings, 7 patients elected for active surveillance, all of which eventually underwent treatment for continued biopsy progression. Of the 41 patients eligible for active surveillance after rebiopsy, 8% elected treatment, 74% remained on active surveillance, and 13% experienced biopsy progression. No cancer on rebiopsy was associated with a reduced risk of progression to treatment on active surveillance (odds ratio 0.14, P = .011). A microfocus of Gleason 4 pattern (odds ratio 16.0, P = .04) and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (odds ratio 7.29, P = .03) on initial biopsy were independent predictors of immediate rebiopsy progression. Prostate-specific antigen, prostate-specific antigen density, and the total number of cores were not significant.

CONCLUSION

Confirmatory rebiopsy aids in the accurate identification of low-risk patients for active surveillance as one-third are initially undergraded. Patients with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and any Gleason pattern 4 on initial biopsy are at highest risk and should be counseled regarding the risks of progression on active surveillance accordingly.

Introducing parametric fusion PET/MRI of primary prostate cancer

We assessed the performance of parametric fusion PET/MRI based on (11)C-choline PET/CT and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps derived from diffusion-weighted MRI for the identification of primary prostate cancer.

METHODS

(11)C-choline PET/CT and MRI were performed in 17 patients with untreated primary prostate cancer, followed by prostatectomy. Registration of in vivo imaging with histology was achieved using a mutual-information objective function and by performing ex vivo MRI of the prostatectomy specimen (obtained at 3 T) and whole-mount sectioning with block-face photography as intermediate steps. Data analysis included volumetrically registered whole-mount histology with Gleason scoring, (11)C-choline, and ADC data (obtained at 1.5 T). Volumes of interest were defined on the basis of histologically proven tumor tissue to calculate tumor-to-benign prostate background ratios (TBRs) for (11)C-choline, ADC, and a derived fusion PET/MRI parameter calculating the quotient of (11)C-choline over ADC (P(CHOL/ADC)).

RESULTS

Fifty-one tumor nodules were identified at pathology. The TBRs for (11)C-choline (P < 0.05) and P(CHOL/ADC) (P < 0.005) were significantly higher in prostate cancers with a Gleason score of ≥3 + 4 than with a Gleason score of ≤3 + 3 disease and controls. For Gleason ≥ 3 + 4, the ADC TBRs were significantly lower than controls and Gleason ≤ 3 + 3 disease (P < 0.05). The absolute value of TBRs obtained from Gleason ≥ 3 + 4 cancers increased from ADC to (11)C-choline PET/CT and from (11)C-choline PET/CT to P(CHOL/ADC), with each step being statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that parametric PET/MRI using P(CHOL/ADC) improves lesion-to-background contrast (TBRs) of Gleason ≥ 3 + 4 disease, compared with (11)C-choline PET/CT or diffusion-weighted MRI, and thus hold promise that parametric imaging performed on hybrid PET/MRI may further improve identification and localization of significant primary prostate cancer.

3.4 kb mitochondrial genome deletion serves as a surrogate predictive biomarker for prostate cancer in histopathologically benign biopsy cores

Recently, we described a 3.4-kb mitochondrial genome deletion having significance for identifying malignant and benign prostate tissues (p < 0.001). This biomarker was also present in normal appearing tissue, in close proximity to a tumour indicating a "field effect." In the present study, we report 4 cases (3 malignant, 1 benign) which suggest that this field effect may occur before tumourigenesis; this effect may also identify the presence of a small tumour focus/foci, which are difficult to detect with single or multiple biopsy procedures.

Detection of aggressive primary prostate cancer with 11C-choline PET/CT using multimodality fusion techniques

The aim of the study was to assess whether (11)C-choline PET/CT could identify high-risk primary adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

METHODS

(11)C-choline PET/CT and transpelvic MRI were performed in 14 patients with untreated localized primary adenocarcinoma of the prostate, followed by radical prostatectomy as a form of primary monotherapy within 14 d of in vivo imaging. To allow accurate coregistration of whole-mount histology with in vivo imaging, additional ex vivo MR images of the prostatectomy specimen were obtained. Nonlinear 3-dimensional image deformations were used for registrations of PET/CT, MRI, and histology. Volumes of interest from tumor and benign tissue were defined on the basis of histology and were transferred into coregistered (11)C-choline PET/CT volumes to calculate the mean (T((mean))/B) and maximum (T((max))/B) ratio of tumor to benign prostate background. On the basis of MIB-1/Ki-67 expression in tumor tissues represented on a tissue microarray, we assessed whether (11)C-choline uptake correlated with local Gleason score and tumor proliferation.

RESULTS

Histology confirmed 42 tumor nodules with Gleason scores between 3 + 2 and 4 + 4, with volumes ranging from 0.03 to 12.6 cm(3). T((mean))/B (P < 0.01) and T((max))/B (P < 0.001) ratios were significantly increased in high-Gleason score (>or=4 + 3) lesions versus 3 + 4 and lower disease but failed to distinguish between 3 + 4 disease versus 3 + 3 and lower. T((mean))/B and T((max))/B ratios were significantly increased in tumors with an MIB-1/Ki-67 labeling index greater than or equal to 5% (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

On the basis of our preliminary data using ratios of tumor to benign prostate background, (11)C-choline preferentially identified aggressive primary prostate cancer.

Well-differentiated prostate cancer in core biopsy specimens may be associated with extraprostatic disease

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE

Accurate determination of the Gleason score in prostate core biopsy specimens is crucial in selecting the type of prostate cancer treatment, especially for patients with well-differentiated tumors (Gleason score 2 to 4). For such patients, an inaccurate biopsy score may result in a therapeutic intervention that is too conservative. We evaluate the role of Gleason score 2-4 in prostate core-needle biopsies for predicting the final pathological staging following radical prostatectomy.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Retrospective study at Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo.

METHODS

We analyzed the medical records of 120 consecutive patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy to treat clinical localized prostate cancer at our institution between December 2001 and July 2006. Thirty-two of these patients presented well-differentiated tumors (Gleason score 2 to 4) in biopsy specimens and were included in the study. The Gleason scores of the core-needle biopsies were compared with the pathological staging of the surgical specimens.

RESULTS

Sixteen of the 32 patients (50%) presented moderately differentiated tumors (Gleason score 5 to 7) in surgical specimens. Eighteen patients (56%) had tumors with involvement of the prostate capsule and ten (31%) had involvement of adjacent organs. Evaluating the 16 patients that maintained Gleason scores of 2 to 4 in the pathological staging of the surgical specimens, 11 (68.7%) had focal invasion of the prostate capsule and five (31.25%) had organ-confined disease.

CONCLUSION

Well-differentiated tumors (Gleason score 2 to 4) seen in biopsies are not predictive of organ-confined disease.

Extended pattern prostate biopsy does not minimize the volume-grade bias in prostate cancer detection

PURPOSE

The higher number of high grade cancers noted in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial may have arisen due to a previously unknown association between prostate volume and sextant biopsy derived grade, rendering it more difficult to detect high grade cancer in men with a larger prostate (volume-grade bias). A basic tenet of measurement theory is that repeat measurement improves validity. We determined whether an extended pattern prostate biopsy technique could overcome this bias.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the record of 679 patients who underwent systematic extended (10 cores or greater) biopsy with isoechoic prostate transrectal ultrasound and prostate specific antigen less than 10 ng/ml. Since specimens were separately labeled, we were able to compare the grade of the first 6 cores vs that of the extended pattern. We determined the highest grade achieved using traditional sextant biopsy and the change induced by marginal samples across volume tertiles, hypothesizing that if upgrading did not occur by volume, additional biopsies would be ineffective for minimizing this bias.

RESULTS

Prostate cancer detected using a 6-core technique revealed 179 of 679 cancers (26.4%) vs 240 of 679 (35.4%) using the extended core technique (p <0.001). The marginal cancer detection rate increased significantly as prostate volume increased. Cancer detection rates for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd tertiles of prostate volume were increased by 16 of 227, 17 of 226 and 28 of 226 cases, respectively (p = 0.05). With respect to Gleason score, upgrading from Gleason 6 to 7 was observed in 14 patients (7.9%) due to the additional procured cores (p <0.001). However there was no association among the various prostate volumes (p = 0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

Although more high grade cancers are detected with extended pattern biopsy, there is no differential upgrading with respect to prostate volume. Based on these observations extended prostate sampling in trials of agents that decrease prostate volume would have minimal impact on volume-grade associations.

Predicting the risk of patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 to harbor a higher grade cancer

PURPOSE

Prostate cancer Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 is currently the most common score assigned on prostatic biopsies. We analyzed the clinical variables that predict the likelihood of a patient with biopsy Gleason score 6 to harbor a higher grade tumor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study population consisted of 448 patients with a mean age of 59.1 years who underwent radical prostatectomy between February 2003 to October 2006 for Gleason score 6 adenocarcinoma. The effect of preoperative variables on the probability of a Gleason score upgrade on final pathological evaluation was evaluated using logistic regression, and classification and regression tree analysis.

RESULTS

Gleason score upgrade was found in 91 of 448 patients (20.3%). Logistic regression showed that only serum prostate specific antigen and the greatest percent of cancer in a core were significantly associated with a score upgrade (p = 0.0014 and 0.023, respectively). Classification and regression tree analysis showed that the risk of a Gleason score upgrade was 62% when serum prostate specific antigen was higher than 12 ng/ml and 18% when serum prostate specific antigen was 12 ng/ml or less. In patients with serum prostate specific antigen lower than 12 ng/ml the risk of a score upgrade could be dichotomized at a greatest percent of cancer in a core of 5%. The risk was 22.6% and 10.5% when the greatest percent of cancer in a core was higher than 5% and 5% or lower, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The probability of patients with a prostate biopsy Gleason score of 6 to conceal a Gleason score of 7 or higher can be predicted using serum prostate specific antigen and the greatest percent of cancer in a core. With these parameters it is possible to predict upgrade rates as high as 62% and as low as 10.5%.

Diagnosis of prostate cancer

The contemporary challenge of prostate cancer diagnosis has been changed in the past decade from the endeavor to increase detection to that of detecting only those tumors that are clinically significant. Better interpretation of the role of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and its kinetics as a diagnostic tool, the adoption of extended prostate biopsy schemes, and perhaps implementation of new transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) technologies promote the achievement of this clinical mission. This chapter reviews these issues as well as the change in practice of patient preparation for TRUS-biopsy and analgesia during it, the role of repeat and saturation prostate biopsies, and the interpretation of an incidental prostate cancer finding. Currently, the lifetime risk of a diagnosis of prostate cancer for North American men is 16%, compared to the lifetime risk of death from prostate cancer, which is 3% (Carter 2004). The advent of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) has significantly impacted the detection of prostate cancer over the last 20 years. The mean age at diagnosis has decreased (Hankey et al. 1999; Stamey et al. 2004) and the most common stage at diagnosis is now localized disease (Newcomer et al. 1997; Stamey et al. 2004). The goal of prostate cancer screening is to detect only those men at risk for death from the disease at an early curable phase. The ambiguous natural history of this most common malignancy in men, being latent with questionable life-threatening potential in a large number of cases on the one hand, with only a relatively small number (though not negligible) of highly malignant cases on the other, propels many doubts about whether this is possible. This was famously phrased more than 20 years ago by Whitmore who asked: "Is cure possible for those in whom it is necessary; and is it necessary for those in whom it is possible?" This is probably even more relevant nowadays. During the past decade two factors influenced significantly the increased detection rate of prostate cancer in general and that of clinically insignificant prostate cancers in particular: the widespread use of serum PSA as a screening tool to a large extent and to a lesser though significant extent the application of extended multiple core biopsy schemes (Master et al. 2005). In fact, 75% of men in the United States aged 50 years and older have been screened with the PSA test (Sirovich et al. 2003). Outside of the screening context, which is dealt with in depth in Chap. 5, clinical suspicion of prostate cancer is raised usually by abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) and/or by abnormal levels of serum PSA. Final diagnosis is achieved only based on positive prostate biopsies.

Prostate Cancers Scored as Gleason 6 on Prostate Biopsy are Frequently Gleason 7 Tumors at Radical Prostatectomy: Implication on Outcome

PURPOSE

Differentiation between Gleason score 6 and 7 in prostate biopsy is important for treatment decision making. Nevertheless, under grading errors compared with the actual pathological grade at radical prostatectomy are common. We compared the characteristics and outcomes of tumors that were scored 6 on prostate biopsy but were 7 on subsequent radical prostatectomy pathological evaluation to those in tumors with a consistent rating of Gleason score 6 or 7 at biopsy and surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective database analysis from our referral center (1989 to 2004). We compared pre-prostatectomy characteristics, radical prostatectomy pathological features and the post-radical prostatectomy prostate specific antigen failure rate, defined as any 2 consecutive detectable prostate specific antigen measurements, in 3 subgroups of patients, including 156 with matched Gleason score 6 in the prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy, 205 with upgraded Gleason score 6/7, that is prostate biopsy Gleason score 6 and radical prostatectomy Gleason score 7, and 412 with matched Gleason score 7 in the prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy.

RESULTS

Radical prostatectomy Gleason score matched the prostate biopsy score in 38.2% of biopsy Gleason score 6 and 81.4% of biopsy Gleason score 7 cases. Higher prostate specific antigen was associated and an increased percent of cancer in the prostate biopsy was predictive of discordance between the prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason scores (p <0.001). Margin (p = 0.0075) or seminal vesicle involvement (p = 0.0002), cancer volume (p <0.001) and the prostate specific antigen failures rate (p = 0.014) were significantly higher in under graded Gleason score 7 cancer compared to those in matched Gleason score 6 cases. However, they were comparable to those with a matched Gleason score 7 tumor grade (p = 0.66).

CONCLUSIONS

Almost half of tumors graded Gleason score 6 at biopsy are Gleason score 7 at surgery. Upgraded Gleason score 6 to 7 tumors have outcomes similar to those of genuine Gleason score 7 cancer. For prostate biopsy Gleason score 6 tumors clinicians should consider the overall likelihood of tumor upgrading as well as specific patient characteristics, such as prostate specific antigen and the percent of tumor in the prostate biopsy, when contemplating treatments that are optimized for low grade tumors, including watchful waiting or brachytherapy.

Increased accuracy of biopsy Gleason score obtained by extended needle biopsy

PURPOSE

Accurate tumor grading is critical for adequate prostate cancer treatment. Nonetheless, the Gleason score of standard sextant biopsy correctly predicts the Gleason score of the radical prostatectomy specimen in about 50% of cases. We investigated if extended needle biopsy could improve biopsy Gleason score accuracy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomy was performed in 135 patients. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 89 cases by standard sextant transrectal (6 to 8 cores) biopsy and in 46 by extended needle (12 core transperineal under transrectal guidance) biopsy. Preoperative evaluation included digital rectal examination, prostatic specific antigen measurement, transrectal ultrasonography and endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in all patients. All biopsy and prostatectomy specimens were reviewed by a single pathologist.

RESULTS

Clinical characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. The concordance between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score was 32 of 46 cases (70%) and 44 of 89 (49%) for 12 core and standard transrectal biopsy, respectively (z test p = 0.0127). Biopsy under grading was found in 11 of 46 cases (24%) and 35 of 89 (39%) (z test p = 0.0366), and biopsy over grading was found in 3 of 46 (6%) and 10 of 89 (11%) (z test p = 0.1894) with 12 core and standard transrectal biopsy, respectively. Primary Gleason pattern was predicted exactly by biopsy in 40 of 46 cases (87%) and 56 of 89 (63%) with 12 core and standard sextant biopsy, respectively (z test p = 0.0018).

CONCLUSIONS

Extended needle biopsy significantly increases the accuracy of biopsy Gleason score for assessing final prostate cancer grade.

A method for assessing accurate application of the Partin Tables in the pre-therapy evaluation of patients with prostate cancer

AIMS

The treatment of prostate cancer is frequently influenced by the Partin Tables. This predictive model has been internally and externally validated since it was conceived, and has proved to be remarkably reliable and consistent. This paper proposes that, by using the statistical programme for the social sciences (SPSS) and receiver-operator characteristic curves, it is possible to detect institutions that apply this model sub-optimally.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This theory was supported by a PUBMED search using relevant search words.

RESULTS

This is a novel technique with the potential to allow retrospective and prospective accrual of results.

CONCLUSIONS

A systematic institutional review of how accurately a hospital assesses the clinical stage, Gleason score and PSA has the potential to increase an institution's predictive accuracy when it uses the Partin Tables. The proposed method allows for quantitation of the level of error and comparison of predictive accuracy between institutions. It also may be used as an internal outcome measure to assess improvement in a hospital's investigative procedures over time.

Prognostic and predictive factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in prostate needle biopsy specimens

The information provided in the surgical pathology report of a prostate needle biopsy of carcinoma has become critical in the subsequent management and prognostication of the cancer. The surgical pathology report should thus be comprehensive and yet succinct in providing relevant information consistently to urologists, radiation oncologists and oncologists and, thereby, to the patient. This paper reflects the current recommendations of the 2004 World Health Organization-sponsored International Consultation, which was co-sponsored by the College of American Pathologists. It builds on the existing work of several organizations, including the College of American Pathologists, the Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathologists, the Royal Society of Pathologists, the European Society of Urologic Pathology and the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.

The incidence of prostate cancer in men with prostate specific antigen greater than 4.0 ng/ml: a randomized study of 6 versus 12 core transperineal prostate biopsy

PURPOSE

The prostate cancer detection rate in patients with elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) increases with extended needle biopsy protocols. Transperineal biopsy under transrectal ultrasound guidance is rarely reported, although notable cancer diagnoses are obtained with this technique. We describe the results of 6 and 12 core transperineal biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 214 patients with PSA greater than 4.0 ng/ml were prospectively randomized to undergo 6 or 12 core transperineal biopsy. Each group of 107 patients was comparable in terms of clinical characteristics. The procedure was performed on an outpatient basis using local anesthesia. Specimens were obtained with a fan technique with 2 puncture sites slightly above the rectum (1 per lobe) under transrectal ultrasound guidance. Cores were taken from all peripheral areas, including the far lateral aspect of the prostate.

RESULTS

The overall cancer detection rate was 38% and 51% for 6 and 12 core biopsy, respectively. In patients with PSA between 4.1 and 10 ng/ml the cancer detection rate was 30% and 49% for 6 and 12 core biopsy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 12 core transperineal prostate biopsy is superior to 6 core biopsy. The technique provides optimal prostate cancer diagnosis. About half of the patients with PSA greater than 4.0 ng/ml and a slightly lower percent with PSA between 4.1 and 10 ng/ml have prostate cancer.

Accuracy of gleason grading by practicing pathologists and the impact of education on improving agreement

The aims of this study were to evaluate the accuracy of Gleason grading for prostatic adenocarcinoma among practicing pathologists in Japan and to determine the influence of education on this accuracy. Using a case-oriented approach, 16 hematoxylin and eosin-;stained glass slides with consensus scores established by 4 urologic pathologists were reviewed by 91 pathologists, divided into 2 groups. In group A, average agreements with consensus scores before and after an educational lecture were 55.7% (n = 17) and 68.4% (n = 25), and average kappa values were 0.43 and 0.67, respectively. Twelve pathologists reviewed slides twice in a different order, with average agreements of 59.5% and 77.6%, and average kappa values of 0.48 and 0.69 before and after the lecture, yielding a statistically significant improvement. In group B, the average agreement before providing an atlas with a tutorial was 61.3% (n = 61), and the kappa value was 0.44. In the second round, the average agreement was 74.5% (n = 39), and the kappa value was 0.68. Among 39 pathologists who reviewed slides twice, the average agreement in the first round was 58.8%, and the kappa value was 0.42. Improvement of both the average agreement and the kappa value were statistically significant. The average improvement in kappa values among participants who reviewed slides twice was 0.22 in group A and 0.27 in group B, a difference that is not statistically significant. Combining both groups, the incidence of concordant scores for 16 cases rose from 58.9% to 75.4%, an average increase of 16.5%. The undergrading of score 5-7 lesions was significantly reduced, from 36.3% to 14.2%. With respect to demographic factors, pathologists signing out more than 5000 cases per year showed a better agreement than those with more than 1000 cases per year (48.9% versus 78.8%; P = 0.031). These results indicate that the general agreement of Gleason scores among practicing pathologists in Japan was comparable with those in the Western countries as reported in the literature. Although this requires further improvement, both the lecture and the printed material had a similar influence on the degree of improvement.

When to biopsy and when to stop biopsying

With the widespread use of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the prostate in men with suspected prostate cancer, physicians are faced with the dilemma of treating a patient with a high index of suspicion of prostate cancer but with an initial set of negative biopsies. For the initial biopsy, the optimal number of biopsy cores for detecting prostate cancer in prostate biopsy remains controversial; it is also often unclear who should undergo a repeat prostatebiopsy and when to stop biopsying.

Use of extended systematic sampling in patients with a prior negative prostate needle biopsy

PURPOSE

We examine the potential impact of extended systematic biopsy schemes in patients with a prior negative prostate biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 1999 and March 2001, 185 patients with a prior negative prostate needle biopsy underwent repeat biopsy. Systematic 10 core biopsies (sextant, lateral mid gland and lateral base) were performed in all patients. A subset of 111 patients underwent 6 additional biopsies directed anteriorly. All biopsy results were reviewed by a single pathologist. The overall and unique cancer detection rates were calculated for each biopsy site. McNemar's test was then used to compare the yield of various simulated biopsy schemes to define the optimal biopsy regimen.

RESULTS

Overall, 67 of 185 patients (36%) were found to have cancer on repeat biopsy. The highest detection rate was found for the apex, lateral base and lateral mid sites. The mid lobar base site consistently yielded the lowest detection rate. These results were mirrored in the unique cancer detection rate calculations. The traditional sextant scheme detected only 73% of tumors. Using a lateral sextant scheme (apex, lateral mid gland and lateral base), the detection rate increased to 85% (p = 0.15). An 8 core biopsy scheme (apex, mid gland, lateral mid gland and lateral base) increased the detection rate to 95%. However, there was no significant increase in cancer detection rate when the 8 core scheme was compared to the 10 core scheme. The 6 anteriorly directed biopsies uniquely detected only 2 cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend that patients with a prior negative prostate biopsy who are undergoing repeat biopsy receive at least an 8 core biopsy scheme weighted toward the lateral aspect of the prostate.

Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies

PURPOSE

We hypothesized that markedly increasing the number of cores obtained during prostate needle biopsy may improve the cancer detection rate in men with persistent indications for repeat biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed saturation ultrasound guided transrectal prostate needle biopsy in 224 men under anesthesia in an outpatient surgical setting in whom previous negative biopsies had been performed in the office. The mean number of previous sextant biopsy sessions plus or minus standard deviation before saturation biopsy was 1.8 (range 1 to 7). A mean of 23 saturation biopsy cores (range 14 to 45) were distributed throughout the whole prostate, including the peripheral, medial and anterior regions. Indications for repeat biopsy were persistent elevated serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) in 108 cases, persistent elevated PSA and abnormal rectal examination in 27, persistent abnormal rectal examination in 4, high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in the previous biopsy in 64 and atypia in the previous biopsy in 21.

RESULTS

Cancer was detected in 77 of 224 patients (34%). The number of previous negative sextant biopsies was not predictive of subsequent cancer detection by saturation biopsy. Median PSA was 8.7 ng./ml. and median PSA velocity was 0.63 ng./ml. yearly. Of the 77 patients in whom cancer was detected radical prostatectomy was performed in 52. Pathological stage was pT2 in 48 patients and pT3 in 4, while Gleason score was 4 to 5, 6 to 7 and 8 in 5, 46 and 1, respectively. At prostatectomy median cancer volume was 1.04 cc and 85.7% of removed tumors were clinically significant, assuming a 3-year doubling time. The overall complication rate for saturation needle biopsy was 12% and hematuria requiring hospital admission was the most common event.

CONCLUSIONS

Saturation needle biopsy of the prostate is a useful diagnostic technique in men at risk for prostate cancer with previous negative office biopsies. This technique allows adequate sampling of the whole prostate gland and has a detection rate of 34% in this cohort of patients.